Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcuts
WikiProject Stub sorting
Information
Project page talk
- Stub types (sections) talk
- Stub types (full list) talk
- To do talk
- Naming conventions talk
- Redirects category talk
Wikipedia:Stub talk
Discussion
Proposals (A) talk
- Current month
Discussion talk
Criteria (A) (discontinued) talk
Deletion (Log) (discontinued) talk
Category

On this WikiProject Stub sorting subpage, you can propose new stub types (please read the procedures beforehand!), as well as the reorganization and subdivision of existing stub types. You can also discuss anything else related to stubs on the talk page.

Proposing new stub types – procedure

[edit]

Important: If you wish to propose the creation of a stub article you've come to the wrong place. If you don't have a username yourself, please go to WP:AFC for proposing a new article. If you already have a username, you can create the article yourself. If you don't know how, add {{Helpme}} to your user talk page to request help from other editors. This page only deals with stub templates and categories; we cannot help you with creating articles.

Proposing new stub types
If you wish to propose a new stub category and template, please follow these procedures:
  1. Check the List of stub types or under Category:Stub categories to make sure that your proposed new stub does not already exist.
  2. List it at the top of the current month's section, under a header, like the ones shown (if any). Sign it with a datestamp (~~~~).
    • Please bear in mind that a stub category isn't about the importance or notability of the topic!
  3. Find a good number[1] of stub articles, as many as you can, that will fit that template. You may use this tool to scan through categories; tagged stubs are always in Category:All stub articles and transclude {{asbox}}. Each of these articles can be:
    • currently marked with {{stub}};
    • currently marked with another type of stub tag (in which case you should justify why your tag is better for the article than the current one);
    • a stub whose categorisation is highly ambiguous or questionable;
    • not marked as a stub.
  4. If you use any category scan (from the tool mentioned above or from any other), please link to it so that other users can confirm that the results are still accurate.
  5. Others may do the same, if they so desire.
  6. 5 days after listing it here, if there is general approval or no objection, go ahead and create the new category and/or template following the format on Wikipedia:Stub. List the new stub type on the stub types list in an appropriate section. If consensus is not clear, or discussion is still ongoing, the proposal will remain open until consensus can be reached.
  7. If you wish to propose a stub type which does not currently have 60 articles that could use it, you may propose an upmerged template in a similar way. An upmerged template would feed into currently existing stub categories until such time that there are enough stubs for a separate stub category. At that point a category for it may be separately proposed. Some times, it may be difficult to be sure how many stubs would get a tag - in which case you can also start with an upmerged stub tag until you're sure there are enough.

DO NOT place a proposal here for any stub type which has already been created and is being discussed at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. The proposal page is only for stub types that have not yet been created, and it is better to keep any discussion of such stub types in one place rather than splitting it between different pages. Wikipedia:Categories for discussion is the correct page for proposals to delete a stub type.

^ Good number means about 60 articles or more, or 30 or more if it is the primary stub type of a WikiProject, though this figure may vary from case to case.

"Speedy creation"

[edit]

A stub type may be proposed for "speedy creation" if it meets one of the following criteria:

  • S1 - the creation of a category for which an approved upmerged template already exists and is now in use on more than 60 articles.
  • S2 - the creation of an upmerged national-level template for a subject in which other such national-level templates currently exist (e.g., X-bio-stub, X-hist-stub, or X-geo-stub, where X is the name of an internationally widely recognised country) or other instances where a clearly established pattern of similar subtypes exists. The proposed topic may not be controversial in scope.

List speedy creation proposals in the same proposal listings as normal stub proposals below.

Proposals, November 2025

[edit]

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

NEW PROPOSALS

[edit]

This weeks speedies

[edit]

This weeks list

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Split of 1910s drama films

[edit]

Not sure about this one but given the fact that there are over 1000 articles here. the following would take over 400 articles:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Split of 1960s Italian film stubs

[edit]

Category over 500, could do with a cull I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Split of 1970s Italian film stubs

[edit]

Category over 500, could do with a cull I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Split of 1920s British film stubs

[edit]

Category over 500, could do with a cull I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Split of 1930s British film stubs

[edit]

Category over 500, could do with a cull I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Split of 1930s French Film stubs

[edit]

Over 600 articles I propose the following split, that should halve the category:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Split of Musical film stubs

[edit]

Over 500 articles I propose the following split by decade:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Split of Musical comedy film stubs

[edit]

Over 500 articles I propose the following split by decade, and subcat to the above:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

US state house politicians

[edit]

A couple of US states have already had there politician stub categories split out members of the state senate and state house, 4 of these are now over 500, i propose following Wisconsin's example and splitting by party:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic party member of the Wisconsin State Assembly stubs

[edit]

Having mentioned the Wisonsin State Assembly above, the Demoocrats could do with a cull, following their Republican colleagues I propose a by decade of birth split such as:

templates for all decades we have articles with categories for those that reach 60. Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposals, October 2025

[edit]

Speedy

[edit]

Just the onetwo this week

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:48, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Negro league baseball outfielder stubs

[edit]

I have just pushed this one over 500 by sorting out its parent, we could do with culling it by decade of birth, just like the pitchers anad infielders, for example:

template for each decade that we have articles and categories for those that pass the 60 mark. Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support all of the proposals :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:20, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Polish actor stubs

[edit]

Over 500, could do with a cull, propose following precedent with the following:

TV and voice actors are showing as short of the 60 but propose categories for iff they reach 60 when sorted. Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agapanthiini stubs

[edit]

Category is over 700 articles I propose following the permcats and splitting as follows:

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Various US politician splits

[edit]

A number of US states have politician cateogries that have passed the 500 mark, I propose we split these by members of the states senate and house.

