Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Main page Articles for improvement Article nominations Schedule Assessment Accomplishments Automation & templates Participants Talk page 
Shortcuts

This page is for nominating articles to be listed as articles for improvement, from which the weekly collaborations are pulled. Any article or list on Wikipedia can be nominated, although articles that do not meet the suggested criteria are unlikely to gain consensus.


Instructions

[edit]

Suggested criteria

[edit]

Though there are no firm criteria, in general, ideal AFI articles are:

  • Highly important topics. Anything that has top or high importance to a WikiProject is likely highly important.
  • Interesting to the general public. This can be evidenced by page views. Nominations with less than 200 views per day rarely succeed.
  • Needing of improvement, with expansion opportunity. Stubs; start-class, and short C-class articles are the most ideal for improvement. Give due consideration before nominating higher-quality articles.
  • Not targets of controversy. Keep in mind that controversial articles (articles that are the subject of heated discussion, edit warring, or questioned notability) can be very difficult to improve within a week.

Review process

[edit]
  • Any user may vote on the suitability of nominations to be listed at AFI.
  • Please use the code #'''Support''' or #'''Oppose''', add your reasoning, and sign with ~~~~. You may also add comments. Improperly formatted votes may be missed by the bot.
  • MusikBot will mark nominations with at least 3 net support votes (3 more support votes than oppose votes) as approved and those with at least 3 net oppose votes as unapproved. The bot will automatically list successful nominations and archive all closed nominations.
  • Registered members of the project may choose to override the bot at their discretion in instances where straight vote totals do not appear to reflect community consensus.

Nominating an article

[edit]
  1. Check that the article you want to nominate isn't already listed.
  2. Post the nomination at the top of the list in the appropriate category, using this code: 
    ===(Article title)===
{{AFI nom|article=(Article title)|class=unknown|hits=(Number of daily hits)}}
*(Nomination text) ~~~~
  3. Fill out the parts in parentheses. You can find an article's class on its talk page and its approximate daily hits using this tool.
  4. Please do not support your own nominations.

Nominations

[edit]

Applied sciences and technology

[edit]

Human settlement

[edit]

Human settlement – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 240 daily hits

  • This article, like any other level-2 vital article, could be an FA, but instead we have a barely informative, low C-leveled page. It needs a lot of expansion, as well as more citations and some trimming of country-related material. Somepinkdude (talk) 15:38, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 00:20, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Microcar

[edit]

Microcar – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 189 daily hits

  1. Support, it is a vital article. SVcode(Talk) 21:30, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place here to know if the article will keep being VA. Comment if you are interested! @SVcode: Earth605 (talk) 05:41, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:50, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Detonation

[edit]

Detonation – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 137 daily hits

  1. Support - expansion could be done.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:00, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose: I can't see any vital problem with this article. Purely long enough with good sourcing. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 00:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support 2 thirds of the article are lead. Per nom and BabbaQ. Earth605 (talk) 09:36, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rail Transport

[edit]

Rail Transport – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 734 daily hits

  1. Support per nom. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 00:47, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 07:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose, strongly. Rail topics benefit massively from systemic bias — they are the exact opposite of the area we should be focusing attention on with this project. The article isn't featured but is in perfectly decent shape. Sdkb talk 20:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose - agree with above; rail transport has a lot of enthusiasts already, and this could go to the relevant Wikiproject I think. Stockhausenfan (talk) 10:47, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose per Sdkb, WP:TRAIN can take this on. GoldRomean (talk) 01:09, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arts

[edit]

The arts

[edit]

The arts – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 562 daily hits

  1. Oppose, article looks decent enough. Not much AFI can do. SVcode(Talk) 23:04, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Duck

[edit]

Donald Duck – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 855 daily hits

  • This Character is important (Level 4) Aomaf (talk), 17:11, 26 September 2025 (CET)
  1. Oppose, article is decent. SVcode(Talk) 00:13, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:03, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Markiplier

[edit]

Markiplier – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 4,239 daily hits

