jump to navigation

‘All’s there to love/ Only love’ August 3, 2009

Posted by dolorosa12 in fangirl, life, memories, music, reviews.
Tags: , , , , ,
4 comments

This is not the post I intended to write. This is the post that came to me in an opium-induced dream…er, no. This is the post that popped into my head as I was wandering back from Mill Road, trying to think of ways to avoid packing my belongings up in preparation for moving house. The idea, however, has been bubbling around in my mind since Raphael came to visit in April. We were talking about music, and about the first band, song or album that caused us to really listen to music in a different way.

For me, that band was Massive Attack. The album was Mezzanine. The song was ‘Risingson’. The year was 2001.

When you are a child or young teenager, you listen to music in a rather undiscriminating way (I use ‘you’ to mean ‘me’, of course). The first people to inform your tastes are your parents, and you listen to their music in a rather passive way. You might end up preferring several bands over others, but you do not yet have the tools to articulate why. Thus, I liked The Pogues, Paul Simon, Deborah Conway, Steeleye Span and Annie Lennox, but didn’t really have any reason for doing so beyond a vague sense of liking the sound.

The same goes for when you get a little older and begin to be influenced more by your friends, the radio and music videos (well, if you’re a 90s child who grew up watching Rage and Video Hits or their equivalents). You like certain songs and bands because the people around you like them. Hence, Savage Garden, Hanson, Regurgitator, Backstreet Boys, Silverchair, Aqua and a truly bizarre parade of one-hit wonders (The Mavises? Eiffel 65? Shanks and Bigfoot?). But again these are the tastes of other people and not your own.

So what changes? Well, for me at least (a person who loves to reduce life to a series of ‘She turned a corner and everything changed’ moments), I listened to one song, and then one album, by one band, and it totally changed the way I listened to music, to the extent to which I believe that nothing I did before that moment can truly be called ‘listening to music’.

When I was 16, in early 2001, I went around to an acquaintance’s house with a bunch of other friends. We were meant to be preparing for a group oral presentation on Oedipus Rex for our English class, but, as in so many cases, we abandoned work in favour of socialising. One of my friends put on a CD. It was Mezzanine by Massive Attack.

I had heard their song ‘Teardrop’ before; it had been all over the airwaves in 2000, and I had enjoyed it and been seriously creeped out by its video clip. But I hadn’t thought about the band beyond that. As the scratchy, sinister notes of ‘Angel’ melded with Horace Andy’s silky singing, I pricked up my ears, and began to really listen. By the time we’d got to the next track, ‘Risingson’, I had begun to do something I’d never done before when listening to music: listening with half my ear attuned to the lyrics (which I was analysing like a literary text) and half my ear attuned to the way the lyrics and sound were perfectly fused:

‘Where have all those flowers gone?
Long time passing
Why you keep me tsk and keep me tasking
You keep on asking.’

Before the year was out, I’d bought Mezzanine and Massive Attack’s two other albums, Blue Lines and Protection (Hundredth Window had not been released at that stage). Although Mezzanine remained my favourite (and is, in fact, my favourite album still), I adored the earlier albums too. But why? Why would albums about race relations, immigration and the transformed culture of early 90s Britain (Blue Lines and Protection) and about disgust with the hedonism of the Bristol scene (Mezzanine, which is also meant to be the best album to get high to) have anything to say to a nerdy, middle-class, shy Canberran teenager?

Well, it was the twofold nature of Massive Attack’s lyrics that appealed. On the one hand, they were highly specific, tied to trip-hop, Bristol, Britain, the 90s. On the other, they reached out for the universal with literary and musical allusions. They were at once intensely self-absorbed and personal and overwhelmingly communicative and broadly-focused.

Take ‘Five Man Army’, the fifth track from Blue Lines. The song is packed with internal references to the band (‘Wild Bunch crew at large’) and its history (‘When I was a child I played subbuteo on/ My table then I graduate to studio one/ ’Cos D’s my nom de plume you know but 3’s my pseudonym’). At the same time, it manages to squeeze in a selection of pop-cultural shout-outs (‘I take a small step now it’s a giant stride/ People say I’m loud why should I hide’; ‘See we’re rockin’ in your area rock beneath your balcony/ My baby just cares for me well that’s funny/ Her touch tickles especially on my tummy’; ‘It’s started by Marconi resumed by Sony/ A summary by wireless history and only’; and, arguably, ‘Money money money/ Root of all evil’). There are a series of thematic riffs running through the song, melded coherently, dropped and picked up again at exactly the right place but emphasised in a slightly different way (‘I quietly observe/ Though it’s not my space’ subtly reworks the opening lyrics of ‘I quietly observe/ Standing in my space’, for example). This is a rap song, the type of rap song that is all about talking oneself up, but it’s posturing via literary allusion rather than the usual bragging about one’s car, posse and sexual prowess.

Aside from the lines ‘I quietly observe standing in my space/ Daydreaming’, which has become a kind of personal mantra, ‘Five Man Army didn’t really speak to me in any kind of meaningful way (although I gained great pleasure unpicking the lyrics and musing on the way they fitted together). But there are many Massive Attack songs that seemed to be written especially for me.

‘Protection’ spoke directly to my teenage loneliness, my (misplaced, as it turns out) sense of grief and my desire to be cared for. It sounds pathetic now, but when I was 17, and entering my second year of unrequited love, hearing the beautiful voice of Tracy Thorn singing

This girl I know needs some shelter
She don’t believe anyone can help her
She’s doing so much harm, doing so much damage
But you don’t want to get involved
You tell her she can manage
And you can’t change the way she feels
But you could put your arms around her

I know you want to live yourself
But could you forgive yourself
If you left her just the way
You found her

meant so much. Every time I hear that song, I remember all my wasted emotion on a guy I referred to in my diaries as ‘You’ (with the capital Y) and stared at in what I thought was a wanly plaintive expression across classrooms.

All teenagers have a misguided sense of the significance of their own suffering, but I’m grateful that my personal emo soundtrack was ‘Protection’ and not ‘Welcome To The Black Parade’.

If I was an emo, I was also a wannabe hippie. I kid you not when I say that as a teenager I truly intended to live out my adult days as an environmental protester. And, would you believe it, Massive Attack have a hippie, ‘everyone hold hands together and sing kumbaya’ song. It’s called ‘The Hymn of the Big Wheel’, and it is sung by the incomparable Horace Andy, and it is beautiful.

