Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/05/26
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
Must be realistically useful for an education purpose. Personal photo not in use by any projects. Out of scope. MJ94 (talk) 06:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photo shizhao (talk) 09:23, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (cropped & photoshopped) resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 20:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Tagged with copyvio (cropped) via https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=110777718996347&set=a.109134005827385.15580.100001923593847&type=3&theater (10.02.2011, 01:02). Gunnex (talk) 20:10, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedily deleted. Green Giant (talk) 21:26, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
No license info in source. Cap1000 (talk) 14:02, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: just a copyright violation. JuTa 19:48, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
No license info in source. Cap1000 (talk) 14:02, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: just a copyright violation. JuTa 19:48, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
inutile vers cat qui ne marche pas KAPour les intimes 06:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
redirection inutile et casser KAPour les intimes 06:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Je suis désolé. Je n'ai pas mis le bon titre, qui est "Place Cornavin - vue aérienne". Comme je ne peux pas changer le nom du fichier, j'aimerais pouvoir recommencer de zéro. Villaf36 (talk) 13:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC) Bonjour, Toutes mes excuses, j'ai fini par m'apercevoir de l'existence de l'option de renommage de fichier. Je vous présente mes excuses, je suis novice sur Wikimedia Commons. Cordialement, Villaf36
Kept: File renamed. Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:11, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Je suis désolé. Je n'ai pas mis le bon titre, qui est "Centre oecuménique des Eglises - vue aérienne". Comme je ne peux pas changer le nom du fichier, j'aimerais pouvoir recommencer de zéro. Villaf36 (talk) 13:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: File renamed. Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. Image from http://caucatalog.narod.ru/base/karakaya_skalistaya_mnt.html (direct link: http://caubasephotos2.narod.ru/photos/cau_10752_pc.jpg) Copyright info in source: Photo provided by Pavel Chochia. So this is not free image Cap1000 (talk) 16:41, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. Image from http://caucatalog.narod.ru/base/soukhauzkaya_mnt.html (direct link: http://caubasephotos2.narod.ru/photos2/cau_11676_aa.jpg) Copyright info in source: Photo provided by Armen Arjutjunjan. So this is not free image Cap1000 (talk) 16:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. Image taken from http://mg5642.livejournal.com/25781.html (direct link: http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/mg5642/66429722/495973/495973_1000.jpg) Not free image, (c) in source Cap1000 (talk) 16:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, and the uploader's history. The uploader has claimed to be the author and copyright holder of photos taken with at least nine different cameras (in addition to the ones listed below: Canon PowerShot A650 IS, Canon PowerShot S5 IS, Fujifilm FinePix S5600, Fujifilm FinePix S9600, Nikon D80, Nikon D90).
- File:Массив Метеген 3154м (Мехтыген) с юга..jpg – taken with a Nokia 5530 phone on 2013-06-13
- File:Скалистый хребет, вид с севера..jpg – no metadata. Supposedly created the same day it was uploaded, but a different crop of the same photo appears in this post four days earlier.
- File:Скалистый хребет с севера.jpg – same as above
- File:Массив Суган.jpg – taken with a Nokia Lumia 925 phone on 2015-01-11
- File:Суганский хребет вид с севера.JPG – taken with a Panasonic DMC-FS4 point-and-shoot camera on 2014-06-27
- File:Гюльчи-тау.jpg – no metadata. The full resolution version at http://www.panoramio.com/photo/108656460 (which is marked © All Rights Reserved but uploaded by a user with a name similar to the Commons uploader's username) indicates that it was taken with a Panasonic DMC-FS4.
—LX (talk, contribs) 18:51, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
uploaded by a copyvio guy. most likely this is copyvio Saqib (talk) 13:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User.Green Giant. JuTa 04:01, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
User request. Bhai-istan (talk) 14:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:INeverCry. JuTa 04:00, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
User request. Bhai-istan (talk) 14:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:INeverCry. JuTa 04:00, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
User request Bhai-istan (talk) 14:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:INeverCry. JuTa 03:59, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
User request. Bhai-istan (talk) 14:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:INeverCry. JuTa 03:59, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete Permission ist vorhanden Nixnubix (talk) 18:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:INeverCry. JuTa 03:58, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete Permission ist vorhanden Nixnubix (talk) 18:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:INeverCry. JuTa 03:58, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status and unlikely own work, considering previously published via (even cropped) http://www.bitacoradigital.com.mx/2011/09/12/este-martes-el-1er-informe-de-arnoldo-rodriguez-en-el-teatro-calderon/ (2011, Copyright © 2015 — Bitácora Digital. Todos los derechos reservados.) = http://www.bitacoradigital.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/ARR2.jpg (identical exif) Gunnex (talk) 22:44, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Is this a scan of someone else's document or something? Poor quality (so seems to be out of scope) and dubious copyright status. Stefan4 (talk) 16:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
This offer doesn't seem to be realisically useful for an educational purpose. Stefan4 (talk) 16:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Keep We have 176 images in category:price tags, and 65 of them are used in Wikimedia projects (check) - and some of the used images don't show anything else than the price tag. Obviously such images have a potential educative use.--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:09, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 00:14, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, copy here. Yann (talk) 17:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, copy here. Yann (talk) 17:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio. Fry1989 eh? 17:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Dude, its not violating any copyrights, it has been licensed under CC 2.0 in my Flickr Account. I have created this image. It is my own work. Here is the link to the original picture on my Flickr Account.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/129292414@N06/18110977105/in/datetaken/
- Dude, the Manchester United logo is copyrighted, in any form. Fry1989 eh? 03:20, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
The photo was made not by the author Leha-11 (talk) 17:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
The photo was made not by the author Leha-11 (talk) 17:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
The photo was made not by the author Leha-11 (talk) 17:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mowenau as Fair use (Non-free) and the most recent rationale was: logo|event logos Bellow the COM:TOO? Amitie 10g (talk) 18:02, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No notability Ziad (talk) 18:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Not ok for PD-Text/Logo Aga (d) 19:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution (photoshopped & cropped), missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 19:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution (photoshopped & cropped), missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:EpigmenioRC / logs Gunnex (talk) 19:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Although the names are similar -- a relative,perhaps? -- the uploader is not the artist so policy requires a free license sent to OTRS by the artist or his heirs. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:34, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
possible copyviol: gmaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 21:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Obvious copyvio of [1].--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Possible copyviol: gmaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 21:19, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Obvious copyvio of [2].--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No indication that the uploader is the copyright holder. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:11, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF.
