Jump to content

Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/07/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 3rd, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of copyright for this YouTube screenshot; of no value to Wikimedia, and uploaded by a globally locked LTA and self-promoting sockpuppet on en-wiki (Arya Shah and variant names thereof). Nick Moyes (talk) 10:01, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:10, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie Fsherberg (talk) 00:53, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How did you decide that? Sitting there between others and with both hands at sight it would be quite difficult to make a selfie, or "A selfie" as you like to say. BTW why do you use a different nick everyday, if it is not a secret? --E4024 (talk) 01:39, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nonsense request by an Android app user. --Achim (talk) 15:57, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Versehentliches hochladen GETTYGO Kommunikation (talk) 07:59, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 16:10, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong image Abu Hammad Husyn (talk) 12:31, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 16:28, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cross-wiki spam, not notable person, see deletions in multiple wikis: [1] Ctrl+F: 'deleted'

VLu (talk) 10:54, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete I do also wish that we may find a way to tell all the dozens os smaller wikis that kept his article. Wiki.en, Wiki.de, Wiki.es and Wiki.pt delete it, but it was recreated last week inside Wiki.fr. But there are dozens of small wiki with his article. How to deal with it? A Meta / Steward advise? :( Sturm (talk) 20:04, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And be aware, as soon as we delete these images, they will be uploaded again. Apparently, "Mr. Taurino's communication team" has been working on Wikipedia for years in a systematic, incisive and pernicious way. Sturm (talk) 20:11, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This is a case of cross-wiki spam. Taurino Araújo has been trying for seven years (!!!) to include his résumé in several wikis. As mentioned by proposer and other participants, Araújo is not a notorious person and articles are routinely deleted. Therefore, I understand that it is unnecessary to wait the usual seven days to delete the files. --Érico (talk) 22:49, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: The purpose of Commons is way vaster than serving as a support project for Wikipedia. The POV that this is considered spam for Wikipedia is irrelevant here, if the files can still serve educational or documental purposes, as is the case here. This DR should never have been speedied, as this was not an obvious situation. Inclusively a number of photos was in use, and others covered other important and notable subjects (even for Wikipedia), but they were speedied as well, against the rules and use of Commons. I am restoring some of them that cover other important subjects, or are/were in use in places where this bio is in scope, such as Wikidata.-- Darwin Ahoy! 14:30, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
DarwIn a. Why did you decide that you have the right to cancel another administrator's action? b. This is a case of regular deletion - ok, there was no reason for a speedy deletion, but for a speedy keep there is also no reason. Please restore the deletion templates and leave this request to an unbiased administrator. Also ping @Érico: . VLu (talk) 12:10, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@VLu: Because the action was against our rules, as explained. And I did consulted Érico before.-- Darwin Ahoy! 22:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
procedural close, page not archiving. --Minoraxtalk 11:45, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All of these files were restored by DarwIn on 4 July 2020, as noted above, with comment "should not have been deleted". They never got their 7-day DR due process. They are here for the purpose of promoting or advertising Taurino Araújo and should be deleted per COM:CSD#G10. Once the files are deleted, the category will be empty and it, too, should be deleted. Again: Cross-wiki spam, not notable person, see deletions in multiple wikis: [2] Ctrl+F: 'deleted'

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 22:47, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @VLu, Ixocactus, Érico, DarwIn as prior editors of this page.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 10:06, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like, at least for a few of these, we should consider whether having a freely licensed picture of the person - which Taurino Araújo could be cropped out of - would be worth it. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:53, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Adam Cuerden: I would not object to having freely licensed crops of the other people in those photos without Taurino Araújo here on Commons, whether as overwrites with revdel or as derivative works. However, I would not want to be the one to name them in Portuguese.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:18, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
G10 looks a good solution. Wikidata history shows that this guy is a LTA in our communities. Ixocactus (talk) 14:23, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ixocactus: Thanks. His communications or marketing team may also have resorted to meatpuppetry or sockpuppetry. See also d:WD:RFD#Q15709392 and d:WD:AN#Report_concerning_User:185.209.176.0/23.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:37, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: CSD F10. - FitIndia Talk 13:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recently, a ring of paid editors have created articles about Steve Dabliz, and have uploaded non-free images of him as "own work". I strongly suspect that this is one of those non-free images. ZLEA T\C 23:19, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And it appears I'm right. - ZLEA T\C 23:21, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:19, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot from a youtube video; uploader is not the copyright holder. Dead.rabbit (talk) 00:51, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Copyright violations are speedy deleted. --Green Giant (talk) 14:09, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is it the same file which was already deleted? E4024 (talk) 16:33, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Speedily deleted again. --Green Giant (talk) 23:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that any of them were published early enough to be legally public domain

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:45, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nomination has been withdrawn. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This media file may not fall within the project scope of Wikimedia Commons. All content on Wikimedia Commons must be realistically usable for an educational purpose, such as to be able to be used to illustrate the subject of an article on a Wikimedia project. For example, personal photos, unless they could possibly be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article for instance, may be considered to be out of scope.
Any content which falls outside the project scope might be nominated for deletion.

English  español  हिन्दी  magyar  italiano  македонски  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  中文  +/−
E4024 (talk) 14:54, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Gbawden at 18:29, 8 Juli 2020 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 02:29, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by AFBorchert at 18:29, 8 Juli 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) --Krdbot 02:30, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by AFBorchert at 18:30, 8 Juli 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) --Krdbot 02:30, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure with pixelated/jagged bonds. Have File:Skeletal formula of diethyl tartrate.svg as high-quality vector replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 21:18, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:28, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope. Rocky Masum (talk) 04:25, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be own work - seems like a magazine cover. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:30, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio and out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 07:41, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafiki Eoax (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Closing administrator please view this request with Visual File Change to see the pattern of no metadata other than FBMD transmission #s, or Google software. No indication by file size, continuity of style, white balance, sharpness or any other feature that any photo here is own work of uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:43, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:34, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS, and No FoP in Denmark for artistic works. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Legoland Billund 0428.jpg.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:08, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion, no FOP in Denmark. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 22:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:11, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of Panorama does only apply for buildings. COM:FOP Denmark. Also see previous discussions like this one.