I’d like to feel that you could be free
Look up at the blue skies beneath a new tree
Sometime again
You’ll turn green and the sea turns red
My son I said the power of axis over my head
The big wheel keeps on turning
On a simple line day by day
The earth spins on its axis
One man struggle while another relaxes

We sang about the sun and danced among the trees
And we listened to the whisper of the city on the breeze
Will you cry in the most in a lead-free zone
Down within the shadows where the factories drone
On the surface of the wheel they build another town
And so the green come tumbling down
Yes close your eyes and hold me tight
And I’ll show you sunset sometime again

I challenge you to listen to this and not be moved. It has an innocence and purity, and a knowing cynicism all at once. It could only have been written in the 90s, with the environmental movement hovering in the background, and the potential of the internet as a tool of both distance and closeness hovering beyond the comprehension of most people. The song makes you want to dance barefoot in the mud and watch the clouds, and then burst into tears at the thought of the butchered Tasmanian rainforests.

Then there’s the truly bizarre ‘Sly’. ‘I already know my children’s children’s faces/ Voices that I’ve heard before’. What the hell is that all about? And then we come to:

I feel like a thousand years have passed
I’m younger than I used to be
I feel like the world is my home at last
I know everyone that I meet […]

Wondering is this there all there is
Since I was since I began to be
Wondering, wandering
Where we can do what we please
Wondering

If you think about those lyrics, you know all you’ll ever need to know to understand me as I was then, as I am now, and as I will always be. ‘Sly’ expresses a mindset of mine that is expressed in a similar way by Jo Walton in The King’s Peace, the first volume of her two-part Arthurian alt-history series:

What it is to be old is to remember things that nobody else alive can remember. I always say that when people ask me about my remarkable long life. Now they can hear me when I say it. Now, when I am ninety-three and remember so many things that are to them nothing but bright legends long ago and far away. I do not tell them that I said that first when I was seventeen, and felt it too…So I have been old by my own terms since I was seventeen.

– Jo Walton, The King’s Peace, Penguin, p ix.

I haven’t even got on to Mezzanine yet. In my mind, no one will ever make a more perfect album. (I know this is a controversial opinion among Massive Attack fans, since this was the album that caused serious fractures in the bands and marked a departure from Massive Attack’s original sound.) It is a brilliant, coherent unity of words, sound and theme. The songs can be paired to give a broader, more complex understanding of their writers’ ideas.

For example, ‘Inertia Creeps’ is a record of a destructive, unsatisfying relationship from the guy’s perspective. He knows there’s something not quite right going on (‘Will you take a string/ Say you string me along’), but he chooses to ignore it, so he can get some action, essentially. Two songs later (and it’s significant that the song between is called ‘Exchange’, since we exchange points of view) is ‘Dissolved Girl’, the same story told from the perspective of the girl. Only now do we have the complete story. She doesn’t love him, and he knows it, but says nothing. She stays because the alternative is worse, and says nothing. He can feel the inertia creeping, moving up slowly, and says nothing. She stays, despite the fact that the relationship is destroying her sense of self (‘Shame, such a shame/ I think I kind of lost myself again’). We’re meant to lose ourselves in love, but surely staying in a loveless relationship and allowing whatever happens to happen causes an equal loss of identity. A dissolution. It’s seriously powerful stuff, and I wish I could say that I appreciate it solely on an intellectual level.

Moving along, we come to what are in my opinion the ‘Big Three’ of the album (I adore ‘Teardrop’ to bits, but it’s so overplayed, and I will limit myself to saying that its lines ‘Love, love is a verb/ Love is a doing word’ are among my favourite song lyrics ever, and Liz Fraser’s vocals are incredible) – ‘Black Milk’, ‘Mezzanine’ and ‘Group Four’.

‘Black Milk’ has an illusion of simplicity. Its lines are short, brief, and almost curt. But a closer look reveals hidden depths. The hovering, dark notes of the music evokes the watery, dark corners of the ocean floor, and I almost picture a series of bizarre marine creatures, the lights on their bodies illuminating the gloom in the higher points of the music. Liz Fraser’s voice is incredible, cutting through the sinister music with shimmering clarity. The sound is amazingly cold, and amazingly pure. And what of the words themselves? They are beautiful, but kind of creepy at the same time:

Eat me
In the space
Within my heart

Unlike ‘Inertia Creeps’ and ‘Dissolved Girl’, which are about being lost in the lack of love, ‘Black Milk’ is about being lost in love:

All’s there to love
Only love

Next up is ‘Mezzanine’, in my opinion the most perfect song ever written (it could only be more perfect if it had a female singer soaring in above 3D and Daddy G). What can I say about it that I haven’t said already? I associate it with the SPOILER WARNING FOR THE ‘TROY GAME’ BOOKS relationship between Asterion/Weyland and Cornelia/Eaving/Noah in Sara Douglass’ Troy Game series, which is my model for Great Love And Its Power To Save The World And All People. Even as the lyrics allude to something I believe deeply (that true love is the instigator of personal improvement, and if it doesn’t change you, it’s not love), they are playfully punning:

I could be yours
We can unwind
All these other flaws
All these other flaws
All these other flaws
Will lead to mine

We can unwind
All these other flaws
All these other flaws
Will lead to mine
Will see to
All these other flaws
All these other flaws
Will see to
All these other flaws
Will lead to mine
We can unwind all our flaws
We can unwind all our flaws

Flaws-floors. The song’s called ‘Mezzanine’. Get it? It’s glorious stuff. (By the way, you might’ve noticed that I changed the lyrics from ‘All these have flaws’ as the lyrics website has to ‘All these other flaws’. I may be wrong, but I think that the lyrics should read ‘All these other flaws’. It makes more sense if the song is punning on flaws-floors.)

Finally we have ‘Group Four’, which acts as a counterpoint to the bleakness of ‘Inertia Creeps’ and ‘Dissolved Girl’. This song is sung by a man (3D) and a woman (Liz Fraser), unlike ‘Inertia Creeps’ and ‘Dissolved Girl’, which each have only one singer. They are in harmony. They are not lost and dissolved and inert. They are found. She is a person again, with a sense of self (‘See through me little glazed lane/ A world in myself/ Ready to sing’). He has lost his apathy and inertia (‘Flickering I roam’ and ‘I see to bolts/ Put keys to locks/ No boat are rocked/ I’m free to roam’). All is right with the world.

