Jump to content

Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2025/10/21

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 21st, 2025
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it has me and my friend's faces and i wish for them to not be seen on the internet Hiimontv (talk) 00:17, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:22, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it has me and my friend's faces and i wish for them to not be seen on the internet Hiimontv (talk) 00:18, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:22, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The blurriness of this photo makes it not educationally useful according to Wikimedia Commons' scope. Ed [talk] [OMT] 03:37, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, nonsense upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:23, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The blurriness of this photo makes it not educationally useful according to Wikimedia Commons' scope. Ed [talk] [OMT] 03:37, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, nonsense upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:23, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I personay uploaded this file, there was a revised version which is quality-wise better so I ask for the deletion of this one Despechi.ro (talk) 07:21, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:31, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out-of-scope image with minimal educational value, most likely uploaded with the intention of vandalism due to its filename/description referencing the w:2015 New Taipei water park fire . Matt Zhuang (talk) 05:32, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Vandalism-only photo. Sakurase (talk) 06:49, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Uploader blocked indef. --Achim55 (talk) 10:08, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur dans le titre JackyM59 (talk) 11:22, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:23, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PERSONAL 178.216.218.77 11:58, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Herby talk thyme 12:13, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete original. If not copyvio separate it. 186.40.38.190 01:34, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted old version: per nom. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:08, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NOTUSED 178.216.218.77 12:05, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Herby talk thyme 12:11, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot Joanbanjo (talk) 00:13, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 14:20, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The music in the video ("Danger Zone" by Kenny Loggins) is copyrighted. FallingGravity (talk) 03:31, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - I've stripped the audio track. Closing admin: please delete the first revision. Omphalographer (talk) 03:38, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: version with copyright audio removed; Deleted earlier verison with violation. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:33, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia. Ox1997cow (talk) 18:57, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia A1Cafel (talk) 10:24, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: again - same image deleted earlier, with "own work" claim by different user!. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:40, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is outdated Fkimmel (talk) 13:13, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:01, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is outdated Fkimmel (talk) 08:12, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Still no valid reason for deletion. Adtonko (talk) 15:23, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - We don't delete logos just because they're outdated; we just replace their use with the new logo, where applicable. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:19, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm uploader and i want delete this picture Vhnguyen98 (talk) 15:34, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 16:25, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake 17mdnasim89 (talk) 15:36, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:38, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is an editen image which aims to mock on Jeannette Jara's look. Not a real one. 186.104.190.7 20:24, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD G3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:16, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 17mdnasim89 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal images, out of scope, blurry

Envagyokabela (talk) 21:36, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment one more already nominated for deletion by uploader: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:A_beautiful_face_(59340).jpg Envagyokabela (talk) 21:39, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:38, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of file:Old Mars Logo.svg Bruce The Deus (talk) 21:51, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + converted to redirect. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:19, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:49, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:16, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my personal image. This was uploaded here without my permission from my social media. I no longer want it to exist on Wikimedia Commons. Please delete it permanently. Thank you. IndianHistoryLover99 (talk) 08:02, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: You uploaded it yourself - please don't lie in DRs - but it qualifies for CSD F10 regardless. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:17, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my personal image. This was uploaded here without my permission from my social media. I no longer want it to exist on Wikimedia Commons. Please delete it permanently. Thank you. IndianHistoryLover99 (talk) 16:52, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Duplicate listing. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:17, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 17:27, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:18, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Do not need it GlobeTrotter71 (talk) 17:57, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD G7. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:18, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Afsalgado (talk) 20:53, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD G7. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Carregado por erro Judite Pedro (talk) 22:28, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD G7. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:25, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry I accidentally uploaded duplicate image, pls make redirect. 6D (talk) 14:15, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:25, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry I accidentally uploaded duplicate image, pls make redirect. 6D (talk) 14:16, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:24, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry I accidentally uploaded duplicate image, pls make redirect. 6D (talk) 14:17, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:24, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 6D (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Sorry I accidentally uploaded duplicate image, pls make redirect.

