Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intrexx

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. $Salvio giuliano$ 08:01, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Intrexx

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks significant coverage by secondary sources. Brandon (talk) 07:12, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software, and Germany. Brandon (talk) 07:12, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Heavily promotional, buzzword-laden, and sourced primarily to the platform's own website. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:47, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We edited the article. IntrexxKonto2025 (talk) 12:14, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Per lack of WP:SIGCOV. Svartner (talk) 04:50, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article created and developed by a succession of single-purpose accounts at the end of which the article is little more than a product feature site supported by primary sources. Appearance as a niche player in a Gartner MQ (CMSwire commentary, 2012) is insufficient to demonstrate attained notability for a product. AllyD (talk) 07:18, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.