Jump to content

Distributism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Distributivism" redirects here. For the algebraic concept, see Distributivity.
Self-portrait of G. K. Chesterton based on the distributist slogan "Three acres and a cow"

Distributism is an economic theory asserting that the world's productive assets and means of production should be widely owned and distributed rather than concentrated in the hands of a few individuals or the state.[1] Developed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, distributism was grounded in Catholic social teaching principles, especially those of Pope Leo XIII in the encyclical Rerum novarum (1891) and Pope Pius XI in Quadragesimo anno (1931).[2][3][4] It influenced Anglo Christian Democratic movements,[5] and is recognized as one of the intellectual foundations of the social market economy.[6][7]

Distributism rejects both laissez-faire capitalism and state socialism, arguing that both systems are flawed and exploitative due to extreme concentration of economic power and ownership. It instead advocates for an economic order based on widespread private property, independent small producers, Small and medium-sized enterprises, cooperatives, and mutual societies, supported by strong anti-monopoly regulations. Property, in this view, is not an absolute right but carries a social function, serving the common good and human dignity.

History and precedents

[edit]

Distributist principles were not invented in the 20th century; similar economic and social arrangements existed across many regions long before formal theory was developed.

Pre‑Ottoman Distributism

[edit]

Before the rise of the Ottoman Empire, across Anatolia, the Balkans, Greece, Syria, and Armenia, societies operated under systems that closely matched distributist ideals. Key features included:

  • Decentralized economies based on small family-owned farms and local production;
  • Self-governing villages with communal land use and decisions made through local assemblies;
  • Craft guilds and brotherhoods — such as the *Ahi* order, *Futuwwah* traditions, and Christian artisan corporations — which protected small ownership, regulated prices, prohibited monopolies and usury, and enforced ethical trade rules;
  • Moral economies reinforced by Eastern Christian and classical Islamic teachings, which prioritized community welfare over accumulation;
  • Application of the subsidiarity principle: political authority existed primarily to protect communities, not control daily economic life.

These structures flourished in the Byzantine Empire, mediaeval Serbian, Bosnian, Bulgarian, Armenian, and Georgian kingdoms, Seljuk Anatolia, and city‑states like Aleppo and Damascus. Under early Ottoman rule, they survived largely intact — notably through the *timar* system, which granted tax rights but not land ownership, preserving peasant holdings. From the 16th–17th centuries, however, centralization, large private estates (*çiftliks*), and state regulation eroded autonomy. The 19th‑century *Tanzimat* reforms formally ended these traditions, dissolving guilds and legalizing concentrated ownership. Pre‑Ottoman distributism thus evolved gradually: preserved, transformed, and eventually replaced — yet proving that distributist societies were historically viable.

Early National Implementations

[edit]

Spain: CEDA

[edit]

The Confederación Española de Derechas Autónomas (CEDA), active during the Second Spanish Republic, represented the first systematic attempt to implement distributism as national policy. Rooted explicitly in Rerum novarum and Quadragesimo anno, it rejected class struggle and aimed for an order built on:

  • Agrarian reform breaking up large estates and distributing land to families;
  • Protection of small rural and urban property;
  • Strong intermediate institutions, autonomous communities, and pluralism;
  • A subsidiary state, with civil society and the Church playing central roles.

Though not using the term "distributism", its program corresponded exactly to the theory’s core principles.

Austria: The Ständestaat (1933–1938)

[edit]

Distributism in Austria refers to the practical implementation of distributist principles during the Corporate State (Ständestaat) from 1933 to 1938, under Chancellor Engelbert Dollfuss. Inspired by Catholic social teaching — especially the encyclicals Rerum novarum and Quadragesimo anno — this model rejected both liberal capitalism and socialism, promoting a decentralized economy based on the widespread distribution of family private property, subsidiarity, and organic solidarity.

