User talk:Qwerfjkl
| This is Qwerfjkl's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: A, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73Auto-archiving period: 15 days |
Good Bot!
[edit]
Snugglebuns has given you microchips! Microchips promote WikiLove (📖💞) and hopefully this one has made your day more efficient. It is the food best preferred by bots. 🤖 Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else microchips, whether it be someone you have had robot wars with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the goodness of microchips by adding {{subst:Microchips for you}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
Qwerfjkl (bot) – Rick_Norwood
[edit]Page: Controlled Substances Act
Diff: Special:Diff/1325539502
Comment/question: I was still actively editing this page when the bot reverted my edit. I plan to see if I can revert the bot's deletion, continue the edit, and then post my current work. This will be done in fifteen minutes at most. I hope this is ok.
Rick Norwood (talk) 17:42, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
- Rick Norwood, the bot did not revert your edit. — Qwerfjkltalk 18:57, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. I must have misunderstood the message. Rick Norwood (talk) 19:43, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Administrator Elections - Discussion Phase
[edit]The discussion phase of the December 2025 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
- Dec 4–8 - Discussion phase (we are here)
- Dec 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase
- Scrutineering phase
We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Discussion phase.
On December 9, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which typically lasts between a couple days and a week. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate who has not been recalled must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. A candidate that has been recalled must have at least 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Administrator Elections - Discussion Phase
[edit]- Copied from Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) § Administrator Elections - Discussion Phase because this page is listed on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Subscribe.
The discussion phase of the December 2025 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
- Dec 4–8 - Discussion phase (we are here)
- Dec 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase
- Scrutineering phase
We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Discussion phase.
On December 9, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which typically lasts between a couple days and a week. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate who has not been recalled must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. A candidate that has been recalled must have at least 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
I want to add to the entry concerning Colin Hollis Retired Australian Politician, in that he has recently been awarded two major Awards which should be added --Curramore (talk) 04:22, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- Curramore, do you have a connection to Colin Hollis, and do you have a (reliable) source to verify he was awarded these awards? — Qwerfjkltalk 10:58, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I’ve only recently created an account due to wanting to write an article about an actor who has many credits in varied media, but not as many news articles, and who had a previous article deleted because of citation/formatting/impartiality issues. What is considered acceptable sourcing for listing an actor’s credits? Can I use, for example, Apple TV’s cataloguing of an actor’s roles, or would IMDB be acceptable? Also, is there a specific way to check whether a source is considered “reputable” for Wikipedia article purposes, or a list of acceptable sources? I just don’t want to have to pester about every single thing, and the guidance article I found was too vague for the kinds of questions I had. Thanks in advance. --Qmack0 (talk) 22:31, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- Qmack0, neither would be suitable. IMDB is user-generated content. I'm not entirely sure what you mean by Apple TV, but if it's just shown when watching Apple TV then it's also unsuitable. There is Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources, but you should use your own judgement about whether a source is reliable in a particular case. — Qwerfjkltalk 18:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Qwerfjkl (bot) – ~2025-32146-34
[edit]Page: Javan_rhinoceros
Diff: Special:Diff/1326187878
Comment/question: I made no changes to references; any errors were pre-existing, I believe. ~2025-32146-34 (talk) 19:28, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-32146-34, it appears you inadvertently introduced a space in
|title=Javan Rhinos to be Transferred to Cikepuh Wildlife Reserve, changing it to|tit le=which is not recognised by the template. — Qwerfjkltalk 09:24, 8 December 2025 (UTC)- This was later fixed by Citation bot. — Qwerfjkltalk 09:26, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors – December 2025 Newsletter
[edit]| Guild of Copy Editors December 2025 Newsletter
Hello, and welcome to the December newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. If you'd like to be notified of upcoming drives and blitzes, and other GOCE activities, the best method is to add our announcements box to your watchlist. Election news: The Guild's coordinators play an important role in the WikiProject, making sure September Drive: 43 of the 63 editors who signed up for the September Backlog Elimination Drive edited 693,541 words in 265 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. October Blitz: 14 of the 15 editors who signed up for the October Copy Editing Blitz edited 75,108 words in 31 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. November Drive: 38 of the 65 editors who signed up for the November Backlog Elimination Drive edited 590,816 words in 240 articles. Barnstars awarded are posted here. December Blitz: The December Blitz will begin at 00:00 on 14 December (UTC) and will end on 20 December at 23:59. Sign up here. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 01:49, 8 December 2025 (UTC), GOCE copy editors have completed 293 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 1,730 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Dhtwiki, GoldRomean, Miniapolis and Mox Eden. To stop receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2025
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2025).

- Starting on November 4, the IP addresses of logged-out editors are no longer being publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account associated with their edits.
- Administrators will now find that Special:MergeHistory is now significantly more flexible about what it can merge. It can now merge sections taken from the middle of the history of the source (rather than only the start) and insert revisions anywhere in the history of the destination page (rather than only the start). T382958
- The December 2025 administrator elections are scheduled from Nov 25 – Dec 15.
