Talk:Mrunal Thakur

This article was nominated for deletion on November 26 2012. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Private life

Is missing some info. Isn't she married already in 2017? 2A02:8388:1602:A780:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 20:41, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

R

Joy Mathengwane (talk) 18:02, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

हिन्दी में

In English

As of August 2022, reports are rife on the internet that Mrunal Thakur is now in a serious relationship with her Kumkum Bhagya's co-star, Arjit Taneja. Chetan Sharma1 (talk) 10:12, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Mrunal Thakur promote sita ramam in 2022.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Mrunal photoshoot 2025.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:06, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Changes after reverts discussion

@Mark Stevens WikiEdit

Firstly agree with consistency of usage of commercial success and failure unless specifically mentioned in a WP:ICTF source with a specific terminology. Secondly Agree that award mention is redundant in intro para. No issue with reducing content about Kalki 2898 AD.

About my edits:

1. The part about Super 30 and Batla House being commercial successes is important in the first paragraph since talk is about string of commercial failures afterwards. It has been there in the wiki page for a long time. Not my edit. So I reverted.

2. I added entry for SIIMA award for Hi Nanna in the film description. It has not been mentioned in text previously in the article as specifically for the film

3. Hi Nanna was a superhit at the box office. Specifically mentioned so in both OTTPlay (WP: ICTF approved) and T2Blive (which has share and collection). Pointing it as the only commercial success of the year can sound judgmental and not necessarily neutral per WP: NPOV.

4. Family Star received mixed to negative reviews from critics . This is a new change from my end in this edit. Please see topic "Summary of reviews - Changing from generally negative -> mixed to negative" in Talk page of Family Star. Talk:The Family Star

5. Son of Sardaar 2 received mixed reviews from crticis. Please see topic "Fresh: Changing critics reception summary to "mixed" based on new WP: ICTF reviews added" in Talk page of Son of Sardaar 2. Talk:Son of Sardaar 2

6. Added back appraisal of Thakur performance in Son of Sardaar 2. I don't see a reason that this should be deleted.

Computeracct (talk) 19:30, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]