Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/02/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:Μανωλης παπαδακης .jpg
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Permission was not given to sell this work. I did not know that was the standard rules when I uploaded this image C2ley (talk) 01:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Advert. Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:20, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 01:14, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Cut from magazine or website,copy right YenWitch (talk) 10:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
I did not cut this photo from no magazine / website. I took this photo myself. Vathlu (talk) 10:46, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Vathlu: I see that there is whitespace along the edge of the photo. It appears to be from rotation, rather than an artifact of scanning or other copyright violation, but this may be the reason for the DR. Would you crop the image? Guanaco (talk) 21:36, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: EXIF shows "Picasa". . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:37, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Stolen from a magazine or scarpbook, obviously scanned from an unknown source. 37.119.67.14 15:32, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 04:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kalpanawagle17 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Project scope.
- File:IN Delhi ncr Call Deep love 9999211002 Escorts Services Top Latest.jpg
- File:Are you looking 4 perfect night partner in Delhi? 9999211002 Delhi.jpg
- File:VIP CALL-GIRLS-SERVICE-IN-DELHI-NCR- DEEP 9999211002.jpg
Willy1018（talk） 15:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 04:08, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Docharkhesavaran 1325.jpg
Non-free image/No evidence to prove UnitedPowersTalk 13:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
- Evidence to prove? Black and white era. Please find another area to dig in.
Keep. --E4024 (talk) 08:05, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per E4024. Ruthven (msg) 22:35, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Docharkheh Savaran 1940s.jpg
Non-free image, Was Uploaded in farsi wikipedia/ copy right/ No evidence to prove UnitedPowersTalk 13:33, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Iran. Ruthven (msg) 22:30, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Taj Milz Cup 1969.jpg
Non-free image Uploaded in Farsi (Persian) Wikipedia UnitedPowersTalk 13:31, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Iran. Ruthven (msg) 22:28, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
NonFree Image in Farsi Wikipedia UnitedPowersTalk 13:30, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: old image. Ruthven (msg) 22:28, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Talebi1349.jpg
copy right- No evidence to prove UnitedPowersTalk 13:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: old image. Ruthven (msg) 22:28, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Iraj Danaeifard in Oghab.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:MIS Taj 1352.jpg
Non-free image, Was Uploaded in farsi wikipedia/copy right/No evidence to prove UnitedPowersTalk 13:34, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This is a pre-1979 image. Much more than 30 years. --E4024 (talk) 08:03, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per E4024. Ruthven (msg) 22:30, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Non-free image, Was Uploaded in farsi wikipedia/ copy right/ No evidence to prove UnitedPowersTalk 13:36, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This is a pre-1979 image. Much more than 30 years. --E4024 (talk) 08:02, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per E4024. Ruthven (msg) 22:30, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Taj and Shahin in 1956.jpg
Non-free image, Was Uploaded in farsi wikipedia/ copy right/ No evidence to prove UnitedPowersTalk 13:37, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: 1956 photograph, thus PDIran. Ruthven (msg) 22:35, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Non-free image, Was Uploaded in farsi wikipedia/ copy right UnitedPowersTalk 13:37, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 22:31, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Non-free image, Was Uploaded in farsi wikipedia/ copy right/ No evidence to prove UnitedPowersTalk 13:36, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Iran. Ruthven (msg) 22:32, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Non-free image, Was Uploaded in farsi wikipedia/ copy right UnitedPowersTalk 13:32, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Iran. Ruthven (msg) 22:29, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Daraei 1353.jpg
No evidence to prove- copy right UnitedPowersTalk 13:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: PD Iran. Ruthven (msg) 22:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
دزدیدهشده از مجله یا وبسایت (copyright) YenWitch (talk) 10:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
خیر قربان این عکس را خودم در ورزشگاه گرفتم. عکسهای قبل و بعد از این عکس موجود هست، لطفا بیدلیل تهمت نزنید. با تشکر Vathlu (talk) 11:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Please provide a name of a magazine or a link to something that shows this is copyright violation. Green Giant (talk) 18:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Should be deleted ActuaryGrayish (talk) 14:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- I hope so. Why did you upload it then? --E4024 (talk) 14:45, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request shortly after upload - make sure you wear clothes when experimenting with your camera. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted picture Fabienp (talk) 20:37, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:19, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
copyvio 131.111.216.60 14:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. This is not a copyright violation per COM:COA. I created this myself. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 20:07, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The Mistress and Fellows of Girton College own copyright - it is not free to be shared or to remix. 131.111.216.60 09:04, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- See above. They most certainly do not own the copyright to the coat of arms that I created. COM:COA applies. I created that file myself based on a blazon. That blazon is Quarterly vert and argent, a cross flory counterchanged between in the first and fourth quarters a roundel ermine and in the second and third quarters a crescent gules. I can legally create my own interpretation of what that coat of arms should look like and upload it to Commons. I did not steal any art from their site and post it - this is their version on the college website and FYI, I think mine is better and since I uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons, the university is free to use my version. Additionally, there are multiple copies of the arms already online in Category:Girton College, Cambridge so I don't know why you keep trying to delete only mine. Please familiarize yourself with how coats of arms are handled on Wikimedia Commons and stop creating frivolous deletion requests. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 04:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - The copyright for a CoA created from the blazon is owned by the creator, not the institution represented by the CoA. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wargaz as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: reason=Wrong image. 奏 don't have Western Zhou bronze (1046–771 BCE), the uploader uploaded Liushutong script (1627–1644 CE). Wrong image cannot illustrate anything but only can be misleading. All Wiktionaries and Han etym templates are using #ifexist function to display this file, so deleting it won't affect those pages. In contrast, the file will continuously display the wrong image because our templates highly depend on #ifexist function. Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:34, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Comment @Wargaz: The file was renamed to ACC-L24742.svg, does it mean the deletion request can be closed as kept? --Thibaut120094 (talk) 09:49, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Thibaut120094: , sure. I withdraw my deletion request. It said "Do not remove this tag until the deletion nomination is closed.", so I didn't remove the template. --Wargaz (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: File renamed. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Probably cropped from another picture that subjects to copyright Freshman404Talk 17:57, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Didym at 00:10, 17 Februar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 01:32, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
потому,что это фильм, из-за которого перенесли фильм Мстители: Война бесконечности 195.3.134.7 12:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: erroneous listing [rationale: "because this is the film that brought the film The Avengers: Infinity War"] —David Levy 14:56, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
The artist of the mural retains intellectual property rights... So images like this require the mural artist to have also released their rights under a free license.... They might have done so, but there is nothing in the metadata to indicate this... Geo Swan (talk) 00:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - and even if it is permanently displayed there is no FoP for that kind of work in Canada. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:47, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted by Disney. The design of a regular US dollar may be PD, but the drawings included on this note are not. De minimis also doesn't apply here. Uploaded from Flickr, where it has a CC license, but the Flickr user is not the copyright holder. Kam Solusar (talk) 00:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - the drawing whitch is the specificity here can not be De Minimis. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted by Disney. The design of a regular US dollar may be PD, but the drawings included on this note are not. De minimis also doesn't apply here. Uploaded from Flickr, where it has a CC license, but the Flickr user is not the copyright holder Kam Solusar (talk) 00:45, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: - the drawing whitch is the specificity here can not be De Minimis. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted by Disney. The design of a regular US dollar may be PD, but the drawings included on this note are not. De minimis also doesn't apply here. Uploaded from Flickr, where it has a CC license, but the Flickr user is not the copyright holder. Kam Solusar (talk) 00:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: - the drawing whitch is the specificity here can not be De Minimis. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Failed to upload a correct SVG. I uploaded a correct PNG version instead - see here: File:Steel-stats-greece-1980-2014.png Metallos (talk) 01:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - uploader request. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image of uploader). hiàn 02:15, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image of uploader; Commons is not Facebook). .
hiàn 02:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kamala joshi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal images of uploader).
hiàn 02:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image of uploader). hiàn 02:23, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Nexa9911 does not hold any personal connections with the Person in the picture. He is a well-known professional in his field. Must keep the image in Wikipedia Commons. It will be the most useful - next time a Wikipedia Article is created on him.--Nexa9911 (talk) 14:16, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- What do you mean by well-known professional? What field? Why should we keep the image if it is out of scope? Why isn't there an article already? hiàn 15:35, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+likely not own work (google has prior catches). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (personal image of uploader [uploader has no significant contributions to Wikimedia projects]). hiàn 02:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (personal image of uploader; uploader has no significant contributions to Wikimedia projects). hiàn 02:52, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 03:01, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 03:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 03:03, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Roby enomicks (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).
