Wikipedia:Copyright problems
| This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
This page is for listing and discussing possible copyright problems involving text on Wikipedia. On this page, editors handle articles where the copyright status is disputed or where complex cases of infringement are present. Most listings are handled within 1 week, although some may take longer. Interested editors are invited to offer feedback, rewrite infringing content, or request copyright permission.
Listed pages appear in the bottom section of the page. For additional guidance, see below.
To add a new listing, go to today's section.
How to list an article
You should list an article on this page if one of the following applies:
- All revisions of an article have copyright violations (copyvio), and speedy deletion does not apply.
- The removal of copyrighted content has been contested.
- Removal or reversion is complicated or involves a majority of the article.
- You cannot determine whether the text originated from the source or Wikipedia. Do not blank the article in this case.
- The article is eligible for presumptive deletion.
- Other complex situations not listed here or in the section below.
If the article needs to be listed,
What not to list here
- Backwards copy by another source of Wikipedia. Instead, add
{{Backwards copy|Title=title of source|url=link to source|year=2000}}to the article's talk page. - Blatant infringement. Articles that are entirely copyvio can be handled through speedy deletion if it meets the criteria. Do not blank or list the article here if tagged for speedy deletion.
- Non-extensive obvious copyvio. If the copied content is not extensive, you can remove, rewrite, or revert the page to before the text was added. You should place
{{Copyvio-revdel|url=copied source|start=diff of copyvio insertion|end=diff before copyvio removal}}on the article afterwards and warn the contributor of the material to the problem, unless advised not to. The template {{Uw-copyright}} may be used for this purpose. - Requests for revision deletion. These should be handled by placing
{{Copyvio-revdel|url=copied source|start=diff of copyvio insertion|end=diff before copyvio removal}}on the article. - Files. For files that are clear copyright violations, follow the procedure for speedy deletion; otherwise, list the file at Files for Discussion. If the file is on the Commons, they can be handled through Commons speedy deletion or Deletion requests.
- Individual editors. Contributors who repeatedly post copyrighted text or files after appropriate warnings will be blocked from editing to protect the project; see 17 United States Code § 512. If one contributor verifiably inserts multiple copyright violations and systematic review is needed, please file a request at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations.
- Copyright violations without a source. If you cannot find a source of where something could be copied from, do not list the article here. The content may be removed for other reasons, like being unreferenced or violating our biographies of living persons policy.
What text can be reused?
Under the United States law that governs Wikipedia, copyright is automatically assumed as soon as any content (text or other media) is created in a physical form. An author does not need to apply for or claim copyright, for a copyright to exist. One of the following must be present to reuse the content on Wikipedia:
- Explicit statement by the author, stating that the work is either in the public domain or compatibly licensed
- Public domain due to age, source, or lack of originality
- Fair use under our guidelines for non-free content, where the text used is brief and clearly marked with full attribution
If none of the above are present, the text cannot be reused.
Even when the text can be reused, it must be attributed or it will be considered as plagiarism.
Responding to listed articles
Any editor is welcome to investigate articles listed for copyright concerns and remove {{copypaste}} or {{close paraphrasing}} tags when the problem is addressed or disproven. Only administrators, copyright clerks, and VRT agents should remove {{copyvio}} tags and close listings.
Copyright problems is run by volunteers and it usually takes a few days before listings are first investigated.
You can assist in the following ways:
- Providing information on the copyright status of the article
- Obtaining or verifying claims of permission
- Rewriting or removing infringing content without removing {{copyvio}}.
Providing information on copyright statuses
Not every article listed here is a copyright violation. The content may be on Wikipedia first, public domain, compatibly licensed, or below the threshold of originality. Editors can provide information about licensing or public domain status under listings here or on the talk page of the article. A link or a clear explanation is very helpful when a clerk or administrator evaluates the article.
Obtaining/verifying permission
Sometimes material was placed on Wikipedia with the permission of the copyright owner. The owner may be willing to give permission and proper license. Any contributor can write to the owner of copyright and check whether they gave or will give permission. See Wikipedia:Example requests for permission. If a compatible license is placed online at the point of original publication, please provide a link to that under the listing.