- File:Alejandro castro mexiquense.jpg
- File:Angelina-carreño-edo-mex-pri-diputada.jpg
- File:Angelina-carreño-mijares-estado-mexico.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 22:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, all other uploads deleted as copyvios, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 22:25, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Deliver~commonswiki / logs Gunnex (talk) 22:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 22:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 22:34, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nicholasfelix (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images
- File:Nicholas Felix Performing Hair.jpg
- File:NF performing in LA.jpg
- File:Live From the Jungle (Promotional Tour Poster).jpg
- File:Live From the Jungle (Promotional Poster).jpg
INeverCry 00:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope.
- File:Dylan Raffin -.jpg
- File:Dylan Raffin - Tournage.jpg
- File:Dylan Raffin - Interview Radio.jpg
- File:Dylan Raffin - Promotion.jpg
FDMS 4 00:03, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Je ne vois aucun problème sur les photos concernant "Dylan Raffin". Aucun problème de droit d'auteur, rien.
Deleted: per nom. Dylan Raffin doesn't seem to be a notable person. INeverCry 00:28, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Taken without permission from this site Xochiztli (talk) 01:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Dubious claim of authorship, poor recent history re copyvio uploads Andy Dingley (talk) 02:12, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:21, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
While the exact date of this status is not clear, unfortunately COM:FOP#Japan does not allow commercial reproduction of outdoor works of art such as statues. DAJF (talk) 02:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Note the date on the inscription next to the statue: 平成八年十一月九日 (9 November 1996, second last row). --Stefan4 (talk) 14:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:21, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
non free picrure, no free license given on page from where the photo is taken Yger (talk) 03:12, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Template:Reply to Yger Yger Hi Yger Please check the page for the image again: http://www.imdb.com/media/rm294647808/nm4528758?ref_=nm_phs_md_5 Quoting: "Photo by Free for Public by Linnea Larsdotter - Free to use for all media - © Free for Public by Linnea Larsdotter - Free to use for all media and articles and publications/press" [1] Thanks for helping.
The picure is free of use: Quoting: "Photo by Free for Public by Linnea Larsdotter - Free to use for all media - © Free for Public by Linnea Larsdotter - Free to use for all media and articles and publications/press" [2]
- ther is no refernece to a free licnse. Free to use is not the same as a free image. And just using the copyright symbol signal it is unfree.Yger (talk) 08:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a copyright violation; readily accessible via a Google search EricEnfermero (talk) 04:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
marked as "own work" but taken 108 years ago EricEnfermero (talk) 04:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
unlikely to be "own work" EricEnfermero (talk) 04:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be same image as this "all rights reserved" photo on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/almotasim/4928148228/ Ytoyoda (talk) 04:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
as there is no information about the places, the utility is too limited, so out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 04:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alex1971mx~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status. Previously published at Panoramio under "all rights reserved by alex1971mx" via:
- File:Yautepec zocalo.jpg (08.2010) versus http://www.panoramio.com/photo/31641171 (01.2010)
- File:Amadorsalazar.jpg (10.2009) versus http://www.panoramio.com/photo/11703820 (07.2008)
Despite of having a similar username, the Panoramio user is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user. A verifiable connection via COM:OTRS (or by other means) must be established.
Gunnex (talk) 06:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:21, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Licensed at the source as "All Rights Reserved", which is not a free license. https://www.flickr.com/photos/oyat/1350189994/ McZusatz (talk) 10:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Question and Delete That link goes to flickrphoto:1350189994 but the file has an obvious Flickr file name, suggesting that the file comes from flickrphoto:403719786. What is this supposed to mean? #403719786 is clearly a completely different picture. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:22, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
ununsed personal picture, out of prject scope, see description Motopark (talk) 12:10, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:22, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:22, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused, poorly named and described may suggest not own work TherasTaneel (talk) 01:32, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination --Krd 10:04, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bosnia and Herzegovina: 2012 monument (work by Adis Lukač). Eleassar (t/p) 12:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:22, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:22, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:23, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused private individual's photo. Outside of project scope. Commons is not Facebook. DAJF (talk) 13:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:23, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused private photo. Outside the scope of this project. More suited to Facebook. DAJF (talk) 13:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:23, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:24, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:Defence Vehicles Manufacturer.pdf
- File:Special Security Vehicle, Special Protection Vehicle.pdf
- File:Border Protection Vehicle Manufacturers.pdf
- File:Light Combat Vehicles Manufacturers, Dealers and Traders.pdf
- File:Armoured CIT vehicle, Armored CIT Truck, CIT Van.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 00:24, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Harian Radar Riau (talk · contribs)
[edit]Newspaper. No evidence of permission.