6D (talk) 14:23, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most, per nomination, kept a few which were not exact duplicates (cropped on Flickr). --Rosenzweig τ 11:07, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 6D (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Sorry I accidentally uploaded duplicate image, pls make redirect.

6D (talk) 14:55, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most, per nomination, kept quite a number which are not duplicates as far as I could determine. --Rosenzweig τ 13:43, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I again wrongly upload this picture so delete this pic Ani Vincent (talk) 15:38, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I again wrongly upload this picture so delete this pic Ani Vincent (talk) 15:35, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:57, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i forgot to click rigid body button and show the panel for demostration, need to upload a new one JZVFX (talk) 16:20, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:55, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded the incorrect photo edit file Husskeyy (talk) 17:50, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:54, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Vux (talk) 19:14, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ich verstehe das Procedere mit den Eintragungen und Meldunge nicht so ganz. Der Lizenezeintrag wurde von mir vermutlich wegen des ungewohnten Uploadablaufs übersehen. Danke für den Hinweis, jetzt steht eine Lizenz drin. --Vux (talk) 19:18, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: has a license tag now. --Rosenzweig τ 13:54, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mistake from me. I uploaded this file but didn't want to go through the all process of upload. Lucretz27 (talk) 19:23, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:53, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by mistake Joey52 (talk) 19:36, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:52, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I HJAMESBERGLEN updloaded this image in error. This is NOT 585 and 585 High Road N17. Subsequently I uploaded the correct image. I therefore request deletion. Hjamesberglen (talk) 19:53, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:50, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mala calidad de la imagen Marraski (talk) 21:10, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:52, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i dont want it up anymore Trenton gill-shaw (talk) 23:09, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:51, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensing is wrong ANTbook365 (talk) 23:24, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:51, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the US for art. Also, see COM:GRAFFITI

Elisfkc (talk) 21:11, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for bringing these back up. These were among the first uploads I ever made. Sometime afterward, I became aware that there may be copyright issues, so I asked about it at Commons talk:Copyright rules by subject matter. Both the existing lengthy discussion and response from my inquiry suggested the files were safe. Perhaps consensus has since changed? If it means anything, Banksy is pseudonymous and based in England, where I understand they have freedom of panorama (so it would be odd to take legal action on a few Commons images taken in the US, but be OK with those in the UK, is my thinking). Meanwhile, Category:Street art in the United States is full of close-up images of graffiti. It would be a shame to delete the more notable imagery, created by one of the world's most famous street artists, devaluing the articles and documentation of his work (which often is quickly seized, destroyed, or defaced). However obviously I'll bow to policy and consensus :) and I understand we're trying to be cautious. Regards MusikAnimal talk 11:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: deleted a few that seemed to be legal (sculptures, paintings), kept the rest per COM:GRAFFITI. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:29, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artwork in the US. Notice that some of the files were kept in a previous DR in 2018 citing COM:GRAFFITI. Notice that the current consensus is to only old graffiti that didn't follow copyright formalities (missing notice, no registration, etc), not applicable to these artworks.

Günther Frager (talk) 13:20, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:47, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in the UK.

Günther Frager (talk) 13:08, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that means the commons is going to lose my entire my banksy photoset, including those that I haven't yet uploaded from https://www.flickr.com/gp/steve_l/92E549C36j
I think this unfortunate as not only is this a cultural loss of the commons, as many of these have been destroyed-deliberately of accidentally- nobody will be able to make their own personal copies, even if they wanted to.
I *may* publish some on Wikipedia directly, without any CC license SteveLoughran (talk) 20:59, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can I also highlight that Getty Images has no issues charging for its copy of murals by Banksy, Hazard One and others. Its lawyers clearly have no issues here
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0l7p1j00j1o SteveLoughran (talk) 11:50, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@SteveLoughran: please read the precautionary principle. Günther Frager (talk) 13:50, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:45, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama for 2D works in the UK.

Günther Frager (talk) 13:27, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in the UK.