Lukas Beck (talk) 06:12, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:11, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 06:45, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Fantasy diagram - see https://wiki.massivecraft.com/List_of_Minor_Nations_and_States#Visois Slashme (talk) 08:04, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope. copy of cd covers

Adelfrank (talk) 08:36, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:15, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused exam question. Unlikely to be own work. No meaningful description. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 10:17, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused exam question. Unlikely to be own work. No meaningful description. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 10:18, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anna van Vliet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

photos of photos, need permission or info about pd status

Gbawden (talk) 11:44, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:22, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 13:30, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mukesh850 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:01, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:29, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:02, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:29, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo and only contribution, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:03, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:29, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:04, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:29, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Migebert (talk) 16:45, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:28, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 17:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:28, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rexyli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

More unremarkable male genitalia.

Frood (talk) 17:22, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:27, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality graph, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:20, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable band, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:15, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable band, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:16, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cslevine (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images and text docs, COM:WEBHOST, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:17, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:25, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:19, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:20, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality electrical diagram, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:26, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ukczev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos and diagram, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:28, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:17, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fouèd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text-only doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:31, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promo image MiguelAlanCS (talk) 19:32, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused packaging photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:34, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:37, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alca72 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:39, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lemarcus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low-quality personal photos, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:43, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:44, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Richard702 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:45, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of commons scope Migebert (talk) 19:48, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:50, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Galm107 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:58, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:09, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was created to mock a victim of sexual harassment. Susmuffin (talk) 20:10, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:13, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andresferrespo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photos of non-notable persons, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:16, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality photo of non-notable band, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:19, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Javivasg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:23, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of commons:scope Migebert (talk) 21:23, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 21:24, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of commons:scope Migebert (talk) 21:25, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of commons:scope Migebert (talk) 21:26, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any scope? E4024 (talk) 22:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No notability (this is kinda logo of an insignificant group of self-promoting writers). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:42, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No notability (symbolics of an insignificant group of self-promoting writers). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:43, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:07, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:50, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 23:00, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in US for artworks.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:39, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:37, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in US for artworks.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:47, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:38, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in US for artworks.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:09, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:38, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in US for artworks.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:55, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:38, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in US for artworks.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:11, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:40, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in US for artworks.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:17, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Addition,

--Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:08, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:50, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted statues. No FoP in Japan for artistic works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:37, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:50, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low Quality Yungelita (talk) 07:26, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 12:13, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lauracarraway (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. No EXIF data. Looks like advertising.

Smooth O (talk) 09:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:41, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sdaluz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

artist is still alive, needs permission

Gbawden (talk) 11:47, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:41, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bastian brandis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:43, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bastian brandis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of own work, single topic, possible promotional attemp.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kalaakar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:45, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is from Forbes magazine https://www.forbes.com/pictures/59fb6d60a7ea436b47b4c755/adam-charlap-hyman-28-l-a/#498024de63dc Jooojay (talk) 07:25, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unlikely own work, COM:OTRS needed. --Strakhov (talk) 21:10, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Whatsapp - not own work Gbawden (talk) 10:49, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, low quality, unlikely own work. --Strakhov (talk) 21:14, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 21:16, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 21:16, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушение авторского права Kotofey2016 (talk) 06:18, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted, the author died in 1964. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:12, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work - no permission for original work (shown photos) Wdwd (talk) 11:30, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wdwd, the photo is licensed under CC-by-4.0, it can be found on this page in footer in Ukrainian: Всі фотографії на цьому сайті, авторами яких є співробітники «РБК-Україна» розміщені на умовах ліцензії Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.

It means: All photos on this site, the authors of which are employees of RBC-Ukraine, are posted under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

--Goo3 (talk) 11:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: There is no problem with the copyright of the whole photograph, it is licenced under CC indeed. The problem is that the photograph of the child in the center of this picture has, theoretically, its own copyright holder - and _that_ copyright holder, according to Commons rules (see Commons:De_minimis), must also grant legal permission for using _this_ whole picture. As long as it did not happen yet, I have to delete this. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown author and unknown source. Based on the situation, this image belongs to the media or to a media employee. obvious copyright infringement and fraudulent license Khinkali (talk) 12:52, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: seems to appear at the official page of the portrayed person 2 days before uploading to Commons: https://tsepkalo.by/articles/my-podali-dokumenty-v-czik/ Consequently, it cannot be uploaded without OTRS permission. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:45, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low grade vanity pic. Out of scope. Only deployed on user pages Timtrent (talk) 14:15, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no notability, no foreseeable educational usage. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable "own" claim. Photo have a metadata which start with FBMD, and that indicates it were uploaded from Facebook before contribution here Микола Василечко (talk) 15:47, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (also he is not notable, both in ru.wiki and uk.wiki the articles have been deleted years ago). --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own work? copyright? * https://www.kino-teatr.ru/kino/acter/m/ros/239007/foto/986228/ Adelfrank (talk) 16:04, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adelfrank (talk) 19:59, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation, repost. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:06, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:08, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own work? copyright? * https://imcreator.ru/archives/15406 Adelfrank (talk) 21:11, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:54, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing stereochemistry at two locations, and it's not obvious what it should be. Have File:Taxadiene.svg as proper alt. DMacks (talk) 03:26, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vigoshi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

False licence tags, no indication these could be in public domain.

