Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/06/24
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
TV Globo Minas Danillo9689 (talk) 01:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:Average sized post-pubertal testicle.JPG
Advertising, see description, advertises conferences. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:17, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Delete: The file was speedily deleted by Hedwig in Washington (talk · contribs). --Stefan4 (talk) 12:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Advertising, see description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:17, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Delete: The file was speedily deleted by Hedwig in Washington (talk · contribs). --Stefan4 (talk) 12:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Advertising, see description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:18, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Delete: The file was speedily deleted by Hedwig in Washington (talk · contribs). --Stefan4 (talk) 12:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Globo Minas 20141.png Danillo9689 (talk) 01:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Delete: The file was speedily deleted by Dharmadhyaksha (talk · contribs). --Stefan4 (talk) 12:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bodhisattwa as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.google.co.in/search?q=chandraketugarh&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSiAEahQELEKjU2AQaAAwLELCMpwgaYApeCAMSKNQV1RXmFOoU6xSjFdMV-wrhFf8D9ir1KvQq8Df5KtEp0Cn3OYI51SkaMJwM8v6WwOapkT0Q_1yYCJyPHjDHniNP7k-EoO4Yt1F-0SMDO9ghFVRVDScKK2X_149wwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBJPT3dcM&sa=X&ei=3YeKVbhwycm4BL6EgcAF&ved=0CBgQ2A4oAQ&biw=1366&bih=638 Revent (talk) 10:49, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Almost certainly a copyvio from this 2008 The Hindu article, but it's been on Commons for five years now, is in use, and the source doesn't give an attribution, so worth seeing if anyone can find an older source that's compatibly licensed. The other uses I found are all much more recent, and quite likely copied from here. Revent (talk) 10:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Disregard, nuked them all after checking other contribs. Multiple sources, multiple watermarks, all claimed as own work. Revent (talk) 11:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
COM:FOP#France. 84.61.167.120 08:00, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep The hotel is de minimis in the overall photo, it is more panoramic. russavia (talk) 12:39, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
no you can be kill me 197.77.163.245 12:07, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion given. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Architecutral work , No FoP in france ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: speedy kept, nothing protectable visible Denniss (talk) 12:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
yetyy6y7d6ty6syt76v7gg6v7t857tutug8tuuumjjujjjjkjjfi6yfhh6yhcby5teujje6yhnuyhe7jmydiuur786r7 75.117.230.163 17:38, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:11, 24 June 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Copy of copyrighted image https://www.flickr.com/photos/9549155@N03/2035665285/in/photostream/ Worldbruce (talk) 20:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 20:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
This is a blurry low-res and lopsided copy of the same image as File:Etty – The Combat (1848 engraving).jpeg, and is not used anywhere on any project. — iridescent 08:52, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Done. Please use the duplicate tag! Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:52, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Seemst that the viewer cant handle with letters created by Inkscape Tkkrd (talk) 13:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: Nominator is uploader, attempting to upload a simple logo and having trouble with Inkscape. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
COM:FOP#France. 84.61.167.120 09:36, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I really don't know if flowers can be copyrighted^^ but the buildings are in background and then are De Minimis. Jeriby (talk) 16:02, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Thanks ! Of course, this image enters in the Commons:De minimis exception. --Tangopaso (talk) 21:15, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: I'm pretty sure that Slovenia is the only country where landscape and garden desgin can have a copyright. THe buildings are DM. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:17, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Planned landscaping , post 1945, No FoP in france... ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Same opinion as in the previous DR: buildings in background are De Minimis. For the flowers, even if it's "planned", I'm not sure trees and flowers can be copyrighted, especially in this shape (no particular drawing made with the flowers, just little squares around trees...). Jeriby (talk) 14:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Once again Keep This image enters in the Commons:De minimis exception. The flowers of flowerbed are regular following lines without originality. --Tangopaso (talk) 21:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above, and the previous closure. Yann (talk) 21:58, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BrandonFearless (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Naomi turn heel.jpg
- File:Paige en el ring.jpg
- File:BrieandNikki02Bella.jpg
- File:Nikkiandbrie04mayo.jpg
- File:Thebellatwinsenwrestlemania31.jpg
- File:Jerundiogerugarcia.png
- File:Zaynensudebutenraw.PNG
- File:SamiZaynenAccion.PNG
- File:NikkiBellaBrieBellaDivasChampioship.PNG
- File:Samizaynnxt2015.png
- File:Raidflairenunarutinadeautografos.png
- File:Nikkiybrieel1dejunio.PNG
- File:Brandonfearless2015.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Coprighted logo from European Games 2015, without permission from it owners. 99kerob (talk) 11:20, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 11:04, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NasaEolBot (talk · contribs)
[edit]Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Iss040e016742.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016743.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016744.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016846.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016847.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016848.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016855.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016856.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016857.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016861.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016862.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016863.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016870.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016871.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016872.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016966.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016967.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018306.jpeg
Ies (talk) 14:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Iss040e014795.jpeg
- File:Iss040e014800.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018323.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018776.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018780.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018781.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018782.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018789.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018790.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018791.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018795.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018796.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018797.jpeg
- File:Iss040e019113.jpeg
- File:Iss040e031885.jpeg
- File:Iss040e033213.jpeg
- File:Iss040e033214.jpeg
- File:Iss040e033220.jpeg
- File:Iss040e033227.jpeg
- File:Iss040e033228.jpeg
- File:Iss040e033229.jpeg
- File:Iss040e042603.jpeg
- File:Iss040e042604.jpeg
- File:Iss040e042605.jpeg
- File:Iss040e042606.jpeg
- File:Iss040e045526.jpeg
- File:Iss040e045527.jpeg
- File:Iss040e055262.jpeg
- File:Iss040e055263.jpeg
- File:Iss040e081150.jpeg
- File:Iss040e042601.jpeg
- File:Iss040e042602.jpeg
- File:Iss040e055264.jpeg
- File:Iss040e055265.jpeg
- File:Iss040e055266.jpeg
- File:Iss040e080859.jpeg
- File:Iss040e080860.jpeg
- File:Iss040e081151.jpeg
- File:Iss040e081152.jpeg
- File:Iss040e091209.jpeg
- File:Iss040e091215.jpeg
- File:Iss040e105573.jpeg
- File:Iss040e105574.jpeg
- File:Iss040e105575.jpeg
- File:Iss040e091206.jpeg
- File:Iss040e091212.jpeg
Ies (talk) 14:20, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 14:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hi There :D, At least the last photo have some qualities (8Mb You can zoom in and they are all raw images which can be modified), also the User is a robot with valid flag. please take look at this. --Pouyana (talk) 14:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Julo (talk) 22:04, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NasaEolBot (talk · contribs)
[edit]Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Iss040e016742.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016743.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016744.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016846.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016847.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016848.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016855.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016856.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016857.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016861.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016862.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016863.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016870.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016871.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016872.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016966.jpeg
- File:Iss040e016967.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018306.jpeg
Ies (talk) 14:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Iss040e014795.jpeg
- File:Iss040e014800.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018323.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018776.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018780.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018781.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018782.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018789.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018790.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018791.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018795.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018796.jpeg
- File:Iss040e018797.jpeg
- File:Iss040e019113.jpeg
- File:Iss040e031885.jpeg
- File:Iss040e033213.jpeg
- File:Iss040e033214.jpeg
- File:Iss040e033220.jpeg
- File:Iss040e033227.jpeg
- File:Iss040e033228.jpeg
- File:Iss040e033229.jpeg
- File:Iss040e042603.jpeg
- File:Iss040e042604.jpeg
- File:Iss040e042605.jpeg
- File:Iss040e042606.jpeg
- File:Iss040e045526.jpeg
- File:Iss040e045527.jpeg
- File:Iss040e055262.jpeg
- File:Iss040e055263.jpeg
- File:Iss040e081150.jpeg
- File:Iss040e042601.jpeg
- File:Iss040e042602.jpeg
- File:Iss040e055264.jpeg
- File:Iss040e055265.jpeg
- File:Iss040e055266.jpeg
- File:Iss040e080859.jpeg
- File:Iss040e080860.jpeg
- File:Iss040e081151.jpeg
- File:Iss040e081152.jpeg
- File:Iss040e091209.jpeg
- File:Iss040e091215.jpeg
- File:Iss040e105573.jpeg
- File:Iss040e105574.jpeg
- File:Iss040e105575.jpeg
- File:Iss040e091206.jpeg
- File:Iss040e091212.jpeg
Ies (talk) 14:20, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 14:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hi There :D, At least the last photo have some qualities (8Mb You can zoom in and they are all raw images which can be modified), also the User is a robot with valid flag. please take look at this. --Pouyana (talk) 14:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Julo (talk) 22:04, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
See {{Watermark}}: no evidence of permission. Stefan4 (talk) 10:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, © on bottom right corner. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
I dont like this photo :) Portlannd (talk) 11:48, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Non-attributed montage with no clarity on individual images' copyrights. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:13, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, considering part File:LUČA CRNA GORA.JPG, uploaded by Portlannd (talk · contributions · Statistics) = serial copyright violator + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Portlannd. Gunnex (talk) 09:05, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:47, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Very small low resolution black and white image claimed as own work, and likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this image (which appears to be a selfie) of a young performer, from the size of it, likely copied from social media. Probable COM:COPYVIO, no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:05, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Halftoned black and white image of a man, unlikely to be user's own work and likely COM:COPYVIO. Small size, no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:05, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Obviously the book is being held by a hand, the photograph may be own work of uploader, but the book isn't. Without more information of the source of this blurry image, it's likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:07, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Seeing the hand holding this book suggests the photo may be the own work of uploader, but the book isn't. Possible COM:COPYVIO without additional information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:07, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
a copy of a government act is not "own work", image needs source, and may also be out of COM:SCOPE as it is only a text file and the information can be included in the article in plain text. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:10, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on these sophisticated diagrams which also can be found on the internet Copyright © 2015 Breaking News Trinidad and Tobago http://news.co.tt/public_html/article.php?story=20131223120017186 and can also be found on the company's website with no indication of license.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, commons isn't a personal photographic album.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:18, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Damaris vargas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, Commons is not a personal photographic album.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused, unneeded fan art, possibly derivative image of characters as stated in description. Out of COM:SCOPE, this would be more appropriate for myspace or deviantart. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO: Seal is not own work, no indication of free license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Commons is not a place to host doodle art, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work for this seal or logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:24, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Self-promotional description appended to image of male in chair. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. hip and brain seem to be added. Com:DW at best. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FitteHRO89 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Two (c)vios deleted. What puzzles me is the exif data. One photo taken with a Coolpix, one with a Nikon (deleted), and three without info. More likely taken from a website or promotion material. IMHO no permission at best.
- File:Wartebereich in der OSPA-Filiale Dierkow.jpg
- File:Wartebereich in der OSPA-Filiale EKZ Bad Doberan (2).JPG
- File:Wartebereich in der OSPA-Filiale EKZ Bad Doberan.JPG
- File:Beratungsraum in der OSPA-Filiale EKZ Bad Doberan.JPG
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Low quality, replaced by other images at Category:Mitsubishi Magna (TS). OSX (talk • contributions) 01:38, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Low quality, replaced by other images at Category:Mitsubishi Magna (TS). OSX (talk • contributions) 01:38, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Press moooi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Several designs depicted, probably copyright violation at the expense of the designer. Out of scope - advert.
- File:Moooi new-york showroom-3-forweb-moooi.jpg
- File:Moooi Andaz Set 30 933 by Peer Lindgreen and Moooi Nov2012-forweb-moooi.jpg
- File:Raimond 199 mg2-forweb-moooi.jpg
- File:Moooi-Showroom-and-Brandstore-Amsterdam-2014-photography-by-Nicole-Marnati 6056-forweb-moooi.jpg
- File:Clouds final 01-forweb-moooi.jpg
- File:A4548471-forweb-moooi.jpg
- File:Moooi Milan 2015-461-forweb-moooi.jpg
- File:Moooi Milan 2015-269-forweb-moooi.jpg
- File:A4548505-forweb-moooi.jpg
- File:A4549408-forweb-moooi.jpg
- File:Moooi Andaz Set 10 708-forweb-moooi.jpg
- File:Moooi Milan PeerLindgreen 0290-forweb-moooi.jpg
- File:Random-Edit-forweb-moooi.jpg
- File:Smokechair s-forweb-moooi.jpg
- File:MG 0511 final-forweb-moooi.jpg
- File:Setupshade3x-forweb-moooi.jpg
- File:Heracleum copper on-forweb-moooi.jpg
- File:Eggvase group bloom-forweb-moooi.jpg
- File:Horselamp-forweb-moooi.jpg
- File:Moooi logo.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Low quality image, replaced by images within Category:Ford Telstar (AT). OSX (talk • contributions) 03:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Low quality image, replaced by images within Category:Ford Telstar (AT). OSX (talk • contributions) 03:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Seems to be a scan of a non-free book cover [1] --ghouston (talk) 03:48, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohan Sutradhar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.