- File:Facebook-20150525-231900.png
- File:Facebook-20150512-233915.png
- File:Cover Radar Duri Region Senin 25-5-2015.pdf
- File:Facebook-20150520-231323.png
- File:Facebook-20150520-231323 edit.png
- File:Facebook-20150521-235437.png
- File:Radar Riau.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be in SVG. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
What new could be added to collection of explicit images? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by David Johnson 9 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Cathedral of Saints Peter and Paul Faisalabad Pakistan 02.JPG
- File:Cathedral of Saints Peter and Paul Faisalabad Pakistan 01.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Too small to discern what is shown on the image Takeaway (talk) 15:29, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Copyright holderː Roberto Duran, see also http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Bodypainting_and_temporary_tattoo_art_%289506398353%29.jpg 91.65.48.77 15:31, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
probably not "own work"; copied from the internet; of unknown copyright status. Takeaway (talk) 15:36, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
probably not own work; copied from the internet; of unknown copyright status. Takeaway (talk) 15:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
probably not own work; copied from the internet; of unknown copyright status. Takeaway (talk) 15:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
probably not own work; copied from the internet; of unknown copyright status. Takeaway (talk) 15:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Probably not "own work"; copied from the internet; of unknown copyright status. Takeaway (talk) 15:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Probably not "own work" and copied from the internet; of unknown copyright status. Takeaway (talk) 15:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Probably not "own work" and copied from the internet; of unknown copyright status. Takeaway (talk) 15:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Probably not "own work" and copied from the internet; of unknown copyright status. Takeaway (talk) 15:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Probably not "own work" and copied from the internet; of unknown copyright status. Takeaway (talk) 15:44, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Not "own work" by uploader. Original is https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iglesia_Real_del_Monte,_Hgo..JPG Takeaway (talk) 15:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
nice photo, but does not seem to be free Pibwl (talk) 15:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
It is highly probable that this is not "own work" by the uploader as all their other uploads were copies of images found on the internet. Takeaway (talk) 15:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Highly probable that this is not "own work" as this image seems to have been copied from the internet. Takeaway (talk) 15:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused, and it is unclear what the picture is meant to show. Stefan4 (talk) 16:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Walterandre (talk · contribs)
[edit]One picture appears to be a copyvio from here. The other three are very small and with no EXIF, and the strange file names ('Screen Shot') suggest that the files might be screenshots of someone else's photograph.
- File:Screen Shot 2015-04-07 at 5.13.17 PM.png
- File:Screen Shot 2015-04-07 at 5.11.47 PM.png
- File:Lars Grael.png
- File:Premiação Campeonato Brasileiro de Star 2015.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 16:24, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
COM:DW, i presume all are scanned from the original. If yes then uploader has no right to release these works under CC license. If some of them are in public domain then license tag should be fixed according to the needs. Otherwise, we need to be sure via COM:OTRS.
- File:Rajasthan-27.jpg
- File:Rajasthan-25.jpg
- File:Rajasthan-22.jpg
- File:Rajasthan-21.jpg
- File:Jodhpur-inside fort 05.jpg
- File:Jodhpur-inside fort 01.jpg
- File:Jodhpur-inside fort 02.jpg
- File:JK Seal-19C.jpg
- File:JK Seal-18C.jpg
- File:JK Seal-17C.jpg
- File:JK Seal-15C.jpg
- File:JK Seal-16C.jpg
- File:JK Seal-14C.jpg
- File:JK Seal-13C.jpg
- File:JK Seal-10C.jpg
- File:JK Seal-12C.jpg
- File:JK Seal-11C.jpg
- File:JK Seal-16F.jpg
~ Nahid Talk 14:42, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Dear Nahid, Following images are from our personal family album and I have the copyright for all of them. Our family is having no objection for keeping them in wikimedia commons.
File:JK Seal-19C.jpg File:JK Seal-18C.jpg File:JK Seal-17C.jpg File:JK Seal-15C.jpg File:JK Seal-16C.jpg File:JK Seal-14C.jpg File:JK Seal-13C.jpg File:JK Seal-10C.jpg File:JK Seal-12C.jpg File:JK Seal-11C.jpg File:JK Seal-16F.jpg Thank you, Schwiki (talk) 18:43, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Nasid, The book you said comes from his family album. The uploader is comes JK Seal's family. Schwiki one of the key volunteer of our kolkata community. The said book was written and published after his death by his family.Jayantanth (talk) 18:35, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Dear Nahid, Following images are taken by me only in Meherangarh fort,Jodhpur,Rajasthan. From very close observation, one can find the reflection of the photographer, opposite window, etc. in all of the images. File:Jodhpur-inside fort 05.jpg File:Jodhpur-inside fort 01.jpg File:Jodhpur-inside fort 02.jpg Thanks, Schwiki (talk) 19:41, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: I saw derivatives, professional looking photo's, some family photo's. The copyrightstatus on those images is unclear so we definatly need confirmation via OTRS especially when it is not likely that the copyright of all the photographs belongs to the uploader. Natuur12 (talk) 16:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Must be realistically useful for an education purpose. Personal photo not in use by any projects. Out of scope. Would need to be renamed to be useful.
