Jump to content

Printing press

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Printing press
Wooden printing press with large screw mechanism in a museum setting
A recreated Gutenberg press at the International Printing Museum in Carson, California
ClassificationMachine
ApplicationPrinting
InventorJohannes Gutenberg
Inventedc.1440

A printing press is a machine that applies pressure to transfer ink onto a surface made of paper, cloth, or a similar material. It marked a significant improvement on earlier methods, in which the paper was rubbed by hand to transfer applied ink to the printing surface. The printing press was invented by the German goldsmith Johannes Gutenberg around 1440, and its subsequent global spread revolutionized literary production and communication during the early modern period.

The spread of printing brought about a transformative era of mass communication to European society, allowing information to quickly spread across Europe and contributing to the Reformation and the Scientific Revolution. The cost of printed texts declined and their availability increased, facilitating higher adult literacy rates across Europe. Books increasingly appeared in vernacular languages rather than Latin, and national languages were standardized.

The basic design of the wooden handpress was largely consistent for over three centuries, until the Industrial Revolution. By 1800 Lord Stanhope had built a new iron printing press printing a sheet at one pull. In 1814, The Times adopted Friedrich Koenig's new presses, which incorporated steam power and rotary motion. Richard M. Hoe's rotary printing press, introduced in 1843, enabled much higher output; later rotary presses could produce millions of page impressions in a day. During the twentieth century, the letterpress was largely replaced by offset printing, phototypesetting, and digital printing in commercial work.

Those who work in printing presses are known as printing press operators.[1]

History

[edit]
Medieval manuscript illustration of a lecturer addressing rows of students in a vaulted hall
A medieval university class, 1350s

Johannes Gutenberg invented the movable-type printing press around 1440, utilizing four existing technologies: the screw press, movable type, the codex book format, and mechanized paper production.[2][3] The economic and cultural changes of late medieval Europe brought about viable commercial conditions for his press. The urban middle class grew alongside trade and commerce, while the growing number of universities since the twelfth century had increased demand for books. Hand-copying was slow and expensive, and by the fifteenth century, the supply of manuscripts was much less than the demand.[5]

Technological factors

[edit]
Large wooden screw press with vertical timbers and central screw
Early modern wine press. Such screw presses, used in Europe for a wide range of uses, provided Gutenberg with the model for his printing press.

Gutenberg integrated these four technologies into a single working system and added a number of innovations of his own, including a hand mold for casting type and an oil-based ink suited to metal type.[3]

The first factor, the screw press, permitted direct pressure to be applied on a flat plane. Used for a variety of tasks[6] and introduced by the Romans in the 1st century AD, it was often used by farmers for pressing grapes to make wine and olives to make oil.[7] Gutenberg may also have been inspired by the paper presses which operated similarly to the screw press and were used across the German lands from the late 14th century.[8] He adopted the basic design of the screw press, thereby mechanizing the printing process.[9] Printing brought the machine different demands, and Gutenberg adapted the construction so that the platen (a flat surface) exerted even pressure across the paper with minimal smearing. Gutenberg introduced a movable undertable with a level surface on which the sheets could be swiftly changed.[10]

Rows of small metal letter blocks arranged in a wooden compartmented case
Movable type sorted in a letter case and loaded in a composing stick on top
Open book showing two columns of dense black printed text on a cream page
A paper codex of the 42-line Bible, Gutenberg's major work

Movable type is the typographical principle of writing a text from individual reusable characters. The Chinese artisan Bi Sheng invented the first movable type in the 11th century during the Song dynasty, using characters made of baked clay.[11] Around 1300, Wang Zhen developed a set of movable wooden type, arranged on revolving tables, which he used to print a local gazetteer. Wang wrote about his invention in his agricultural treatise.[11] Woodblock printing remained the primary method in East Asia. The oldest surviving book incorporating metal movable type is the Jikji dating to 1377, produced under the Korean state of Goryeo.[11] However, none of the various East Asian methods gained widespread usage, largely due to their relative inefficiency. The logographic script used in China included thousands of distinct characters, resulting in high production costs for a full set of type.[11] The Gutenberg press benefited from its use of the Latin alphabet with a relatively small set of characters.[12]

The codex book format also dated to the Roman Empire,[13] and was of utmost significance in the history of the book. By 500 AD, Christian and Muslim scribes had shifted from using scrolls to using codices.[14] The codex proved more convenient than the scroll format because of its greater legibility, compact arrangement, lower costs, and the availability of both left and right pages.[15]

Medieval papermakers had successfully mechanized the production of paper. Water-powered paper mills were in usage by 1282,[16] resulting in much greater production and replacing the tedious processes associated with Chinese[17] and Muslim papermaking.[18] The number of papermaking centers grew rapidly in late 13th-century Italy, causing paper to become much cheaper than parchment. These centers became more common in Germany a century later.[19]

However, the increased usage of paper was just as dependent on the rise of movable-type printing.[20] Codices of parchment are superior in quality to any other writing material,[21] and Gutenberg still made great use of them in his edition of the 42-line Bible.[22] After much experimentation, he concluded that the formula for an oil-based ink worked best for printing with metal type.[23]

Gutenberg's press

[edit]
Drawing of Johannes Gutenberg standing beside a printing press, holding a printed sheet
Johannes Gutenberg, 1904 reconstruction

Gutenberg began working on the printing press around 1436, when he partnered with the gemcutter Andreas Dritzehn and the paper miller Andreas Heilmann.[24] The first known mention of Gutenberg's work is in a 1439 lawsuit against him which describes his types, type molds, and collection of metals.[24] Gutenberg had formerly worked as a professional goldsmith, and had obtained knowledge of metals from that craft. He was the first to produce type from an alloy of lead, tin, and antimony. This alloy produced a particularly durable type suitable for high-quality printing. To create these lead types, Gutenberg used a special matrix that allowed him to rapidly and precisely mold new type blocks from a uniform template.[24] His type case is estimated to have contained 290 separate letter boxes including special characters, ligatures, and punctuation marks.[25]

