User talk:voorts
| Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
|
|
 |
Good Article Gazette, Issue 15
[edit]
| Ongoing discussions | News | Current statistics |
|---|---|---|
|
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:03, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Golan Heights on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 21:30, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
User talk:Jazrawi Studio
[edit]Sorry I reverted your edit to User talk:Jazrawi Studio. I couldn't figure out an easy way to fix the misnested tag, and I figured that the easiest way to get it done right was to let you do it again. —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:21, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
Did you even look at your review decline before or after you saved it, or after you reverted me? The sentence "I understand the reasons for my block and I apologize for my mistakes." appears seven times! I studied the problem and figured out the solution, and now "I understand the reasons for my block and I apologize for my mistakes." appears just once. Preview is your friend. —Anomalocaris (talk) 19:16, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
- In my edit summary when I reverted you, I commented that you shouldn't revert unblock declines and that if you couldn't figure out the issue with the template, somebody else would. There was no urgent need to fix this issue. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:46, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
- Regardless of the need to fix the misnested tag, there was the urgent need for the section to have a reasonable display. You left the page with a ludicrously unreasonable display, and it urgently needed to have a reasonable display. I assumed that you would take pride in your work and review again and do it right. Unfortunately, in this case (which I hope is an outlier), you were careless and left the page in a horrific condition for a second time. I fixed for you. Please take pride in your work and don't leave pages in horrific condition, especially after someone reverts you. Cheers! —Anomalocaris (talk) 23:30, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Anomalocaris: Once an admin declines an unblock request, that declined request must remain on the talk page per the template's text. You should never remove a declined unblock request from a user's talk page. There is nothing urgent about fixing the talk page of a blocked editor who hasn't edited for two weeks; you could have waited for another editor who patrols template error categories to fix the issue or asked for assistance at the teahouse. As for your assertion that I was careless, there is a user script that I and many other admins use. Please remember to assume good faith. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:50, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
- Regardless of the need to fix the misnested tag, there was the urgent need for the section to have a reasonable display. You left the page with a ludicrously unreasonable display, and it urgently needed to have a reasonable display. I assumed that you would take pride in your work and review again and do it right. Unfortunately, in this case (which I hope is an outlier), you were careless and left the page in a horrific condition for a second time. I fixed for you. Please take pride in your work and don't leave pages in horrific condition, especially after someone reverts you. Cheers! —Anomalocaris (talk) 23:30, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
Thank you — Talk page proposals complete (Kronk Gym)
[edit]Thank you — Talk page proposals complete
[edit]Hello voorts, and thank you again for unblocking and renaming the DetroitBoxingHistory account. I wanted to let you know that the Talk page proposals for Talk:Kronk Gym are now complete. We have submitted a comprehensive set of COI edit requests covering a full article expansion — including a new History section (founding 1921 through to the current revival), an Emanuel Steward biography, Thomas Hearns and Johnathon Banks subsections, a world champions table, an Olympic history table, an external links section, and leadership biographies, all with cited sources.
We are very much looking forward to a neutral editor reviewing the Talk page and implementing the proposed changes so the article can be brought up to a standard that reflects KRONK Gym's historical significance to Detroit and to boxing. If there is anything further required on our end to facilitate the review, please do let us know.
With thanks, ~2026-33747-15 ~2026-33747-15 (talk) 15:05, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
- Please log into your account. You say "we" and "our". We have a one account, one person rule. Please confirm only one person is using your account. Additionally, there is a backlog of edit requests. Someone will get to yours when they can. Everyone here is a volunteer. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:03, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
Review and thanks
[edit]Thanks for flagging the Arlene "Dozay" Christmas article for subjective language. I have fixed and hope to remove the maintenance box. Happy to have you review again. Krad24 (talk) 11:42, 9 June 2026 (UTC)