More details about the permissions process can be seen below and at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Rewriting or removing content
If an article verifiably has copyvio, the content must be removed or rewritten entirely. If the article is blanked, the rewrite takes place at Talk:PAGENAME/Temp so that the new material can be copied over the old. The listing will link to the specific temporary page. You can directly rewrite on articles tagged for {{close paraphrasing}} or {{copy-paste}}, and remove the tags when the rewrite is complete.
The article should not be copied over without first removing copyvio. Other content from the article can be used, if there is no reason to believe that it may be a copyright issue as well. If the content is copied from an inaccessible source like a book or cannot be verified, please remove all text added by the contributor. If you copy any text from the old article, please leave a note on the listing or in your edit summaries of the rewrite. Reviewing administrators will then preserve the history of the old article.
Please review Wikipedia:Copy-paste and its linked guidelines as necessary to ensure the rewrite is compliant with policy. Repairing plagiarism from permissible sources is usually as simple as supplying proper attribution.
Copyright owners who submitted their own work to Wikipedia (or people editing on their behalf)
If you submitted work to Wikipedia which you had previously published and your submission was marked as a potential infringement of copyright, you must do one of the following to resolve the problem:
- Link to a note permitting reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation, ideally using the email template at WP:CONSENT.
See also Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Emails are handled by volunteers and take time to log permission. Do not worry if the content is deleted; it will be restored if usable permission is logged. Your email will receive a response whether the permission is usable or not. If you have not received a response to your letter within two weeks, it is a good idea to follow up.
Please keep in mind that content previously published elsewhere may not meet Wikipedia's specific guidelines and policies. If you are not familiar with these policies and guidelines, please review especially our core policies. This will prepare you to deal with any other issues with the text that may arise.
Should you choose to rewrite the content rather than release it under the requisite license, please see above.
Clerks and patrolling administrators
Copyright clerks
For a more complete description of clerks and their duties, as well as a list of active clerks, please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Clerks.
Copyright clerks are experienced editors on Wikipedia, especially with copyright policies and their enforcement. On this board, they are trusted to evaluate and close listings and request administrative actions when necessary.
Copyright problems administrators
For a more complete description of administrators on Wikipedia, please see Wikipedia:Administrators.
Any administrator may work the copyright problems board. This may involve evaluating listings personally or completing requests by clerks. Clerks are trusted in their work and their requests may be implemented without double-checking, although any administrator is welcome to review requests and discuss with the clerks in question.
Closing listings
Listings can be processed at any time by anyone, but are not formally closed until a clerk or administrator verifies that all problems are resolved. Pages listed for presumptive deletion stay open for a minimum of 7 days before being processed.
For advice for resolving listings, see Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Instructions (VRT agents, see section there).
{{CPC}} may be used to denote resolutions of listings by administrators, clerks and VRT agents.
Listings of possible copyright problems
Older than 7 days
- Stuart Roy Clarke (history · last edit · rewrite) from two books cited in the article. I don't have access to the books, but this looks very much like it's been copied from them verbatim. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:03, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- WP:REX#Stuart Roy Clarke. Tenshi! (Talk page) 19:36, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Content has been removed from the article presumptively. Sennecaster (Chat) 04:40, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- Draft:Imric Porsolt and Taumata o Kupe have some sentences that I consider closely paraphrased but want a second opinion on before I remove the text. Taumata o Kupe had more obvious close paraphrasing issues that I have already removed. Traumnovelle (talk) 23:14, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Text: 'At the Best Design Awards in 2023, TOA Architects won gold in the Toitanga category, as well as the supreme purple pin, for work which raises the bar for New Zealand design.' Source: 'Toa Architects, which designed Te Taumata o Kupe, won the gold pin as well as the supreme purple pin in the Toitanga section at this year’s Designers Institute of New Zealand Best Design Awards.'
