User talk:LevNoonan

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox/Cornerstone Ranch (Princeton, MA) (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hurricane Wind and Fire was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Hello. Most of the sources are either affiliated with the subject or do not signficantly cover the subject. Before resubmission, find more reliable sources to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:LevNoonan/sandbox/Cornerstone Ranch (Princeton, MA) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 03:12, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, LevNoonan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 03:12, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cornerstone Ranch (Princeton, MA) (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Primary sources (incl. press releases) do not establish notability per WP:NCORP. This is also written like an online brochure or business prospectus, not an encyclopaedia article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cornerstone Ranch (Princeton, MA) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:26, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Photographs

Did you download the photos from the cornerstoneranch.org website, or are you the photographer who took the photographs which were used on the cornerstoneranch.org website?   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 16:57, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

I downloaded the pictures from the website with the photographer's permission. I am reconsidering even having them on the article in the first place as I don't think they look good. Is it that I entered the information wrong when uploading them to Common? LevNoonan (talk) 03:47, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Yes, you marked that you are the source; that it's your own work. For a photograph, that means you're saying you're the photographer. It is not okay to download someone else's work to use in Wikipedia unless you go through the process to show you got permission, and credit the photographer or owner.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 05:03, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

I removed it from the article, I apologize but I did receive permission from both the owner of cornerstoneranch.org and the photographer of those photos. LevNoonan (talk) 05:05, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cornerstone Ranch (Princeton, MA) (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cornerstone Ranch (Princeton, MA) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 03:36, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cornerstone Ranch (Princeton, MA)

Hello, LevNoonan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cornerstone Ranch (Princeton, MA), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:09, 3 May 2026 (UTC)