I could go on, but this post is now longer than some of the essays I’ve had to write for uni, and I don’t know how short your attention spans are. I’ve put a lot of myself into this post, and it is more personal than anything I would normally write on this particular blog, but it had to be said. Massive Attack absolutely changed the world for me. They made me listen to music in a different way, and have had an extraordinary influence on the way I appreciated both my old favourite bands and every new song I heard. Never before had music shown me both the world, and myself, more clearly.

Master of Philosophy? July 21, 2009

Posted by dolorosa12 in life, memories, uni.
Tags: , , , , ,
4 comments

I can’t believe it’s been a month since I updated this blog! I feel incredibly guilty about that, since so much has been happening. My mother’s just left for Heathrow after staying here for six weeks, during which time we went to Spain, walked 22 miles to Ely, and ate way too much Indian food, but before I talk about all that, I’d like to fill you in on the biggest news: I graduated!

Me with my snazzy Cambridge degree.

Me with my snazzy Cambridge degree.

Like all things related to Cambridge, the graduation ceremony was poorly organised and highly ritualised. We were told that it would begin at 11 o’clock. We were to present ourselves for inspection (we had to be correctly dressed) at college at 10 o’clock, and our guests had to be at Senate House by 10.50. When we got to college, we were informed that the ceremony would actually start at midday. I had no way to contact my mother, as she had my phone, which was switched off. So I sat in the SBR with one of my housemates, watching appalling reality TV on the computer, agonising about my poor guests.

After an hour, we started our procession through town. This is a tradition for the graduation ceremony, and I’m certainly glad I am a member of a college that’s close to Senate House. I can’t imagine how awful it would be to process from somewhere like Girton, running the inevitable gauntlet of gawking, camera-happy tourists.

The ceremony itself was very quick: no long-winded, patronising speeches like at Sydney. You (I swear I’m not making this up) hold the college Praelector’s fingers, he says some Latin over you, you kneel down in front of the Vice-Chancellor (in our case it was the Vice-Chancellor’s representative), she says some more Latin over you (‘In the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit’ – non-Christian monotheists can opt out with ‘in the name of God’, but there’s no opt-out phrasing for atheists or polytheists, unfortunately), you walk away and someone hands you your degree. You then hang around outside Senate House until the session is over and then everyone swarms out to congratulate you.

It felt a bit more anticlimactic than when I graduated from Sydney, simply because I graduated with college people rather than my friends from my course (although two of them were at my session). Somehow it’s more meaningful and more poignant and more significant to graduate surrounded by those who went through everything with you.

Prior to graduating, I’ve been having a grand time. Mum got here just before I handed in my dissertation, and it was a great relief to have her there during the final stages. Hand-in was followed by May Week, Cambridge’s traditional week of debauched excess. My May Week kicked off with the John’s May Ball, which was absolutely insane. Imagine the most over-the-top funfair+formal+barbecue+bar+al fresco dining+dance party+rave+jazz club+indie music street festival and you still haven’t quite encompassed all that the May Ball was. I had a fabulous time, but the not-quite-closet socialist in me felt a bit outraged at the excess of it all. I probably wouldn’t go again unless I was taking someone from home to show them ‘the Cambridge lifestyle’.

I followed the May Ball with several more sedate May Week activities: a couple of garden parties, which were all about the Pimm’s and the finger food. At these I caught up with the ASNaCs, which made me a little melancholy. So many of my ASNaC friends are third-year undergrads, and won’t be coming back next year.

After May Week I disappeared to London for a bit with Mum, where we stayed with friends. She did a few interviews for work and I caught up with one of my oldest friends from Canberra and her boyfriend. She was in the UK for a conference and they’d decided to make a bit of a holiday of it. I hadn’t seen her for nine months, so it was amazing to catch up.

Then it was time to return to the ‘Bridge for my viva, a nerve-wracking experience akin to being dragged across a bed of nails while having your hair pulled out strand by strand. Nothing about it was pleasant, and the examiners’ comments were interesting, to say the least, but I must have done acceptably, because my marks were good enough for me to continue for a PhD. Funding, however, remains elusive. Fingers crossed.

After the viva, Mum and I went off to Spain for eight days. We went to Madrid (where we visited three great art galleries: Thyssen-Bornemisza Museum, Reina Sofia and the Prado, as well as unexpectedly finding a fantastic Annie Leibovitz exhibition). We spent a lot of time walking around the Retiro park, where Mum got some hilarious footage of people rowing around a tiny pond, and even paying money to be taken around said pond on a little steamboat. If I can, I’ll upload it here.

After Madrid, we spent four days in Barcelona, where we mostly hung around in the gothic district of the city, apart from one day when we walked to Parc Güell, the crowning glory of Gaudí’s architecture in Barcelona. (I was hoping to see people with glowing eyes running around, à la Röyksopp’s ’49 Percent’ but alas, it was not to be.)

I’d never been to Spain before, and was most impressed at what good food you could get for basically nothing. Most places had a breakfast special (coffee, pastry or sandwich and orange juice) for about 3-4 euro, and a lunch special (three courses, drinks and bread) for 8-16 euro.

After Spain, we came back to the ‘Bridge for a few more days, then went to London, where I caught up with yet another visiting-for-a-conference old school friend (we’ve known one another since we were 11) and went on an excellent walk around Hampstead Heath. It’s amazing that such a beautiful place exists within such a huge, noisy city.

Then it was back to Cambridge for graduation and various admin-related tasks. I’m about to head off to Ireland for a Modern Irish language course, and I’ve been trying to organise that. But the whole thing was tinged with sadness. Over the past six weeks, I’ve unlearned all the independence that I gained over the nine months I’ve been away. Having my mother here was wonderful beyond words. For all I love my new friends, there’s nothing like having someone around to whom you don’t even have to explain yourself, who gets you on a level beyond language. I coped before, and I will cope again, but the initial stretching of the umbilical cord is going to be painful.

When I was a child, the world seemed so wide March 22, 2009

Posted by dolorosa12 in books, childhood, fangirl, memories.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
2 comments

For someone whose favourite series of books is about the absolute necessity of embracing conscious, adult existence, I sure spend a lot of time reminiscing about my childhood. On days when adult life seems to ‘suck beyond the telling of it’ (Gratuitous Buffy Quote #1), childhood experiences seem that much more wonderful, their joys that much fiercer, their emotions that much stronger, the whole 17 (to pluck an arbitrary number out of nowhere) years that much more meaningful than anything the previous seven have had to offer. Nowhere is this more apparent than in my attitude to my favourite texts (TV series and movies, but for the most part books) of my younger years.

