User talk:Frederatore
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply clicking the plus sign (+), "New section", or "Add topic" at the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
Why I reverted your "Warriors" edits
[edit]I feel like maybe I should give a bit more clarification on why I reverted your edits to Warriors (Lin-Manuel Miranda and Eisa Davis album), so I'm coming here:
For your first edit, I'm under the impression that whatever the original novel was inspired by is not relevant to the concept album, seeing as that's about 3 works down the "adaptation" chain (movie -> book -> original inspiration). If you think it's relevant, I'm willing to discuss that - but I don't believe it is atm.
As for the other stuff, where you put the Gamergate scandal inspiration in the lead: the story itself does not draw inspiration from the scandal afaik. Rather, it's the source for the framing device of the album being gender-swapped when compared to the movie. However, this one's a lot more open to interpretation and could very well be relevant, so I'm very open to bringing that back if you think it's notable.
Anyway, I hope this helped clarify my thought process. If you think any of your edits were justified, we can definitely discuss them!
Thanks! Sincerely, ModdedInstall2. (my edits | leave a message) 17:59, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
It's not necessary to link "city" in the first line of US city articles. Please see MOS:OL. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:54, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
Please read the guidance at WP:OVERLINK to see what should and should not be linked. You have made many, many links that are not appropriate. Thank you. signed, Willondon (talk) 15:10, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
Please stop Wikilinking objects of common knowledge like U.S. state. Thank you signed, Willondon (talk) 15:17, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
- Okay. Frederatore (talk) 15:18, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
May 2026
[edit]Because of your rapid-fire disruptive editing and page moves, I have blocked you indefinitely from editing articles or moving pages. You can still propose changes on talk pages with the {{edit request}} template.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:50, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zafar Ahmadov, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azerbaijani was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 21:30, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
May 2026
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.