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Split of North Dakota

[edit]

All the counties have templates, I propose the following breakdown based on this image

Regions of North Dakota

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support ravioli, ravioli, please make the categories! :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:53, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Split of South Dakota

[edit]

All the counties have templates, I propose the following split based on this image

Regions of South Dakota

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Split of Oklahoma

[edit]

All the counties have templates, I propose the following split based on this image

Regions of South Dakota

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Split of New Mexico

[edit]

All the counties have templates, I propose the following split based on this image

Regions of South Dakota

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kentucky geography stubs

[edit]

Category already has some splits I propose the following based on the fact that we still have 700 articles in the main category

Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trechinae sub-stub

[edit]

I propose the following split for Trechinae stubs:

More Tephritinae sub-stubs

[edit]

Propose splitting up Tephritinae stubs accordingly:

Support Anouther one that is definitly needed and looks good. Waacstats (talk) 21:36, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I also plan on making Myopitini stubs ({{Myopitini-stub}}), which will have Urophora stubs, among other articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:56, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cassidinae sub-stubs, part 2

[edit]

Cassidinae stubs is still pretty beefy; I propose the following splits:

Support This looks good and defintly needed. Waacstats (talk) 21:36, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Negro league baseball infielder stubs

[edit]

Another one closing in on 600 culling it by decade of birth for example:

template for each decade that we have articles and categories for those that pass the 60 mark Waacstats (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per usual :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:54, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese baseball pitcher stubs

[edit]

Another one over 500 culling it by decade of birth for example:

template for each decade that we have articles and categories for those that pass the 60 mark Waacstats (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch football biography stubs

[edit]

A football biography category which we have already split by position, however a couple of these have gotten a bit sizeable and could do with a further split, following multiple precedents by decade of birth, for example:

template for each decade that we have articles and categories for those that pass the 60 mark Waacstats (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

American golf tournament stubs

[edit]

OVer 500 and could do with a cull,

Waacstats (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kabaddi players

[edit]

We have over 100 stub articles relating to kabaddi players, I therefore propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support ravioli ravioli, bring on the categories :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:00, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks speediable finds

Waacstats (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support getting on it right now - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:30, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Tephritinae sub-stubs

[edit]

Tephritinae stubs is looking pretty big; I propose the following splits:

Support a good one to reduce at 1400 articles total. Waacstats (talk) 16:11, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Central Bosnia Canton geography sub-stubs

[edit]

Central Bosnia Canton geography stubs is pretty big; I propose the following split:

Support No issues here, again might be an idea to have all the municipalities.Waacstats (talk) 16:09, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zenica-Doboj Canton geography sub-stubs

[edit]

Zenica-Doboj Canton geography stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following splits:

Support is it worth doing templates for the other municipalites? Waacstats (talk) 16:10, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ardabil province geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Ardabil province geography stubs deserves some extra splits:

Looks good, can i suggest we add temmplates for the Counties that dont make 60. Waacstats (talk) 16:08, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Louisiana geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

We have split Louisiana by parish templates but no PArish was big enough for its own category therefore I suggest we split by region based on this image
Regions of Louisiana

{{BienvilleParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{BossierParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{CaddoParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{CaldwellParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{ClaiborneParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{DeSotoParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{EastCarrollParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{FranklinParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{JacksonParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{LincolnParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{MadisonParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{MorehouseParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{OuachitaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{RedRiverParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{RichlandParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{TensasParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{UnionParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{WebsterParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{WestCarrollParishLA-geo-stub}} and {{WinnParishLA-geo-stub}}

{{AllenParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{BeauregardParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{CatahoulaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{ConcordiaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{GrantParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{LaSalleParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{NatchitochesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{RapidesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{SabineParishLA-geo-stub}} and {{VernonParishLA-geo-stub}}

{{AcadiaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{AscensionParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{AssumptionParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{AvoyellesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{CalcasieuParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{CameronParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{EvangelineParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{IberiaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{IbervilleParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{JeffersonDavisParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{LafayetteParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{LafourcheParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{PointeCoupeeParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StCharlesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StJamesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StJohntheBaptistParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StLandryParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StMartinParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StMaryParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{TerrebonneParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{VermilionParishLA-geo-stub}} and {{WestBatonRougeParishLA-geo-stub}}

{{EastBatonRougeParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{EastFelicianaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{LivingstonParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StHelenaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StTammanyParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{TangipahoaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{WashingtonParishLA-geo-stub}} and {{WestFelicianaParishLA-geo-stub}}