Gutenberg is also credited with introducing an oil-based ink, which was more durable than the previously used water-based inks. He used both paper and vellum (high-quality parchment) in his printing. He created a trial of color printing for a few of the page headings in the Gutenberg Bible, present only in some copies.[26] The Mainz Psalter of 1453, likely designed by Gutenberg, featured elaborate red and blue printed initials and was published by his successors Johann Fust and Peter Schöffer.[27]

Operation

[edit]
Technical engraving showing the side view of a printing press with its screw, platen, and frame
Printing press, engraving by W Lowry after John Farey Jr., 1819
Woodcut showing two printers at work: one removes a printed sheet while the other inks type with leather balls
This woodcut from 1568 shows the printer on the left removing a printed sheet while the printer on the right inks the type. Working together, they could perform 14,000 hand movements and produce c.3,600 impressions in a working day.[28]

A classical printing press is a stationary machine about 5 to 7 feet (1.5 to 2.1 m) long, 3 feet (0.91 m) wide, and 7 feet (2.1 m) tall.[29] A compositor set the type, the small individual metal letters, into the desired lines of text. Several lines were arranged at once and inserted into a wooden frame, the galley. Once the correct number of pages was composed, the galleys were laid face up in another frame called a forme, which rested on a flat stone, the bed.[30]

The type was inked using two pads of leather called ink balls and mounted on wooden handles. The ink balls were stuffed with wool or horsehair, and the leather was usually sheepskin, but sometimes also calfskin and dogskin. The compositor pressed the ink balls together to distribute the ink evenly, and then applied the balls to the type. A sheet of dampened paper was held together by various small pins and two thin frames, the tympan and the frisket. The paper was placed on the tympan, and the frisket, which contained cut-out openings matching the type, was folded over the sheet to protect the margins from ink.[30]

The tympan and frisket were then folded down so that the paper rested on the inked type. The rounce (a small handle) and the windlass (a winch) were used to wind the bed under the platen. The compositor pulled a long lever, the bar, which drove a screw that pressed the platen onto the paper, and the elastic nature of the machine caused the bar to spring back after each pull. The rounce was then rotated in the opposite direction to move the bed away from the platen, the tympan and frisket were lifted, and the printed sheet was removed.[30] Human hand worked the entire process until the development in the early 19th century of iron presses, some of which could be operated by steam power.[31]

Mass production and spread in Europe

[edit]
Map of Europe with dots marking cities where printing presses were established by the end of the fifteenth century
The spread of printing in the 15th century from Mainz, Germany
Line graph showing European printed book output rising from near zero around 1450 to approximately one billion by 1800
European book output rose from a few million to around one billion copies within a span of less than four centuries[32]

Gutenberg's mechanical movable-type printing press, alongside consumer demand for printed copies of Bibles and other religious works, precipitated the widespread growth of the printing industry across Europe.[33] Gutenberg's print shop in Mainz was originally the only one in Europe, but by the end of the 15th century around 270 European cities were involved in printing.[34] As early as 1480, there were printers active in 110 different places in Germany, Italy, France, Spain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland, England, Bohemia and Poland.[35] The historians Lucien Febvre and Henri-Jean Martin conclude that by this date, the printed book was used throughout Europe.[36]

In Italy, a center of early printing, print shops existed in 77 cities and towns by 1500, while 151 locations in Italy had hosted printing at some point by 1600. In 1600, nearly 3,000 printers are known to have been active in Italy. However, printing centers soon emerged, and one third of the Italian printers published in Venice.[37]

By 1500, printing presses throughout Western Europe had produced over 20 million copies.[38] Their output grew to an estimated 150–200 million copies by 1600.[38] European printing presses c.1600 could produce between 1,500[39] and 3,600 impressions per workday.[28] By comparison, with manual woodblock printing,[40] a skilled printer could print 1,500 to 2,000 double sheets per day. A printing block could be used for up to 25,000 prints with repairs.[41] The Korean Kabin font metal movable type developed in 1434 could print 40 sheets per day.[42] At least 750,000 copies of Erasmus's works were sold during his lifetime (1469–1536),[43] while Martin Luther became Europe's most published author c.1520, at the start of the Reformation. Printers across Germany reprinted 291 editions of Luther's 45 original works, and between 1518 and 1520 they distributed 300,000 printed copies of his works, with the widespread printing surprising both the pope and secular rulers.[44][45]

Newspapers arose due to faster typographical production and falling costs (see Relation), and provided a new means of conveying current information to the public.[46] The historian Andrew Pettegree argues that the Reformation directly contributed to the market for printed news. Printers who had gained readers from Luther's pamphlets kept them by producing news sheets discussing current events. These news pamphlets closely resembled the Reformation Flugschriften (printed pamphlets) in format, typically running to four or eight pages in quarto. In the early seventeenth century, a German publisher issued news bulletins on a regular schedule, creating the first weekly newspaper, and after the format spread it remained the principal news medium in northern Europe for over a century.[47] Many libraries in Europe and North America contain works printed before 1501, known as incunabula.[34][48]

Global spread

[edit]

