Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 15

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 15

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 15, 2025.

Fade to Black (Kendrick Lamar song)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. If you want to bundle several pages for nomination at once, please follow the instructions at WP:RFDHOWTO. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:26, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fade to Black (Kendrick Lamar song), Fighter Thief in the Night, Fell for You (song), Erika Kane (Kendrick Lamar song), End of the Line (Kendrick Lamar song), Driving Down the Darkness, Director (song), Comfortable (Kendrick Lamar song), Believe (Kendrick Lamar song), Before the Hangman's Noose, and Of Paupers and Poets are all song titles that were registered under Lamar prior to Mr. Morale & the Big Steppers but never actually released.[1]

Fighter Thief in the Night could be retargeted to From a Distance: The Event. Fell for You (song) could be DABified with ¡Uno!, Shubh, and The Dramatics. Driving Down the Darkness and Before the Hangman's Noose could be retargeted to The Fury of Our Maker's Hand. Of Paupers and Poets could be retargeted to White Lightning (band). मल्ल (talk) 23:01, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

K Dot Mr Moral

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 06:35, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

K Dot and Mr. Morale are nicknames for Lamar, but they aren't ever used in tandem. Pretty implausible search term. मल्ल (talk) 22:43, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

TOC (album)

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 23#TOC (album)

Purple Hibiscus (Kendrick Lamar song)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. If you want to bundle several pages for nomination at once, please follow the instructions at WP:RFDHOWTO. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:27, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Purple Hibiscus" originates from a fake track list for Damn.[2] It's not a real song is not currently mentioned in either article. मल्ल (talk) 21:58, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Purple Hibiscus (song), Trust Everyone, Counterfeit (Kendrick Lamar song), None of Your Business (Kendrick Lamar song), Richard Nixon (Kendrick Lamar song), Product (Kendrick Lamar song), Double Standards (song), Double Standards (Kendrick Lamar song), Commercialized, Failed Experiments, If You Had Me, You Lost Me (Interlude), If You Had Me, You Lost Me, Swim with the Fishes (God Said), Rest in Paradise (Interlude), Rest in Paradise, Paranoia, Is Love Stronger Than Death?, Ten Steps (Kendrick Lamar song), Ten Steps (song), and Ten Steps also originate from the fake track listing. मल्ल (talk) 22:06, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ten Steps (song) can be retargeted to The Chase (Marit Larsen album). Double Standards (song) could be DABified, On Purpose, with Purpose, Life of a Don, The Smartest, and Control System are all plausible targets. मल्ल (talk) 22:18, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Creative Commons Attribution CC BY

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:27, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect (the name is repeated first in long form and then in abbreviated form) {{Lemondoge|Talk|Contributions}} 20:41, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

COCKAYNE SOUP

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Cockayne Soup. Complex/Rational 20:33, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to refer to the EP Cockayne Soup, but I'm not seeing anything that indicates that the title of that EP is specifically referred to in allcaps. Refarget or delete?. 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:2175:3C0B:2197:6BE1 (talk) 20:29, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

CB-series chastity cages

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 23#CB-series chastity cages

Chalcedonian Church of Constantinople

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 23#Chalcedonian Church of Constantinople

Dev (mythology)

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 23#Dev (mythology)

Voiced bidental fricative

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 21:09, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target anymore; used to be mentioned there when User:BodhiHarp made an undiscussed move that has now been reverted. Is a non-notable subject so it shouldn't be made into a separate article (found in no languages and no sources say it is common in disordered speech) – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 17:57, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What about redirecting to Bidental consonant instead. BodhiHarp (talk) 18:39, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have retargeted this to Bidental consonant. Consider this request withdrawn – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 21:07, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

WikiWikiWebby

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 20:33, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect. Not mentioned at target. No search results for this name. Johnj1995 (talk) 16:01, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Flight Lieutenant Towkir Islam

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 22#Flight Lieutenant Towkir Islam

Southcentral Europe

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Regions of Europe. (non-admin closure) feminist🩸 (talk) 14:41, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Regions of Europe per precedent at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 31#South-West Europe. My initial thought was to retarget to Italy (geographical region), but the Balkans are also sometimes referred to as part of “south-central Europe.” Hassan697 (talk) 14:34, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Niceness