VLu (talk) 12:35, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:45, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adolphe GLIDJA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:46, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ritzoffice (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:46, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zainil401 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:47, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Attilariti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and coat of arms. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:47, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Petaluma, Sononia County, California

[edit]

The files within Category:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Petaluma, Sononia County, California look to be a partial duplication of the files in Category:Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Petaluma, Sonoma County, California. I asked @: here for confirmation as it's too difficult to manually confirm each image but got no response. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:19, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The date was 12 March. UK lockdown officially started 23rd, but I stopped leaving the house on 15th as I'm in the borough with the highest death count in the UK and I'm a higher risk group; so had other stuff to worry about, like food and meds.
Also ref. to the notice on the top of my talk page.
{{Duplicate}} would have been sufficient rather than a DR, there's not a lot to discuss if they are digitally identical duplicates. -- (talk) 18:30, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@: . I didn't mean it as a criticism but I wasn't really sure they were duplicates or if I was missing something. You know there is a vast, vast number of files out there. As such, I'll label these as duplicates and an administrator can close this later as moot. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:22, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: files were processed as duplicates. --JuTa 20:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously exceeds the copyright threshold. 轻语者 (talk) 23:17, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 01:59, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and pixelated with some unusual geometries; have File:Nilotinib.svg among others in a variety of styles in Category:Nilotinib DMacks (talk) 03:22, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only use is in a userspace draft that's been abandoned (because the user themself has stopped editing) for almost 10 years. DMacks (talk) 03:23, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 21:42, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect 3D model: ionic bonds drawn as covalent. Wostr (talk) 22:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC) Make better! ОЛЕГ111111 (talk) 17:04, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is already: File:Kaliumphosphat.png. This is the correct way to depict salts. Wostr (talk) 21:11, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 21:44, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alitta Cat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.Private image

SCP-2000 08:48, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete for this list of files anyway. None of them appear to be in use, as yet anyway. (N.B. the last files seems to be a duplicate of File:Mary Alodia.jpg which is in use - see the next list - although this version isn't, so delete those on this list in my opinion. Thanks. Crep171166 (talk) 07:56, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: this is the third attempt to upload these pictures of no value. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 04:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alitta Cat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

SCP-2000 06:36, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep for 4 of them as follows: As far as I can see 4 of these files are in use on the uploader's user page as their personal photos (the top three and bottom one). I think these should be kept as per: "by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal Commons user page is allowed"; ref COM:INUSE. Thanks. Crep171166 (talk) 07:48, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete: Per COM:NOTSOCIAL, files in use are only in use on non-active editors' talk pages, which appears to be co-opted for personal use. — BriefEdits (talk) 21:47, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per BriefEdits. --Strakhov (talk) 21:13, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Posted as a profile upload, but arbitrarily modify your profile and use it for multiple users to shoot Hankooni (talk) 02:43, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Posted as a profile upload, but arbitrarily modify your profile and use it for multiple users to shoot Hankooni (talk) 03:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination by requester = uploader Hankooni, OTRS pending. --Achim (talk) 21:41, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:26, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Referal, as 'contractor' report. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:12, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: This seems to have been published (it has an ISBN) in 1977 (title page) with no copyright notice, so I've tagged it {{PD-US-no-notice}}. --bjh21 (talk) 12:33, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:29, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily PD-US-Gov, report prepared by contractor or grantee ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:18, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No copyright notice, so I've tagged it {{PD-US-no-notice}}. Government Printing Office imprint on page E.4/32 is evidence of publication. --bjh21 (talk) 13:48, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:31, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not Necessarily PD-US-Gov, Report prepared by Contractor or Grantee... ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:20, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No copyright notice, so I've tagged it {{PD-US-no-notice}}. Government Printing Office ID at the back is evidence of publication. --bjh21 (talk) 13:53, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:31, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily PD-US-Gov, Report prepared by a third party, contractor or grantee. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:47, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No copyright notice or registration, so I've tagged it {{PD-US-1978-89}}. Government Printing Office imprint at the back suggests publication. --bjh21 (talk) 17:42, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:32, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily PD-US-Gov, Third party report produced under contract. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:52, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No copyright notice and not registered. Now tagged {{PD-US-1978-89}}. Government Printing Office imprint near the back suggests that it was published. --bjh21 (talk) 17:45, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:32, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission StarryHome (talk) 14:48, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 22:48, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by LifetimeWiki as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://mobile.twitter.com/VilasRupawate/photo
Converted to regular DR, as provided external hit is undated and cropped compared to our upload from 2013. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:20, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, probably copyvio. Taivo (talk) 14:28, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is copy-righted, see en:Völkerball Editor-1 (talk) 12:09, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:48, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own work? copyright Bruno BK Adelfrank (talk) 13:34, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:08, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published photo (https://finance.tut.by/news545118.html), OTRS ticket required Ytoyoda (talk) 13:45, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

previously published photo: https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/491525746820880269/?nic_v1=1aIe9BOmBJ5QNox4LNb%2FhBNFpSst8yNgq9ptCbmy5V7nfKxBzyM2bCDdjn2xPa8lmD Ytoyoda (talk) 13:48, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fireshow-by (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photographer credit on the images indicate these are not original works

Ytoyoda (talk) 13:49, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a picture of a printed poster and there is no clear evidence if the uploader is the original copyright holder Psubhashish (talk) 14:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:09, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:09, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:09, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, found here after upload but no exif and the uploader is in the photo Gbawden (talk) 14:47, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 11:10, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded from my ip address 66.249.69.123 to wikimedia commons on 1 June 2020, 23:31,3 July 2020(UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by K A Amarnath (talk • contribs) 18:01, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jaymarturns (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio https://twitter.com/martin_camera/status/854751953557082114/photo/1 . Хоббит (talk) 15:50, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rewiye tine (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Evs108 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joshiuwa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unhelpful descriptions or file names. Probably not notable person. Unused and uncategorised files. Commons is not private media repository.

Estopedist1 (talk) 07:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

however, one file name is helpful. One person is en:Bernard Chandran and other its spouse Datin Mary Lourdes Chandran. And it is deleted from enwiki, see en:Mary Lourdes Chandran--Estopedist1 (talk) 07:10, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvios. --Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in US for artworks.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Such an outdoor attraction is a "building" and not a "statue" - therefore FOP is OK Deror avi (talk) 07:48, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
These are not buildings. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:11, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:07, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jbaguio2290 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photographs of printed material that seems unlikely to be the uploader's own work.