Following the collapse of the Austro‑Hungarian Empire, Austria faced a severe crisis: unemployment reached 26 %, inflation was high, and society was deeply divided. Dollfuss sought a Christian and community‑centred "Third Way". He dissolved extremist parties and established a Catholic corporate state, protecting family property as a moral responsibility subordinate to the common good — rather than an absolute privilege. The system organised society into vocational corporations (agriculture, crafts, workers, trade), modelled on medieval guilds, to resolve conflicts internally and foster cooperation instead of class struggle.

Key policies included agricultural cooperatives, subsidised rural credit, the Land für die Familie programme — which redistributed land to families — and incentives for smallholdings. Between 1934 and 1937, the share of land held by family farms rose from 61 % to 73 % of all cultivated area.

The results were significant: unemployment fell to 14 % by 1937, agricultural production increased by 18 %, and the Gini coefficient dropped from 0.44 to 0.36. Around 3,800 new cooperatives were created, the public budget was balanced, strikes decreased by 40 %, and urban crime fell by 15 % — reflecting greater family stability and social cohesion.

Portugal: Estado Novo

[edit]

Under António de Oliveira Salazar, distributist principles shaped rural and agrarian policy, focusing on family‑scale property and production. Measures included:

  • Distribution of unused land and creation of agricultural settlements;
  • Grants, credit, and machinery support for small farmers;
  • Allotments of up to 15 hectares per family, especially in overseas territories;
  • A model rooted in "land, family, and work" as the foundation of economic life.

Finland: Lex Kallio (1922)

[edit]

Finland applied distributism through the *Lex Kallio*, a law enabling landless farmers and tenants to acquire land from the state, church, or large private holdings on favourable terms. By 1937, it had created around 150 000 independent small farms, drastically expanding ownership and reducing rural inequality. It relied on strong municipal autonomy — a direct application of subsidiarity — with the central state providing only funding and legal framework.

Contemporary examples

[edit]

Emilia‑Romagna, Italy

[edit]

One of the most successful modern examples of distributism is the Italian region of Emilia-Romagna, with Bologna as its capital. Over 45% of regional GDP is generated by cooperatives, and its standard of living is twice the national average and among the highest in Europe. This model developed from:

  • Italy’s late, fragmented industrialization, which limited large‑scale capital accumulation;
  • A historical focus on specialized, export‑oriented small and medium enterprises;
  • Dense networks of cooperatives, shared expertise, and community‑centred governance.

It demonstrates that a decentralized, broad‑ownership economy can be highly competitive and prosperous.

Historical examples

[edit]
  • Taiwan: Post‑war land reform broke up large estates, granted land to tenant farmers, and built an economy of small owners — widely analysed as a successful distributist‑style transformation and the foundation for equitable development.
  • Lusitania: In pre‑Roman Iberia, customary systems of shared land, smallholdings, and communal governance closely matched distributist ideals long before formal doctrine.
  • Zoroastrian Tradition: Texts such as the Avesta contain ethical rules against hoarding, support for broad ownership, and an economic morality centred on community welfare — showing that distributist intuitions are deeply rooted in human social thought.

Modern influence

[edit]

Distributism remains influential in Christian democratic, agrarian, and social‑economic movements worldwide. In the United States, the American Solidarity Party adopts distributism in its platform, stating: "We advocate for an economic system which focuses on creating a society of wide‑spread ownership — sometimes referred to as 'distributism' — rather than reducing the human person to a cog in the machine."[8] It is also cited as an inspiration for fair trade, localism, and community economic development.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

[9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19]

[20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30]

[31] [32] [33] [34]

[35] [36] [37] [38]

Overview

[edit]

According to distributists, the right to property is a fundamental right,[39] and the means of production should be spread as widely as possible rather than being centralised under the control of the state (statocracy), a few individuals (plutocracy), or corporations (corporatocracy). Therefore, distributism advocates a society marked by widespread property ownership.[1] Cooperative economist Race Mathews argues that such a system is key to creating a just social order.[40]

