Skip to content

Responsive - Feature section#525

Merged
Shashankss1205 merged 4 commits intoCodeGraphContext:mainfrom
Sahilbhatane:issue-497
Mar 7, 2026
Merged

Responsive - Feature section#525
Shashankss1205 merged 4 commits intoCodeGraphContext:mainfrom
Sahilbhatane:issue-497

Conversation

@Sahilbhatane
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixed issue #497, Added section padding, adjust text size, and adjust the table structure to be responsive for most of the responsive devices.

image image

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 14, 2026 16:25
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This pull request enhances the responsive design of the feature comparison section to better support mobile and smaller screen devices. The changes focus on improving layout, typography, and spacing across different viewport sizes.

Changes:

  • Replaced inline styles with Tailwind utility classes for responsive padding in the section container
  • Adjusted text sizes and spacing for better mobile readability (headings, paragraphs, badges)
  • Restructured table layout with improved responsive wrapper and updated minimum width constraints
  • Standardized cell padding from p-2 to p-3 for more balanced spacing across all table cells

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@Sahilbhatane
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Shashankss1205 done and also this PR #503 is ready.

@Sahilbhatane
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Other comments of copilot can be ignored as they don't align with current responsive design.

@Sahilbhatane
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Shashankss1205 PR is ready.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Shashankss1205 Shashankss1205 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dont think that this helps, the idea was to show the entire table in a single screen rather than horizontal scroll

@Sahilbhatane
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I dont think that this helps, the idea was to show the entire table in a single screen rather than horizontal scroll

Simplest fix would be adding image instead of table, or use cards, how would you like to proceed?

@Shashankss1205
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I think an image would be subjected to blurring on large screens, so any other solution is preferred!

@Sahilbhatane
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Ok I'll try with card layout but it won't be horizontally aligned like it currently is, is it ok? I'll add screenshot here before final changes, or do you want it on discord?

@Shashankss1205
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Anything works

@Shashankss1205
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Sahilbhatane are you still interested in making a correction to this PR?

@Sahilbhatane
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

image

here how it currently looks, i tried this on 390×844
done using grid-cols-[minmax(0,1fr)_minmax(0,1fr)_minmax(0,1fr)_minmax(0,1fr)] and compacted the badges to so it doesn't cause overflow on other comparison's elements

@Sahilbhatane
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Shashankss1205 check above screenshot and if its ok i can commit those changes, also can you add labels to the PR.

@Shashankss1205
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Tbh it doesnt look good. any other suggestions?

@Sahilbhatane
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

If we want side by side comparison then most probably this will be the best solution, but if we divide feature and for each feature have comparison (horizontal comparison) then everything will look clean,
Downsides -

  • Larger area so user needs to scroll more.
  • not everything will be in one view point.

I'll create this version as well and add a screenshot shot here

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel bot commented Feb 11, 2026

@Sahilbhatane is attempting to deploy a commit to the shashankss1205's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@Sahilbhatane
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Screenshot 2026-02-11 162249 Screenshot 2026-02-11 162259

@Sahilbhatane
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Shashankss1205 check Screenshot, do you like this design? i did as i suggested from earlier comment.

@Sahilbhatane
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Shashankss1205 PR is ready to merge can you check the SS to confirm the design? also check #632 is also seems to be important issue and that PR solves it, can you check that as well

@Shashankss1205 Shashankss1205 merged commit 461ea60 into CodeGraphContext:main Mar 7, 2026
4 of 5 checks passed
psihius pushed a commit to psihius/CodeGraphContext that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants