Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/04/26
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
I mistakenly uploaded them to wikimedia commons Hilumeoka2000 (talk) 16:15, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Speedy kept: No reason for deleting another User Talk page. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:50, 26 April 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Files uploaded by Stefan.pocenia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Typical daily low quality nudity/porn exhebitionistic spam without any possible educational use.
- File:Male erect penis oiled.jpg
- File:Male shaved erect penis.jpg
- File:Male shaved erect penis shower.jpg
- File:Nude males with trees.jpg
- File:Nude males with trees2.jpg
- File:Nude man standing in front of a windows.jpg
- File:Nude man standing in front of bulldozer.jpg
Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 22:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed19dz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos of some kind. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:العلامة الشيخ عبد الرحمن الأخضري.PNG
- File:وثيقة تخص عائلة حمادوش وزاوية قجال 3.JPG
- File:وثيقة تخص عائلة حمادوش وزاوية قجال 2.JPG
- File:شيخ محمد خلفي.jpg
- File:العلامة المختار بن الشيخ.jpg
- File:الشيخ عبد الرحمان بن الطيب حمادوش 2.jpg
- File:الشيخ عبد الرحمان بن الطيب حمادوش.jpg
- File:الشيخ محمد الصديق بن الطيب حمادوش.jpg
- File:الشيخ القريشي مدني.jpg
- File:الإمام الشهيد عبد الحميد حمادوش.jpg
- File:الشيخ محمد صالح حمر العين.jpg
- File:رسالة الشيخ محمد العربي التباني الى شيوخ زاوية قجال.JPG
- File:الشيخ محمد العربي التباني.jpg
- File:وثيقة تحدد أراضي وقفية لعائلة حمادوش.JPG
- File:صورة قديمة لزاوية قجال.jpg
- File:مسجد قجال الجديد.jpg
- File:مسجد زاوية قجال القديم.jpg
- File:زاوية بن حمادوش قجال.png
- File:وثيقة تحدد أراضي حمادوش ڤجال.jpg
- File:زاوية بن حمادوش ڤجال.jpg
- File:ضريح سيدي مسعود (رضي الله عنه)2.jpg
- File:ضريح سيدي مسعود (رضي الله عنه)1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed19dz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images with no EXIF data, not own work, some are derivatives with no informations about permissions
- File:مقام سيدي مسعود الحسني.jpg
- File:Guidjel.19DZ.png
- File:Guidjel.19ALG.png
- File:ضريح سيدي مسعود الحسني.jpg
- File:العلامة الشيخ محمد العربي التباني ،رضي الله عنه.jpg
- File:Daïra de Guidjel 19 DZ.PNG
- File:Daïra de Guidjel.jpg
- File:صورة قديمة لزاوية قجال -202.jpg
- File:ضريح الشيخ عبد الرحمن الأخضري بنطيوس , طولقة , بسكرة , الجزائر.jpg
- File:الملعب الإفريقي السطايفي.PNG
- File:حمام أولاد يلس , مزلوق , عين آرنات , سطيف , الجزائر.PNG
- File:وثيقة تخص عائلة حمادوش وزاوية قجال 4.JPG
- File:36.092230°N 5.487371°E بلدية ڤجال - احداثيات.PNG
- File:DZ - 19 - Guidjel - Guidjel - بلدية ڤجال - دائرة ڤجال - ولاية سطيف - الجزائر.jpg
- File:Dz - 19 - Guidjel - دائرة ڤجال - ولاية سطيف.jpg
- File:Dz - 19 - Guidjelدائرة ڤجال.png
- File:ضريح الشيخ عبد الرحمن الأخضري.PNG
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:27, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed19dz (talk · contribs)
[edit]probably also not own work
- File:الملعب الإفريقي السطايفي (19).jpg
- File:Stade Africain Sétifien3.PNG
- File:كتيبة الشهداء (الملعب الإفريقي السطايفي) سطيف.PNG
- File:الملعب الإفريقي سطيف 19.PNG
- File:Stade Africain Sétifien 23.PNG
- File:Stade Africain Sétifien 22.PNG
- File:Stade Africain Sétifien 2.jpg
- File:Stade Africain Sétifien.jpg
- File:الوثيقة 4 جامع قجال.JPG
- File:الوثيقة 3 جامع قجال.JPG
- File:الوثيقة 2 جامع قجال.JPG
- File:الوثيقة 1 جامع قجال.JPG
- File:Httpswww.google.commapssearch-D8-B2-D8-A7-D9-88-D9-8A-D8-A9+-D8-A8-D9-86+-D8-AD-D9-85-D8-A7-D8-AF-D9-88-D8-B4-E2-80-AD@36.0922225,5.4859385,17zdata=!3m1!4b1.jpg
- File:شعار قجال.jpg
- File:قجال.jpg
- File:مسجد زاوية قجال القديم.jpg
- File:سطيف.png
- File:ڤجال ,سطيف ,الجزائر.png
- File:ڤجال 3.PNG
- File:ڤجال 2.jpg
Didym (talk) 22:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:38, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed19dz (talk · contribs)
[edit]False authorship claims by serial copyright violator and sockpuppeteer. Non-free sports logos and low-resolution photos grabbed from the Internet.