hiàn 03:15, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 02:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 03:20, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 02:09, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 04:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep My reaction to the nomination of Ðông is "Không", per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:37, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 04:10, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:38, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 04:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:38, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
A dark image, cannot see anything. B dash (talk) 04:13, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 04:13, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Yeap. The image is mine. You can delete it.--White DemΩn (talk) 09:56, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- I would say Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. But the creator seems to want it gone as well... --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
A dark image, cannot see anything. B dash (talk) 04:13, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: file fixed. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 02:29, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 04:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 04:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 04:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 04:27, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
My own upload. Wmr89502270 (talk) 04:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete. Personal file. Not used widely. (Only on a Wikisource page; which can be easily replaced.) Uploader request. --E4024 (talk) 06:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 04:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:42, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - just plain text - unused Not Responding... (talk) 04:38, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:42, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - just plain text - unused Not Responding... (talk) 04:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:42, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - just plain text - unused Not Responding... (talk) 04:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 04:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 04:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 04:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Also there is a watermark on the image. Could be taken from some place. --E4024 (talk) 08:18, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. As simply researching the watermark would determine it's origin, I tend to assume that the user added it themselves. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:45, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:46, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value Not Responding... (talk) 05:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT Not Responding... (talk) 05:28, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Academic Achievement in Grade 11 and 12 in k12 high school students in Public and Private School Influencing Parents Educational attainment.pdf
[edit]Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
File:WORK SATISFACTION AND RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN STAFF AT NAVAL STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY AND NSU BILIRAN CAMPUS LIBRARY.pdf
[edit]Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
File:DAMHIN ANG TURISMO AT SOSYO KULTURAL EPEKTO NITO – ANG PAG-AARAL NG PANANAW NG MGA RURAL NA KOMUNIDAD – SA BILIRAN ISLAND.pdf
[edit]Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Pag-aaral SA Agham Panlipunan at kasaysayan (may kinalaman sa mga isyu sa socio-cultural).pdf
[edit]Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Pagpapahalaga sa sarili Impluwensyang paniwala sa kagustuhan nang pag-iisip na kabilang ang mga Kabataan at mga mag-aaral.pdf
[edit]Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
File:TRABAHO KASIYAHAN AT RELASYON SA PAGITAN NG MGA KAWANI SA NAVAL STATE UNIVERSITY AT NSU BILIRAN CAMPUS LIBRARY.pdf
[edit]Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:32, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:33, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:37, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:38, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:49, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
non de-minimus SecretName101 (talk) 05:38, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - derivative work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:51, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:51, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:45, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:52, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:46, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:52, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:52, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:53, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:51, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:53, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Non-free image extracted from the web Mark the train (talk) 05:53, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:54, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:54, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:56, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:54, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:57, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:55, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 05:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:55, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 06:01, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:55, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 06:01, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:55, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 06:04, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:56, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Not Responding... (talk) 06:05, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Incnis Mrsi/dismiss without prejudice. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:54, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal type photos, out of scope
- File:Shihan noshanai with Mahdi zarbafi.jpg
- File:Mahdi zarbafi.jpg
- File:Mahdi zarbafi مهدی زربافی park.jpg
- File:Mahdi zarbafi takhte jamshid shiraz.jpg
- File:Mahdi zarbafi مهدی زربافی.jpg
- File:Mahdi zarbafi مهدی زربافی 1.jpg
- File:Konuichi-saghi-sazegari-by-Mahdi-Zarbafi.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 02:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Eduardo Leveck isn't mentioned in en.wiki. Small unused personal photo without metadata, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal image and unused logo of organization with unknown notability. Also, I suspect that the subject of the personal image is the uploader and it does not appear to be a selfie, so the chances are it is not "own work" as claimed.
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:13, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, non-notable event, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:21, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Image obviously copied from Facebook (see EXIF data). -- Túrelio (talk) 20:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:20, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Private photos, not used.
- File:2016-11-28-PHOTO-00015211 (1).jpg
- File:Andrew Williams Self Portrait.jpg
- File:Antho.jpg
- File:Bull gghani o.jpeg
- File:Devghar Nepal Tour देवघाट 1.jpg
- File:Devghar Nepal Tour देवघाट 2.jpg
- File:Devghar Nepal Tour देवघाट 3.jpg
- File:Devghar Nepal Tour देवघाट 4.jpg
- File:Shaswat Dham , Nawalparasi nepal 2.jpg
- File:Shaswat Dham , Nawalparasi nepal Online Recording.2.jpg
Kulmalukko (talk) 21:08, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:20, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khorami770 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:بروزادوبرف37.jpg
- File:بروزادوبرف35.jpg
- File:بروزادوبرف34.jpg
- File:بروزادوبرف32.jpg
- File:بروزادوبرف29.jpg
- File:بروزادوبرف11.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:00, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
This looks like a copyvio, but please check it better than I did. (https://joshuaproject.net/people_groups/12667/IR) E4024 (talk) 07:18, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - there are other publications too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:24, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:01, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:24, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:04, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+DW issues. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:25, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Raj Cinematographer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:RAJ CINEMATOGRAPHER (3).jpg
- File:RAJ CINEMATOGRAPHER (5).jpg
- File:RAJ CINEMATOGRAPHER.jpg
- File:RAJ CINEMATOGRAPHER (2).jpg
- File:RAJ CINEMATOGRAPHER (4).jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:08, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:30, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:10, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:30, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by محمد نعمان الهوي (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photos with photoshop and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:الموسوعه.jpg
- File:25659250 742727109249704 1835852135987420138 nغلاف.jpg
- File:ضياء محمد نعمان الهوي.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:33, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:15, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:34, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:34, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:34, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ashok Palem (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Commons is not your Webhost
- File:Futurejustinbieber.jpg
- File:Futurejustinbieber India.jpg
- File:Futurejustinbieber Indai.jpg
- File:Futurejustinbieber.png
- File:Futurejustinbieber Indai.png
Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:59, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:37, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:04, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:37, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:06, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:39, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mansouraminpour (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:07, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:39, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:40, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:43, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:43, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:15, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:44, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:44, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Image published on Twitter, probably not free Shev123 (talk) 09:52, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:46, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
By mistake I have uploaded a set of images in the same file name. They are all stacking up one top of another. Hence need to delete this so that I can upload them in a separate file name Jegan 10:13, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 13:45, 21 Februar 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file: By mistake I have uploaded a set of images in the same file name. They are all stacking up one top of another. Hence need to delete all these so that I can upload them in a separate file name --Krdbot 19:28, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted album cover. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:56, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Photograph of a publication which is copyrighted unless there is evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cristina vargas vasquez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, out of scope. Some copyvios as well since author is also the subject.
- File:Sesión fotográfica Cristina vargas.jpg
- File:Modelaje Cristina vargas.png
- File:Fotografía publicada para campaña.png
- File:Sesión fotográfica Cristina vargas.png
- File:Sesión Cristina vargas.png
- File:Escritura Creativa en el Claustro de Sor Juana.jpg
- File:Visitar la basílica en octubre.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:10, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal vacation photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Failed upload, superseded by File:BR42.jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:51, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:54, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:55, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Text-only screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:55, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Private photos, not used.