The printing press spread rapidly across Europe largely because the equipment was portable, making censorship efforts difficult. When religious or government entities attempted to curtail the technology in one city, the printers would relocate to neighboring cities, further accelerating the press's spread across Europe.[49] Colonial and missionary networks spread the European-style printing press even farther, as Jesuit missionaries established a press at Goa in 1556 with João de Bustamante as its first printer.[50][51] The Portuguese Jesuit Diogo de Mesquita acquired a press during a visit to Europe in 1586 and maintained it at Nagasaki, producing religious works in Japanese until his death in 1614.[52] The Dominicans set up the first press in the Philippines, publishing the Doctrina Christiana.[53] In the Ottoman Empire, Sephardi Jews quickly established a Hebrew press in Constantinople in 1493, an Armenian press was established in 1567, and a Greek press in 1627, but İbrahim Müteferrika established the first Arabic-script press for a Muslim readership in 1727. Esad of Ioannina assisted Müteferrika in the development of his press, which produced seventeen works before 1742.[54] In the Americas, Juan Pablos established the first press in Mexico City in 1539, working on behalf of the Seville-based publisher Juan Cromberger, while British colonists established another press at Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 1638.[55]

Industrial printing presses

[edit]

The overall design of the wooden handpress was largely consistent throughout its long history, but its construction and performance improved considerably over three centuries, with metal screws replacing wooden ones c.1550 and the tympan and frisket becoming standard fittings.[56] Around 1620, the Dutch cartographer Willem Blaeu introduced a press with a more advanced hose arrangement and a more reliable mechanism for moving the type form into position beneath the platen,[57] and printers introduced further changes over the next two centuries. As new metal components were introduced, the straight lever bar was curved to facilitate its movement, and screw dimensions were adjusted to suit particular press sizes. By the closing years of the wooden-press era, the Ramage press enhanced the speed of printing by incorporating a mechanism that returned the platen automatically after each impression.[58] According to one estimate, these improvements raised press productivity by a factor of three or four between the mid-15th and late-16th centuries.[57]

Several more innovations and improvements followed before the start of the Industrial Revolution. By 1800, Lord Stanhope had built the first iron printing press, which maintained the screw of the wooden hand press but increased the pressure from a single pull through a new arrangement of bar and spindle. To allow greater force on the frame, Stanhope cast the structure in iron.[59] The Stanhope press could print a whole sheet in one pull, its chief advantage over the wooden press, and did so with far less effort on the lever.[60] It could print 480 pages per hour, double the output of the old press.[61]

The use of steam power for running the machinery and the rotary motion of cylinders also drastically altered the design of the printing press, and the German printer Friedrich Koenig successfully introduced both elements in his press designs developed between 1802 and 1818.[62] Koenig moved to London in 1806, where the printers Thomas Bensley, George Woodfall, and Richard Taylor financed his experiments.[63] In 1810, Koenig patented a press in 1810 that operated on both a steam engine and the old platen. A machine made to this design entered operation in Bensley's office in April 1811, with the engineer Andreas Friedrich Bauer assisting.[63] He patented his first cylinder machine in October 1811.[64][clarification needed] John Walter of The Times ordered two steam-driven double machines built under Koenig's patent of 1813, with The Times printing 1,100 sheets an hour on them from 29 November 1814.[65] A further patent of 1814 covered a perfecting machine that printed both sides of a sheet in one operation; the first example was completed in 1816.[66]

Rotary press

[edit]

In the United States, Richard M. Hoe invented the steam-powered rotary printing press in 1843,[67] which could produce millions of copies of a page in a single day. The transition to rolled paper, with continuous feed, greatly increased the rate of the presses. Hoe's original design produced up to 8,000 pages per, with 2,000 revolutions per hour each printing four page images.[68] By 1891, The New York World and the Philadelphia Item were operating presses that produced either 90,000 four-page sheets per hour or 48,000 eight-page sheets.[69]

In the mid-19th century, a separate class of jobbing presses emerged for small-format commercial work such as cards, billheads, and leaflets. Stephen P. Ruggles pioneered the platen jobber in Boston from the 1830s, and George Phineas Gordon refined it. Gordon's Franklin press was so influential that by 1894 at least eleven firms were manufacturing Gordon-type presses, and James Moran estimates that between 1840 and 1940, no fewer than 123 different kinds of treadle-driven jobbers were made in the United States alone. The quick pace of the platen jobber made it a significant force in reshaping the printing trade during the 19th century.[70]

Machine composition

[edit]

Type continued to be set by hand long after the press itself had been mechanized. Two hot-metal systems automated composition toward the end of the nineteenth century. Ottmar Mergenthaler's Linotype operated on a keyboard and assembled matrices to cast a whole line of type at once, and it became widely used, while Tolbert Lanston's 1887 Monotype cast single characters from hot metal. As most text was now machine set, hand-set foundry type went into decline, and machine composition remained standard until phototypesetting and digital methods displaced it in the later 20th century.[71]

Later developments

[edit]

During the 20th century, printing technology moved beyond the letterpress principle. Offset printing, developed in the early 1900s, transfers an image from a plate to a rubber blanket and then to paper, and its speed and high quality made it the dominant commercial printing method by mid-century.[72] The introduction of phototypesetting in the 1960s and 1970s replaced hot-metal type composition with photographic methods, and the spread of desktop publishing software from the mid-1980s shifted much of the typesetting process to personal computers.[73] By the early 21st century, digital printing had made short-run and on-demand production commercially viable, while offset remained the standard for high-volume work.[74]

Impact

[edit]

The wide circulation of information and ideas due to the printing press has been called the "printing revolution", and the historian Elizabeth Eisenstein described the press as an "agent of change" across various societies. After its invention, books were produced and sold in greater numbers, authors were more closely associated with their works, reading became a more individualistic affair, and Latin declined as a scholarly language.[75] In 1997, Time Life selected Gutenberg's invention of the printing press as the most important event of the second millennium.[76]