Günther Frager (talk) 13:47, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:43, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author died in 1958, Undelete in 2029. Abzeronow (talk) 02:19, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Greek painting, no infomation provided by uploader on whether this is a PD artwork or modern. Abzeronow (talk) 02:38, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-res image of text formula, that also contains proofreading markup DMacks (talk) 07:16, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:32, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in the UK. Günther Frager (talk) 07:47, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:32, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in the UK. Günther Frager (talk) 07:48, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:32, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in the UK. Günther Frager (talk) 07:49, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:32, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:04, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:32, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia A1Cafel (talk) 10:24, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:32, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia A1Cafel (talk) 10:25, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:32, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia A1Cafel (talk) 10:26, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:32, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia A1Cafel (talk) 10:26, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:32, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 10:29, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 10:33, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 10:34, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 10:39, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:01, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small web-resolution pic; all of user's others uploads were deleted as copyright violations earlier. In use in uploader's es:w user subpage. User only active on Commons and es:w for a few days in October 2019. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:21, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was not taken by Buenos Aires government so they cannot grant any license. The uncropped photo is available an hundred of online newspapers like here, here, here, etc. They claim it is a press photo provided by the club itself. Günther Frager (talk) 17:36, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DW. The Government of Buenos Aires took the photo and released under a free license, but they are not the copyright holders of the mural that was created in 2000 (see signature). Günther Frager (talk) 18:09, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clipping apparently from 1951 newspaper; original needs to be shown to be out of copyright for free license. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:26, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused uncat photo of unidentified people in unidentified place in unidentified context. Uploader's description: "this is very beautiful image" - you may think so, but that does not make it COM:SCOPE. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:31, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious date and license claims. Might or might not be PD for some reason, but needs factual information to determine. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:37, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious date and license claims. Might or might not be PD for some reason, but needs factual information to determine. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:39, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious date and license claims. Might or might not be PD for some reason, but needs factual information to determine. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:39, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source link dead. Failed license review. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 20:13, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear scope and copyright status but in use GPSLeo (talk) 20:39, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Attributed to User:漢浩 who is indefinitely blocked for copyright violation. Unlikely license. Dead link -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 20:43, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused low quality map GPSLeo (talk) 20:44, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source info; not a 2019 photo of someone who died in 1956 Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:03, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, photo of newspaper of unknown copyright status. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:21, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:23, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OOS by non-contributor Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:32, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused mundane image with superimposed text caption, looks like screen grab from video? Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:33, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW (Note, user's only upload; currently in use.) Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:37, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image, work by Fritz Kern at the collections of the Austrian National Library. Kern died in 2005 (undeletion in 2076). 77.224.67.79 15:51, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:37, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

الغاء صورة هلال محمد الشملان (talk) 18:37, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

الغاء صورة 212.34.22.29 19:47, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 08:39, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 15:35, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 15:38, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:29, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 15:42, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 15:46, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 15:48, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 15:55, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:32, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 15:57, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:26, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 16:00, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:26, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 16:02, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:25, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 16:15, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:24, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:22, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 16:21, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:22, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 16:22, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:21, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 16:29, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 16:35, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 16:37, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:18, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 16:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 16:47, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 16:49, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:15, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 16:53, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:15, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 16:55, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:14, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 16:57, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:13, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 17:02, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:13, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same rationale as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chateau en Suède, texte de Françoise Sagan - btv1b106020000. These negatives were uploaded to Gallica in 2022 and never had a "Public Domain" denomination (see discussion in the linked DR). The rights field states restricted use (convention BnF-ADM-2022-055028-01). The author is the French photographer Roger Pic who died in 2001 and therefore are protected in France until the end of 2071.