- File:الشعار الحالي لإتحاد سطيف.jpg
- File:صورة لفريق اتحاد سطيف في نهائي ، كأس الجزائر 2005.jpg – http://usms-setif-1933.blogspot.com/2013/05/usmsetif.html
- File:الملعب الإفريقي سطيف.jpg
- File:تشكيلة الوفاق السطايفي2.jpg – http://sport.echoroukonline.com/articles/22947.html
- File:الشعار الرسمي الحالي لنادي وفاق سطيف.jpg
- File:الشعار السابق لوفاق سطيف.jpg
- File:الشعار الأسبق لوفاق سطيف.jpg
- File:USMS.gif
- File:S,A,Setif.PNG
—LX (talk, contribs) 19:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Per Nomination: Files deleted, account blocked. --Rosenzweig τ 23:04, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Owning a photograph does not make one the owner of the copyright. In order to keep this, we need a license from the photographer or evidence that it was published before 1989 without a copyright notice. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Hello Jim, you can go ahead and delete it. I don't have any record of it. The photo was taken during the 30's or 40's, way before 1989 for sure. My dad passed away around 1989 at 80 yrs old. The pic is definitely not a man in his 70-80's. GEOGOZZGEOGOZZ (talk) 12:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 08:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Based on the users's other uploads (tagging corporate logos and a professional studio photo as self-made works), it is difficult to believe this claim of authorship. B (talk) 11:30, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
I mistakenly uploaded the image to wikipedia commons Hilumeoka2000 (talk) 16:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:53, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Corporate logo, so user's claim of authorship is dubious. The logo clearly passes a threshold of originality for copyright protection.. B (talk) 11:27, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
I mistakenly uploaded the image to wikipedia commons Hilumeoka2000 (talk) 16:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Corporate logo, so user's claim of authorship is dubious. The logo clearly passes a threshold of originality for copyright protection. B (talk) 11:27, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
I mistakenly uploaded the image to wikipedia commons Hilumeoka2000 (talk) 16:34, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 00:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:14, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by William Ksanova (talk · contribs)
[edit]not within scope, self promotion
Rosario Berganza 00:04, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:14, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 00:05, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:15, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Text only, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:16, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 03:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:16, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, plain text Rosario Berganza 03:12, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:16, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abeleduardo 19 (talk · contribs)
[edit]not within scope, unused personal photos
Rosario Berganza 03:15, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Esmeralda15 (talk · contribs)
[edit]not within scope, unused personal photos
Rosario Berganza 03:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 03:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:18, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope Rosario Berganza 03:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:18, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 03:23, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:18, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 03:25, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:18, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 03:26, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:18, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 03:28, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:18, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 03:35, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:18, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 03:46, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:19, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, badly tilted photo, low resolution Rosario Berganza 03:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:19, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
File name indicates photo taken from a Tumblr blog, image available everywhere. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:58, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:19, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 04:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:20, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ricardo Amaya Lopez (talk · contribs)
[edit]not within scope, unused personal photos
Rosario Berganza 04:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:20, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arindam Biswas(Bacchu) (talk · contribs)
[edit]not within scope, unused personal photos
Rosario Berganza 04:15, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:20, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 04:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:21, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 04:18, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:21, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 04:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:21, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sukhjinder singh ghagga (talk · contribs)
[edit]not within scope, spam/promotion
- File:J1 copy.png
- File:Ghagga.in comp.jpg
- File:Ghagga.jpg
- File:Ghagga..jpg
- File:Ghagga.in Computer's.jpg
Rosario Berganza 04:20, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:22, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sukhjinder singh ghagga (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 08:47, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 08:47, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:17, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 04:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:23, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope Rosario Berganza 04:24, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:23, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 04:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:23, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ENRUTAMOS S.A.S (talk · contribs)
[edit]not within scope, promotion
Rosario Berganza 04:29, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:24, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 04:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:25, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arturo alastuey (talk · contribs)