Authorship and reading

[edit]

The printing press resulted in a greater association between authors and their texts, and the production of identical copies allowed for the precise citation of references precisely and attached greater importance to individual authors and their exact words. For many works produced before the printing press, the name of the author has been entirely lost.[77] The consistency of the printed page gave authors new encouragement to number pages and include tables of contents and indices in their books.[78]

Reading habits also shifted, due to the lower cost and wider availability of printed texts compared to manuscripts. Individuals shifted away from communal oral recitation toward silent and private reading, marking what Eisenstein describes as a transition "from a hearing public to a reading public".[79] A sermon or speech had required listeners to gather in one place at one time, whereas people scattered across a continent could read a printed text. The reading public was therefore highly individualistic, and its members often did not know each other.[80] After the printing press was invented, wider availability of texts contributed to increasing adult literacy rates across Europe in the next two centuries, although the growth of literacy differed regionally.[81]

By the end of the fifteenth century, editions of the major classical authors had been printed and circulated throughout Europe. The printed book had come to play a central role in the diffusion of classical literature.[82] Between 1495 and 1515, the Venetian printer Aldus Manutius drew on the knowledge of Greek scholars who had arrived in Italy following the collapse of the Byzantine Empire. He published the greater part of surviving Greek literature in printed editions; without the press, the equivalent recovery of Latin texts had taken over a century.[83] Book production became increasingly commercial, and the first copyright laws were passed.[84]

Science

[edit]

The press also changed how natural philosophers worked. Although Latin scientific treatises rarely became bestsellers, the shift from script to print preceded the conceptual revolutions of the sixteenth century rather than following them. Ptolemy's Almagest had remained authoritative as an astronomical text for some fourteen hundred years, whereas Copernicus's De revolutionibus (1543) was surpassed in less than a hundred. According to Eisenstein, the difference lay less in the genius of individual investigators than in the replacement of scribe by printer. Scholars had previously circulated discoveries through manuscript letters with limited reach. The press allowed findings to reach wider audiences more quickly[85] and enabled scholars to build on each other's observations[86] across a wider geographical range than scribal exchange could reach.[87]

Printing also encouraged the gradual emergence of scientific communities whose members, scattered across Europe, could work on shared questions using shared methods and compare their results. Such communities had begun to take shape in the era of incunabula, well before the first learned journals of the late seventeenth century. Their features included the serial publication of new findings, the preservation of data across generations, a shift from professional secrecy toward public disclosure, and an exchange between informed readers and responsive authors and editors.[88] Hand-copied medical and botanical illustrations had degenerated over time, and classical authorities had warned against trusting pictures and counseled direct inspection of nature. Printed anatomical plates, herbal woodcuts, and star charts could be reproduced without further loss of detail. Observers such as Andreas Vesalius could therefore disseminate carefully drawn figures alongside their texts, making cumulative correction of the visual record possible for the first time.[89]

Politics, state and church

[edit]

Rulers and governments adapted quickly to the new medium. Princes who had previously relied on manuscript proclamations turned to print to publish declarations of war, treaties, and disputed points of policy in pamphlet form.[90] According to Eisenstein, citing the historian Geoffrey Elton, Thomas Cromwell's campaign in the 1530s supporting Henry VIII's break with Rome was the first European government effort to exploit the press for propaganda. Cromwell coordinated printers and publicists who issued vernacular tracts defending royal supremacy, while Parliament formalized the breach.[91] The French monarchy used printed bulletins on similar lines to evoke the patrie as the realm of France and to represent the king as its personification. This gave early modern states a means of conducting a "psychological war" alongside military operations.[90]

The political reach of print provoked sustained efforts at control. A series of pre-Reformation papal and episcopal censorship measures began with the Mainz archbishop's licensing edict of 1485. It culminated in the Leo X decree of 1515, which required all translations to be vetted by bishops or inquisitors. The Counter-Reformation papacy went further: the first Papal Index under Paul IV in 1559 forbade lay Catholics to read certain books, and the 1564 Index of Pius IV reiterated the prohibition on vernacular Bibles. Secular governments introduced licensing systems requiring printers to obtain authorization before issuing new works, and some jurisdictions banned imported books outright.[92] These measures had only partial success. Printed material crossed borders easily, and clandestine presses operated in many cities. The contest between authorities seeking to regulate the press and those seeking to circulate forbidden material became a recurring feature of European political life for the next three centuries.[92] Pettegree argues that print was particularly important in the confessional conflicts of the later sixteenth century, including the French Wars of Religion and the Dutch Revolt. In territories where open Protestant preaching was suppressed, pamphlets, broadsheets and clandestine printing became the main means by which Reformed ideas reached a wider public, and Catholic polemic responded in kind.[93] Printed literature later played a major role in rallying support, and opposition, during the lead-up to the English Civil War, and later the American and French Revolutions, through newspapers, pamphlets and bulletins.[94]

Quantitative work in economics has tested some of these claims. Jeremiah Dittmar has shown that cities where printing was established in the fifteenth century grew around 60 percent faster than comparable cities without presses between 1500 and 1600. Separate regressions using distance from Mainz as an instrument for press adoption support that finding.[95] Jared Rubin, using the same instrument, estimates that cities with at least one press by 1500 were 52 percentage points more likely to have adopted Protestantism by 1530, 42 by 1560, and 29 by 1600. The declining effect suggests that the press mattered most in the early phase of the Reformation, before politics and the wider diffusion of printing took over.[96]