- File:Mohan Sutradhar .From Assam Golaghat Sarupathar (32).jpg
- File:Mohan Sutradhar.jpg
- File:Mohan Sutradhar .From Assam Golaghat Sarupathar (23).jpg
- File:Mohan Sutradhar .From Assam Golaghat Sarupathar (24).jpg
- File:Mohan Sutradhar .From Assam Golaghat Sarupathar (12).jpg
- File:Mohan Sutradhar .From Assam Golaghat Sarupathar (15).jpg
- File:Mohan Sutradhar .From Assam Golaghat Sarupathar (26).jpg
- File:Mohan Sutradhar .From Assam Golaghat Sarupathar (13).jpg
- File:Mohan Sutradhar .From Assam Golaghat Sarupathar (10).jpg
- File:Mohan Sutradhar .From Assam Golaghat Sarupathar.jpg
- File:Mohan Sutradhar .From Assam Golaghat Sarupathar (25).jpg
- File:Mohan Sutradhar .From Assam Golaghat Sarupathar (35).jpg
- File:Mohan Sutradhar .From Assam Golaghat Sarupathar (20).jpg
- File:Mohan Sutradhar .From Assam Golaghat Sarupathar (14).jpg
- File:Mohan Sutradhar .From Assam Golaghat Sarupathar (7).jpg
- File:Mohan Sutradhar .From Assam Golaghat Sarupathar (21).jpg
- File:Mohan Sutradhar .From Assam Golaghat Sarupathar (36).jpg
- File:Mohan Sutradhar .From Assam Golaghat Sarupathar (37).jpg
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RandySeeMrChinatown2013 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.
- File:Randy See My Love - Steve Angeles d.jpg
- File:Randy See My Love - Steve Angeles c.jpg
- File:Randy See My Love - Steve Angeles b.jpg
- File:Randy See My Love - Steve Angeles a.jpg
- File:Randy See Mr. Chinatown 2013 Lover 1.jpg
- File:Randy See Mr. Chinatown 2013 Lover 2.jpg
- File:Randy See Mr. Chinatown 2013 Lover 3.jpg
- File:Randy See Mr. Chinatown 2013 Lover 4.jpg
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
suspected copyright violation from listed source EricEnfermero (talk) 05:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 05:30, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 05:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Likely false authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, previous publications, and the uploader's history.
- File:2013.09.16 감자별 2013QR3 제작발표회 하연수.jpg – http://img.newspim.com/content/image/2013/09/16/20130916000575_0.jpg
- File:2012.04.20 영화 코리아 시사회 김지원.jpg
- File:15.5.4 드라마 착하지 않은 여자들 종방연 하승리.jpg – http://img.gnj.kr/newsen/news_photo/2015/05/14/201505141959572010_1.jpg with the watermark deliberately cropped out to conceal the copyright infringement
- File:15.4.1 CGV영등포에서 장수상회 VIP 시사회 김윤혜.jpg – http://www.usernews.co.kr/news/photo/201504/11076_19572_5912.jpg
- File:14.6.11 고교처세왕 제작발표회 이열음.jpg – http://cphoto.asiae.co.kr/listimglink/6/201406111427140281913A_1.jpg with the watermark deliberately cropped out to conceal the copyright infringement
- File:14.7.9 영화 산타바바라 시사회 이솜.jpg – http://imgnews.naver.net/image/213/2014/07/09/20140709_1404902859_79528900_1_99_20140709195114.jpg with the watermark deliberately cropped out to conceal the copyright infringement
- File:14.2.19 드라마 백년의 신부 제작발표회 장아영.jpg – http://spnimage.edaily.co.kr/images/photo/files/NP/S/2014/02/PS14021900312.jpg with the watermark deliberately cropped out to conceal the copyright infringement
- File:13.10.2 영화 화이 시사회 서예지.jpg – http://able.kbs.co.kr/enter/tal_view.php?mseq=16&pcg=&pgseq=&no=274559&SearchKey=&list_current_page=10
- File:13.8.8 인천국제공항 이다희.jpg – http://news.zum.com/articles/8265379?c=06 with the watermark deliberately cropped out to conceal the copyright infringement
- File:13.5.4 드라마 여왕의 교실 제작발표회 최윤영.jpg – http://starin.edaily.co.kr/news/NewsRead.edy?SCD=EA31&newsid=01453046602838440&DCD=A10102 with the watermark deliberately cropped out to conceal the copyright infringement
- File:12.11.9 Jambangee 팬사인회 윤진이.jpg – http://ikbc.net/wysiwyg/PEG/W_1352704892.jpg
- File:2013.01.26 롯데아울렛 서울역점 SOUP 신세경 팬사인회.jpg – http://cfile29.uf.tistory.com/original/0124AA34510544D024B367 with the watermark deliberately cropped out to conceal the copyright infringement
- File:14.02.23 Marionette 발매기념 팬사인회.jpg – http://blog.mcmoon.net/files/attach/images/93/969/038/ab190592b7968e65a1196ee88e85e5b4.jpg with the watermark deliberately cropped out to conceal the copyright infringement
—LX (talk, contribs) 06:18, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- And since 1rmqrudwp continued to upload copyright violations instead of commenting on this discussion, we can add the following to the list above:
- —LX (talk, contribs) 14:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I'm sorry about them. I don't understand about the law of Wikimedia. Also, I don't recognize about your opinions. Thus, I delete to every pictures of illegitimate. However, File:15.4.14 Lee Yoo Young.jpg is only my self picture. Why do you argue it is illegal picture. Thus, I send e-mail to Wikimedia with my argument. --1rmqrudwp (토론) 2015년 6월 25일 (목) 16:44 (KST)
- The fact that it's illegal to take credit for other people's works, distribute them without the copyright holder's consent and issue false licenses isn't a matter of "the law of Wikimedia"; it's just the law. Ignorance of Commons' rules isn't much of an excuse either, since you cannot upload anything without confirming that you've read the first page of the Upload Wizard, which is available in nearly every conceivable language and which tells you in very simple terms that "by default, you can't upload someone else's work. This includes most material such as most pictures published on the Internet."
- File:15.4.14 Lee Yoo Young.jpg has a very low resolution (only 723×761 pixels, which is typical of files grabbed from the Internet or captured from videos, rather than what your own digital camera would produce) and no metadata (which, again, is typical of files grabbed from the Internet or captured from videos, but not for files from your own digital camera), and you've demonstrably lied about other uploads being your own work. On that basis, I'm not convinced at this time that you've created the photo yourself. If you did, I would expect you to be able to provide a full-resolution version with intact metadata. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:50, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for answering my opinions. I can understand that what is my faults. As mentioned earlier, I don't know it acts in violation of the law. Thus, I tried finding original picture. However, I can't find it because I used camera of old mobile when I took a pictures.
- Accordingly, I moved every pictures when I needed using. I reminded that why is size of the picture small because original it can two person. I could look Actress Lim ji youn and actress Lee Yoo Young.
- On that account, I did cut the actress Lim Ji youn the picture. Maybe, you can't believe about my reply because it is lack meagerness reasons and my past record. My final remark is it doesn't accept in good intentions by spite. If someone send to me evidence about trespass against the law, I will delete it by myself.
- At the same time, you want to take exception it. I will accept your punishment because the uploading is an arbitrary doing.
- Finally, I will receive that my every doing is illegal works. Then, I will never upload any pictures at the Wikimedia.
- Thank you for reading a written answer. --1rmqrudwp (토론) 13:25, 26 June 2015 (Fri) (KST)
- It won't be my decision whether or not to delete it, but please note that deletion is never done to punish the uploader. Deletion of copyright violations and precautionary deletion of possible copyright violations is done to protect uploaders, reusers of this site, and the integrity and reliability of the site as a source of truly free content. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:06, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Artes~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]The files are all over the web. Unlikely to be own work. See also exif.
- File:Kirill Petrenko.jpg
- File:Catedral valladolid.jpg
- File:Exaltacion eucaristia valladolid.jpg
- File:Sagrada cena valladolid corpus.jpg
- File:Corpus valladolid custodia juan de arfe.JPG
- File:Corpus valladolid plaza mayor.jpeg
Steinsplitter (talk) 06:54, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LuisinhoCDC (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, considering also:
- File:PLANTILLLA (1).jpg + File:PLANTILLA CALAHORRA.jpg (uploaded 01.2015) --> previously published (both photos) via http://luisjacalahorra.blogspot.de/2014/11/el-calahorra-realizo-su-foto-oficial.html (2014)
Gunnex (talk) 07:38, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Depicted sculpture obviously recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works in the U.S. So, permission or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Depicted work obviously recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works in the U.S. So, permission or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:41, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Depicted statue likely recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works in the U.S. So, permission or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, unused image of likely non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Info Reuploaded as File:Cepeban.jpg (nominating hereby too). Gunnex (talk) 08:44, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 08:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 08:18, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 08:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 08:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 08:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 08:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 08:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 08:30, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Low resolution and not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 08:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 08:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
This is probably unauthorized copying from http://icrhs.tsukuba.ac.jp/ --Damena (talk) 08:31, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 08:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamadah-hor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.
- File:صاحب كتاب الاسلام مابين النظرة والواقع.jpg
- File:مكانة المرأة في الاسلام.png
- File:10418409 487378598070459 5506178569378705268n.jpg
- File:10458464 485419808266338 7060088328552617392n.jpg
- File:10177857 400167443458242 1352476479353841841n.jpg
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:41, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 08:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Poor quality and not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 08:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 08:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 08:48, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Mickey Mouse is still copyrighted I suppose and this is its derivative work. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
See en:The_Little_Mermaid_(statue)#Copyright_issues, FOP in Denmark is for buildings only. El Grafo (talk) 09:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Delete all post 1978 United States stamps are copyright per Commons:Stamps/Public domain#United States Ww2censor (talk) 09:43, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
https://plateforme.bnei.org/site/main/about Copyright © 2015, BNEI. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 09:47, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Personal artwork, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. See also en:Wikipedia_talk:Image_use_policy/Archive_15#Supervillain_Hubal for discussion concerning educational merit including input from the artist. Storkk (talk) 10:07, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
EXIF states that the copyright holder is a "BIAIS JEAN MARC HEC PARIS", however uploader is Evermore345 (talk · contribs). If the uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:20, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, letterboxed - likely copyright violation, perhaps a TV still. Storkk (talk) 10:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, appears professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
These appear to be commercial songs and films. The uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder.
- File:01-ZERO.ogg
- File:13 - Por Amor feat Serafina Sanchez.ogg
- File:12 - Dinheiro Kumbú.ogg
- File:11 - Amo Essa Mulher.ogg
- File:10 - Forever ft Prodígio.ogg
- File:09 - Matemática do Amor.ogg
- File:08 - Vai Embora.ogg
- File:07 - Papá.ogg
- File:06 - Alô!.ogg
- File:05 - Sol e Lua.ogg
- File:04 - Loucos.ogg
- File:03 - A Culpa é Dela feat Mc Latón.ogg
- File:02 - Agi Sem Pensar.ogg
- File:Kid MC - Permanência (Video Oficial 4K) libtheora.ogv
- File:01 - Beijo Rainha.ogg
- File:Fumo no Ar Remix - Ready Neutro ft Francis e CEF libtheora.ogv
Stefan4 (talk) 10:30, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all + further uploads by this user like File:Zona 5 - Encardir A Area Ft. Anselmo Ralph (DM).ogg (29.06.2015), grabbed from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUbL5tVXc00 (05.2015, © by "Zona5 Official"). Gunnex (talk) 08:55, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Movicel12 (talk · contribs)
See above. Another set of files has been uploaded.
- File:Dji Tafinha - Imperfeito.ogg
- File:15-PLAYA -FOX SA (Feat NGA).ogg
- File:14-ESSAS PAREDES (Feat Ana Joyce).ogg
- File:13-AINDA ASSIM.ogg
- File:12-XIBO.ogg
- File:11-TODA GENTE (Feat NGA & MASTA).ogg
- File:10- AVERDADE.ogg
- File:09- DOPE BOYZ (Feat DOPE BOYZ).ogg
- File:07-OUTRA VEZ.ogg
- File:06-SERA.ogg
- File:05-RADIO (Feat Paulo Flores).ogg
- File:04-BODIOS.ogg
- File:03-DEUS ME PERDOA (Feat NGA).ogg
- File:02-YOUNG KING.ogg
- File:08- LAGOSTAS (Feat Landrick).ogg
- File:Zona 5 - Encardir A Area Ft. Anselmo Ralph (DM).ogg
- File:Kalibrados – “Bué Dope”(DM).ogg
Stefan4 (talk) 14:02, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Songs. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Dji Tafinha - Cara de Pitbull(DM) 04.ogg
- File:Dji Tafinha - Cara de Pitbull(DM) 03.ogg
- File:Dji Tafinha - Cara de Pitbull(DM) 02.ogg
- File:Dji Tafinha - Cara de Pitbull(DM) 01.ogg
- File:Kid MC - O Apagar da Esperança (feat. Paulo Flores) Mad Tapes 2015.ogg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:11, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
copyvio? https://www.facebook.com/marialevin.musik/photos/pb.140176206083546.-2207520000.1435141836./214890511945448/?type=3&theater dort: ©Pop-Eye/Heinrich diba (talk) 10:31, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a TV screencap. Storkk (talk) 10:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
These seem to be unfree and the PDF file also out of scope.