Distributism has often been described in opposition to both laissez-faire capitalism and state socialism[41][42] which distributists see as equally flawed and exploitative.[43] Furthermore, some distributists argue that state capitalism and state socialism are the logical conclusion of capitalism as capitalism's concentrated powers eventually capture the state.[44][45] Thomas Storck argues: "Both socialism and capitalism are products of the European Enlightenment and are thus modernising and anti-traditional forces. In contrast, distributism seeks to subordinate economic activity to human life as a whole, to our spiritual life, our intellectual life, our family life."[46] A few distributists, including Dorothy Day,[47] were influenced by the economic ideas of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon and his mutualist economic theory.[48] The lesser-known anarchist branch of distributism of Day and the Catholic Worker Movement can be considered a form of free-market libertarian socialism due to their opposition to state capitalism and state socialism.[49]

Some have seen it more as an aspiration, successfully realised in the short term by the commitment to the principles of subsidiarity and solidarity (built into financially independent local cooperatives and small family businesses). However, proponents also cite such periods as the Middle Ages as examples of the long-term historical viability of distributism.[50] Particularly influential in the development of distributist theory were Catholic authors G. K. Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc,[43] two of distributism's earliest and strongest proponents.[51][52][53]

Background

[edit]

The mid-to-late 19th century witnessed an increase in the popularity of political Catholicism across Europe.[54] According to historian Michael A. Riff, a common feature of these movements was opposition to secularism, capitalism, and socialism.[52] In 1891 Pope Leo XIII promulgated Rerum novarum, in which he addressed the "misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class" and spoke of how "a small number of very rich men" had been able to "lay upon the teeming masses of the laboring poor a yoke little better than that of slavery itself".[55] Affirmed in the encyclical was the right of all men to own property,[56] the necessity of a system that allowed "as many as possible of the people to become owners",[57] the duty of employers to provide safe working conditions[58] and sufficient wages,[59] and the right of workers to unionise.[60] Common and government property ownership was expressly dismissed as a means of helping the poor.[61][62]

Around the start of the 20th century, G. K. Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc drew together the disparate experiences of the various cooperatives and friendly societies in Northern England, Ireland, and Northern Europe into a coherent political theory which specifically advocated widespread private ownership of housing and control of industry through owner-operated small businesses and worker-controlled cooperatives. In the United States in the 1930s, distributism was treated in numerous essays by Chesterton, Belloc and others in The American Review, published and edited by Seward Collins. Pivotal among Belloc's and Chesterton's other works regarding distributism are The Servile State[63] and Outline of Sanity.[64]

Economic theory

[edit]

Private property

[edit]

In Rerum novarum, Leo XIII states that people are likely to work harder and with greater commitment if they possess the land on which they labour, which in turn will benefit them and their families as workers will be able to provide for themselves and their household. He puts forward the idea that when men have the opportunity to possess property and work on it, they will "learn to love the very soil which yields in response to the labor of their hands, not only food to eat, but an abundance of the good things for themselves and those that are dear to them".[65] He also states that owning property is beneficial for a person and his family and is, in fact, a right due to God having "given the earth for the use and enjoyment of the whole human race".[66]

G. K. Chesterton presents similar views in his 1910 book, What's Wrong with the World. Chesterton believes that whilst God has limitless capabilities, man has limited abilities in terms of creation. Therefore, man is entitled to own property and treat it as he sees fit, stating: "Property is merely the art of the democracy. It means that every man should have something that he can shape in his own image, as he is shaped in the image of heaven. But because he is not God, but only a graven image of God, his self-expression must deal with limits; properly with limits that are strict and even small."[67]