- File:Toledo9 (17937754452).jpg
- File:Toledo8 (17941478181).jpg
- File:Toledo15 (17753022568).jpg
- File:Toledo29 (17320487513).jpg
- File:Toledo28 (17318405024).jpg
- File:Madrid42 (17887002905).jpg
MJ94 (talk) 07:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:31, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oscar Chavez77 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering also User talk:Oscar Chavez77
- File:Enrique Alfaro, segundo informe de gobierno.jpg
- File:FOTOWIKI.JPG
- File:MIGUEL ALFARO ARANGUREN.JPG
- File:Carlos Alberto Briseño.jpg --> tagged with copyvio (cropped) via https://www.facebook.com/carlosabriseno/photos/a.118041968310767.21474.110708789044085/118042134977417/?type=1&theater (11.2011)
- File:Briseño.jpg --> tagged with copyvio via https://www.facebook.com/carlosabriseno/photos/a.118186008296363.21542.110708789044085/118186108296353/?type=1&theater (11.2011)
- File:Ismael del Toro.jpg
- File:Enrique Alfaro.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 07:29, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
unknown members of the photographer's family 91.65.48.77 07:32, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No information about the death year of the photographer of this relief (photographs of 3D objects are copyrighted). Eleassar (t/p) 08:28, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 98.234.97.60 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: image belongs to Robert Campbell. Not in Public domain
- Three differently sized versions of this image were uploaded by User:Ajwaldrop to en wiki in 2007, two tagged as PD and one as GFDL. These were the only contributions of this user. I couldn't find an earlier existence of this or a similar photo. So we need proof the claimed author is the real author. --Denniss (talk) 10:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Considering http://www.robertcampbellphotography.com/maritime.html (© by "Robert Campbell") = http://www.robertcampbellphotography.com/Images/Maritime/MOL-Prestige-173.jpg (and similar shots available on that page + related stuff available at robertcampbellphotography.com and other results from Google) I would confirm 98.234.97.60 findings. Permission needed. "Robert Campbell" is an aerial photographer based in Sonoma, California and the photo was taken in the San Francisco Bay... Gunnex (talk) 19:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Incredibly hard to spot something in this small image, they do seem similar but are not the same (judging from some waves and clouds, the missing traces of the small watercraft may have been edited out). Shouldn't be hard for the claimed photographer to send a high res version to OTRS for comparison purposes to confirm/deny a copyvio.--Denniss (talk) 21:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- After seeing Gunnex's find, copyright violation seems to me now likely. Taivo (talk) 07:30, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Incredibly hard to spot something in this small image, they do seem similar but are not the same (judging from some waves and clouds, the missing traces of the small watercraft may have been edited out). Shouldn't be hard for the claimed photographer to send a high res version to OTRS for comparison purposes to confirm/deny a copyvio.--Denniss (talk) 21:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Considering http://www.robertcampbellphotography.com/maritime.html (© by "Robert Campbell") = http://www.robertcampbellphotography.com/Images/Maritime/MOL-Prestige-173.jpg (and similar shots available on that page + related stuff available at robertcampbellphotography.com and other results from Google) I would confirm 98.234.97.60 findings. Permission needed. "Robert Campbell" is an aerial photographer based in Sonoma, California and the photo was taken in the San Francisco Bay... Gunnex (talk) 19:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Nativity scenes of Slovenia
[edit]Copyrighted models (cribs). No evidence that they would be free per COM:Copyright rules by territory#Slovenia.
- File:Jaslice v Domžalah (2).jpg
- File:Jaslice-trzic1.JPG
- File:Jaslice-trzic2.JPG
- File:Jaslice-trzic3.jpg
- File:VidGajsek - Jaslice OFM 2011.jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 09:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Keep - nativity scenes are folk art which is free in Slovenia. --Sporti (talk) 12:07, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
- Some nativity scenes are folk art, whereas others are not.[3] There is no evidence that these would be folk art - in fact, it is probable and even explicitly written that they're author's work. --Eleassar (t/p) 15:32, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivatives of non-free content are prohibited on Commons FASTILY 08:45, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Nativity scenes of Slovenia
[edit]Non-free scenes.
Eleassar (t/p) 09:24, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:34, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Non-free reliquiary. Eleassar (t/p) 09:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Non-free reliquiary. Eleassar (t/p) 09:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
User:russavia just added another coyrighted image. He/She is known for doing that. (Source : https://www.flickr.com/photos/quinnanya/5893312732/ ) Nucleos (talk) 10:09, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Keep This is CC-by-sa licensed on Flickr today. It was presumably licensed as such in 2012, when Flickrbot checked it. So why should this be deleted as copyvio, other than as sheer persecution of Russavia? Andy Dingley (talk) 10:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Anyone using the DR process for defamation and hostile disruption should be blocked. Trolling at its worst. --Fæ (talk) 10:33, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Comment I don't see any copyright issues here. The file was reviewed by the upload bot when the file was uploaded as cc-by-sa-2.0, and the upload bot was as far as I know programmed so that it never would upload files with bogus copyright information. The file is also listed as cc-by-sa-2.0 today. No valid reason for deletion given. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:03, 26 May 2015 (UTC)- Keep Quite nonsensical DR. License, revision and Flickr page are clear, and I can't see anything in EXIF data that could cast a doubt.--Pere prlpz (talk) 17:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Hi there, I'm the photographer (I saw this paged linked from my Flickr stats page today), and I wanted to confirm that the stated license is accurate as it appears here and on the Flickr page. --Quinnanya (talk) 04:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- I do not care much about russavia, and have been wrong to declare this image was not well licensed, I apologize. Still, the case is not that clear: I do not see any indication that the torso here belongs to a body who accepts to be on Wikipedia. (Quinnanya should give at least his oral testimony that it is the case.) AND why one more torso here? We have [4] already full of them? (But I see there is no rule on Commons for such a debate -- so let us forget this debate -- and focus on the en:Model_release.) Nucleos (talk) 14:58, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- "I do not care much about russavia," Please, don't take us for fools. You have a handful of edits at Commons, yet you pop up with a deletion rationale of, "User:russavia just added another coyrighted image. He/She is known for doing that."