Stefan4 (talk) 10:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Too blurry to be useful. Tom-L (talk) 10:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:49, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
File:Pilot Training in India Commercial Pilot Training Commercial Pilot License Private Pilot License ,Cheapest pilot Training- HM Aviation.pdf
[edit]This seems to be missing evidence of permission and seems to be out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 10:49, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:49, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alberto Ferraz (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files seem to be commercial music. The uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder.
Stefan4 (talk) 10:51, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alberto Ferraz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Songs. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by G.calvillo99 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
Stefan4 (talk) 10:54, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paulo António zeca (talk · contribs)
[edit]Books and other stuff. The uploader is unlikely to be the author.
- File:Nagreha dos Lamba.jpg
- File:Atlas do Corpo Humano.pdf
- File:100 segredos das pessoas felizes - David Niven.pdf
Stefan4 (talk) 10:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Unidentified people. See COM:PS.
Stefan4 (talk) 10:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Victorcamarta12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope.
Stefan4 (talk) 10:58, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Contains non-free art. Stefan4 (talk) 10:59, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
EXIF credits a Maximilian Motel, while uploader is Coenenr (talk · contribs). Likely copyright violation. Storkk (talk) 11:00, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Antonioquintanillarodriguez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Although it says CC-BY-SA on the file information page, it says CC-BY-NC on the files themselves. CC-BY-NC is not an accepted licence on Commons. The files also seem to be out of scope for Commons.
- File:Seguridad en redes sociales. Guía del alumno.ogv
- File:Seguridad en redes sociales. Guía para alumnos..pdf
- File:Seguridad en redes sociales. Guía para padres.pdf
- File:Seguridad en redes sociales. Guía para profesores (tutores).pdf
Stefan4 (talk) 11:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Stefan4 (talk) 11:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a painting by Keturah Ariel, but I cannot find the original. Uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. Storkk (talk) 11:05, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
It is wrong displayed CoA, see official municipality's web page http://opstina-novigrad.com/ and also http://www.alvrs.com/v1/images/stories/GrboviOpstina/grb%20novi%20grad.jpg C3r4 (talk) 11:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free drawing. Eleassar (t/p) 11:10, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Not sure if this falls under COM:TOO. — regards, Revi 11:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
No FOP In France ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:50, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in France ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:52, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
if the organizational changes every year, I do not see the usefulness of this, what is the year of this one? maybe copyrighted too http://www.fpa2.com/gouvernance.php -- Christian Ferrer 11:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
out of scope and copyrighted http://www.paktron.net/ -- Christian Ferrer 11:54, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of Sculpture in France , No FoP and "authors" still alive post 1945 ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Post 1945- Architecural work - No FoP in france.... ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:58, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 18:43, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 12:00, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecural wotk and lighting design Post 1945, No FoP in France ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 12:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Lighting design and architeucral work post 1945, No FoP in France, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
pretty but no quite notable peoples, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 12:10, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
no quite notable, unused self promotion, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 12:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
This looks like a Commerical logo, and there's no indication the uploader has a connection with the company concerned. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:17, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutal work post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutal work post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutal work post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
unused self promotion of not enough notable people, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 12:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutal/Scultpural work post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Product design, post 1945, no FoP in france ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutal / Sculptural work post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 12:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
not notable peoples, not high resolution and overexposed, unuseful IMO, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 12:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Image fails to meet criteria for free-use; image comes from fan site hosted web gallery. Livelikemusic (talk) 12:35, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutal/scupltural work post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of scultpure post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:38, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of scultpure post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of scultpure post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of architecture post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of architecture post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of architecture post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of scultpure post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:59, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of architecture post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:59, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of sculpture post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:00, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of architecture post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of architecture post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of architecture post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of architecture post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of architecture post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of graphic design post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of architecture post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of architecture/scultpure post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:10, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of scultpure post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of Architecture , Post 1945 - France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of Architecture , Post 1945 - France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of sculpture, Post 1945 - France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
This image infringes on both the copyright for the architecture and for the Mickey Mouse ears. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- And in every possible image on Wikimedia Commons in the category of Disneyland, there is a figure of Mickey Mouse or any possible character from Disney. So? סידני פרסקוט (talk) 11:32, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:03, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope; Not used for educational purposes. Lazlo 13:24, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
EXIF credits a "Chuck Eaton". It is unclear that the uploader Llc220 (talk · contribs), who claims {{Own work}} is this person. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 13:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hayalperestmalatya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," these are both unused and therefore out of scope.
Storkk (talk) 13:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Small size, appears professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
EXIF credits a "Dawson Liu". It is unclear that the uploader, Wiz0501 (talk · contribs) is this person. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 13:35, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:35, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cashewberry138 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Professionally shot, presumably from a magazine shoot, with no evidence that they are freely licensed.
Storkk (talk) 13:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Non-free design. Eleassar (t/p) 13:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:43, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a TV screencap. Storkk (talk) 13:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for statues in the US. The article lists this as the work of a private-sector artist working for a private-sector group, so the exception for US government works doesn't apply. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:58, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for statues in the US. The article lists this as the work of a private-sector artist working for a private-sector group, so the exception for US government works doesn't apply. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:59, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JuliaGOGrover (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:AlfredoDall'Aglio 02.jpg
- File:AlfredoDall'Aglio 01.jpg
- File:AlfredoDall'Aglio 2.jpg
- File:AlfredoDall'Aglio 1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Irlan Biel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Irlan Bíel O Príncipe Do Grööv.jpg
- File:Irlan Bíel Príncipe.jpg
- File:Irlan Bíel O Príncipe.jpg
- File:Irlan Bíel.jpeg
- File:Irlan Bíel e Kaiky Brito.jpeg
- File:Irlan Bíel R.Office Models Management.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from political poster. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Akash karotia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Me and paulina vega.jpg
- File:ImgAkash lal karotia.jpg
- File:How me . ..jpg
- File:Image me .jani.JPG
- File:20130829 007 copy copy.jpg 480 480 0 64000 0 1 0.jpg
- File:Akash karotia.jpg
- File:6 cool two.jpg
- File:3 best n best.jpg
- File:Oay g..jpg
- File:Snap me.JPG
- File:Akash lal karotia.jpg
Ies (talk) 16:22, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Akash karotia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:43, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Véase el alcance del proyecto.
- File:Chicks.jpg
- File:IdolaaG.jpg
- File:Catlove2.jpg
- File:Catlove.jpg
- File:Mi segundo sueño que no se va a cumplir.jpg
- File:Mi sueño que nunca se va a cumplir.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams and text. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Tropped.jpg
- File:Cuarto Sueño.jpg
- File:Cuadrilobat general.png
- File:Lobat y Cuadrilobat.gif
- File:Lobat compuesto.gif
- File:Lobat general.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:44, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
A worse-quality duplicate of File:Postcard of Videm, Dobrepolje 02.jpg. Eleassar (t/p) 14:38, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
No rights, copy from periodical 'Die Alten Sprachen im Unterricht 4, 1997' 109.43.82.189 15:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
No rights, copy from periodical 'Die Alten Sprachen im Unterricht 4, 1997' 109.43.82.189 15:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
No rights, copy from periodical 'Die Alten Sprachen im Unterricht 4, 1997' 109.43.82.189 15:11, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
unused personal image. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:05, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:46, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata. Source seems to translate as "photography". If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Additionally, context such as a meaningful description, title and categorisation are needed to ascertain whether this is realistically educationally useful and falls within our scope. Storkk (talk) 15:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Almost certainly passes the threshold of originality, especially in Australia. Storkk (talk) 15:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Used for vandalism on en.wikipedia: author has been blocked there, should be blocked here too. Smalljim (talk) 15:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Update: I've replaced this with a speedy-delete request, though someone, presumably the vandal (now as an IP) has removed the original deletion request from the page anyway. Smalljim (talk) 15:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
EXIF credits Arkadiusz Jan Zbiżek, and there is no indication that Apustelnik (talk · contribs) is this person or that this image is otherwise freely licensed. Storkk (talk) 15:24, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a derivative (scan) of a derivative (poster) of a derivative (photo) of derivatives (copies of paintings). No indication that the copyright holder at any stage except possibly the last (scan) one has licensed their work freely. Storkk (talk) 15:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
EXIF credits "TTU Maeinsituut". There is no indication that the uploader Iancody (talk · contribs), who is purportedly in the photo, has the right to license this file. Storkk (talk) 15:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:30, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
EXIF credits "Pavel Reband", while the uploader is an Afonskaya88 (talk · contribs). No indication that the uploader is the copyright holder. If kept, this should be renamed under FRC#2. Storkk (talk) 15:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
EXIF credits "Pavel Reband", while the uploader is an Afonskaya88 (talk · contribs). No indication that the uploader is the copyright holder. Storkk (talk) 15:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, watermarked, and subject is in photo. Uploader not likely to be copyright holder. Storkk (talk) 15:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. If kept, this should be renamed under FRC#2. Storkk (talk) 15:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Clear derivative work of copyrighted characters Storkk (talk) 15:41, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
EXIF credits "©FedeGrau". No indication that uploader is this person or that this images is otherwise freely licensed. Storkk (talk) 15:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
text file using Wikimedia as a publishing media, out of Commons:Project scope Anne Bauval (talk) 15:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
From putative source: "All Rights Reserved." Storkk (talk) 15:43, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Small, no metadata, letterboxed: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:43, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 15:46, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
No evidence that copyright holder has licensed this photo under a free license. (Stated source: "Bruce B. Henderson"; Stated author: "Roger Tully"; uploader: RyanZee (talk · contribs)) Storkk (talk) 15:46, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Widely available online, no evidence that uploader is the copyright holder or that it is correctly freely licensed. Storkk (talk) 15:49, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Apparently a derivative of a photo of unclear origin or copyright status. Storkk (talk) 15:50, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
self-promotion, out of project scope
George Chernilevsky talk 15:50, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 15:51, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
copyrighted logo of game company '2K' (this is the only content, and it is outside of the canvas) BMacZero (talk) 15:52, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aso telakoey (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope, unused private photos
George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
SPAM, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:54, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:54, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 15:36, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Krd 16:21, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused non-notable artwork George Chernilevsky talk 15:54, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:54, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Derivative of a number of cliparts of unknown origin, some of which must be {{PD-ineligible}}, and others might be freely licensed, but as it stands, who knows? Storkk (talk) 15:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, possibly a TV screencap: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Almost certainly a TV still. Storkk (talk) 15:58, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 15:58, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Apparently a still from Animal Farm. Storkk (talk) 16:00, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
"All rights reserved" on stated sources. Might be {{PD-US-not renewed}}, but that's not certain at this point. Storkk (talk) 16:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, appears professionally shot and title contains "from Cosmetic Dentistry 4u Manchester" (which I could not immediately find to follow up on): uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Logo, no evidence of claimed CC licence. Source country is the UK where it is probably complex enough for copyright per COM:TOO#United Kingdom. January (talk) 16:11, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Useless without a description 37.5.3.45 16:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused non-notable logo / artwork George Chernilevsky talk 16:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 16:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 16:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 16:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic unused personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 16:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 16:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Dubious "own" work (7 KB, no Exif) 37.5.3.45 16:20, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:20, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NicoleSchnaider2903 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unencyclopedic unused personal images outside our scope.
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 16:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, probable crop of professional photo: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Dubious "own" work. (4 Results on TinEye) 37.5.3.45 16:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 16:24, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work, original source unclear. Storkk (talk) 16:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Dubious "own" work (5 KB, no EXIF) 37.5.3.45 16:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status + unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded locally at enwiki in 05.2008 by en:User:Gethomas3 ("Germaine Thomas", blocked since 2009 + sock of "SuperSonicx1986") the photo was most likely grabbed & photoshopped from http://www.worldstadiums.com (© World Stadiums), considering the watermark removed (see related edited area) comparing it with this (more sharply) version (still available here). Gunnex (talk) 16:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Per above, nominating also
uploaded locally at enwiki in 02.2008 for en:Rheinstadion (demolished 2002), here credited with "Author: Chris Jones" which does not fit with uploader's name "Germaine Thomas". Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 16:54, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:30, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
The background monument alone would have been encyclopedic to use. But the subject here is outside our scope and also unused. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 16:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aawaiz Jutt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unencyclopedic unused personal images outside our scope.