Text: 'The site measures at 600 square feet over two levels.' Source: 'It measures 600 square metres over two levels' Text: 'The building veers from the structure of a conventional wharenui (Māori meeting house) with its rectangular gabled-shaped building.' Source: 'The building form is not that of the conventional Wharenui with a rectangular gabled-shaped building and front porch area.' Text: 'The glass facade is split in two, with the bottom tilted inwards, suggesting alluding to the nautical themes of sails and rudders' Source: 'and the glass’ inward tilt and angles on the red barge suggests the movement of the sails and rudders.' Source: 'the glass facade echoing the stays, while the faceted frame alludes to the shape of a rudder.' Text: 'The diagonal black wind brace which traces the front façade recalls the forms of stays used on Māori sails.' Source: 'The diagonal black wind brace on the front façade follows the form of stays used on Māori sails' Text: 'The glass panels illustrate Kupe's journey, drawing inspiration from whakairo rākau and kōwhaiwhai traditions as well as contemporary Māori artist Cliff Whiting's aesthetic and colour palette.' Source: 'Rawiri based his visual language on the traditions of whakairo rākau and kōwhaiwhai (scroll painting) and the contemporary aesthetic and colour palette pioneered by the Māori modernist artist, Cliff Whiting.' Text: 'TOA Architects designed the raised platform of the building to reference the Society Islands taumata (hill) from where Kupe departed for Aotearoa New Zealand' Source: 'According to TOA Architects, this raised platform is a direct reference to Society Islands’ taumata from which Kupe departed.' Text: 'Imric Porsolt was born in Pozony, Hungary (now Bratislava, Slovakia) in 1909. Living in the Austro-Hungarian Empire, he learnt both Hungarian and German.' Source: 'Born in Pozony in Hungary in 1909 (now Bratislava in Slovakia), Porsolt grew up speaking both Hungarian and German as a citizen of the Austro-Hungarian empire' Text: 'Simultaneously, several avant garde art and architecture movements were growing and modernism was catching on as a depature from traditionalism' Source: 'Modernism represented a radical departure for him from the old way of life of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.' |
- As per the instructions, @Traumnovelle: can you tag the problematic material with {{copyvio}}? Tenshi! (Talk page) 07:46, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
- I have done that, although it blanks the whole page which I find to be a bit extreme based on the perceived issue here. Traumnovelle (talk) 23:12, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
- I added some more examples from the first paragraph, some are quite blatant examples of close paraphrasing but others are debatable. Traumnovelle (talk) 09:22, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- And more examples. I haven't gone through the entire article but I now believe the article may required to be fully deleted due to the extensive close paraphrasing. Traumnovelle (talk) 21:50, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Traumnovelle ~2026-32797-61 (talk) 16:15, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
- I added some more examples from the first paragraph, some are quite blatant examples of close paraphrasing but others are debatable. Traumnovelle (talk) 09:22, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- I have done that, although it blanks the whole page which I find to be a bit extreme based on the perceived issue here. Traumnovelle (talk) 23:12, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
1 Albert Street, Auckland also has these issues to a perhaps lesser degree. I'm unsure if a full CCI is warranted or not on the contributor. Much of the content is cited to a book I don't have. Traumnovelle (talk) 21:44, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Text: 'The building's features earned it the title of the 'Crown Jewel of Auckland'.' Source: 'Completed in 1972, the building’s striking features once earned it the title of the ‘Crown Jewel of Auckland’.' (the non-standard spelling even has me wondering if it was just copypasted and then edited) Text: 'Ignite Architects were approached in 2022 to renovate the building, to meet evolving workplace requirements' Source: 'Ignite was approached to redevelop the podium and lower levels of the building with the aim of bringing it in-line with contemporary workplace requirements.' Text: 'Modernism in New Zealand took off in the 1950s and 1960s during the post-WWII economic boom' Source: 'Modernism took off during the post-war economic boom. In the 1950s and ’60s...' |
- Face transplant (history · last edit · rewrite) from Category:Articles with close paraphrasing from June 2025.
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. MCE89 (talk) 13:45, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Plan on reforming Party and state institutions (history · last edit · rewrite) from [1] as part of Category:Articles with close paraphrasing from June 2025.