  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 00:21, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Everyday life

[edit]

Vancouver International Airport

[edit]

Vancouver International Airport – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 618 daily hits

  • As a citizen of British Columbia, I feel like this article, as a Start-class article, has many expansion opportunities, and is in need of additional citations. In the infobox, the aerial image of the airport dates back to 2009, and since then, the airport has changed with some expansions, part of a "YVR 2037 Master Plan." I'm aiming to get this article to FA-class. Don't get me wrong, this article is relatively long, but I feel like this Start-class article could use some improvement. 2600 etc (talk) 01:14, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 00:22, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine

[edit]

Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 13 daily hits

Comment: There is no spelling issue here. The "inconsistent British and American spellings" are simply the accepted spellings in Canadian English, which the article is written in since it is a hospital in Canada. — Kawnhr (talk) 18:37, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I know you’re talking about paed and ize. 2600 etc (talk) 19:13, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose, the issue may be fixed, not a lot of hits. SVcode(Talk) 00:23, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Head-on collision

[edit]

Head-on collision – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 66 daily hits

Geography

[edit]

Twin cities

[edit]

Twin cities – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 245 daily hits

  1. Support, needs copyright and more citaitons. SVcode(Talk) 00:24, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hulhumalé

[edit]

Hulhumalé – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 85 daily hits

  1. Support, high importance on a wikiproject and needs more expansion and citations. SVcode(Talk) 23:53, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - needs project help.--BabbaQ (talk) 08:07, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose - I don't see it being that important to the big image. It is definetly not of interest to the general public, after all. To compensate, above is listed the capital of the Maldives, Malé. The capital is much more deserving than this non-vital city Earth605 (talk) 10:03, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support, just a weak one, but a major project with a high importance rating in a country WikiProject seems really big. There are many unsourced parts and is not updated. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 08:53, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  5. OpposeGeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:47, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tobler's first law of geography

[edit]

Tobler's first law of geography – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 65 daily hits

  • Tobler's first law of geography is a widely cited and important aspect of the discipline. It is one of the foundations of spatial analysis and one of the primary results of the 21st century "Quantitative revolution". The article is listed as a "start" class and can be tremendously improved. There is a significant amount of peer-reviewed literature related to the topic.GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 22:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:00, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose, not notable. SVcode(Talk) 21:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose, not notable, not viewed frequently and I find it concerning that a Reddit post is a top option while searching the term up. 48JCL 16:44, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Try searching for it on Google Scholar. Note the titles of the articles, and citation counts. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 07:01, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Please note that won't be recognised by the bot, only write support or oppose. Yeshivish613 (talk) 21:14, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose Per 46JCL and SVcode. Earth605 (talk) 10:49, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History and politics

[edit]

2023 French Senate election

[edit]

2023 French Senate election – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 48 daily hits

  1. Support, this really needs expansion. Only 500 or so words for a big topic. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 08:57, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:00, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:50, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose, not a lot of hits. SVcode(Talk) 23:04, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Manuel Pinto da Costa

[edit]

Manuel Pinto da Costa – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 33 daily hits

  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 19:08, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:00, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:50, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edmund Ho

[edit]

Edmund Ho – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 53 daily hits

  1. Support, vital article that needs citations and expansion. SVcode(Talk) 22:25, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:01, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:50, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Terror (politics)

[edit]

Terror (politics) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 21 daily hits

  1. Oppose - controversial topic. Stockhausenfan (talk) 12:41, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:51, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - per nom.GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:50, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aviation accidents and incidents

[edit]

Aviation accidents and incidents – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1365 daily hits

  1. Support - per nom.GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:50, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 07:45, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Armoured personnel carrier

[edit]

Armoured personnel carrier – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 621 daily hits

  1. Support - per nom. Needs project help.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:00, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:50, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Language and literature

[edit]

The Road Not Taken

[edit]

The Road Not Taken – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1079 daily hits

