Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 11

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 11

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 11, 2025.

Casino capitalism

[edit]

The term "casino capitalism" is not used anywhere in the "Economic ideology" article anymore and the section it used to link to no longer exists. ApexParagon (talk) 22:54, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Susan Strange as an avoided double redirect to Casino Capitalism. ~2025-31416-56 (talk) 17:54, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
retarget as per ~2025-31416-56 Oreocooke (talk) 21:36, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lithuania men's national Under-20 and Under-21 basketball team

[edit]

Delete all. This is ambiguous. There is also a separate article on Wikipedia about the U21 team: Lithuania men's national under-21 basketball team.
Maiō T. (talk) 20:14, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above 77qq 💬 contributions 21:22, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ambiguous and WP:XorY violation. ~2025-31416-56 (talk) 17:55, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
delete per XY per above Oreocooke (talk) 21:38, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hydrocortisone brand names II

[edit]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Delete (slight strong preference) or retarget to Hydrocortisone. Hydrocortisone and cortisol are two names for the same molecule. 'Hydrocortisone' is the name used for the pharmaceutical product while cortisol is the name used for the endogenous hormone. These are valid {{R from trade name}}'s but these are fairly obscure drug trade names. These were mass created by User:PotatoBot presumably from a comprehensive list of brand names. Consensus has been mixed as to whether we should keep obscure trade (brand) names for drugs and other chemicals. See ongoing discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 2#Umbrium and the two discussions linked in the Old RfD list template. Do not keep since 'cortisol' is not the proper name for the pharmaceutical. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 00:18, 3 December 2025 (UTC) Edit: Updated listing rationale to reflect my current 'strong' preference for deletion (no longer 'slight'). 01:14, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all per nom. I would imagine all are listed on PubMed as "user supplied synonyms" for hydrocortisone, but without mention at target, it's not very helpful to have redirects from these obscure trade names, and these are too many to mention at target. I have good faith that the nom has vetted the list of tradenames and nominated the obscure ones that are not clearly associated with cortisol/hydrocortisone. Concur that if kept, these should be retargeted to hydrocortisone as a more appropriate target. Mdewman6 (talk) 07:49, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget all to hydrocortisone per nom and the outcome of the first RfD, although I think there could have been consensus to delete if more people had participated in that discussion. No objection to deletion except for consistency's sake. I2Overcome talk 22:55, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @I2Overcome there are many more of these and we can establish a new consensus to delete these redirects now… 🙃 —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 23:50, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete? Or retarget to Hydrocortisone?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 19:57, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mothra Leo

[edit]

Delete. Every mention of this name was removed by an anon in 2024; that edit was reverted by another anon, but then reinstated by Waxworker ([2] and [3]). – Fayenatic London 17:42, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valdora (currency)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Speedy deleted by WereSpielChequers per (WP:G7) (non-admin closure) Casablanca 🪨(T) 21:22, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While Valora (currency)Valora (currency) is the currency of Molossia, I can find nothing on the "Valdora" so this sould likely be deleted. Casablanca 🪨(T) 17:31, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry, I didnt even know that the Valora redirect existed (sorry) shane (talk to me if you want!) 18:38, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete i made in error shane (talk to me if you want!) 18:38, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

La Vacca Saturno Saturnita

[edit]

Brainrot character not mentioned in article. I suggest deleting it — Preceding unsigned comment added by CyborgsWM (talk • contribs) 16:33, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom Oreocooke (talk) 16:42, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom 77qq 💬 contributions 21:20, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, not mentioned at target. To my knowledge, this is a legitimate Italian brainrot character, but I'm probably too old to know mostly anything about Italian brainrot. ~2025-31416-56 (talk) 17:58, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Death factory

[edit]

"Death factory" is an uncommon at best term for the Nazi extermination camps. It is not mentioned on page, and is more of a generic colloquialism for all sorts of unpleasant historic things, including literally deadly factories, proverbial factories of death, including Japanese biological warfare factories, and the capital punishment system in South Africa, among others. Beyond this, it's an extremely plausible typo for "Death Factory", which is the disambiguation page for two films. There's no clear primacy of the term here to mean Nazi extermination camps. As the page notes, it's a colloquialism for that, but it's a colloquialism for many things. Iskandar323 (talk) 14:20, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Ambiguous euphemism. ~2025-31416-56 (talk) 17:58, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gustoff Climt