In a survey of the literature, Sascha Becker, Steven Pfaff, and Jared Rubin distinguish between supply-side and demand-side accounts of the Reformation. Supply-side accounts emphasize institutional or technological factors such as the press; demand-side accounts emphasize the religious, political, and economic grievances that drew populations and rulers toward reform.[97] Subsequent work has refined the picture. Davide Cantoni finds that German princes were much more likely to adopt the Reformation if their immediate neighbors had done so. He attributes the apparent effect of distance from Wittenberg to strategic neighborhood interactions rather than print exposure alone.[98] Becker, Yuan Hsiao, Pfaff and Rubin reconstruct Luther's personal network from correspondence, recorded visits, and University of Wittenberg enrollments before 1523. They report that 36 percent of cities with documented contact had adopted the Reformation by 1530, compared with 6 percent of cities without contact. The authors argue that personal ties and trade-route diffusion explain the spatial pattern more fully than printing alone.[99] The press is now generally treated as one channel among several rather than the single decisive cause.[100]

Benedict Anderson places printing in a longer arc of political change. He identifies the gradual erosion of three older "axiomatic" cultural conceptions as a precondition for national consciousness in the late eighteenth century. These were that a sacred script offered privileged access to truth, that society was naturally organized under monarchs ruling by divine dispensation, and that time was indistinguishable from cosmology. For Anderson, print-capitalism was a central mechanism in this displacement. It replaced sacred languages with vernaculars, accustomed readers to news organized in homogeneous calendrical time, and contributed to the long decline of the doctrine of the divine right of kings.[101]

Contemporary criticism

[edit]

Not all contemporaries welcomed these developments. The Dominican friar Filippo de Strata, writing c.1473, characterized the press as a "whore" (meretrix) compared to the "virgin" pen, and argued that printers valued profit over accuracy and classical scholarship.[102] The Benedictine abbot Johannes Trithemius argued in his 1492 treatise De laude scriptorum manualium that printing would make monks intellectually lazy and that paper books were less durable than parchment manuscripts. He also presented hand-copying sacred text as a spiritual discipline that mechanical reproduction could not replace.[103] The Florentine humanist Niccolò Perotti argued in 1470 that many printed books in circulation were inaccurate. Gerolamo Squarzafico claimed in 1481 that most printers were illiterate, and Giorgio Merula voiced concern that printing could damage classical scholarship. The Swiss physician Paracelsus and his followers urged practitioners to reject inherited textual authority, repeating the Galenic slogan that "the sick should be the doctor's books" and promoting direct observation over book learning. Paracelsus himself made full use of print to broadcast his views. The slogan made better sense in scribal culture, where hand-copied medical illustrations had been prone to degeneration, than in print culture, where repeatable woodblock images preserved observations from nature more reliably.[104] Some critics also feared that religious heterodoxy would spread as biblical texts became accessible to readers without formal training.[102]

Language

[edit]

The spread of printing also contributed to the decline of Latin as the dominant language of publication. As works were increasingly issued in the vernacular language of each region, printed texts helped to standardize the spelling and syntax of these languages, reducing their variability. Febvre and Martin argue that printing exercised a greater influence on the development of national languages than any other single factor. They identify the process as one of several forces contributing to the rise of nationalism in Europe.[105]

Printing capacity

[edit]

The table gives reported hourly output for several press designs.