[edit]A series of tables, text documents, out of COM:SCOPE.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:15, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:25, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal file 37.5.2.252 12:15, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:27, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal file 37.5.2.252 12:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:26, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal file 37.5.2.252 12:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:27, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:28, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MandyTurner7 (talk · contribs)
[edit]not within scope, unused personal photos
Rosario Berganza 23:42, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:30, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 23:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:30, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rgproductionts (talk · contribs)
[edit]not within scope, promotion
- File:In The Airee.jpg
- File:Extermination4.jpg
- File:COVER FITO DESERT 2014 2.jpg
- File:Fitop.jpg
- File:Portada FITO DESERT 2014 2-crop.jpg
Rosario Berganza 21:28, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:44, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 21:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:44, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Davidkotoko (talk · contribs)
[edit]not within scope, unused personal photos
Rosario Berganza 21:35, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:43, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 21:42, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:42, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohd Redzham Haji Salleh (talk · contribs)
[edit]not within scope, unused personal photos
Rosario Berganza 21:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:41, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 21:49, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:41, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 21:55, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Δημήτρης Καραγιάννης (talk · contribs)
[edit]not within scope, promotion
Rosario Berganza 21:57, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:35, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:39, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:36, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:39, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by سامي الرحيلي (talk · contribs)
[edit]not within scope, unused personal photos
Rosario Berganza 23:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:37, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 23:23, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:38, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 23:24, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:36, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope Rosario Berganza 23:30, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:36, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 23:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:36, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 23:34, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:36, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jhennifer Araujo (talk · contribs)
[edit]not within scope, unused personal photos
- File:Luis Pedro Mariz.jpg
- File:Pedro Mariz.jpg
- File:Pedro Mariz Batista.jpg
- File:Luis Pedro Batista.jpg
- File:Luis Pedro Mariz Batista.jpg
- File:Luis Mariz.jpg
Rosario Berganza 23:40, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters ✔ 03:35, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
I mistakenly uploaded this image to wikipedia commons Hilumeoka2000 (talk) 16:28, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . JuTa 19:04, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
There are SVG files of the UN logo. Fry1989 eh? 17:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 20:48, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.
- File:Emb.Guatemala.jpg
- File:Embajada.Austria.jpg
- File:Consulado.Oporto.jpg
- File:Consulado.Riohacha.jpg
- File:Consulado.PuertoCarreno.JPG
- File:Consulado.Cucuta.jpg
- File:Consulado.Bucaramanga.jpg
- File:Consulado.Barranquilla.jpg
- File:Emb.RepublicaDominicana.jpg
- File:Emb.Argelia.jpg
- File:Emb.Congo.jpg
- File:Emb.Mozambique.jpg
- File:Emb.Paraguay.jpg
- File:Consulado.Aruba.jpg
- File:Emb.Vietnam.jpg
- File:Consulado.SaoPaulo.jpg
- File:Consulado.Belem.jpg
- File:Emb.Suiza.jpg
- File:Emb.Grenada.jpg
- File:Emb.Sudafrica.jpg
- File:Emb.Suriname.jpg
- File:Emb.Portugal.jpg
- File:Emb.Italia.jpg
- File:Emb.Colombia.jpg
- File:Emb.Bolivia.jpg
- File:Emb.Chile1.jpg
- File:Emb.Hungria.png
- File:Emb.Suecia.png
- File:Consulado.Madrid.jpg
- File:Emb.Belgica.jpg
- File:Consulado.Frankfurt.jpg
- File:Emb.Alemania.jpg
- File:Emb.China.jpg
- File:Consulado.Curazao.jpg
- File:Consulado.Arauca.JPG
- File:Emb.Chile.jpg
- File:Emb.Belarus.jpg
- File:Emb.Costa Rica.jpg
- File:Emb.Canada.jpg
- File:Emb.UAE.jpg
- File:Emb.Guyana.jpg
- File:Emb.Qatar.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete despite being freely licence this Flickr user https://www.flickr.com/people/jaime_santander_/ appears to only have copyright violations, which this likely is also. The image has a watermark of Nicky Jam and probably came from Nicky Jam's own website but currently it only has one homepage image so there is no way to verify might even the image is freely licenced. The log shows that an image by the same name has previously been uploaded and deleted six times. Perhaps the file name should be blocked. Ww2censor (talk) 15:58, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom in the absence of OTRS (& an IP removed the DR FWIW) --Herby talk thyme 16:42, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:NJ - Nicky Jam.jpg. --NeilN (talk) 02:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:26, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Promotional, with no relevance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zerabat (talk • contribs) 2015-04-24T02:08:06 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:25, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Please check, I think you can delete it. --Reneman (talk) 18:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:25, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Alleged violation of copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by VladislavNedelev (talk • contribs) 2015-04-25T19:21:36 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:23, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