- File:Dashing.JPG
- File:Future Model.jpg
- File:Aawaiz Iqbal.jpg
- File:Jutt.jpg
- File:A ChildStar.JPG
- File:Aawaiz Jutt.jpg
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 16:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zohaanalimirza (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope. Personal photos used in deleted NN bio en:Mohammad Farhan Khan
JohnCD (talk) 16:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I've indeffed all three of these accounts on en.wiki and suggest the same here. Khanfarhan437 keeps trying to make an article on himself and in this case, he tried to hijack someone else's article.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 17:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I've indeffed all three of these accounts on en.wiki and suggest the same here. Khanfarhan437 keeps trying to make an article on himself and in this case, he tried to hijack someone else's article.
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Too bad quality, out of scope. /St1995 16:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Personal unencyclopaedic images outside our scope.
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 16:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope; unused personal files; not a selfie repository.
TJH2018talk 21:48, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Personal unencyclopaedic images outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 16:46, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
No permission 37.5.3.45 16:59, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Personal images outside our scope.
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 17:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
no permission 37.5.3.45 17:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
no permission 37.5.3.45 17:30, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.3.45 17:58, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
no permission 37.5.3.45 18:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing/inconsistent EXIF, complex architectural sketch, uploaded 06.2007 by Cosmo.vnz~commonswiki (talk · contributions · Statistics) per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Cosmo.vnz~commonswiki + comment and http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=375760&page=17 (03.2007, © by "·.·´¯`·.·JoSé·.·´¯`·.·") or http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=10807225&postcount=94 (2006, © by "Rbs" = (for both) http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p293/beachpow/61360fotoui7.jpg~original (last modified: 2006, © by "beachpow") or http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=13327945&postcount=67 (05.2007, © by "WG-85") = http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p277/WG-85/61360fotoui7ve5gv8.jpg~original Gunnex (talk) 18:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Per above, nominating also:
- File:Merida Stadium.jpg (uploaded locally in 06.2007 by en:User:Cosmo.vnz)
--> grabbed from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=13110791&postcount=217 (05.2007, © by "SusanaFernandez") = http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w308/666generation/este-tenis-10-05-07.jpg~original (by © "666generation"). Gunnex (talk) 19:49, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Nominating also:
- File:EstadioCaracas.jpg (uploaded locally in 06.2007 by en:User:Cosmo.vnz)
--> grabbed from (example) http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=10909434&postcount=39 (2006, © by "Rbs") = http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p293/beachpow/caracaspri.jpg~original (© by "beachpow")
And, considering above "program", nominating, per COM:PRP, all files from this enwiki/Commons user:
- File:Unicorncoasterpic.jpg
- File:Stadium Puerto La Cruz.jpg
- File:Maracaibo Stadium.jpg
- File:Puerto Ordaz Stadium.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 20:07, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused non-notable promotion George Chernilevsky talk 18:30, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 18:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
self-promotion, out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 18:48, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 18:49, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 18:52, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 18:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 18:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
No FOP in Denemark 46.151.215.123 06:11, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
No FOP in Denemark 46.151.215.123 06:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Depicted installation obviously recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works in the U.S. So, permission or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:31, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Depicted sculpture obviously recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works in the U.S. So, permission or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Depicted sculpture obviously recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works in the U.S. So, permission or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Depicted statue obviously recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works in the U.S. So, permission or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Depicted statue obviously recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works in the U.S. So, permission or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Harvy Villalobos (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope, unused photos of a non-notable promo event
- File:Conferencia Fotografos al mundo.jpg
- File:Tour 2014 con fotógrafos al mundo.jpg
- File:Charla de sistemas de impresión fotográfica.jpg
- File:Conferencia Fotógrafos de Bodas.jpg
- File:Muestra física de impresión CMYK.jpg
- File:Espacios de color.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 18:43, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sentrifugo (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope, unused non-notable promo / logo / screenshots
- File:Sentrifugo Roadmap.jpg
- File:Wiki-pic.jpg
- File:User Management settings.jpg
- File:Sentrifugo-logo.png
- File:Manage Modules.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 19:00, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
too small for education, so, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
SPAM, out of project scope, unused non-notable promo
George Chernilevsky talk 19:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lisabexchieva (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope, unused private photos of non-notable person
- File:Лиза бехчиева топ модель 2014-07-03 22-17.JPG
- File:Лиза бехчиева топ модель 2014-07-03 22-15.JPG
- File:Лиза бехчиева- 2014-07-03 22-14.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 19:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 19:10, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 19:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by العقرباوي و بس (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope, unused private artwork
- File:اللهم آمين 2014-07-04 18-14.jpg
- File:فلسطينية و أفتخر 2014-07-03 22-56.jpg
- File:يجب علينا شكر الله على كل شيء دائماً و أبدا- 2014-07-03 22-55.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 19:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Oddly twisted strucure and pixelated; unused, have File:Tricyclo 4.2.2.02,5 deca-3,7,9-triene1.png that looks cleaner DMacks (talk) 19:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 19:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Personal photo of non notorious person that tries to use Wikipedia to promote himself (pt:User:Arielirra. Stego (talk) 19:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Non-free image. Appears taken from http://odonoghueross.com/page.php?page_id=331 which states "© 2005 - 2015 Tighe O'Donoghue/Ross All Rights Reserved" Ahecht (talk) 19:17, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Non-free image. Appears to be copied from http://odonoghueross.com/project.php?project_id=65 which states "© 2005 - 2015 Tighe O'Donoghue/Ross All Rights Reserved " Ahecht (talk) 19:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Non-free image. Appears to be copied from http://odonoghueross.com/page.php?page_id=336 which states "© 2005 - 2015 Tighe O'Donoghue/Ross All Rights Reserved " Ahecht (talk) 19:20, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
This is a reproduction of a 2D work of art which is not in the public domain. Copyright would be held by the artist Thomas O'Donoghue. Ahecht (talk) 19:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Chemical mistake (missing nitrogen). Tagged for over a month, have File:Cyclopyrrolone-2D-skeletal.png as correct replacment. DMacks (talk) 19:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
This is a reproduction of a 2D work of art which is not in the public domain. Copyright would be held by the artist Thomas O'Donoghue. Ahecht (talk) 19:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
This is yet another version of previously deleted File:Prasenjit Sen.jpg, and File:Publication3.png, low res crops of image http://news.tju.edu.cn/headline/201411/W020141104334189598153.jpg on a Chinese university website, unlikely to be uploader's own work as claimed. Worldbruce (talk) 19:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Low res crop of image http://www.dhakatribune.com/entertainment/2014/jul/04/azad-abul-kalam-collective-effort-needed-improve-tv-industry on a Bangladesh newspaper website where it is attributed to Prajna Tasnuva Rubayet, unlikely to be uploader's work as claimed Worldbruce (talk) 19:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Re-uploaded copyright violation. GeorgHH • talk 17:37, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:02, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Contains wrong information (McDonalds info is incorrect). It is my picture (original uploader). Rayukk (talk) 19:43, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Matiia (talk) 19:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Angelo Marcial Rei Noe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Familia unida.jpg
- File:Eu e o meu puto.jpg
- File:Pc.jpg
- File:Disco do rei.jpg
- File:Irmaos.jpg
- File:Rei Noe.jpg
- File:Noesio.jpg
- File:Olhos de gato.jpg
Ies (talk) 19:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 19:58, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Photo of original, copyrighted box art without release – czar 20:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Withdrawnand instead nominated as speedy copyvio. – czar 20:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Comment Does the cover really meet threshold of originality ? Thibaut120094 (talk) 20:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I suppose I need to reinstate my support for deletion with the speedy removed. I'd agree with Amitie that, at the very least, the Mario image is an original composition. (Though I would be interested to hear arguments against, especially since the Mario is an enlarged 16x12 pixel sprite design.) – czar 23:43, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: Unfortunatelly above the COM:TOO, specially for the Mario design. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
The version on en.wiki has been deleted, as the required OTRS permission was never received. The copyright holder is Mark Tushman. Diannaa (talk) 20:05, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violations of logo's and complete design dating from 1982 Elly (talk) 20:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Confusingly-drawn (see annotation) lower-resolution version of File:3,6,9-Methylidynetetracyclo 6.1.0.02,4.05,7 nonane.png DMacks (talk) 20:47, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Temporary logo without any particular meaning failed to be replaced by a real one within 6 years. Article linked to file was deleted on EN-wiki. Archie02 (talk) 20:48, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Worse-quality version of File:Postcard of Ljubljana, view from Castle (21).jpg. Eleassar (t/p) 20:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karl-Gilbert Murray (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non free artwork, authorization not provided. Œuvres d'art protégées par le droit d'auteur, autorisation non fournie.
- File:ED2014.JPG
- File:ED1.jpg
- File:Renée1.jpg
- File:Renée.jpg
- File:ChristineP11.jpg
- File:ChristineP.jpg
- File:Louise2.jpg
- File:ARL1.jpg
- File:AL2014.JPG
- File:Perfo JZ FIFA....jpg
- File:BonnieD.JPG
- File:HannahC.JPG
- File:MichaelB1.jpg
- File:MichealB.jpg
- File:Copy of DSCF00101.jpg
- File:EdPi.jpeg
- File:JoaJac.jpg
- File:FrédéSaia.jpg
- File:Al4.jpg
- File:AL3.jpg
- File:AL2.jpg
- File:AL1.jpg
- File:AL61.jpg
- File:Al5.jpg
- File:Johannes Zits 5.jpg
- File:Johannes Zits.JPG
- File:Ed Pien Wallpaper23.JPG
- File:Ed Pien Wallpaper 1.JPG
- File:Ed Pien Wallpaper.JPG
- File:53-Jim Verburg.JPG
- File:52-Jim Verburg.JPG
- File:51-Jim Verburg.JPG
- File:5-Jim Verburg.JPG
- File:43-Ed Pien.jpg
- File:42-Ed Pien.jpg
- File:41-Ed Pien.jpg
- File:4-Ed Pien.jpg
- File:372-Evergon.jpg
- File:36-Evergon.jpg
- File:324-Evergon.jpg
- File:37-Evergon.jpg
- File:38-Evergon.jpg
- File:39-Evergon.jpg
- File:35-Evergon.jpg
- File:34-Evergon.jpg
- File:33-Evergon.jpg
- File:32-Evergon.jpg
- File:31-Evergon.jpg
- File:3-Evergon.jpg
- File:23-Attila Richard Lukacs.jpg
- File:22-Attila Richard Lukacs.jpg
- File:21-Attila Richard Lukacs.jpg
- File:2-Attila Richard Lukacs.jpg
- File:Daniel St-Aubin.jpg
- File:Attila et Diane.JPG
- File:15-Le Corps gay.JPG
- File:14-Le Corps gay.jpg
- File:13-Le Corps gay.jpg
- File:Le Corps gay..jpg
- File:Le Corps gay.jpg
- File:Alain Laframboise, Le sens du quotidien.jpg
kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 21:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. This is not a work by Agência Brasil, considering the credit "Maiquel Torcatt/ABN) at source. ABN stands for (see also exif) "Agencia Bolivariana de Noticias". Usually, photos from photographers of Agência Brasil are tagged with [Name of photographer/Agência Brasil] (or "Abr") and photos from other sources are credited according to the source. Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 21:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
It is not clear where this file was taken from, but this was not the logo of the Israeli-originated TV series. This file is a photoshop version of the logo, and is misleading. Therefore, it does not belong to the Commons. The logo is copyrighted and I don't think that this variant is approved but the production. The real logo can be seen here, at the series' website. Ldorfman (talk) 22:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
128 khpnmj 197.41.214.245 23:05, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
This image appeared on the Daily Mail website on 18 July 2013, some months before being uploaded to Commons. I don't think the newspaper owns the copyright but I haven't been able to find the original source. However, the EXIF data suggests the author is ArvindK which doesn't look like the uploader username. Green Giant (talk) 23:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Фото взято, скорее всего, отсюда http://www.kinopoisk.ru/picture/2392498/#. Много данных изображений встречается в Интернете до загрузки файла на Викисклад. Dogad75 (talk) 23:30, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
омнения в авторстве и лицензии. Встречается в Интернете до загрузки файла на Викисклад http://izvestia.ru/news/571069, http://www.business-gazeta.ru/article/7503/ Dogad75 (talk) 23:43, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: авторство принадлежит фотографу, а не изображённому лицу. Dogad75 (talk) 23:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ola.saurabh (talk · contribs)
[edit]These images show artwork at fairs such as IITF in India and might be covered by {{freedom of panorama}} but I am not sure that these works are permanently on display. In particular, the IITF takes place over a fortnight in November each year, so it is almost certain that these works will be moved or dismantled at the end of the fair.