{{JeffersonParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{OrleansParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{PlaqueminesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StBernardParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StCharlesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StJamesParishLA-geo-stub}} and {{StJohntheBaptistParishLA-geo-stub}} Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Telecommunication stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
About to break 700 I propose we split out the following categories:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Phytoseiidae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one getting large with two possible splits:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Liberal Party of Australia politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is ready to break into the 600 club, I propose the following splilt:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Australia television show stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Starting to creep up, I propose the following two splits per other countries that we have split:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Australia athletics biographies

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We have another athletics category break the 600 mark, propose we split this like we have with other countries, by event:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Oklahoma and the Dakotas

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Following on from last month, all three states are starting to get large. I would like to propose splitting these with by county templates, categories for any that make 60 and then we can more clearly see what we have regarding regional categories. Templates and categories of the following formats for each county:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:09, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cicindelidae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles, can easily be split by the following two categories:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

speedy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A few speedies for this week:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Compact object stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Compact object stubs ({{compact-object-stub}}) For neutron stars and black holes. Found 76 applicable articles via category search. Shocksingularity (talk) 05:49, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably the parent cat would be Category:Compact stars? Her Pegship (?) 19:28, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, plus possibly some intermediate-mass/supermassive BHs Shocksingularity (talk) 21:11, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hymenobacter stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose making Hymenobacter stubs ({{Hymenobacter-stub}}) for over 60 articles in Cytophagia stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Myrmicinae sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Myrmicinae stubs is pretty big; I propose the following split:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Potter wasp sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Potter wasp stubs is pretty big; I propose the following sub-stub:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cicindelidae sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Cicindelidae stubs is pretty big; I propose the following splits:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Lebiinae sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Lebiinae stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following split:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Trechinae sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Trechinae stubs is pretty beefy, and not in the good way. I propose the following split:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Platyninae sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Platyninae stubs is pretty big; I propose the following split:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Staphyliniformia stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This category/template, Staphyliniformia stubs ({{Staphyliniformia-stub}}) will contain Staphylinoidea stubs and 353 pages - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 23:10, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bostrichoidea sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Bostrichoidea stubs is a little big; I propose the following splits:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Elaphidiini sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Elaphidiini stubs is pretty big; I propose the following:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Saperdini sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Saperdini stubs is pretty beefy. I propose the following subcats/temps:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Onciderini sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Onciderini stubs is pretty big. I propose:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mesosini sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Mesosini stubs is pretty beefy, and not in the good way. I propose:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Agapanthiini sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Agapanthiini stubs is getting really big; I propose the following splits:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Barisal Division geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Barisal Division geography stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following subcats/temps:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposals, September 2025

[edit]

Cambodia geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Cambodia geography stubs is pretty big; I propose the following subcats/temps:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:52, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mersin Province geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Mersin Province geography stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following splits:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:52, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

South Korean railway station sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
South Korean railway station stubs is pretty big; I propose the following subcategories/templates:

Support no issues here that i can see. Waacstats (talk)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Yorkshire and the Humber railway station sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised.
I propose the following as a subcat of Yorkshire and the Humber railway station stubs and Railway stations in Yorkshire:

Given the size of the split is it worth splitting this directly to North/South/West and East Riding? Waacstats (talk) 08:26, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not keen on having Yorkshire railway station stubs as a single sub-group because they make up the vast bulk of Yorkshire and the Humber railway station stubs: there are comparatively few that aren't in Yorkshire. The ones that would be left behind would comprise those in North Lincolnshire (20 stub articles out of 46) together with those in North East Lincolnshire (2 stub articles out of 36), which even taken together don't have many stations. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:30, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Italian railway station sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised.
Italian railway station stubs is pretty big; I propose the following subcategories/templates:

Support the idea here but we normally go with the place name as you have above rather than a demonym. Waacstats (talk) 08:06, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So it would be Lombardy, Apulia, Lazio and Piedmont for the categories, too? - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 23:58, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I would say so, for some reason (lost to time) we have gone with demonym for continent and country level but then place name below that, at least from what I can see. Waacstats (talk) 21:55, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Gaziantep Province geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Gaziantep Province geography stubs is pretty big; I propose the following subcategories/templates:

Altered the Nizip district for you (missed space) other than that these look ok. Waacstats (talk) 07:59, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kastamonu Province geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Kastamonu Province geography stubs is looking pretty big; I propose the following subcats/temps:

Support these. Waacstats (talk) 08:03, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Castilla–La Mancha geography substubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Castilla–La Mancha geography stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following subcats/temps:

Not seeing any issues on these. Waacstats (talk) 08:02, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Basque Country geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Basque Country geography stubs is pretty big; I propose the following splits:

Other than the Basque being a country rather than a county (I changed the category link) these look goods. Waacstats (talk) 08:01, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 15:10, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cassidinae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I have only just proposed a split of this last week and it has doubled in size to over 1200 articles (after I split out 166) I can now find another three genus' that have enough articles for there own templates so propose the following:

These will still leave it oversized but it is a good start. Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support every bit helps! :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:46, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It has gone up to 1900. I propose more:
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 06:49, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support extension of my proposal, hopefully we can get it down somewhere close to a reasonable size. Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

By-elections to the Parliament of the United Kingdom in English constituency stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Starting to get large we have already split out London, I propose we atleast create templates for the other regions and categories for any of those regions that reach 60:

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Colorado, Louisiana and New Mexico