[edit]

This is an implausible typo of Gustav Klimt, I seriously doubt anyone is mistakenly spelling his name this way. Golem08 (talk) 14:08, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete implausible 77qq 💬 contributions 21:21, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Phonetic misspelling. I could see someone genuinely making this mistake. However, pageview count is low. ~2025-31416-56 (talk) 18:00, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

dracula vlad ţepeş

[edit]

implausible order, and the results seem purely coincidental or procedural (thus, stuff like "dracula/vlad ţepeş" or "dracula (vlad ţepeş)"). i guess it's also vague with other depictions of vlad the impaler, and maybe the man himself depending on who you ask

also, there's an orchid species known as "dracula vlad-tepes", which is really funny, but it has no english article yet :( consarn (talck) (contirbuton s) 13:22, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

retarget to vlad the impaler or disambiguate Oreocooke (talk) 16:50, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
no, that would first require some context in which a last-first-middle name be plausible outside of a single orchid with a flower that looks like an unwashed asshole... and i guess that there be other draculae (draculi? dracula?) known by this full name, as a two entry dab isn't worth more than, say, a hatnote
wait, does this specific name even apply to the vlad who enjoyed impaling people or the vlad who was a pimp? because it seems "dracula" and "ţepeş" are mutually exclusive outside of castlevania and touhou consarn (talck) (contirbuton s) 18:43, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jacknjellify

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Huang brothers. Let it snow as {{r alternative name (non-admin closure) Thepharoah17 (talk) 20:05, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Previous AfDs for this article:

Operators of the channel finally have their own article, change to redirect to Huang brothers. - ExcitedA. It may be a good idea to look at this. 13:17, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

retarget to huang brothers per above Oreocooke (talk) 16:51, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Huang brothers 77qq 💬 contributions 21:20, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Huang brothers per nom. More specific target. ~2025-31416-56 (talk) 18:01, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Yongin FC

[edit]

Delete the target Yongin FC article redirect, it is unused and wrongly redirected to Yongin Football Center, and now the new professional club Yongin FC was just founded and the article cannot be created because of this old and wrong redirect. Snowflake91 (talk) 09:33, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

another article can still be plopped on top of this title, so there's no issue in that area consarn (talck) (contirbuton s) 13:56, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
comment: yeah I'm not entirely sure how to handle this Oreocooke (talk) 16:52, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, a new article can be written at Yongin FC without need to delete this. But if there is no plan to write such an article soon and the current redirect is incorrect or likely to mislead then it should be deleted. So, I guess, delete unless a new article is written before this closes. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 02:47, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now. The other article should be written as a draft, and it can probably be moved to mainspace at some point. ~2025-31416-56 (talk) 18:02, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Romance peoples

[edit]

Proposing a redirect to Latins#Latin peoples and regions. Much more of an exact match, contentwise. A user who searches up "Romance peoples" more than likely is seeking information on the "peoples"/demographic terminology aspect rather than about the languages themselves. Evaporation123 (talk) 07:50, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

you're supposed to put what it currently redirects to, not what you want it to redirect to. Oreocooke (talk) 16:53, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ftfy (also retarget to Latins#Latin peoples and regions per nom)

Billy The Kid Museum

[edit]

There's another Billy the Kid Museum in New Mexico, and it appears to be at least as if not more prominent in search results. The target article doesn't mention the museum directly, so the redirect isn't very helpful for readers looking for the Texas museum and is just confusing for readers looking for the New Mexico museum. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 04:03, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ISO 639:simple

[edit]

Am I right that this is not an ISO code? If so, proposing deletion Too old for R3, but its use in WMF environment makes me hesitate on G3. Happy Editing -- IAmChaos 02:54, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

comment: I understand R3, but please enlighten me on how this could be vandalist. Oreocooke (talk) 16:57, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Oreocooke: Probably as a blatant hoax rather than vandalism. ~2025-31416-56 (talk) 18:05, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
k Oreocooke (talk) 18:41, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the TA is exactly right about my thoughts. Happy Editing -- IAmChaos 17:18, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1Sa.

