Jump to content

Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/04/30

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 30th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably to complex for PD-ineligible. Certainly not CC-BY-SA. Yann (talk) 04:08, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Google does allow CC-BY-SA use of the ANdroid logo, see the images in Category:Android logos. As to this image, it is in use in dawiki, so kept. NVO has a point, if someone wants to challenge the acceptability of the Android logo here, a mass DR would be more suitable than individual DR's such as this one. Without the copyright issue settled, that the DAWP has this in use, the argument about being inferior to other files falls away, and we are left with a keep. Courcelles (talk) 04:57, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by (older) official SVG duplicate. Inferior, unused, out of scope. ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 00:28, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Duplicate, not used. Yann (talk) 08:08, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the version auctioned by Christie's. This is the version at the Yale Center for British Art and duplicates another file in the Commons Rjm at sleepers (talk) 06:31, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please rename. No, duplicate files and renaming are not an issue (provided they have been properly categorized). Ymblanter (talk) 07:48, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GebhardtF

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload error of mine. Romain Dagbert (talk) 09:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User request. Yann (talk) 10:31, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photos is not taken by Lucas Cranach the Elder. Missing correct souce, photographer, license for the file itself. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 10:28, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

strong  Keep, I do not see any reason for deletion. Source =photographer =uploader, license given. Strongly keep because this is the only information we have about artwork inside Melanchthonhaus Bretten. not taken by Lucas Cranach the Elder are you joking? https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AIRR-research-bretten-cranach-research-institute.JPG&type=revision&diff=154299243&oldid=147447251--Oursana (talk) 11:14, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am not joking. The file description page needs a fix. No evidence that this is OWN work. See COM:L --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:31, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. Now i see ... . Why you remove the Licensing template? --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:33, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I did not remove the Licensing template nor source information, I simply used the artwork tl--Oursana (talk) 11:44, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Fixed description page. Pleade do not remove orginal author. Steinsplitter (talk) 11:34, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my art and I've uploaded it in the wrong place by mistake Dvpalumbo (talk) 00:10, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Per uploader requestVera (talk) 12:27, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This version is sourced to a TPB torrent, which is not necessarily a stable source for archive purposes.

A replacement uploaded from somewhere like - https://archive.org/details/Night_Of_The_Living_Dead_raw_HD_WS which confirms a canceled registration would be a far better long term upload choice. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:08, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Please create a DR only when necessary. Yann (talk) 17:18, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this film are in public domain, this film edition are probably from Image Ten's 4K restoration of the public domain film Night of the Living Dead downscaling to 576p, and the Image Ten's 4K restoration are granted registration in part because of "digitally remastered audio and video", "overall film stabilization", and other editing. (PA0002026041). We cannot keep this file per COM:PCP. 6D (talk) 14:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:08, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infrigement hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 23:52, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

copyright infrigement Mk-Wist (talk) 01:00, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 13:01, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author and uploader are different. I did not find the photo in Flickr, but the photographer usually licenses his photos under "All rights reserved." Link to the original photo is needed and if the original is not a free photo, then OTRS-permission from Ron Baker. Taivo (talk) 11:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Taivo - The author (Ron Baker) is the same as the uploader (Crawlin Kingsnake). Crawlin Kingsnake is my user name on both Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. My real name is Ron Baker. I license to Commons (Share Alike) whenever I upload a photo, or when an author wants to use one of my photos from Flickr. I don't change the licensing until I am uploading or allowing others to use one of my photos.

Here is the link to my original photo of Doyle Bramhall on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kingsnake/2666483558

Please remove the deletion request. Thank you.


 Kept, Taivo (talk) 16:44, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non authorized Grey Geezer (talk) 12:03, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete as fast as possible. Thx. Grey Geezer (talk) 12:04, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploaders request. JuTa 19:59, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shaikhnazim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Such personal images have no encyclopaedic value.