- File:A mural in an art show at Pragati Maidan.jpg
- File:Model of West Bengal Pavilion in IITF 2012.jpg
- File:Gujarat Pavilion at IITF 2012.jpg
Green Giant (talk) 23:51, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Сомнения авторстве и лицензии, см. http://www.prokopiv.com/photo.html Dogad75 (talk) 00:00, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
This picture is a montage made by schoolchildren to make a joke on the fr.Wikipedia "Ratel" page (in reality, this animal does not exist in France)
- BerAnth (talk) 09:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
PS : The addition of this photo on the french "Ratel" page has been canceled by an administrator: https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ratel&diff=116261001&oldid=116260928 - BerAnth (talk) 09:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
PPS : this picture was used for the montage. - BerAnth (talk) 18:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:56, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed," this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. Missed the enwiki article. Storkk (talk) 10:30, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - I have nominated the en wiki article for deletion. The subject claims to be just a web-admin working for a political party. We can revisit this DR once the notability issue is sorted on Wikipedia. Also, there is another image of same subject File:Rajat Das.jpg. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Auto-promo at best. Yann (talk) 11:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Post 1945 Archtecural work - No FoP in france. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:59, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The fort is a building with simple timbers under the threshold of originality. --Tangopaso (talk) 21:50, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: under the threshold of originality. Yann (talk) 11:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Post 1945 Architectural work - no FoP in france ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:59, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep There are several buildings on the photo. So no-FOP in France doesnt not apply here. And the buildings are only wooden houses. They dont pass the threshold of originality. --Tangopaso (talk) 22:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: under the threshold of originality. Yann (talk) 11:59, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutral work , post `1945, No FoP in france. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:00, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep On the photo, we see tipis, not buildings following architectural rules. They are not enough original to be copyrighted. They dont pass the threshold of originality. --Tangopaso (talk) 22:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No (c) on tipis. The background building is DM. Yann (talk) 12:00, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutal work post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Might not reach the threshold of originality. Just train platforms and escalators. No particular architecture there. Jeriby (talk) 14:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep les escalators peu concernés par la liberté de panorama... --Aga (d) 19:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:02, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutal work post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Might not reach the threshold of originality. Just train platforms and escalators. No particular architecture there. Jeriby (talk) 14:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. I cropped the ad. Yann (talk) 12:03, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutal work post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The building in background is De Minimis (moreover not an original architecture). The main subject of the picture is the train. Picture can be cropped if it is really needed, but not sure it is. Jeriby (talk) 14:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:04, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutal work, and train shape design, post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Just clearly De Minimis, the main subjects of the picture are the trains. Jeriby (talk) 14:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:04, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutal work post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Architectural works are De Minimis here. The main subjects of the picture are the train and the platform which is not architecturally original enough. Jeriby (talk) 14:38, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:05, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutal work post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Architectural works are De Minimis here. The main subjects of the picture are the trains and the platform which is not architecturally original enough. Jeriby (talk) 14:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:05, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutal work post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Architectural works are De Minimis here. The main subjects of the picture are the trains and the platform which is not architecturally original enough. Jeriby (talk) 14:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:05, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutal work post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Architectural works are De Minimis here. The main subjects of the picture are the train and the platform which is not architecturally original enough. Jeriby (talk) 14:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:05, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of Sculpture/designn post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:58, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep As per Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Vehicles: "Current Commons policy allows images of vehicles on the basis that the 3D shape of a vehicle will not normally be entitled to copyright protection." InverseHypercube 02:29, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep as per above. Jeriby (talk) 07:50, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:09, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of Sculpture/designn post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:58, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep As per Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Vehicles: "Current Commons policy allows images of vehicles on the basis that the 3D shape of a vehicle will not normally be entitled to copyright protection." InverseHypercube 02:30, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep as per above. Jeriby (talk) 07:50, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:11, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of architecture post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:59, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Buildings in background are De Minimis, this is a simple street view. Jeriby (talk) 15:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. General view. Yann (talk) 12:11, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of architecture post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- @ShakespeareFan00: Which part do you consider original enough to be covered by copyright in the first place? I just see a blank wall with some text. Multichill (talk) 20:48, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- It's the design of the top of the wall I was concerned about. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:35, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:12, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
exact duplicate of File:NAnelka.jpg H4stings (talk) 14:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:13, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dago labe luc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images
- File:WIN 20150403 095516.JPG
- File:WIN 20150430 130124.JPG
- File:WIN 20150410 090702.JPG
- File:WIN 20150418 111519.JPG
INeverCry 23:46, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Please delete (replaced with File:Систематический свод существующих законов РИ.png). Uploader request. Thank you. Hausratte (talk) 18:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 18:19, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine - 1976 statue per uk:Файл:Львівським політехнікам, полеглим у роки Другої світової війни.JPG INeverCry 22:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No FoP in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 18:19, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine - modern plaque with 3D relief - marked "1950-95" INeverCry 23:17, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks INeverCry for letting me know. I store the file somewhere until the unfortunate Free Panorama Law № 1677 will be passed by our Parliament. Mykola Swarnyk (talk) 00:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No FoP in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine - 1972 monument INeverCry 23:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No FoP in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 18:22, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine - 1994 monument INeverCry 23:24, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No FoP in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 18:22, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine - modern monument to uk:Федун Петро Миколайович who died in 1951 INeverCry 23:43, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No FoP in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine - modern memorial bust of gentleman who died in 1984 INeverCry 23:50, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No FoP in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saint-brains jc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope and unused. Commons is not a venue to publish unpublished philosophical considerations.
- File:Chaîne documentaire Projet.pdf
- File:Modes relationnels.pdf
- File:Modes relationnels 3 détails.pdf
- File:Réciprocité éthique3.pdf
- File:Dynamique humaine.pdf
- File:Attentes2.pdf
- File:Ethiques.pdf
- File:Univers activite.pdf
- File:Dynamique des Motivations humaines.pdf
- File:Ethique 2.pdf
— Racconish 📥 06:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC) modified 15:33, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. These non-image format files does not match to the project scope [3]. About PDF : "a user-created original-research article that is making use of Commons as a free web-host may not be [relevant]". And this copyrighted original research is not realistically useful for an educational purpose.--La femme de menage (talk) 03:51, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Je demande le maintien de ces documents dont la teneur est certes originale mais correspond à des travaux personnels développés depuis plus de 20 ans. dont enseignement universitaire
sur le "management de la qualité" à L'UBS de LOrient
Je n'accepterais que des contributions objective et pertinentes de personnes justifiant de réelles competences - en Psychologie : "dynamique humaine","attentes" ; - en management et sociologie : "modes relationnels"; - en philosophie & sociologie : "ethiques", "univers d'activité".
J'ai note que Presque toutes ces contributions ont été citées comme "notables"... sans doute par un inconsequent ?
J'ai compris tardivement que le format PD F posait (poserait) probleme sur sa difficulté de transposition traduite ou l'emploi par outils de projection pédagogique. Je n'ai pas les moyens de les convertir en format plus universel que je vais tenter de trouver. Or j'ai constaté que de nombreux documents De Wiki common étaient en format PDF.
J'ai la faiblesse de penser que cette contribution est juste et fondée et adhere totalement à une libre exploitation ce qui a motive mon adhesion sans faille à l'esprit de gratuité et de partage de Wikipedia. Indiquez-moi où j'ai commis une erreur d'appréciation. Saint-brains --Saint-brains jc (talk) 13:23, 25 June 2015 (UTC) Saint-brains
J'ai tenté de convertir certains fichiers en .jpg ou .gif avec des résultats déplorables. J'ai pu constater que les fichiers .pdf incorporés au (feu) texte que j'avais inséré avaient une qualité remarquable dans le plus fort grossisement possible. Je suppose que PDF fonctionne en mode "vectorisé" et donc que toute donnée graphique, texte compris, était régénéré en affichage avec donc une resolution optimisée. Je pense que là est l'essentiel !
Je suis depuis plus de quinze ans le genie d'Adope et de son procédé d'"encapsulage" des objets graphiques, l'Etat communique ses documents en format PDF comme mon la boratoire d'analyses médicales ...
Je ne comprend donc pas pourquoi ce format est interdit. WIkipédia est'elle une idée d'avant garde empétrée dans des formalismes handicapant ?; Le format PDF que je sache est reconnu par tous les types de conversions graphiques. Saint-brains --Saint-brains jc (talk) 15:26, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. The key point here is not the format but the content: original unpublished research with no perspective of being used in a project of the Wikimedia Foundation. — Racconish 📥 15:46, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Mille excuse mais alors pourquoi PDF ne figure-t-il pas en liste préconisée. Tous les themes auxquels j'ai rattaché les documents existent bien !
Je ne comprends pas que des inédits soient refusés alors que l'importation demande si l'intervenant est bien l'auteur. Peut-être cela veut-il dire que le sujet ne peut être que la vue sous un angle nouveau d'une idée, expression ou representation "officialisée" ... par qui ?
Wikipedia - media ne sont-ils que des bachotages étriqués ou des Musées ... ou cimetières où on s'incline devant la mémoire des illustres anciens et ...on se tait !!! Le schema "Ethiques" que je proposais avait la vocation de structurer les arguments des divers chapîtres qui, en l'état, sont redondants et sans ossature, voire contradictoires. saint-brains --Saint-brains jc (talk) 14:28, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
J'ai compris - car le système de gestion me semble encore adolescent que les themes que j'avais indiqués avaient le défaut d'être en français et non retenus. Victime de l'intendance ! Saint-brains--Saint-brains jc (talk) 15:56, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Same as previous DR
— Racconish 📥 06:48, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 22:07, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saint-brains jc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope and unused. Commons is not a venue to publish unpublished philosophical considerations
- File:Besoins attentes.pdf
- File:Genèse concept innovant.pdf
- File:Concept innovant.pdf
- File:La Recherche vision globale.pdf
— Racconish 📥 06:34, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Recreation of previous deleted files. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:05, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
This is not Fe(NO3)3*9H2O or contains a lot of impurities. Real Fe(NO3)3*9H2O is pale purple (cf. http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/Graphics/COfAInfo/SigmaSAPQM/SPEC/21/216828/216828-BULK_______SIAL_____.pdf). A File:Fe III nitrate.jpg can be used instead. Michał Sobkowski (talk) 09:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- This is true, I just checked in our lab and real iron(III) nitrate is pale purple. This sample was quite old, so possibly contained impurities. I still think it's worth keeping in the archives for reference. --Ben (talk) 12:11, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Agree with replacing it in existing article uses as obviously not the intended meaning. Support keeping it per Ben's comment (Fe2O3 is a known decomposition product) with Description field updated to indicate that it is not pure. Does this sample still exist for performing elemental analysis, magnetic susceptibility or other test? DMacks (talk) 19:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Given the length of time it has existed at this filename, I wonder if this image should be moved to a different name and the "real" image of it be placed here? That's just akin to uploading an improved image of the subject at this location. Or else just scrapping this filename altogether since it has a long history of containing not-what-it-claims? My concerns are about external users who might continue to be linking here...should we suddenly give them the right thing, or not change what they had expected to be seeing based on when they linked it? DMacks (talk) 17:49, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. If you have access to a better sample Ben, it sounds prudent to replace all usage with a new photo. I've amended the file description. 99of9 (talk) 05:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Planned landscaping and architectruial work post 1945, no FoP in france ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep For me the buildings in background are De Minimis. As stated in the file name, the main subject of the picture is the lake. Jeriby (talk) 14:30, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Agree with Jeriby. I should not say better. --Tangopaso (talk) 22:11, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Per discussion and IRC advice - Withdrawn but with the caveat FOP-France tag's inclusion is subject to a seprate disscusion. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- I am the uploader. I put the FOP-France tag in all images where there is a building in De-Minimis. In order to avoid the creation of a derivative file with the building as main subject.