DeleteViolation of copyright --Levi bernardo 19:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Delete100% copyvio--Anningia (talk) 14:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Delete I have even asked the author if this was okay, and she(?) said that she would like it to be deleted. IJReid (talk) 14:57, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- I see what the problem here is.anybody mind changing this to speedy?--Anningia (talk) 17:31, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:23, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Alleged violation of copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by VladislavNedelev (talk • contribs) 2015-04-25T19:21:19 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Alleged violation of copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by VladislavNedelev (talk • contribs) 2015-04-25T19:21:43 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Alleged violation of copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by VladislavNedelev (talk • contribs) 2015-04-25T19:20:56 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Alleged violation of copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by VladislavNedelev (talk • contribs) 2015-04-25T19:21:27 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 20:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:21, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pandaismyname1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]not within scope, unused personal photos
Rosario Berganza 20:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Uploader has reputation of claiming ownership of other people's images. This on obviously not by uploader. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Uploader has reputation of claiming ownership of other people's images. This on obviously not by uploader. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Strangely enough this was uploaded by a "completely different user" weeks ago and was subsequently deleted so seems odd to reappear at the exact same name (To be fair I can't remember if it was the exact same image or if this one's completely different), Anyway obv copyvio . –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:22, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Uploader has reputation of claiming ownership of other people's images. This on obviously not by uploader. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:52, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Uploader has reputation of claiming ownership of other people's images. This on obviously not by uploader. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:52, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:19, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Uploader has reputation of claiming ownership of other people's images. This on obviously not by uploader. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:53, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:19, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Uploader has reputation of claiming ownership of other people's images. This on obviously not by uploader. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:53, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Uploader has reputation of claiming ownership of other people's images. This on obviously not by uploader. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Uploader has reputation of claiming ownership of other people's images. This on obviously not by uploader. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Uploader has reputation of claiming ownership of other people's images. This on obviously not by uploader. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Uploader has reputation of claiming ownership of other people's images. This on obviously not by uploader. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:55, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:16, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Uploader has reputation of claiming ownership of other people's images. This on obviously not by uploader. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:55, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:16, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
both flickr sources are invalid links Majo statt Senf (talk) 16:18, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:45, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 21:03, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:14, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 21:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:14, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, non-notable low rank serviceman Rosario Berganza 21:11, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:14, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, so blurred it's unreadable Rosario Berganza 21:12, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:12, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 21:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:13, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 21:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:13, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Watermark, small size, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 21:45, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:03, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, promotion Rosario Berganza 22:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Agamitsudo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not absolutly sure but strong doubt ; Not a valid speedy deletion rationale. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Comment Seems that the image comes from Les Fermes de Retord's website. But what about the satellite map? Is it free-licensed or PD? Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
small photo with no metadata, maybe copyvio Rosario Berganza 23:11, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:54, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 23:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:50, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope Rosario Berganza 23:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:50, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
not within scope Rosario Berganza 23:55, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:50, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:33, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Permission from Jay Sansone filed via OTRS--Sphilbrick (talk) 18:16, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Commons isn't a personal scrapbook or photo album. The images nominated are certificates, documents, pictures of children and a man, two older images, one claimed as self, and a head shot which is not a selfie. Possible COM:COPYVIOs as well.