According to Belloc, the distributive state (the state which has implemented distributism) contains "an agglomeration of families of varying wealth, but by far the greater number of owners of the means of production". This broader distribution does not extend to all property but only to productive property; that is, that property which produces wealth, namely, the things needed for man to survive. It includes land, tools, and so on.[68] Distributism allows society to have public goods such as parks and transit systems. Distributists accept that wage labour will remain a small part of the economy, with small business owners hiring employees, usually young, inexperienced people.[69][70]

Redistribution of wealth and productive assets

[edit]

Distributism requires either direct or indirect distribution of the means of production (productive assets)⁠—in some ideological circles including the redistribution of wealth—to a wide portion of society instead of concentrating it in the hands of a minority of wealthy elites (as seen in its criticism of certain varieties of capitalism) or the hands of the state (as seen in its criticism of certain varieties of communism and socialism).[1][39] More capitalist-oriented supporters support distributism-influenced social capitalism (also known as a social market economy),[71][72][73] while more socialist-oriented supporters support distributism-influenced libertarian socialism.[74] Examples of methods of distributism include direct productive property redistribution, taxation of excessive property ownership, and small-business subsidization.[75]

Guild system

[edit]
See also: Gremialismo

Distributists advocate in favour of the return of a guild system to help regulate industries to promote moral standards of professional conduct and economic equality among members of a guild. Such moral standards of professional conduct would typically focus on business conduct, working conditions and other issues in relation to industry specific matters such as workplace training standards.[76]

Banks

[edit]

Distributism favours cooperative and mutual banking institutions such as credit unions, building societies and mutual banks. This is considered to be the preferred alternative to private banks.[77]

Social theory

[edit]

Human family

[edit]

G. K. Chesterton considered one's home and family the centrepiece of society. He recognized the family unit and home as centrepieces of living and believed that every man should have his property and home to enable him to raise and support his family. Distributists recognize that strengthening and protecting the family requires that society be nurturing.[78]

Subsidiarity

[edit]
Main article: Subsidiarity

Distributism puts great emphasis on the principle of subsidiarity. This principle holds that no larger unit (whether social, economic, or political) should perform a function that a smaller unit can perform. In Quadragesimo anno, Pope Pius XI provided the classical statement of the principle: "Just as it is gravely wrong to take from individuals what they can accomplish by their own initiative and industry and give it to the community, so also it is an injustice and at the same time a grave evil and disturbance of right order to assign to a greater and higher association what lesser and subordinate organizations can do".[79]

Social security

[edit]

The Democratic Labour Party of Australia espouses distributism and does not hold the view of favouring the elimination of social security who, for instance, wish to "[r]aise the level of student income support payments to the Henderson poverty line".[80]

The American Solidarity Party has a platform of favouring an adequate social security system, stating: "We advocate for social safety nets that adequately provide for the material needs of the most vulnerable in society".[81]

Politics

[edit]
Distributism's relation to socialism and capitalism

The position of distributists, when compared to other political philosophies, is somewhat paradoxical and complicated (see triangulation). Firmly entrenched in an organic but very English Catholicism, advocating culturally traditional and agrarian values, directly challenging the precepts of Whig history—Belloc was nonetheless an MP for the Liberal Party, and Chesterton once stated, "As much as I ever did, more than I ever did, I believe in Liberalism. But there was a rosy time of innocence when I believed in Liberals".[82]

Distributism does not favour one political order over another (political accidentalism). While some distributists such as Dorothy Day have been anarchists, it should be remembered that most Chestertonian distributists are opposed to the mere concept of anarchism. Chesterton thought that distributism would benefit from the discipline that theoretical analysis imposes and that distributism is best seen as a widely encompassing concept inside of which any number of interpretations and perspectives can fit. This concept should fit a political system broadly characterized by widespread ownership of productive property.[83]

In the United States, the American Solidarity Party generally adheres to Distributist principles as its economic model. Ross Douthat and Reihan Salam view their Grand New Party, a roadmap for revising the Republican Party in the United States, as "a book written in the distributist tradition".[84]

The Brazilian political party, Humanist Party of Solidarity, was a distributist party, alongside the National Distributist Party in England,[85] and the Democratic Labour Party in Australia.