Saqib (talk) 21:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Somewhat unlikely own work by uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 23:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of Computer Program and may be copyrighted Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:16, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screen shot of computer program and mat be copyrighted Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:19, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems unlikely that this image is the user's own; he has given no evidence for the same. It is the poster of a film in which he is not credited. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:27, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:45, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo, no permission. Sealle (talk) 14:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Sealle (talk) 15:00, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 16:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 16:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eng Yassen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not within scope, unused personal photos

Rosario Berganza 19:49, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 19:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 19:55, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Genrat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not within scope, unused personal photos

Rosario Berganza 19:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 20:00, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is not the author of the image - site mentionned as source is "© 2015 Aluminerie Alouette" Esprit Fugace (talk) 20:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 20:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 20:10, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 20:12, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 20:22, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 20:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Silvasouza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not within scope, unused personal photos

Rosario Berganza 20:39, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 20:51, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope Rosario Berganza 20:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infrigement? hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 20:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: indeed Didym (talk) 00:17, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader has a lot of copyright violation warnings on his talkpage user talk:Diego HC. This is small photo without metadata, probably also not own work, but copyvio. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:33, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Previously deleted image was File:Marlon Brando The Wild one.jpg and is found more than 300 times by tineye, such as this one which claims it is still copyright. Ww2censor (talk) 12:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:33, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, del. on DE Nolispanmo 12:25, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:32, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope Hang9417 (talk) 12:28, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:32, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My uploader's bad. Jossot died in 1951. — Racconish 📥 13:12, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mgsoell (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement and trivial logos of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:14, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination --Krd 15:49, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:10, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:10, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:09, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mr. AWA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:38, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete this because I've uploaded a wrong example of this screenshot of a menu of the programme GIMP. The problem here is the real name of me is visible; I don't wish it is. Sorry for bothering.--Xeno06 (talk) 17:35, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

size not adjustable Artistjahanzeb (talk) 15:09, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author request/out of scope. Basvb (talk) 15:00, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I suspect this photo is copied from somewhere. The uploader claims it is their own work, but then credits someone else in the description. Random86 (talk) 01:17, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Own work unlikely. Basvb (talk) 15:01, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image, no is a "own work"  Yo, Jacobo.: 01:38, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Own work unlikely Basvb (talk) 15:01, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The USA has no Freedom of Panorama for statues of sculptures installed after 1978, only for buildings, unlike Canada, Mexico, or the UK. Leoboudv (talk) 01:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per discussion. Basvb (talk) 15:02, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image of non-notable person, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:43, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:02, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:44, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:02, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text only, out of scope. Commons is not for publishing your research. P 1 9 9   02:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:03, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:10, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:03, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"I asked the hockey club to let me use the images on a wikipedia page for their club and they accepted my request". That´s not the right way to proceed, please see COM:OTRS Rodrigolopes (talk) 03:30, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:04, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 04:10, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 04:10, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 04:11, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 04:11, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 04:12, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 04:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 04:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 04:14, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 04:15, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Wikimedia organisational related Basvb (talk) 15:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 04:15, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo, no permission. Sealle (talk) 04:34, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Own work unlikely Basvb (talk) 15:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 05:08, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am agreed in delete that at once. It was the wrong file with private and personal content.


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:14, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Pharmacognosy Families Classifications.pdf.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 05:09, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Next please put a nomination template on the other one as well. Basvb (talk) 15:14, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
and File:TRABAJO PRÃ-CTICO INTEGRADOR N 1 de informatica basica.pdf.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 05:10, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also unclear copyrights status of images. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination. Next time please put a nomination template on the other one as well Basvb (talk) 15:14, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dolly van den Akker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