- File:Tara0001.jpg
- File:Kulturbakanitakdirbelgesi.jpg
- File:TİDBELGESİ.jpg
- File:Soyadı2.jpg
- File:Soyadı1.jpg
- File:TAKDİR.jpg
- File:Halit ziya KARTAL.JPG
- File:DSC 5350.JPG
- File:Baba ve mahdumları.jpg
- File:Elmalı mavi fon.jpg
- File:Kaymakam Eyüp Sabri KARTAL-.jpg
- File:Abdulhamit.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:29, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 06:52, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fede Gemignani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Canosa Agrupacion.jpg
- File:Barrionuevo Maria jose.png
- File:Troncoso.jpg
- File:Rossi-ene-3.jpg
- File:Roxana monzon.jpg
- File:Albornoz- Jorge.jpg
- File:Chavero y Menendez.jpg
- File:HCD-Ramirez-4.jpg
- File:Menendez merlo.jpg
- File:Gustavo Menendez TW.jpeg
- File:Menendez-scioli.jpg
- File:Menendez-Lula.jpg
- File:Menendez 2011.jpg
- File:GM-Arias-Alessi-2.jpg
- File:Cartel GM cristina conduccion.jpg
- File:Menendez en reunion con cariglino.jpg
- File:Menendez mochila verde.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 06:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from non-free software screenshots.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 06:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 06:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 06:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 06:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 06:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 06:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 06:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Christian Hartmann (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status. Flickr reviewed divulgation photos (mostly tagged with"divulgação", customarily used in Brazil for crediting reproduction of works taken by others) of en:Emicida (a Brazilian MC), published on his Flickr stream, but originally taken by several photographers (examples: "Ênio César", ""Janaina Castelo Branco", "Gerardo Lazzari", "Sergio Carvalho", "Luciana Faria") which need individual permissions to be licensable under a CC license.
- File:Renan Samam.jpg
- File:Rael da Rima.jpg
- File:KL Jay Racionais MC's.jpg
- File:Criolo Doido.jpg
- File:Mixtape de ouro.jpg
- File:Pepeu.jpg
- File:Flora Matos Mix.jpg
- File:Emicida e Pepeu.jpg
- File:Emicida e Axl.jpg
- File:Rael Renan e Dan Dan.jpg
- File:DJ Nyack MTV.jpg
- File:DJ Nyack.jpg
- File:Emicida Divulgação editado.jpg
- File:Emicida Divulgação Emicídio2.jpg
- File:Emicida Divulgação Emicídio.jpg
- File:Emicida Sesc Pompeia2.jpg
- File:Emicida Sesc Pompeia.jpg
- File:Emicida e Max BO.jpg
- File:Emicida A Rua é Nóiz.jpg
- File:Emicida5.jpg
- File:Emicida e DJ Nyack2.jpg
- File:Kamau Emicida Fióti Nyack.jpg
- File:Emicida Hole Club2.jpg
- File:Projota e Emicida.jpg
- File:Emicida4.jpg
- File:Emicida3.jpg
- File:Emicida e LPs.jpg
- File:Emicida Ibirapuera.jpg
- File:Show Emicida.jpg
- File:Emicida Hole Club.jpg
- File:Emicida Espaço Soma.jpg
- File:Emicida e DJ Nyack.jpg
- File:Emicida Na Humilde.jpg
- File:Emicida Instituto.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 15:36, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate of SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 02:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: unused poor duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 07:25, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.2.252 10:04, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:26, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" ( 6 KB, no metadata) 37.5.2.252 11:29, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, out of project scope. --Ras67 (talk) 12:40, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.2.252 11:45, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.2.252 11:53, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:30, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.2.252 11:53, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:30, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.2.252 11:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal file 37.5.2.252 12:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal file 37.5.2.252 12:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal file 37.5.2.252 12:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal file 37.5.2.252 12:03, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal file 37.5.2.252 12:03, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal file 37.5.2.252 12:05, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
It is too small and blurred, and so not useful for any project. It is replaceable by larger, clearer images in "Category:Black pepper crab". — SMUconlaw (talk) 12:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.2.252 12:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
this image is blurry. in commons are many clear images of rosemary. --Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 13:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
this image is blurry. we have a clear version: File:Rosemary-spice.jpg --Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 09:27, 19 April 2015 (UTC)}}
Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 09:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
this image is blurry. the author uploaded a clean image similar. File:Gazania rigens 0.2 R.jpg --Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 19:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Poor near-duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 07:48, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
out of scope 80.187.218.82 12:12, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy close - drive by noms by IP Herby talk thyme 15:01, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
not within scope, not educationally useful Rosario Berganza 22:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Halilkayaduman (talk · contribs)
[edit]No EXIF data, small size, unlikely to be own works.
