Jump to content

User talk:Qwerfjkl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Special Barnstar
Short Description Barnstar
Special Barnstar
Articles for Creation Barnstar
Team Barnstar
Short Description Barnstar
Reviewer Barnstar
Team Barnstar
Hacker's Barnstar
Category Barnstar
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
This user has redirect autopatrolled pseudo-rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has new page reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Qwerfjkl (bot))

It is 2:13 AM where this user lives.



Good Bot!

[edit]

Qwerfjkl (bot) – Rick_Norwood

[edit]

Page: Controlled Substances Act

Diff: Special:Diff/1325539502

Comment/question: I was still actively editing this page when the bot reverted my edit. I plan to see if I can revert the bot's deletion, continue the edit, and then post my current work. This will be done in fifteen minutes at most. I hope this is ok.

Rick Norwood (talk) 17:42, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Norwood, the bot did not revert your edit. — Qwerfjkltalk 18:57, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I must have misunderstood the message. Rick Norwood (talk) 19:43, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections - Discussion Phase

[edit]

The discussion phase of the December 2025 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • Dec 4–8 - Discussion phase (we are here)
  • Dec 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Discussion phase.

On December 9, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which typically lasts between a couple days and a week. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate who has not been recalled must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. A candidate that has been recalled must have at least 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections - Discussion Phase

[edit]
Copied from Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) § Administrator Elections - Discussion Phase because this page is listed on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Subscribe.

The discussion phase of the December 2025 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • Dec 4–8 - Discussion phase (we are here)
  • Dec 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Discussion phase.

On December 9, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which typically lasts between a couple days and a week. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate who has not been recalled must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. A candidate that has been recalled must have at least 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Curramore (04:22, 4 December 2025)

[edit]

I want to add to the entry concerning Colin Hollis Retired Australian Politician, in that he has recently been awarded two major Awards which should be added --Curramore (talk) 04:22, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Curramore, do you have a connection to Colin Hollis, and do you have a (reliable) source to verify he was awarded these awards? — Qwerfjkltalk 10:58, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Qmack0 (22:31, 6 December 2025)

[edit]

Hi, I’ve only recently created an account due to wanting to write an article about an actor who has many credits in varied media, but not as many news articles, and who had a previous article deleted because of citation/formatting/impartiality issues. What is considered acceptable sourcing for listing an actor’s credits? Can I use, for example, Apple TV’s cataloguing of an actor’s roles, or would IMDB be acceptable? Also, is there a specific way to check whether a source is considered “reputable” for Wikipedia article purposes, or a list of acceptable sources? I just don’t want to have to pester about every single thing, and the guidance article I found was too vague for the kinds of questions I had. Thanks in advance. --Qmack0 (talk) 22:31, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Qmack0, neither would be suitable. IMDB is user-generated content. I'm not entirely sure what you mean by Apple TV, but if it's just shown when watching Apple TV then it's also unsuitable. There is Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources, but you should use your own judgement about whether a source is reliable in a particular case. — Qwerfjkltalk 18:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Qwerfjkl (bot) – ~2025-32146-34

[edit]

Page: Javan_rhinoceros

Diff: Special:Diff/1326187878

Comment/question: I made no changes to references; any errors were pre-existing, I believe. ~2025-32146-34 (talk) 19:28, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~2025-32146-34, it appears you inadvertently introduced a space in |title=Javan Rhinos to be Transferred to Cikepuh Wildlife Reserve, changing it to |tit le= which is not recognised by the template. — Qwerfjkltalk 09:24, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This was later fixed by Citation bot. — Qwerfjkltalk 09:26, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors – December 2025 Newsletter

[edit]
Guild of Copy Editors December 2025 Newsletter

Hello, and welcome to the December newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. If you'd like to be notified of upcoming drives and blitzes, and other GOCE activities, the best method is to add our announcements box to your watchlist.

Election news: The Guild's coordinators play an important role in the WikiProject, making sure nearly everything runs smoothly and on time. Editors experienced in drives or blitzes and in good standing (unblocked and without sanctions) are invited to nominate themselves or another editor (with their permission, of course) to be a Guild coordinator until 23:59 on 15 December (UTC). The voting phase begins at 00:01 on 16 December and runs until 23:59 on 31 December. Questions may be asked of candidates at any stage in the process. Elected coordinators will serve a six-month term from 1 January through 30 June 2026.

September Drive: 43 of the 63 editors who signed up for the September Backlog Elimination Drive edited 693,541 words in 265 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

October Blitz: 14 of the 15 editors who signed up for the October Copy Editing Blitz edited 75,108 words in 31 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

November Drive: 38 of the 65 editors who signed up for the November Backlog Elimination Drive edited 590,816 words in 240 articles. Barnstars awarded are posted here.

December Blitz: The December Blitz will begin at 00:00 on 14 December (UTC) and will end on 20 December at 23:59. Sign up here. Barnstars awarded will be posted here.

Progress report: As of 01:49, 8 December 2025 (UTC), GOCE copy editors have completed 293 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 1,730 articles.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Dhtwiki, GoldRomean, Miniapolis and Mox Eden.

To stop receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2025).