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
All three states are strating to get large. I would like to propose splitting these with by county templates, categories for any that make 60 and then we can more clearly see what we have regarding regional categories. Templates and categories of the following formats:

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but please be a little more specific, if that makes sense. I don't want to accidentally create something generic... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 06:51, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, given the fact that there is about 64, 64 and 33 counties in each I din't really want to write all of them out. I mean that for example taking Santa Fe County, New Mexico I propose we go with Category:Sante Fe County, New Mexico geography stubs and {{SantaFeNM-geo-stub}}. I hope that makes sense. Waacstats (talk) 21:48, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:06, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Idk maybe I can make a Google spreadsheet for all of them? There will be a lot of copypaste involved, but I wanna know what you think - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:07, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Veneto geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another Italian category getting large we have previously split Italian regions by Province so propose we follow suit here.

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bacteroidota stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This category was over 600 till it was sorted, could do with some more sub categories to get it down a bit more, based on the permcat I propose the following:

Also to tidy up the largest subcat I propose

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support the first one has already been created, btw - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:07, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kachin State geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one getting large, we have previously split the Myanmar states by district. This one only has six districts, two of which have categories and seem to have almost all the articles. I propose all the templates anyway just in case someone comes back and finishes these off. As usual templates first categories for those that reach 60:

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I withdrew my version of the request because it was an unintentional duplicate - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 13:45, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cymbidieae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Yet another one that was getting larger. I propose reducing this down with the following

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Italian film actors

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one getting large, propose we follow suit for other nations and split by decade of birth along the lines of:

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but I think we can go all the way for this one:
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:17, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hemilophini stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
creeping up. The following would help prevent that.

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:10, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mississippi politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one getting large, I propose we follow other states and split out the state level politicians

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Tineidae

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Again creeping up, propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:33, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedies

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks list, the 1930s NZ RU bio might be 1 short, but it is close enough and it would look odd going from 20s to 40s, and 1910s is only at 40 so a bit too far away yet.

Waacstats (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bolu Province geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Bolu Province geography stubs is looking pretty big; I propose the following subtemplates/subcategories:

Support, no issues that I can see. I am beginning to wonder if Turkish Provinces are the new French Departments. Waacstats (talk) 13:03, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I hope not - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 06:52, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Waacstats I created them :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:49, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Aegean region geography sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Aegean region geography stubs isn't too big, but I'd like to propose a sub-stub:

Actually, I just took a look at the number of transclusions for that redirect, and it looks like the category should be speedily created - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:46, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Afyonkarahisar Province geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Afyonkarahisar Province geography stubs is pretty beefy; I propose splitting it up into subtemplates/subcategories when needed:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:01, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see anything wrong with these. Waacstats (talk) 19:55, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Scythrididae sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following will be a subcategory of Scythrididae stubs and Scythris:

I have no issues with this one. Waacstats (talk) 20:02, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Xyloryctidae sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following will be a subcategory of Xyloryctidae stubs and Cryptophasa:

Support No issues with this one either. Waacstats (talk) 20:04, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Coleophoridae sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Coleophoridae stubs is a beefy category, because 99% of the articles are coleophora. I propose making {{Coleophora-stub}} (Coleophora stubs) for 1,374 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:56, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

River sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
All of these will be subcategories of their respective "[Country] river stubs" and "[Division] geography stubs" parent categories:

Russia

[edit]

India

[edit]
Although I support these, just a warning, I think the Indian counts might be inflated as there are a number of categories that fall onto one or both of these that arent exclusive, for example, Category:Rivers of the Western Ghats falls into both of these categories and a number of others, Category:Tributaries of the Narmada River is in the MAharashtra and Madhya Pradesh. Also there may be some undercounts as articles have {{Maharashtra-geo-stub}} or one of its subcats. I suggest the old mantra, templates first, categories of they prove to be over 60, just be careful. Waacstats (talk) 21:11, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Lebanon geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised.
Lebanon geography stubs is getting pretty beefy; I propose the following subcats/temps:

I think the template for the last one should be written out in full as {{MountLebanonGovernate-geo-stub}} but otherwise I see no issues with these. Waacstats (talk) 20:56, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

15th-century English MP stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We have split most of the other English MP by century categories by parliament now, only this and the 18th century(7 years) remain. This one is getting large so I propose following the precedent and splitting by parliament. There are a large number of these, nearly enough to have a stub category for the templates, but most categories contain fewer than 60 articles so yes there will be a large overlap but hopefully not too bad. I have proposed all the categories and templates, just incase someone wants to make the missing articles in the mean time.