  • This is arguably one of Frost's most famous poems if not of all poetry, at least in the United States, and therefore I feel like the article needs to be improved. The article has some issues currently—it is fairly short, has analysis and popular culture sections that need expanding. I feel like the article should not lean so heavily into the one interpretation of the poem as ironic, as it seems to do in the reception section; while it may be more "correct," at least by how Frost wrote it, but the popular interpretation of the poem is valid in its own right. Honestly, I feel like a lot of the content relating to how the text is misunderstood should be under the analysis section instead. FieryRaven (talk) 16:02, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - needs projects help. Improvements could be done, indeed.BabbaQ (talk) 00:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, needs more expansion. SVcode(Talk) 00:14, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose, those are minor issues and you also want the article to be focused. Not like 50% In Popular culture. 48JCL 23:28, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose, not convinced it is vital enough to focus on over something else. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:37, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose - I think the topic is important, but the article (though could use improvement) is not in horrible shape. GoldRomean (talk) 18:10, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Linguistic description

[edit]

Linguistic description – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 69 daily hits

  1. Support per nom. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 05:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:58, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematics and computer science

[edit]

One-form (differential geometry)

[edit]

One-form (differential geometry) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 38 daily hits

  • This article is prone to be confused with the article about One-forms of linear algebra and could use a general overhaul. Mr._Eisenstein (talk) 20:23, 15 July 2025
  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 07:41, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose, article doesn't have high enough hits, vital article nor is notable. There are lots of math articles on Wikipedia. SVcode(Talk) 00:36, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Natural sciences

[edit]

Tenrec

[edit]

Tenrec – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 467 daily hits

  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 22:49, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose Only problems being three "citation needed". Doesn't need project help. Earth605 (talk) 12:40, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 07:41, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost forest

[edit]

Ghost forest – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 48 daily hits

  • This article may be confusing to readers and could be expanded upon in terms of historical occurrences, causes, dating methods, how the info about these sites is utilized in different branches of science, and so on. A supplement list of ghost forest sites would be helpful to possibly relate them to the earthquakes/tsunamis/other sources that contributed to their formation. AHIOH [T]/[C] 07:14, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 22:34, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose Ghost forests aren't notable enough for AFI for a mile. Only 48 hits for an article that is not vital and doesn't carry much weight is unacceptable for me. Earth605 (talk) 12:44, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose per above. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:40, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support - per nom.BabbaQ (talk) 07:11, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sRGB

[edit]

SRGB – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 498 daily hits

  • This article is now considered vital at level 5, and has been the most frequently used (though many visible colours are not included, even some that can be reproduced in the CMYK printing) RGB colour space, however it is now of Start-class, meaning that Wikipedians that are expert in color science should improve it a.s.a.p.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC) added some words 07:09, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, Important article in need of expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - review, The project could really improve this article.BabbaQ (talk) 22:50, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose for the mass nomination of 5 color spaces (1/4), when the list of accepted AFI nominations contains more than plenty color/graphics topics already queued, (like 10+ or so), including another color space which has already passed. The topic area does not appear to be in critical need of this much AFI weight. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support per nom. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:40, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adobe RGB color space

[edit]

Adobe RGB color space – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 86 daily hits

  1. Support, Vital article in need of expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose for the mass nomination of 5 color spaces (2/4), when the list of accepted AFI nominations contains more than plenty color/graphics topics already queued, (like 10+ or so), including another color space which has already passed. The topic area does not appear to be in critical need of this much AFI weight. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - needs projects help.BabbaQ (talk) 00:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Adobe RGB is an important standard used by digial artists, movie studios, computer monitor manufacturers and calibration tools. TagKnife (talk) 11:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose per Utopes. EF5 16:35, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wide-gamut RGB color space

[edit]

Wide-gamut RGB color space – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 38 daily hits

  1. Support, Short article in need of major expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose for the mass nomination of 5 color spaces (3/4), when the list of accepted AFI nominations contains more than plenty color/graphics topics already queued, (like 10+ or so), including another color space which has already passed. The topic area does not appear to be in critical need of this much AFI weight. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - article needs a lot of work.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:12, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

scRGB

[edit]