Printing speed of press designs
Design Year Impressions per hour
Hand-operated presses
Gutenberg-style c.1600 240[28]
Stanhope press c.1800 480[61]
Steam-powered presses
Koenig press 1812 800[106]
1813 1100[107]
1814 2000[62]
1818 2400[62]
[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1990. pp. 416–47.
  2. Man 2002, pp. 26, 115, 136.
  3. 1 2 Childress 2008, pp. 51–55.
  4. Eisenstein 1980, pp. 45–47.
  5. [4]; Febvre & Martin 1997, pp. 15–20; Man 2002, p. 87
  6. Wolf 1974, pp. 21–35.
  7. Onken 2009; White 1984, pp. 31ff.; Schneider 2007, pp. 156–159
  8. Schulte 1939, p. 56.
  9. Wolf 1974, pp. 39ff..
  10. Wolf 1974, pp. 39–46.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Wilkinson 2012, p. 911.
  12. Childress 2008, pp. 51–55; Hellinga 2007, p. 208: "Gutenberg's invention took full advantage of the degree of abstraction in representing language forms that was offered by the alphabet and by the Western forms of script that were current in the fifteenth century."
  13. Roberts & Skeat 1983, pp. 24–30.
  14. Roberts & Skeat 1983, pp. 1, 38–67, 75: "The most momentous development in the history of the book until the invention of printing was the replacement of the roll by the codex; this we may define as a collection of sheets of any material, folded double and fastened together at the back or spine, and usually protected by covers." (p. 1)
  15. Roberts & Skeat 1983, pp. 45–53
  16. Burns 1996, p. 418.
  17. Thompson 1978, p. 169; Tsien 1985, pp. 68–73; Lucas 2005, p. 28, fn. 70
  18. Thompson 1978, p. 169; Burns 1996, pp. 414–417
  19. Burns 1996, p. 417.
  20. Febvre & Martin 1997, pp. 41–44; Burns 1996, p. 419: "In the West, the only inhibiting expense in the production of writings for an increasingly literate market was the manual labor of the scribe himself. With his mechanization by movable-type printing in the 1440s, the manufacture of paper, until then relatively confined, began to spread very widely. The Paper Revolution of the thirteenth century thus entered a new era."
  21. Roberts & Skeat 1983, pp. 7f.: "Despite all that has been said above, even the strongest supporters of papyrus would not deny that parchment of good quality is the finest writing material ever devised by man. It is immensely strong, remains flexible indefinitely under normal conditions, does not deteriorate with age, and possesses a smooth, even surface which is both pleasant to the eye and provides unlimited scope for the finest writing and illumination."
  22. The ratio between paper and parchment copies is estimated at around 150 to 30 (Hanebutt-Benz 2000, pp. 158–189).
  23. Childress 2008, p. 60.
  24. 1 2 3 Meggs 1998, pp. 58–69.
  25. Mahnke 2009, p. 290.
  26. Kapr 1996, p. 172.
  27. Kapr 1996, p. 203.
  28. 1 2 3 Wolf 1974, pp. 67f.:
    From old price tables it can be deduced that the capacity of a printing press around 1600, assuming a fifteen-hour workday, was between 3,200 and 3,600 impressions per day.
  29. Childress 2008, p. 56.
  30. 1 2 3 Lyons 2011, p. 59.
  31. Meggs 1998, pp. 130–133.
  32. Buringh & van Zanden 2009, p. 417, table 2.
  33. Febvre & Martin 1997, pp. 248–261.
  34. 1 2 "Incunabula Short Title Catalogue". British Library. Archived from the original on 12 March 2011. Retrieved 2 March 2011.
  35. Febvre & Martin 1997, pp. 182–183.
  36. Febvre & Martin 1997, p. 182.
  37. Borsa 1976, p. 314; Borsa 1977, pp. 166–169
  38. 1 2 Buringh & van Zanden 2009, p. 417.
  39. Pollak 1972.
  40. Needham 1965, p. 211:
    The outstanding difference between the two ends of the Old World was the absence of screw-presses from China, but this is only another manifestation of the fact that this basic mechanism was foreign to that culture.
    Widmann 1974, p. 34, fn. 14:
    In East Asia, both woodblock and movable type printing were manual reproduction techniques, that is hand printing.
    Duchesne 2006, p. 83; Man 2002, pp. 112–115:
    Chinese paper was suitable only for calligraphy or block-printing; there were no screw-based presses in the east, because they were not wine-drinkers, didn't have olives, and used other means to dry their paper.
    Encyclopædia Britannica 2006: "Printing":
    The second necessary element was the concept of the printing press itself, an idea that had never been conceived in the Far East.
  41. Tsien 1985, p. 201
  42. Oh 2013, p. 108.
  43. Issawi 1980, p. 492.
  44. Pettegree 2015, p. 104.
  45. Duchesne 2006, p. 83.
  46. Weber 2006, pp. 387f..
  47. Pettegree 2015, pp. 336–337.
  48. The Incunabula Short Title Catalogue listed 29,777 separate editions (not copies) as of 8 January 2008, a total that includes some items printed after 1500. Bettina Wagner gives 28,107 editions published before 1501: Wagner, Bettina (2008). "Das Second-Life der Wiegendrucke. Die Inkunabelsammlung der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek". In Griebel, Rolf; Ceynowa, Klaus (eds.). Information, Innovation, Inspiration. 450 Jahre Bayerische Staatsbibliothek (in German). Munich: K. G. Saur. pp. 207–224. ISBN 978-3-598-11772-5. (figure at pp. 207–208).