Günther Frager (talk) 17:10, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:09, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has a tag from the copyright holder but you've uploaded it as your own work. Kindly provide the necessary licence/permission to contest this deletion. Af265 (talk) 02:09, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:32, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Face swap of a Chinese meme, with no educational value and Commons:BLP concern. Tim (talk) 02:33, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:32, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of a TV displaying a stillframe from footage owned by Antena 1 TV station.  —Andreitalk 08:37, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:27, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover  —Andreitalk 08:38, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:26, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of posters. Images are not vintage but show modern heritage-era imagery. Herbert Ortner (talk) 09:46, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:26, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover. No proof of free license. Herbert Ortner (talk) 09:48, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:25, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover. No proof of free license. Herbert Ortner (talk) 09:48, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:25, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - © sahrahkaiserfoto - would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 12:13, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:24, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Drakosh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Old photo made in 50s, can not be original own work of 2025. Author? Source? Copyright status? These are things we might be able to find out during a regular deletion request. It also gives the uploader the opportunity to respond. זיו「Ziv」For love letters and other notes 13:52, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:24, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 16:04, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution photograph of an anonymized girl in bikini, rotated upon request of the uploader. Many better images available. No educational value. Lymantria (talk) 16:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom, low-res photo with unknown copyright status (FBMD in EXIF). Unknown if subject is notable as their face was covered, therefore only depicts a common subject (lady in bikini by a pool), hence only have minimal educational value (out of scope). Tvpuppy (talk) 22:37, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:18, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious date and license claims (not a 2019 photo of someone who died in 1957). Might or might not be PD for some reason, but needs factual information to determine. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:38, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair-use file from enwiki (MicahJohnson2014DMVphoto.jpg) edited by someone who thinks photoshop makes someone's else work theirs. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 22:29, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

using copyrighted images in Photoshop is a matter of copyright law and fair use. Fair use is a legal doctrine that allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission for purposes like criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research. In this case it's fair use. I edited out his shoulders, made the image black and white, removed the blue background, so the only thing that shows is his face. And I added it for the encyclopedia for the purpose of teaching. It's my work because I made it my own and therefore it's fair use. Kpop777 (talk) 23:02, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, but that would make it a derivative work, not "own work". Also, Commons is not supposed to host fair-use works anyway. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 23:08, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok fine I guess you can delete it Kpop777 (talk) 00:26, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:13, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Komalpreet Sarao (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: various unused images and screenshots about Aritzia.

Omphalographer (talk) 23:18, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:12, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted photo Shoot for the Stars (talk) 23:29, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:11, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted phot Shoot for the Stars (talk) 23:31, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:11, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no reason for it to be existing OathOn (talk) 00:24, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: empty file. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:57, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - We've already deleted over 100 unused, fictional Eurovision hearts, but these haven't been nominated yet. (See Commons:Deletion requests/Eurovision heart flags of discontinued flags)

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:57, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:59, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal files used only in a user subpage of the uploader's. We've already deleted hundreds of fictional Eurovision hearts (see Commons:Deletion requests/Eurovision heart flags of discontinued flags et al).

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:02, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep it’s now used in a Italy map (Eurovision) Teke2019 (talk) 22:15, 24 October 2025 (UTC) Blocked sock. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:58, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment, technically it is not COM:INUSE since they are only used in user pages. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 22:45, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:00, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The poster is PD in the USA, but likely not in the UK. In the UK, film posters copyright expires 70 years after authors death. EnDeeDoubleYou (talk) 02:19, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@EnDeeDoubleYou: The author is unknown, meaning that it is instead 70 years after publication.
ANOTHERWlKlPEDlAN wɑit thɑt’s ɑ typo 22:37, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per ANOTHERWlKlPEDlAN. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:11, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorer spacing and less-standard font for chemical structures compared to File:Benzoldiazonium cation Structural Formula V2.svg. Not sure if there's value to this unusually-colored style at all, but at least we can have a better rather than worse of it. DMacks (talk) 05:24, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 01:18, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PERSONAL 178.216.218.77 11:56, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep, in use at pl:Wikipedysta:Habbinbirday/brudnopis, therefore in scope. No valid reason for deletion.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:08, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:16, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non famous person Potatovodkaa (talk) 14:57, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Images of non-famous people can sometimes be in scope, but no indication this one is. Personal photo by person only active on pt:w for 1 week back in early June. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:15, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-copyright free image Imdeadinside12 (talk) 15:53, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