- As to the subject here, then it's a shot of some stage show in Las Vegas. If the chap involved is such a blushing violet he doesn't wish to be photographed, perhaps he ought to consider a less showbiz career? Andy Dingley (talk) 15:25, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- It seems I have been on Wikipedia projects longer than you, but I am indeed less active than you are. I repeat: I do not care about russalvia, I discovered his/her name when I stumbled on the image. THEN, I got to know this user had an erratic behaviour on Wikimedia. And I am rather certain I won't inquire much more into what he/she has uploaded to Wikimedia, since it seems a crime to get interested into that... plus i really do not care.
- As to the subject here, I was deeply shocked to see that in the US this seems to be legal, as mentionned in this article [5]. In France, this is just impossible to shoot someone in the street without any consent and post it on Wikipedia. It seems in the US, you can just do that. No wonder the looks are so important over there. Thus, this alleviates the case here and my concerns, as no legal pursuit can be made against Wikimedia, and I withdraw myself from this DR, with my renewed apologies. Nucleos (talk) 15:49, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dqfn13 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope: not a famous person, very low quality Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:25, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- It is also not being used as the article was a privacy violoation of this non-famous girl. Dqfn13 (talk) 14:11, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
wrong licence Boreczech15 (talk) 11:02, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Uploader requesting deletion; not useful and not needed Jc86035 (talk • contributions • uploads) 11:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Uploader requesting deletion; not useful and not needed Jc86035 (talk • contributions • uploads) 11:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Uploader requesting deletion; not useful and not needed Jc86035 (talk • contributions • uploads) 11:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Uploader requesting deletion; not useful and not needed Jc86035 (talk • contributions • uploads) 11:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Uploader requesting deletion; not useful and not needed Jc86035 (talk • contributions • uploads) 11:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Uploader requesting deletion; not useful and not needed Jc86035 (talk • contributions • uploads) 11:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Uploader requesting deletion; not useful and not needed Jc86035 (talk • contributions • uploads) 11:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Uploader requesting deletion; not useful and not needed Jc86035 (talk • contributions • uploads) 11:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Uploader requesting deletion; not useful and not needed Jc86035 (talk • contributions • uploads) 11:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Uploader requesting deletion; not useful and not needed Jc86035 (talk • contributions • uploads) 11:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
erreur de photo LadyPaname (talk) 11:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Seemingly bogus copyright tag. There is no indication that en:Abdul Bari Jahani and de:Babrak Wassa, who created the national anthem of Afghanistan, ever have been employees of the United States government. Stefan4 (talk) 11:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused .jpg duplicate of ING_logo.png and ING_Group_N.V._Logo.svg 14.2.169.117 11:21, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep normally I would agree but this file is source material to prove that the logo is actuelly released under a free license. Best not to delete it. Natuur12 (talk) 11:25, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep When did "I don't like that file format" become a reason for deletion? Andy Dingley (talk) 12:02, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Natuur12: Not the reason, but I had thought that being unused would justify a deletion. Regards, NeoGeneric (talk) 15:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
w:Kassaman was created by w:Moufdi Zakaria and w:Mohamed Fawzi (artist), who were almost certainly not employees of the United States government when they created this song. Stefan4 (talk) 11:25, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Please remove this deletion request. This anthem is in using, so we all know that is special case of law etc. etc. etc. Or you just can delete all these [6] files. Good luck with that you fucking retard. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 18:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
The composer, w:Manuel Rui, appears to be alive and does not seem to have been an employee of the United States government when the song was composed. Stefan4 (talk) 11:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Please remove this deletion request. This anthem is in using, so we all know that is special case of law etc. etc. etc. Or you just can delete all these [7] files. Good luck with that you fucking retard. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 18:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Datei wird auf keiner Seite verwendet. Wird durch Neukonstruktion 01-Fünfzehneck-Stern-15-2-1 ersetzt. Petrus3743 (talk) 12:21, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:45, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Datei wird auf keiner Seite verwendet. Wird durch Neukonstruktion 01-Fünfzehneck-Sterne-2-4-7-1 ersetzt. Petrus3743 (talk) 12:23, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:45, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Junaid Imam (talk · contribs)
[edit]some are of very low resoulution. not seems useful
- File:Sri Paey, Kaghan.jpg
- File:Shogran, Kaghan.jpg
- File:Neelam Valley AJK.jpg
- File:Mount Malika Parbat, Kaghan.jpg
- File:Lake Lulusar, Kaghan.jpg
- File:Lake Saif al-Mulook, Kaghan.jpg
- File:Kutton Stream, Neelam Valley, Azad Kashmir.jpg
Saqib (talk) 13:02, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Some are small, and some are less small, but all of them are usable. To be sure that we don't need them, you should make sure that we have a better choice for each possible potential educative use of each image.--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:32, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- For example, I can't find in Commons a view of Malika Parbat from the same point than File:Mount Malika Parbat, Kaghan.jpg. Therefore, it's clearly in scope.--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:36, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- I think really small ones should be deleted because yes we have plenty of alternates of each image if you took some time to look for them. A quick search shows we have plenty of big resolution photos of Mount Malika Parbat in Kaghan. --Saqib (talk) 09:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- This image of Malika Parbat will never be a featured or valued image, but it's big enough to be usable. Furthermore, having other images of a mountain is not enough for all potential educative uses, unless we have plenty of images of this notable mountain from this point of view and with similar conditions (of snow cover, lighting, and so), and I think we have none.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Offcourse we have image of same mountain from same point which gives same or better view. Why don't you take some time to look for them? And I want to know what is great about having photo from this specific point? --Saqib (talk) 09:54, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- A different image won't suit all conceivable potential educative uses of this one. If there is one, please point which image is better and equivalent to this one for all conceivable potential educative uses, because I can't find it.--Pere prlpz (talk) 10:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- And about the interest of having different images of the same mountain, I checked the example of another mountain:
- Wikipedias use 64 different images of Mont Blanc [8]. Fortunately, nobody came years ago asking to delete them with the reason "we have a better image of the same mountain".