- And I dont understand : you say that the DR is yet pending. But the DR template has been removed from the file. --Tangopaso (talk) 17:33, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- DR is Withdrawn The image stays ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:11, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn by nominator without prejudice to a renomination (IMO the buildings are not COM:DM) 99of9 (talk) 05:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Planned landcapsing and architectural design post 1945, No FoP in France ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:07, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The building in background is De Minimis. The street is just surrounded with trees and grass, which in not copyrightable IMHO. Jeriby (talk) 15:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn - per disscusion, have added {[tl|FoP-France}} ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:19, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn by nominator. 99of9 (talk) 05:37, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
No FOP in France. See comments
- File:Tom Simpson memorial, 1 October 2009.jpg
- File:Tom Simpson memorial, 29 December 2006 (cropped).jpg
- File:Tom Simpson memorial, 29 December 2006.jpg
- File:Tom Simpson memorial, 4 August 2014.jpg
- File:Tom Simpson memorial, 6 September 2009.jpg
- File:Tom Simpson memorial, Mont Ventoux, 2 May 2009.jpg
- File:Tom Simpson memorial, Mont Ventoux, 20 September 2011.jpg
- File:Tommy Simpson memoriale Ventoux (cropped).jpg
- File:Tommy Simpson memoriale Ventoux.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Two files seem to be OK, if we follow the thought that the monument is not the main focus of the photo:
- No. 06 File:Tom Simpson memorial, Mont Ventoux, 20 September 2011.jpg
- No. 07 File:Tom Simpson memorial, Mont Ventoux, 2 May 2009.jpg
Please check the VP discussion as well: VP - FOP France
Comments please? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I would agree that the two you picked out (6 and 7) should be definitely ok, as both seem to clearly be 'landscape' photos where the monument is not the main focus, and they don't clearly show the design of the monument itself. It would not have been possible to photograph what appears to have been the intended subject matter without including the monument
- For the others, I would quote the translation we have at COM:FOP#France... "Case law states that the said artwork must not be intentionally included as an element of the setting: its presence in the picture must be unavoidable". The steps, and the pile of stuff on them, could be easily depicted without displaying the entire monument. If it was the apparent intent of the photographer to depict the monument 'itself' in the work, even as an aspect of a wider scene, then I don't think it's allowable. Revent (talk) 01:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- First of all, thanks to Hedwig in Washington for the notification in my talk. What can I say? I had at home a photo, taken from my parents a long time ago, that I decided to scan and put on wiki commons (I vaguely remember that I was prompted to do that since I did not see any photo in some page that I was looking at). If it has to be deleted due to some law, no problem. I feel emotionally connected to that photo, so I feel regret for that, but this is my concern.
- From the general point of view, I find ridiculous that on wiki commons are left the two images selected. The interest of readers is in the monument, not on some people around it or on irrelevant additional elements in the photo. They are disturbing (sorry for the people affected, nothing personal in this). Do you imagine any serious encyclopedia that offers photos like that (unless it is the very only one image available)? There should be some better solution. Even paying for getting the permission to use a nice shot, is a better solution! --Fioravante Patrone (talk) 06:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I agree to this point of view. If there is any problem with the Tom Simpson memorial, we should delete all the images. The two selected images are suitable for private use only, but not for wikimedia. --BlueBreezeWiki (talk) 07:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- FWIW, I was just addressing the issue raised (the Freedom of Panorama issue regarding the copyright on the monument), and not the 'value' of the other ones. I don't think they are particularly great, to be honest, I just don't see that there are FOP issues with them. As far as 'encyclopedic' use, I have no doubt that an image of the monument would be fine under the fair use rules on English Wikipedia, at least (and probably other projects as well).Revent (talk) 09:17, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- It sounds to me that Fioravante Patrone is slightly bitter? File:Tom Simpson memorial, Mont Ventoux, 2 May 2009.jpg is definitely not focusing on the monument. It is and hopefully will be use on a featured article, en:Tom Simpson. Your opinion that it's "disturbing" is tosh, as in the article it illustrates the monument as a place of pilgrimage to cyclists. BaldBoris 17:22, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- FWIW, I was just addressing the issue raised (the Freedom of Panorama issue regarding the copyright on the monument), and not the 'value' of the other ones. I don't think they are particularly great, to be honest, I just don't see that there are FOP issues with them. As far as 'encyclopedic' use, I have no doubt that an image of the monument would be fine under the fair use rules on English Wikipedia, at least (and probably other projects as well).Revent (talk) 09:17, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I agree to this point of view. If there is any problem with the Tom Simpson memorial, we should delete all the images. The two selected images are suitable for private use only, but not for wikimedia. --BlueBreezeWiki (talk) 07:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: with 2 exceptions, as per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:40, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Oddbodz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Use of First logo in author created work - this train with that logo has never existed so it is not author's original work Rail experts! :) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:42, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Stefan4 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free software. Maybe some graphics wiz can remove the copyrighted parts or blur them? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:14, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as per COM:PRP. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:49, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Blurry, there is a superior alternative Tom-L (talk) 10:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I only see one other photo. --Fæ (talk) 10:54, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, but that other photo is from the exact same angle and is clear enough to see the details. Also, I think the other guy got to photograph it without the glass around it, which I couldn't. :p Tom-L (talk) 11:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: yes, it's of poor quality, but only 1 other photo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:51, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
French copyright law does not allow you to take photographs of text without permission from the one who wrote the text. Stefan4 (talk) 12:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- As a matter of form: French copyright law cannot prohibit text from being photographed. It might prohibit photographs of text from being published. If so, I was not aware that an exhibit label of this type, in a public museum could be under copyright, and I must apologize if that's the case here. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:50, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Taking photos of text is only permitted if you take the photo for your own personal use. If you take the photo for some other purpose, such as for the purpose of uploading the text to Commons, then you can be fined for taking the photograph, from what I have understood. It is also prohibited to distribute the photograph once the photograph has been created. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:57, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- You can be fined if and when you intentionally use the photo for a prohibited purpose, and that use is then what you are fined for, but not the taking of the photograph. You've turned things around a bit, and I don't think it's a good idea to create unnecessary nerve pangs by spreading that kind of thing around. You can also be punished if you take photographs where it has been clearly posted or announced that photography is forbidden. That, and invading privacy in an illegal way, are the only times you can get in trouble for the actual taking of a photo.
- I see a veiled threat in what you wrote. Since it's impossible to get to know you at all through your rather unusual user page, I really don't know what kind of a possible expert and/or authority I'm dealing with here.
- I've now checked, anyway, and in this case, the photographer was being given a VIP tour of that museum, to which he presented a considerable gift, and it had been made quite clear by the museum's manager Mr. Jean-Marc Baradat, that Mr. Demitz was allowed to photograph whatever he wanted, unconditionally. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 08:37, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- You can be forced to pay compensation to the rightsholder both for intentional and for unintentional use, and also for creation of copies even if the copies aren't distributed. If you are looking at the Swedish copyright law, then maybe you have overlooked the fact that there also are conditions in 54 § and not only in 53 §. 53 § (which states that you may for example be sent to prison for up to two years) only applies if copyright was violated intentionally or with gross neglect, but 54 § applies for all violations.
- Is there a reason to believe that the museum would be the copyright holder? The copyright holder to text is normally the person who wrote the text. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:51, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- Are you threatening me, and in doing so using Swedish law in regard to a photo taken with permission in a museum in France? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:29, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- Taking photos of text is only permitted if you take the photo for your own personal use. If you take the photo for some other purpose, such as for the purpose of uploading the text to Commons, then you can be fined for taking the photograph, from what I have understood. It is also prohibited to distribute the photograph once the photograph has been created. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:57, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:56, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Work of ardchitecure/ design , Post 1945 - France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep For the building in background might be De Minimis. For the fireworks I don't know if it's copyrighted. Jeriby (talk) 14:59, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn - Primary focus isn't the building.. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:21, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:57, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Por que en esa foto salgo yo y no quiero que este. UrsulaDelgado (talk) 21:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: personal photo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:01, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 20:55, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- It is now in use on es:Kilian Delgado (Actor). No comment on long term worthiness of the article. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:53, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Kept: in use Alan (talk) 01:23, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Por que en la imagen salgo yo y no quiero que este! UrsulaDelgado (talk) 21:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:03, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Depicted statue obviously recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works in the U.S. So, permission or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I've been able to contact the artist's family and they are planning on giving permission (fingers crossed - they are currently traveling). Please give at most a week and a few days for them to get back home, check their email and reply back. Thanks! Hanyou23 (talk) 00:02, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Sure. I would prefer that the image can remain. --Túrelio (talk) 06:25, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- I'm anticipating one more day before permission is sent to OTRS - have contacted the artist's daughter by phone today and hopefully all will be well. Please do not add the OTRS coding at this time - I will once the email is sent to OTRS. Thanks! Hanyou23 (talk) 19:25, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- In addition, the artist's daughter was requesting three days, so it could be as many as that. Hanyou23 (talk) 23:12, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hmmm, if I don't hear from the artist's family over the weekend, I'll try contacting them one more time via email and see if they have any questions. Man~..... Hanyou23 (talk) 22:05, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
- Sure. I would prefer that the image can remain. --Túrelio (talk) 06:25, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Time's up. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:18, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Depicted statues obviously recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works in the U.S. So, permission or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I have requested permission and am waiting to hear back. Please give a week at most for the artist to reply back before deleting. Thanks! Hanyou23 (talk) 23:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Sure. I would prefer that the image can remain. --Túrelio (talk) 06:24, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- The artist has given permission to allow the photo to be on WC... will be sending him the OTRS email tomorrow or the next day (still compiling/composing it). Hanyou23 (talk) 05:39, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- OTRS permission form has been sent to artist as of yesterday - please give a couple more days for it to be filled out by the artist and sent to OTRS. Please do not add OTRS coding to at this time - I will add it once the email is sent to OTRS. Thanks! Hanyou23 (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- The artist has given permission to allow the photo to be on WC... will be sending him the OTRS email tomorrow or the next day (still compiling/composing it). Hanyou23 (talk) 05:39, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- Sure. I would prefer that the image can remain. --Túrelio (talk) 06:24, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
If I don't hear back form the artist over the weekend, I'll email him one more time on Monday... I think the OTRS email scared him, too..... Hanyou23 (talk) 22:07, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Time's up Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:18, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Depicted statues obviously recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works in the U.S. So, permission or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Artist contacted, please give a week at most to receive permission before deleting. Hanyou23 (talk) 00:52, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Sure. I would prefer that the image can remain. --Túrelio (talk) 06:26, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Artist has been contacted by phone and will give permission... anticipate a day to a week before the OTRS email is sent (artist is going to a family wedding in a couple of days and will be gone for a week). Please do not add OTRS coding at this time - I will once the email is sent. Thanks! Hanyou23 (talk) 19:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- Written permission received; OTRS email sent to artist... probably a day or a week (or possibly a little more than a week) until the OTRS email is filled out and sent to the OTRS team. Please do not add OTRS code at this time - not sure if it will be a day or a week(+). Hanyou23 (talk) 02:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- Artist has been contacted by phone and will give permission... anticipate a day to a week before the OTRS email is sent (artist is going to a family wedding in a couple of days and will be gone for a week). Please do not add OTRS coding at this time - I will once the email is sent. Thanks! Hanyou23 (talk) 19:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- Sure. I would prefer that the image can remain. --Túrelio (talk) 06:26, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Assuming that the artist has left for that wedding today or yesterday??? Oh well, whichever day, she'll be back home in a week. It sounds like she won't be using her email during the wedding trip... so, one week maybe (hopefully)? Thanks for your patience! Hanyou23 (talk) 19:07, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- OTRS email has been submitted to OTRS by the artist and all should be good once they have a look at it! Yay!!! Hanyou23 (talk) 21:57, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, there seems to be confusion on who took the photograph (facepalm heh)... working it out now. Good ol' FoP stuff..... Hanyou23 (talk) 17:22, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- A permission statement has now been received at OTRS from the sculptor as well as the photographer.--Sphilbrick (talk) 17:01, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- That's great. Please put the ticket on the image page. Thank you, Hanyou23, for your effort. --Túrelio (talk) 19:09, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- A permission statement has now been received at OTRS from the sculptor as well as the photographer.--Sphilbrick (talk) 17:01, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, there seems to be confusion on who took the photograph (facepalm heh)... working it out now. Good ol' FoP stuff..... Hanyou23 (talk) 17:22, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
No problem! I see the OTRS code there - I guess the ticket is just hiding (?)..... Hanyou23 (talk) 17:13, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Kept per above --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:21, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Depicted statue obviously recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works in the U.S. So, permission or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hi! The Smoke Signal was installed in 1935 (by Ellis Luis Burman) as a WPA project and does not have a copyright notice that I know of. Thank you! Hanyou23 (talk) 11:52, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The link suggests that the statue is {{PD-US-no notice}}. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:12, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per Stefan4 Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:28, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, but the artist, who created these paintings, died only in 2006, and freedom-of-panorama in Austria does not cover non-building-artworks located inside buildings (see [4]). So, permission or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Unterranna Grablegungskapelle3.jpg
- File:Unterranna Grablegungskapelle4.jpg
- File:Unterranna Grablegungskapelle5.jpg
- File:Unterranna Kalvarienbergkapelle5.jpg
- File:Unterranna Kalvarienbergkapelle6.jpg
- File:Unterranna Kalvarienbergkapelle7.jpg
- Ausgehend von:
§ 54 Z. 5 UrhG [1936] [Es ist zulässig:] "Werke der Baukunst nach einem ausgeführten Bau oder andere Werke der bildenden Künste nach Werkstücken, die sich an einem dem öffentlichen Verkehr dienenden Orte bleibend befinden, zu vervielfältigen zu verbreiten" erachte ich die Panoramafreiheit für gegeben: die Werkstücke befinden sich an einem dem öffentlichen Verkehr dienenden Ort; die Kapellen verfügen über keine Türen (sie sind - wie auf anderen Fotos ersichtlich - mit Türgittern gesichert); der Blick von außen in die Kapellen ist für die Öffentlichkeit gegeben (und offensichtlich auch erwünscht); die Aufnahmen wurden von außen - aus dem öffentlichen Raum - gemacht. Ich nehme auch an, dass sich die Werkstücke bleibend an diesem Ort befinden. Mit vielen Grüßen - BSonne (talk) 17:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hi BSonne,
- dieser LA war Anlaß für eine Grundsatzfrage zur Österr. Panoramafreiheit[5]. --Túrelio (talk)
Deleted: Per Turelio. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:34, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Non-free sign. Incorrectly uses {{FoP-Sweden}} which only applies to works of art. This is a work of literature. Stefan4 (talk) 11:30, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- This is an interesting test case. To me, this sign primarily is a work of art. Furthermore, in my opinion, the text is of negligeable literary value, and as such, if the sign as a work of art is not protected, this very ordinary text certainly does not need to be protected by any legal copyright.