It became apparent, in a couple of conversations with Sibylle, that I mythologised my personal canon of childhood to an absurd degree. Sibylle has set herself a rather awesome reading challenge this year: to read the best young-adult, science-fiction and fantasy novels out there. Since these are my three main genres, I was happy to oblige with suggestions. What we both noticed was that I was constantly saying things like ‘such and such a book was my favourite book when I was seven’ or, ‘so and so wrote the books that meant the most to me when I was a teenager’. Although I have discovered texts that I adore since hitting the wrong side of 18, they are much rarer. (Hello, current crazy Watchmen obsession! Why don’t you stand up and take a bow, Great, Epic Fangirling of Scott Westerfeld and Cory Doctorow of 2007-8? And let’s not forget the time that American Gods reduced me to a quivering heap of awed silence.)

But a recent post of Sibylle’s forced me to reexamine my rather blinkered, uncritical view of my childhood canon.

I’ve also watched Grease (1978) for the upteenth time. It was my favourite movie when I was 13, which means nothing as to its quality. I’m very suspicious of my teenage and childhood loves as I don’t think half of them were based on merit. You won’t find me writing about how wonderful something is based solely on my childhood memories of it.

Ouch. Even though she assures me this comment wasn’t aimed at me, it did make me think that I needed to assess exactly why I champion my beloved texts of childhood so fiercely.

One of the things I’ve noticed about adulthood is that you have much less time to be a narcissist. (Somewhere, my mother is rolling on the floor laughing at this admission of her most narcissistic of daughters.) I know this sounds odd coming from someone whose idea of a good time is to sit in her room, reviewing books on the internet while talking to people on IRC, but the pull of the ‘real world’ is slightly more insistent once you’re an adult. If nothing else, there’s a need to earn money to support an expensive lifestyle of Buffy boxed sets, fantasy novels and, once in a while, food. Childhood and adolescence, in contrast, offer many opportunities for sitting in one’s room, thinking about how such and such a novel (or film, or song) PERFECTLY ENCAPSULATES ONE’S LIFE. (That is, if one’s childhood is as wonderfully middle-class Canberran as mine was.) But it is not merely opportunity that causes this vastly expanded childhood canon.

I’ve realised that I like texts in three different ways. These can be roughly summarised thus:

  • Head: These texts appeal to me solely on an aesthetic level.  I appreciate the technical proficiency of their creators, and in some cases, their complex themes, but I feel no desire to reread or rewatch them.  I can’t list any examples because, once I’ve read or watched such texts, they exert no further pull on my imagination.
  • Head and Heart: These texts are aesthetically pleasing and speak to me on some personal level.  They have some kind of meaning that either fits in with my worldview or has some relevance to my life, and tend to encourage me to want to write about them and discuss them with others.  The majority of the books of my childhood would fall under this category, as would most of my current personal canon (Sophia McDougall’s Romanitas series, China Miéville’s books, Steven Saylor’s Roma Sub Rosa series, Dollhouse, most of the immrama that I’m writing about for my dissertation).
  • Head, Heart and Soul: These texts are technically proficient.  They possess themes which speak to me on a personal level and make me want to write about them and discuss them with other fans.  But, most importantly, they make me reexamine who I am, make me want to change, to become better, to think more.  These are the texts that I would quite possibly die to save.  Thinking about these texts makes my life worth living.

This last category contains such things as His Dark Materials, Buffy, Firefly, Sara Douglass’s Troy Game series, Parkland, Earthsong, Firedancer, The Beast of Heaven and Taronga by Victor Kelleher, The Tiger In The Well by Philip Pullman, The Vampire Chronicles, Catherine Jinks’s Pagan series, Adele Geras’s Tower Room series and book The Girls in the Velvet Frame, John Marsden’s Tomorrow series, Jorge Luis Borges’s Labyrinths, American Gods by Neil Gaiman, Small Gods by Terry Pratchett, the films Amelie and Waltz With Bashir, A Little Princess by Frances Hodgson Burnett, Ballet Shoes by Noel Streatfield, Jo Walton’s Tir Tanagiri Saga, Cirque du Soleil’s show Quidam, Buile Shuibne, and the graphic novel Watchmen.

Of that list, only American Gods, Small Gods, The Vampire Chronicles, Buile Shuibne, The Troy Game, The Tir Tanagiri Saga, Waltz With Bashir, Firefly and Watchmen were read/watched by me when I was an adult. And of that small list, the only ones read/watched by me after I finished my undergrad degree were Waltz With Bashir, Watchmen, American Gods and Small Gods. That’s a very small proportion of a rather large personal canon.

I do read slightly less than I did as a child (when I would routinely read three books a day), but that can’t be the only reason. Of the three books a day I read as a child, after all, not all became Head, Heart and Soul books. Why, then, are so few of the texts that have meaning for me texts I’ve discovered as an adult?

It’s not a reflection of quality. Objectively, I know, for example, that the Pagan series is of a much higher quality than the Vampire Chronicles, and that Victor Kelleher is a much better writer than Sara Douglass. I might (after doing Honours in English literature, working for five years as a book reviewer and two years as a feature sub-editor) know a bit more about what makes for bad writing than I did as a child, but none of the ‘childhood canon’ books on my list are badly written. I’ve read them all many times as an adult, and they remain as wonderful now as they seemed to me as a child.

Perhaps it has something to do with the relative complexity (and stability) of one’s adult identity in comparison to the fluidity of the identity of a child. A child is, to a certain extent, unformed, and capable of possessing many facets, not all of which must be satisfied in a work of fiction. Thus, the part of my child-self that consoled itself through ‘supposing’ was satisfied with A Little Princess, while the part of it that thought all humans were beasts found expression in the works of Victor Kelleher. I did not require a text to be all things to all parts of my personality, and so was satisfied with texts that embodied just some parts of that personality. As an adult, I require more of my texts, and so, for the most part, am disappointed in this regard. A text must, as I wrote elsewhere in this blog, speak to me and for me and and about me, but it must do so to and for and about all parts of my identity.

That is asking a lot of a text. In fact, in the face of my high-maintenance requirements of texts, it’s a wonder any have managed to find their way into my personal canon at all since I turned 18. So thank you, Neil Gaiman, Terry Pratchett, Ari Folman, Alan Moore, Sara Douglass, Jo Walton, Anne Rice, crazed anonymous medieval author of Buile Shuibne, and Joss Whedon for somehow finding a way into the seething mass of contradictions which make up my mind, heart and soul. Sometimes, your writings are the only things that make me feel anything for this confusing, terrifying, beautiful and heartbreaking thing called adulthood. For this, I am eternally grateful.