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:29, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Niceness is not unanimously considered to be a synonym of kindness as the sources and the article itself does not correlate the two nor does the kindness article even mention the word "nice". That, and the word niceness is also associated pleasure, as mentioned in the hatnote. I instead propose turning this redirect into a disambiguation page that lists kindness and pleasure. Though other options could be discussed. Cacophonic peace (talk) 14:29, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tsunami vs hurricane

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:35, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confused redirect, why we need to compare tsunami and hurricane? A1Cafel (talk) 13:25, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Restore the original without prejudice to AfD. That looked more like an essay than a Wikipedia article, but it doesn't meet any speedy deletion criteria and so should be discussed as an article. Thryduulf (talk) 15:30, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, agreeing with Bkonrad who called the content "useless". Natural disaster is probably the closest target available because it covers both tsunamis and hurricanes, but there isn't a comparison between them. I don't think there should be one anyway, they're vastly different phenomena. -- Tavix (talk) 15:34, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per above. drinks or coffee or prime *GET OUT* 15:59, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Tavix and edit summary by Bkonrad. I see no value in restoring the 2011 version and then going through an AfD. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 22:55, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore and send to AfD The specific topic may not be notable, but comparing various kinds of natural disasters appears to be, and if there is really no content about that, then there probably should be,[3][4][5] so discussion at AfD appears appropriate. Paradoctor (talk) 13:39, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    oh my black goat of the woods with a thousand young you actually did some checking. i mean, i still disagree with the sources, but it's a big step forward. here are my notes on the sources themselves
    • the first one is a top whatever many list. not really usable for comparing them beyond which one has the biggest numbers (in this case, which one is more dangerous). tsunamis are #6, tornadoes are #7, and the word "hurricane" isn't mentioned in the article at all
    • the second one is just about natural disasters in general, and doesn't bother to compare them either
    • either i'm walled out by something, or the third one is just kinda nothing
    i'll also disagree with restoring here, in that you're not voting to restore an article to then add potentially usable stuff to it (regardless of how much i think it's not usable), but to restore an essay in a faulty title which you then want to see an article created on top of... so why not just create one from scratch at a better title? consarn (grave) (obituary) 20:47, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    and the word "hurricane" isn't mentioned in the article at all That'd be because it's under the heading "Cyclones"-- a hurricane, a cyclone, and a typhoon are the same type of storm, only differentiated by geographical location (although 'tropical storm/tropical cyclone' is the generic term for all three).
    ...That's it, that's all I wanted to pop in to point out :3 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 21:12, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The sources were the first three hits on my first query. There is a ton more. The point being that comparing disaster classes is, prima facie, widespread, and it is a subject of academic research.
    One motivation for sending stuff to AfD is motivating a wider audience to find existing content or to create it, which would then serve as target. If not, c'est la vie, but at least we tried. Paradoctor (talk) 22:46, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Fair enough, but consarn's final point still holds merit-- this feels like something that should be done from scratch, and either started yourself or, if you really want to get others' help for it, you could take the concept to WP:AfC. Gonna finally throw my hat in the ring here-- and say that this, the redirect as it stands, merits deletion. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 23:34, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    honestly, i'm just gonna deny the "wider audience" argument from here on out. not long ago, an article that went through this exact kind of discussion was restored despite being unambiguously not good, i nommed it on afd as should've been done straight after restoration, it got one vote after two relists, and was still only soft deleted as a prod. more participation is not guaranteed, and banking on the chance has the necessary drawback of restoring content that, in this case, blatantly violates wp:n and wp:not for at least a week (provided wp:snow or a csd don't end up applying)
    and honestly, that case is pretty comparable to this one, since sources have been found and can be shown here, as were found then, shown then, and evaluated then (if admittedly by someone who has no idea what he's talking about when it comes to south korean video editing software). if you found "a ton more", i'd like to see it, so that it may be used as material for a draft or a new article without taking this headache to another venue for what amounts to no reason consarn (grave) (obituary) 00:16, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete. it was an essay. an unsourced essay. an unsourced essay written in an entirely informal tone, suggesting that it was someone's homework. it's also a case of wp:xy, as tsunamis are angry water and hurricanes are angry wind. they can be together, and usually are, but they're different things, and comparisons between them really aren't in our scope without sigcov consarn (grave) (obituary) 20:39, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    and usually are I'd say no? Tsunamis are usually the result of undersea earthquakes, while hurricanes are instead caused by... well, we have an entire article on that, but suffice to say earthquakes aren't involved. That said, I suppose it's not out of the question that a hurricane could cause a tsunami... but I'm no meteorologist, so.
    Of course, that just serves to underscore your main point that they're vastly different things. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 21:21, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    d*ng i got owned by facts and logic. blame tcrf for catching my interest first consarn (grave) (obituary) 23:54, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Eco-TIRAS International Association of River Keeper