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:09, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to create these. Please keep in mind that I'm not at home right now - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 13:47, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They've been created. You can request small categories to be deleted once everything is sorted out - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 06:54, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Australia politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
One that keeps creeping up. We have already split out the mayors and diplomats, we have then split out by party and then split one of those parties by where they sit (each state/senate/representative). I can find no party that would pass the 60 mark however I propose we split by state parliment that people sat in, a number of these would already have sub categories as we have split the Labor party politicians. ACT is likely to be too small for a category, the others should easily pass 60

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Polish Sejm member stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one in the 700 range that could do with a trim and this one is only 6 months old. I'm fairly sure we will end up with some multi-stubbing as we do when we split the English mps but by Sejm looks the best way to go. Yes the 1989 Sejm is called the Contract Sejm in both the article and category so I have followed suit, a good encyclopedia will give further information if you wish to read up on the reasoning:

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good to me :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:19, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedies

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A few for this week,

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Great Britain MP (1707–1800) for England stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
We have recently been splitting these categories by parliment, thought it best to follow suit but not really happy with how the names came out, anyone any better ideas. Anyhow the templates and categories would be as follows, given large overlap we should be able to create all the categogries but just in case categories iff the templates reach 60:

Support - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:11, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wait! You misspelled "Britain" in the categories! - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:11, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed it nvm - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:03, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that, can't even spell my home country's name right. God help me. Waacstats (talk) 21:15, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't know you were British! I guess I learn something new every day :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 22:03, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of South Australia geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Similar to Asturias below, we could go with LGA's but I feel there are too many of them and none will reach 60 so I propose the LGA regions, unfortunatly we do not have permcats for these so a hand sort will be needed but I always was a glutton for punishment:

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Aasturias geogrpahy stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This one is closing in on 700 articles, We have a choice of by Comarca or by municipality. It doesn't look like any individual municipality will get over 60 so I propose it would be more sensible to split by Comarca. I did think of using upmerged by munucipality templates as this information is more often included in articles but at 79, it felt like doing a US state split again and I'm not ready for that:

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cycling race stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles, we have already split out some countries and even specific races, I am unable to find any more caountries to split out and therefore propose the following to take caere of any races IN Europe as opposed to just European championships:

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Prešov Region geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Starting to get large at 650, we have a nice by district split that we can use and I therefore propose the following templates, with categories for those that pass the 60 mark:

Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sport of athletics stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Not big enough to need a split but could be tidied up by the following category:

Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Urmia_County_geography_stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, per other Iranian counties I propose splitting by district as follows

This will all require a handsort, but from a quick look most articles have the Bakhsh or District listed, as usual templates first then category. Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
New finds this month:

Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American physicist stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This is another new one to the over 600 list that may be my fault that it grew. I did think that splitting by dob might be the best but as we split the biologists and chemists by areas of interest I propose the same here:

Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cassidinae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another new one heading for the oversized category (773). Looking at the category the following is viable but as no permcats exist I can't give a realible petscan search:

Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Galerucinae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
New one in the oversized category (1015 articles). It looks like following would bring it down to the 700 region:

Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Northern Ontario geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles and deserving of a trim the following appears to be sensible

Not all of these will pass 60 so as usual templates first categories for those that make 60. Waacstats (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cologne S-Bahn stubs

[edit]

Rhine-Ruhr S-Bahn stubs should be split to match the split of the parent article (Rhine-Ruhr S-Bahn) to Cologne S-Bahn.

In the alternative, station articles served by the Cologne S-Bahn and not the Rhine-Ruhr S-Bahn could be upmerged into North Rhine-Westphalia railway station stubs. Mackensen (talk) 01:39, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It doesnt look like there are enough articles for a category, I was going tosuggust we create the template and use that to upmerge to both categories, but I suppose there is no guarentee that all the articles to do with Cologne S-Bahn are stations (different lines, the trains people involved etc). Maybe for now we just put both templates on any that need them. Waacstats (talk) 17:10, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Cologne S-Bahn stubs would only be a subset of North Rhine-Westphalia railway station stubs; I'm fairly certain it doesn't cross into another state. I'll just re-categorize as appropriate. Mackensen (talk) 20:05, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
May I suggest that, since Cologne is a location, we should capitalize the template: {{Cologne-sbahn-stub}}? Also, should "SBahn" also be capitalized in the template? Her Pegship (?) 19:54, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

20th-century painting stubs split

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
20th-century painting stubs should be split up by decade, like its predecessors.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1930s comedy film sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose making 1930s American comedy film stubs ({{1930s-US-comedy-film-stub}}), which will be a subcategory of 1930s comedy film stubs, American comedy film stubs, and 1930s comedy film stubs. 394 articles are waiting for the new template - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 15:28, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposals, August 2025

[edit]

Minas Gerais geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles, this one will be a bit difficult as I cant find a decent category structure to use as a basis for a petscan search, it seems the regions changes in 2017? so a hand search will be needed at least to complete this. Obviously templates first, categories iff they pass 60.

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Erebinae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600, needs a resort as it looks like some genus have moved out of one sub cat, to catch some of this I propose:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support this and all of the below. Helps clean things up :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:53, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Marginellidae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one over 600, looking at the category alot begin Marginella therefore I propose:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hepialidae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles, could do with a trim. the following are viable based on names rather categories:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Pooideae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was crate.
over 600 articles, the following appears viable:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Heterobranchia stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
These are both a bit odd, I have found 200 articles that belong in a sub-category or sub-sub-category the only problem is one is a "Parent only" and therefore don't have a general stub tag, the other is also "parent only" and its stub tag redirects to its grandparent I propose removing the parent only status from the two categories below and creating the matching template to allow articles from smaller sub-categories of the perm cats a way into these categories and un-redirecting the existing template to the correct category:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bombycoidea stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one over 600 articles that could do with a split. I propsoe the following:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American Civil War biography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
over 600 articles, I propose splitting out the soldiers and sailors of either side:

for some reason the category has a lower case a for army inn the Union army category, everything else is uppercase so I have followed suit Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New South Wales geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A good split already started on this +600 category. I propose continuing that split with:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Photography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
another one over 600, could do with a trim. I believe enough of the articles relate to lenses though I think the petscan results include a number of false positives.