- This looks like there's some PD copying since Central Committee works are considered public domain commons:COM:CHINA Sennecaster (Chat) 04:51, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- Banu Kırbağ (history · last edit · rewrite) from Category:Articles with close paraphrasing from August 2025. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:06, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Sennecaster (Chat) 02:19, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- The Floor (American game show) (history · last edit · rewrite) from The Futon Critic listings. I had reported this earlier at ANI, but was recommended to come here instead (honestly didn't know of or think of coming to this!). Here is my original report from ANI:
Extended content
|
|---|
|
I've previously attempted solving this issue myself last year, but was reverted multiple times ([2], [3], [4]), and it appears that someone(s) readded similar WP:COPYVIO summaries, and it's just continued on to now. For example, the two episodes added on today are season 5 episodes 11 and 12, "The Ice King Melts" and "The Fight to The Final" The two summaries added for those episodes here are as follows:
Via the episodes' listing on The Futon Critic, these are their respective summaries via that:
While not purely the same exact thing, as WP:COPYVIO notes, "Even inserting text copied with some changes can be a copyright violation if there is substantial linguistic similarity in creative language or sentence structure; this is known as close paraphrasing, which can also raise concerns about plagiarism". Just as another quick example, season 5 episode 1, "New Year, New Floor". Once again, the summary on the Wikipedia article:
And via the episode listing on The Futon Critic:
Even the following episode, "The Expert-Slayer Strikes", gives quite a closely-paraphrased summary:
I've been trying to see how (possibly) bad it is through the Copyvio Detector, but I'm guessing it is likely yielding low percentages for the article due to how lengthy it currently is. On another note, I'd imagine with how lengthy the article is, I would suggest splitting it up into separate season articles, as previously suggested at Talk:The Floor (American game show)#Should we split the show into its respective seasons?. Should be noted that the show has already been renewed for a sixth and seventh season, so if it is not split now, it'll only be getting worse as time goes on. |
Will also note that I have not warned any contributor(s) on their talk page, as this has been over sometime and likely involves more than one contributor, but I have issued a notice on the article's talk page at Talk:The Floor (American game show)#WP:COPYVIO issues and article splitting. I'd imagine if indeed considered copyright violation(s), there are too many revisions that would need deleting. However, I would recommend removing said copyright violation(s) and retaining the actual episodes' game summaries, as I'd previously attempted doing (such as this). Magitroopa (talk) 01:26, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- User:Jazzyshazzy12/sandbox (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.royalwarrant.org/company/hildon-ltd. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:12, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Sennecaster (Chat) 04:28, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- St Vincent Gardens (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://web.archive.org/web/20060117053714/http://www.portphillip.vic.gov.au/stvincent_gardens.html. Rangasyd (talk) 07:51, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. MCE89 (talk) 13:09, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- Charles Fickert (history · last edit · rewrite) presumptive deletion from 20151115. Relisted from Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2026 May 9 Tenshi! (Talk page) 22:05, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Article deleted due to copyright concerns. Complex/Rational 00:31, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
- Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development (history · last edit · rewrite) from Category:Articles with close paraphrasing from September 2025.
Article deleted due to copyright concerns. Tenshi! (Talk page) 21:34, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
- Association of Commercial Television in Europe (history · last edit · rewrite) from [5] as part of Category:Articles with close paraphrasing from September 2025.
- Dhuppani Waterfall (history · last edit · rewrite) from [6] as part of Category:Articles with close paraphrasing from September 2025. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:51, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Article cleaned, revision deletion requested. Tenshi! (Talk page) 09:30, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
Revision deletion completed. Tenshi! (Talk page) 19:38, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Songs about Wikipedia (history · last edit · rewrite) Note: While I am filing this under Wikipedia:Songs about Wikipedia, I do not think that page should be discussed, as I’m only doing that for organisational purposes. Rather, what should be discussed is the following:
See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Songs about Wikipedia. Wikipedian Talk to me! or not… 20:53, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
- Ones my uncultured ass doesn't recognize: Wikipedia:Songs about Wikipedia/'Pedia Ga Ga Wikipedia:Songs about Wikipedia/Oh, Wikipedia Wikipedia:Songs about Wikipedia/Revert It Wikipedia:Songs about Wikipedia/Troll & Vandal Wikipedia:Songs about Wikipedia/There A Vandal Goes Wikipedia:Songs about Wikipedia/Total Edit to the Text Wikipedia:Songs about Wikipedia/Still Unbanned Wikipedia:Songs about Wikipedia/Spammaz on the rise. Up to why your grounds identified. Im not dealing with the NFC violation aspect until we actually figure out what everything is, which will be extremely fun for someone that doesn't know a lot of popular music from any era besides Romantic and earlier. Sennecaster (Chat) 04:52, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- I used the
sung to the tune of
column on the main page of it as a basis of which to nominate originally, which may be helpful for determining which ones are which. For instance Wikipedia:Songs about Wikipedia/Oh, Wikipedia is a parody of Calling America per that chart, and a look at the lyrics seems to confirm the connection. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 05:24, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- I used the
- Lietbertus (history · last edit · rewrite) from http://www.web.pdx.edu/~ott/hst399/vitalietberti/index.html. Relisting from Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2026 June 13 because it appears to have been deleted from the main page without a response.