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:14, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Simply not the organization's name. It misses a word from its name. Looking up this exact name on Google I only get results from Wikipedia and also this [6]. Super Ψ Dro 12:17, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dirty Pipe

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:14, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dirty Pipe (CVE-2022-0847) is a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the Linux kernel, no reference on the target page Stumbling9655 (talk) 12:15, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

HermitCraft

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:36, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No longer mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:54, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:49, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

///

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:13, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

the adidas three stripes as seen in their logo aren't forward slashes (/) but back slashes (\).

also, "///" is a much better way to instead textually represent the blush stickers / luminescent blush on anime characters... which is currently something we don't cover to my knowledge. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 08:09, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per ip 135 - Ascii art of a corporate logo isn't really a strong basis for a redirect, and it's ambiguous enough for it to to be astonishing. I think the disambiguation content suggested here is too nebulous to create a proper dab page, but I don't oppose anyone taking a stab at it if one was created. BugGhost 🦗👻 01:01, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or disambiguate?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:45, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pokémon/Bulbasaur

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:12, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These seem to be leftovers from erroneous article creations. They have no use and can be deleted. Manifestation (talk) 09:52, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:20, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both per nom. The fact that Pokémon/Kadabra both is an unlikely search term and has no edit history other than being a redirect means it should be good to delete. Steel1943 (talk) 21:10, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Pokémon/Kadabra. We don't delete redirects from 2004 without very good reasons, and mere implausibility isn't a good enough reason to trash a bit of our early history; either this dates from the WP:Subpages#History of subpages era, or it's very soon afterward. (Also, note that it was created by a pagemove, so it may predate 2004; neither Kadabra nor Kadabara goes back to February 2004, so I don't know its actual creation date.) This was not an erroneous article creation but a page title in line with contemporary standards; we wouldn't delete AustraliA or UnitedStates on implausibility grounds, since they too complied with the CamelCase page title standards required before free links were enabled. Bulbasaur is just a weird creation, since we didn't support subpages in 2021; just delete it. Nyttend (talk) 22:19, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Pagelogs for Kadabra show that it was moved to Abra evolutionary line in 2007 as part of a history merge, which may have obscured the details of the move. Jay 💬 17:20, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:44, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete both. bulbasaur is a clear-cut case, kadabra is mired in confusing jank that absolutely makes it a detriment. internal links aren't an issue, external links don't seem to be either, so we really should just cut that tumor off. i thought there would be something coherent since they don't predate that lawsuit, but i got nothing :( consarn (grave) (obituary) 12:41, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all This seems unnecessary
Theblackmidi72 (talk) 09:46, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both The first was a recent creation, so it doesn't qualify as "historical". The 2nd has no standalone page anyway, and there's no evidence of a major external link that would be broken by removing it. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:20, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

David B

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to David Beauchard with a hatnote to List of people named David#B. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:33, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous term, can also refer to David Beckham, David Berkowitz, etc. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 16:50, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget to David Beauchard or disambiguate?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:42, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rule 62

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:37, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no mentions of a "rule 62" in the target article, though there is a Rule 62 (album). 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:6311:CAC1:2EA3:44E4 (talk) 12:49, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 04:11, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the pre-BLAR content history in case of a Move? (The content was sourced, unlike what IP35 said).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 04:42, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try…
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:39, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Release of Duke Nukem Forever

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

really weak nom, sure, but would it be more plausible to retarget to the section on the game's release on its development's article? either i'm misreading things, or that one contains more info on what happened in its release, and from writing this, i think the average reader would be looking for that article consarn (grave) (obituary) 19:17, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 22:43, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:35, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