some homepage material not used

Motopark (talk) 05:12, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. (Wikipedia niet voor dit type bestand) Basvb (talk) 15:15, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 05:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Although I disagree with the notion about collages (proper sourcing is enough) this file does not have any attribution or license and as such has to be deleted. Basvb (talk) 15:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof that the images of these carpets are in PD EtienneDolet (talk) 05:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We need some sources for these images used. Basvb (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality image without description or categorization or location, encyclopaedic use difficult Herzi Pinki (talk) 05:16, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:22, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality image without description or categorization or location, encyclopaedic use difficult Herzi Pinki (talk) 05:17, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:22, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is not is a screenschot of a non-free program? Ymblanter (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I'd say too simple. Basvb (talk) 15:25, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promo shot Pierpao.lo (listening) 05:25, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:30, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 06:26, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:30, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal avatar Rosario Berganza 06:32, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:30, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal drawing Rosario Berganza 06:34, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:30, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 06:38, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:30, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the franchise is constantly changing Bossanoven (talk) 06:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I don't see why that's a reason for deletion. Basvb (talk) 15:30, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 06:49, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:30, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 06:57, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:31, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 07:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:31, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Toka Izz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable

Motopark (talk) 07:32, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:32, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 07:39, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:33, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, promotion Rosario Berganza 07:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:33, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 07:43, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:33, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 07:44, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:33, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Msaqibs2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not within scope, unused personal photos

Rosario Berganza 07:47, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:34, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope Rosario Berganza 07:50, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:35, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 07:51, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:35, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

for the same reasons as File:Patrick Prevot.jpg (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Patrick Prevot.jpg). Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 07:53, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:35, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sarbjit singh Dharamgarh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not within scope, unused personal photos

Rosario Berganza 07:53, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:35, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 07:55, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 07:57, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Hang9417 (talk) 07:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 07:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 08:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 08:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vijay Sai. Sathula (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not within scope, unused personal photos

Rosario Berganza 08:04, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 08:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:39, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 08:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:39, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 08:10, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kindly request you to elaborate the problem. I do not understand the issue with the photo. If you can kindly help me understand the issue, I will take care of the same in future. This will help me in avoiding repeating this mistake in future. This is my personal photo.


Kindly request you to elaborate the problem. I do not understand the issue with the photo. If you can kindly help me understand the issue, I will take care of the same in future. This will help me in avoiding repeating this mistake in future. This is my personal photo.


Deleted: Per nomination. The issue is that Commons is not the place to upload personal images which are not likely to be used. Please see commons:Scope Basvb (talk) 15:43, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saurabhpandeydandwaghat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of project scope.

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:01, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saurabhpandeydandwaghat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not within scope, unused personal photos

Rosario Berganza 08:15, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:44, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#United States Artworks and sculptures are not OK Rodrigolopes (talk) 01:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per discussion. Basvb (talk) 15:59, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 24.191.101.3 as Copyvio (copyvio)
Converted by me to DR, as no evidence for a copyvio was presented, though not totally unlikely. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I'd like some form of reasoning/evidence for the copyvio Basvb (talk) 16:00, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 08:17, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:48, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not own work, downloaded screenshot of a demographic (?) map. The user has many uploads, none of which have a source (claiming own work) or Exif. Zoupan (talk) 08:26, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:48, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Images from toto1024.tistory.com, toto1024.tistory.com sources are not usable. — regards, Revi 08:27, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my mistake that I have forgotten the case. I don't appeal this DR. --Puramyun31 (talk) 08:57, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. Basvb (talk) 15:49, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cezar teodosiu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are all screenshots, promotional photos and artwork related to Romanian TV shows. Most likely not own work, as claimed by uploader, as copyright of these images belong to the producers of the shows.

Andrei S. Talk 08:39, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:51, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cezar teodosiu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these self-proclaimed own work are in fact screenshots from copyrighted motion pictures, TV shows and commercials.

Andrei S. Talk 14:14, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Cezar teodosiu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, taken from different websites. One is obviously a selfie done by the subjects, others are found in numerous places on the web by TinEye, some have obvious copyright claims in exif data.

