Wikipedia talk:WikiProject China
| Home | Discussion | Members |
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject China and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
| This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| WikiProject China was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 6 April 2009. |
paper.people
[edit]Looking at Wang Yi and I see this story in which he writes a speech for Hu Yaobang. Now I am unfamiliar with the source but it appears to at least of some level of party approval. The source is already used to verify When he returned to China in March 1994, Wang was appointed as vice section chief of the Asian section of the foreign ministry and was promoted to section chief the next year. From August 1997 to February 1998, Wang was a visiting scholar at the Institute of Foreign Relations of Georgetown University in the United States. I am thinking to add more detail to the article but I am unsure of how this source should be used. It is possible that the story about him writing a speech is completely made up. I do not think there is anyway to verify that. However, maybe an attributed claim that is a bit more vague works like When interviewed in 2016, former colleges stated that he quickly gained recognition for speech writing. Czarking0 (talk) 05:27, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
- From this same source I see the phrase "党叫干啥就干啥" which could potentially be one of those slogans that makes a worthwhile article ? Czarking0 (talk) 04:22, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Czarking0 That phrase is worded very informally (wikt:啥 is a colloquial contraction of wikt:什么, which itself isn't very formal), so I am surprised to see it being used as a slogan. A brief web search doesn't turn up any excellent sources, but I haven't looked very hard and you may yet find some. I'm guessing this is a phrase that turns up sometimes in party-related documents, but won't be used much in very high-level, formal, official settings. Toadspike [Talk] 17:25, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- I am confused by your idea of formality here though maybe it is a good one. WP has articles like 6-7 (meme) which indicate informal phrases are included. I think the relevant guideline for this would be WP:WORDISSUBJECT. I have not seen sources for 党叫干啥就干啥 that would lead me to believe it passes this guideline though I also have not looked far. Czarking0 (talk) 00:53, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, I'm not saying that we're not allowed to have articles on informal words. In fact, I rather appreciate articles like that! I meant that since this phrase is informal, it's unlikely to have much high-level party endorsement, and thus also unlikely to have enough coverage to meet the GNG. Toadspike [Talk] 07:56, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- I am confused by your idea of formality here though maybe it is a good one. WP has articles like 6-7 (meme) which indicate informal phrases are included. I think the relevant guideline for this would be WP:WORDISSUBJECT. I have not seen sources for 党叫干啥就干啥 that would lead me to believe it passes this guideline though I also have not looked far. Czarking0 (talk) 00:53, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Czarking0 That phrase is worded very informally (wikt:啥 is a colloquial contraction of wikt:什么, which itself isn't very formal), so I am surprised to see it being used as a slogan. A brief web search doesn't turn up any excellent sources, but I haven't looked very hard and you may yet find some. I'm guessing this is a phrase that turns up sometimes in party-related documents, but won't be used much in very high-level, formal, official settings. Toadspike [Talk] 17:25, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- I also see "王毅对群众工作也很重视". I curious about this term "群众工作" which google puts as "mass work". I assume this related to the mass line which has a section about the revival under Xi. First, I want to see what people think is an appropriate translation of 群众工作. I certainly have no problem calling it mass work since that is basically a literal translation; however, in English this is a meaningless jargon phrase. If one can say that 群众工作是习近平的群众路线. Then I think it would be ok to say mass work and pipe link it to mass line. Potentially this means the mass line page should say some more about this term. Czarking0 (talk) 05:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:People's Publishing House (China) § Requested move 19 October 2025. Toadspike [Talk] 17:13, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Would anyone care to finish Draft:Nanko Historical and Geographical Society?
[edit]The article is finished, well formatted, etc. The topic is notable. But it is a translation of article from zh wiki, which contains copyvio text. It needs to be rewritten to eliminate close paragphrasing of the source cited. Would anyone care to help? (It is an article transalted by a student of mine few months ago). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:55, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Piotrus Which source in particular? Toadspike [Talk] 12:59, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Toadspike Based on comments at talk: https://history.nju.edu.cn/02/ee/c28628a459502/page.htm Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, I missed the talk page discussion. I will take a look when I have time. Toadspike [Talk] 23:16, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Toadspike Based on comments at talk: https://history.nju.edu.cn/02/ee/c28628a459502/page.htm Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Discusstion "Two concepts are totally different." at Talk:China (region)
[edit]
There is a discussion which is about redirect to Greater China at Talk:China (region) that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. SoAnnoyedToName (talk) 14:59, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

The article Mi zhi hu lu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Tagged as Unreferenced for almost 5 years. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. WP:NOTHOWTO.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 20:31, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Xinjiang task force
[edit]Anybody else interested in forming a task force for topics related to Xinjiang / East Turkestan? Yue🌙 23:00, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- This is a not strong area of interest of mine but I highly recommend China and Russia for this topic. Czarking0 (talk) 03:01, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Happy to pitch in, Yue. - Amigao (talk) 20:04, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Chinese Indonesians
[edit]Chinese Indonesians has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:47, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

The article China Bio-Immunity Corporation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Tagged for multiple issues over the past 4 years, including complete lack of sources. Does not pass WP:NCORP.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 02:44, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Eurasian Land Bridge
[edit]Eurasian Land Bridge has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:35, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard § Ancient histories
[edit]
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard § Ancient histories. Jumpytoo Talk 17:14, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Sino-Latin America relations#Requested move 22 November 2025
[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Sino-Latin America relations#Requested move 22 November 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 06:49, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Discussion about WikiProject banner templates
[edit]For WikiProjects that participate in rating articles, the banners for talk pages usually say something like:
- "This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale."
There is a proposal to change the default wording on the banners to say "priority" instead of "importance". This could affect the template for your group. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council#Proposal to update wording on WikiProject banners. Stefen 𝕋ower Huddle • Handiwerk 19:39, 6 December 2025 (UTC) (on behalf of the WikiProject Council)
Good article reassessment for Liao dynasty
[edit]Liao dynasty has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:16, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

The article Dinosaur Baby Holy Heroes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Tagged as Unreferenced for 15 and 1/2 years. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. The excessive detail makes this a case for WP:TNT.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 08:43, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
Can someone please find a reference to verify this article? Thank you.4meter4 (talk) 12:29, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- I found these two: [1] and [2]. For some reason they don't appear when clicking on the JSTOR search link. I'll try to figure out where or how to best add them to the article. AwerDiWeGo (talk) 14:30, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Shen Buhai § On translating his name
[edit]
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Shen Buhai § On translating his name. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 07:51, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Lurou Huoshao#Requested move 3 December 2025
[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Lurou Huoshao#Requested move 3 December 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 10:11, 18 December 2025 (UTC)