El Grafo (talk) 13:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 20:58, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image belongs to a corporation, not a governmental organization Alqhaderi AliffianikoTalk 09:43, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted statue. No FoP in US for artworks. Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:21, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:28, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot see any scope here. One-time visitor left her own or someone else left this personal image here. If she were nude or partially nude I am sure we could find many categories to make her in scope: Nude women leaning backwards, nude women looking at the viewer, nude women smiling, nude women smiling and looking at the viewer, nude women before a wooden board, nude women before a wooden board and holding one of their hands between the legs, etc. If I were her I would ask for my right to be present in Commons being out of scope just like so many other women whose images we keep here as if they were sacred bones of the founding prophets of some mysterious cult. E4024 (talk) 01:31, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:30, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a promo pic used as band's profile pic across internet. No indication of permission. Renata3 (talk) 02:58, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:30, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Norway A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:31, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted statue. No FoP in US for artworks. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:28, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:31, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for sculpture or other 3D art in US DMacks (talk) 03:35, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:31, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. No FoP in US for artworks. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:01, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:31, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in Japan for artistic works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:45, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in US for artworks. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:32, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted statue. No FoP in US for artworks. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:28, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:32, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The first one isn't a toy, it's a costume. Also they're in Tokyo, and Japanese law is generous on the "utility" aspect of toys, thus images of them are not protected to the extent elsewhere. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't it a toy? If so, I add "COM:DW of copyrighted characters" as the reason for this deletion request. Duffy and friends are copyrighted by Disney. [4] --Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:00, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - costume may be protected too. See Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:36, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters. Duffy and friends are copyrighted by Disney. [5]

Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:52, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. Duffy is copyrighted by Disney. [6]

Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:10, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted. Taivo (talk) 18:24, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are some likely issues here: - COM:FOP Hong Kong mandates a permanent exhibition for sculptural works if those are to be imaged under that statute of limitation - if the things aren't sculptures, then COM:TOYS comes on top as for why these images can't be hosted here.

Grand-Duc (talk) 13:20, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of Music Album under Copyright Caulfield (talk) 07:31, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:39, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo may be PD, but contains sculptral works which are not. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:50, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:40, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from art. Should be cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - also grabbed from facebook as per metadatas. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:08, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kenny perez rojas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from book covers.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:08, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 15:17, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt they reach threshold of originality and de minimis applies. // Liftarn (talk) 05:46, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:07, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 15:17, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt they reach threshold of originality and de minimis applies. // Liftarn (talk) 05:46, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:07, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:07, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:06, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:06, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wolfgang 7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:05, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

asked by the photographied person Lucyin (talk) 16:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:05, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own work? copyright Michael Ryzhov Adelfrank (talk) 16:08, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:04, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 16:24, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:04, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:43, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:03, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:44, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:03, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:46, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:02, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:46, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:02, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:46, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:01, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't appear to be own work Faisal talk 16:56, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:59, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of 3D Viewer, a Microsoft software; see en:w:Template:Non-free Microsoft screenshot. Ntx61 (talk) 17:15, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:56, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at the source 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:41, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:55, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry image - Better images in the cat –Davey2010Talk 18:22, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:54, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as no permission (No permission since) Regasterios (talk) 18:55, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: derivative work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:53, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is not a simple text logo but is a creative work, permission organization and / or maker is missing Gouwenaar (talk) 20:54, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:52, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hardly own work by uploader; found prepublished in 2015 and 2006. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:20, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:46, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake. Shoulder straps did not exist. Niklitov (talk) 21:49, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: file is used therefore in scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:44, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake. Shoulder straps did not exist. Correct version in 1952: Niklitov (talk) 13:26, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:00, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per resolution and missing EXIF data this image is unlikely own work by the uploader. It's also published here, per EXIF data from 2005. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:50, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:43, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 22:45, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:42, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reason that the image is a public domain. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:04, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete - Apparently, this is from 1974. The PD tag suggests that the author has passed away before 1942 (the file was uploaded in 2012), but the photo is too new for that to be plausible. Ahmadtalk 20:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:42, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only intended for use on the Persian Wikipedia, where the subject's article was deleted in 2018, 2019, and 2020 as non-notable. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 23:46, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:41, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

all incorrect categories, no exif, only former upload was deleted and may be the very same image as this upload. CopyVio C.Suthorn (talk) 07:30, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:59, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hot bra.jpg Rehanarose (talk) 10:33, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close: already deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:32, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: https://www.caranddriver.com/lexus/is 182.30.193.107 13:20, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle at 09:32, 15 August 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 13:57, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy 91.140.37.65 11:30, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is my photo that I took and uploaded to Wikipedia. Why is it being removed? The sculpture is a tourist attraction. ParsonsPhotographyNL (talk) 21:48, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@BaileyParsonsNL: because there's no freedom of panorama in Italy and you are likely not the copyright owner either of the Palazzo della Borsa or of Maurizio Cattelan's L.O.V.E.--Carnby (talk) 09:03, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Disney World opened in 1971. But, the license for this file is PD-old-70-1923. It is impossible. This license is invalid. Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:00, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:14, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tiao carreiro.png Agtalves (talk) 02:12, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Own work is unlikely, probably copyvio. Taivo (talk) 17:29, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unexplained diagram. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:02, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD US Gov, Report by third party for commeircal organisation... ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:03, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural Close - See combined DR filed subsequently.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:09, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn in favor of combined DR. (non-admin closure) —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:28, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gloucester1692 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This gallery is of older works, however, they are all licensed as "own work," which they obviously are not. Some/many of these may be able to be retained with research, but COM:EVID places the effort on the uploader, not the Commons community

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:41, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I'd like to say that I'm still relatively new to Wikipedia/Wikimedia, and joined last August. The learning process has been extremely difficult because the help that is available has proved time and time again to be inaccessible and not user friendly. That being said, I have been penalized for things on a very inconsistent basis. Early on, many of my articles or uploads took months to be verified, and users would leave comments about what they thought needed improvement, etc. Now, my articles just appear on Google weeks after, which tells me they have been verified in some way. What I take issue with is the upload of pictures, because once again, there is great inconsistency. They are public domain images brought to Wikimedia because they were absent here. Most aren't my "own work" but I don't want an article with no pictures because someone higher up hasn't uploaded them to Wikimedia. I really need someone to just help me navigate the Wikimedia process because I'd like to know who has the authority. Some users have bypassed this "copyright" issue; you'll notice some of these works were uploaded months ago. Other users have flat out deleted the pictures without contacting me, or sent me notices they'd be deleted. I would be appreciative of help from a user, and not directed to another page where I cannot understand the material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gloucester1692 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gloucester1692 (talk) 12:40, 3 July 2020