- One of the most used images of Mont Blanc is File:Mont Blanc 3D small.gif which shows it from different points of view, although it is a very small image. Therefore, it's obvious that images showing mountains from all points of view are of educative use and useful for Wikipedias - as decided by local editors - even if they are small.
- Similar arguments would apply for all other images. Being small but usable is no reason to delete unless clearly shown that a better replacement exists for a any conceivable educative use.--Pere prlpz (talk) 10:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Well I have no more problem if such small resolutions photos can be kept. I always thought such small size photos have no real value so thats why nominated for deletion. --Saqib (talk) 12:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Offcourse we have image of same mountain from same point which gives same or better view. Why don't you take some time to look for them? And I want to know what is great about having photo from this specific point? --Saqib (talk) 09:54, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- This image of Malika Parbat will never be a featured or valued image, but it's big enough to be usable. Furthermore, having other images of a mountain is not enough for all potential educative uses, unless we have plenty of images of this notable mountain from this point of view and with similar conditions (of snow cover, lighting, and so), and I think we have none.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- I think really small ones should be deleted because yes we have plenty of alternates of each image if you took some time to look for them. A quick search shows we have plenty of big resolution photos of Mount Malika Parbat in Kaghan. --Saqib (talk) 09:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: At least one image is a copyright violation, the rest probably too. Didym (talk) 00:44, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence of permission, imagery above threshold of originality. Buxtehude (talk) 13:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 13:11, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 13:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. likely copyvio Saqib (talk) 13:29, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I can't find the image with Google Images. Small resolution alone is no proof of copyvio. Furthermore, this image even has EXIF data.--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I can agree the small resolution are not likely copyvio but it was suspected. Few weeks back I came across few images which were cropped to small sizes in order to avoid caughting by Google Images. I still think this is reall small image and not useful. There's no useful description or title so we cannot identify location which means it have no potential usage. --Saqib (talk) 09:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 13:29, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:38, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 13:29, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:38, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 13:29, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 13:29, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Je suis désolé. Je me suis trompé sur le titre du fichier, qui est "Genève, plaine de Plainpalais - vue aérienne". Comme je ne peux mdofier le titre, j'aimerais pouvoir recommencer de zéro. Par avance merci. Villaf36 (talk) 13:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC) Bonjour, Encore une fois, toutes mes excuses. Je viens de m'apercevoir de l'option de renommage. Je suis vraiment navré, je suis novice sur Wikimedia Commons. Cordialement, Villaf36
Kept: Didym (talk) 00:37, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 14:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 14:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 14:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 14:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 14:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 14:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 14:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 14:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 14:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 14:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 14:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 14:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 14:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 14:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 14:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 14:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 14:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 14:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 14:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Historical painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
likely copyrighted. uploaded by a copyvio guy . Saqib (talk) 14:21, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
likely copyrighted. uploaded by a copyvio guy . Saqib (talk) 14:25, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Songs. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:31, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No elligible to PD-Text Aga (d) 11:32, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:46, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
w:Fair Antigua, We Salute Thee was created in 1967 and neither Novelle Hamilton Richards nor Walter Garnet Picart Chambers seem to have been employees of the United States government at that time. Stefan4 (talk) 11:33, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Datei wird auf keiner Seite verwendet. Wird durch Neukonstruktion 01-Fünfzehneck-Stern-15-7-1 ersetzt. Petrus3743 (talk) 12:19, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:46, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Datei wird auf keiner Seite verwendet. Wird durch Neukonstruktion 01-Fünfzehneck-Stern-15-4-1 ersetzt. Petrus3743 (talk) 12:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:46, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence that this photograph of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:25, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:33, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No clear source or proof that the subject is Stephen Ostojić. For what it's worth, I also seriously question the notability/relevance of this image; it appears to be of no historical or artistic value. Surtsicna (talk) 13:50, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:23, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
deleted. INeverCry 00:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence that this photograph is in the public domain, nor it represent historic figure as noted C3r4 (talk) 16:03, 3 August 2015 (UTC) Deleted Image was previously deleted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:41, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this work is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:44, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this drawing is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this drawing is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this drawing is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this drawing is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this drawing is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this drawing is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this drawing is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this drawing is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this drawing is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this drawing is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this drawing is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this drawing is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this drawing is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this drawing is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this stamp is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:55, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this bust is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this bust is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this bust is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this bust is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this bust is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this bust is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this bust is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this bust is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this bust is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this bust is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this bust is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this bust is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this bust is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this bust is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a coin is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:08, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this photo of a relief is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 13:08, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
This design has not been validated as a coat of arms by means of a Romanian Government resolution, as required by law. As such, it is not a coat of arms and does not fall under ther provisions cited in the licensing template, making it eligible for copyright. —Andrei S. Talk 13:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
SDASM is not the copyright holder -- they are the repository -- their images are full of problems like this one. ZS-JRE (talk) 13:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 15:58, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
small resolution. not useful. Saqib (talk) 13:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
deleted. INeverCry 00:57, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for sculptures. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
The Ambassadors are standing in front of a New York City Tourism Display/tool called City Pulse (not an Art Piece) The use it to explain New York.