1st pyramid

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 27#1st pyramid

Arbaclofen

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 23#Arbaclofen

The Fresh Food People

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Woolworths Supermarkets#Slogan. asilvering (talk) 23:29, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Woolworths (supermarket) also uses this slogan. Should we redirect to a defunct supermarket chain that predominantly shows this slogan, or to a very-much-still-alive supermarket chain that uses it as a subtitle of sorts? User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 12:49, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 13:55, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Woollies. If this were an alternate name, I could see disambiguating or otherwise maintaining a reference to Safeway, but it's an advertising slogan in current use by one of the country's most prominent retailers, so I'm comfortable saying that most searchers will be thinking of the current chain, not the defunct one. Australia's had a vast amount of immigration in the last eight years (including me), so there's a huge number of people who frequently see Woollies and their advertisements but who never encountered a Safeway or their advertisements. Nyttend (talk) 22:06, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further thoughts on retargeting to Woolworths (supermarket)?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:32, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Woolworths Supermarkets § Slogan with a see also hatnote to Safeway (Australia) § Acquisition by Woolworths. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:44, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Organismal biology

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to History of biology. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:25, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No longer mentioned at target. Added here in 2005 and removed here in 2021. The subject is mentioned at History of biology. Cremastra (talk · contribs) 00:38, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:26, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

מאָסקװע

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:47, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating per WP:FORRED. This is the Yiddish language word for Moscow, but Moscow's name is not of Yiddish origin. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 17:11, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: There are many cities in Eastern Europe with Yiddish names such as Lviv. Thepharoah17 (talk) 17:22, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article on Lviv says "Lviv was also a major centre of Jewish culture, in particular as a centre of the Yiddish language, and was the home of the world's first Yiddish-language daily newspaper, the Lemberger Togblat, established in 1904." That shows a strong connection between Lviv and Yiddish and justifies a redirect from Lviv's Yiddish name (also mentioned in the article). Unless a similar connection is demonstrated for Moscow, this redirect should be deleted. Toadspike [Talk] 18:45, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 09:00, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:43, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No clear consensus yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:25, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Casablanca, thank you for demonstrating affinity. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 11:50, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget per Casablanca. My conditional delete does not apply anymore but I'd still prefer to redirect to the more specific article of the two. Warudo (talk) 14:07, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, unlikely to use Yiddish on the English Wikipedia to search for a Russian city. We don't have Spanish redirects for every one of the hundreds of thousands of pages about Spanish topics; the Spanish Wikipedia is the location one would expect redirects in that language. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:28, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rebecca Taibleson

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio giuliano 10:02, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zero need for this redirect. Person has just been announced by Trump as a judicial nominee. Otherwise, person is non notable unless and until confirmed. An article will be created in draft space in due course and will be moved to this location when/if the person is confirmed by the Senate. It is wholly unnecessary to create this redirect. Safiel (talk) 05:15, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

WP:POOP

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:27, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The word "poop" isn't found in the target page, and also isn't a very plausible search. Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 03:33, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Omuma people

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 22#Omuma people

Purple bananas

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 22#Purple bananas

Sudanic

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Sudanic languages. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 02:23, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This generally seems to be used in reference to Sudanic languages. 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:32, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tom Austin (baseball)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdraw. Withdrawn and speedily retargetted to Methodist Monarchs#Baseball. Casablanca 🪨(T) 16:10, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This was merged into Methodist University at a point (and was moved from Tom Austin to Tom Austin (baseball)Tom Austin (baseball) as a redirect to preserve history), but it is in no way mentioned at Methodist University right now. Without a mention, this redirect makes little sense. Casablanca 🪨(T) 01:31, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Paralysex

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:10, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find a single mention of this term in a reliable-ish source- just a couple tweets and an urban dictionary entry. Zzz plant (talk) 01:22, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Spinal cord injuries do not cause paralysis, as in most cases IIRC spinal cord injuries are relatively easy to fix with surgery (with only relatively mild in comparison pain after). IANAD though so take this with all the salt in the Dead Sea :P User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 02:42, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

NH2CH(CH2C6H4OH)COOH

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 22#NH2CH(CH2C6H4OH)COOH

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2025_August_15&oldid=1308024318"