- File:2013-265-119 Brooklyn Breakfast (8690660481).jpg
- File:HdQ7bFktm1Q.jpg
- File:PEOPLE - Acoma Girl - May 1971 - stan and belle lucero's girl -01 (11117645405).jpg
- File:PEOPLE - RVN - 19 (11117784244).jpg
- File:PEOPLE - Zuni Girl (11117896363).jpg
- File:PEOPLE - Zuni Girl -01 (11117716085).jpg
- File:PEOPLE - Zuni Girl -03 (11117754976).jpg
- File:Rodolfo Quintero Noguera.jpg
- File:SAJIN LAL.jpg
- File:Un amigo de años cronista.jpg
- File:Una finisima amiga.jpg
- File:William Sønsteby.jpg
Kulmalukko (talk) 22:03, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 22:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
This is a derivative work of a non-free painting. The artist David Harrison Wright is still alive so the painting is copyrighted cannot be republished in a photograph without permission. De728631 (talk) 22:08, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:57, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:40, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Maybe too overexposed and unclear to be educationally usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:36, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Too unclear to be educationally usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:35, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Maybe too blurred to be educationally usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:20, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:35, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Too blurred. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:27, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:32, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Falsche Spielerin, falscher Dateiname Lokomotive74 (talk) 22:38, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and uploader request. --Hystrix (talk) 20:28, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Website content might have been cc-by 3.0, but images such as the twitter logo is not. It is intentionally included, therefore not de minims. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Josve05a: I understood. SNS logos are at bottom left, and the logos are bit high resolution. Although I simply captured the page, I agree this is not good. I uploaded new site screenshot from current website. It would not contain controversial part. Would you please check new one? --Was a bee (talk) 09:41, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- I uploaded new one as File:NIF Screen shot 2018-02-15.png. --Was a bee (talk) 09:50, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- I agree with this deletion proposal--Was a bee (talk) 09:55, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:25, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Too blurred to be educationally usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:49, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:09, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Too blurred/dark to be educationally usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:51, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:09, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
(c) Paolo Capponi, missing permission, out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:53, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
akjhjlhhkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk Adel1990ww (talk) 23:07, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
werwerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Adel1990ww (talk) 23:10, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request. --Hystrix (talk) 20:02, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Automatic upload from Flickr. It's someone's personal joke art, containing no educational value; it not a useful image of the bird species and it will never be used on any projects. Out of scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:33, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails to meet COM:SCOPE unless someone can explain the dialogue, and probably still fails anyway. --Closeapple (talk) 10:13, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:56, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Copy of https://www.facebook.com/labasu1/photos/a.265723513512273.65385.118159984935294/1583156175102327/?type=3&theater, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:37, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- We have written permission, how do we send it to you? Sofran18 (talk) 14:14, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Sofran18: Authorization from the photographer is to be sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:01, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:54, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Copy of https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/952523072237600768/BwmQZ9Ek.jpg. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:52, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Similar to https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1862319187143459&set=a.142872192421509.18907.100000961882086&type=3&theater, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:51, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded with nonsense name and properly renamed now. Uoaei1 (talk) 19:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: fresh upload, redirect can be deleted. --JuTa 02:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded with nonsense name and properly renamed now. Uoaei1 (talk) 19:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: fresh upload. --JuTa 02:24, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Likely not own work: inconsistent styles, quality, and sizes. Several images with watermarks. Montages have no credits for the individual images.
- File:Tejedora-Palma.jpg
- File:Trigarante.jpg
- File:Yucuañe01.jpg
- File:Xiuhpohualli02.jpg
- File:Tnuyuku Ñuhu-Ndekuu.jpg
- File:SMA02.jpg
- File:Rio-grande SMA.jpg
- File:Fuego-nuevo.jpg
- File:Cruz-quetzal.jpg
- File:J-Ceron.png
- File:Ixca Nde1.png
- File:H-Sma.png
- File:Convent03.png
- File:Cristal0.png
- File:Cinta01.png
- File:Tnuyucu Ñuhu-Ndeku.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:05, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:02, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal or promotional photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:06, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:36, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal or promotional photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:08, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal or promotional photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:12, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 17:13, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 17:17, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
From Category:Personal files from panoramio. IMHO too personal. Is there any notable person here? E4024 (talk) 15:07, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:02, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal file in Category:Personal files from panoramio. No need, as we have better pics of the waterfall. E4024 (talk) 15:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Shizhao at 08:02, 23 Februar 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - --Krdbot 13:26, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 03:04, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:25, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 03:05, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:25, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 03:07, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:25, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 03:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 03:13, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 03:13, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 03:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 03:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Not educationally useful - low-quality doodle that is unlikely to be useful. hiàn 03:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Barakat Qrtas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope : self promotions. The images are used in personal pages however the user is not an active participant of our projects, its only contributions are for self promotions.
- File:Logo Barakat.png
- File:Bqrtas.jpg
- File:بهرهكات قورتاس - Barakat Qrtas.jpg
- File:Barakat Qrtas.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Madhukar vajpayee (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:25, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Madhugowda123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photos/selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:Madhu J Gowda 4.jpg
- File:Madhu J Gowda 15.jpg
- File:Madhu J Gowda 14.jpg
- File:Madhu J Gowda 13.jpg
- File:Madhu J Gowda 12.jpg
- File:Madhu J Gowda 11.jpg
- File:Madhu J Gowda 10.jpg
- File:Madhu J Gowda 9.jpg
- File:Madhu J Gowda 8.jpg
- File:Madhu J Gowda 7.jpg
- File:Madhu J Gowda 6.jpg
- File:Madhu J Gowda 5.jpg
- File:Madhu J Gowda 1.jpg
- File:Madhu J Gowda 2.jpg
- File:Madhu J Gowda 3.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 10:23, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- This was written on the discussion page
These files have been used and should not be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madhugowda123 (talk • contribs) 09:19, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Now they were put into use after this DR was filed. I still feel these should be deleted as these are your only contributions other than the main image used on your userpage which was in use before this was filed. These are mostly all selfies and Re COM:SELFIE and COM:INUSE The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project. As these are your only contributions on Commons and your only contributions on en:wp are on your user page I don't feel that meets the standard of "active participant". Please note I didn't nominate every image you uploaded. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 10:43, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom @Sixflashphoto: : the concern over such photos has been somewhat addressed by the community... see Sixflashphoto's link in the above comment. Although these additions might subsequently be claimed to have been added to a user page in good faith after DR filing, I believe the contrary. I have seen this type of thing on a (small) number of user pages, seemingly a tactic used to circumvent what is reasonably allowed, so to attempt a repository of personal social-media-style photies. Acabashi (talk) 13:22, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Madhugowda123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo, out of scope, currently used on a promotional user page tagged for deletion
Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
actualites Francisdelagodet (talk) 08:10, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 12:39, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Original author or uploader requests deletion of unused file. ~riley (talk) 03:26, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
actualites Francisdelagodet (talk) 08:10, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 12:39, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 03:26, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
actualites Francisdelagodet (talk) 08:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 12:43, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 03:26, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
fran6gionges n'existe plus Francisdelagodet (talk) 07:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 15:52, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
actualites Francisdelagodet (talk) 08:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 12:39, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 03:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
fran6gionges n'existe plus Francisdelagodet (talk) 07:33, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 15:52, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
actualites Francisdelagodet (talk) 08:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 12:39, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 03:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
fran6gionges n'existe plus Francisdelagodet (talk) 07:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 15:52, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
actualites Francisdelagodet (talk) 08:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 12:39, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 03:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
fran6gionges n'existe plus Francisdelagodet (talk) 07:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 15:52, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
actualites Francisdelagodet (talk) 08:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 12:39, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 03:28, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
fran6gionges n'existe plus Francisdelagodet (talk) 07:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 15:52, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
actualites Francisdelagodet (talk) 08:13, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason for deletion. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 12:43, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 03:28, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sony Xperia Z2.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Xperia XZ.png
Files of User:Eyebot
[edit]- File:Faraz Haider Andher.jpg
- File:Farazhaider2.jpg
- File:Farazhaider3.jpg
- File:Farazhaider2.png
- File:Farazhaider3.png
- File:Farazhaider7.png
- File:Farazhaider8.png
- File:Farazhaider9.png
The first 3 are screenshots of this YouTube video, the next 2 are from this YouTube video, and the next 3 are from this YouTube video; the videos all have a standard YouTube license, which is not compatible with Commons. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Speedy delete as copyright violations ALH (talk) 19:47, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:30, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hotelduquesa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files uploaded probably by a promotional account, some taken from the official hotel site, other can be found elsewhere on the web, dated before uploading to Commons eg. [1] or [2].