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Georgia_(U.S._state)_politician_stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600, could do with a trim I propose following the exammple of many other states and split out the state level politicians. I am not 100% convinced we need the disambig here but thought better to keep it inline with the politician parent:

There will be about 50 overlapping. Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Faboideae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles I have found the following to be large enough:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks finds:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:51, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split in Turkey

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A few Provinces in Turkey have over 600 articles and could do with a split. I propose a split by District as per the already split provinces, not all of these will pass 60 so templates first then categories for those that pass the 60 mark:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support all the geography stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:02, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Two Austrian geo splits

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Both Lower Austria and Styria are starting to get a bit large at over 600 articles. I propose a split by division for both, not all of these will pass 60 so templates first then categories for those that pass the 60 mark:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Võru County geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Pushing 700 articles could do with a split I propose splitting by parish, one of these may be a bit short so templates first, categories iff they reach 60:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Standards and measurement stubs

[edit]

Closing in on 700 articles, I'd like to propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy categories

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I will likely create these when I'm at my computer next time:

Might be worth having the -river-stub for each one double upmerged to there as well as the river category (look at my speedy from last week), might also make a couple of other counties viable?. Waacstats (talk) 08:08, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Spilomelinae sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Some of the stubs in Spilomelinae stubs are of the Hydririni tribe; as such, I'd like to propose a subcategory/template:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:46, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I also plan on making {{Herpetogrammatini-stub}} for those belonging to the following genera of Herpetogrammatini (these don't have their own stub category):
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:04, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Great catch, these need a good breakdown. Waacstats (talk) 08:09, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Coccinellidae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Coccinellidae stubs is hella big; I propose making the following sub-stubs (based on subfamily, tribe, then genera): Coccinellinae stubs, {{Coccinellinae-stub}}

Epilachnini stubs, {{Epilachnini-stub}}

Scymninae stubs, {{Scymninae-stub}}

Sticholotidinae stubs, {{Sticholotidinae-stub}}

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:35, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, however I would suggest making templates for the tribe level, I think there are other genera that could go there and if there aren't now there may be in the future if the biologist decide to move genera around. Waacstats (talk) 08:14, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I just included the tribe templates in my request. I'm getting ready to go to class - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 13:46, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A note to any admins looking for any empty categories: I'm currently working on these, but I'm not at home right now - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:13, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ardabil province geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Main stub category: Ardabil province geography stubs. I'm back before school starts to make proposals:

Looks good, glad to see you back! Waacstats (talk) 08:16, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Crambini stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 650 articles, perm cat has no sub cats however I propose th following based on links to category:

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Flavobacteria stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Safetly in the 600+ articles, I would like to propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tineidae stubs

[edit]

Closing in on 700 I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ulidiidae

[edit]

Another one pushing 700 articles:

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support all of the above :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:00, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Actinomycetota

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Close to 700 articles so could do with a split. I therefore propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Rugby union orgs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Not desperatly needed but will tidy up the parent categories

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per the parent cat & previous stub formats, I think this should be "Rugby union organisation stubs" and "Rugbyunion-org-stub". Her Pegship (?) 19:46, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good spot, I obviously didn't update my quick note to propose it properly. Waacstats (talk) 10:53, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So now should be Rugby union organisation stubs {{Rugbyunion-org-stub}} Waacstats (talk) 11:58, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of steroids

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 600 could do with a split

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedies

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks over 60

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'm creating them right now - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:07, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, @Waacstats, how do you find these large stub templates? I'd love to know :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:08, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They are just ones I come across. I wish I had an easier way of finding them though. Waacstats (talk) 08:04, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedys

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks list of new categories where the associated tempalte(s) have passed the 60 park:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Apocynaceae

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A nother one over 700 pages, I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hypsogastropoda stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This one looks reaady to split, at 668 pages and 51 categories, all the pages are already using by genus(?) templates I propose we use the next layer down that the perm cats use which would mean the following categories:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Limenitidinae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Anouther biological category with over 700 articles. I propose the following split based on perm cats:

I'm not 100% convinced on the name for the second one, I'm not convinced we need the disambig for either the template or the category but the perrm cat uses it so? anyone any ideas? Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Miridae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another over 700, I propose the following based on perm cats:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Milesiini stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is approaching 750 I propose the following based on names and not categories as the parent has no perm sub cats.

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mesostigmata stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another tree of life category pushing 800, I propose the following based on perm cats:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Staphylinidae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Pushing 800 articles, I propose the following splits:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A few speediable categories:

Waacstats (talk) 20:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Large Olympic medalists stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The Dutch, French, German, Swedish and Soviet subcats have recently grown to over 600 and I would like to cut these back a bit. A few other countries could do with a trim as well:

Waacstats (talk) 20:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sports biographies

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A couple of Sports biographies without stub categories. I propose the following category which should be viable based on articles that have asbox (atleast one stub template).

