User:Valley2city/admintools
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Important quick links
[edit]
Block User § 
Email OverSight! §
Search Prefixes§
Statistics of en-wiki
Traditional Admin Dashboard
[edit]
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- ~2025-41033-93 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1353 twice in the last 5 minutes (LTA 1353, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:44, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-41033-93 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1353 twice in the last 5 minutes (LTA 1353, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:16, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-41235-88 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1307 (LTA 1307, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:06, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:34, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-41033-93 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1353 twice in the last 5 minutes (LTA 1353, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:04, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-40927-21 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Bondi Beach was changed by ~2025-40927-21 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951962 on 2025-12-16T23:34:02+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 23:34, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- FA LITTLE BRUV (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:15, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-41255-26 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1174 twice in the last 5 minutes (LTA 1174, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:24, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-41189-99 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 three times in the last 5 minutes (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:11, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- BazTS4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:33, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-41321-67 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:30, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- ~2025-41150-12 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Previously blocked account editing as a different TA. After the open proxy was blocked, they have continued their behavior on the same page on another proxy. For context see [1]. New open proxy. Different one from the one two minutes ago. PARAKANYAA (talk) 11:25, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
IP blocked. asilvering (talk) 12:57, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- Artfervour.viraj (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 11:52, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Deltaspace42, they made a draft, which was deleted, then they tried again. They edited for a total of 13 minutes. Let them learn. -- asilvering (talk) 12:52, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- Pricks Deep (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Limitedog (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- I Hate Wiki's Username Process (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Usepolicy (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Islamic Marketing (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Better-than-medina-musical-bees (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Usernamepolicy0 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- SuperUsernameSuper (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Lillyrickel (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "lyric" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:30, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Possible lyrics website spammer -- DQB (owner / report) 00:30, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy, but it's worth keeping an eye on their edits. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 05:18, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- UserLOLOLO (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "l+o+l+o+l" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 10:10, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Hank-PRMG (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) Promotional username, A google search will also show why. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2025-40921-37 (talk)
- Hexisawitch (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. – LuniZunie(talk) 15:31, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- MaeganFox (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. – LuniZunie(talk) 20:34, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- NS Marketing team (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Clear COI and promotional intent. Name also implies likely shared use. 10mmsocket (talk) 12:45, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Reason: Change of INC Leader frequently 4774அப்செ (talk) 04:01, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Editors keep ignoring hidden notes about NOT adding or changing information about the film (particularly the cast) using leaks or rumors as their source. Joy040207 (talk) 04:37, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- I was also going to file this request. There are multiple talk page discussions on how to handle this situation and material, which even extended confirmed editors are ignoring and have nearly edit warred over this leaked material. Requesting a longer timed ECP. I do not think autoconfirmed is sufficient for the high traffic this article already receives, which is only inevitably going to increase and become more problematic given the nature of this article and subject. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 04:52, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: See WP:RUSUKR. Non-extended confirmed editors fighting over control. Mellk (talk) 06:42, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – repeated unsourced changes to "notable persons" section over the past 3 months. EatingCarBatteries (contributions, talk) 07:38, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: This may refers to the Arab–Israeli conflict. ChomponU Pongsawet 08:13, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason: WP:CT/SA -- ECR violations Jay8g [V•T•E] 09:24, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- HJ Mitchell had blocked the TA but not the IP, so they just rolled a new TA. IP now blocked for two weeks. Leaving open in case someone else wants to consider PP. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 09:31, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Multiple TA edits contrary to WP:CT/SA - Arjayay (talk) 10:52, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. McPhail (talk) 11:14, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting a request for unprotection, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.
To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page's edit history and click on the "View logs for this page" link (located underneath the page's title). The protecting administrator is listed in the protection log entry, next to the words "protected", "changed protection level", or "configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" to filter the logs accordingly.
DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...
- ...you are being prevented from editing the page. A desire to change content is not a valid reason for unprotection. Instead:
- If you can edit the article's talk page, use the WP:Edit Request Wizard to propose a change on the article's talk page. Include an explanation of the exact content that you want to change, and what the content will be afterward.
- If the article's talk page is protected, you may propose a change at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit.
