Conversation
| #[Examples(1, 1)] | ||
| #[Examples(2, 2)] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As already mentioned in #6752 (comment) this is a slight BC break introduced by this PR.
However, the behavior doesn't seem to be documented and from DX perspective I would prefer the new behavior.
Any thoughts about this are welcome.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The first syntax allows for dereferencing from arrays using .... also what about generators? They can't use the 2nd Syntax
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The first syntax allows for dereferencing from arrays using
....
Shouldn't this still be possible by just passing an array as example, f.e. #[Examples(['foo' => 'bar'])]? Please correct me if I misunderstood the problem.
what about generators? They can't use the 2nd Syntax
Do you mean that the new syntax breaks generators? Can you provide an example?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I dont remember exactly.
But I'll say this: to me having a different behaviour depending on the type of argument given to the attribute is bad design, both from a code quality as well as a DX perspective.
I don't remember this PR (it's been a while, so feel free to ignore this comment and merge if you like it.
W0rma
force-pushed
the
single-examples-attribute
branch
from
4ecaaad to
c2a260f
Compare
|
@W0rma OK, here's what I think about it: If this introduces a BC there is no alternative but to point it to the next major version You can integrate this right now by creating a way to manually activate it with the old behavior being the default. I prepared a PR of how I imagine you could implement it: W0rma#1 You would have to add documentation here and there and think of better names for the flag, but this is the only way I see to add this in Plan C is to make a new .yml configuration parameter for this. I agree with SamMousa that this could still be designed better, so it would be a feature marked as experimental (in other words, we are not yet going to deprecate current behavior). |
4 participants
Fixes #6726
The current implementation of the
#[Examples]attribute differs from what is documented at https://codeception.com/docs/AdvancedUsage#Examples-Attribute (reported in Codeception/codeception.github.com#870).Futhermore, it is currently not possible to use a single
#[Examples]attribute in a test.This PR is based on #6752 which was closed automatically a few months ago and fixed the behavior.
This PR replaces #6789 which is about the same issue.