  49. Assange, Julian (2012). Cypherpunks : freedom and the future of the internet. Internet Archive. [India] : Times Group Books. ISBN 978-93-82299-37-0.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link)
  50. Lent 1980, pp. 129–130.
  51. Priolkar, Anant Kakba (1958). The Printing Press in India: Its Beginnings and Early Development. Bombay: Marathi Samshodhana Mandala. pp. 3–4.
  52. Lent 1980, p. 119.
  53. Lent 1980, p. 120.
  54. Watson, William J. (1968). "İbrāhīm Müteferriḳa and Turkish Incunabula". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 88 (3): 435–441. doi:10.2307/596868. JSTOR 596868.
  55. McMurtrie, Douglas C. (1943). The Book: The Story of Printing & Bookmaking (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 141–143.
  56. Pollak 1972, pp. 227–228.
  57. 1 2 Pollak 1972, p. 228.
  58. Pollak 1972, pp. 228–229.
  59. Moran 1973, pp. 46–47.
  60. Moran 1973, p. 53.
  61. 1 2 Bolza 1967, p. 80.
  62. 1 2 3 Bolza 1967, p. 88.
  63. 1 2 Moran 1973, p. 105.
  64. Moran 1973, pp. 105–106.
  65. Moran 1973, pp. 107–108.
  66. Moran 1973, pp. 109–110.
  67. Meggs 1998, p. 147.
  68. "Richard March Hoe | American inventor and manufacturer". Encyclopedia Britannica. Archived from the original on 25 July 2020. Retrieved 28 June 2020.
  69. Peck, Harry Thurston (1895). The International Cyclopædia A Compendium of Human Knowledge, Revised with Large Additions · Volume 12. Dodd, Mead & Company. p. 168. Retrieved 28 June 2020.
  70. Moran 1973, pp. 148–153.
  71. Meggs 1998, p. 134.
  72. "Printing - The 20th Century". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 8 December 2025. Retrieved 27 March 2026.
  73. Romano, Frank J. (1986). Machine Writing and Typesetting. Graphic Arts Research Center, Rochester Institute of Technology. pp. xi–xii. ISBN 978-0-89938-016-2.
  74. Kipphan, Helmut (2001). Handbook of Print Media: Technologies and Production Methods. Springer. pp. 6–12. ISBN 978-3-540-67326-2.
  75. Eisenstein 1980, pp. xv–xvi.
  76. Friedman, Robert, ed. (1998). The Life Millennium: The 100 Most Important Events & People of the Past 1000 Years. Life Books, Time Inc.; distributed by Bulfinch Press. p. 166. ISBN 978-0-8212-2557-8. Retrieved 20 March 2024.
  77. Eisenstein 1980, pp. 80–88.
  78. Eisenstein 1980, pp. 88–92.
  79. Eisenstein 1980, pp. 129–131.
  80. Eisenstein 1980, pp. 131–133.
  81. Febvre & Martin 1997, pp. 262–265.
  82. Febvre & Martin 1997, pp. 262, 265.
  83. Barker 1978, p. 74.
  84. Febvre & Martin 1997, pp. 160–164.
  85. Grant, Edward (2007). "The Transformation of Medieval Natural Philosophy from the Early Modern Period to the End of the Nineteenth Century". A History of Natural Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press. p. 287. ISBN 978-0-521-68957-1. Numerous...significant books...appeared in the late sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Because they were produced by the printing press, these books were rapidly disseminated throughout Europe. Scholars in different countries studied the same mathematical and scientific diagrams and illustrations and read the same texts of a given author. Science was thus standardized in a way that was unimaginable before the 1450s.
  86. Wootton, David (2015). The Invention of Science: A New History of the Scientific Revolution. New York: Harper. pp. 197–198. ISBN 978-0-06-175952-9. Printing made it possible for Brahe to survey a wide range of publications (there were over a hundred on the comet of 1577, though many were merely astrological prognostications) and demonstrate that the four best observers had produced results compatible with his own. It also ensured that Brahe's new system was quickly known throughout Europe, so that his arguments could be tested against the nova of 1604 and the comets of 1618. Printing created a community of astronomers working on common problems with common methods and reaching agreed solutions.
  87. Eisenstein 1980, pp. 453–455, 462–466.
  88. Eisenstein 1980, p. 462.
  89. Eisenstein 1980, pp. 469–470, 484–486.
  90. 1 2 Eisenstein 1980, p. 135.
  91. Eisenstein 1980, p. 312.
  92. 1 2 Eisenstein 1980, pp. 347–350.
  93. Pettegree 2005.
  94. Bailyn & Hench 1981, pp. 1–3.
  95. Dittmar 2011, p. 1133.
  96. Rubin 2014, pp. 270–271, 281.
  97. Becker, Pfaff & Rubin 2016, pp. 1–4.
  98. Cantoni 2012, p. 502.
  99. Becker et al. 2020, p. 861.
  100. Becker, Pfaff & Rubin 2016, pp. 16–18.
  101. Anderson 2006, pp. 36, 39–46.
  102. 1 2 Lee 2022.
  103. Trithemius & Behrendt 1974.
  104. Eisenstein 1980, pp. 474, 484–486.
  105. Febvre & Martin 1997, pp. 319–332.
  106. Bolza 1967, p. 83.
  107. Bolza 1967, p. 87.

