User talk:Scooter20

Commons:WikiProject Romania

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 15:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re: == File source is not properly indicated: File:Mars Earth Comparison.png ==

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Perfect, you were faster than me fixing it Lobo (howl?) 11:35, 30 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Subject: File talk:Europe Completed Motorways Dec 2012.png inaccurate

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Subject: File talk:Europe Completed Motorways Dec 2012.png inaccurate

This map is inaccurate as it does not show the full extent of the motorway network in Ireland as of December 2012.

Based on sources such as Wikipedia, Open Street Map (http://www.openstreetmap.org/),Google Maps, Ireland's National Road Authority's website (www.nra.ie), offline resources (AA Road Map of Great Britain and Ireland, 2012 edition), and personal knowledge, the map relating to Ireland is incorrect.

The map does not show the M7 as complete (http://www.nra.ie/News/PressReleases/htmltext,17732,en.html)

The map does not show the M8 as complete (http://www.nra.ie/News/PressReleases/htmltext,17186,en.html)

The map does not show the M9 as complete (http://www.nra.ie/News/PressReleases/htmltext,17283,en.html)

The map does not show the M4 (http://www.nra.ie/GeneralTollingInformation/TollCharges/M4Kilcock-Enfield-Kinnegad/)

The map does not show a portion of the M18 from near Crusheen, Co. Clare (north of Ennis) to north of Gort (http://www.nra.ie/News/PressReleases/htmltext,17643,en.html).

I see, I'll try to correct it whenever I'll have some time! Scooter20 (talk) 21:48, 28 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi, the last Version of the map is wrong concerning Croatia, you included Motorways which are in construction or ony planned right now (almost all changes). The previous version was better. Also i want to question, if Expressways are added or not. I thin it is very complicated to decide if this should be done or not. Once you start to include some its about the criteria. Better dont include any at all. For example there are non in germany included but some in french Bretagne and in Croatia of course. Some expressways have smaller lanes, some are only 2+1... But maybe it is a good idea to decide this for a whole country. In poland the newbuilt expressways have the same standard, so its more political reason. In hungary its evolving, right now all are2+2 but smaller. I would ask to keep it as simple as possible. 2003:E3:3F22:3E00:B534:B4FB:6A78:C096 17:07, 7 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, Scooter. Can I ask for your help for adding the majority areas of Romanian and Aromanian on that map? It's almost complete but missing Romanian area in Serbia.--Nonemansland (talk) 04:49, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'll try to take a look this evening. Thanks!--Scooter20 (talk) 07:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Done! --Scooter20 (talk) 21:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! Could you help with Ukrainian? Do you think it is a plurality in areas of southern Russia? It is in northern Moldova- File:Harta_etnica_a_Republicii_Moldova_-_2004.jpg File:Languages_in_Moldova_2006.jpg. Nonemansland (talk) 08:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

I'll try to take a look this weekend. Yeah, Moldova needs some clean-up as Russian and Ukrainian speaking minorities are not really shown on the map. --Scooter20 (talk) 09:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:RO TM - Iulius Mall - United Business Centre.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:RO TM - Iulius Mall - United Business Centre.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:RO TM - Iulius Mall - United Business Centre.…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Turbojet (talk) 19:56, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:RO TM Centrul Bancar.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:RO TM Centrul Bancar.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:RO TM Centrul Bancar.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Turbojet (talk) 19:57, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:RO TM City Business Centre.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:RO TM City Business Centre.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:RO TM City Business Centre.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Turbojet (talk) 19:57, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:RO TM OpenVille UBC3.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:RO TM OpenVille UBC3.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:RO TM OpenVille UBC3.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Turbojet (talk) 19:58, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

File copyright status

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 17:04, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:MagyarsOutsideHungary.png

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:MagyarsOutsideHungary.png has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:MagyarsOutsideHungary.png

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Fæ (talk) 09:20, 29 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:MagyarsOutsideHungary.png

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ русский ∙ slovenščina ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:MagyarsOutsideHungary.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Fæ (talk) 18:53, 12 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:MagyarsOutsideHungary.png

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆） ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:MagyarsOutsideHungary.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Fæ (talk) 21:47, 12 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:MagyarsOutsideHungary.png

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:MagyarsOutsideHungary.png has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:MagyarsOutsideHungary.png

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

rubin16 (talk) 21:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Update request

Latest comment: 1 year ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, Scooter20.

Can you update File:DistributionOfAzerbaijanisInCaucasusAndME.png, by removing the color and label for the now defunct de facto Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh?

Armenian is no longer spoken over a territory in Azerbaijan since 2023, after the flight of Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians and the collapse of the breakaway Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh (Republic of Artsakh) in 2023.

Yours sincerely, Oirattas (talk) 08:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Updated! Scooter20 (talk) 09:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much!

One last request, if you are willing to update it:

Can you update File:Արցախի բարբառը.png by coloring the whole area where the Karabakh dialect of Armenian was spoken on the territory of Azerbaijan in light green? Can you show the former border of the Nagorno-Karabakh Oblast in one color? Oirattas (talk) 09:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please ask the author of that image to do it. Thanks! Scooter20 (talk) 10:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

OK. I will ask. Thank you again. Oirattas (talk) 21:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Scooter20.

Can you update these SVG and PNG maps below, after the ethnic cleansing of all Armenians from Nagorno-Karabakh which resulted in Armenian no longer being spoken over a territory in Azerbaijan since 2023:

File:AzerbaijaniSpeakingAreasMap.jpg

File:Azerbaijanians in Caucasus.jpg

File:Schbrooche vo Europa.png

File:Language Families in Europe (en).svg

File:Middle east.svg

File:The distribution of the Turkic languages.png

File:Caucasus-ethnic volkengroepen.png

Yours sincerely, Oirattas (talk) 00:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Like I said last time, please contact the respective owners of those images for the required changes.

I am no longer active on Wikipedia and do not have time to make all those changes. Thanks Scooter20 (talk) 07:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I see. Sorry. None of these users are active, that is why I asked you. Oirattas (talk) 23:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:DistributionOfArmeniansInTheCaucasusRegion.png

Latest comment: 11 months ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Hi.

Can you update File:DistributionOfArmeniansInTheCaucasusRegion.png which you created, by painting all of Nagorno-Karabakh without its de facto borders in orange, like the other orange areas in the rest of Azerbaijan? After the fall of the de facto Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh and the ethnic cleansing of all Armenians from Nagorno-Karabakh in September-October 2023, no Armenians live in that region anymore and only a few dozen Armenians live in Azerbaijan as a whole.

Another user did request and update for File:DistributionOfAzerbaijanisInCaucasusAndME.png, which you updated.

Kindest regards, Moroike (talk) 08:26, 17 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, updated the Nagorno Karabakh Armenian population from present day to historical, since the map shows historical populations as well. Scooter20 (talk) 09:33, 17 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much for the update. Moroike (talk) 09:59, 17 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

No problem Scooter20 (talk) 10:05, 17 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi.

Can you update File:DistributionOfArmeniansInTheCaucasus.png and its Korean language version File:캅카스의아르메니아인분포도.png for precisely the same reason, by removing the border of the former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast and painting the area in orange?

Kindest regards, Moroike (talk) 18:49, 18 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done Scooter20 (talk) 07:24, 19 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much for the updates and I wish you a Happy New Year. Moroike (talk) 10:06, 19 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

No problem! Happy New Year! Scooter20 (talk) 10:21, 19 December 2024 (UTC)Reply