Jump to content

Talk:Clive Palmer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Palmerbet's history and court-cases it's been in, should have a section in the main page.

[edit]

Needless to have to say, a politician with influence in a betting-agency WHEN betting on elections is something that-that betting-agency allows, has active, betting-markets in, could partly-affect the odds-of a particular result, election-by-election, year-by-year, in the wider averages of-those-odds, and so in effect 'ATTRACT' people to a RESULT, in that election - i.e. when possible (deliberate) odds-manipulation could in-directly incentivize people to vote in a particular way, in order to increase their chances of winning a bet, as unlikely as that might sound.

That risk was recognized instantly, before scrutiny-into the company and things like how-transparent it's decision-making COULD-be, even if transparency was successfully-forced when it came to things like 1, appointments, or 2 their rationale as-to whether or not to allow betting on politics when they at-least might earn a reputation as being suspicious because of the potential for a conflict of interest.

The potential risk of that agency being able to affect election results remained, ( so it had been reasonable for them to-NOT allow specifically, betting on politics while still operating on all other betting-markets - a minor-sacrifice for integrity, in other words ) ... and he claimed a kind of freedom of businessman 'defiance', in claiming that the one he set up, should-not, have-to-not, have markets, supposedly losing a competitive-edge ... on politics specifically.

Remove "former" from politician

[edit]

He is back (for the 4th time after saying he's "going to deregister and retire from politics" the uap is absolutely dead however. 49.3.7.67 (talk) 11:53, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

National Living Treasure

[edit]

If NLT is notable then the means by which he obtained it is notable, since it is certainly unusual for an employer to instruct his employees to vote for him. If the latter is not notable then NLT itself is not notable. Greglocock (talk) 00:58, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]