this was my bad i didn't fully understand the copyright rule i take full responsibility same for the jerod mayo pic as well Imdeadinside12 (talk) 17:50, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:12, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-copyright free image Imdeadinside12 (talk) 15:53, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:12, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake screenshot — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.218.18.234 (talk) 15:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:11, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake screenshot — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.218.18.234 (talk) 15:47, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:10, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is Bashir's official portrait, and it is nowhere near this user's work. It is a mere work of the Syrian government, and is protected under article 4 of the Syrian constitution. 🗽Freedoxm🗽 (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:41, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request for deletion of a photo of a Buddhist sacred scroll (Sutra) This image depicts a Buddhist sacred scroll (Sutra) whose photography and public display are not permitted according to the customs and religious regulations of many Buddhist temples. Such scrolls are considered deeply sacred and should not be photographed or shown publicly, except within a defined ritual context. Taking and publishing this image therefore violates the temple’s religious rules and house regulations. Out of respect for these religious practices and in the interest of cultural sensitivity, I kindly request that this image be removed. The relevant Buddhist community or temple representatives can confirm this policy if needed. Thank you for your understanding and consideration. Samuraiboy22 (talk) 21:40, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Moral rights protect individuals, not religions, and Commons hosts files that are in scope, even if some people find them objectionable. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:23, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:40, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request for deletion of a photo of a Buddhist sacred scroll (Sutra) This image depicts a Buddhist sacred scroll (Sutra) whose photography and public display are not permitted according to the customs and religious regulations of many Buddhist temples. Such scrolls are considered deeply sacred and should not be photographed or shown publicly, except within a defined ritual context. Taking and publishing this image therefore violates the temple’s religious rules and house regulations. Out of respect for these religious practices and in the interest of cultural sensitivity, I kindly request that this image be removed. The relevant Buddhist community or temple representatives can confirm this policy if needed. Thank you for your understanding and consideration. Samuraiboy22 (talk) 21:41, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Moral rights protect individuals, not religions, and Commons hosts files that are in scope, even if some people find them objectionable. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:23, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:40, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request for deletion of a photo of a Buddhist sacred scroll (Sutra) This image depicts a Buddhist sacred scroll (Sutra) whose photography and public display are not permitted according to the customs and religious regulations of many Buddhist temples. Such scrolls are considered deeply sacred and should not be photographed or shown publicly, except within a defined ritual context. Taking and publishing this image therefore violates the temple’s religious rules and house regulations. Out of respect for these religious practices and in the interest of cultural sensitivity, I kindly request that this image be removed. The relevant Buddhist community or temple representatives can confirm this policy if needed. Thank you for your understanding and consideration. Samuraiboy22 (talk) 21:41, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Moral rights protect individuals, not religions, and Commons hosts files that are in scope, even if some people find them objectionable. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:24, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:40, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request for deletion of a photo of a Buddhist sacred scroll (Sutra) This image depicts a Buddhist sacred scroll (Sutra) whose photography and public display are not permitted according to the customs and religious regulations of many Buddhist temples. Such scrolls are considered deeply sacred and should not be photographed or shown publicly, except within a defined ritual context. Taking and publishing this image therefore violates the temple’s religious rules and house regulations. Out of respect for these religious practices and in the interest of cultural sensitivity, I kindly request that this image be removed. The relevant Buddhist community or temple representatives can confirm this policy if needed. Thank you for your understanding and consideration. Samuraiboy22 (talk) 21:43, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Moral rights protect individuals, not religions, and Commons hosts files that are in scope, even if some people find them objectionable. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:24, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:39, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bjsd4india (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: dubious, self-promotional images about a political party of India. One of these images is explicitly tagged as having been generated by Google AI (File:Bjsd Flag.jpg), and several of the others show signs of having been generated or modified by AI image tools as well.