In the first round of the 2024 Romanian presidential election, candidate Călin Georgescu, an independent candidate who advocates for a system based on distributism and sovereigntism received 23% of votes and qualified for the second round.[86]

Influence

[edit]

E. F. Schumacher

[edit]

Distributism is known to have influenced the economist E. F. Schumacher,[87] a convert to Catholicism.[88]

Mondragon Corporation

[edit]

The Mondragon Corporation, based in the Basque Country in a region of Spain and France, was founded by a Catholic priest, Father José María Arizmendiarrieta, who seems to have been influenced by the same Catholic social and economic teachings that inspired Belloc, Chesterton, Father Vincent McNabb, and the other founders of distributism.[89]

Guild of St Joseph and St Dominic

[edit]

Distributist ideas were put into practice by The Guild of St Joseph and St Dominic, a group of artists and craftsmen who established a community in Ditchling, Sussex, England, in 1920, with the motto "Men rich in virtue studying beautifulness living in peace in their houses". The guild sought to recreate an idealised medieval lifestyle in the manner of the Arts and Crafts Movement. It survived for almost 70 years until 1989.

Big Society

[edit]

The Big Society was the flagship policy idea of the 2010 UK Conservative Party general election manifesto. Some distributists claim that the rhetorical marketing of this policy was influenced by aphorisms of the distributist ideology and promotes distributism.[90] It purportedly formed a part of the legislative programme of the Conservative – Liberal Democrat Coalition Agreement.[91]

List of distributist parties

[edit]

Current

[edit]

Historical

[edit]

Notable distributists

[edit]

Historical

[edit]

Contemporary

[edit]

Key texts

[edit]
  • Rerum novarum (1891), papal encyclical by Pope Leo XIII.
  • Quadragesimo anno (1931), papal encyclical by Pope Pius XI.
  • Centesimus Annus (1991), papal encyclical by Pope John Paul II.
  • Evangelii gaudium (2013), apostolic exhortation by Pope Francis.
  • What's Wrong with the World (1910) by G. K. Chesterton ISBN 0-89870-489-8 – eText.
  • The Outline of Sanity (1927) by G. K. Chesterton.
  • Utopia of Usurers (1917) by G. K. Chesterton.
  • The Servile State (1912) by Hilaire Belloc.
  • An Essay on The Restoration of Property (1936) by Hilaire Belloc ISBN 0-9714894-4-0.
  • Jobs of Our Own (1999) by Race Mathews ISBN 978-1871204179.