ScRGB – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 24 daily hits

  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 23:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose for the mass nomination of 5 color spaces (4/4), when the list of accepted AFI nominations contains more than plenty color/graphics topics already queued, (like 10+ or so), including another color space which has already passed. The topic area does not appear to be in critical need of this much AFI weight. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stampede

[edit]

Stampede – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 207 daily hits

  1. Support per nom. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:40, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 08:40, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Flash flood warning

[edit]

Flash flood warning – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 25 daily hits

  1. Support per SVcode's concerns about expanding the article. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:47, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose The article hasn't enough hits, at least for me. Also, it is not that important. I would support Flash floods at AFI, though Earth605 (talk) 13:01, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - article needs the projects help.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:02, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support per nom. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:40, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 19–20, 2025 nor'easter

[edit]

January 19–20, 2025 nor'easter – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 13 daily hits

  1. Oppose. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:40, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose, not a lot of hits, vital article nor importance in wikiproject. SVcode(Talk) 00:16, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 07:45, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

People/Companies and organisations/Products

[edit]

Robert B. Salter

[edit]

Robert B. Salter – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 5 daily hits

  1. Oppose, this article is not notable enough for AFI. SVcode(Talk) 00:25, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Red Bull Simply Cola

[edit]

Red Bull Simply Cola – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 70 daily hits

  1. Support - Per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:02, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adidas Al Rihla

[edit]

Adidas Al Rihla – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 72 daily hits

  1. Support - for project.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:34, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tuva Novotny

[edit]

Tuva Novotny – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 2877 daily hits

  1. Support, has high hits. SVcode(Talk) 22:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose not relevant enough for an AFI slot. Was nominated for deletion a couple years back as possibly not even notable with barely enough sources, which does not look good for the prospects of what AFI would be able to do across a week. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 07:44, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Philosophy and religion

[edit]

Society and social sciences

[edit]

Air pollution in Nigeria

[edit]

Air pollution in Nigeria – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 19 daily hits

Japanese conjugation

[edit]

Japanese conjugation – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 340 daily hits

While not vital, this is the longest article by bytes in all of the English Wikipedia. I think it is to much for one person to handle. I've tried to improve it, but with no knowledge of Japanese, I can't help. Needs project help. It is High-importance to WP:JAPAN. Big task. Earth605 (talk) 07:12, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:43, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose, AFI can't do that much help. WP:JAPAN is better suited to help in this. SVcode(Talk) 00:38, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:01, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dismissal (employment)

[edit]

Dismissal (employment) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 128 daily hits

  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:21, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:43, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wake (ceremony)

[edit]

Wake (ceremony) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 500 daily hits

  1. Support GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:43, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 08:39, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Border Control

[edit]

Border Control – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 203 daily hits

  1. Support GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:43, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 07:45, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Illegal logging

[edit]

Illegal logging – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 107 daily hits

  1. Support - per nom. Article needs our help.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:35, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:43, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stretcher bearer

[edit]

Stretcher bearer – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 17 daily hits

Mass Arrest

[edit]

Mass arrest – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 19 daily hits

Sport

[edit]

German Athletics Association

[edit]

German Athletics Association – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 5 daily hits

  1. Oppose, not important enough for AFI. GoldRomean (talk) 01:12, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose, per above. SVcode(Talk) 21:36, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:16, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:44, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Three-peat

[edit]

Three-peat – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 201 daily hits

  1. Oppose This article seems to have more than enough information for what it is ( a trademarked word used occasionally in sports), and adding more would only bloat the article. All it needs is splitting the large "Trademark" section and adding a few more references to it. For the rest of the article, references are provided, and it only really needs inline citations. Altogether, it doesn't seem like the article needs a lot of work from where it is at. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Somepinkdude (talk • contribs) 01:33, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 19:44, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 07:10, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_improvement/Nominations&oldid=1327977245"