- File:Hotel near port of Barcelona.jpg
- File:Views from Duquesa de Cardona hotel to the port.jpg
- File:Barcelona-port-hotel-cruise.jpg
- File:Hotel-near-the-port-barcelona.jpg
- File:Hotel near the port of Barcelona Duquesa de Cardona.jpg
- File:Hotel port Barcelona Duquesa de Cardona.jpg
- File:Luxury boutique hotel Barcelona Duquesa de Cardona.jpg
- File:Duquesa de Cardona boutique hotel Barcelona.jpg
- File:Hotel Duquesa de Cardona boutique hotel Barcelona.jpg
- File:Boutique hotel Barcelona Duquesa de Cardona.jpg
- File:Hotel boutique Duquesa de Cardona Barcelona.jpg
- File:Hotel boutique Duquesa de Cardona Barcelona in front of the port.jpg
~Cybularny Speak? 11:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:30, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:31, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope, used on a blank user page, not a valid user Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:31, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal type photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 12:08, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:31, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope, currently used on a blank page, not a valid user Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:31, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope, currently used on a promotion user page which I have tagged for deletion Gbawden (talk) 12:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:31, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
poor quality, blurry, unused Hiddenhauser (talk) 12:33, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
I would like this photo deleted please. I will update it with a new picture Glenn Querl (talk) 12:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
useless and poor quality duplicate of File:Mania Shochat 22.jpg H4stings (talk) 13:27, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
The corporate logo isn't allowed to be used and changed from third parties. Rosenbauer (talk) 13:55, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Disagree with the rationale in the nomination but it is unused and there is a svg version. (here). ALH (talk) 00:33, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:31, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
The corporate logo isn't allowed to be used and changed from third parties. Rosenbauer (talk) 13:55, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Keep Satifies PD:Textlogo. Only a simple textshape. P. S. Burton (talk) 15:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Keep As long as the closer is comfortable with this usage of the pd-textlogo tag, it should probably be kept given its usage at multiple projects. ALH (talk) 21:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 03:31, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Accidentally uploaded - tested the editor. DieZBW (talk) 14:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Collage. Needs source and license for each and every pic. E4024 (talk) 14:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted image. See https://www.facebook.com/KartikAaryanOfficial/photos/a.224908384372795.1073741832.166281193568848/731339527063009/?type=3 Krimuk2.0 (talk) 14:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Collage. Needs source and license for each and every pic. E4024 (talk) 14:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted image. See https://www.facebook.com/KartikAaryanOfficial/photos/a.224908384372795.1073741832.166281193568848/731339527063009/?type=3 Krimuk2.0 (talk) 14:18, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted image. See https://filmfare.wwmindia.com/photogallery/2016/Jul/4_1469013447_616x462.jpg Krimuk2.0 (talk) 14:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
I normally do not look at the name of the uploader before DRs, but this time I happened to see the name and still -somehow- have the courage to propose this deletion, although in unrest. Half face pic of a woman smoking. It is not in scope at all. Therefore why do I worry? I'm not doing anything wrong by DR'ing this unused and -IMHO- unnecessary file. I hope the uploader stays silent or agrees with me. Thanks. Note: If the file is not deleted, somehow, please categorize it. E4024 (talk) 14:24, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep High quality portrait, illustrative of smoking, being dressed in black so in scope. As for the pointy nomination, it's pointy, pointedly worded to target me. Don't do that, it's called hounding when you have done it several times and it's a misuse of the DR process. --Fæ (talk) 14:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Per Fæ. Half face pic of a woman smoking. It is in scope all the way, as this is a high quality image of said act. Also a file not being in use is not a reason to delete, otherwise tens of millions of files would had to be deleted. Tm (talk) 22:13, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Per Fae. ~riley (talk) 03:33, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
While we allow a limited number of personal images for the user pages of active contributors, "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook. See COM:SCOPE.. This user has no edits except an out of scope gallery here and a one line user page on WP:EN. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:33, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused, out of scope personal file. E4024 (talk) 15:20, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:33, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Severian2525 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Kilmer Argo staff JPEG.jpg
- File:Kilmer Argo staff.pdf
- File:Dr. David Heinlein at Elm Farm.pdf
- File:Play scene 1890s.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep for Kilmer Argo staff JPEG.jpg. I've added the correct licence. --Ras67 (talk) 03:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: / Kept for file listed above. ~riley (talk) 03:34, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:34, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:Fig-SQZspektrum D RS.jpg
- File:Fig-SqueezedShotNoise D RS.jpg
- File:Fig-SQZspektrum.pdf
- File:GequetschtesLicht-5D-RS.jpg
- File:Squeezing-5E-RS.jpeg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:34, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
عکس قدیمی است M.hengame4 (talk) 15:45, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Check his contribs. What he says here is "old photo". - Alexis Jazz 14:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Tasnim photo with license review. SlowManifesto (talk) 00:13, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 03:34, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:34, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Claimed CC0, but the source website does not show the same license and their terms of service are quite strict. MKFI (talk) 15:54, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.magazina.al/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/selim-Pacolli.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SilveradoTX (talk · contribs)
[edit]All these files have source and author given as "Traxxas" (manufacturer) with CC0 license. There is no proof that the manufacturer has given such a license, and many of these images seem to have been taken from the web. File:Courtney Force Pomona.jpg contains "Copyright holder © 2015 Auto Imagery, Inc." in EXIF.
- File:7107 wheelie.jpg
- File:70054-ComboAction.jpg
- File:Aton Flying.jpg
- File:TRX33.jpg
- File:64077-3-XO-1-action-white.jpg
- File:5707 red front race.jpg
- File:5708 B5R7167.jpg
- File:5708 red front race.jpg
- File:57046-4-M41-4SST2354.jpg
- File:67086-1-Stampede4x4VXL-Action-Front.jpg
- File:3707-3708 wheelie rght drt.jpg
- File:3605 action rear.jpg
- File:2405 dirt action.jpg
- File:58044-1 Gordini Action Sand.jpg
- File:X-Maxx-Action-Blue-Jump.jpg
- File:X-Maxx with E-Maxx.jpg
- File:68086-21-Slash-3 Wide-jumping.jpg
- File:68086-21-Slash-47-Corner-Action.jpg
- File:56076-1-Summit-Snow-Red.jpg
- File:56085-E-Revo-Brushless-Action-Mud.jpg
- File:5309 action 01.jpg
- File:3908-Action-Wheelie-Blue.jpg
- File:4907 tmaxx action1.jpg
- File:Courtney Force Denver.jpg
- File:Traxxas Short Course Truck.jpg
- File:Traxxas Slash with Traxxas Short Course Truck.jpg
- File:Traxxas Building.jpg
- File:Courtney Force Pomona.jpg
MKFI (talk) 16:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Fizped as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7, No premission from Artist of award — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete This is artwork (statuette) → also protected. No premission from Artist → the photo must be deleted.
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
my personal image Liviu.concioiu (talk) 16:45, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
my personal image 188.24.171.31 16:06, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:36, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Former Mozilla Firefox logos
[edit]See Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Firefox.svg or the Mozilla Firefox Identity Guidelines. The logo-related files in the distributions of Firefox 3.5 and later are under the Mozilla tri-license (although trademarked). They differ from these older versions. These older logos (prior to 3.5) are copyrighted and should be deleted.
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:36, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Variant Mozilla Firefox logos
[edit]per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Former Mozilla Firefox logos. These are derivatives of prior-3.5 logos.
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:32, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:36, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Former Mozilla Firefox logos. Pre-3.5 logo. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:36, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:36, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
I'm unsure of the species, also overexposed photograph with purple spots ThayneT (talk) 18:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:37, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Photo was not actually taken by me, but copied from Chinese seller on Ebay- though China has no copyright laws, I still don't think it should be used ThayneT (talk) 18:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:37, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal or promotional photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:18, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:37, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Looks like a derivative/scan, not own work. And unusable low quality. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:37, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:20, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:37, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:37, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:37, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Low quality "art" images of a non-notable person. Not used.
- File:FUNKY STUFF (808327518).jpg
- File:FUNKY STUFF (808327574).jpg
- File:FUNKY STUFF (808386372).jpg
- File:FUNKY STUFF (808386404).jpg
- File:FUNKY STUFF (808386684).jpg
- File:FUNKY STUFF (808386708).jpg
- File:FUNKY STUFF (808423132).jpg
- File:FUNKY STUFF (808423162).jpg
- File:FUNKY STUFF (808423230).jpg
Kulmalukko (talk) 21:33, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:38, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
All rights reserved on Flickr. Unreviewed. ~Cybularny Speak? 22:27, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:38, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Private photos, not used.