See also

[edit]
Related concepts
Similar positions

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c Zwick, Mark and Louise (2004). The Catholic Worker Movement: Intellectual and Spiritual Origins . Paulist Press. p. 156. ISBN 978-0-8091-4315-3
  2. ^ Coulter, Michael (2007). Encyclopedia of Catholic Social Thought, Social Science and Social Policy. Scarecrow Press. p. 85. ISBN 978-0-8108-5906-7
  3. ^ McConkey, Dale; Lawler, Peter (2003). Faith, Morality, and Civil Society. Lexington Books. p. 50. ISBN 978-0-7391-0483-5
  4. ^ Allitt, Patrick (2000). Catholic Converts: British and American Intellectuals Turn to Rome. Cornell University Press. p. 206. ISBN 978-0-8014-8663-0
  5. ^ Caldecott, Stratford (1991). "Distributism and Christian Democracy". The Chesterton Review. 17 (1): 141–142. doi:10.5840/chesterton199117151.
  6. ^ Belloc, Hilaire (1982). Wünsche, Horst Friedrich (ed.). The Restoration of Property. Ludwig-Erhard-Stiftung. pp. 331–334. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |title2= ignored (help)
  7. ^ Corrin, Jay P. (1988). "The Neo-Distributism of Friedrich A. Hayek and Wilhelm Röpke". Thought: A Journal of Philosophy. 63 (251): 397–412. doi:10.5840/thought198863429.
  8. ^ "Platform". American Solidarity Party. Archived from the original on 10 June 2021. Retrieved 14 October 2020.
  9. ^ Angeliki E. Laiou (ed.) – The Economic History of Byzantium
  10. ^ Peter Charanis – “The Aristocracy of Byzantium”
  11. ^ Nicholas Oikonomides – Byzantine State and Society
  12. ^ Nina Garsoïan – The Armenian People from Ancient to Modern Times
  13. ^ Ronald Grigor Suny – The Making of the Georgian Nation
  14. ^ John V.A. Fine – The Late Medieval Balkans
  15. ^ Florin Curta – Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages
  16. ^ Donald Nicol – The Despotate of Epirus
  17. ^ Michael Angold – Byzantine Empire, 1025–1204
  18. ^ David Morgan – The Mongols
  19. ^ Halil İnalcık – The Ottoman Empire: The Classical Age
  20. ^ G.K. Chesterton – The Outline of Sanity
  21. ^ Hilaire Belloc – The Servile State
  22. ^ E.F. Schumacher – Small Is Beautiful
  23. ^ John Médaille – Toward a Truly Free Market
  24. ^ John D. Mueller – Redeeming Economics
  25. ^ Vendidad 4.51, tradução de L. H. Mills
  26. ^ António Manuel Hespanha – As Vésperas do Leviathan; História das Instituições
  27. ^ José Mattoso – Identificação de um País; A Nobreza Medieval Portuguesa
  28. ^ A. H. de Oliveira Marques – História de Portugal (vols. medievais)
  29. ^ Irmina Guimarães – Os Baldios em Portugal
  30. ^ Maria Helena da Cruz Coelho – O Município Medieval Português
  31. ^ Verfassung des Bundesstaates Österreich (1 de Maio de 1934) – Constituição austríaca corporativa
  32. ^ Österreichisches Statistisches Zentralamt, Statistisches Handbuch für die Republik Österreich, 1936–1938
  33. ^ Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft im Ständestaat, relatórios econômicos do Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO), Viena, 1937
  34. ^ Engelbert Dollfuss, Der christliche Ständestaat (1934)
  35. ^ Jörg Guido Hülsmann, The Austrian Economists and the Christian Corporate State
  36. ^ Ulrich Nersinger, Der christliche Ständestaat – Katholische Soziallehre in der Zwischenkriegszeit (Bonn, 1995)
  37. ^ David A. Redles, Catholic Corporatism and the Failure of Liberal Democracy in Austria (Marquette University Press, 2008)
  38. ^ John D. Médaille, Toward a Truly Free Market (ISI Books, 2010), cap. 8
  39. ^ a b Shiach, Morag (2004). Modernism, Labour and Selfhood in British Literature and Culture, 1890–1930. Cambridge University Press. p. 224. ISBN 978-0-521-83459-9