Andrei S. Talk 15:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:33, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional, out of scope Tarawneh (talk) 08:57, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 16:01, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was automatically tagged for speedy deletion as it was uploaded with fair use licensing, I have converted it to a DR as I'm not sure that it's complex enough for copyright protection. January (talk) 09:06, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Two useful criteria for keeping it. First, it might be too simple for copyright protection, if so, then keeping it is obvious. Secondly, other Presidential candidates, such as Barack Obama and Ted Cruz, among others, who have complex logos that warrant copyright protection, are kept because of their value to pages concerning their campaigns. Spartan7W (talk) 13:14, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re your second point, Commons does not accept fair use media (see COM:FAIRUSE), so presumably the examples of complex logos you are quoting are or should be hosted on English Wikipedia. January (talk) 14:24, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: pd-textlogo Basvb (talk) 16:03, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 8a55 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

They are derivative works of photographs by unknown authors from a family archive.

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 16:04, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused own(?) photo. Brateevsky {talk} 09:08, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 16:04, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

자작이 아닌 것으로 의심이 듬 Dever97 (Talk · Contribution) 09:21, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Fastily Basvb (talk) 16:04, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyviol: gmaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 09:47, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 16:05, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a derivative work of a photograph by an unknown author from a family archive. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:28, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 16:05, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, not really educationally useful, out of scope Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:50, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 16:05, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eduxo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are unlikely to be user's own works as they have missing permission and EXIF. and low resolution.

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:52, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by Tarawneh Basvb (talk) 16:06, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My uploader's bad : I just realized Roubille died in 1955. All files in Category:Auguste Roubille should be deleted, to be undeleted in 2026. — Racconish 📥 13:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 16:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears here, http://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/pub/bsf5023-eng.html so unless uploader works for the Canadian Govt ... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 17:00, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SnezanaPRGF (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from non-free software screenshots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not own work. Basvb (talk) 17:02, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 30 April 2015 (UTC) Further information has been supplied, which should resolve questions about the origin and ownership of the photograph[reply]


Kept: Thank you for updating the info. Basvb (talk) 17:03, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Power22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Power22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal images. not useful for education purpose

Saqib (talk) 09:46, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted the historical photos with inproper sources and dates. Kept the personal files, within range of what is acceptible for own user page etc. Basvb (talk) 17:09, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done per corr (photo of 1st mayor of related Brazilian city between 1912—1915), most likely {{PD-BR-1937}} (or also {{PD-Brazil-media}}) =  Keep. Gunnex (talk) 07:34, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per reaction. Basvb (talk) 17:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dr.Rohit Bhamoura (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution, no EXIF data, previously published elsewhere. Conclusion: Not the uploader's own work and no evidence of permission.

--Geniac (talk) 04:04, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:52, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dr.Rohit Bhamoura (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination. 17:17, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kattigara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical maps and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted two of them which are of 3d object and where unlikely own work. Kept the rest because they are clearly 100-400 year old maps and thus all in the public domain because of their age and because most if not all are in use. This does however mean that the licensing and attribution should be improved upon by the original uploader. Sources, dates, authors and licenses have to be fixed. However currently not at the price of a deletion. Basvb (talk) 17:33, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Emine Ülker Tarhan imza.png Cobija (talk) 14:48, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate Basvb (talk) 17:23, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OJSC Techosnastka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

watermarked promotional pictures

Motopark (talk) 18:09, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Yann Basvb (talk) 17:37, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