- File:2011-365-331 Getting Close to the Soul of the Theremin (6410903381).jpg
- File:2012-366-203 Looking Our Over Oak Creek Canyon (7626813444).jpg
- File:@dailyshoot- 2010-07-10- Who are you? Make a self portrait today and show the rest of us what you look like. -ds237 (4781996076).jpg
- File:@dailyshoot- 2010-10-10- Create a photograph with a distinctly asymmetrical composition today. Pick your subject carefully to go with the theme. -ds329 (5069361629).jpg
- File:Acompañado con dos grandes amigos.jpg
- File:Alan and Westley (1803794787).jpg
- File:Alan at the Beach (1711079653).jpg
- File:Alan is Happy Now (1614732715).jpg
- File:Aussie Tour 2007 (1711209495).jpg
- File:Aussie Tour 2007 (1711937436).jpg
- File:Aussie Tour 2007 (1774724673).jpg
- File:Aussie Tour 2007 (1805020312).jpg
- File:Australia July 2008 (2678690447).jpg
- File:CogDogRoo Reaches End of the Speaking Trail (1789344986).jpg
- File:Danielthillerup.jpg
- File:Despite all of his public proclamations, we all know, deep in his depressed little bava boy heart, that http-bavatuesdays.com- really has a hot desire for an iPad. (4476548051).png
- File:Getting Help From Twitter (1711135667).jpg
- File:Hawaiin Dreams Come True (5342547988).jpg
- File:I Need To Twitter (1711912048).jpg
- File:In Old Montreal (6601909695).jpg
- File:Just to provide I was there (yes, I know with Photoshop there is no real proof anymore) (2888292975).jpg
- File:Kathleen is a Happy Winner (2657268642).jpg
- File:Let Larry Out of Gaol (2653017852).jpg
Kulmalukko (talk) 22:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Too unclear to be educationally usable.
- File:Newtown Street Blur View (1774707315).jpg
- File:Newtown Street Blur View (1774708743).jpg
- File:Newtown Street Blur View (1775551066).jpg
- File:Painted By Autumn Leaves (8058297926).jpg
Kulmalukko (talk) 22:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Private photos, not used.
- File:My host here in Hobart, Best scotch selection anywhere. (6471616475).jpg
- File:My last day in Australia began with a 6am rowing trip under the Sydney Harbor bridge, thanks to my new friend Westley Field. (1795916021).jpg
- File:On the Red Couch (6452593029).jpg
- File:On the Trail (1804641248).jpg
- File:On the trail in the Blue Mountains (1804642820).jpg
- File:One More Tweet, I Swear (1711063149).jpg
- File:Pictures of 2011 Week in Paradise 2011 (5342606612).jpg
- File:Ready for a Night Out (5342003151).jpg
- File:Sean Speaks For the Pocast (1788549039).jpg
- File:Shivam Goswami .jpg
- File:Steph and Robyn skipped the train - (1789446078).jpg
- File:Studying the Wine List (5342004213).jpg
- File:Taking in the View (1788567985).jpg
- File:The Podcast Continues (1789399774).jpg
- File:The Sunset is THERE! (5341933871).jpg
- File:The Wood-Pen Story (5749003725).jpg
- File:Time to Record a Podcast (1788544653).jpg
- File:Top of the Dune to Ya! (2810682018).jpg
- File:Two Weeks Down Under (6452460935).jpg
- File:Two Weeks Down Under (6452521409).jpg
- File:Watching Dolphins (5342557120).jpg
- File:We are not so blue! (2687558777).jpg
- File:We're Not Talking About Second Life (1788484683).jpg
- File:Week in Paradise 2011 (5341933009).jpg
- File:Week in Paradise 2011 (5342599448).jpg
- File:Westley Makes a Point (1788485873).jpg
- File:What to Do on the Beach? (1711088399).jpg
Kulmalukko (talk) 22:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
© Senate of Canada, non-commercial use (https://sencanada.ca/en/important-notices/) Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:23, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- (transfered from a wrong page) This request is should be fulfilled. Please review what the The Canadian Senate's own website states. Source: https://sencanada.ca/en/important-notices/
- Non-Commercial Reproduction of Other Content
Unless otherwise specified, non-parliamentary documents are made available on our website with the intent that they be readily available for personal and public non-commercial use. You may reproduce these documents, either in whole or in part and by any means, without charge or further permission from us, provided that
- due diligence is exercised in ensuring the accuracy of the material reproduced;
- the Senate of Canada is identified as the author and the complete title (when available) is included;
- it is indicated that the reproduction is a copy of the version available on the Senate of Canada Website at [URL where original document is available];
- the reproduction is not represented as an official version of the material reproduced, nor as having been made in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the Senate of Canada or the Senator(s) concerned, if applicable; and
- the material is not used in a way that would compromise its accuracy and integrity or undermine the dignity of the Senate of Canada, Senate Committees or Senators.
Source: https://sencanada.ca/en/important-notices/
This image should not be removed as the Senate of Canada's own website states that this type of usage (using it on a Wikipedia page, for example) is acceptable. --Saum1 (talk) 23:05, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Saum1: There's a misunderstanding : commercial use of a picture put on Commons must be authorized. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:28, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: uploading for non-commercial use is not allowed in Wikimedia Commons. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:34, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
画像のトリミング未処理ですので削除をお願いします。 江戸村のとくぞう (talk) 06:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion on the day of upload. --Yasu (talk) 15:24, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyright information is printed clearly on the image itself. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 21:37, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ano Nyymi as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7 — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - This is a good photo that should be nominated at COM:QIC. What's the rationale for deletion? Is "G7" a rationale? What does it mean? Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:38, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- Support - I'm lost. Why wasn't it speedily deleted in the first place? "7. Author or uploader request deletion: Original author or uploader requests deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content." See Commons:SPEEDY. Manelolo (talk) 11:15, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
- Looking at it further, the uploader apparently requested to delete the picture within 3 hours of uploading it and the account has made no other contributions before or after that. A courtesy should apply then at least, regardless of other facts? See Commons:Courtesy deletions. Manelolo (talk) 11:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as per Manelolo and COM:CSD#G7. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:11, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
evraa delegation 110.54.222.7 00:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep I don't understand the rationale and i see furthermore no reason for deletion. --Ras67 (talk) 00:52, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:12, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Replaced by updated file. See here: File:Steel-stats-greece-1980-2014.png Metallos (talk) 01:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Comment The replacement is the same image. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: superseded by File:Greece-steel-production-stats-1980-2017.png. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 03:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Comment – He can be found on the internet as Muhammad Bey or Muhammad N.Bey. Apart from being self publicist, and Entrepreneur. He's a youtuber and former consul for Sierrea Leone. He's crowd funding a film Series about Ideas on how black people can go back to an African Country. He seems to be going in the direction of becoming notable. --BeckenhamBear (talk) 10:22, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
- Then the file can be deleted nonetheless. Assuming the author is "Muhammad Bey", this would also signify being the subject of the image. Being the subject and uploader of the image usually means authorship is not the uploader's, but another's. If that was the case, permission would have to be sent to OTRS. hiàn 04:18, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:41, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
A dark image, cannot see most of the beach view in Praia da Luz. B dash (talk) 04:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Image taken at night. Tm (talk) 23:21, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Tm. No other night images in its category. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:42, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Douplicate. See File:Felsőereki gémeskút.jpg -- ato (talk) 06:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Incorrect Map of India. 165.225.106.84 06:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Moreover, it's in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
India Map is altered and should be updated to reflect the correct map of India with Jammu and Kashmir 106.201.47.124 12:58, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:48, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 19:05, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
replaced by 1874 German Transit of Venus Expedition III to Auckland Island, 001.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 06:34, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:53, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
I'm bringing this file to discussion because it has been uploaded as an "own work". Of course it is not an own work. I "guess" it is old enough to cover with some license, but which? Who knows more about this gentleman? Would PD-Ottoman Empire help or not? Is this something pre 1923? First published in Iran, where? Who can help? E4024 (talk) 07:07, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: dubious source and author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:59, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Theinstantmatrix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:LL|source=http://www.bignewslive.com/english/nobody-is-subordinate-to-me-ma-yusuf-ali/2/
