Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Human rights

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Human rights and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Shortcut

WT:HRWT:HR

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13: 3 months

WikiProject Human rights was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 10 December 2012.

Request for assistance on a new article, Draft:Right to Read inquiry report

Hello. I am looking for some help in approving an article I sumitted on July 20, 2025. The title is Draft:Right to Read inquiry report. Following the suggestions of two editors, I added many new citations and additional content, and rewrote some sections to be more encyclopedic. I believe the draft should meet the criteria to be published. Can someone please take a look and either approve the article or give me some suggestions for improvement? Thank you. John NH (talk) 13:48, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hyderabad massacres

Request for input at a discussion taking place regarding a content dispute of Hyderabad massacres at Talk:Hyderabad massacres#POV and citation check. EarthDude (wanna talk?) 21:14, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Template talk:Discrimination § Scope: Articles on discriminatory subjects

You are invited to join the discussion at Template talk:Discrimination § Scope: Articles on discriminatory subjects, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 17:18, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hindu revolution for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hindu revolution is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu revolution until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— EarthDude (wanna talk?) 11:05, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Peon#Requested move 21 October 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Peon#Requested move 21 October 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 21:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Knowledge of the Holocaust in Nazi Germany and German-occupied Europe#Requested move 19 October 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Knowledge of the Holocaust in Nazi Germany and German-occupied Europe#Requested move 19 October 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 02:01, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Masalit massacres (2023–present) has an RfC

See here please. David A (talk) 08:19, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#RfC on gender exploratory therapy as a form of conversion therapy

There is an ongoing RfC at NPOVN on whether gender exploratory therapy should be described as a form of conversion therapy. Editors interested in the issue are welcome to comment. TarnishedPath^talk 06:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for R v Thomas

R v Thomas has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:41, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Flight of Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians#Requested move 9 November 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Flight of Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians#Requested move 9 November 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 01:08, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Start Movement

It appears this article has been rated C-class because of term confusion with related articles. All of the information in the article has been subject to multiple peer-reviews. ~2025-35814-70 (talk) 15:06, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think the rating is fair. Multiple statements are uncited, many others clearly read as ad copy, there are multiple cleanup tags (some of which I added after assessing the article), and I do not see what you mean by all information being subject to peer review. Per the talk page, no peer review of the page have been done. Unless you mean that the sources are all peer reviewed, which many are not (and at least one comes from an unreliable source, the International Business Times). Spookyaki (talk) 17:59, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The rating is consistent with the ORES rating. Peaceray (talk) 03:20, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Slavery in Finland#Requested move 29 November 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Slavery in Finland#Requested move 29 November 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 02:06, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Mam Sonando

Mam Sonando has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 13:47, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Freedom of political communication § Requested move 5 December 2025

An editor has requested that Talk:Freedom of political communication be moved to Implied freedom of political communication, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. Qwerty123M (talk) 02:20, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union

Political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:42, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]