Omphalographer (talk) 23:17, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Party flags and logos are absolutely within scope. Promotional photos are more debatable. Fry1989 eh? 16:57, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They would be in scope if the political party were. I cannot find any reliable sources describing this as an active political party - one of the few references I could find was a Facebook page with eight followers, hosting the same generated images as were uploaded here. Omphalographer (talk) 17:50, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most per nomination, 1 Kept per Fry1989. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:38, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

شعار مختلف بلا أهمية  Mohammed Qays  🗣 15:47, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Infrogmation. --Rosenzweig τ 20:55, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contiene errores GaelVector (talk) 15:53, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per original edit, above, Special:Diff/1103084461, and COM:CSD#G7.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 23:47, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:13, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Polonia90

[edit]

This user has repeatedly uploaded content as their "own work" when all of them are absolutely not their work. I've left out File:William Heatley Wilder - Bishop Rese - 02.33 - Detroit Institute of Arts 2.jpg, which was retitled and fixed from "own work". Ed [talk] [OMT] 01:08, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While technically not relevant to this, for additional info I should note that the uploader here was just indefinitely blocked on the English Wikipedia after this discussion. Ed [talk] [OMT] 03:28, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. (A few were likely PD if they'd been sourced truthfully, but they weren't and no corrections have been made.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:20, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poster is PD in the USA, but likely not in Sweden. In Sweden, poster copyright in Sweden expire 70 years after authors death. EnDeeDoubleYou (talk) 02:21, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The author is Swedish artist Gunnar Håkansson (1891–1968). The file can be restored in 2039. --Rosenzweig τ 07:29, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:21, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this on my other account, Sportswriter22. I no longer want the picture up and I am not able to login to my other account. I can provide anyone with any information needed to get this deleted. Please and thank you. Radomaccountlol34567 (talk) 02:30, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I no longer want this picture up. It is something I uploaded a few months ago but no longer would like it to be available. Please and thank you so much! Someone please help, I am not experienced with Wikimedia Commons. Sportswriter202 (talk) 22:09, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

repeated destructive watermarks BarbacoaLosDomingos (talk) 03:08, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused, uncat. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:23, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NOTUSED 178.216.218.77 12:03, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep, no valid reason for deletion. Could be used in an article on Church of Maxwellism.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:04, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep per jeff Dronebogus (talk) 13:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:25, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Might be in scope if building/location/context was identified, but I don't see any use with no useful info. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:57, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. There was sufficient information (IKEA, Texas) to identify the location, and even without this, the image could be placed in Category:Brise soleils and Category:Worm's-eye view of buildings. If you don't like the frame, use Crop Tool. --Sitacuisses (talk) 11:34, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for identifying the location and adding description and relevant categories. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:17, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: nomination withdrawn; problems fixed by Sitacuisses. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:18, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a duplicate of File:KHQA-ABC logo.svg Chimatronx (talk) 02:04, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:24, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a duplicate of KHQA-CBS logo.svg. File:KHQA-CBS logo.svg Chimatronx (talk) 02:07, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:24, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lack of source + photo contains a visible watermark BarbacoaLosDomingos (talk) 03:00, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused, uncat. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:25, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The gif and the image were originally produced by the private company Animation Factory, not the USDA. This is shown on the EXIF data of Janitor.gif which reads "(c)2003 Animation Factory - www.animfactory.com". The files are also provided for sale at their current website here and here.

Howardcorn33 (talk) 09:01, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom, it appears USDA Kisatchie Forestry Service is not the copyright holder of this animation and image. Tvpuppy (talk) 22:42, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:26, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Pergnp (talk) 09:38, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason for deletion requested; in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:27, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by mistake Khajaa2020 (talk) 11:01, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Deletion was requested by the uploader shortly after upload but file is COM:INUSE at mn.wp. --Rosenzweig τ 11:24, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: still in use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:28, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Esta Bandera Es Ficticia GaelVector (talk) 12:11, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:29, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image not workings Perumalism (talk) 14:57, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, blank failed upload from 2019. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:31, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es obsoleto GaelVector (talk) 15:56, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:31, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

None of these photographs are "mechanical scans or photocopies of 70+ years old works"

