User talk:Hornstrandir1/Archive 4
| This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Misuse of my pseudonym
Someone just misused my pseudonym to identify mushrooms. I have no knowledge at all about this topic. (see: File talk:Recherche de champignons.JPG ) Hornstrandir1 (talk) 19:24, 16 OctoHornstrandir1 (talk)ber 2022 (UTC)
- Hello. According to the history, user Hornstrandir1 added category "Agaricus bisporus" to File:Recherche de champignons.JPG. But that category is completely wrong, as I explained on the talk page, and if I understand correctly, you don't disagree with me. I pinged you to inform you that I was changing the category, because the history indicates that it was you who decided on category "Agaricus bisporus". If you can't understand how the category change could have happened from your account, this seems like a security issue. Perhaps you should change your password. Best wishes, Strobilomyces (talk) 17:35, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment. I really don't nor won't mix up with any mushrooms - not my interest span - and would never add categories concerning this subject. So to change my password could be a good idea. - And thank you for finding this problem.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 18:22, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Renommage de communes françaises
Bonjour Hornstrandir. Renommer une catégorie de commune française sur Commons n'est pas suffisant. Pour la Category:Grives transformée en Category:Grives (Dordogne), Il faut également penser à corriger les liens sur Wikipédia [1] et sur Wikidata [2] et [3]. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 17:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Merci pour votre commentaire. Je vais changer cela aussi sur Wikipédia etc.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 22:05, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Sur Commons, c'est l'anglais qui est la langue principale qui peut donc produire des homonymes avec le français ; sur Wikipédia en français, il n'existe qu'un article s'appelant Grives ; il est donc inutile de le renommer en Grives (Dordogne) (article inexistant). Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 11:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Merci de m'avoir informé. J'avais pas pensé à cela.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 12:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Sur Commons, c'est l'anglais qui est la langue principale qui peut donc produire des homonymes avec le français ; sur Wikipédia en français, il n'existe qu'un article s'appelant Grives ; il est donc inutile de le renommer en Grives (Dordogne) (article inexistant). Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 11:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Attention aux apparences
Bonjour Hornstrandir1. Tu as ajouté sur la category:Forêt de Lanmary les cartes des ZNIEFF des communes d'Escoire, de Cornille, de Bassillac-et-Auberoche et d'Antonne-et-Trigonant. Si cette dernière est correcte, les trois autres ne sont pas concernées. Sur ces cartes, on voit effectivement apparaître la mention « Forêt domaniale de Lanmary et alentours » mais elles sont extérieures à cette ZNIEFF. Si tu regardes l'article Forêt domaniale de Lanmary et alentours que j'ai créé, tu pourras t'en apercevoir. J'ai par contre ajouté à la category:Forêt de Lanmary les cartes des ZNIEFF de trois communes vraiment concernées : Trélissac, Sarliac-sur-l'Isle et Sorges et Ligueux en Périgord (ces deux dernières marginalement).
Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 16:26, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Merci, Père Igor. Je vais penser à cela dans l'avenir.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 17:17, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Categories
Thanks Hornstrandir1 for adding Categories to all my files. I appreciate :-) Regards Olga Ernst (talk) 11:16, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Ice wedge?

Excuse me, but where is the ice wedge in this picture? Is there something on the surface which makes ice wedges in the soil obvious to the observer above? GerritR (talk) 16:28, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, the "mini-hills" in meadows etc.. And at these heights, there would be some. In Iceland, they are even to be found down in the valleys and on the plains. (See eg. File:PanoramaIcelandicLandscape5.jpg, in the foreground.) They are a consequence of freeze-thaw-action.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 22:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Renommage Category by city par by commune
Bonjour Hornstrandir1. J'ai vu que vous avez modifié plusieurs catégories en remplaçant by city par by commune (Category:Nature of Meurthe-et-Moselle by commune, Category:Nature of Manche by commune). Ces renommages posent problème avec la catégorie mère Category:Nature by city by country. Une telle modification impacte des centaines de catégories. Ces changements ont été discuté avec la communauté ? Merci
. Cordialement Tylwyth Eldar (talk) 10:17, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Des petits villages et des hameaux ne peuvent pas être des "cities". Pourquoi est-ce qu'on n'utilise pas le mot "municipality"? C'est une traduction correcte de "commune", et en plus il contiendrait aussi les paysages rurales qui ne peuvent pas faire partie d'une "city", mais bien sûr d'une commune/municpality.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 10:22, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Le souci est que l'on tombe dans la surcatégorisation. En outre, "Commune" est un terme pour une subdivision purement française, alors que les catégories sont en anglais pour l'ensemble des pays. Avec le nombre de catégories potentiellement impactées, pour un tel changement, vous devriez en discuter avec les autres utilisateurs sur le Bistro. En attendant de trouver un accord, je vais corriger. Cordialement Tylwyth Eldar (talk) 10:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Je comprends.
- Mais d'autre part, "department/département" est aussi un terme administratif utilisé seulement en France qu'on a accepté quand même. Et aussi, si on utilisait "municipality", tout le monde pourrait comprendre et le contenu serait beaucoup plus en accordance avec la désignation des catégories.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 11:15, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Le souci est que l'on tombe dans la surcatégorisation. En outre, "Commune" est un terme pour une subdivision purement française, alors que les catégories sont en anglais pour l'ensemble des pays. Avec le nombre de catégories potentiellement impactées, pour un tel changement, vous devriez en discuter avec les autres utilisateurs sur le Bistro. En attendant de trouver un accord, je vais corriger. Cordialement Tylwyth Eldar (talk) 10:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Walker Lane (geology)
Category:Walker Lane (geology)
I don’t understand this category at all. It seems to be a misspelling of Category:Walker Lake (Nevada) and none of the files associated with it are near Walker Lake or mention Walker Lane. Raquel Baranow (talk) 23:16, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, I see it now: Walker Lane. Raquel Baranow (talk) 23:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
|
Anticlines (petroleum traps) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 10:50, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Science in former countries
These four categories you just created are oddly named:
- Category:Science in former countries (do you really mean Category:Science by former country)
- Category:Science in former countries of Europe (should be Category:Science in Europe by former country?)
- Category:Science in former countries of Asia (should be Category:Science in Asia by former country?)
- Category:Science in former countries of Africa (should be Category:Science in Africa by former country?)
If they are renamed as suggested, the template should recognize and sort them properly, but the current names are not going to work. Thanks! Josh (talk) 23:49, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- This could work. I just began to sort it out and saw that it was a bigger issue, so I intended first to discuss it with the community.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 08:12, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
|
Category:17th_century_maps_of_Reims has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Enyavar (talk) 16:15, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)