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion, as the uploader has objected. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Comment It's true that the publication at http://www.bignewslive.com/english/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/yusafali2.jpg predates the release on Flickr for 2 years. However, the Flickr account seems to belong to the publishing company bignewslive.com, where by the release on Flickr might be legitimate. On the other hand it smells a bit fishy that this Flickr-account has started in 2018 and has just 1 upload, so it might be a fake and not associated with bignewslive.com. --Túrelio (talk) 08:49, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Yes , that's the comment i intended to say AyaanLamar (talk) 08:53, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Appears to be COM:LL. The Flickrstream is gone. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:39, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:00, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Some doubts about ownership, claimed by uploader. The same image had been published far earlier than to Commons at http://www.dcmilitary.com/pentagram/news/local/d-c-national-guard-welcomes-new-commanding-general/article_76c181bb-db35-58d9-9456-07eb0da410b5.html and has been credited as "Official D.C. National Guard photo". Thereby it might be PD-US-Gov. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Good point! I've fixed the source and license information; apparently, the mishap might had been caused by a lack of experience. --Taterian (talk) 23:40, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: fixed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:01, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiuKfVdjoMRv06bcBAKC_1hpmPgY7xqUi5L1hyehHHhAJiznRx70nFgXb2QU2otbdSpzx0C96SyMLVSou5-_1SfMcLoNxNHtI6NiwQ1ZIzMKJb6tp-f2-tytQ0NkZNkv37KukpeYh6crUmGvvDVkxsJvawMWtwecOGDx924dNn39uBeEPJ3PN5xwl-5T0MDr0bGv2t7MfTBQKrrmX733BG8X_1K6ZlPq9sBcH6MWu9tDreEE002HIoxduR7m8z3U4Sl3EEntxVt2RBd-dX8BRZEe3XaPcDr4E4bfBQXWLvstmIYVdyYEjAsJwkkBJ-Z0Q441xqT6FiDHZxHLNwP3I7gp8jisUKz6w Clutching (talk) 17:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Non-free image/No evidence to prove. UnitedPowersTalk 13:41, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Unclear scan of two stork images, the extracted files are available seperately. -- Deadstar (msg) 10:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:06, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Getty Images agency claims this image as their own (see watermark in first uploaded file version) and offers it for their regular fees [3]. As they are well known to pursue copyright-violators in court, it should be discussed whether we really can host this image without risk for re-users. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:52, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- I've uploaded clear version, without watermark, please close. --Shakko (talk) 10:54, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- You removed the watermark from the first version, right? (see Commons:Watermarks#Legal_issues_with_the_removal_of_watermarks) --Túrelio (talk) 10:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- no, I've found the original version of file, stolen by getty, and uploaded it. 1st one can be erased if you wish so. --Shakko (talk) 21:40, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- Regrettably, one word (XOPOC) in the lower middle part is cut a bit. --Túrelio (talk) 21:46, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- no, I've found the original version of file, stolen by getty, and uploaded it. 1st one can be erased if you wish so. --Shakko (talk) 21:40, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- You removed the watermark from the first version, right? (see Commons:Watermarks#Legal_issues_with_the_removal_of_watermarks) --Túrelio (talk) 10:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. I would think that the ruling of Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. applies as well. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:12, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
First: This is not a work of: US Dept. of Energy. 84.157.19.93 10:54, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
© eye of science Title is wrong, too. This is Geobacter metallireducens 84.157.19.93 10:55, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- At the time of upload it was on a US Government site credited to the US Department of Energy under a public domain license, hence the credit and public domain license. But since the source link is dead now it can be deleted for lack of evidence of the public domain license. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:05, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. It seems the IP contributor is right, see larger version with copyright notice here. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Poor quality, orphaned. Leyo 10:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Incorrectly licensed. Scanning a picture does not make it freely licensed. Yoninah (talk) 11:05, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
The detailed disclaimer contains directives that are not compatible with Commons licensing or the Creative Commons license attached to it by the uploader. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Uploader indicates this is a picture of himself and it cannot be 'own work', needs to credit the photographer and obtain permission to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
The metadata states "Author: Brad Inglis" and "Copyright holder: © Brad Inglis (UBPICS)". This does not appear to be the uploader; need permission from "Brad" to license a copyrighted photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:57, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:23, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal file. Got a week to show you are a Wikipedian and be able to keep a pic. E4024 (talk) 15:28, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No meaningful contributions. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:26, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused file. Doesn't look like an own work either. Other uploads of the same user must also be checked. E4024 (talk) 15:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Photo uploaded by the subject by his own admission (it:Luigi_Braco, speedy deleted), so we need the photographer's authorisation. However, the subject is not notable, which rises doubts about any eventual EDUSE. Ruthven (msg) 15:59, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:05, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Warning issued to uploader. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:36, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
User's only contribution. Unlikely to be own work, seems like photo from monitor/screen. Possible copyvio. ~ 83.220.239.237 18:15, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:38, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
While the photo might be own work (and it is Facebook sized), the painting isn't. COM:OTRS permission would be needed from the artist to retain. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:38, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
wrong license, seems to be a copyright violation, small resolution Carl Ha (talk) 19:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:40, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
A research paper, which is out of scope at Commons. Could be transferred to wikisource but the information about the paper is not clear. The uploader doesn't say where it is from; if they mean to say they wrote the paper, then Wiki projects are not a good place to publish their own work. If it has been previously published as suggested, the copyright status needs to be indicated; most journals have copyright rules or a clear Creative Commons license. Unless that's cleared up this should be deleted. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 20:10, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:42, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Redundant, blurred. Superseded by a bit sharper photo File:Первомайская школа-10.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:42, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
self promotion Cabayi (talk) 21:38, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:43, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Invalid license Guy 23:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Why? Apparently there was a license change for Agência Brasil images, but that took place in 2017. This image is from 2007, 10 years before. --Rosenzweig τ 11:12, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Rosenzweig. Incomplete deletion rationale. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:46, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Did the creator of this artwork license it freely? Leoboudv (talk) 06:03, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hi @Leoboudv: . I'm not sure what are you asking about? Maybe about the construction or the photo? The sculpture is made every year (a new one, of course) and it burns every 11 May. All citizens can go to the beach and take photos, and this one is taken from City Hall members.--Yuanga (talk) 07:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: If the sculpture is not copyrightable than Commons can keep it Yuanga. I don't have a strong view on it either way but feel an Admin should decide on this 3D art object. Goodnight from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:18, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: FOP in Spain anyways. Ruthven (msg) 23:57, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Rita Martin
[edit]Rita Martin (1875-1958) , British photographer. Copyright violations
- File:Gladys Cooper by Rita Martin, c. 1910.jpg
- File:Lily Brayton.jpg
- File:Lily Elsie.jpg
- File:Rita Martin.jpg
- File:Rosamund Massy.jpg
Mutter Erde (talk) 08:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- this DR is wrong the licence PD-1923 states that photos taken BEFORE 1923 ANYWHERE are in PUBLIC DOMAIN in the United States. All the above photos are taken in the 1900s-1910s. Regards, --Elisa Rolle 12:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- BTW see what is written in the RITA MARTIN page on Wikimedia "Works of this artist first published before 1923 can be uploaded to English Wikipedia (see en:Template:PD-US-1923-abroad). For more information, see Commons:Licensing and Commons:Derivative works." So why there is a DR on this photos? --Elisa Rolle 12:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Elisa.rolle: it’s not when the photos were taken that counts for PD-1923, but when they were published. Moreover Commons (unlike enWP) requires media to be free in both the USA and the country of origin. In this case it would appear the photographer’s estate or heirs will hold UK copyrights until 2029.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 20:45, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Gladys Cooper, Lily Brayton and Lily Elsie were taken as publicity postcard for their works as actresses, and published in the 1900s-1910s. Rosamund Massy was taken as a private card (they were the old version of the visit card of today) back when she was a suffrage movement leader in the 1910s. The self-portrait was done as promotional material of her work. All published way before 1923. And I think there is even a specific rule somewhere about publicity works, but at this point I do not have time to search for it. The notice: "Works of this artist first published before 1923 can be uploaded to English Wikipedia (see en:Template:PD-US-1923-abroad). For more information, see Commons:Licensing and Commons:Derivative works." is on Wikimedia, not Wikipedia. How you can upload a work on "English Wikipedia" without passing from Wikimedia? if there is a way, please move the photos on Wikipedia; if not proceed deleting them. I have already decided I do not want to collaborate with Wikimedia and Wikipedia anymore, therefore I will not follow this topic anymore. Do what is best and right. --Elisa Rolle 21:38, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Elisa Rolle. Ruthven (msg) 23:59, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Deleted: to be undeleted in 2029. Not free in home country. --Ruthven (msg) 12:12, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Rita Martin
[edit]Follow-up on the above DR by Mutter Erde, remaining images in the category. These are all UK works by English photographer Rita Martin who died in 1958. 70 years p.m.a. applies, can be undeleted in 2029. Also, it's possible to upload these images locally to English-language Wikipedia per their local policy.
