Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 11

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 11

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 11, 2025.

American Photojournalist

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of American photojournalists. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 23:07, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Link to non-main character which is named by occupation; being titled by the character's occupation is ambiguous, and doesn't align with one who would be searching about American photojournalists. Roast (talk) 23:51, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Voirloups

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:34, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the destination article, singular Voirloup does not exist, and fr:Voirloup is a separate article from fr:Lycanthrope, contradicting the creator's edit summary. Joy (talk) 21:12, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Prince William (William Arthur Philip Louis Windsor)

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 19#Prince William (William Arthur Philip Louis Windsor)

Princess Diaa

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:34, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per #8 of WP:RFD#DELETE, I propose that this redirect to the article on the People's Princess be deleted. Simply stated, I do not find it plausible that one would misspell Diana's name as Diaa. AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 20:47, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Subaltern Elizabeth Windsor

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 20:05, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per #5 of WP:RFD#DELETE, I propose that this redirect to the article on Britain's longest-reigning queen be deleted. Simply stated, although I can accept Elizabeth Windsor by itself as a plausible search term for Elizabeth II, I fail to see what "Subaltern" has to do with her. AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 20:33, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Alexandrina Victoria von Wettin, née Hanover

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:13, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per #8 of WP:RFD#DELETE, I propose that this redirect to the article on the British queen who lent her name to the Victorian era be deleted. First, the WP:COMMONNAME of this monarch is Victoria, not Alexandrina Victoria. Second, this redirect implies that Victoria used a surname of Hanover. Although she is indeed from the House of Hanover, she would not have used a surname in practice, like other British monarchs. Third, von Wettin may imply that Victoria was German by nationality, which is not the case. Finally, Victoria, via Albert, formally married into the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, not the House of Wettin per se. AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 20:20, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bess of England

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 20:06, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per #8 of WP:RFD#DELETE, I propose that this redirect to the article on England's Virgin Queen be deleted. Although I am aware that Elizabeth I is also called Good Queen Bess, (e.g. A), I cannot recall her even being referred to as Bess without any qualifier. Also, Bess of England implies that Bess was the Virgin Queen's regnal name, which is not the case. AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 20:01, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chiweiner

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget Chiweiner; delete the rest. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:13, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

First batch of some unmentioned redirects that are not explained anywhere on the English Wikipedia nor on Wiktionary. Some have "article" history that was subsequently blanked but not merged; some used to be mentioned at Poodle crossbreedPoodle crossbreed but that is now also a redirect. See also previous discussions at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 10#Malkie or Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 10#Boodle (dog). 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:33, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as these are not useful. If mentioned at list of dog crossbreeds they could be retargetted but I'd not encourage the inclusion of entries solely to justify a redirect (there are hundreds of thousands of possible crossbreed combinations) Traumnovelle (talk) 01:50, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree that the possible invented crossbreed names are probably limitless. I/we, ages ago, worked to try to keep out articles and lists with any except (by some definition) commonly used or accepted crossbreed names. The question came up about what do we do for people who come to wikipedia looking for an answer to some names that are less solid yet still crop up fairly regularly. Poodle xbreeds are so common that it seemed to make sense (at the time) to have a page that addressed that briefly, but again that could be a very very long list.
    Most of these were added after we'd delete a new page with that title and then some entirely different person would show up eventually and add it again. An attempt to forestall ongoing repeat maintenance.
    I wonder whether we could do something like add a short section to Dog crossbreed article like, if you ended up here after entering a specific dog breed, something something something.
    And with that brilliant suggestion, ta, good luck. Elf | Talk 03:05, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • information Note: Added {{Old RfD list}} (nom did already mention these in the original listing). --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 17:42, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget Chiweiner → List of dog crossbreeds#Chiweenie and tag as {{R from alternative name}}. Delete the rest. None of the others are listed at List of dog crossbreeds and most have little or no evidence of widespread usage on Google or are not clearly the primary topic (for example, 'Sharpdale' is the name of several companies and also a location in Scotland). The limited sources I was able to quickly locate on a few of these did not clearly meet the inclusion criteria for List of dog crossbreeds. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 21:53, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do what Myceteae said. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:52, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ajit Singh (race walker)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 14:01, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajit Singh (race walker), there was consensus against an article for this person, but no consensus about whether the redirect that now exists is plausible. Consequently I'm moving the discussion to RfD to settle this. This is a procedural nomination, I'm neutral. Sandstein 18:39, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

World Cup (of Soccer)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 20:07, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Though WP:CHEAP, World Cup (of Soccer) doesn't make any sense, rarely typed, and rarely visited (only once viewed three time in a month within last two years). Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 17:50, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of mountain passes in Albania

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 20#List of mountain passes in Albania

Il-Fontana (It-Triq tal-Għajn)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:15, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Local language name of the place combined with an unnatural disambiguator of an alternate name in the local language. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 16:55, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 17:37, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

In The Air Tonight - Lyrical Analysis

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 20:07, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-useful redirects that were created way back in 2005 to delete school assignment-type "articles." Unlikely anyone will use this specific phrase in either case. Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:14, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lyrical Analysis. Also file these under WP:DAFT. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 21:12, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Brevity is the soul of wit

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Phrases from Hamlet in common English. Everyone in this thread appears to be okay with this result, even if not thrilled, which I still see as a rough consensus. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 21:22, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quote from the play, but unmentioned at the target, and although it has a few random mentions in other articles, I don't really see a good target here. Suggest deleting unless someone has a better idea. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 14:38, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tetris (Smartphone game)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Tetris variants. ✗plicit 14:15, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll love to list this for R3 speedy deletion, but since this redirect was created in 2012, however implausible, it ain't recent, so listing it here for discussion. Intrisit (talk) 13:57, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

London railway station (disambiguation)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Seems to be another consensus to move the DAB to the base name. RM can handle any future movement ventures. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 18:58, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"London railway station" (without the "(disambiguation)" ) is already a redirect. Therefore, this search term is impossible but the redirect is also not useful. JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 10:38, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: London railway station was listed at the RfD but not tagged for RfD. I just tagged it.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:12, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Worldcorp Enterprises

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:16, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have recently found a new obsession: Worldcorp Enterprises, as is mentioned here.

However, as edgy and borderline CA-ish as it can get (like "fatherhood.wma" for example), I don't think it was ever rolled in with Pizzagate, as I could find nothing from a quick search it was mentioned, but only in a section created by the redirect creator and which was reverted by CaptainEek 2 hours later. And Worldcorp is no longer mentioned in this article (now) anyhow. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 07:59, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Donald Trump's

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 19#Donald Trump's

David Bowie's

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 19#David Bowie's

Canada's

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 19#Canada's

Love slave

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 19#Love slave

Business Data Catalog

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 23#Business Data Catalog

Football at the 2026 Summer Olympics – Women's tournament

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 18#Football at the 2026 Summer Olympics – Women's tournament

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2025_August_11&oldid=1315576672"