Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025 August 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:26, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, and ambiguous with {{R from scientific name}} and {{R from species to genus}} Plantdrew (talk) 18:06, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: This was originally a redirect to Template:R from scientific name. element 17:00, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:29, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navigation template as the articles it was used on were redirected, leaving this without enough links to be useful. Gonnym (talk) 13:39, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:29, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navigation template with one entry. Not enough for navigation. Gonnym (talk) 13:38, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:36, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as 2025 ASEAN Women's Championship#Group stage uses the tables directly. Gonnym (talk) 13:37, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I template-replaced it today. Tống Thành Hưng (talk) 00:51, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Why? it worked before without needing the template. Gonnym (talk) 13:56, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:28, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sports table. Gonnym (talk) 13:35, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:28, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sports table for something that will take place in 2 years. Not only is there never a need to create something like this, this far in advance, it's also not the way we do this anymore, see 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup#Group stage, which does not use templates. Gonnym (talk) 13:34, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused after edits like [1] subst the list directly. Gonnym (talk) 13:14, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2025 August 16. Izno (talk) 01:47, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2025 August 18. Primefac (talk) 00:34, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2025 August 18. Primefac (talk) 00:34, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:36, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused route template. Gonnym (talk) 11:59, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:27, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as M-157 (Michigan highway) was redirected. Gonnym (talk) 11:55, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:26, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as Georgia State Route 243 was redirected. Gonnym (talk) 11:55, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Now in use. plicit 14:26, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused route template. Gonnym (talk) 11:53, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unlinked for less than 8 hours and already up for deletion?!? WITHDRAW NOMINATION because has been restored to article. Useddenim (talk) 14:44, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
use MORE BOLD PLEASE Gonnym (talk) 16:49, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
THIS IS NOT BOLD ENOUGH FaviFake (talk) 16:50, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2025 August 10. plicit 14:26, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:25, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused graph json template. If this is a hidden use, please post where exactly this is in use. Gonnym (talk) 11:53, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:25, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused graph json template. If this is a hidden use, please post where exactly this is in use. Gonnym (talk) 11:53, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Shyamal (talk) 12:51, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:25, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused graph json template. If this is a hidden use, please post where exactly this is in use. Gonnym (talk) 11:53, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is (supposed to be) used by Template:Swiss referendum map, itself used on several articles (e.g. 2022 Swiss referendums#Results). It appears unused due to the Graph:Map extension template currently redirecting to a message saying it's broken. I'll update the Swiss referendum map template to use the new Graph extension once it supports maps. Julio974 (Talk-Contribs) 12:21, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
According to MW:Extension:Chart/Project, development is done. So if it doesn't support what you need, more than likely it isn't going to be added in the near future. Gonnym (talk) 12:50, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. plicit 14:24, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused software release template. Gonnym (talk) 11:49, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was due to someone making a change that accidentally ignored it. The template is now in use.  🐱💬 11:55, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Withdrawn. Gonnym (talk) 12:00, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:24, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused software release template. Gonnym (talk) 11:49, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:23, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This should never be used on any article. While I feel for other language wikis and their editors, spamming this on en.wiki articles shouldn't be how it is done. Gonnym (talk) 11:48, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with deletion, there are other ways to attract editors, and this would add more clutter to articles. GanzKnusper (talk) 08:21, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as we don't usually tag articles here for issues that do not concern the article directly, and the fact that it doesn't exist on other languages isn't enwiki's problem. OutsideNormality (talk) 20:46, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Tagging an article because it doesn't exist on another Wiki is not the correct way to help other Wikis grow in size. Besides, this banner doesn't even categorize the article into any sort of maintenance category. There are a few transclusions that would need to be addressed, but that is simple enough to do manually. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 21:17, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2025 August 10. plicit 14:24, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:21, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused route template. Gonnym (talk) 11:43, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:21, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused route template. Gonnym (talk) 11:43, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:35, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above are all unused recently created templates that create a colored abbreviation link for a tier company. Even if these were in use, I'd argue that these should be deleted and a plain full link should be used instead as the usage of this style fails a number of MoS guidelines, specifically

  • MOS:COLOR:
    • Links should be clearly recognizable to readers as clickable
    • The visual presentation of text and images of text should meet a sufficient contrast ratio
  • MOS:ABBR: Avoid making up new abbreviations, especially acronyms
  • MOS:JARGON: Minimize the use of jargon

Hiding links behind colored text makes the links unrecognizable and in most cases, the text fails the color contrast requirement. The abbreviation is not only unnecessary but also seems to fail the guideline. Looking at the tier articles, some of those articles don't even use an abbreviation once.

I'm also against merging these into any meta template (which should also be deleted, but that should be a different TfD).

See previous deletion disscussions here and here. Gonnym (talk) 11:36, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:15, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Only three blue links, two of which are redirects. Based on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mountain passes in Turkey, these articles will probably not be created. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 05:36, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom FaviFake (talk) 12:57, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.