- File:Dorothé Mabel Lewis, 1922 (34013001683).jpg
- File:EleanorSouray1907.tif
- File:Julia James.jpg
- File:Mw174608.jpg
- File:Violet Tweedale.jpg
- File:Yeshwantrao Holkar II.jpg
Gestumblindi (talk) 21:42, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- I guess one question would be whether these images were also published in the United States before 1923--if they were, they're out of copyright for our purposes, no matter when the photographer died, is that correct? - Penny Richards (talk) 21:59, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- Ah, no, this is the line in the template: "Public domain works must be out of copyright in both the United States and in the source country of the work in order to be hosted on the Commons. If the work is not a U.S. work, the file must have an additional copyright tag indicating the copyright status in the source country." So yeah, I guess they have to be deleted until they're free in the UK too. Penny Richards (talk) 22:08, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom and the result of the previous DR for this photographer. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:20, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Rita Martin
[edit]These are photographs by English photographer Rita Martin, published in English magazine The Tatler, which was published in London (only). So British copyright applies as far as Wikimedia Commons is concerned. While the photos are in the public domain in the US, they are still protected in the UK because Martin died in 1958. So the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2029.
- File:Adrah Fair by Rita Martin (The Tatler, Dec 1916).png
- File:Gertie Millar, by Rita Martin (The Tatler, Dec 1916).png
- File:Helen Morris by Rita Martin (The Tatler, Dec 1916).png
- File:Julia James by Rita Martin (The Tatler, 1916).png
- File:Mabel Russell by Rita Martin (The Tatler, 1916).png
- File:Marjorie Gordon by Rita Martin (The Tatler, Dec 1916).png
- File:Mrs. Benedict Birkbeck. Photograph by Rita Martin. (Tatler, Dec 1914).png
- File:Peggy Kurton by Rita Martin (The Tatler, 1916) 01.png
- File:Peggy Kurton by Rita Martin (The Tatler, 1916) 02.png
- File:Peggy Kurton by Rita Martin (The Tatler, 1916) 03.png
- File:Sheila Stuart by Rita Martin (The Tatler, Dec 1916).png
Rosenzweig τ 12:03, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:52, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
bassa qualità scarso interesse AngeloMiele (talk) 17:44, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:16, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused image of random gravel, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep ins scope, with coordinates, usable. --Ralf Roleček 20:00, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Ralf Roleček (even if I'm skeptic). Ruthven (msg) 00:04, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
No license (and no indication why this should be in the Public Domain). Artist died in 1956. FA2010 (talk) 21:45, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Because this work was created before 1923 and has been held in a public institution, the Brooklyn Museum considers it published and thus in the public domain in the U.S. --Deb Wythe, Brooklyn Museum Digital Lab (talk) 13:49, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
- But was it first published in the U.S., and before 1923? If it was first published in the U.S., but after 1922, it might not be in the public domain. Its status will depend on details of copyright notices and renewals. If it was first published in another country, we need to take that country's law into account too. --Avenue (talk) 23:47, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Kept: 1915 work, Brooklyn Museum believes it is PD -- that's good enough here. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:59, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Not PD in home country. — Racconish ☎ 20:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per avobe discussion: produced/published before 1923 and has been held in a public institution. Ruthven (msg) 00:06, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
This was published in 1916, so it is in the PD in the US. But even the Brooklyn Museum says "Place Made: Germany", and because the artist Emil Nolde died in 1956, this is not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2027. Rosenzweig τ 20:54, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig But was it first *published* in Germany? We use the Berne Convention's definition of "country of origin" for our definition of "source country" (Commons:Licensing#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law). If the painting was first published in the U.S., the U.S. is the source country, and the file can be kept. If there was publication in both Germany and the U.S. within 30 days of each other, the U.S. is also considered the source country (by virtue of having the shorter term of copyright), and the file can be kept. Only if the painting was first published in Germany (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days) is Germany considered the source country, and in that case the file should be deleted. I would not favor deletion unless there is some evidence of German publication before U.S. publication. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Mdaniels5757: This is not a painting, but a lithograph, so a print, and as I understand it printed by Nolde himself in Germany in 1916 (he signed it and labelled it in pencil as Probedruck, trial run). From what I gathered he printed these by hand, limited number of copies, and sold them as numbered copies or gave them to supporters (per de.wp he apparently started doing that while he was a member of artist group Die Brücke). Compare [4]: A 1913 lithograph by Nolde, one of 40 numbered copies. I guess that should count as first publication, by the artist himself, in Germany. Given that, I think a first publication in the US or publication there within 30 days is unlikely. --Rosenzweig τ 19:47, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- OK, then Delete —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:05, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- OK, then
- @Mdaniels5757: This is not a painting, but a lithograph, so a print, and as I understand it printed by Nolde himself in Germany in 1916 (he signed it and labelled it in pencil as Probedruck, trial run). From what I gathered he printed these by hand, limited number of copies, and sold them as numbered copies or gave them to supporters (per de.wp he apparently started doing that while he was a member of artist group Die Brücke). Compare [4]: A 1913 lithograph by Nolde, one of 40 numbered copies. I guess that should count as first publication, by the artist himself, in Germany. Given that, I think a first publication in the US or publication there within 30 days is unlikely. --Rosenzweig τ 19:47, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; I have uploaded it to en-WP for the time being. —holly {chat} 18:53, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. Only edits by this user are own talk page, no meaningful edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 00:06, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Use of a copyrighted photograph without permission. Presumable taken from here [5]. Claimed date of 1/1/2000 is dubious. SamHolt6 (talk) 21:38, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 00:09, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sikander as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Cropped image from http://pcparty.ns.ca/mla-macleod-pleased-mira-river-provincial-park-season-will-extended/
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. It's correct that the cited external website shows an uncropped version of this image. However, upload to that website was clearly later (http://pcparty.ns.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/alfiemacleod2.jpg) than upload to Commons. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:32, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Unused logo of unknown organization. No useful categories or useful description, so this will be lost among our 40+ million images. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:15, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
The design of the book cover is copyrighted, and not created by the uploader. The file must be deleted or marked as fair use. --בקרה וייעוץ (talk) 10:57, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
(translation): The design of the book cover is copyrighted, and not created by the uploader. The file must be deleted or marked as fair use. -- Geagea (talk) 11:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Fair use is not kosher in Commons. --E4024 (talk) 12:03, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Fizped as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7, No premission from Artist of award
Converted by me to DR, as it does not qualify for SD. I see no originality in the depicted work. If something is not copyrightable, no permission is needed. However, nominator objected against removal of his 1st speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete This is backside of Medal of Roland Eötvös Physical Society. (Work of Búza, Barna. Owned by Nagy, Dénes Lajos, the Awarded of the year 2016.) This is artwork (see: ELFT_erem_01.jpg) → the backside of Medal is also protected. No premission from Artist → the photo must be deleted. Fizped (talk) 21:04, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
What is copyrights status of works of Georgia? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Apparently a web grab; can be found on the web such as this one. This image has existed on Commons for a long time, so nominating for deletion instead. theinstantmatrix (talk) 18:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Derivative of other works. Mhhossein talk 19:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
I got an email by Rachel Kushner who does hate the picute. So I agreed to delete it. Haemmerli (talk) 12:51, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as this is author's request. Ankry (talk) 09:55, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep on principle, since it is in scope and there is no legal requirement for us to delete it. If it was a private event, I'd say delete, but since this was a public event, I don't like us deleting one of the only images we have of this person (we have one other photo where she is partly visible in a panel), unless we have to. This is not a case of personality rights, but a case of courtesy, and that should be used in extreme cases and with sparsly applies. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Request from subject at OTRS ticket:2018020210009414. This photograph was taken in Switzerland - one of the few countries where consent is need to take a photograph. The subject claims "I never consented to being photographed. You can see from the looking at the photo that I am not even aware it's being taken." Ronhjones (Talk) 21:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- See Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Switzerland Ronhjones (Talk) 21:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- "It is generally recognized by case law and legal doctrine that consent is implied for pictures of public figures, at least when performing their public functions or activities". This was a function where, from the description, she had just been "reading from her novel". --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:03, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as courtesy and goodwill. Yes, technically we have the "right" to keep it as User:Josve05a says, but why insist on this if the person feels so strongly about it? All meaningful uses of this picture have been replaced. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:05, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Info The other image is likely a copyvio. Ankry (talk) 14:18, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- I uploaded File:Rachel Kushner 2015 (cropped).jpg as an alternative. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as courtesy since the new image is much better (this is my actual !vote as the piece above was just the request data by the subject). Ronhjones (Talk) 21:15, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Small resolution, no EXIF, found elsewhere on web Hystrix (talk) 23:38, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Single item gallery (or wrong categorization). E4024 (talk) 08:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:31, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:32, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Does not seem to be "own work" from description or file size. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:33, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Appears to be a very small file containing recent artwork, not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:33, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Appears to be a very small file containing recent artwork, not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- It should be noted that copyrighted 2D paintings are not protected under FOP in India —SpanishSnake (talk) 22:26, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:34, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
From size and lack of quality, does not appear to be own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:35, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
It's not known whether the file is really published under PD. The uploader has plenty of deleted files with similar problems. Mhhossein talk 19:51, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete.These are DW (Getty images) from the same uploader. I tried to crop them.