Waacstats (talk) 20:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ascomycota stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This category has a number of large subcats, I would like to propose the following categories and templates

Waacstats (talk) 20:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cumberland geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, we have 2 non-metropolitan I propose using these to split them.

I have followed the article and permcat for disambiging Cumberland UA nd historic county. Waacstats (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Theclinae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, could do with a split:

All appear viable per the parent cats. Waacstats (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Protein stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 800 articles we already of 1 split by location so I thought the following would be useful, it will still be oversized but not not quite so oversized

Waacstats (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy categories

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
some upmerged templates that have passed the 60 mark.

and some categories each from a number of templates:

Waacstats (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Biologist

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Some refining is possible with the following:

Waacstats (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposals, July 2025

[edit]

Canada lake stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Canada lake stubs should be split into subcategories:

this looks good to me.Waacstats (talk) 18:15, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A few speediable categories unless anyone has any objections:

Waacstats (talk) 13:17, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support these look good, just be sure to add WikiProjects in the talk pages (if possible). Thanks for keeping this WikiProject alive! - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 22:46, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I really hope this is the last of them...

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I'm getting really tired of restubbing all of these French geography articles, so here's hopefully the last of them before I stop making these for good. Meuse (department) geography stubs has over 500 articles, so I'm splitting this up by arrondissement:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:04, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, There are still plently of departments to split by arrondissement if you want, just none of them look too large at the moment. Waacstats (talk) 13:14, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm definitely not going to split them up at this time. I'll get started with creating the templates and categories (old and new) soon, so be prepared to do a lot of sorting... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:19, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Iran road stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose making a stub category for Iran geography stubs, Asia road stubs and Iran transport stubs: Iran road stubs! {{Iran-road-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:03, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good to me. Waacstats (talk) 13:15, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm currently organizing the road stub templates right now, starting with the Asian section - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:22, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mine stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Hi all - there are over 500 stubs relating to locations of ore extraction (as opposed to any other type of mine :)) in Category:Mine stubs. A couple of by-country subcats have already been split out. I'd like to add a few upmerged national templates, and new subcats for any which reach the magical 60 mark. The following would be instantly useful...

...and it's likely that a few more useful ones will become obvious when I start to sort. Any objections? Grutness...wha? 15:25, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support! Her Pegship (?) 19:26, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Peg - good to see you're still active at WPSS! :) Grutness...wha? 03:23, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
'::waves:: Her Pegship (?) 23:28, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:04, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support, this is beginning to feel like the old days. Waacstats (talk) 13:11, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt I'll ever get back to that level of stubbing again :) Grutness...wha? 13:57, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Except I'm here to help! - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:26, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome! Good to see a new "stub obsessive" :) Grutness...wha? 01:25, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A stubsessive - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:26, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: I'm also creating {{Ukraine-mine-stub}} and {{Mongolia-mine-stub}} - there are a surprising number of Mongolian ones! Grutness...wha? 07:16, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Both Canada and the US reached 60 stubs, so I've also created categories for them. Grutness...wha? 11:05, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Burmese film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose making Burmese film stubs for {{Myanmar-film-stub}}; there are over 200 articles waiting to be moved to a more specific category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 23:16, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support seems a good split to me. Waacstats (talk) 13:16, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposals, June 2025

[edit]

Another German geography stub proposal

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Hesse geography stubs is looking a bit chubby; I propose making Hesse mountain stubs ({{Hesse-mountain-stub}}) for 114 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:55, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Baden-Württemberg mountain stubs ({{BadenWürttemberg-mountain-stub}}) should likewise be created for 132 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:56, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Again support follows precedant Waacstats (talk) 12:52, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A speedy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Create Rhineland-Palatinate river stubs for {{RhinelandPalatinate-river-stub}}, making it a subcat of Rhineland-Palatinate geography stubs and Germany river stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:52, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Follows precedent. Waacstats (talk) 12:51, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Alabama Registered Historic Place stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another category over the 700 mark, I propose splitting this up by county template with the counties grouped as per Category:Alabama geography stubs. I have run out of energy for typing them up, so if anyone wants them all typed up, tough, honestly I will have them here before I start but just look at the geo cat for now. Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Idaho Registered Historic Place stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one over 700, we don't have a decent split of the geo category, in fact we need to look at getting rid of some undersize county categories at some point. I propose templates for the counties and then see if between the geos and the NRHP we can come up with some regions to use.Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Georgia (U.S. state) Registered Historic Place stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, I propose splitting by county templates grouped per the geography stubs. It seems a bit overkill but... Georgia (U.S. state) Registered Historic Place stubs - {{GeorgiaUS-NRHP-stub}}

Atlanta Metropolitan Area Registered Historic Place stubs - {{BarrowCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BartowCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ButtsCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CarrollCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CherokeeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CobbCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CowetaCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DawsonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DeKalbCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DouglasCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{FayetteCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ForsythCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{FultonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GwinnettCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{HaralsonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{HeardCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{NewtonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PauldingCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PickensCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PolkCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{RockdaleCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{SpaldingCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WaltonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

Central Georgia Registered Historic Place stubs - {{BaldwinCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BibbCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BleckleyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CrawfordCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DodgeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{HoustonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{JonesCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LaurensCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{MonroeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PeachCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PulaskiCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PutnamCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TaylorCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TwiggsCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{UpsonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WilkinsonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