- Also; I added the same FoP template to another image of the same sign today. Hard to understand why it was arbitrarily removed there, but left intact on the file page of this image. Not equitable treatment, though I'm sincerely glad for Mr. Elgaard if he's being treated preferetially. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- There was a court ruling by the European Court of Justice found that certain texts consisting of only eleven words were copyrighted. This is a lot longer and contains someone's selection of which information to present. Clearly copyrightable. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
??? My image of this same sign, where the allegedly copyrighted text was hardly legible, was deleted several days ago. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:07, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Crown is an artwork covered by FOP-Sweden. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:37, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
In that case, please reinstate this! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 18:28, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
I probably misunderstood the Swedish (c) laws. Both files need to be retested. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:20, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
And:
File:Lillienhoff Palace sign 2010 Stockholm.jpg
- No you did not. They do not in any way address anonymous sign text of this kind, which is not any type of litetary work that needs to be copyrighted. The nominator interprets these texts with personal bias, as I see it, and I do not understand why. Does not seem constructive. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 01:05, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- Here's another example. Same nominator. Same type of non-copyright text. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 01:06, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- The text here is a mere statement of facts. Edaen (talk) 05:14, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete "anonymous" is irrelevant. Comments about the nominator are ad hominem and possibly personal attacks, but again irrelevant. "Literary work" include ... descriptive representations. This should be deleted per nom and COM:PRP. --99of9 (talk)
- "The nominator interprets these texts with personal bias, as I see it, and I do not understand why. Does not seem constructive." Those are my opinions about the motivation for this nomination. It borders on frivolous. The slur that those honest opinions of mine are "possibly personal attacks" was uncalled for and insulting and partial against me. Stick to ths subject, fairly and objectively, which in this case is a nomination made out of bias where the Swedish law is misinterpreted grossly. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:39, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- PS Those of us who read Swedish know how poorly motivated this nomination is. That, too, was not a personal attack. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:44, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- PS2: And those of us who read French know about the other one, too (linked above) from the Bernadotte Museum. Poorly motivated nomination. No personal attack. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:45, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The text is not original enough.
- Uteslutna från skydd äro, framhölls det, sådana verk vilka icke i någon mån bära prägel av ett andligt skapande utan framträda som alster av en rent mekanisk verksamhet. Så saknas regelmässigt författarrätt i fråga om priskuranter, vanliga annonser och i allmänhet formlösa meddelanden av rent faktisk art.
- Excluded from protection are, it was emphasized, such works which in no degree carry a mark of spiritual creation but appear as products of a purely mechanical process. Thus, authors' rights are regularly not applied to lists of prices, common advertisements and, generally, shapeless notices of a purely factual kind. SOU 1956:25 p. 67
Edaen (talk) 15:04, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- The problem is that it is debateable when something 'i någon mån bär[] prägel av ett andligt skapande'. Product numbers are complex enough, see [6]. On the other hand, at least some recipes are not, see NJA 1946 p. 371 (not available online, reading the text requires visiting a library, so I haven't read it). Although facts themselves are not creative, a selection of which facts to list and the wording in the presentation of the facts can be creative. You may have noticed that the Swedish text contains slightly more information than the English text, so the person who wrote the Swedish text found it interesting to include more information. Not sure if that is enough to gain copyright protection, though. COM:TOO almost exclusively deals with artworks and isn't very useful when dealing with literary works. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:15, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Copyright protects human creativity. If the threshold of originallity is levelled with the ground then copyright law will be very different. A selection of facts is not a literary work. A sufficiently long selection of facts is called a database. As a database this list is not long enough to be protected. Edaen (talk) 12:06, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep both images, as above. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:50, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment As the closing admin of the first deletion request: Stefan4 informed, that I based my decision on the the Swedish (c) law that covers databases, pricelists, catalogs, and such. Therefore I nominated both files again to make sure that we decide correctly. I'll ping our three Swedish speaking admins so we can get to the bottom of this.
- @AzaToth, Lokal Profil, and Thuresson: Help please!
--Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:23, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- Pricelists can be protected as databases. That is not an authors' right but a neighbouring right. Edaen (talk) 17:29, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Lists of product numbers meet the threshold of originality, see NJA 1995 p. 256. Price lists and product numbers have about the same level of complexity in my opinion. Price lists and product number databases are additionally protected as databases, of course. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:15, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Not generally. If the structure of the database is original enough, it may be considered a literary work and be protected by copyright as such. This does not apply to structured lists of facts where the structure is commonplace. Edaen (talk) 12:06, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Lists of product numbers meet the threshold of originality, see NJA 1995 p. 256. Price lists and product numbers have about the same level of complexity in my opinion. Price lists and product number databases are additionally protected as databases, of course. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:15, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Pricelists can be protected as databases. That is not an authors' right but a neighbouring right. Edaen (talk) 17:29, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Simpel text, short info for turists, not original enough.--Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 14:49, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: In general information boards, maps etc. are considered to be works of literature and as such are not covered by the FoP exemption. As for how many words it takes to make an original text or whether facts expressed as prose are still just facts that seems like a slippery slope to go down. After all we claim copyright on all Wikipedia articles independent of length and they are supposed to all be facts. I would recommend delete. /Lokal_Profil 09:09, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- You can't reasonably mean that the principle of precaution should be used to lower the threshold of originality to the ground. I'm not quite sure whether you actually mean that individual datapoints should be considered protected on Commons but that's how i read you. I don't see you draw a line between what can be copyrighted and what is pure information. Edaen (talk) 09:52, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Comment: I think it has been clarified now that there is nothing special about Swedish law with respect to these information texts. It is a matter of originality and any admin could apply Commons' normal rules. Edaen (talk) 12:45, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep as per Edaen. It is very reasonable to believe that if different people independent of each other wrote three sentences with the bare facts about the history of the building, they would find themselves having written identical texts. Hence the text is not original and not protected by copyright. Thuresson (talk) 22:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: The text is very short, presenting a small number of facts in plain turns of phrase. It is likely that most anyone would write this text the same way if presented with the facts and the task to write an introductory sign. Therefore I cannot find that this text would satisfy the threshold of originality for, and be a literary work enjoying protection of, the Swedish copyright law. --Pitke (talk) 16:27, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
No FOP on france, design of entrace is Post 1945. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:52, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep For me the entrance in background is COM:DM De Minimis. The main subject of the picture is the crowd. Jeriby (talk) 14:50, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete If the backsides of a crowd are really the main subject, I'd say it is out of scope, but I agree with the nominator that the archway is a key element of the photo. --99of9 (talk) 05:34, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No DM, entrance could have been avoided. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:38, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
FoP Concern , Advert is a copyright artwork ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:10, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: I can literally present a gallery of such advertisements (below). Mind that nearly every commercial aircraft has a copyrighted logo and design on them so by the rationale mentioned here we ought to delete images of every commercial aircraft such as practically everything in Category:EasyJet, Category:Flybe, Category:American Airlines to name a few. We have a history of keeping such content, how is this different from Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Ana.b747.pokemon.arp.750pix.jpg (2008), Commons:Deletion requests/Image:JR ED79 Kaikyo at Aomori Station.jpg (2008), Commons:Deletion requests/File:ANA Boeing 747-400 yellow 060318 haneda.jpg (2015)? -- とある白い猫 ちぃ？ 10:01, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The actual subject of the photo is EC-IXE, a Boeing 737-800 for Air Europa. The advertisement on the aircraft makes up but a small part of the overall motif in the photo, thereby it is de minimis. N510AG (talk) 14:44, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Same as: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Ana.b747.pokemon.arp.750pix.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Image:JR ED79 Kaikyo at Aomori Station.jpg Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:41, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
FoP Concern , Advert is a copyright artwork ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:11, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: I can literally present a gallery of such advertisements (below). Mind that nearly every commercial aircraft has a copyrighted logo and design on them so by the rationale mentioned here we ought to delete images of every commercial aircraft such as practically everything in Category:EasyJet, Category:Flybe, Category:American Airlines to name a few. We have a history of keeping such content, how is this different from Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Ana.b747.pokemon.arp.750pix.jpg (2008), Commons:Deletion requests/Image:JR ED79 Kaikyo at Aomori Station.jpg (2008), Commons:Deletion requests/File:ANA Boeing 747-400 yellow 060318 haneda.jpg (2015)? -- とある白い猫 ちぃ？ 10:00, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Same as: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Ana.b747.pokemon.arp.750pix.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Image:JR ED79 Kaikyo at Aomori Station.jpg Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:42, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy where this image appears to have been taken, Advert is a commerical artwork. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: I can literally present a gallery of such advertisements (below). Mind that nearly every commercial aircraft has a copyrighted logo and design on them so by the rationale mentioned here we ought to delete images of every commercial aircraft such as practically everything in Category:EasyJet, Category:Flybe, Category:American Airlines to name a few. We have a history of keeping such content, how is this different from Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Ana.b747.pokemon.arp.750pix.jpg (2008), Commons:Deletion requests/Image:JR ED79 Kaikyo at Aomori Station.jpg (2008), Commons:Deletion requests/File:ANA Boeing 747-400 yellow 060318 haneda.jpg (2015)? -- とある白い猫 ちぃ？ 10:01, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The actual subject of the photo is EC-IXE, a Boeing 737-800 for Air Europa. The advertisement on the aircraft makes up but a small part of the overall motif in the photo, thereby it is de minimis. N510AG (talk) 14:44, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Same as: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Ana.b747.pokemon.arp.750pix.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Image:JR ED79 Kaikyo at Aomori Station.jpg Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:43, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy where this image was seemingly taken, Advert is a commerical artwork. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: I can literally present a gallery of such advertisements (below). Mind that nearly every commercial aircraft has a copyrighted logo and design on them so by the rationale mentioned here we ought to delete images of every commercial aircraft such as practically everything in Category:EasyJet, Category:Flybe, Category:American Airlines to name a few. We have a history of keeping such content, how is this different from Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Ana.b747.pokemon.arp.750pix.jpg (2008), Commons:Deletion requests/Image:JR ED79 Kaikyo at Aomori Station.jpg (2008), Commons:Deletion requests/File:ANA Boeing 747-400 yellow 060318 haneda.jpg (2015)? -- とある白い猫 ちぃ？ 10:01, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Same as: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Ana.b747.pokemon.arp.750pix.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Image:JR ED79 Kaikyo at Aomori Station.jpg Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:43, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutal work post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:18, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment If deleted please don't forget to upload this picture on the French Wikipedia. Thank you in advance. Jeriby (talk) 14:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete clear IMO. @Jeriby: please go ahead and upload to fr-wiki if you wish, I will then delete here. --99of9 (talk) 05:40, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in France Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:44, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutal work post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:18, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment If deleted please don't forget to upload this picture on the French Wikipedia. Thank you in advance. Jeriby (talk) 14:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in France Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:44, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutal work post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Doubt we reach the threshold of originality in this classic train station hall. Jeriby (talk) 14:24, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Below TOO Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:46, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutal work post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:20, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment If deleted please don't forget to upload this picture on the French Wikipedia. Thank you in advance. Jeriby (talk) 14:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in France Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:46, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutal work post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment If deleted please don't forget to upload this picture on the French Wikipedia. Thank you in advance. Jeriby (talk) 14:43, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in France Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:46, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Architecutal work post 1945, in France, No FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Not sure it reaches the threshold of originality there. Jeriby (talk) 14:41, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Below TOO Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:46, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
This was isted for speedy by User:Dennis Bratland because http://www.ktmimages.com/image/view/21169 claims the photo is "Royalty free images for editorial use only. No commercial use allowed. In 2007 when I uploaded the image the license was: Using images of this data base for media purpose is copyright-free when mentioning the photographer. Please find that name in the image description. Publishing any foto without mentioning the photographer will result in a breach of copyright and there may be additional claims through the photographer. I asked about it at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Copyrights/Can_I_use.../Archive_3#KTM_Images Chris Ssk (talk) 16:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, that's very likely true. It's too bad there's no record of it at the Wayback machine. All I can say is that these types of commercial PR photos should be avoided for just this kind of hassle. Companies offer them with one license, realize they don't like it, and just change it without acknowledging what they've done, or keeping a record of the original license terms. Personally I think this type of slick studio photo is unencyclopedic: used in a Wikipedia article it looks like an advertisement, compared to the more natural photography found on most articles. So I don't think we should bend over backwards to try to keep this type of photo around. But technically we can, because KTM apparently licensed it that way back in 2007. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:51, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Com:Evidence of PD w/ attribution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Copyrights/Can_I_use.../Archive_3#KTM_Images Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:49, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine - sculpture by uk:Садовський Йосип Антонович who died in 2008 INeverCry 22:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:53, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine - 2013 monument INeverCry 23:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No FoP in Ukraine Avi (talk) 17:47, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:07, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine - 2013 monument INeverCry 23:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No FoP in Ukraine Avi (talk) 17:48, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:08, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ivan Pidkova Monument in Lviv
[edit]No FoP in Ukraine - 1982 monument [7]
INeverCry 22:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: and transferred to ruwiki. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:10, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine - modern bust of Vasily Glushko who died in 1998 INeverCry 22:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: and transferred to ruwiki. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:13, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine - 2000 monument INeverCry 22:46, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: and transferred to ruwiki. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:22, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine - 2009 bust INeverCry 22:48, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: and transferred to ruwiki. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:30, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine - 1981 monument INeverCry 22:50, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: and transferred to uk- and ruwiki. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:46, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine - 2006 bust INeverCry 23:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: dup anyway Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:56, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Busts in Lviv Oblast
[edit]No FoP in Ukraine - 2010 monument
INeverCry 23:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: and transferred to ukwiki Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:03, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statues in Lviv
[edit]No FoP in Ukraine - 2006 monument
INeverCry 05:55, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 09:16, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statues in Lviv
[edit]No FoP in Ukraine - 1999 monument
- File:Львів, пам. «Охоронцям української державності».jpg
- File:Пам'ятник загиблим співробітникам МВС, Львів.JPG
- File:Пам'ятник працівникам МВС.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник у Львові.jpg
- File:Правоохоронцям України, які загинули під час виконання службових обов`язків, Львів.JPG
INeverCry 23:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: and some transferred to ukwiki. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:13, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rarotonga2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos seem to be a collection from websites or local sources (workplace, see userpage). I strongly doubt that all this photo are CC and that the uploader has permission to upload to commons. We need OTRS permission for all uploads.