Hi Gloucester1692: For all images uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, a "source" is needed. If they are from a book, author name, date of publication and so on is needed. If the image is from a website, the URL is needed. Images which are not "own work" by you with your camera of things you created need to be licensed correctly if they are public domain. If they are not in the public domain, and not your own work licensed correctly, Commons cannot provide free hosting. For example, File:William James Roe Newburgh News.png seems to be from an early enough date that it can't possibly be your own work. But if a better source than "own work" were given, it's possible it could be retained. We don't have anything to do with the "articles," only the images. Cheers. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:44, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ellin Beltz So from what I'm gathering, If I insert some type of citation, page reference, or URL, the files can be saved? There are many on this list which can be deleted — they were uploaded mistakenly for Wikisource and I wasn't sure how to delete them. These are File:Chapters From the New Apocrypha - Who Is His Mother?.png up to File:The Sin of the Nations.png. Others, such as File:William James Roe Portrait .jpg, were taken on my phone, and were found in a folder in a local library. I know this particular portrait dates to c. 1885, but I'm wondering how I would cite something random like this. It is my own work, but I can't find the origin of the original work, if you understand. Is there a deadline for the deletion? I'm beginning to go back and correct my mistakes now, but how will I know which works will be saved and which can be redeemed? Thank you.Gloucester1692 (talk) 1:27, 4 July 2020

Hi Gloucester1692: You just keep working on them, and stay in touch and even if something were to be rendered invisible to the public which later you found the citation, it could be restored. If you would be so kind to highlight the whole list of which could be deleted as I did above with the first ones you mentioned. How do you know the date of the portrait? Is that data point in a book or source? If so, you just cite what you have, as well as the dates of birth-death on any subjects, and so on. Just like citing anything in a paper or on wikipedia: Put what you have, and we can work through it. Deadlines for deletion are usually seven days, but in this case, I am certain they will hold off while you and I work on these! Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:21, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ellin Beltz Thank you for your help! The portrait was from an interview published in a magazine that is available on HathiTrust, in the public domain. I will add citations to the others and can link to their pages.Gloucester1692 (talk) 5:20, 5 July 2020

Good work! Gloucester1692, I spot checked a few that you've worked on and you've got it! Closing administrator please review all, uploader appears to have fixed the situation. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - sources were added or can be easily found. --Materialscientist (talk) 12:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error de imagen EmmanuelCravioto (talk) 06:15, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No permission at source. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless. I don't think it is realistically useful for any educational purpose (COM:EDUSE). Moreover the absence of any description makes it even more useless. Lastly the girl siluette looks coming from a clipart collection with unknown copyright status. Basilicofresco (msg) 06:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Basilicofresco: It was part of Commons:Wiki_Loves_Love_2019, not shure if it that's a valid reason to keep, if not:  Delete.
In case of deletion, please also (speedy-)delete the relating raster-image File:Gesture_of_love.png.
 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 07:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I dont want to longer participate in wikipedia! Ehtesham ahmad babu (talk) 18:44, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: user talk pages dont get deleted. --JuTa 21:09, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушение авторского права Kotofey2016 (talk) 06:17, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Painter: en:Sergey Vasilyevich Gerasimov (1885-1964). --MGA73 (talk) 09:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушение авторских прав Kotofey2016 (talk) 06:28, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Monument made by Creator:Zurab Tsereteli that is still alive and no FOP in Russia per COM:FOP Russia. --MGA73 (talk) 09:38, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With EXIF: File:Kempit railway station.jpg Alqhaderi AliffianikoTalk 09:11, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Uploader requested. --MGA73 (talk) 09:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission أمين (talk) 21:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:47, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rf/copy/ss ahuR ☘ 09:15, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#F10. --4nn1l2 (talk) 01:45, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata indicates the image was downloaded from Instagram Ytoyoda (talk) 12:24, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I agree. It also has the exact size of Instagram photo. Deleted per COM:PRP. --Podzemnik (talk) 11:05, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From https://www.transfermarkt.com/cihan-ak/profil/spieler/700629 Ytoyoda (talk) 12:31, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 11:05, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From https://twitter.com/ghanafaofficial/status/912809545294057472?s=21 Ytoyoda (talk) 12:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 11:06, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, wrong file name.--Mahlzahn (talk) 09:51, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then renaming to e.g. “Bitcoin coin in plastic packaging”?--Mahlzahn (talk) 13:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; files can be renamed. --Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF and too small to be "own work" as declared. E4024 (talk) 20:51, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF and too small to be "own work" as declared. E4024 (talk) 20:54, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF and too small to be "own work" as declared. E4024 (talk) 20:54, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:49, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded a SVG version File:LC Zürich Logo.svg and replaced the png. Malo95 (talk) 07:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:21, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of sculpture artwork shown, which needs a seperate licence ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:54, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:24, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative image , no FoP for artwork in the US ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:55, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:24, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can be a fake license, see https://soyuzmash.ru/activities/degterev-stal-pochetnym-grazhdaninom-goroda Bilderling (talk) 10:43, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted magazine cover, 1980. Retired electrician (talk) 12:52, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't appear to be own work Faisal talk 16:42, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't appear to be own work Faisal talk 16:45, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:26, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't appear to be own work Faisal talk 16:50, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:26, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Neither CC-BY-SA nor public domain. Source: http://guaxupe.org.br/centenario-de-nascimento-de-dom-jose-alberto.html Py4nf (talk) 16:58, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:26, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

INFORMACION JOGILUPA (talk) 16:59, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F7 and scope. --Gbawden (talk) 06:26, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be CC-BY-SA since the source is a magazine published by the Diocese of Guaxupé. See http://guaxupe.org.br/diocese-de-guaxupe-lancara-revista-historica-do-centenario.html Py4nf (talk) 17:36, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:26, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promo image. No EXIF data MiguelAlanCS (talk) 19:30, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; can be undeleted with OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

B-Boy Hong10 from Korea poses for an action shot on the top of Schilthorn in Switzerland on Feb 23rd 2018 // Little Shao/Red Bull Content Pool // AP-1UWGNJ22W2111 // Usage for editorial use only // E4024 (talk) 21:36, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; no indication of a free license at source. --Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 06:44, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a bit of a stretch to call chalk letters and numbers "graphic art". CentreLeftRight 08:20, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I see it as a text offering a discount not as a "graphic work". Oleryhlolsson (talk) 12:54, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think the graphic art referred to is the photo at left which would need to be blurred or cropped to keep this file Gbawden (talk) 06:22, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:35, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lovewhatyoudo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Those video are low quality and taken by phone. Some part of video have the blurred subtitle, such as file:6月30日云南昭通暴雨水灾.webm. Also, per this article, it seem that those video is upload by local netizens originally, and not The Epoch Times. Based on COM:PCP, those file should be deleted.

