Talk:Everything Everywhere All at Once

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Everything Everywhere All at Once article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 12 months

Film: Chinese / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Chinese cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Martial arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China: Entertainment Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Chinese-language entertainment taskforce (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Cinema / Asian Americans Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Asian Americans.

Asian Americans Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asian Americans, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asian Americans on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Asian AmericansWikipedia:WikiProject Asian AmericansTemplate:WikiProject Asian AmericansAsian Americans
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2023, when it received 11,115,623 views.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 6 times. The weeks in which this happened:

"So, even though you have broken my heart yet again, I wanted to say, in another life, I would have really liked just doing laundry and taxes with you." listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect So, even though you have broken my heart yet again, I wanted to say, in another life, I would have really liked just doing laundry and taxes with you. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 21 § So, even though you have broken my heart yet again, I wanted to say, in another life, I would have really liked just doing laundry and taxes with you. until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:13, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Miscounted Academy Awards

From section "Accolades":

[T]he first science-fiction film to win five of the top six Academy Awards.

That's all kind of messy.

The link goes to List of Big Five Academy Award winners and nominees, not six.
Apparently the sixth in the "above-the-line" group would be supporting actor..... which would make it seven, not six (film, direction, screenplay, 2x best lead, 2x best support).
EEAAO actually won six of these, not five (film, direction, screenplay, actress, both supports).

There is no source, so it sounds pretty ORish to me. I also have my doubts that highly specific records of any sort are notable.

So, is there a source not only for the trivial facts (number and type of awards), but for the contradicting numbers and the terms used? What makes this notable? --91.5.99.247 (talk) 23:44, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Asian and Asian American Women Film and Podcast

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 May 2025 and 7 July 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Stephaniechan5 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Wrong05 (talk) 09:49, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Often best"

There's a long-running edit war where a sockmaster keeps showing up and removing It is often regarded as one of the best films of the 2020s and the 21st century. from the lede, which is typically promptly reverted. However, I don't actually see strong support for that statement in the article. Can we discuss it and get consensus, and maybe that will settle things down? Thanks. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:17, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say it's a rephrase of the fact that it has received a record number of accolades - and whilte that fact is in fact a fact, and widely repoted, the "often best" thing is rather a novel synthesis - and probably wrong, too. (Many people must consider it a very good film, hence the accolades, but how many actually consider it "(one of) the best", across a 5 or 25 year period? Nø (talk) 21:01, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]