This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
Comment: Thank you for the excellent feedback. I have replaced all "search results" citations with links to specific, in-depth, and significant third-party media appearances by Tom's Guide staffers (previously, I linked to a search results page on those third-party media websites). I have also added several links to significant third-party publications, such as Adweek and Digiday, to provide a richer, more substantive experience for readers to make a stronger case for SIGCOV and secondary guidelines. I have also updated third-party data around audience numbers from Semrush.com. Other additions: I have added a "criticism" subheading under the editorial section; I have contextualized article output to show increases in five-year increments; I have pulled and archived Semrush.com data to show site traffic growth and declines. Gatewaycomputerfan (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Lots of sources are "search results," or primary sources that do not count towards notability. In general, most of them seem to be passing mentions. Please see if you can find few but higher quality sources if possible. WeWake (talk) 04:23, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I have added third-party stories that I hope pass the SIGCOV standard. Included is a mention of a Webby Award for the publication, a Digiday story about the publication's parent company, of which the publication is listed as a leader, a Niche Pursuits profile about the publication, and a link to its OpenCritic hub. Thank you for your excellent feedback this entry draft. Gatewaycomputerfan (talk) 03:18, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Note to AFC Reviewers: This draft is for a title that was previously an article, but was then cut down to a redirect. If this draft is accepted, the history should be preserved. Do not tag the redirect for G6. If you find that this draft should be accepted, and do not have the Page Mover privilege, please request assistance in moving the redirect to preserve the history. Reviewers should check the history and verify whether there was a consensus to cut the article down to a redirect, or whether the action was taken boldly without discussion. If there was a consensus for the cutdown, do not accept this draft without verifying that the draft improves the article or that consensus has changed. If in doubt, please discuss. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:28, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=icon}
Comment: Thank you for the excellent feedback. I have replaced all "search results" citations with links to specific, in-depth, and significant third-party media appearances by Tom's Guide staffers (previously, I linked to a search results page on those third-party media websites). I have also added several links to significant third-party publications, such as Adweek and Digiday, to provide a richer, more substantive experience for readers to make a stronger case for SIGCOV and secondary guidelines. I have also updated third-party data around audience numbers from Semrush.com. Other additions: I have added a "criticism" subheading under the editorial section; I have contextualized article output to show increases in five-year increments; I have pulled and archived Semrush.com data to show site traffic growth and declines. Gatewaycomputerfan (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2025 (UTC)