- ...your reasoning for reducing protection is that the article has not been vandalized. That simply means the protection is working as intended.
- ...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details.
- ...you haven't contacted the protecting administrator.
You may request a protection reduction below if...
- ...you want to change the protection level of a template or module from full protection to template protection. You may add the request to this page without having to discuss it with the protecting administrator first.
- ...you need to remove creation protection from a location where no page exists (redlinked pages) after a draft version of the intended article is prepared beforehand and ready to be published.
- ...you are proposing a trial reduction in protection for a page that has been protected for several years, provided the proposal is supported by evidence such as talk page activity, page views, page traffic, number of watchers, frequency of edit requests, and prior history of vandalism.
- ...the protecting administrator is inactive or has not responded to you in several days.
If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the request archives to see if it's been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.
Reason: The page has been semi-protected for 6 years. I believe a trial unprotection may be in order, as it seems unlikely that the page will be vandalised. Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172 (How could you tell?) 04:31, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- Did you ask the protecting admin, El C? ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 06:12, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please add an edit request to the talk page of the protected page before adding an edit request here
Requests for specific edits should be made on the talk page of the protected article. You can create an edit request below only if the talk page is also protected, preventing you from adding a request there.
- You may add the appropriate template (
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}) to the article's talk page if you would like to request an edit be made. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - For edit requests being made due to the editor having a conflict of interest with the article subject (see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used instead of the others listed above. - Requests to move pages that are currently move-protected should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not on this page.
- This page is not for holding discussions regarding content. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit that you wish to be performed.
Otherwise, this is the correct place to use in order to add an edit request if you are unable to add one to the article's talk page. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to properly add a request.
Sorry to be another peanut in the gallery here but the international response section is a real word salad. Could something like the following work?
"The attack gained international attention, and was responded to by numerous international leaders and representatives who condemned the attack. This included statements from leaders such the UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, and the United States of America President Donald Trump."
I would argue that these three countries + Israel are currently the only relevant countries to this current discussion due to long-standing geopolitical alliances, and Australia being part of the Commonwealth. Random American senators or another country’s ambassador (not to Australia) is unnecessary.
Thank you! Greyhounds Sleeping (talk) 04:27, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 3 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 11:31, 17 December 2025 (UTC) |
| 1 template-protected edit request | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 05:03, 17 December 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
Hello, I'd like to request autopatrolled rights, seeing as I've made 32 mainspace articles, none of which are stubs (I do not rate my own created pages). Thus far, I've focused on creating pages related to music, most of which pertain to WP:Albums. Thanks, Fundgy (talk) 06:10, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Track record of creating acceptable articles. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 20:38, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I was recently recommended by Aszx5000 on my talk page to apply for Autopatrolled permission. I have made about 6,700 edits and authored 88 articles and counting, which I always aim to publish at C or B class quality. I believe I have a strong understanding of relevant policy which I'm always striving to improve, and am always open to feedback and correction. Cheers! Johnson524 07:19, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
I've noticed B33tle's profilic creation of species-related pages (over 500 in the past 2 weeks), particularly beetle related pages. All of these seem excellent, and I have no doubts B33tle will do well with this permission (while also reducing the load on new page reviewers). All their contributions have been in line with the recent village pump discussion regarding their mass edits (3+ reliable sources, limiting to ~100 per day, following up with discussions on talk page), further bolstering my confidence in them. I'd also encourage them to consider Auto Wiki Browser permissions, if it would benefit them. Signed, Guessitsavis (she/they) Talk 13:24, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