- An Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in December 2025, with over 1,000 drafts awaiting review from the past two months. In addition to AfC participants, all administrators and new page patrollers can help review using the Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
Question from Main Dannea (17:25, 8 December 2025)
[edit]How do I set a forum for the 4321 "XYZ--- ERO strategic group? Which was admit won a criminal record. --Main Dannea (talk) 17:25, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Main DNA
[edit]4321 "XYZ----ERO" forum Main Dannea (talk) 17:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Tech News: 2025-50
[edit]Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Weekly highlight
- Anybody who wishes to secure their user account can now use two-factor authentication (2FA). This is available to all registered users of all Wikimedia projects. This is part of the Account Security initiative. Later, 2FA will be required for all users who can take security- or privacy-sensitive actions.
Updates for editors
- Following last week's deployments, the Add a link feature, which allows editors to add suggested links during editing, will be available to an additional 33 Wikipedias starting on 9 December. This expansion is possible thanks to the new prediction model that now supports all languages, including those that were previously not covered. While the feature has been available on most Wikipedias for some time, this rollout brings us closer to using the improved model everywhere. If you have any questions or would like more details please contact Trizek (WMF).
- Last week, the Search Platform team added transliterated as-you-type search suggestions to Georgian wikis. If there are only a few regular search suggestions, then queries in Latin or Cyrillic script are now rewritten into Georgian script to look for more matches. For example, searching for either bedniereba or бедниереба will now suggest the existing article about ბედნიერება ("happiness"). You can recommend other languages where transliterated suggestions would be useful on Phabricator for future development.
- Later this week, a controlled experiment will begin for editors on the 100 largest Wikipedias who are editing a section in the mobile web visual editor. 50% of these editors will notice a new "Edit full page" button that will enable them to expand their editing session to the whole page. This feature is intended to make it easier for people on mobile web to edit any article section, regardless of which section-edit icon they tapped to begin. The experiment will last ~4 weeks. You can find more details about the project.
- Later this week, the Reader Growth team will launch a mobile web experiment to expand all article sections by default (currently they are collapsed by default) and pin the section header the user is currently reading to the top of the page. The experiment will affect 10% of users on Arabic, Chinese, French, Indonesian, and Vietnamese Wikipedias. [1]
- The Wikipedia Year in Review 2025, a feature in the Wikipedia mobile apps (iOS and Android) that provides users with a personalised summary of their engagement with Wikipedia over the year, is now available on the iOS and Android apps. This edition includes expanded personalised insights, improved reading highlights, new donor messaging, and updated designs. Open the app to view your Year in Review and explore your reading journey from 2025.
- A recent software bug caused edits made with VisualEditor to make unintended changes to wikitext, including removing whitespace and replacing spaces with underscores in wikilinks inside citations. This was partially fixed last week, and further fixes are in progress. Editors who used VisualEditor between November 28 and December 2 should review their edits for unexpected modifications. [2]
View all 23 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week. For example, the incorrect handling of URLs copied from the address bar of Microsoft Edge users, has been resolved. [3]
Updates for technical contributors
- Starting this week, users of the "Improved Syntax Highlighting" beta feature will have CodeMirror as the editor for Lua, JavaScript, CSS, JSON and Vue content models, instead of CodeEditor. With this, the linters will be upgraded. This is part of a larger effort to eventually replace CodeEditor and provide a consistent code editing experience. [4]
- Developers are encouraged to take the 2025 Developer Satisfaction Survey, which remains open until 5 January 2026. If you build software for the Wikimedia ecosystem and would like to share your experiences or feedback, your participation is greatly appreciated. [5]
- There is no new MediaWiki version this week.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
MediaWiki message delivery 17:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Administrator Elections - Voting Phase
[edit]The voting phase of the December 2025 administrator elections has started and will continue until Dec 15 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Voting phase.
As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
- Dec 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase
- Scrutineering phase
In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:06, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Administrator Elections - Voting Phase
[edit]- Copied from Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) § Administrator Elections - Voting Phase because this page is listed on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Subscribe.
The voting phase of the December 2025 administrator elections has started and will continue until Dec 15 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Voting phase.
As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
- Dec 9–15 - SecurePoll voting phase
- Scrutineering phase
In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:06, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
How to create a new page for a new person? --BayF7 (talk) 17:58, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- BayF7, Welcome! Creating a new article from scratch is extremely challenging, and new editors are strongly recommended to spend a few months learning how Wikipedia works, by making improvements to some of our existing seven million articles before trying it. When you do decide to have a go at a new article, you are highly encouraged to read Help:Your first article. If you haven't already also check out the tutorial; it's a lot of fun! Happy editing! — Qwerfjkltalk 10:14, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
Question from AeushPorche (20:18, 11 December 2025)
[edit]hello, what to do if i see wrong information written? --AeushPorche (talk) 20:18, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- AeushPorche, you can correct it. If it has a reliable reference backing it up, it is better to discuss on the talk page first, and make sure you have a reference to verify any new information you have (unless trivial). — Qwerfjkltalk 10:15, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
Question from Daplatman17 (01:00, 13 December 2025)
[edit]Hello --Daplatman17 (talk) 01:00, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- Hi! — Qwerfjkltalk 12:47, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- how are you Qwerfjkl? Daplatman17 (talk) 00:35, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- Well. — Qwerfjkltalk 15:55, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- I am glad I am doing well to I like platypuses I know everything about them Daplatman17 (talk) 16:03, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- Well. — Qwerfjkltalk 15:55, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- how are you Qwerfjkl? Daplatman17 (talk) 00:35, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
Draft
[edit]Hi @Qwerfjkl can you review my article? DraftButterflyTz (talk) 15:53, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- ButterflyTz, you can submit it with the button on the page. I cannot read Persian, so cannot evaluate the sources. — Qwerfjkltalk 20:15, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- How can move it without submission?