- To show visitors the city, and give them information and stories about New York, an interactive tool called City Pulse is used by Tour Ambassadors.-
walknexplore (talk) 14:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Double of the photo previously downloaded by me as author. This one photo was downloaded by me repeatedly by mistake. I'll be grateful for the help in its deletion. Nataliya Shestakova (talk) 14:52, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Poor quality image, perhaps not suited for general use. Better quality version available at File:Een watermolen Rijksmuseum SK-C-144.jpeg and File:Meindert Hobbema - Een watermolen - Google Art Project.jpg. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 07:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Quality is rarely a deletion rationale we accept. PierreSelim (talk) 05:51, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Overwritten file: two in one. The current revision seems to be a TV screenshot and should be deleted. Stefan4 (talk) 16:52, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Empty Gallery (according to user Motopark who nominated this page for speedy deletion.) Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 17:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Motopark: I'd like to oppose this as around 2500 pages [link to http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/West_Bengal&limit=500 this empty gallery]. I re-created this previously deleted page and redirected it to the West Bengal category page for this reason. --Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 17:22, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per Cpt.a.haddock PierreSelim (talk) 05:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
This does not seem to be permanently installed, as required per COM:FOP#Hong Kong. Stefan4 (talk) 17:33, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
sport logo Leha-11 (talk) 17:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably a copyvio PierreSelim (talk) 05:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No evidence for publication >70 years ago as required by the selected copyright tag (70 years after the work was made available to the public). Martin H. (talk) 21:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- It looks like a press or official photo. It's very unlikely that it hadn't been published just after being shot.--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- On this web page it says that the photo was released by the censorship on 20 July 1942, which implies that someone asked to publish it. Probably this was in Volksche Aanval itself, the weekly led by the man depicted. But there is no on-line resource to check that.Karmakolle (talk) 21:47, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Published for more than 70 years. PierreSelim (talk) 05:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
The mural here was designed by David Gentleman, and so will not be public domain for at least 70 years more. Thus this fails COM:FOP#United Kingdom as a 2D graphic work. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
My apologies. I did not know the standard for the UK regarding this. - Ken Eckert
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
No permission given by the original artist: picture is otherwise copyrighted Mr Fink (talk) 22:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Out of scope: personal photo. MJ94 (talk) 23:31, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
only versions 20150526233355 and 20150526235048, because they are distribution maps of different species uploaded by mistake. And by the way reversion because it would be not needed after deletion. Darekk2 (talk) 23:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Two versions deleted. Green Giant (talk) 23:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
"Source: Own work" is untrue: the photo may have been taken by the user who uploaded the image but the book covers were created by the publishers of the French series (Nathan seems to be the company that published the books in France). Surely they must hold the copyright for the covers.
The file could be uploaded to the French Wikipedia with a fair use rationale, but I can't see that the file can be kept at Commons under its current (incorrect) license. Bilorv (talk) 12:41, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- The part of the books that can be seen is composed of very small images, that could be de minimis, and a typographical arrangement. I'm not sure about whether that typographical arrangement could be under threshold of originality in its country.--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:28, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: The images are de minimis, the rest is just text. Yann (talk) 08:21, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adrienne Asher (talk · contribs)
[edit]Although uploaded to Flickr under appropriate licences, I suspect these images are Flickwashed (many can be easily found elsewhere on the internet). Even if the account is real, it would be owned by the subject, and it's unclear if they have the proper authority to release these images under a CC-0 licence.
- File:Conal.Creedon.Devonshire.Street.Cork.Ireland2.jpg
- File:Conal.Creedon.Under.The.Goldie.Fish.JPG
- File:Creedon.on.stage-Shanghai .2010.jpg
- File:Conal.Creedon.boating.U.S.A.JPG
- File:Conal.Creedon.at.Mural.of.Conal.Creedon.jpg
- File:Conal.Creedon.Devonshire.Street.Cork.Ireland.BW.jpg
- File:Cónal Creedon, writer, playwright, documentary filmmaker, Cork, Ireland, 2014.jpg
ColonialGrid (talk) 12:29, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Conal and I are friends, and I'm writing his wiki page for him (my first). Each of these images are Conal's and he's been handing them out for years when reviewers need them. He also uses them on his website. Will you let me know what more I can do to save these images from deletion? Many thanks in advance. Adrienne Asher (talk) 16:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- I'm assuming he didn't take the photos, but instead commissioned them to be taken. Did he get copyright transferred to himself from the photographer, or does he have full reuse rights in perpetuity? If he only has reuse rights, and is not the owner of the copyright, then it would be the copyright holder (likely the photographer) who would have to release them under a free licence. Also, not that it matters on Commons, but if editing English Wikipedia, be aware of en:WP:COI. ColonialGrid (talk) 17:11, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No reply from uploader. Unclear (c) status Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:32, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
A drawing based on a seal - seems like a derived work. Eleassar (t/p) 12:31, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- It's the drawing of a seal of a king that died more than 600 years ago. Therefore, the seal was in the public domain long before copyright was invented and making derived works of it is OK. Do you have any reason to think it's derived from anything more recent?--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- I thought there could be new copyright on the drawing itself, as it probably differs somewhat from the original seal (it seems quite detailed compared to seals themselves [cf. this photo) . But then again, I'm not sure what creative elements there are to make this drawing a new work. So it could be ok. I'll leave it to the administrator to decide. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- You have a point here because the drawing can be found in other places: it was uploaded in 2010 to http://forum.klix.ba/bosanski-kralj-s-krstom-na-glavi-p3563896.html#p3563896 - although it is not the same file. It could be a scan of an old PD drawing, but by now we can't know, and I think the drawing is a derived work from the seal and it would be over threshold of originality in any country.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- I thought there could be new copyright on the drawing itself, as it probably differs somewhat from the original seal (it seems quite detailed compared to seals themselves [cf. this photo) . But then again, I'm not sure what creative elements there are to make this drawing a new work. So it could be ok. I'll leave it to the administrator to decide. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
"Source: Own work" is untrue: the photo may have been taken by the user who uploaded the image but the book covers were created by HarperCollins (as far as I can ascertain).
