Jump to content

M31-2014-DS1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
M31-2014-DS1
Observation data
Epoch J2000.0      Equinox J2000.0
Constellation Andromeda
Right ascension 00h 45m 13.47509s[1]
Declination +41° 32′ 33.1467″[1]
Apparent magnitude (V) ~22 (pre-2014)[citation needed]
Characteristics
Evolutionary stage Yellow supergiant (progenitor)[2]
Variable type Failed supernova (candidate)[2]
Astrometry
Proper motion (μ) RA: −0.171[1] mas/yr
Dec.: −0.106[1] mas/yr
Parallax (π)0.0948±0.2315 mas[1]
Distance2.5M ly
(770k[2] pc)
Details[2]
Progenitor
Luminosity93,325 L
Temperature4,500 K
Other designations
M31-2014-DS1, M31-DS1
Database references
SIMBADdata

M31-2014-DS1 is a failed supernova candidate located in the Andromeda Galaxy (M31). It is a massive star observed to have undergone a "silent" collapse directly into a black hole without a characteristic supernova explosion. The event, characterized by a brief infrared brightening followed by the total disappearance of the progenitor star in optical wavelengths, provides observational evidence for the failed supernova theory of stellar evolution.[2]

Observation history

[edit]

The progenitor star was identified in archival data as a luminous red supergiant with an initial mass estimated at approximately 13 M.[2] In 2014, the object underwent a significant mid-infrared outburst, increasing in luminosity as detected by the Spitzer Space Telescope and the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE).

Following this peak, the star began a steady decline in brightness. By 2023, deep imaging from the W. M. Keck Observatory and the Hubble Space Telescope confirmed that the star was no longer visible. Unlike a standard Type II supernova, no luminous optical transient was detected during the collapse.[2]

Physical mechanism

[edit]

The disappearance of M31-2014-DS1 is attributed to the collapse of the stellar core after the exhaustion of nuclear fuel. In typical stars of this mass range, the collapse triggers a shockwave that expels the outer layers. However, in the case of M31-2014-DS1, the shock failed to overcome the material falling inward.[2]

Neutrino emission

[edit]

Theoretical models of the collapse suggest a brief, intense burst of neutrinos occurred at the moment of event horizon formation. The abrupt cessation of the neutrino signal marks the exact point of black hole birth.[3]

Dust shell and remnant

[edit]

The infrared signature observed in 2014-2016 is believed to be caused by a small fraction of the stellar envelope (~1 M) being ejected at low velocities, subsequently cooling and forming a shroud of dust.[2] The remaining mass collapsed into a stellar-mass black hole.

Scientific significance

[edit]

The discovery addresses the "missing supernova" problem, where the number of observed supernovae is lower than predicted by the star formation rate. M31-2014-DS1 suggests that a significant fraction of massive stars may end their lives as failed supernovae rather than in bright explosions.[2]

Recent studies have also used this event to calibrate neutrino detectors like Super-Kamiokande, as the energy profile of the neutrinos provides data on the mass of the progenitor and the state of matter during collapse.[3]

Alternative explanations

[edit]

Several researchers have proposed alternative models to explain the star's infrared behavior and subsequent disappearance in optical wavelengths.

Stellar merger

[edit]

Some models suggest the 2014 infrared outburst was not a precursor to the collapse, but rather a luminous red nova event caused by the merger of two stars. In this scenario, the "disappearance" is actually the merged remnant being temporarily shrouded by a thick, expanding shell of ejected material.[4]

Extreme obscuration

[edit]

Observations in early 2026 using the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) have detected a persistent, albeit faint, mid-infrared source at the progenitor's coordinates. This has led some astronomers to argue that the star has not vanished, but has instead entered a phase of extreme mass loss, creating a dust cocoon thick enough to block all visible light.[5]

Unsteady mass loss

[edit]

A 2026 preprint suggests the event could be an unusually long-duration eruption of a luminous blue variable star, which can mimic the appearance of a "disappearing" star before eventually re-emerging decades later.[4]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e Vallenari, A.; et al. (Gaia collaboration) (2023). "Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 674: A1. arXiv:2208.00211. Bibcode:2023A&A...674A...1G. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940. S2CID 244398875. Gaia DR3 record for this source at VizieR.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j De, Kishalay; MacLeod, Morgan; Jencson, Jacob E.; Lovegrove, Elizabeth; Antoni, Andrea; Kara, Erin; Kasliwal, Mansi M.; Lau, Ryan M.; Loeb, Abraham; Masterson, Megan; Meisner, Aaron M.; Panagiotou, Christos; Quataert, Eliot; Simcoe, Robert (2026-02-12). "Disappearance of a massive star in the Andromeda Galaxy due to formation of a black hole". Science. 391 (6786): 689–693. arXiv:2410.14778. Bibcode:2026Sci...391..689D. doi:10.1126/science.adt4853. PMID 41678628.
  3. ^ a b Suwa, Yudai; Akaho, Ryuichiro; Ashida, Yosuke; Harada, Akira; Harada, Masayuki; Koshio, Yusuke; Mori, Masamitsu; Nakanishi, Fumi; Nakazato, Ken'Ichiro; Sumiyoshi, Kohsuke; Wendell, Roger A.; Zaizen, Masamichi (2025). "Neutrino Constraints on Black Hole Formation in M31". The Open Journal of Astrophysics. 8. arXiv:2504.19510. Bibcode:2025OJAp....8E.167S. doi:10.33232/001c.147127.
  4. ^ a b Soker, Noam (2026-01-19). "The failed failed-supernova scenario of M31-2014-DS1". arXiv:2601.14497 [astro-ph.HE].
  5. ^ Beasor, Emma R.; Smith, Nathan; Pearson, Jeniveve; Subrayan, Bhagya; Berger, Edo; Sand, David J.; Strader, Jay (2026). "The fate of the failed supernova candidate M31-2014-DS1". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 546 (3) stag052. arXiv:2601.05317. Bibcode:2026MNRAS.546ag052B. doi:10.1093/mnras/stag052.