I have made about 25 articles or so and I believe the articles I make are of a pretty high quality since all get reviewed at some point and have never been AfD'd. Nearly two months ago, I was recommended for this permission by an editor with the NPP permission who stated, "Since you appear trustworthy as an editor seems you may be in the running for autopatrolled rights any week/month from now."[1] I also believe granting me this permission will reduce the backlog for NPP permission holders since my pages will not appear on their backlog for them to need to review. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 17:12, 12 December 2025 (UTC) Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 17:12, 12 December 2025 (UTC) References
Hello there! I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I have read and understood WP:APCRITERIA, and have understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, inter alia, biographies of living persons, copyright, verifiability, and notability. In recent months, I have become more prolific in article creation and have been careful to ensure that my work meets content and sourcing standards. I have five successful DYK nominations, which shows my familiarity with quality requirements and review processes. Thank you. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 08:05, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
I'd like to use the tool to update South Australia place articles to use new pushpin location maps specific to regions of that vast state. I have used AWB heavily on English Wiktionary, so I'm already familiar with the tool. This, that and the other (talk) 05:46, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Requesting AWB access mainly to use JWB. I've passed the edit mark and want to help with maintenance stuff like typos and categories. Read the rules and fully understand I'm responsible for my edits. Thanks. Jībanmṛtamessage 14:50, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
I want to make mass edits on articles about populated places in Ukraine to apply a unified style for the infoboxes, and maybe perform other minor edits to Ukrainian geography articles. Dantheanimator has been extensively using AWB for the same purposes and has recommended this tool to me. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 17:01, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
I already use Twinkle for fighting vandalism, I'd like to ask for AWB to my toolset to further help fight vandalism. Felicia (talk) 18:27, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
|---|
Confirmed[edit] |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit] |
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator[edit]
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I was hoping to retain my NPR rights, which are set to expire in a few days. Destinyokhiria 💬 05:38, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
I am super active in reviewing and patrolling changes. Actively reviewing AFC now, and the reason why I apply for this access as I could help reduce the log for new pages, because many auto-confirmed articles are being created from these categories. I would focus on entertainment and India-related topics. AlphaCore talk 22:49, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights: I am in my third year as a coordinator for the military history project. Having the new page reviewer right will allow me to review and approve/decline articles for creation and new pages in this topic area in particular and help reduce the backlog in general when time permits. I have seen several new pages in military history recently that I could have reviewed and approved. I have been a Wikipedia editor for more than 15 years. I have been active in AfD, speedy deletions and PRODs in past years and some PRODS recently. I have created 134 articles, improved hundreds of other articles and have saved or helped save eight GA articles in recent years. As a coordinator, I have helped and advised several new users in improving and writing articles for the project and on requirements for higher assessments. I was very active in vandalism patrol for several years. I have a clean block record except for a 49-second mistaken block which the administrator immediately reversed after realizing that I was the user reporting the vandalism and not the vandal. Donner60 (talk) 05:36, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
I'm quite interested at trying my hand at reviewing articles in the backlog, and have a reasonably good track record of (a lot of) copyediting, expanding stubs, and (more recently) countering vandalism. I've spent quite a bit of time reviewing various WP policies and guidelines, as well as the MOS, and try to abide by them and act in good faith as often as possible. I have a firm understanding of the principles around notability and sourcing in particular, having created a few articles myself from scratch. Blaithnaid (talk) 21:40, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
I am active user in reviewing and patrolling changes. I could help reduce the log for new pages. I am reviewer on Russian wiki. Lado85 (talk) 13:50, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights I would like to request new page reviewer rights to help patrol new articles and ensure they meet Wikipedia’s standards. -- Vodnir (talk) 22:30, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I am an active editor familiar with New Pages Patrolling and the relevant policies, including WP:NPP, WP:GNG, WP:BLP, and WP:RS. I regularly assess drafts and new pages for notability, sourcing, and promotional or problematic content. With the current backlog of unreviewed new pages, I believe I can help reduce the load by carrying out careful, policy based reviews. Thank you for your consideration. Pizza on Pineapple (Let's eat🍕) 11:02, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
