Subject: FlyBase query
Dear Dr. Goldstein,
I am curating your paper for FlyBase:
Goldstein et al., 2001, Molec. Genet. Genomics 266(4): 695--700
and I have a few questions. Sorry it has taken us so long to get to
your paper, we got a little behind with MGG.
..
The names of the alleles given in Table 1. of your MGG paper are
very similar to those in Figure 9. of:
Currie and Sullivan, 1994, J. Biol. Chem. 269(40): 24679--24687
and in that JBC paper they reference your 1993 ADRC abstract:
Goldstein et al., 1993, A. Dros. Res. Conf. 34: 301
'Further studies on the Drosophila homolog of the Jun oncogene.'
Here is a Table listing the symbols in the Currie and Sullivan paper
and the allele from Table 1 of your MGG paper that I think the Currie
and Sullivan alleles correspond to:
| Currie and | allele from Table 1 |
| Sullivan | of your MGG paper |
| | (complementation group|
| | in brackets) |
\------------------------------------------
Fig 9A| 1.2 | 1-2 (A)
| 1.11 | not in Table 1
| 5.2 | 5-2 (G)
| 5.3 | 5-3 (E)
| 5.11 | 5-11 (K)
| 6.6 | 6-6 (B)
| 7.12 | 7-12 (I)
| 10.5 | 10-5 (B or F ..)
| 10.9 | 10-9 (F)
| 12.6 | 12-6 (D)
| 14.10 | 14-10 (F)
| 14.39 | 14-39 (L)
| 15.4 | 15-4 (B)
| 17.5 | 17-5 (M)
| 19.22 | 19-22 (N)
| 20.10 | 20-10 (O)
| 20.35 | 20-35 (F)
| 21.15 | 21-15 (J)
| 22.21 | 22-21 (C)
| 22.26 | 22-26 (I)
| 24.15 | 24-15 (P)
| 28.19 | not in Table 1
| 29.26 | 29-26 (R)
| x-1 | Df(2R)X1
\------------------------------------------
Fig9B | 8.1 | not in Table 1
| 8.4 | 8-4 (B)
| 9.24 | 9-24 (B)
| 14.35 | 14-35 (B)
| 19.51 | 19-51 (B)
| 21.25 | not in Table 1
| 21.30 | not in Table 1
| 29.42 | 29-42 (B)
| 80.30 | not in Table 1
| 83.21 | not in Table 1
\------------------------------------------
The difference seems to be that Currie and Sullivan used a '.' where
you used a '-'. I suspect that this means that the complementation
groups in Figure 9. of the Currie and Sullivan paper do correspond to
alleles listed in Table 1. of your paper, which means I could merge
several gene records in FlyBase. However, I wanted to make sure that my
hunch was correct before I do this. Do you have any information that
might help me confirm that the complementation groups given in Figure
9. of the Currie and Sullivan, 1994 paper are the same as in Table 1.
of your MGG paper, for example, did you give them these particular
stocks ?
..
Gillian
\--------------------------------------------------------------
Gillian Millburn.
FlyBase (Cambridge),
\--------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: FlyBase query
sorry for taking so long in getting back to you, this has been a busy
semester. if any of this is still unclear, let me know.
elliott goldstein
Gillian Millburn (Genetics) wrote:
>Dear Dr. Goldstein,
>
>I am curating your paper for FlyBase:
>
>Goldstein et al., 2001, Molec. Genet. Genomics 266(4): 695--700
>
>and I have a few questions. Sorry it has taken us so long to get to
>your paper, we got a little behind with MGG.
>
..
> The names of the alleles given in Table 1. of your MGG paper are
>very similar to those in Figure 9. of:
>
>Currie and Sullivan, 1994, J. Biol. Chem. 269(40): 24679--24687
>
>and in that JBC paper they reference your 1993 ADRC abstract:
>
>Goldstein et al., 1993, A. Dros. Res. Conf. 34: 301
>'Further studies on the Drosophila homolog of the Jun oncogene.'
>
>Here is a Table listing the symbols in the Currie and Sullivan paper
>and the allele from Table 1 of your MGG paper that I think the Currie
>and Sullivan alleles correspond to:
>
> | Currie and | allele from Table 1 |
> | Sullivan | of your MGG paper |
> | | (complementation group|
> | | in brackets) |
>------------------------------------------
>Fig 9A| 1.2 | 1-2 (A)
> | 1.11 | not in Table 1
> | 5.2 | 5-2 (G)
> | 5.3 | 5-3 (E)
> | 5.11 | 5-11 (K)
> | 6.6 | 6-6 (B)
> | 7.12 | 7-12 (I)
> | 10.5 | 10-5 (B or F ..)
> | 10.9 | 10-9 (F)
> | 12.6 | 12-6 (D)
> | 14.10 | 14-10 (F)
> | 14.39 | 14-39 (L)
> | 15.4 | 15-4 (B)
> | 17.5 | 17-5 (M)
> | 19.22 | 19-22 (N)
> | 20.10 | 20-10 (O)
> | 20.35 | 20-35 (F)
> | 21.15 | 21-15 (J)
> | 22.21 | 22-21 (C)
> | 22.26 | 22-26 (I)
> | 24.15 | 24-15 (P)
> | 28.19 | not in Table 1
> | 29.26 | 29-26 (R)
> | x-1 | Df(2R)X1
>------------------------------------------
>Fig9B | 8.1 | not in Table 1
> | 8.4 | 8-4 (B)
> | 9.24 | 9-24 (B)
> | 14.35 | 14-35 (B)
> | 19.51 | 19-51 (B)
> | 21.25 | not in Table 1
> | 21.30 | not in Table 1
> | 29.42 | 29-42 (B)
> | 80.30 | not in Table 1
> | 83.21 | not in Table 1
>------------------------------------------
>
>The difference seems to be that Currie and Sullivan used a '.' where
>you used a '-'. I suspect that this means that the complementation
>groups in Figure 9. of the Currie and Sullivan paper do correspond to
>alleles listed in Table 1. of your paper, which means I could merge
>several gene records in FlyBase. However, I wanted to make sure that my
>hunch was correct before I do this. Do you have any information that
>might help me confirm that the complementation groups given in Figure
>9. of the Currie and Sullivan, 1994 paper are the same as in Table 1.
>of your MGG paper, for example, did you give them these particular
>stocks ?
>
these should all correspond to our abstracts (although minor updating
occurred) and our MGG paper. mutants 1-11, 8-1 and 83-21 were removed
when we became convinced they were a double mutants. ..
28-19 should be 28-20.
>
..
>
>Gillian
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------
>Gillian Millburn.
>
>FlyBase (Cambridge),
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------
>
\--
Elliott S. Goldstein
School of Life Science
Cellular, Molecular and Bioscience Program
Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ 85287-4501