Central Savannah River Area Registered Historic Place stubs - {{BurkeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ColumbiaCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GlascockCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{HancockCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{JeffersonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{JenkinsCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LincolnCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{McDuffieCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{RichmondCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TaliaferroCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WarrenCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WashingtonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WilkesCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

Coastal Georgia Registered Historic Place stubs - {{BryanCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BullochCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CandlerCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ChathamCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{EffinghamCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{EvansCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LibertyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LongCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{McIntoshCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ScrevenCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TatnallCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

North Georgia Registered Historic Place stubs - {{CatoosaCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ChattoogaCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DadeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{FanninCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{FloydCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GilmerCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GordonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{HabershamCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LumpkinCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{MurrayCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{RabunCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{StephensCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TownsCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{UnionCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WalkerCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

Southeast Georgia Registered Historic Place stubs - {{ApplingCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{AtkinsonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BaconCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BerrienCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BrantleyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BrooksCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CamdenCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CharltonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ClinchCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CoffeeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CookCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{EcholsCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GlynnCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{JeffDavisCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LanierCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LowndesCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PierceCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WareCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WayneCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

Southwest Georgia Registered Historic Place stubs - {{BakerCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CalhounCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ColquittCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DecaturCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DoughertyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{EarlyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GradyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LeeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{MillerCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{MitchellCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{SeminoleCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TerrellCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ThomasCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WorthCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

Why do US States require so many counties?Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support idk but you gotta do what you gotta do - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:57, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Indian film actor subs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Still over 600. I propose following the US with a by decade of birth split along the lines of:

Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support gets them off the list - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:57, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Oregon Registerd Historic Places stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Comfortably over 700, fortunately Portland has a very big chunk of these I propose the following:

Also if we are splitting by county may as well do the others for later ease

Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Texas Registered Historic Place stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is at over 600, could do with a trim beforeir gets any bigger, unfortunatly Texas has a lot of counties. I have based this proposal on the existing split of the geo stubs. I believe all the categories will reach 60 but not sure all the templates will be required so whoever creates this (thats probably me) should only ccreate the categories as they are needed.

Texas Registered Historic Place stubs - {{Texas-NRHP-stub}}

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

speedy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks list of speedies

Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should the third-to-last category be called "Irish baronet stubs" instead? idk - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:02, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Actually never mind; I still support the last three categories (they still need to be created btw) - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:03, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Iranian politician stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 600 and could do with a trim, I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

German writer stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles I propose the folowing:

Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good to me! Please be sure to include WikiProjects - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 09:44, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

German film actor subs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
over 700. I propose following the US with a by decade of birth split along the lines of:

Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Canadian screen actor subs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
over 700. I propose following the US with a by decade of birth split along the lines of:

Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should that be Canadian screen actor, 1960s birth stubs? Her Pegship (?) 20:33, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it should, Good spot, thankyou. Waacstats (talk) 20:06, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

speedy

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks list of speedies

Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Indian actor stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Following a sort of this category that pushed the film subcat over 600, partly because unlike other countries where we have split actors we don't have an Indian screen actor stubs to put those who do film and tv, I therefore propose the following:

And because there were a number of stage performers I propose the following, it might not yet reach 60 but should do once we sort through the parent.

Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Yemen geography substubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Yemen geography stubs is oversized; I propose these categories:

Support, that 'Amran one is going to be a pain. I feel it may be worth doing templates for all the governates so counting is easier in the future. Waacstats (talk) 07:16, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Purba Bardhaman district geography stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
West Bengal railway station stubs is oversized; I propose making a subcategory and template (Purba Bardhaman district geography stubs and {{PurbaBardhaman-railstation-stub}}) for 65 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:44, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I assume the category should be Purba Bardhaman district railway station stubs otherwise support. Waacstats (talk) 14:52, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah you're right - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:11, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy parent category proposal

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose the creation of Ibidionini stubs, which will be a subcat of Ibidionini and hold the categories Compsibidion stubs, Heterachthes stubs, and Tropidion stubs, which I believe have been incorrectly categorized as part of Neoibidionini stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:06, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks like the perm cats were changed back in October, probably some reorganistaion carried out. Waacstats (talk) 07:20, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Buprestidae sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as Buprestidae-genera-stub.
I propose the following sub-stubs for Buprestidae stubs:

I feel there should be a dash in the template before genera otherwise Support Waacstats (talk) 14:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What Waacstats said. Her Pegship (?) 21:30, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ammonite sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category:Ammonite stubs (1,030) is looking extra thicc; I propose splitting it off based on taxonomy:

I think it would also help to Courtesy ping: Fadesga for this one, since he was the one who made those template redirects in the first place - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:37, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming the paleo people are happy with this Support. Waacstats (talk) 13:50, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Epidendreae sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Epidendreae stubs is oversized; I propose breaking the category up a little more:

Pleurothallidinae stubs

[edit]
Acianthera stubs
[edit]
Support all looks good. Waacstats (talk) 13:47, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Acrotaeniini stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the 125 articles awaiting the new template and subcategory of Tephritinae stubs and Acrotaeniini - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:58, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well Found Support Waacstats (talk) 13:46, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals&oldid=1319928220"