Not entirely sure what to do here. This content has been on the article since 2007, but the source says that it should not be cited without permission. I am also not sure if it could be speedied, considering there is some content that is not cited to that source although it is not cited at all, meaning the article would be unsourced. BlaqWiedow (talk) 16:57, 25 June 2026 (UTC)- @BlaqWiedow: For the record, relists are for when deleting/removing the material would violate how listings are processed, e.g. deleting an article without copyvio tags, PDELs which would stub an article, or when the author hasn't been notified. The old listing should have been readded to the main page, but since it's here now there's not much point. Please leave relisting to admins/clerks. Tenshi! (Talk page) 19:43, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Tenshi Hinanawi My apologies, I did not realize there was a better way to do it. BlaqWiedow (talk) 19:48, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
No copyright concern. Material is PD, license compatible, or ineligible for copyright protection. WP:COPYLINK allows such citations/links. Tenshi! (Talk page) 13:55, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
- @BlaqWiedow: For the record, relists are for when deleting/removing the material would violate how listings are processed, e.g. deleting an article without copyvio tags, PDELs which would stub an article, or when the author hasn't been notified. The old listing should have been readded to the main page, but since it's here now there's not much point. Please leave relisting to admins/clerks. Tenshi! (Talk page) 19:43, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
- Splendor (motorcycle) (history · last edit · rewrite) from ?, wasn't listed. Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:02, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
- TVS Apache (history · last edit · rewrite) from ?, wasn't listed. Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:02, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hero Honda CBZ Series (history · last edit · rewrite) from ?, wasn't listed. Tenshi! (Talk page) 09:17, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
- Draft:Congregation B'nai Israel of Glassport (history · last edit · rewrite) from [7] Never listed at copyright problems but a violation seems likely given the copyvio report. Aasim (話す) 16:53, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
Article cleaned, revision deletion requested. Tenshi! (Talk page) 19:37, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
Revision deletion completed. Tenshi! (Talk page) 00:49, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
New listings
New listings are made on daily reports transcluded on this page and are not directly added to it. To add a new listing, please go to today's section. Instructions for adding new listings can be found at How to list an article. Editors may resolve issues with listings at any time, save for presumptive deletion. See the section on responding for more information.
- Bada Valley (history · last edit · rewrite) from [8] Looks like close paraphrasing to me, in some cases like direct copying, but I am not sure. TurboSuperA+[talk] 09:48, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- Amos 'n' Andy (history · last edit · rewrite) Sorry to dump this could-normally-handle-it-mostly-myself matter here, but I'm dealing with physical pain today and cannot concentrate well. Amos 'n' Andy appears to have a three paragraph quote from a 2005 source that was added in 2006 and has been there since. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 21:20, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- Laurent Dareau (history · last edit · rewrite) from [9]. Not the entire article, but it's woven in throughout. Something also feels fishy about the tone of the rest of it, which could be any combination of new editor, autobiography, LLM usage, or my hackles being raised. Snowman304|talk 16:45, 22 July 2026 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2026 July 23
Footer
Wikipedia's current date is 23 July 2026. Put new article listings in Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2026 July 23. Files should be handled by speedy deletion or Wikipedia:Files for discussion.