diff options
| author | Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> | 2026-01-27 14:49:23 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> | 2026-02-02 08:15:38 +0100 |
| commit | 0a4524bc69882a4ddb235bb6b279597721bda197 (patch) | |
| tree | 781b258e2daf32281f72650b2b1b6b3192cce9cb | |
| parent | 1799d8abeabc68ec05679292aaf6cba93b343c05 (diff) | |
| download | ipsec-master.tar.gz | |
In packet offload, hardware is responsible to check templates. The
result of its operation is forwarded through secpath by relevant
drivers. That secpath is actually removed in __xfrm_policy_check2().
In case packet is forwarded, this secpath is reset in RX, but pushed
again to TX where policy is rechecked again against dummy secpath
in xfrm_policy_ok().
Such situation causes to unexpected XfrmInTmplMismatch increase.
As a solution, simply skip template mismatch check.
Fixes: 600258d555f0 ("xfrm: delete intermediate secpath entry in packet offload mode")
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c index 62486f86697521..5428185196a1ff 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c @@ -3801,8 +3801,8 @@ int __xfrm_policy_check(struct sock *sk, int dir, struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_tmpl *tp[XFRM_MAX_DEPTH]; struct xfrm_tmpl *stp[XFRM_MAX_DEPTH]; struct xfrm_tmpl **tpp = tp; + int i, k = 0; int ti = 0; - int i, k; sp = skb_sec_path(skb); if (!sp) @@ -3828,6 +3828,12 @@ int __xfrm_policy_check(struct sock *sk, int dir, struct sk_buff *skb, tpp = stp; } + if (pol->xdo.type == XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_PACKET && sp == &dummy) + /* This policy template was already checked by HW + * and secpath was removed in __xfrm_policy_check2. + */ + goto out; + /* For each tunnel xfrm, find the first matching tmpl. * For each tmpl before that, find corresponding xfrm. * Order is _important_. Later we will implement @@ -3837,7 +3843,7 @@ int __xfrm_policy_check(struct sock *sk, int dir, struct sk_buff *skb, * verified to allow them to be skipped in future policy * checks (e.g. nested tunnels). */ - for (i = xfrm_nr-1, k = 0; i >= 0; i--) { + for (i = xfrm_nr - 1; i >= 0; i--) { k = xfrm_policy_ok(tpp[i], sp, k, family, if_id); if (k < 0) { if (k < -1) @@ -3853,6 +3859,7 @@ int __xfrm_policy_check(struct sock *sk, int dir, struct sk_buff *skb, goto reject; } +out: xfrm_pols_put(pols, npols); sp->verified_cnt = k; |