Talk:Lockheed Martin

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lockheed Martin article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 3 months

This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Maryland Mid‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

why is the logo so small

in the article this might just be for me but the logo is tiny Jatanea (talk) 23:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was vandalism. Fixed. Schierbecker (talk) 23:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carbon Footprint Question

Is there a reason why 'Carbon footprint' has it's own top level section? I have not seen this on any other corporation wiki's. On others (ex. Google) it's a subsection as part of a larger discussion of internal affairs. Purplecarpark (talk) 20:40, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I concur, I came here just to post this. It's just data, it's not even presented in context with other corporate footprints or reactions from third parties. The only source is Lockheed Martin's own report, so I wouldn't even say it's notable. I'm going to remove it since it doesn't add anything for the average reader. If anyone objects, feel free to respond below. Equirax (talk) 00:07, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advanced technology center

There appears to be no mention about the previously stated technology center, which is headquartered in Palo Alto and has multiplce facilities around the country. Here is the link to its homepage(apologies idk how to cite a page)https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/capabilities/space/atc.html, I'm not entirely sure how similar this is to the ATL division but I thought it was a good idea to just bring it up. Another random person 42 (talk) 08:29, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: NAS 348 Global Climate Change

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2025 and 23 April 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LunaMichelle03 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by TradingRoom54 (talk) 17:01, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

undefined named references "NYT" and "Shadow"

@OmniFrieza994: In the revision of 12:10, 19 March 2025, there are "ref" tags added which refer to "NYT" and "shadow", but references using these tags were not added or previously defined. Fabrickator (talk) 21:53, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Readability of the second paragraph

The second paragraph should probably be simplified or moved to table, as the amount of links is almost unreadable. Xianyu20 (talk) 15:39, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]