What a difference a month makes October 26, 2008

Posted by dolorosa12 in memories.
Tags: ,
2 comments

I’ve been in Cambridge for just over one month, so I thought it was about time to bore you all with my impressions of the place and my experiences. It’s hard to believe I’ve been here this long, because it seems like only yesterday I was dumped unceremoniously at Parker’s Piece, shivering in the cold, numbed with tiredness and tense with anxiety, to find my way to my college and then my house. But then I think about how much I’ve done in the past few weeks – a whirlwind of parties and pub crawls and Latin verb declensions and phone meetings with my supervisor and late-night conversations on the stairs with my housemates – and I feel that it is impossible, that I couldn’t possibly have lived so much in four short weeks.

My life is kind of divided in three, so I shall talk about each third separately.

The first third is, of course, my research, classes and the people associated with it. I’d like to say that it’s going well, but not quite as well as I’d like. My supervisor is great, the perfect combination of friendly, helpful and scary. She gives me good suggestions for books, but, being out of the country, isn’t quite as effective at prodding me to work as would be ideal. The big thing this term is the review-of-scholarship, a 5000-word literature review. My reading is going fine, but the actual writing is not going so well. I wrote 800 words this weekend. Whether they’re good words is another matter entirely. As long as I have 3000 words by the end of this week, though, I’ll be right on track.

My degree is partly coursework-based, so I take classes. I’m studying medieval Irish, Latin and medieval Welsh, as well as Modern Irish (which is just for fun and not assessed) and attending M.Phil (Masters) seminars and graduate student seminars. These all, of course, require a lot of work. Just to give you an idea, last week I: translated a whole story from the Táin, did three pages of Latin exercises, translated a big chunk of De raris fabulis, read about 80 Psalms for my M.Phil seminar, and did many pages of Modern Irish exercises. My right little finger has acquired a blister from resting against the page for prolonged periods of time.

Luckily, since I spend so much time there, the people in the ASNaC department are fantastic. They’re just the right mix of nerdy and crazy. Sometimes it’s nice to be able to talk to people who know what Buile Suibhne and Longes mac nUislenn are. Also, they’re quite fond of a party, the ASNaC crowd. We have drinks on Mondays after the grad seminars, and drinks on Friday nights (this pub is, fabulously, around the corner from my house). I suppose when we’re all studying stories where most characters spend a fair amount of time ‘at the drinking of mead’, it shouldn’t be surprising.

The next third of my time is taken up with my housemates. I’m lucky to live in a house of very sociable and friendly people. This manifests itself in big ways – such as last night, when we had a big housewarming party, inviting friends and other people from our college – or in smaller ways, such as the fact that we all cook dinner at the same time, spending a few hours each night gossiping and chatting in the kitchen. There’s none of this ‘phantom flatmate’ hiding-in-his-or-her-bedroom business here.

My final third of time is taken up with societies and clubs that I’m involved in. I’m doing two things. I volunteer at a community cafe, which is nice and laid-back and gives you that warm, fuzzy volunteering feeling. I’ve also taken up trampolining, which is mad fun. I’ve only been three times, and yesterday I learned how to do full turns into a back drop, which is scary but surprisingly elegant when you get the hang of it. Being a gymnast, I can grasp the concepts better than other first-timers, so that I know, for example, if you keep your body tight, things will work out easier for you, but it’s still a little bit scary. Trampolines are just so bouncy, and a lot of the trampolining moves seem, to my gymnast’s mentality, like falling over – you know, that thing you’re not supposed to do. But it’s lots of fun.

So, all up, I’d say, Cambridge is going well. Oh, that’s not to say that I’m never homesick, or that I don’t have days when I wake up in the morning thinking, ‘What the hell was I thinking when I decided to come here?’ but in general, I’m cheerful. Sometimes I’m in a black mood and feel like I’ll snap with irritation the next time I have to translate my Australianism into British (or American) English. Sometimes a wave of anguish hits me when I think it’s been a month since I’ve seen my mother or sister’s face. Sometimes I want to shriek with rage that I am such a blank canvas to everyone around me, my history as yet unknown and irrelevant. But mostly I wake up cheerful, confident in the knowledge that I’m doing what I want to do, in a place I want to be, surrounded by people who, if not yet friends or family or surrogate family in the way of those I’ve got back in Australia, may become such things to me in the future.

Streams and streams of consciousness August 7, 2008

Posted by dolorosa12 in books, childhood, fangirl, memories.
Tags: , , , ,
5 comments

‘People who read are always like you. You can’t just tell them, you have to tell them why.’ – Catherine Jinks, Pagan’s Crusade

‘Tell them stories.’ – Philip Pullman, The Amber Spyglass

This post was inspired by a few things, but mainly the debates I’ve been having with people on Obernet and the ‘Pub about The Dark Knight, and a subsequent IRC conversation with Di about the bizarre, incoherent criteria that determine which texts I like and which texts I loathe. “How can you hate Dickens for being too melodramatic but love Love, Actually? How can you dislike Paris, Je T’aime but read vampire romances?” she asked. Our conversation swung around to postmodernism, postcolonialism, poststructuralism, and just what kind of ‘-ist’ I am. But I’m no ‘-ist’. The only word that describes my reading and viewing preferences is ‘fangirl’. The texts I love, I love passionately; the texts I loathe, I loathe violently.

But why do I love particular texts?

For the simplest reason: They speak to me and for me and about me. Or at least they spoke to me and for me and about me at some point in my life. Here, I list the texts that make or have made my life worth living. Expect gushing. Expect incoherence. Do not expect me to follow the rules of grammar. Who can hope to contain a fangirl in full hyperbolic flight?

There is no way that I wouldn’t begin with His Dark Materials. This wondrous trilogy came into my life when I was a curious 12-year-old and it articulated things I didn’t even know I’d been thinking. The books’ publication spanned my early adolescence, so they reflected my own journey from childhood to adulthood. So far they remain the only books over which I’ve cried non-stop for three days. I do not exaggerate.

