Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

WikiProject Plants

Main page

Talk

Taxon template

Botanist template

Resources

Events

Requests

New articles

Index

WikiProject Plants was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 17 December 2007.

Archives since 2011

54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63
64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73
74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be auto-archived by if there are more than 6.

Requested move at Talk:Rhodanthe#Requested move 26 October 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Rhodanthe#Requested move 26 October 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 15:01, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

Hello,
Please note that Crop, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!
_{Delivered by — MusikBot ^talk 00:05, 10 November 2025 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team}[reply]

Discussion at Spongy tissue

You are invited to join the discussion at Spongy tissue, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. nomen alternativum (he/him • talk • contribs) 22:51, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is an AfD discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cneoridium dumosum (Nuttall) Hooker F. Collected March 26, 1960 etc. which may be of interest to this Wikiproject. The full name of the article under question is Cneoridium dumosum (Nuttall) Hooker F. Collected March 26, 1960, at an Elevation of about 1450 Meters on Cerro Quemazón, 15 Miles South of Bahía de Los Angeles, Baja California, México, Apparently for a Southeastward Range Extension of Some 140 Miles, and was nominated on November 12, 2025

They nommed it there then. Randy Kryn (talk) 07:17, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion of Echinopsis

PoWO now accepts a broad circumscription of Echinopsis, apparently based on de Vos et al. (2025),^[1] which offers a full revised classification of the family Cactaceae. In particular, Lobivia, Trichocereus, Soehrensia, and Chamaecereus are all now subsumed into Echinopsis. I think the first three at least should be treated as historically recognized genera if we follow PoWO (as we usually do, and it seems to be based on a major paper). I've sorted out Lobivia and Trichocereus, but need to get back to some other stuff rather than tackle Soehrensia right now. I hope someone here has time and energy to work on this!

References

^ de Vos, Jurriaan M.; Eggli, Urs; Nyffeler, Reto; Larridon, Isabel; McGinnie, Catherine; Epitawalage, Niroshini; Maurin, Olivier; Forest, Félix & Baker, William J. (2025), "Phylogenomics and classification of Cactaceae based on hundreds of nuclear genes", Plant Systematics and Evolution, 311 28, doi:10.1007/s00606-025-01948-z

Peter coxhead (talk) 10:32, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Liliaceae

Liliaceae has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:19, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[deVoEgglNyffLarr25-1] Vos, Jurriaan M.; Eggli, Urs; Nyffeler, Reto; Larridon, Isabel; McGinnie, Catherine; Epitawalage, Niroshini; Maurin, Olivier; Forest, Félix & Baker, William J. (2025), "Phylogenomics and classification of Cactaceae based on hundreds of nuclear genes", Plant Systematics and Evolution, 311 28, doi:10.1007/s00606-025-01948-z

[1]