SCP-2000 08:21, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Whether it is originally uploaded by netizens is not the issue. The point is, it is safe to assume The Epoch Times has acquired the footage from villagers who took them or from the video streaming sites. Reason: The Epoch Times is a U.S. newspaper with 20-year history. Based on American journalistic standard, it would be safe to assume they acquired the footages. I would also imagine The Epoch Times had no difficulty at all when acquiring those footage from those Chinese villagers, due to its renowned Chinese government- skeptic stance. Lovewhatyoudo (talk) 08:47, 3 July 2020 (UTC) (edited on 13 July)[reply]
  • We are in no position to accuse this newspaper of copying materials without acquiring them. Bottom line, The Epoch Times release the footage in Creative Commons terms on YouTube. Lovewhatyoudo (talk) 08:47, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The facebook page you mentioned belongs to Radio Free Asia (RFA), which is a propaganda news agency similar to The Epoch Times, both of which are U.S.-based, hard-line Chinese government- skeptic. It is safe to assume these two U.S. news agency share propaganda material under Creative Commons for the purpose of, well, promoting propaganda. Lovewhatyoudo (talk) 10:08, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Epoch Times has sent special correspondents to visit the flooded site and interviewed the villagers, which enabled them to publish exclusive first hand accounts and photographs (refer their reports on Guangxi, Yunnan). The Epoch Times is likely to not put their journalists on the government's register, but they do have journalists based in China. Lovewhatyoudo (talk) 14:20, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Whether it is originally uploaded by netizens is not the problem. The point is, it is safe to assume The Epoch Times has acquired the footage from villagers who took them or from the video streaming sites. Lovewhatyoudo (talk) 14:20, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: The Epoch Times may have acquired the contents only for their own use, and it is not possible to re-license contents they do not own under a CC-BY license. --Wcam (talk) 20:08, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:36, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mpetrova59 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like a bunch of copyright violations uploaded in a single batch of less than one hour on August 7th, 2014, by a throw-away account. Several of these are without doubt professional product shots that have been published elsewhere before:

Some of the other non-studio pictures of the user's uploads have an author name in the EXIF that matches the user name. They still feel a bit suspect, but so far I didn't find anything suggesting that they're copyvios as well.

-- El Grafo (talk) 13:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:38, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No explanation regarding source. Probable copyright violation. पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 04:03, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This picture was create by me, Iraninfo1970 upon a wall scripts I found In Iran. NO COPYRIGHTS ARE VIOLETED AT ALL!! (talk)


Kept: per uploader's assertion, until proven otherwise. Not found elsewhere using Google Images. --P 1 9 9   20:45, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that these photos were published over 50 years ago. Two of the files don't provide an adequate source, and the third's source doesn't verify its date of publication.

ƏXPLICIT 06:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This article (Pakistani Pop Music: A Visual History) contains a caption for the File:Anwar Rana Waheed Malik 1965.png image, indicating it shows the recording of the song Ko Ko Korina which was released in 1966. --Goldsztajn (talk) 11:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This does not verify that the photograph was published in 1965. ƏXPLICIT 06:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm trying to confirm whether this has actually been published (since appearance on the internet does not constitute publication under the Ordinance) and therefore can be treated as in public domain from the date of creation; please allow some more time.--Goldsztajn (talk) 08:51, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, sufficient time has past. Undelete if ever evidence to the contrary is found. --P 1 9 9   20:51, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Delete|Error de carga}} Glen16383 (talk) 18:11, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused personal logo, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   20:56, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statue is copyrighted, no FOP Gbawden (talk) 10:49, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:45, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Lithuania 91.140.37.65 11:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If so why are you not requesting deletion of the nearly 20 similar files in the relevant Category. Why have you picked this one? Ardfern (talk) 08:05, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
* Keep: its needful picture  Rajuiu (talk) 15:35, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:46, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Lithuania 91.140.37.65 11:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If so why are you not requesting deletion of the nearly 20 similar files in the relevant Category. Why have you picked this one? Ardfern (talk) 08:07, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:48, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy 91.140.37.65 11:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily PD-US-Gov, Reports prepared by third-part contractor or grantee..