[edit]

Seems implausible, unnatural as search term, and if anything, a web search of it turns up other targets. Currently only other redirects and some obscure hatnotes direct here. Iskandar323 (talk) 08:49, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: My guess here is that the redirect is intended to be a {{R avoided double redirect}} for 1 Samuel1 Samuel. We also have redirects "2Sa.", "2 Samuel2 Samuel" and "2nd Samuel2nd Samuel", but no "1st Samuel". (I currently have no opinion on the nominated redirect.) Steel1943 (talk) 16:52, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Created 1st Samuel1st Samuel. Happy Editing -- IAmChaos 02:57, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 09:21, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: 2Sa. bundled in; there don't appear to be additional similar ones. Delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:59, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
yeah sure delete per above Oreocooke (talk) 19:05, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leftover Xiaolin Showdown redirects

[edit]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Delete these leftover redirects. Thepharoah17 (talk) 05:07, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the history of Minor Xiaolin Showdown characters?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:10, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Explicit:: that one's fine. the others aren't however Oreocooke (talk) 04:34, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What did you mean by that one's "fine"? And what does it mean by others "aren't"? Jay 💬 18:15, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Oreocooke: Could you clarify your position considering Jay's question? —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:03, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist — let's ideally solidify a consensus on the page history.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:01, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jay and TechnoSquirrel69: clarification being that the specific character links are much less plausible than the minor ____ characters link, which is arguably much more plausible Oreocooke (talk) 16:59, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Progressive Conservative Party of Prince Edward Island leadership election

[edit]

Article was created at this title back in March, after the province's premier suddenly resigned and reliable sources (such as they are in Canada's east) expected a leadership election to happen quickly. It was announced today that the election will be held in February 2026, so the page was moved. Listing on behalf of User:GoodDay who asked about PRODding the redirect at WT:CANADA and also tagged the redirect for WP:R3 deletion. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 00:29, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - implausible search target
―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (hihi) 13:42, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

President of Belgium

[edit]

Recently created and the position doesn’t exist, but similar redirects have proven controversial. I contested an R3 speedy deletion to bring this here for the community to decide what to do with it. I believe it should just be deleted as unnecessary and potentially misleading, along with Prime Minister of the United States and President of the United Kingdom (both separate, open discussions). I2Overcome talk 00:28, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, doesn't exist and never existed. Fram (talk) 08:31, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
delete per above. president of the United kingdom 2 Oreocooke (talk) 16:43, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Prime Minister of Belgium. Reasonable misnomer, especially for people who live in a country that has no Prime Minister. ~2025-31416-56 (talk) 18:08, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Everybody dance now... dance... dance... d-d-d-dance now!

[edit]

extremely unlikely. Oreocooke (talk) 00:09, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(supplementary note: I would've just r3'd it for being as implausible as it is, had it not been on enwiki longer than almost everyone currently here) Oreocooke (talk) 16:41, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(that being 19:33, 30 January 2009 (UTC)) Oreocooke (talk) 16:37, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
alas, there actually is an accident here, as the formatting causes the systems to mistake the date for part of your signature. why you'd be signing this impoperly in the first place is beyond me, though consarn (talck) (contirbuton s) 19:48, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
i'm actually using that to my advantage so it counts as a full signature Oreocooke (talk) 21:21, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(after all, why else would i have put it in the exact format as a ~~~~~, including the (UTC) at the end? Oreocooke (talk) 21:41, 11 December 2025 (UTC))[reply]
yeah, the problem is that that falsely passes a comment off as having been made at that time. which is, as gandhi would describe it, "a total cowabummer, duderino" consarn (talck) (contirbuton s) 11:57, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
if it bothers you so much I can correct the time. Oreocooke (talk) 18:48, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
corrected Oreocooke (talk) 18:50, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2025_December_11&oldid=1327894387"