Administrator changes

added
readded Valereee
removed

CheckUser changes

removed Spicy

Technical news

  • Starting on November 4, the IP addresses of logged-out editors are no longer being publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account associated with their edits.
  • Administrators will now find that Special:MergeHistory is now significantly more flexible about what it can merge. It can now merge sections taken from the middle of the history of the source (rather than only the start) and insert revisions anywhere in the history of the destination page (rather than only the start). T382958

Miscellaneous


Question from Main Dannea (17:25, 8 December 2025)

[edit]

How do I set a forum for the 4321 "XYZ--- ERO strategic group? Which was admit won a criminal record. --Main Dannea (talk) 17:25, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Main DNA

[edit]

4321 "XYZ----ERO" forum Main Dannea (talk) 17:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-50

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 17:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections - Voting Phase

[edit]

The voting phase of the December 2025 administrator elections has started and will continue until Dec 15 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • Dec 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:06, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections - Voting Phase

[edit]
Copied from Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) § Administrator Elections - Voting Phase because this page is listed on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Subscribe.

The voting phase of the December 2025 administrator elections has started and will continue until Dec 15 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • Dec 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:06, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from BayF7 (17:58, 11 December 2025)

[edit]

How to create a new page for a new person? --BayF7 (talk) 17:58, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BayF7, Welcome! Creating a new article from scratch is extremely challenging, and new editors are strongly recommended to spend a few months learning how Wikipedia works, by making improvements to some of our existing seven million articles before trying it. When you do decide to have a go at a new article, you are highly encouraged to read Help:Your first article. If you haven't already also check out the tutorial; it's a lot of fun! Happy editing! — Qwerfjkltalk 10:14, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from AeushPorche (20:18, 11 December 2025)

[edit]

hello, what to do if i see wrong information written? --AeushPorche (talk) 20:18, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AeushPorche, you can correct it. If it has a reliable reference backing it up, it is better to discuss on the talk page first, and make sure you have a reference to verify any new information you have (unless trivial). — Qwerfjkltalk 10:15, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Daplatman17 (01:00, 13 December 2025)

[edit]

Hello --Daplatman17 (talk) 01:00, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! — Qwerfjkltalk 12:47, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
how are you Qwerfjkl? Daplatman17 (talk) 00:35, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well. — Qwerfjkltalk 15:55, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am glad I am doing well to I like platypuses I know everything about them Daplatman17 (talk) 16:03, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft

[edit]

Hi @Qwerfjkl can you review my article? DraftButterflyTz (talk) 15:53, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ButterflyTz, you can submit it with the button on the page. I cannot read Persian, so cannot evaluate the sources. — Qwerfjkltalk 20:15, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
How can move it without submission?
sometimes they don’t answer ButterflyTz (talk) 06:25, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ButterflyTz, you can press the button labelled "Submit draft for review" to submit it. — Qwerfjkltalk 15:55, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-51

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:01, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I need some help addressing some issues identified by "Qwerfjkl (bot)" on the above page. The old page had out of date information and I updated it with input from the organization. I used the incorrecct citation format originally but after it was flagged, I corrected the error.

However, the issue window still appears at the top of the page.

What do I have to do edit to ensure compliance.

Thank you,

KLightfoots KLightfoot2025 (talk) 03:20, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KLightfoot2025, your edits to the article seem to have removed a large amount of useful content and added large unhelpful content in its place. I think it would be better if the article was reverted back to the older revision and then any useful information or references can be reintroduced. — Qwerfjkltalk 16:12, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
The old article contained a lot of incorrect and unrelated information regarding the Wireless Power Consortium and its products Qi and Ki. The new information is verified and referenced in the citations.
Thank you, Kevin KLightfoot2025 (talk) 22:38, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Qwerfjkl (bot) – LaMarmora1854_Explanation_regarding_incorrect_citations

[edit]

Page: Russia–Turkey_relations

Diff: Special:Diff/1327297575

Comment/question: [[Three days ago, on 13 December 2025, after I finished editing the Wikipedia article "Russia-Turkey_relations", I received an alert. That alert was an automated message from Qwerfjkl (bot), in which I was briefed that my edit supposedly included one or more referencing errors, which fall under the category of "missing title error". Since my edit was quite large (I made numerous grammatical corrections, added many hyperlinks, and references, which increased the article's data size by 3,524 bytes), I was not aware of the exact change Qwerfjkl had referred to. Additionally, the bot may have made a mistake, since I always try to be extremely careful when editing articles on Wikipedia, especially when inserting citations into the articles' text. With that being said, would it be possible for any of the Wikipedia administrators with more experience and software skills, or an AI system (bot), to take a look at my edit once again, to brief me on which exact citation (if any) was added into that article in an incorrect way? I thank you in advance for your help.]]

LaMarmora1854 (talk) 13:28, 16 December 2025 (UTC) LaMarmora1854 (talk) 13:28, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LaMarmora1854, you missed out |title= when you added
<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2022-003495_EN.html |access-date=2025-12-13 |website=www.europarl.europa.eu}}</ref>
. — Qwerfjkltalk 16:00, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Black Gryph0n has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 17 § Black Gryph0n until a consensus is reached. ConeKota (talk) 15:20, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 December 2025

[edit]