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:22, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No copyright notice or registration of any of these, so I've tagged them {{PD-US-no-notice}} and {{PD-US-1978-89}} as appropriate. The "Note to Reader" at the back of File:Assessment of EPSDT practices and costs - report on the cost impact of the EPSDT program (IA assessmentofepsd00mill 0).pdf, from the project officer in DHEW, makes me think that they were published. --bjh21 (talk) 15:23, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Bjh21. ƏXPLICIT 12:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:24, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Commnos is the repository of unused files also, that can be used in the future. Electron   18:48, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 12:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy 91.140.37.65 11:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: building is below ToO (it's a tower), and Can be seen as under ToO in Italy. These buildings are not considred of particular artistic/creative interest by the MiBAC (the Ministry). See the list of individual decrees. Ruthven (msg) 12:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Refferal as "resarch paper", not necessarily PD-US-Gov ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:13, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No copyright notice or registration. I've tentatively applied {{PD-US-1978-89}}, but I'm not sure about the publication requirement. --bjh21 (talk) 12:49, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per bjh21. Ruthven (msg) 12:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily PD-US-Gov, "Research Report" or "contractor" produced. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:13, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: I've tagged this as {{PD-US-1978-89}}: no copyright notice or registration, and the order form for more copies near the back is evidence it was published. --bjh21 (talk) 12:53, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per bjh21. Ruthven (msg) 12:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Referal as "Research Report", Not necessarily PD-US-Gov. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:15, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No copyright notice, so I've tagged it {{PD-US-no-notice}}. It's possible it's unpublished, though. --bjh21 (talk) 12:56, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per bjh21. Ruthven (msg) 12:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily PD-US-Gov , referal as "Working paper" by contractor. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:17, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No copyright notice or registration. Tagged {{PD-US-1978-89}}. Possibly unpublished, though. --bjh21 (talk) 12:58, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per bjh21. Ruthven (msg) 12:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily PD-US-Gov, Research report from a 'contractor' or 'grantee'. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:12, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No copyright notice, so I've tagged it {{PD-US-no-notice}}. Maybe a slight question-mark over publication. --bjh21 (talk) 13:14, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per bjh21. Ruthven (msg) 12:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessasrily PD-US-Gov, "Report" prepared by Contractor or grantee.. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No copyright notice, so I've retagged as {{PD-US-no-notice}}. Only possible question-mark is over publication. --bjh21 (talk) 13:19, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 12:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily PD-US-Gov, Report prepared by contractor or grantee. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:16, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No copyright notice and no registration, so I've tagged it {{PD-US-1978-89}}. Only possible problem is if it's unpublished. --bjh21 (talk) 13:43, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per bjh21. Ruthven (msg) 12:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

저작권 위반(mbc 문화방송 소유) Sim1992 (talk) 13:49, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No evidence of permission to license it under CC-BY-SA. --Larryasou (talk) 14:05, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no evidence of free license. --Jianhui67 TC 13:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Odisha Review is published by the Odisha state government and is copyrighted whereas the uploader has mentioned it as their own work. See http://magazines.odisha.gov.in/Orissareview/orissareview.htm Psubhashish (talk) 15:53, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Press photo A. Shohag 11:39, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   14:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not released by Gallica under a public domain license ("domaine public") but under the text "conditions spécifiques d'utilisation - Projet de numérisation des indisponibles - " (specific conditions of use - Unavailable [books] digitization project) Le Petit Chat (talk) 14:00, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, not in PD ("Rights: restricted use"). --P 1 9 9   14:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD-US Gov report, third-party report by commerical organization ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:00, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No copyright notice and no registration, so I've tagged it {{PD-US-1978-89}}. The only possible question is over whether it was unpublished. --bjh21 (talk) 17:36, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Bjh21. --P 1 9 9   14:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, 'charcter design' and 'stage-set' , No FoP for artwork in the US ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:57, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The seal is not applicable to the PD-ROC-exempt, and the evidence (official website) indicates that the seal is copyrighted. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 12:13, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Government agnecies' works are not automatically free of copyright.--Larryasou (talk) 07:17, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screenshot of a timelapse video: https://www.tellerreport.com/life/2019-08-27---fc-barcelona-opens-estadi-johan-cruyff-.S1ZbQYymBH.html Ytoyoda (talk) 14:43, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is not PD-USGov, Inspection copy of a Report by a commerical entity.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:35, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Being annual reports, they are intended to be a public statement in line with legal requirements, which is probably why they were put in a Federal library at some point. There are no copyright claims as far as I can see, so {{PD-US-1978-89}} applies. -- (talk) 10:55, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Query, Do these reports carry any kind of copyright notice at all? And are they listed on the Copyright Office database? Hmmm ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:12, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can tell the answers to both questions are "no", so I've tagged them {{PD-US-1978-89}}. --bjh21 (talk) 12:35, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I did my own qucik chekc for mention in the post 1978 records, and did not find anything immediate.
Resolved
- Can an admin close this as Keep, status has been determined, and there are no delete votes? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:49, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD-US Gov, Third party reports by commerical orgnizations, contractors or grantees.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:08, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: All retagged as {{PD-US-1978-89}}. I can't find a copyright notice on any of them, nor can I find a registration on https://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?DB=local&PAGE=First. It's possible they're unpublished, I suppose. --bjh21 (talk) 16:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily PD-US Gov, Third party reports by commercial orgnizations, contractors or grantees.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:33, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It would seem safe to merge any additions to an existing open DR like this to the earlier list. The rationales for keep or delete are identical. -- (talk) 09:03, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: All retagged as {{PD-US-1978-89}}. I can't find a copyright notice on any of them, nor can I find a registration on https://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?DB=local&PAGE=First. It's possible they're unpublished, I suppose. --bjh21 (talk) 11:58, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per bjh21. --Stifle (talk) 17:00, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily PD-US-Gov, Report prepared by third party organization, contractor or grantee.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:18, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily PD-US-Gov, Report prepared by third party organization, contractor or grantee.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Weak delete It is theoretically possible that it was published only on the following year. It was finished on 21st of July 1977, so I think that it is sufficient time to pubish it in that year. Pencil marking with 1977 on the cover page done by the library support that assertion. The author is stated as "C-b Shale Oil Venture", and not United States government. Sadly we should probably delete. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 13:39, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 12:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily PD-US-Gov, Report prepared by third party organisation, contractor or grantee..

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:55, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The first has no copyright notice and is unregistered, so I've tagged it as {{PD-US-1978-89}}. The second and third both claim to be produced by BLM, so I've tagged them {{PD-USGov-BLM}}. I can't see any credits to third parties in either of them, --bjh21 (talk) 12:13, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:49, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake or incorrect license. Own work as of 1877? Bilderling (talk) 18:41, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PCP. --MB-one (talk) 09:40, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:44, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PCP. --MB-one (talk) 09:42, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be pd PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:45, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PCP. --MB-one (talk) 09:42, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be copyright of the uploader since it comes from an organisation. Suspected Copyvio Timtrent (talk) 21:00, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Timtrent Hi, This image was created by me and was uploaded by abiding to the Wikipedia license norms and can be used anywhere else in public. I don't have any issue in using this file in the article.