  40. ^ Gibson-Graham, J.K. (2006). A Postcapitalist Politics. University of Minnesota Press. p. 224. ISBN 978-0-8166-4804-7.
  41. ^ Boyle, David; Simms, Andrew (2009). The New Economics. Routledge. p. 20. ISBN 978-1-84407-675-8
  42. ^ Novak, Michael; Younkins, Edward W. (2001). Three in One: Essays on Democratic Capitalism, 1976–2000. Rowman and Littlefield. p. 152. ISBN 978-0-7425-1171-2
  43. ^ a b Prentiss, Craig R. (2008). Debating God's Economy: Social Justice in America on the Eve of Vatican II. Penn State University Press. p. 77. ISBN 978-0-271-03341-9
  44. ^ "Why Isn't Romania Rich?". Front Porch Republic. 5 December 2012. Retrieved 8 August 2017.
  45. ^ "Distributism as an equalitarian economic policy". Humanist Society of New South Wales Inc. Retrieved 8 August 2017.
  46. ^ Storck, Thomas. "Capitalism and Distributism: two systems at war," in Beyond Capitalism & Socialism. Tobias J. Lanz, ed. IHS Press, 2008. p. 75
  47. ^ Dorothy, Day. On Pilgrimage. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1999. p. 40.
  48. ^ McKay, Iain. An Anarchist FAQ Volume One. AK Press, 2007. p. 75
  49. ^ McKay, Iain. An Anarchist FAQ Volume One. AK Press, 2007. p. 23
  50. ^ Hilaire Belloc, "The Servile Institution Dissolved," The Servile State, (1913; reprint, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1977), 71–83.
  51. ^ Fitzgerald, Ross et al. (2003). The Pope's Battalions: Santamaria, Catholicism and the Labor Split. University of Queensland Press. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-7022-3389-0
  52. ^ a b Riff, Michael A. (1990). Dictionary of Modern Political Ideologies. Manchester University Press. p. 35. ISBN 978-0-7190-3289-9
  53. ^ Schulz, Jr., William Patric (2017). Dorothy Day's Distributism and Her Vision for Catholic Politics (PhD thesis). Louisiana State University.
  54. ^ Adams, Ian (1993). Political Ideology Today. Manchester University Press. pp. 59–60. ISBN 978-0-7190-3347-6
  55. ^ Leo XIII, Rerum novarum, 3.
  56. ^ Leo XIII, Rerum novarum, 6.
  57. ^ Leo XIII, Rerum novarum, 46.
  58. ^ Leo XIII, Rerum novarum, 42.
  59. ^ Leo XIII, Rerum novarum, 45.
  60. ^ Leo XIII, Rerum novarum, 49.
  61. ^ Leo XIII, Rerum novarum, 4.
  62. ^ Leo XIII, Rerum novarum, 15.
  63. ^ Hilaire Belloc, The Servile State, The Liberty Fund, originally published 1913.
  64. ^ G. K. Chesterton, The Outline of Sanity, IHS Press, 2002, originally published 1927.
  65. ^ Pope Leo XIII, Rerum novarum : 47, 1891
  66. ^ Pope Leo XIII, Rerum novarum: 8, 1891.
  67. ^ Chesterton, Gilbert Keith, What's Wrong with the World (1920), p. 59.
  68. ^ Hilaire Belloc, The Servile State, 1913.
  69. ^ Baccelli, Zebulon. "Practical Policies for a Distributist Economy: Part Two". imagodeipolitics.org. Archived from the original on 25 December 2019. Retrieved 25 December 2019.
  70. ^ Aleman, Richard. "INDUSTRY: THE DISTRIBUTIST SOLUTION". distributistreview.com. Retrieved 25 December 2019.
  71. ^ "Platform". American Solidarity Party. Retrieved 12 April 2018.
  72. ^ "Christian Democracy". American Solidarity Party. Archived from the original on 16 November 2018. Retrieved 18 July 2018.
  73. ^ "Did you know there's a third party based on Catholic teaching?". Catholic News Agency. 12 October 2016. Retrieved 1 January 2020. We believe in the economic concept of distributism as taught by GK Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc.
  74. ^ McKay, Iain. An Anarchist FAQ: AFAQ Volume One. AK Press: Oakland, CA. (2008) pp 22.
  75. ^ "A Misunderstanding About Method". Society of Gilbert Keith Chesterton. 20 November 2010. Retrieved 10 May 2022.
  76. ^ Penty, Arthur (21 October 2019). Distributism: A Manifesto. The Real Press. ISBN 9781912119820.