helemaal mislukt Haagschebluf (talk) 18:12, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 17:41, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused album cover. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:38, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by somebody. Basvb (talk) 17:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused promotional image of album cover. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:38, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by somebody. Basvb (talk) 17:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused image of album cover. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:44, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by somebody. Basvb (talk) 17:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused image of album cover. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:44, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by somebody. Basvb (talk) 17:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused image of album cover. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:45, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by somebody. Basvb (talk) 17:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused image of album cover. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:45, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by somebody. Basvb (talk) 17:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused image of album cover. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:46, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by somebody. Basvb (talk) 17:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 22:10, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I do not see why this is out of scope. Basvb (talk) 17:47, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's out of scope because it is fake. It takes elements from the coat of arms of Northern Cyprus and mixes in Kurdish colours. It's not real. Fry1989 eh? 19:43, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I think, that this is fake. When nominating something for deletion, it's always better to give a good reason. Taivo (talk) 14:33, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Dyolf77 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative of ©Freepik Yann (talk) 22:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yann, just for clarification... this seems to be a pretty obvious copyvio (that is,  Delete). Why have you decided to turn it into a regular DR? Many thanks into advance --Discasto talk 16:03, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I thought that this poster made by some people from the Wikimedia movement had a permission from the copyright. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete No permission to reuse. --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:24, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep after the right source and license were indicated: Free for commercial use with attribution. Regards --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:14, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Looks ok. Basvb (talk) 17:46, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Amitie 10g (talk) 23:09, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No license. Basvb (talk) 17:49, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you categorize the file correctly? This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The uploader responded in talk page and claimed to be the photographer. Taivo (talk) 16:49, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Explanation given not unlikely. Basvb (talk) 18:48, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, as specified. It is a mix of several images, of unknown source. Clarifications are needed regarding authorship and copyright. —Andrei S. Talk 13:19, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: coopyright status unclear Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be replaced with wiki-table. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requesting deletion of old version due to copyright issues, keep the subsequent cropped version - see talk page. Original uploader is okay with deleting old version. -Davidwr (talk) 16:40, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Deleted the older version (kept the new one) as requested. Basvb (talk) 18:52, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The book contains duplicate pages, removing them and uploading new one Sushant savla (talk) 17:04, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: You can use: "Upload a new version of this file" for a new version. Basvb (talk) 18:53, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. В Интернете встречается данное фото ранее загрузки на Викисклад и в более высоком разрешении (см. http://skfo.ru/p/up/1265/142684902206548x500.jpg, http://riadagestan.ru.images.1c-bitrix-cdn.ru/upload/iblock/038/038c2436bb7bbb5d67dbdfeb0f0c58be.jpg?1423558999195559). Dogad75 (talk) 19:28, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS needed Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation same imageMlpearc (open channel) 19:09, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Un-needed duplicate file of [1] Mlpearc (open channel) 19:48, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Duplicate. Basvb (talk) 18:54, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Chevaux et Chien" by Georges Guyot (1885-1973), no freedom of panorama in France. Ras67 (talk) 20:18, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 18:30, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not Public Domain in Germany till 2033. Ras67 (talk) 20:24, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 18:31, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Taureau et daim" by Paul Jouve (1878-1973). No freedom of panorama in France. Ras67 (talk) 20:39, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 18:31, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Charles Yrondy is dead in 1960). No freedom of panorama in France. 82.124.24.2 21:20, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 18:31, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Félix Févola is dead in 1953. No freedom of panorama in France. 82.124.24.2 21:43, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 18:31, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is from olympic gold quest saina Nehwal Facebook page, there is no description if it is copyright free or not, it also seems to be a private event photo, they have made it visible to public may be for promotional purpose which is just like every other celebrity on internet. I uploaded it without knowing about Olympic gold quest as the author as they manages the account and related media for her and other athletes. I dont want to be in any trouble of copyright violations. Plz delete this photo from commons. This is not my work and may be subject to copyright by olympic gold quest. चंद्र शेखर (talk) 07:53, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Administrators,

This file may be a copyrighted image. Seeking deletion as its not my work. Uploaded by mistake as that time i was not knowing about the author.

Thanks for your help चंद्र शेखर (talk) 17:06, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 18:55, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the original uploader, I can attest that the image is no longer applicable as destinations have changed. Sp33dyphil 12:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Is it possible to update the map or is there an updated map somewhere? Basvb (talk) 18:49, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:45, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the original uploader of the image, I can attest that it is no longer applicable. A more up to date destinations map can be found at . Sp33dyphil 12:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Is it possible to update the map or is there an updated map somewhere? Basvb (talk) 18:49, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:45, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sostituita da una versione svg (File:Italia - mappa strada statale 73 bis.svg). Sono l'autore di entrambe. Friedrichstrasse (talk) 16:04, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:47, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheMostAmazingTechnik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files have had OTRS ticket:2012110210009284 added to the file pages as evidence of permission. However, the ticket does not mention these files. Unless there is further evidence of permission, these files should be deleted.

