User talk:.digamma
Nomination of Baron Wittard: Nemesis of Ragnarok for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baron Wittard: Nemesis of Ragnarok is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wittard: Nemesis of Ragnarok until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Coin945 (talk) 12:05, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Hellion (video game) has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sceptre (talk) 00:07, 12 October 2019 (UTC)ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for January 28
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wikispaces, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glog. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Information before reference
[edit]Hi .digamma, small note: any information found in a reference should be put before and not after it. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 04:56, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- As you said, the information added does not appear in the cited articles. Again, that's why it appears after the citation. There's no requirement for all content added to an article to include a citation. If the information is accurate it will remain in the article, if it's wrong it'll get revised or removed. Personally been playing SnowRunner for over 200 hrs, I know the information added is factual - thus I won't revise or remove their edit. Go find someone else to harass, there's nothing wrong here. .digamma (talk) 13:02, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- You know, and maybe this is news to you, WP:CIVILITY is required. You've only been here since 2005 after all. I'm not "harassing" by leaving you a small note. I misread your edit summary, I assumed you meant the information is in the references, but you just added unsourced content. Please provide a source. That you've played a game for 200 hours doesn't mean there shouldn't be a source needed. The WP:BURDEN is on you to provide a source. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 13:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- How interesting. You've discovered you misunderstood my edits: "I assumed you meant....". Seems you were confused. I will allow you to restore the edit now and your apology will be forthcoming. Thank you in advance. BTW, you should review/remove the Gameplay section of that article, there are many missing citations. .digamma (talk) 13:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- You have an extremely uncivil tone. Please provide reliable sources in the future. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 13:41, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- How interesting. You've discovered you misunderstood my edits: "I assumed you meant....". Seems you were confused. I will allow you to restore the edit now and your apology will be forthcoming. Thank you in advance. BTW, you should review/remove the Gameplay section of that article, there are many missing citations. .digamma (talk) 13:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- You know, and maybe this is news to you, WP:CIVILITY is required. You've only been here since 2005 after all. I'm not "harassing" by leaving you a small note. I misread your edit summary, I assumed you meant the information is in the references, but you just added unsourced content. Please provide a source. That you've played a game for 200 hours doesn't mean there shouldn't be a source needed. The WP:BURDEN is on you to provide a source. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 13:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 14:26, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
September 2025
[edit]
Hello, I'm Kakurokuna. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Tyler Robinson, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please familiarize yourself with WP:BLPCRIME. Kakurokuna (talk) 14:28, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
Charlie Kirk
[edit]Hello. You may be interested in some of the discussions at this talk page regarding the killing of Charlie Kirk. Specifically, the discussion of whether the name of the person in custody should be used in articles. Keep in mind that, unless someone is convicted of a crime, it may be a violation of our BLP policy to state that they have committed one. You will find more information in the WP:CTOPS section on your talk page from a few hours ago. Take care --tony 16:34, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, I appreciate your explanation, @TonySt. My interest is in merely adding a Talk entry to the disambiguation page for the named suspect, rather than modifying Charlie Kirk's article or Talk article. My talk entry doesn't imply conviction but reflects the current suspicion, at least that was my intent. I believe my Talk topic complies with the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#People accused of crime as it follows the current nature of suspicion. I believe it (let alone the disambig entry) would also comply with Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Crime victims and perpetrators. .digamma (talk) 17:14, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
- There is zero reason why you need to add a talk entry for the named suspect to the disambiguation page. Talk pages are for discussing how we changes to the page they're for, not for anything else. In other words, the only reason why there would be anything related to this would be for discussion about include a link on the actual disambiguation page. But there already is such a discussion and as sort of explained there this depends largely on whether we end up including the name in the main article. If we did it's likely there would be merit for an entry in the disambiguation page. If we don't then it's unlikely since there is no reason we'd want to link to something when what we're linking to isn't discussed in the target. Nil Einne (talk) 12:43, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, @Nil Einne:, my talk entry was about how we will be making the added entry (i.e. change) to our disambig page. My talk entry was in full context of the disambig page. "...the only reason why there would be anything related to this would be for discussion about include[ing] a link on the actual disambiguation page" - that's exactly what my deleted talk entry did.
- "There is zero reason why you need to add a talk entry for the named suspect to the disambiguation page." Apparently, many other editors have agreed with my entry and one editor made one that didn't get deleted by another editor. I was right. Discussion closed. .digamma (talk) 16:28, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
- There is zero reason why you need to add a talk entry for the named suspect to the disambiguation page. Talk pages are for discussing how we changes to the page they're for, not for anything else. In other words, the only reason why there would be anything related to this would be for discussion about include a link on the actual disambiguation page. But there already is such a discussion and as sort of explained there this depends largely on whether we end up including the name in the main article. If we did it's likely there would be merit for an entry in the disambiguation page. If we don't then it's unlikely since there is no reason we'd want to link to something when what we're linking to isn't discussed in the target. Nil Einne (talk) 12:43, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:C++ on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 19:31, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:C (programming language) on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 19:30, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Dead Internet theory on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 13:30, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Minor edits
[edit] Hello! I noticed you made a few edits in October and November and incorrectly marked them as minor. For example at Necro (disambiguation), you added a whole entry. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" means only superficial changes, like fixing typos, or changes that would never be disputed, like reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that adds content or even subtly changes the meaning of an article is not minor. If in doubt, leave the "minor" box unticked. Thank you.
— W.andrea (talk) 23:06, 15 December 2025 (UTC)