If Philip Pullman came along and reflected the thoughts of my early adolescence, Anne Rice’s Vampire Chronicles summed up my personal philosophy at the age of 21. As I said over on LJ, ‘Rice’s novels provided just the rich, philosophical feast, the melancholy musings on life, literature and mortality (and their connections), the sense of the deadening, sterilising weight of history, that I felt and yet could not articulate at the time.’ It’s the beautiful language, saying things that I’ve felt so strongly for years: ‘ “Don’t you see? I’m not the spirit of any age. I’m at odds with everything. I always have been.” “But Louis, that is the very spirit of your age. Your fall from grace, has been the fall of a century.” ‘ MY GOD, THIS IS ADULTHOOD! (And Lestat, Louis and co pwn Edward Cullen. What kind of vampire sparkles in the sun, for Joss’ sake?)

BUFFY. Raphael lists this as his religion on Facebook, and sometimes I feel the same way. What it is to be a teenager, to be a woman, MY GOD, JOSS WHEDON GETS IT. This show sums up what life means.

Sara Douglass’ Troy Game series really resonates with me. The sense that life is a series of terrible coincidences and we all need more than one lifetime to work through them is one that pretty much sums up my current world view.

And Jo Walton’s Tir Tanagiri Saga gets me from the first page. ‘What it is to be old is to remember things that nobody else alive can remember. I always say that when people ask me about my remarkable long life. Now they can hear me when I say it. Now, when I am ninety-three and remember so many things that are to them nothing but bright legends long ago and far away. I do not tell them that I said that first when I was seventeen, and felt it too…So I have been old by my own terms since I was seventeen.’ This…this is just…me talking!

Victor Kelleher, MY GOD, The Beast of Heaven is just the story of humanity, I felt like I’d been hit by a train when I read it.

Catherine Jinks’ Pagan series. All I can do is swoooooooooon. The first literary character I’ve ever fallen head over heels in love with (setting me up for a lifetime of falling hopelessly in love with sarcastic, arrogant nerdboys).

Cirque du Soleil…those acrobats, doing what they do, are what I would be if I could, they are what I am inside (and “Banquine” is just AMAZING).

In the musical department, Massive Attack, Calexico and The Pogues and all those other clever-lyric’d musicians who sing the words right out of my mouth…they make the world a lovely, beautiful place.

John Marsden, whose Tomorrow series is a cri de coeur for Australian teenagers.

A Little Princess – as a child, its heroine’s ability to escape the horrors of her life through ‘supposing’ was the most powerful and profoundly meaningful message for me.

xkcd is modern-day poetry. Enough said.

Scott Westerfeld – currently vying with Joss as pop-culturally cool writer who is really a teenage girl.

Why are so many of the books that speak to me are young-adult books, or fantasy novels? Sara Douglass says it so much better than I do. Sophie Masson makes a similar point in many of her YA novels, which are often about the interplay between the fairy Otherworlds and the ‘real’ world, how each needs the other to survive. The Otherworld is a metaphor for the world of the imagination. Books (and movies, and music) are otherworlds. They are essential to our souls. They feed us, they sustain us, then lift us up, they entrance and enrapture. Their worlds sing to us.

Years and years ago, in one of my ‘paper’ diaries, I wrote this about books. Books (and the occasional movie or TV series, but for the most part books) taught me how to be brave, how to be compassionate, how people interact and act towards one another, WHY people behave as they do, how to be a friend, a daughter, a mother, a sister, a lover, how to feel and WHY to feel, how to justify my existence, how to reconcile the evil in me with a yearning to do good, what to be afraid of, what to hate, how to speak and write and read, what to love and what to want to love, how to be good and how to be bad, what true cruelty is, what true compassion and courage and sacrifice are, when to be strong and when to yield, what it is to be a child and a teenager and an adult and how these three are connected, how to grow old, how to accept death, how to comprehend suffering and injustice. In short, they taught me how to be a human being.

I love books that do these things. I NEED them to do these things. Because, ultimately, all I want, all I need, in a book, is to look into that Otherworldly mirror and see myself reflected back in all my myriad possibilities.

Aww, what?!?!, or the Dralion ‘review’ (read: 1018 gushing words) August 5, 2008

Posted by dolorosa12 in cirque du soleil, fangirl, memories.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Yep, I went to Cirque du Soleil’s show Dralion tonight. If you don’t know what that is, aren’t prepared to look it up and don’t know why I might be almost beyond coherence right now, then get the hell out of my blog!

So, I was looking forward to Dralion almost as much as I’d looked forward to Quidam, which is for me the standard-setter of Cirque shows. I’d seen Dralion on TV years ago, when I was still in high school, and always considered it to have the most consecutive good acts. (Most of the other shows are a bit patchy. As my mother said to me, ‘Once you’ve seen one person doing aerial contortions in silks, you’ve seen them all.’) I also like the music of Dralion, the grand operatic sweeping vistas-ness of it. Here’s an example, with the old singers. The look of the show, the story (which is the story of the Earth, based on interplay between the four elements, and time, all represented by dancers) is just perfect, too.

So what about the acts themselves? Here is where I’m not sure it is a good idea to know the show off by heart before seeing it live.

The first act was hand-balancing. Not a great, ‘with-a-bang’ start, but competent. The performer is brilliantly talented, it is incredibly difficult to do what she’s doing, but I’ve just seen so much hand-balancing already. Luckily, the show picked up the energy with the next act, which was a bunch of guys twirling, tumbling over and juggling Chinese poles. Incredible music, it got the heart thumping, in preparation for the heart-stopping trampoline act, where acrobats bounced off trampolines to run up 10-metre-high walls, leaping from one trampoline to another. No wires, one crash mat, 20 guys spotting on the floor below. Curt barks of ‘Going’ to alert their fellow acrobats of their movements. Don’t try this at home, kids. This is where the title of this post comes from – the annoying guy sitting next to Mimi, exclaiming ‘Aww, what?!?!’ every time the performers did something particularly gravity-defying. The juggling act was brilliant, although now that the amazing Victor Kee has left, it’s lost some of its punch, but I can still remember the day Mimi and I spent analysing it as a text about the end of innocence and growth of maturity, and so it has a warm place in my heart. I know it off by heart, to the extent that when one of the SURCAS guys at Sydney Uni did a juggling act at a Theatre Sports Grand Final, I recognised it as the Dralion act.

Then there was the final act of Act I. Duo Trapeze. Dear God, I can’t even write about this one, I’m reduced to a gibbering mess at its down-smiting awesomeness. So why don’t I show you?

INTERMISSION: During which time our three intrepid heroines reminisced about old Cirque shows, established that if working on the principle that babies see everything from their mothers’ uterus, all three have all seen exactly the same number of Cirque shows, since Le Cirque Réinventé was viewed when the mother of the three was pregnant with her second daughter.