Hi, I'm a trial NPP and AFC reviewer and doing new page patrol requires moving some articles to draft for better improvements as they're not suitable in the main space, it will be more better if I can move articles without leaving redirects. This right would also be helpful for when I close RMs so that I don't need to request the move be performed at WP:RM/TR afterwards, as well as potentially helping out with moves there myself. Destinyokhiria 💬 21:59, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request page mover rights. I have experience with page moves and understand naming conventions. I have recently got blocked due to the use of A.I., but I have promised myself not to use it anymore.Vinizex94🌍 05:12, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
I am experienced user. I have experience with page moves and understand naming conventions. Lado85 (talk) 13:54, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I am active user in reviewing and patrolling changes. I could help reduce the log for pending changes. I am reviewer on Russian wiki. Lado85 (talk) 13:52, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I would like to help review pending changes to maintain accuracy and neutrality in articles. Vodnir (talk) 23:23, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request the Pending Changes Reviewer permission. I am an extended confirmed user with over 550 edits, mainly focused on biographies, Indian politics, legislation, and sourcing from reliable secondary sources. I regularly work on semi-protected and sensitive articles and would like to help review pending edits to reduce backlog and ensure compliance with Wikipedia’s policies on neutrality, verifiability, and biographies of living persons. I am familiar with core content policies such as WP:NPOV, WP:V, WP:BLP, and WP:RS, and I will use this permission carefully and only for clearly constructive edits. دثلميح (talk) 04:06, 17 December 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
Reason for requesting rollback rights Very high frequency (talk) 20:10, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights: I would like rollback rights to help quickly revert vandalism and keep articles clean. -- Vodnir (talk) 23:26, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights Very high frequency (talk) 00:35, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor[edit]
I'm requesting template editor rights so that I can make changes to certain templates such as
|
| Requests for temporary account IP viewer |
|---|
Temporary account IP viewer[edit]
I edit in AMPOL spaces where temporary accounts are common and establishing a lineage of users is useful, such as the multiple accounts at Emil Bove that are likely the same person. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 16:53, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
Hello! It seems my account is finally six months old (judging by the fact I've gained access to WP:TWL a few minutes ago.) I regularly combat abuse from unregistered users, and I have some experience with reporting sockpuppets at WP:SPI. TAIV access would allow me to better monitor LOUTSOCKing and detect problematic behaviors such as vote-stacking. Note: I have been blocked twice, once indefinitely, so it may be best to review those before granting. Thanks, Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 22:43, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
I have done plenty of AIV and NPP work in the past; given how temporary accounts have reshaped how IPs work, what with editing and talk page history/warnings now disconnected, I'll find being able to view IPs useful in order to identify longer-term abuse or intractable cases of vandalism/NOTHERE. Iseult Δx talk to me 02:11, 15 December 2025 (UTC) Iseult Δx talk to me 02:11, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
I am a NPP and do an amount of countervandalism work. For completeness, I have this access via my Steward rights. However, my preference is for access that I intend to use for a "local" purpose to be approved and granted locally rather than relying on my global access. That is, at the moment I would only use the Steward access to view an underlying IP here if it was related to a global Steward thing. MarcGarver (talk) 13:30, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
Hello Wikipedians! I have been editing here for over a year, with around 2,200 edits. I focus on articles related to Irish literature, Irish writers, Irish colleges, and Anglo-Irish figures. It's a specialized area, but it's important as well. I have gone through the permission criteria, and meet requirements 1-4 comfortably. The 5th one, regarding a need for the permission, I have been reverting vandalism on several pages, and can help in keeping the pages on Ireland and Anglo-Irish subjects vandalism-free. If granted the permission, I will only use it to fight vandalism, and with full accountability. SeanBeans1981 (talk) 12:36, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
I am an editor with just under 13,000 edits and have been editing for just under 3 years now. I regular take part in countervandalism related activities and occasionally activities related to LTA and sockpuppetry. I believe that this tool will help me identify patterns of vandalism and LTA between different temporary accounts. TLJ7863 (talk) 00:56, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Returning to editing after some time away and I see that this permission is now required to view IP addresses. I tend to work in counter-vandalism, including making reports at AIV. This access would help me respond to vandalism from anonymous accounts. I understand and agree to the guidelines for using this permission. — Longchess (talk) 02:07, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Hi there! I am requesting Temporary Account IP viewer rights as I often patrol for vandalism and I think that this permission would be helpful with the introduction of the temporary accounts. Thanks, Destinyokhiria 💬 06:49, 17 December 2025 (UTC) |
AfD dates
[edit]- 17 December (Wednesday)
- 16 December (Tuesday)
- 15 December (Monday)
- 14 December (Sunday)
- 13 December (Saturday)
- 12 December (Friday)
- 11 December (Thursday)
- 10 December (Wednesday)