- I think the current version of these files is Ok:
- File:Nima Reiisi.JPG
- File:Ardeshir kazemi87.jpg
- File:Alireza Bazrafshan.JPG
- + (DW in the background)
- File:Mehrangizevazizri.JPG
- But I'm not sure about these photos:
- File:Naser Mamdoh.JPG
- File:Mohamadali Najafi.JPG
- + (DW in the background)
- File:Rambod Javan.jpg
- File:Soudabeh moradian.JPG
- File:Ansariyan.JPG
- File:Siruse ebrahimzade.jpg
- File:Behnoushe bakhtyari.jpg
- File:N-Biroti280886.JPG
SlowManifesto (talk) 22:31, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:35, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to qualify for freedom of panorama as the item depicted is a sculpture on a building, not the building itself. Additionally, even if freedom of panorama applied, all of the uploaded versions appear to be done by professional photographers or concept artists as works of art in themselves and not simple reproductions, so we would need proof of license. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:55, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:38, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
The Guardian (JCS)
[edit]- The Guardian (JCS)
- File:The Guardian Antiterrorism Journal Summer 2011.pdf
- File:The Guardian Antiterrorism Journal Spring 2011.pdf
- File:The Guardian Antiterrorism Journal Fall 2010 PUBLIC version.pdf
- File:The Guardian Antiterrorism Journal Summer 2010.pdf
- File:The Guardian Antiterrorism Journal Fall 2009.pdf
- File:The Guardian Antiterrorism Journal Summer 2009.pdf
- File:The Guardian Antiterrorism Journal Spring 2009.pdf
- File:The Guardian Antiterrorism Journal Winter 2008.pdf
- File:The Guardian Antiterrorism Journal Spring 2008.pdf
- File:The Guardian Antiterrorism Journal Winter 2007.pdf
- File:The Guardian Antiterrorism Journal Fall 2007.pdf
- File:The Guardian Antiterrorism Journal Spring 2007.pdf
Uploaded by Geo Swan 6+ years ago, all of this content fails COM:SCOPE. The first page is a list article and the others are multi-page pdf documents. --Chris Troutman (talk) 00:46, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Perhaps Chris Troutman could explain their interpretation of SCOPE more fully?
- I cropped and uploaded the image on the first page of the first issue listed here. File:Aerial view of the Pentagon shortly after the attack on 2001-9-11.png
- I think images related to terrorism are generally in scope, and every one of these files is full of images related to terrorism. Geo Swan (talk) 18:43, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- I have nominated the cropped cover image for deletion since the PDF did not provide a source. This may be an image from a DOD employee or it may be an image from elsewhere. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 19:03, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I didn't look through all of the PDFs, but at least one of these contains copyrighted images. Just because something is published by the US government, it doesn't make it public domain. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 18:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- Oh? Really? Can you specify the file, page and image(s) you think are problems? Geo Swan (talk) 19:12, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, really. Look through File:The Guardian Antiterrorism Journal Summer 2011.pdf. If these aren't deleted as being out of scope, someone will need to check them all. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 19:16, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- Page 11, for example, has a picture of President Bush's home in Dallas. It doesn't appear to be marked public domain or creative commons and was not taken by a gov't employee. Regardless, if Geo Swan wants to upload individual images, that's fine. Uploading whole pdfs from the Federal Government is the violation of SCOPE. Geo Swan needs not be defensive about this nomination; nonsense claims that PD content somewhere might be useful to someone someday does not excuse violating policy. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:36, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, really. Look through File:The Guardian Antiterrorism Journal Summer 2011.pdf. If these aren't deleted as being out of scope, someone will need to check them all. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 19:16, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- Oh? Really? Can you specify the file, page and image(s) you think are problems? Geo Swan (talk) 19:12, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - out of scope and lots of issues with copyright. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:11, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
Guttiner foi anunciado pelo FC Chornomorets Odesa Guttiner (talk) 12:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Sealle (talk) 10:52, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Robert Bonfils died in 1972. Copyright violation. 82.216.33.207 10:51, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 00:03, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Sculptor Henry Murail died only in 2012, whereby his works are copyrighted until end of 2082. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception in France, whereby this image violates the copyright of the sculptor. So, either a permission from his heirs or deletion of the image is required. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:26, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
The same problem with all files in Category:Henry Murail, as all are installed in France:
- File:Nantes de nuit - Benjamin (7846738516).jpg
- File:Nantes - General Leclerc.JPG
- File:Henry Murail Adagio.jpg
- File:La Baigneuse.jpg
- File:La Source (femme assise).jpg
- File:Marianne d'Henry Murail.jpg
- File:Henry Murail et sa Marianne.jpg - image could be cropped to preserve the portrait of the sculptor (done: File:Henry Murail 2006.jpg)
--Túrelio (talk) 10:32, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- I have to admit I never understand the problem here, but I assume they will all be deleted anyway, as usual. We're not making any profit from them, right? Could the problem be solved by simply changing the license used for each file? Adam Bishop (talk) 13:31, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- That's an astonishing statement for someone who has been active on Commons since 2005. Let me put the pieces together:
- 1) I hope, it's undisputed that sculptor Henry Murail resp. his heirs hold the copyright for these works til end of 2082 (70 years pma).
- 2) France has no usable freedom-of-panorama exception, only an FoP-lite excluding commercial use.
- 3) Our licensing policy requires that not only republication, distribution and derivatives but also commercial use must be allowed.
- So, deletion of these images might be avoided if an interested user contacts the heir(s) of Henry Murail and obtains a permission. --Túrelio (talk) 21:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- It's not really very astonishing, considering that someone usually makes the same comment whenever French FOP files are being deleted (in the event that anyone ever bothers to comment at all). But isn't the policy itself kind of stupid? Why can't the license be amended? "Commercial use is prohibited for images that would otherwise violate France's FOP law", voilà. (Sorry if I am being flippant...I know this is not your fault.) Adam Bishop (talk) 02:12, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
- Ok. So, it's about the principal question, why COM:L requires commercial usability. Well, this was decided very early in Commons' history (when I wasn't around) and seems to be unalterable, as per earlier discussions. Sure, for us it would be easier without this hurdle. We could host far better images. However, for re-users there would be a higher risk, as to what is considered commercial use varies from country to country and from court to court. --Túrelio (talk) 10:38, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
- It's not really very astonishing, considering that someone usually makes the same comment whenever French FOP files are being deleted (in the event that anyone ever bothers to comment at all). But isn't the policy itself kind of stupid? Why can't the license be amended? "Commercial use is prohibited for images that would otherwise violate France's FOP law", voilà. (Sorry if I am being flippant...I know this is not your fault.) Adam Bishop (talk) 02:12, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 00:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
This was an unauthorized and erroneous emblem. The correct emblem is found here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/192nd_Fighter_Wing#/media/File:192d_Fighter_Wing_shield.jpg 98.190.48.236 19:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
It looks like the main difference is the shade of blue. Is this correct? --Pmsyyz (talk) 19:38, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
The difference is the color and the horse's abdomen is missing, filled in with blue. Bella-Brock (talk) 16:05, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Perhaps instead of deleting, I've uploaded a new png, with transparency. That's useful too. Bella-Brock (talk) 16:39, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: The Commons is generally agnostic regarding “correctness” as long as the file is educationally useful (i.e., such requests are tantamount to a COM:SCOPE rationale.) As this file is in use, it is in scope and there is no valid reason at present to delete. --Эlcobbola talk 14:56, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
We've got two of this. E4024 (talk) 14:54, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, , duplicated file, deleted and redirected. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:14, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Black back ground comes behind letters Arjuncm3 (talk) 16:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Courtesy deletions. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:10, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Black back ground comes behind letters Arjuncm3 (talk) 16:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Courtesy deletions. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:11, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Black back ground comes behind letters Arjuncm3 (talk) 16:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Courtesy deletions. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:12, 29 March 2018 (UTC)