- sometimes they don’t answer ButterflyTz (talk) 06:25, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- ButterflyTz, you can press the button labelled "Submit draft for review" to submit it. — Qwerfjkltalk 15:55, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
Tech News: 2025-51
[edit]Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Updates for editors
View all 18 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week. For example, one of the fixes addressed an issue for temporary accounts adding an external URL, which triggered an hCaptcha request in more cases than intended, and did not display the required popup on the first attempt to publish the edit. [6]
Updates for technical contributors
- To improve database and site performance, external links to Wikimedia projects will no longer be stored in the database. This means they will not be searchable in Special:LinkSearch, will not be checked by the Spam Blacklist or AbuseFilter as new links, and will not be in the
externallinkstable on database replicas. In the future this may be extended to other highly-linked trusted websites on a per-wiki basis, such as Creative Commons links on Wikimedia Commons. [7]
Detailed code updates later this week: MediaWiki
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
MediaWiki message delivery 19:01, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
re: Wireless Power Consortium page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_Power_Consortium)
[edit]Hello,
I need some help addressing some issues identified by "Qwerfjkl (bot)" on the above page. The old page had out of date information and I updated it with input from the organization. I used the incorrecct citation format originally but after it was flagged, I corrected the error.
However, the issue window still appears at the top of the page.
What do I have to do edit to ensure compliance.
Thank you,
KLightfoots KLightfoot2025 (talk) 03:20, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- KLightfoot2025, your edits to the article seem to have removed a large amount of useful content and added large unhelpful content in its place. I think it would be better if the article was reverted back to the older revision and then any useful information or references can be reintroduced. — Qwerfjkltalk 16:12, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- Hello,
- The old article contained a lot of incorrect and unrelated information regarding the Wireless Power Consortium and its products Qi and Ki. The new information is verified and referenced in the citations.
- Thank you, Kevin KLightfoot2025 (talk) 22:38, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
Qwerfjkl (bot) – LaMarmora1854_Explanation_regarding_incorrect_citations
[edit]Page: Russia–Turkey_relations
Diff: Special:Diff/1327297575
Comment/question: [[Three days ago, on 13 December 2025, after I finished editing the Wikipedia article "Russia-Turkey_relations", I received an alert. That alert was an automated message from Qwerfjkl (bot), in which I was briefed that my edit supposedly included one or more referencing errors, which fall under the category of "missing title error". Since my edit was quite large (I made numerous grammatical corrections, added many hyperlinks, and references, which increased the article's data size by 3,524 bytes), I was not aware of the exact change Qwerfjkl had referred to. Additionally, the bot may have made a mistake, since I always try to be extremely careful when editing articles on Wikipedia, especially when inserting citations into the articles' text. With that being said, would it be possible for any of the Wikipedia administrators with more experience and software skills, or an AI system (bot), to take a look at my edit once again, to brief me on which exact citation (if any) was added into that article in an incorrect way? I thank you in advance for your help.]]
LaMarmora1854 (talk) 13:28, 16 December 2025 (UTC) LaMarmora1854 (talk) 13:28, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- LaMarmora1854, you missed out
|title=when you added. — Qwerfjkltalk 16:00, 16 December 2025 (UTC)<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2022-003495_EN.html |access-date=2025-12-13 |website=www.europarl.europa.eu}}</ref>
"Black Gryph0n" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Black Gryph0n has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 17 § Black Gryph0n until a consensus is reached. ConeKota (talk) 15:20, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 December 2025
[edit]- Interview: Part 1: Bernadette Meehan
Say hello to the new WMF CEO.
- News and notes: We're gonna have a party!
And a new WMF CEO!
- In the media: The "bigg" bosses: Robertsky and the Pope
Pay up, big guys!
- Traffic report: Death and stranger things
And going for the FIFA prize!
- Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols
Something old and something new!
- Obituary: Michal Lewi (Iwelam) and Alan R. King (A R King)
Rest in peace.
- Concept: List of xxtreme sports (redirected from Electrojousting)
You are viewing an old revision of this page, as edited on 2065-11-10 04:33:10.
- Comix: display: flex-inline;
ampersand nb semicolon ampersand nb semicolon ampersand nb semicolon
