User:ChonokisFigueroa

You can disagree or debate amongst yourselves about Talk Page topics left by this account but it changes nothing. They are factual highlights of the tone and bias upheld in certain categories of Wikipedia entries. They provide context and insight for the reader.

As for the the patterns:

Critiques are regularly framed as Invalid if they learn away from the bias.

-- To minimize opposition/critiques

Appeal to authority, cherry-picking to support a particular viewpoint, for the purpose of creating a misleading impression of consensus. Which skews and undermines actual NPOV.

-- In that, left-leaning and/or establishment views are simply “the facts” and by default are considered NPOV. All because what is “neutral” is shifted to align with the dominant editorial culture.

Then there's the shift to procedure, sometimes with snark, as a means to avoid substantive critique.

All in all, these are common tactics, wherein editors dishonestly use policy language and rhetorical framing to support their preferred, biased versions of Wikipedia entries.