  77. ^ Staff, T. S. I. (30 August 2017). "G K CHESTERTON, HILAIRE BELLOC AND DISTRIBUTISM DOWN UNDER". The Sydney Institute. Retrieved 27 May 2023.
  78. ^ "G.K. Chesterton's Distributism". The Distributist Review. Retrieved 23 March 2022.
  79. ^ Pope Pius XI, Quadragesimo anno, 1931.
  80. ^ Cath (11 September 2015). "Policy: Students". Democratic Labour Party. Archived from the original on 24 February 2019. Retrieved 23 February 2019.
  81. ^ "Solidarity Party Platform". American Solidarity Party. Archived from the original on 10 June 2021. Retrieved 1 January 2020.
  82. ^ Chesterton, G. K. (2008). Orthodoxy. BiblioBazaar. p. 49. ISBN 978-0-554-33475-2.
  83. ^ G. K. Chesterton, The Outline of Sanity(Norfolk, Va.: IHS Press, 2001), p. 90
  84. ^ Ross Douthat (27 March 2013). "Twitter post".
  85. ^ "View registration – The Electoral Commission". search.electoralcommission.org.uk.
  86. ^ "Călin Georgescu și Elena Lasconi, în turul doi al alegerilor prezidenţiale 2024". 25 November 2024.
  87. ^ Opdebeeck, Hendrik, ed. Frontiers of Business Ethics, Volume 11 : Responsible Economics : E. F. Schumacher and His Legacy for the 21st Century. Oxford, GBR: Peter Lang AG, 2013. p. 12.
  88. ^ Phillips, Leigh (30 October 2015). Austerity Ecology & the Collapse-Porn Addicts: A Defence Of Growth, Progress, Industry And Stuff. John Hunt Publishing. ISBN 978-1-78279-961-0.
  89. ^ Mathews, Race. Jobs of Our Own: Building a Stakeholder Society. Fernwood Publishing. 1999.
  90. ^ A Potential Step in the Right Direction Archived 21 October 2014 at the Wayback Machine 21 July 2010
  91. ^ Cameron and Clegg set out 'big society' policy ideas BBC News 18-May-2010
  92. ^ "Distributism". Democratic Labour Party. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  93. ^ "Platform". American Solidarity Party. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  94. ^ Corção, Gustavo (1946). Três alqueires e uma vaca: Capa com desenho de G. K. Chesterton (in Brazilian Portuguese). Livraria AGIR.
  95. ^ "Articles on Distributism – 2" Archived 26 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine by Dorothy Day. The Catholic Worker, July–August 1948, 1, 2, 6
  96. ^ "Dorothy Day, Peter Maurin, & Distributism", in The Hound of Distributism.
  97. ^ "The Distributist Review – Dale Ahlquist". Distributistreview.com. Archived from the original on 6 June 2014. Retrieved 5 June 2014.
  98. ^ Bikaj, Albert (19 February 2022). "Not Everything is for Sale: A Critique of Neoliberalism". The European Conservative. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
  99. ^ Allan Carlson (12 July 2009). ""A Distributist View of the Global Economic Crisis": A Report". Front Porch Republic. Retrieved 5 June 2014.
  100. ^ "About". Practical distributism. 2 February 2023. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
  101. ^ "What is Integralism?". 9 September 2020.
  102. ^ Programul economic al lui Călin Georgescu, câștigătorul primului tur al alegerilor prezidențiale: Prin acest program se ridică Steagul Adevărului, al Iubirii, al Trezirii conștiinței Binelui și frumosului în noi toți!, hotnews.ro, 25 November 2024
  103. ^ "Alfa y Omega, nº 775 / 1-III-2012, En portada". alfayomega.es. 27 May 2013. Archived from the original on 27 May 2013.
  104. ^ Mark Stahlman. "Rocking the Bus". Strategy+Business. Retrieved 29 July 2018.
  105. ^ Richard Williamson, Mgr; Peter Chojnowski, Dr; McCann, Christopher (April 2004). he+rural+solution+williamson "The Rural Solution: Modern Catholic Voices on Going 'Back to the Land'". IHS Press. ISBN 9781605700212.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&oldid=1353986629"