Trade (talk) 19:35, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Just text, below copyright threshold. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 20:33, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And the photos? Trade (talk) 17:14, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A diskussion about this topic: Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2024/12#Copyright_status_of_scans_of_installation_media --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 09:14, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
why did you used a license which says the photographs are 70+ years old? Trade (talk) 08:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • There might be a case that most of the printed media seen which these files are derivative is {{PD-Text}}. The old Microsoft logo elsewhere File:Windows Logo (1992-2001).svg has been ruled as below US COM:TOO, so presuming that's correct its inclusion should be ok - but {{Trademark}} should be added. That said, the current {{PD-scan}} template specifically says "This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer." - media less than 70 years old was very clearly not made by anyone who was more than 70 years dead. If licenses can be corrected, I think ok - if no one thinks it worth bothering to give the files a correct license, I don't think Commons should bother to keep them, so  Delete unless licenses are fixed. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:08, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I have corrected their license as you have mentioned above. So, I think we can  Keep them. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 01:54, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: inaccurate licenses fixed; seem ok now. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:36, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken in Argentina in 1977. Currently in the public domain (20 years ppa), but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus it is still copyrighted in the US. Following PCP we cannot keep it. Günther Frager (talk) 17:58, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:57, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo published in the Argentine magazine Radiolandia in 1981. The photo is currently in the public domain in its country of origin, but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus it is still copyrighted in the US. Following PCP we cannot keep it. Günther Frager (talk) 18:21, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:56, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my photograph and permission has not been given to use on this site DentonHardwick100 (talk) 09:59, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This photograph has been used without permission PeterTatchell100 (talk) 10:18, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is my photograph and I have not given permission for it to be used on this site HarryStyles1000 (talk) 10:24, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This photograph does not have permission to be used. BobbyStyles10 (talk) 12:11, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This photograph belongs to me. I did not give permission for it to be used. There is copyright infringement. PeterTatchell1001 (talk) 10:51, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tumbleweed6000. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:26, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The person in the photo sent me an email requesting deletion, the subject line being: "Request for Removal of Image – Privacy / Personality Rights Concern" Rosiestep (talk) 14:20, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • I replied at Wikidata and now here: I agree that she is not notable. Ergo, her Wikidata item and her Wikimedia Commons photo (including the crop) should all be deleted. Thanks, and sorry for the extra work. --Rosiestep (talk) 00:45, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted per courtesy: subject not notable,nobodu opposes. --Ankry (talk) 12:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1953 Italian photographs, these look artistic and if Carapelli was the photographer, he died in 1958, and so URAA would have restored copyright until 2049. Abzeronow (talk) 02:25, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Carapelli is the actor we see here, not the photographer. "Simple" photographs per {{PD-Italy}} are images of people or of aspects, elements and facts of natural or social life, which these are not, as they are clearly shots created and posed for a photographer. The file can be restored in 2074 with PD-old-assumed. --Rosenzweig τ 22:11, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lacks EXIF data, other than a single field indicating authorship to what sounds like a company called QEvents. Most likely this is not the uploader's own work and almost certainly not theirs to release under any license.  —Andreitalk 08:28, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
I am the author and photographer of Ionel Mohîrță 2025.jpg.
The photo was taken by me personally, during the 2018 book launch event for Introducere în psihotanatologie.
I hold the full copyright and I uploaded the image myself under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
The mention of “QEvents” in the EXIF data is not a company or external source — it was automatically added by the camera software used at the event. The EXIF data may have been partially lost during image resizing before upload.
I confirm that this image is my own work and can be freely used under the stated license.
— User:Stan Ursu (creator of the article about Ionel Mohîrță on Romanian Wikipedia)
https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilizator:Stan_Ursu/teste Stan Ursu (talk) 11:57, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! You say you cropped the image prior to upload - do you still have to original image and can send it together with the statement from Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team#Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:26, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have sent the declaration of consent and the original photo to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. — Stan Ursu (talk) 5 November 2025 (EEST) Stan Ursu (talk) 21:29, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per archived VRT permission. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]