So, the second act opened with a lengthy and moving song by the male singer, and then segued into the aerial pas de deux…er, pas de une??? Where was the male acrobat? This is what I mean when I say that it’s a bad thing to know the show off by heart – you notice mistakes and absences. But it was a ‘messing about with silks’ act, not one of ‘mine’, so I didn’t care too much. The singing was still beautiful, although a bit out of place…all those ‘mi amores’? In the absence of her partner, what was the acrobat’s ‘amore’? The silk?

Then there was the ballet dancing on lightbulbs. This is the kind of act where Cirque shines: take an ancient circus classic (in this case, adagio) and then add a crazy, mind-bendingly incongruous addition (in this case, put the bases in ballet shoes, and have the whole thing take place on lightbulbs). Beautiful.

The act with the dralions and ball-balancing was good, apart from a few misshaps, and the hoop-diving act was out of this world. However, sometimes I wish I didn’t watch so closely (I like to see all the technical, ‘behind the scenes’ stuff, like which performer is calling the act, who is spotting whom, how the performers keep each other aware of their movements), as I saw one acrobat completely baulk at his leap through the (rotating) hoops, and the Gaya dancer have to dance out while the hoops made a full rotation and got back to the original, baulking acrobat. But God, the energy of that act was insane! I wanted to leap up and dance. They had us all clapping and screaming and cheering along with the music.

As Mum said, it might’ve been better to end with this act. The finale, a skipping-rope act, was great, but it lacked that breathtaking, heartbreaking beauty that had characterised the hoop-diving.

Interspersed through all this was some amazing clowning, definitely top quality. I’m not a huge fan of clowns, and normally feel like they’re something to put up with before getting back to the point of the show, but these guys were great. I can’t say much more without writing a massive spoiler, so I’ll shut up, but trust me, the clowns were cool.

Overall, I’d say Dralion had some great acts. The trampolining, hoops, lightbulb ballet (because I’m an adagio fangirl) and dual trapeze made my heart sing, dip, dive, dance, and stop beating altogether. The look and sound of the show was amazing. The opening dance between the four elements, with the soaring, ethereal singing, actually made me cry. (Not my first tears at a Cirque show. I cried when I saw Banquine in Quidam. It just says everything about life in five amazing minutes.) I loved its hopeful, ‘we’re-all-in-this-together’ message. It’s not Quidam. It won’t top Quidam. But it’ll feed my Cirque addiction for another year, and that is enough.

Dream, work, play… June 11, 2008

Posted by dolorosa12 in childhood, fangirl, memories, work.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment

Sometimes I simply adore the kids at the school. Today, not only did I have the most amusingly trippy conversation ever with one of them, but a bunch of the others watched the Buffy film. I shall give further details about both occurences further, but first, let me relate a truly bizarre dream I had last night.

The dream took the form of a home-video memory, and, at the time, seemed totally plausible as something of which I’d have a video record. I was six, and, with two-year-old Mimi, cycling around Lake Burley Griffin. Nothing unusual about this, except that I didn’t learn to cycle without training wheels until I was seven, and Mimi certainly couldn’t ride a bike at two.

It was a hot summer Canberra day, and Commonwealth Park was full of people out enjoying the sunshine, dressed in a fetching array of early ’90s clothes: men in stubbies, kids in leggings and big, fluoro T. shirts and women with crazy, permed hairstyles. Some people were running through the sprinklers, a throw-back to a less water-conscious time.

All of a sudden we met up with E., an old family friend who is my age and whom I’ve known since the first day I moved to Canberra (when I was three). She was dressed in her school uniform, riding a small bike through the water of the Lake, to school. This wouldn’t work for many reasons. Firstly, she was dressed in the Red Hill Primary uniform – but at six, she still attended Griffith Primary, which only closed down when we were eight. Secondly, she lived on the same side of the Lake to her school. Dream logic ftw, huh?

Finally, Mimi and I arrived back at our old house in Forrest, which, inexplicably had a bush shower in the kitchen. Umm, no it didn’t. All the time, I was an observer of this dream, rather than a participant, as if I were watching it on TV. It was a very strange experience.

Part II
My trippy conversation with one of the kids at the school was as follows:
Me: Be more careful when you run around with hula hoops, please.
Kid: I am careful, but my master makes me bad.
Me: Your master?
Kid (climbing up on to the equipment): Yeah, I have a master. He’s invisible and sits on my back and tells me to be evil. You can’t see him.
Me: Can I speak to him?
Kid: No. He only speaks to me.
Me: So, what’s his name? If I speak to him, can you tell him what I say?
Kid: His name is Aslan, but he’s not the Aslan from Narnia.
Me: Hi Aslan. It would be very helpful if you could tell (kid) to be good, not evil.
Kid (thinking): He says that if you want to speak to him you need to fight a big battle and face a challenge. And then, the reward would be DEATH.

I gave up, bemused and amused.

I am further amused at the older kids’ obsession with my own favourite TV series (and the seminal show of my teenage years), Buffy The Vampire Slayer. They’d been nagging for ages to bring in a DVD and watch it on a rainy day, but we always said that because the series is rated M, they’d not be allowed to watch it at school. But they somehow figured out that the 1992 movie was rated PG, and today they brought it in to watch. Unfortunately, I was not in charge of this activity, and so am still a Buffy movie virgin, alas. Since Joss (AKA God) himself has described the film as an imperfect rendering of his perfect Buffy vision, however, I suppose it’s not too much of a loss to me to have missed out yet again.

It did, however, remind me of when the film came out. In Australia, it came out when I was nine, in 1994. I was not allowed to watch it (and, indeed, wasn’t all that interested), but several of my friends (whom I’ll assign random initials) were. My best friend at the time, S., and two boys in my year, E. and K., were utterly obsessed, and spent their days playing Buffy, carrying around smelly garlic and sticks stuck together to form crosses. S. also persuaded her mother to let her raid the herb cabinet, and packed our shared desk with packets of ostensibly vampire-repelling herbs. Good times.