File:MIGNON MOD.2 ROT.JPG
Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Curta Typ 1a.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:DARLING.JPG Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Crandall.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Vitrine zur Käserei Wila.JPG Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Drechselbank.JPG Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Ortsmuseum Wila.JPG Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Tösstaler Frauentracht.JPG Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Ortsmuseum Hinwil.jpeg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Ortsmuseum Hinwil 14.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Ortsmuseum Hinwil 10, 1446.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Ortsmuseum Hinwil 10, Bild 1444.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Ortsmuseum Hinwil 11.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Ortsmuseum Hinwil 10.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Ortsmuseum Hinwil 09.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Ortsmuseum Hinwil 08.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Ortsmuseum Hinwil 07.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Ortsmuseum Hinwil 06.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Ortsmuseum Hinwil 04.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Ortsmuseum Hinwil 05.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Ortsmuseum Hinwil 02.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Ortsmuseum Hinwil 03, Bild 1382.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Ortsmuseum Hinwil 01.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Fadenlager.JPG Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Stickereien entstehen.JPG Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Stickerei.JPG Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Faden und Stickerei.JPG Done OTRS Permission received- File:Sichtbogen und Storchenschnabel vor Stickmuster..JPG
File:Handmaschinenstickerin.JPG Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Naehmaschinenmuseum0wd.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Naehmaschinenmuseum0wa.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Naehmaschinenmuseum0wc.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Naehmaschinenmuseum0wb.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Museum Stefan Stähli 001.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Museum Stefan Stähli 004.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Museum Stefan Stähli 006.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Museum Stefan Stähli 007.jpg Done OTRS Permission received- File:Ebook.jpg
- File:Stiefelhaus.jpg
- File:Breitlandenberg mit Turbenthal und Wila.jpg
- File:Kaffeewaermer aus dem Nachlass von Olga Meyer.jpg
- File:Hanoggeli eine Figur in einem Olga Meyer Roman.jpg
- File:Halskettenanhaenger von Olga Meyer.jpg
File:Archiv für Ortsgeschichte Greifensee.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Ortsmuseum Alte Kanzlei Fischenthal.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Museum Wetzikon Windellade.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Museum Wetzikon Vitrine Licht.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Museum Wetzikon Hütte.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Museum Wetzikon Vitrine Feuer.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Museum Wetzikon.jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Aelteste Urkunde im Stadtarchiv Uster (1371).jpg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Paul Klaeui Bibliothek Uster.jpg Done OTRS Permission received- File:Baumwolle für die Bleiche Wald.ogg
File:Textilfunde von Robenhausen.ogg Done OTRS Permission receivedFile:Camping am South Lefroy Bay, Westaustralien.jpgkept per OTRS permission. --Krd 08:54, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Hedwig in Washington, can you please explain me what is wrong with these images? I think there should be no problem with all uploaded files. Maybe I'm wrong. --BlueBreezeWiki (talk) 07:38, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Sure can do. As I stated above: Collection of photographs, made with different cameras. It seems to me that the uploader has no permission to release the photographs with a CC license. I surely hope we can resolve the issue without having to delete all/any. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:44, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Hedwig in Washington, Hello BlueBreezeWiki, I have permission from all authors to publish their pictures and interviews. They will all reply in the necessary form within the next few days. Do I need this kind of official permission for all pictures I intend to upload in the future? I can't see that this is a standard procedure in other articles in wikipedia. Rarotonga2 (talk) 08:17, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- I just processed permission via OTRS for three of the images, marked above.--Sphilbrick (talk) 12:58, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- 4 more done w/ OTRS. Keep DR open for 2 weeks. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:47, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
- Permission has been received for most of these images, so I think there is no harm in keeping this open a further week to enable the last few to be covered. BlueBreezeWiki, please review the remaining ones and if necessary gently prod the copyright holders in case they've overlooked the matter. In answer to your earlier question, you need to arrange OTRS permission for any work by someone else that does not have an explicit license online somewhere. If there is a license online, please use our license review facility. Cheers. Green Giant (talk) 12:41, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- 4 more done w/ OTRS. Keep DR open for 2 weeks. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:47, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
- I just processed permission via OTRS for three of the images, marked above.--Sphilbrick (talk) 12:58, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Hedwig in Washington, Hello BlueBreezeWiki, I have permission from all authors to publish their pictures and interviews. They will all reply in the necessary form within the next few days. Do I need this kind of official permission for all pictures I intend to upload in the future? I can't see that this is a standard procedure in other articles in wikipedia. Rarotonga2 (talk) 08:17, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- Sure can do. As I stated above: Collection of photographs, made with different cameras. It seems to me that the uploader has no permission to release the photographs with a CC license. I surely hope we can resolve the issue without having to delete all/any. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:44, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Wow! There's a bunch of OTRS coming in! Excellent work, Rarotonga2, thank you very much!!
--Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:58, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Many files now have OTRS permission. Deleting the rest. Pitke (talk) 15:48, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Depicted statue obviously recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works in the U.S. So, permission or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I plan on calling the museum tomorrow to see if they will grant permission. Please stand by (and thanks!)..... Hanyou23 (talk) 02:12, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- Left a message at the museum today... hopefully the person will listen to it soon and hopefully not on vacation. Hanyou23 (talk) 21:50, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hanyou23, you need to get permission from the sculptor, not the museum. Green Giant (talk) 09:22, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, I know... the artist is embroiled in all kinds of various legal cases right now (can't find any contact information for him), so it was suggested to me by an experienced editor to check with the museum, to see if all rights were transferred to the museum at the time of purchase/installation. I suppose it's worth a try, or to see if they can get me in touch with the artist through a backdoor channel. My options are really limited here... hopefully I hear back from the museum today (fingers crossed). Thank you much for pointing that out !
- Yeah, I know... the artist is embroiled in all kinds of various legal cases right now (can't find any contact information for him), so it was suggested to me by an experienced editor to check with the museum, to see if all rights were transferred to the museum at the time of purchase/installation. I suppose it's worth a try, or to see if they can get me in touch with the artist through a backdoor channel. My options are really limited here... hopefully I hear back from the museum today (fingers crossed). Thank you much for pointing that out
- Hanyou23, you need to get permission from the sculptor, not the museum. Green Giant (talk) 09:22, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- Left a message at the museum today... hopefully the person will listen to it soon and hopefully not on vacation. Hanyou23 (talk) 21:50, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
The museum left a message for me today and they would like to see the photo before granting approval. Assuming the University has tomorrow off, it'll probably be Monday at the earliest before I hear back from them... but then again, they may work tomorrow, so... will keep here updated. Thanks! Hanyou23 (talk) 22:00, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, I have initial approval to use the photo... OTRS email is being sent to the museum - please do not add the OTRS template at this time. Thank you! Hanyou23 (talk) 20:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep open another week. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:30, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
- Will call the contact at the museum on Monday... I got Wikibonked (along with real life heh~) and am playing catch-up, sorry..... Hanyou23 (talk) 04:08, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hanyou23, any updates? Did they get back to you? I'm happy to keep this open another week if it helps. Green Giant (talk) 18:49, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Will call the contact at the museum on Monday... I got Wikibonked (along with real life heh~) and am playing catch-up, sorry..... Hanyou23 (talk) 04:08, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep open another week. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:30, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission. Please open undeletion request if OTRS permission received. Pitke (talk) 15:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Depicted statue likely recent and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works in the U.S. So, permission or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Statue was carved in 1935 by Louis Slobodkin, casted in 2000; no copyright notice that I know of. Thank you! Hanyou23 (talk) 12:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- See this link for further information. Gmcbjames (talk) 19:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Probable right holders contacted... please give a week to hear back before deleting. Hanyou23 (talk) 01:34, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- I will be contacting the museum that most likely owns the rights tomorrow by phone to get permission. Please give a few more days... thanks for your patience! Hanyou23 (talk) 19:30, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- Probable right holders contacted... please give a week to hear back before deleting. Hanyou23 (talk) 01:34, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- See this link for further information. Gmcbjames (talk) 19:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Have contacted the museum and filled out a form - they are going through a image use request process at this time... will hear back soon. Not too hopeful on getting permission granted, but we'll see. Hanyou23 (talk) 21:48, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- Permission has been granted by the museum (yay!)! Will be sending the OTRS form later this afternoon... please to not put the OTRS template up at this time. Thank you! Hanyou23 (talk) 19:01, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- After getting approval from the museum, I haven't heard back from them regarding the OTRS email... hope that didn't scare them off. Will call the contact at the museum tomorrow and if they have tomorrow off (July 4th holiday weekend), then Monday would be the next day. Thanks again for your patience! Hanyou23 (talk) 22:03, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
- Update - called the museum today... the director of operations have forwarded the OTRS email to the registrar... she said that it may take a week to two to get everything worked on but she said that the registrar was planning on working on it today and if there were any problems, they would let me know. So... patience (on my part heh), I guess~.....
- Keep open another week. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hanyou23, any progress to report? Happy to keep this open another week at most if it helps with permission. Green Giant (talk) 18:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- After getting approval from the museum, I haven't heard back from them regarding the OTRS email... hope that didn't scare them off. Will call the contact at the museum tomorrow and if they have tomorrow off (July 4th holiday weekend), then Monday would be the next day. Thanks again for your patience! Hanyou23 (talk) 22:03, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission. Please open undeletion request if OTRS permission received. Pitke (talk) 15:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
June 24
[edit]Disnyeland Paris FoP concern images
[edit]Because of the volume of the DR's involved a number of these have been moved to a subpage at Commons:Deletion requests/2015/06/24/Disneyland Paris FOP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:54, 25 June 2015 (UTC) --- Done on subpage --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:07, 7 July 2015 (UTC)