Bibliography

[edit]

On the effects of the printing press

[edit]

Technology of printing

[edit]
  • Bolza, Hans (1967), "Friedrich Koenig und die Erfindung der Druckmaschine", Technikgeschichte (in German), 34 (1): 79–89
  • Borsa, Gedeon (1976), "Druckorte in Italien vor 1601", Gutenberg-Jahrbuch (in German): 311–314
  • Borsa, Gedeon (1977), "Drucker in Italien vor 1601", Gutenberg-Jahrbuch (in German): 166–169
  • Brekle, Herbert E. (1995), "Eine weitere Spur einer typographischen Werkstatt beim Kloster Prüfening im 12. Jahrhundert", Gutenberg-Jahrbuch (in German), 70: 23–26
  • Brekle, Herbert E. (1997), "Das typographische Prinzip. Versuch einer Begriffsklärung", Gutenberg-Jahrbuch (in German), 72: 58–63
  • Brekle, Herbert E. (2005), Die Prüfeninger Weihinschrift von 1119. Eine paläographisch-typographische Untersuchung (brief summary) (in German), Regensburg: Scriptorium Verlag für Kultur und Wissenschaft, ISBN 978-3-937527-06-2
  • Burns, Robert I. (1996), "Paper comes to the West, 800–1400", in Lindgren, Uta (ed.), Europäische Technik im Mittelalter. 800 bis 1400. Tradition und Innovation (in German) (4th ed.), Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag, pp. 413–422, ISBN 978-3-7861-1748-3
  • Childress, Diana (2008), Johannes Gutenberg and the Printing Press, Minneapolis: Twenty-First Century Books, ISBN 978-0-7613-4024-9
  • Duchesne, Ricardo (2006), "Asia First?", The Journal of the Historical Society, 6 (1): 69–91, doi:10.1111/j.1540-5923.2006.00168.x
  • Hanebutt-Benz, Eva-Maria (2000), "Gutenbergs Erfindungen", Gutenberg. Aventur und Kunst: Vom Geheimunternehmen zur ersten Medienrevolution (in German), Mainz: Stadt Mainz, pp. 158–189
  • Hellinga, Lotte (2007), "The Gutenberg Revolutions", in Eliot, Simon; Rose, Jonathan (eds.), A Companion to the History of the Book, Blackwell Publishing, pp. 207–220, ISBN 978-1-4051-2765-3
  • Issawi, Charles (1980), "Europe, the Middle East and the Shift in Power: Reflections on a Theme by Marshall Hodgson", Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22 (4): 487–504, doi:10.1017/s001041750000949x, S2CID 143805644
  • Kapr, Albert (1996), Johannes Gutenberg. The Man and his Invention, Aldershot: Scolar, ISBN 978-1-85928-114-7
  • Koch, Walter (1994), Literaturbericht zur mittelalterlichen und neuzeitlichen Epigraphik (1985–1991), Monumenta Germaniae Historica: Hilfsmittel (in German), vol. 14, München: Harrassowitz Verlag, ISBN 978-3-44717-094-9
  • Lehmann-Haupt, Hellmut (1940), "Englische Holzstempelalphabete des XIII. Jahrhunderts", Gutenberg-Jahrbuch (in German): 93–97
  • Lipinsky, Angelo (1986), "La pala argentea del Patriarca Pellegrino nella Collegiata di Cividale e le sue iscrizioni con caratteri mobili", Ateneo Veneto (in Italian), 24: 75–80
  • Lucas, Adam Robert (2005), "Industrial Milling in the Ancient and Medieval Worlds. A Survey of the Evidence for an Industrial Revolution in Medieval Europe", Technology and Culture, 46 (1): 1–30, doi:10.1353/tech.2005.0026, S2CID 109564224
  • Lyons, Martyn (2011), Books: A Living History, Los Angeles: Getty Publications, ISBN 978-1-60606-083-4
  • Mahnke, Helmut (2009), Der kunstreiche Johannes Gutenberg und die Frühzeit der Druckkunst (in German), Norderstedt: Books on Demand, ISBN 978-3-8370-5041-7
  • Meggs, Philip B. (1998), A History of Graphic Design (3rd ed.), John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-0-471-29198-5
  • Moran, James (1973), Printing Presses: History and Development from the Fifteenth Century to Modern Times, Berkeley: University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-02245-4
  • Needham, Joseph (1965), Science and Civilisation in China, Physics and Physical Technology, vol. 4, Cambridge University Press
  • Oh, Young Kyun (2013), Engraving Virtue: The Printing of a Premodern Korean Moral Primer, Brill
  • Onken, Björn (2009), "Presses", in Cancik, Hubert; Schneider, Helmuth (eds.), Brill's New Pauly
  • Pettegree, Andrew (2005), Reformation and the Culture of Persuasion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511614613, ISBN 978-0-521-60264-8
  • Pettegree, Andrew (2015), Brand Luther: How an Unheralded Monk Turned His Small Town into a Center of Publishing, Made Himself the Most Famous Man in Europe – and Started the Protestant Reformation, New York: Harper Press, ISBN 978-1-59420-496-8
  • Pollak, Michael (1972), "The Performance of the Wooden Printing Press", The Library Quarterly, 42 (2): 218–264, doi:10.1086/620028, JSTOR 4306163
  • "Printing", Encyclopædia Britannica, 2006, retrieved 27 November 2006
  • Roberts, Colin H.; Skeat, T. C. (1983), The Birth of the Codex, London: Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-726024-1
  • Schneider, Helmuth (2007), "Technology", in Scheidel, Walter; Morris, Ian; Saller, Richard (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World, Cambridge University Press, pp. 144–171, ISBN 978-0-521-78053-7
  • Schulte, Alfred (1939), "Papierpresse, Druckerpresse und Kelter", Gutenberg-Jahrbuch (in German): 52–56
  • Thompson, Susan (1978), "Paper Manufacturing and Early Books", Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 314 (1): 167–176, Bibcode:1978NYASA.314..167T, doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1978.tb47791.x, S2CID 85153174
  • Tsien, Tsuen-Hsuin (1985), Paper and Printing, Science and Civilisation in China, vol. 5, Cambridge University Press
  • Weber, Johannes (2006), "Strassburg, 1605: The Origins of the Newspaper in Europe", German History, 24 (3): 387–412, doi:10.1191/0266355406gh380oa
  • White, K. D. (1984), Greek and Roman Technology, London: Thames and Hudson
  • Widmann, Hans (1974), "Der koreanische Buchdruck und Gutenbergs Erfindung", Gutenberg-Jahrbuch (in German): 32–34
  • Wilkinson, Endymion (2012), Chinese History: A New Manual, Harvard University Asia Center for the Harvard-Yenching Institute, ISBN 978-0-674-06715-8
  • Wolf, Hans-Jürgen (1974), Geschichte der Druckpressen (in German) (1st ed.), Frankfurt/Main: Interprint

Further reading

[edit]
  • Berthold, Arthur Benedict (1970), American colonial printing as determined by contemporary cultural forces, 1639–1763, New York: B. Franklin, ISBN 978-0-8337-02616
  • Bechtel, G. (1992), Gutenberg et l'invention de l'imprimerie (in French), Paris: Fayard, ISBN 978-2-213-02865-1
  • Boruchoff, David A. (2012), "The Three Greatest Inventions of Modern Times: An Idea and Its Public", in Klaus Hock; Gesa Mackenthun (eds.), Entangled Knowledge: Scientific Discourses and Cultural Difference, Münster: Waxmann, pp. 133–163, ISBN 978-3-8309-2729-7
  • Crompton, Samuel Willard (2004), The Printing Press. Transforming Power of Technology, Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers, ISBN 978-0-7910-7451-0
  • Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. (2005), The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe (2nd, rev. ed.), Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-60774-2
  • Fontaine, Jean-Paul (1999), L'aventure du livre: Du manuscrit medieval a nos jours (in French), Paris: Bibliothèque de l'image
  • Gerhardt, Claus W. (1971), "Warum wurde die Gutenberg-Presse erst nach über 350 Jahren durch ein besseres System abgelöst?", Gutenberg-Jahrbuch (in German): 43–57
  • Gerhardt, Claus W. (1978), "Besitzt Gutenbergs Erfindung heute noch einen Wert?", Gutenberg-Jahrbuch (in German): 212–217
  • Hind, Arthur M., An Introduction to a History of Woodcut, Houghton Mifflin Co. 1935 (in USA), reprinted Dover Publications, 1963 ISBN 0-486-20952-0
  • McLuhan, Marshall (1962), The Gutenberg Galaxy, The Making of Typographic Man, University of Toronto Press, OCLC 428949
[edit]