Surely the copyright for the books is held by the publishers. The file could be uploaded to the Czech Wikipedia with a fair use rationale, but I can't see that the file can be kept at Commons under its current (incorrect) license. Bilorv (talk) 12:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- The part of the books that can be seen is just plain text in a plain background. I think there isn't anything copyrightable in it.--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- As Pere prlpz, I can not see any reason for this request. (Anyway just note. Czech Wikipedia has forbidden image upload, all pictures have to be upload to Commons. Additionally, Czech law does not recognize "fair use"). Best regards --Chmee2 (talk) 06:01, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No creativity needed to make a book cover in one single color. The far right one could be creative, as it has two colors. 
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:36, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Going to rehost it on another media-network. HeraldicUnion (talk) 14:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: CC license can't be revoked Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:54, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
I would like my own image removed from this site as I will rehost it on another media. HeraldicUnion (talk) 16:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: The license you used can't be revoked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
I would like to have my photo removed to upload a better version, thank you. HeraldicUnion (talk) 14:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:48, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Going to upload a better version. HeraldicUnion (talk) 08:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:45, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, no 'freedom of panorama' in France. Judithcomm (talk) 15:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:56, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, no 'freedom of panorama' in France. Judithcomm (talk) 15:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing. No Freedom of Panorama in France. One Architect was: Jean-Claude Dondel (*1904 †1989). Building still under (c) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:30, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, no 'freedom of panorama' in France. Judithcomm (talk) 15:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing. No Freedom of Panorama in France. One Architect was: Jean-Claude Dondel (*1904 †1989). Building still under (c) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:31, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Bold text
Sorry, no 'freedom of panorama' in France. Judithcomm (talk) 15:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- The building dates back to ==1937==. That is more than ==70== years ago--DDupard (talk) 18:30, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing. No Freedom of Panorama in France. One Architect was: Jean-Claude Dondel (*1904 †1989). Building still under (c) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:31, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, no 'freedom of panorama' in France. Judithcomm (talk) 15:19, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing. No Freedom of Panorama in France. One Architect was: Jean-Claude Dondel (*1904 †1989). Building still under (c) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:31, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as «no source (No source since)». Uploader at User_talk:Túrelio#File:Anacleto_Milani-1.jpg states that this is «una foto di famiglia, che possiedo da anni, e che ho fotografato». It should therefore be {{own scan}} (in the broadest sense of "scan", too), not {{own}}. Is a work-for-hire photo taken in 1909 under Italian jurisdiction already in the public domain in 2015? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Per favore é possibile ottenere una risposta in Italiano oppure in francese. Io non capisco l'inglese.--Amidavegre (talk) 21:11, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: IMHO not an artistic work = PD 20 years after creation Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Schekinov Alexey Victorovich (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope (not a BBQ expert, therefore unsure whether we have alternatives for File:Шашлык-башлык!.JPG).
- File:Во лесочке во леске...JPG
- File:Голубая тема.JPG
- File:Форумлянка.JPG
- File:Пикник на обочине....JPG
- File:Групповуха.JPG
- File:Честь имею!.JPG
- File:Странные танцы....JPG
- File:Тема.JPG
- File:Гляньте-че я нашел....JPG
- File:Физкультура.JPG
FDMS 4 17:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Эту бы энергию, да на что-то полезное. -- Schekinov Alexey Victorovich 08:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Done: Some kept, some not. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:23, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
ego de estudiar en profundidad la bibliografía, llegué a la conclusión que el pez de la fotografía en realidad se trata de un ejemplar del género Microglanis, el cual está emparentado con Pseudopimelodus, siendo las características y patrones cromáticos de los ejemplares juveniles pertenecientes a especies de este último, muy similares a los adultos de las especies de Microglanis. Ya he subido las imágenes con el nombre correcto. Ahora retiraré estas de los artículos que no corresponden y recomiendo borrarlas. CHUCAO (talk) 13:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No, la imagen aún está en uso en eu.wikipedia Ezarateesteban 00:00, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Luego de estudiar en profundidad la bibliografía, llegué a la conclusión que el pez de la fotografía en realidad se trata de un ejemplar del género Microglanis, el cual está emparentado con Pseudopimelodus, siendo las características y patrones cromáticos de los ejemplares juveniles pertenecientes a especies de este último, muy similares a los adultos de las especies de Microglanis. Ya he subido las imágenes con el nombre correcto. Ahora retiraré estas de los artículos que no corresponden y recomiendo borrarlas. CHUCAO (talk) 14:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No, está en uso en it.wikipedia en un catálogo Ezarateesteban 00:03, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Luego de estudiar en profundidad la bibliografía, llegué a la conclusión que el pez de la fotografía en realidad se trata de un ejemplar del género Microglanis, el cual está emparentado con Pseudopimelodus, siendo las características y patrones cromáticos de los ejemplares juveniles pertenecientes a especies de este último, muy similares a los adultos de las especies de Microglanis. Ya he subido las imágenes con el nombre correcto. Ahora retiraré estas de los artículos que no corresponden y recomiendo borrarlas. CHUCAO (talk) 14:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: not in use, uploader request Ezarateesteban 00:03, 8 June 2015 (UTC)