Jump to content

Talk:Cultural Revolution

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeCultural Revolution was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 21, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
April 5, 2019Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 25, 2007, May 16, 2008, May 16, 2011, May 16, 2013, May 16, 2014, and May 16, 2016.
Current status: Former good article nominee

Abbreviation of Cultural Revolution as CR

[edit]

Is there a reason why Cultural Revolution is abbreviated as CR? It seems to have been a unilateral decision made by @Lfstevens in late 2023, and doesn't really make sense as it is (thankfully) not applied uniformly on all instances. If there isn't any opposition to it, I will revert all of them to Cultural Revolution or the Cultural Revolution. I think there is an argument to be made of keeping the long form of CRG "Cultural Revolution Group" as well. Artwhitemaster (talk) 09:02, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These should be reverted. I agree with you. JArthur1984 (talk) 12:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm ok with switching them back, but I don't think it benefits the reader to do so. Shortcuts are a good thing. If inconsistency is the only critique, I'm happy to convert the rest of the references. Lfstevens (talk) 19:17, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've seen a bit of attestation of the initialism in sources—which makes sense, because it's a proper name that is both pretty long and will be stated over and over. I would be okay with establishing its use in sources, and using it a bit. Going to be awkward either way, though. Remsense 19:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No. This is an encyclopaedia, not a casual western-style article. Spell it out properly. 2400:1A00:B040:E1BB:4802:B25B:C7CD:5ED (talk) 14:50, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What.

[edit]

@Remsense What do you want me to do? Ping me. Alexysun (talk) 00:29, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

3 minute response time insta-revert is crazy. Alexysun (talk) 00:33, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Gatekeeping knowledge is crazy 💔 Alexysun (talk) 00:35, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not Remsense, but the content you added is already described in the lead or Background section in more detail. In the lead, it already says:
"Tens of millions were persecuted, including senior officials such as Liu Shaoqi, Deng Xiaoping and Peng Dehuai; millions were persecuted for being members of the Five Black Categories, with intellectuals and scientists labelled as the Stinking Old Ninth."
In my opinion (based on MOS:LEAD), the added bit about Mao's semi-retirement and the context of the Great Leap Forward is better suited for the Background section rather than the article's first paragraph, as the article would otherwise begin off focus. The lead at present is already quite long. Yue🌙 04:46, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with this length concern. Each point was already addressed in the lead at a higher level of detail. The other troublesome aspect was the POV-style "in reality ..." JArthur1984 (talk) 12:26, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:24, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:54, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]