NaandhaanAvan (talk) 07:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • NaandhaanAvan Wikimedia Commons has very rigorous policies about copyright work. You may be asked to prove that you created the work and to go through a process to licence it to be displayed here. Commons may look similar to Wikipedia, but it is entirely different. A place to ask about this is Commons:Village_pump/Copyright. If your file is deleted, provided the correct proofs are given you will be allowed to upload it again. Timtrent (talk) 07:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PCP. --MB-one (talk) 09:47, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derviative image of a copyright charcter , and sculptural artwork, uncelar date so cannot determine if a non renewal or non-notice situation for the deisgn shown applies. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:52, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 10:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license tag states that it's only valid for files pre-1987, and this SVG is clearly made after that. Psiĥedelisto (talk) 17:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The license has now been changed. Please refer to [9] for more information on the license. Thanks --Yash400 (talk) 17:27, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --MB-one (talk) 10:26, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough publication to be public domain PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 10:25, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily PD-US-Gov, Report written by a contractor or grantee.... ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: for now until claim that it is PD-US-1978-89 is proven otherwise. --P 1 9 9   13:52, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Finnusertop as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: KCNA photos are not "Current news reports". They have always been deleted at DR as copyvios. I consider this image is a part of the current news report, and not protected by copyright law. SCP-2000 06:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm including the following additional files in the nomination based on the discussion below: Finnusertop (talk) 01:03, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • First, according to North Korea copyright law, the law doesn't limit the kind of the current new report, so even photo, video, or any kind of media can be the current news report, and not protected by copyright law. Second, as I said that before, those photos are a part of the news. If those photos are not a part of the news, so why the news includes those photos? Third, the news is about the destruction of Inter-Korean Liaison office and the relationship between North Korea and South Korea. And those photos are about the destruction of the office. So those photos are related to the news, and that should be a part of the news. --SCP-2000 07:08, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep just to point out that, although only one file has been flagged, there are others in the series (same source, same Public Domain tag, and apparently all uploaded together):
  1. File:Before of the destruction of Inter-Korean Liaison Office (1).jpg in use
  2. File:Before of the destruction of Inter-Korean Liaison Office (2).jpg in use
  3. File:Destruction of Inter-Korean Liaison Office (1).jpg
  4. File:Destruction of Inter-Korean Liaison Office (2).jpg in use
  5. File:Destruction of Inter-Korean Liaison Office (3).jpg in use

The actual file under consideration is also in use in three articles. Presumably, if this file is found to be copyvio all the others would have to follow suit and also be deleted, especially if we are to follow precedents, as mentioned twice above. If this is to be seriously considered, notifications must be sent out re those pages to allow full participation in the discussion (as I was notified on my watchlist re this one). I will bow to others' far superior knowledge of the intricacies of copyright law, but my everyday interpretation of whether this photo constitutes a current news report is that it does. If photos are not "Current news reports" we would have to rename newspapers. Furthermore, these aren't photos of an obscure event. The destruction of the Inter-Korean liaison office appeared to gain widespread coverage in "the news". It could even be said that this is an historic event with potential ramifications yet to come. The fact 5 out of the 6 files uploaded are in use, would appear to support this view, that they are of high importance. To delete these files and deprive multiple articles would be a great loss in my humble opinion. To quote a different part of COM:PCP that my learned friend raised: a file should be deleted where there is "significant doubt" (emphasis in the original) as to the freedom of a particular file. I submit that the importance, previously mentioned, raises the bar of this significance to the limit. I therefore humbly conclude, in my opinion, that this threshold has not been reached in this case, and the file(s) should not be deleted. Thank you for your time in considering this. Crep171166 (talk) 23:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the files to the nomination. Finnusertop (talk) 01:03, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Crep171166 and SCP-2000: you can go over any of the other KCNA-related DR's to see why significant doubt has been cast in identical cases. Why is there a copyright notice on the KCNA website if no rights are attained? Why are photographs part of news items when the law doesn't say so? Why is it that people who actually read Korean have said that the law explicitly refers to texts? Why is it possible to make such maximalist readings based on what files you want to keep instead of what we actually know about the law? No one has ever provided a satisfactory answer to these questions. Finnusertop (talk) 00:59, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've added one more file. Finnusertop (talk) 01:59, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Finnusertop: First, "Copyright © 2000-2020 by www.kcna.kp" copyright notices does not means the content of the website is necessarily protected by copyright law. For example, the Taiwan observatory website which is under {{GWOIA}} released, or many of the simple graphic cases. In those cases, even the website have that copyright statement, but they are not protected by copyright law and have not copyright. Second, that discussion is not about "current news", and they were talking about "documents of State management such as ordinance". Third, that discussion is about COM:DW and COM:FOP and not about "current news". --SCP-2000 03:53, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Further to my previous comments, I am still of the opinion to keep. As stated, I am no expert so can only go on face value of the guidance; but sometimes it may be helpful to take a step-back from the intricacies and just go on what the policies state. To me, these pictures are de facto documents of current news as indeed I first saw this event on BBC news. DPRK provides a copyright exception in Article 12 of the North Korean Copyright Law in certain cases - one of them being documents of current news. As an analogy, this exception may have the same effect as the UK government releasing information which would otherwise be Crown copyright. The exception in this case takes the form of the Open Government Licence (OGL). For example, websites may be stamped with Crown copyright but the exception, via the OGL, makes it useable - see the page footer here. In any case, I am always guided by actual Commons policy. With reference to that link it seems to me that Commons views documents of news at not protected. There have been several intricate views put forward in various deletion requests over time, as my learned friend has kindly linked to above. Perhaps these debates would be better placed in some policy-discussion forum as "deletion requests are not the place to attempt to change Commons policy" (also so the really good points wouldn't risk getting lost!). It seems if there is confusion in this area the policy itself should be up for discussion, otherwise these Deletion Requests are always going to arise and go round the same circles. However, as it stands I feel the above Commons policy currently indicates this document of news is an exception to the general copyright rule and so should be kept accordingly. Thanks. Crep171166 (talk) 09:34, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  DeleteEven the files are considered public domain in North Korea, they are still copyrightable in the United States. Also refer to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:A1Cafel and Commons:Deletion requests/File:FNJ Terminal 2.jpg, where Article 5(2) of the Chinese copyright law also have similar provisions. Both were deleted due to being copyrightable in the United States.廣九直通車 (talk) 06:29, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --plicit 01:20, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]