Green Giant (talk) 18:09, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The OTRS mail says: "All those images are released to be used with a free license Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Unported", which is indeed a bit unprecise (but in my opinion clear enough to license all Pixeden pictures properly). Nevertheless, I've sent Pixeden another mail to precise the statement.
Please stay tuned. --TheMostAmazingTechnik (talk) 19:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I read that statement as referring to the five images listed in the first email rather than all of their images. Thanks for sending another email. Green Giant (talk) 20:24, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@TheMostAmazingTechnik and @Green Giant, did anything come out of this mailing? What's the status with those files now? Basvb (talk) 17:41, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Today they have responded. For the new images, they don't like to use CC anymore. But practically, it is usable in any way. "Please feel free to use our resources in that a way as long as they are flatten." Is this OK or not enough? --TheMostAmazingTechnik (talk) 17:48, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: All files on Commons must be released under terms explicitly allowing reuse and modifications by anyone and for any commercial or non-commercial purpose; I can't find any such release on PixEden's website or OTRS.    FDMS  4    23:55, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per FDMS 4 Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the photographer / uploader, and I just received this email from the person who is the subject of the photograph: "Dear Jeffrey Beall, Can you please take down the photo of me you put up on Wikipedia? You do not have my permission to post an image of me. I find the photo unflattering (which I know was not your intent) and would appreciate it if you would remove it. Thank you. Lesléa Newman" Jeffrey Beall (talk) 18:16, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I'd do a courtesy delete if we had another photo of Lesléa Newman. There is no reason to delete this one. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:52, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata contains Nguyen Phuong Thao as the author. Gumruch (talk) 19:35, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've been ordered by Mr. Mertlik himself to upload this picture of him. He has been photographed by Mrs. Nguyen Phuong Thao, but he has the rights to use this picture. --Vulcik (talk) 19:48, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You should definitely NOT use false author name. You should probably manage confirmation from the copyright holder via OTRS. If the files are identical (except size), you should use template {{Duplicate}} in the smaller one. Gumruch (talk) 00:28, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Needs permission via OTRS Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:56, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ákos97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are not {{PD-textlogo}}. They contain significant artistry apart from the lettering (the lettering is only a standard in the US anyway). See COM:TOO.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They do are PD-textlogos. If this is PD, then CN +1 logo is also PD. Please do not delete them. --Ákos97 (talk) 06:39, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Cartoon Network Studios Arabia arabic logo.png would be copyrightable, File:DC Nation.png is on the fence but I'd say ok in the US, the rest are definitely PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 17:42, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom. Above TOO, not text ONLY but graphic elements as well. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:58, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have previously deleted this file as it was already published here, a Russian site with unfree license. Domussa mailed me claiming ownership of this file and saying that the linked site is only an aggregator that used the image. I am creating this discussion in order to allow clarification. Regards. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:39, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no comment / info from uploader. COM:PCP Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This coat of arms has never been approved by resolution of the Romanian Government, thus it is not a coat of arms and not "an official symbol of ... public authorities", so the licensing template does not apply. —Andrei S. Talk 09:50, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't this just the coat of arms of Cluj-Napoca. I'd like some further explanation as to the "not been approved" of this coat of arms. Public authorities can also be the municipality? Basvb (talk) 18:46, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Romanian Law stipulates a procedure for the recognition of coat of arms. This file have no licence "PD-RomaniaGov" because the Romanian Government didn't approve this coat of arms. The licensing of the file is false. --Mihai Andrei (talk) 16:54, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion Krd 14:03, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

edited portrait image of an obviously non-notable person ("This is the photograph of musadiq"), used nowhere over wikimedia. Túrelio (talk) 10:48, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination, I can't see why that image could be usefull. Commons is not a private webhost. abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 15:44, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Sealle (talk) 15:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)---- Deleted: per nomination --Krd 14:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 16:03, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same file which was deleted a week ago? E4024 (talk) 08:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:10, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]