Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/We Don't Need to Whisper/2
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result pending
"Unreferenced section" orange banner at the top of "Release history". I added a "citation needed" for a quote. Z1720 (talk) 01:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- Is...that it...? This is easily fixed, its just a couple release dates. Either source it or delete it. There's no need for a full re-assessment. Sergecross73 msg me 20:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Sergecross73: I invite any interested editors to resolve the listed concerns if they wish. Z1720 (talk) 21:39, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- Great, but this sort of minor issue is not worthy of a GAR. There's no reason to believe this is - release dates for a very mainstream modern rock album - is going to be some sort of insurmountable problem to resolve. This didn't need this sort of escalation. Sergecross73 msg me 21:42, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- When I tagged the release section, I did not mean to imply that this otherwise well-sourced article was in need of a total reassessment. Rather, it was more of a suggestion that reliable sources should be added to verify the information in the section, just like any other information that's included in an article. I felt this was especially warranted since this article is listed as a GA, but contains a section stating the release dates in certain territories, yet there isn't a single source for any of them. Magatta (talk) 13:06, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- I tried looking for the Australia date, and there's evidence that it probably was the case. Unfortunately, absolutely nothing reliable has survived. Sadly, this section wasn't sourced when the article was passed 11 years ago (when such resources probably existed), and it should have been. I didn't go further than that. mftp dan oops 14:04, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
- Y'all better not delist the article bc yall couldnt fine ONE release date source ok // Chchcheckit (talk) 13:54, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Chchcheckit: The orange banner is for five release dates, so that might require up to five sources. I invite anyone interested in fixing up the article to do so, as subject-matter specialists can usually find sources more quickly than the average editor or reader. If the orange banner remains, that could be justification for delisting as orange banners are a quick-fail criteria in GANs. Z1720 (talk) 15:45, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
- ykwim Chchcheckit (talk) 16:05, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
- Like at worst just get one source for dates and then remove the release history section. It is insignificant to the prose/content in gen // Chchcheckit (talk) 16:08, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
- Agreed. There's extensive sourcing present for the chart debut/peaks, which confirm the release regions and windows. Sergecross73 msg me 02:11, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Chchcheckit: The orange banner is for five release dates, so that might require up to five sources. I invite anyone interested in fixing up the article to do so, as subject-matter specialists can usually find sources more quickly than the average editor or reader. If the orange banner remains, that could be justification for delisting as orange banners are a quick-fail criteria in GANs. Z1720 (talk) 15:45, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
- Y'all better not delist the article bc yall couldnt fine ONE release date source ok // Chchcheckit (talk) 13:54, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
- I tried looking for the Australia date, and there's evidence that it probably was the case. Unfortunately, absolutely nothing reliable has survived. Sadly, this section wasn't sourced when the article was passed 11 years ago (when such resources probably existed), and it should have been. I didn't go further than that. mftp dan oops 14:04, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
- When I tagged the release section, I did not mean to imply that this otherwise well-sourced article was in need of a total reassessment. Rather, it was more of a suggestion that reliable sources should be added to verify the information in the section, just like any other information that's included in an article. I felt this was especially warranted since this article is listed as a GA, but contains a section stating the release dates in certain territories, yet there isn't a single source for any of them. Magatta (talk) 13:06, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- Great, but this sort of minor issue is not worthy of a GAR. There's no reason to believe this is - release dates for a very mainstream modern rock album - is going to be some sort of insurmountable problem to resolve. This didn't need this sort of escalation. Sergecross73 msg me 21:42, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Sergecross73: I invite any interested editors to resolve the listed concerns if they wish. Z1720 (talk) 21:39, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- Earwig also detects a 63.2% copyvio, someone might want to fix that. RedShellMomentum ☎ ✎ 02:44, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- @RedShellMomentum what specifically // Chchcheckit (talk) 21:36, 4 December 2025 (UTC)