User talk:Jrtuenge

Hello, Jrtuenge, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Sindinero (talk) 18:00, 27 July 2012 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

July 2024

Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Contronym, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your source does not show both usages. The edit notice saying "Provide a reliable source or get consensus for new entries." does not mean that you can just source one meanng. And please read WP:MINOR Meters (talk) 21:03, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello Meters. I just undid your rejection, noting that you apparently hadn't seen the Did You Know text below the definition. Jrtuenge (talk) 04:12, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

And I've undone you. Your source does nto actually list both meanings as dictionary definitions. It gives the definition in one sense and then goes on to mention that that there is some use of in the alternate sense, but, as the cited source says "This meaning ... is not yet fully established". Please discuss it on the talk page, per the edit notice. This not an exhaustive list, so we don't need more examples. Anything that is at all questionable simply should not be there. Meters (talk) 05:25, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Labor Exchange (September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Need secondary sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Labor Exchange and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 16:27, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Understood. I've revised and resubmitted accordingly. Just let me know if it's still inadequate. Jrtuenge (talk) 19:30, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Jrtuenge! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 16:27, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of file formats for luminaire radiometric data (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Monkeysmashingkeyboards was:

See WP:TECHNICAL

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of file formats for luminaire radiometric data and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 20:42, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Electric light

I removed your request to rename Electric light from Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. This request is not at all uncontroversial. If you want to move that page, you will need to start a discussion on the talk page and achieve consensus in support of the move. There has been a lot of discussion over the years on "electric light" vs "lamp" vs "light bulb" and there are reasons why the article is where it is. Note that usage varies between countries, and that technical usage differs from common usage.-- Srleffler (talk) 04:19, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

So you simply discarded all of my edits (which I had sufficiently supported with relevant citations to the International Electrotechnical Commission and Illuminating Engineering Society) and didn't bother citing anything in support of your position? Note that the edits and the proposed move are not inextricably linked. Jrtuenge (talk) 04:45, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Let's discuss further on the article's talk page. Refactoring the page to prepare for an article move without discussion is not OK. Changing an article title requires a discussion. No amount of references will justify a move by themselves. You need a consensus that the new title is the right one. If there is material in your edits that works independent of the article move, I will be happy to restore it. Nothing has been lost...--Srleffler (talk) 07:02, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Your technical move request

Hello Jrtuenge, your recent request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests has been removed because it remained inactive for seventy-two hours after being contested. If you would like to proceed with your original request, please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Controversial.

This notification was delivered by TenshiBot. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the top of your current page (your user talk page) TenshiBot (talk) 12:00, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beam angle (optical) has been accepted

Beam angle (optical), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GTrang (talk) 16:46, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Awesome -- thanks @GTrang! Jrtuenge (talk) 18:31, 14 December 2025 (UTC)