When I grow up… May 22, 2008

Posted by dolorosa12 in childhood, memories.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

When I was two, I was going to be a fairy, angel or animal when I grew up. I’m not sure how I could’ve trained for these positions, but it’s obvious that logic has never been my strong point.
When I was six, I was going to be a hairdresser (‘because I like getting my hair done’) by day and a ballerina (‘in the Royal Ballet Company’) by night. Well…I was certainly enthusiastic.
When I was seven I wanted to be a palaeontologist or an astronaut. Mainly because I was utterly obsessed with dinosaurs and outer space. I had romantic visions of myself finding the bones of a muttaburrasaurus perfectly preserved in the Australian soil, or perhaps spinning around in a gravity-less spaceship somewhere between Mercury and Venus. The future spread out before me in a perfect, glorious mixture of archaeological digs and trips to collect moonrocks.
When I was nine I was going to be a writer and illustrator of ghost stories when I grew. I practiced so that when I was a grown-up I’d be really good at writing. The protagonists were always shy, lonely, misunderstood girls who hung out a lot in graveyards and found their perfect friends among the dead.
When I was 10 I was going to be a diplomat or travel-writer when I grew up. It didn’t occur to me that my pathological fear and hatred of change might be a problem for this particular career choice.
When I was 12 I was going to be a translator of Japanese into English. Demo watashi wa nihongo wo oboitenai yo. (And that’s probably not even correct!)
When I was 18 I was going to be a journalist when I grew up. Never mind my parents’ horror. After all, I was going to be a print journalist and steer clear of their stamping ground of the ABC!
When I was 22 I was going to be a brilliant academic, making ground-breaking discoveries in the mediæval Celtic field. When I grew up, I would sit in a room, reading books, writing papers and passing on my knowledge to a small, eccentric band of students, who, like me, loved Celtic Studies because it removed them from the ordinary, day-to-day tedium of the everyday world.
When I grow up…
When I grow up…
I want to be…
I want to be?
I want to?
I want?
I?

Autumn daydreams and segues April 21, 2008

Posted by dolorosa12 in books, childhood, fangirl, memories, subbing.
Tags: , , , , , ,
2 comments

Sometimes I’m very in love with Aaron Timms, the Sydney Morning Herald columnist. I’ve been meaning to post this gem from his Friday column for some time. It appeals to my subs’ humour. It’s about ‘Aussie bands to watch’. My favourite is Subeditors: ‘A classic indie rock four-piece operating off a set of MacBooks in a garage out the back of Erskinville, Subeditors see it as their mission to cover the same lyrical territory as their British counterparts, Editors, only in a far more succinct fashion – removing commas, semicolons and excess verbiage wherever they appear. Their work covering Editors’ recent single Smokers Outside The Hospital Doors, in which they changed the line “The saddest thing that I’d ever seen/ Were smokers outside the hospital doors” to the far punchier “The saddest thing/ Was smokers” was met with critical acclaim.’ I laughed and laughed. So true. *attacks semicolons with a pair of scissors*

In other news this Facebook group cracks me up. I may have to join it. There really is a Facebook group for everything. I sometimes wonder what (pedantic, obsessive, bored) people did before the Internet. I really do.

Last night Mum, Mimi and I reminisced for about an hour about the picture books we read when Mimi and I were children. We really did have some awesome ones, and kept them all; they are slowly gathering dust on the bookshelves of my bedroom. There isn’t room to contain my gushings about these brilliant books (Graeme Base, Alison Lester, Tomie de Paola, Orlando the Marmalade Cat series, the Fox books, the Frances books, the Happy Families books Maira Kalman, Mystery on the Docks etc etc etc etc), so I will confine myself to one recollection. Book Week was a standard feature of my youth. Once a year, to coincide with the CBCA Book of the Year Awards, our school would hold a Book Day, when all the children had to dress up as book characters. One year, two of the short-listed books were Magic Beach by Alison Lester and Greetings from Sandy Beach by Bob Graham. They were both typical Australian picture books of the ’90s. Sandy Beach is utterly hilarious, and if you haven’t read it, you really should. It still cracks me up. It’s just about a girl’s weekend trip to the beach, and the randoms she meets along the way (including a busload of school kids and a bikie gang).

To cut a long story short, that year, our teachers said that if we had no inspiration for our Book Week costumes to dress up as something from one of the two ‘beach’ books. This of course meant that every boy in my class was dressed as a bikie. For seven years, Book Week dress-up day was the same. Some kids’ parents would go to enormous trouble, and the children would be wearing hand-made, intricate, over-the-top costumes good enough for a stage-play. Other parents would ensure their kids went as a character who could wear jeans and a white t. shirt. There would always be at least two kids who forgot and came in school uniform, and at least one boy inexplicably dressed as Batman or Spiderman in every class.

Such is the strength of this and other such memories that when I started talking about it with Mum and Mim, I began laughing hysterically. The laughter soon turned to tears.

It’s very hard to explain why such things still have the power to move me to tears. My feelings are reflected more widely, I think, in the fact that (for example), the largest Australia-based Facebook group (yes, there I go again) is I grew up in Australia in the 90s. It’s partly because I’ve always had a very strong sense of the passage of time, and feel every second of my childhood slipping away from me. But it’s also because I feel the past so strongly. I can remember exactly what it felt like, and yet it sometimes feels like I am looking at a movie of someone else’s life. Who was that solemn little girl who spent her mornings before school dancing to The Little Mermaid soundtrack, her afternoons climbing the magnolia and dogwood trees of her front garden and the evenings pretending to be the protagonist of A Little Princess? Who was that girl who could recite Yikes! by Alison Lester off by heart? Who set up obstacle course for her dolls and believed her herb garden was the grave of a teenager called Mary whose ghost haunted her house?

The world was in some ways so much brighter then. Every small thing mattered more. I don’t regret for a day that I’ve grown up, but sometimes I wish there was a more fluid link between the past and present. I’d like to drop in on seven-year-old, four-year-old, 10-year-old Ronni (or Veronica, as she was known then), to be her for a day or two.

It’s summed up, for me, in a poem I wrote a few years ago (the phrasing of it makes me wince, but the idea I’m trying to get across now is there):
When a catoniasta bush was as big as the whole world
And no, that is not a misprint:
I do not mean seemed, but was.
When the two of us sat among the whippy branches
Which arched over our heads, laden
With an infinitude of small red berries
– ‘They aren’t for eating’ –
our mothers said, worriedly
– ‘they’re poisonous’ –
‘But if the birds can eat them, why can’t we?’
We asked, with the logic of six-year-olds.
It made perfect sense.
While the branches and leaves transformed around us
Into a pirate ship
And no-one ever worried that we were so close
To the road, because
It was obvious we were too enthralled to move.

How infallible is your memory?
How infallible is a memory?
All I can say is, that although we could barely read
On that day
Never again will we see the world so clearly.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started