- File:CemileOzmen.jpg
- File:BerkeSarisoy.jpg
- File:EsraSolak.jpg
- File:MerveKoseler.png
- File:AysegulOzay.jpg
- File:YagmurKiper.jpg
- File:Altınay OZEN.jpg
- File:Ceren KARA.jpg
- File:KevserPeker.jpg
- File:Aysegul OKUMUS.jpg
Yann (talk) 21:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Halilkayaduman (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused low quality images of non-notable people
- File:AyseKirmizi.jpg
- File:SunaKiyak.jpg
- File:SercanKarakas.png
- File:NazliKemaloglu.jpg
- File:BurcuOzcan.jpg
INeverCry 01:56, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope --George Chernilevsky talk 04:44, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Own work unlikely Basvb (talk) 15:21, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
NC-ND licenses are not accepted on commons - compare Commons:Licensing. JuTa 00:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: User has changed the license upon the deletion request, changing it into a template could prove useful Basvb (talk) 15:23, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Obviously not taken by the uploader as claimed. Other upload claimed as owned by this uploader proven copyvios. See File:Dakota Fanning Save the Children 2014.jpg All uploads likely copyright violations and all should be deleted Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:23, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- See here. All should be deleted. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:25, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 15:24, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EtienneDolet (talk · contribs)
[edit]Part of a series of dubious uploads from this user about the Armenian genocide commemorations (see user's talk), taken in 3 different countries within a 2-day period, all missing EXIF and having different resolutions, and all claimed as own work; three of these files were found to have been previously uploaded and tagged as copyvios; the origin of the remaining two could not be determined but they're likely not the work of the uploader either.
Underlying lk (talk) 00:57, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- From this tweet : [1] Varmin (talk) 12:59, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion Basvb (talk) 15:24, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Detail of a painting by T. Prytherch, 1907. Attributed in a National Library of Wales website.[2] Verbcatcher (talk) 02:23, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- This image is used in several Wikipedia pages. I hope that a fair use rationale can be established. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:25, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- The artist is presumably Thomas Prytherch (1864-1926) [3] Verbcatcher (talk) 02:29, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Thomas Prytherch died more than 70 years ago, so out of copyright according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United Kingdom. Is this sufficient to keep the image? Is the license declaration correct? Verbcatcher (talk) 03:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Keep: Reproductions of old 2D works (including digitalization of these ones) does not give new copyright (including museums), and therefore, the picture is already in the PD. {{PD-old-70}} effectivelly applies here. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion Basvb (talk) 15:25, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Dubious license. Uploader claims it is his own work, but image appears here: http://www.greenwichmag.com/g/February-2013/Righting-the-Wrong/ Niteshift36 (talk) 03:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 15:26, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
watermark indicates image taken from social media site Ytoyoda (talk) 03:58, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 15:26, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
a near duplicate of File:¦-.Hakk¦- Bursevi Hz..JPG except that one is more complete image than this one which has the top cut off. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:28, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use, and both images seem to be of equal quality Basvb (talk) 15:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
No details of the author, source or publication date are given, making it uncertain if the image is correctly tagged, or may still be under copyright. Hchc2009 (talk) 06:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: :Given the style of the image the work being over 200 years old is very likely. The image is already 10 years on commons and widely in use. Basvb (talk) 15:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
No publication date or author is given; the anonymous UK tag is invalid, as no evidence is given of the research done to establish the painter's identity; no valid US tag is provided Hchc2009 (talk) 06:52, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Nonsense request: http://www.bridgemanimages.com/en-GB/asset/311032/english-school-20th-century/the-queen-pleads-for-the-men-of-calais-1914-colour-litho 37.5.2.252 08:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- The UK web page you've given gives no details as to whether it was ever originally published, claims copyright over the image itself under UK law and notes that "The copyright status of this image is either dependent on the territories into which you are publishing or is undetermined due to limited information on the creator. Please contact us if you have any questions." As it stands, the Commons image file has no valid US or UK tag on it. Indeed, an anonymous, unpublished image is protected for 120 years after the date of creation in the US, so would be under copyright in the US until 2034. Hchc2009 (talk) 08:37, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- An interesting question for Bridgneman may be: "Why do you try to sell free artwork (free in the country of its origin and in the US) although you cannot name its author?" 37.5.2.252 08:59, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- The underlying image is not necessarily free in the UK (there is conditionality involved in a UK anonymity claim), and under UK law Bridgeman's reproduction of it may well introduce a new, additional copyright; and the original may well not be free in the US either, thus their warning tag on the webpage. Hchc2009 (talk) 09:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- An interesting question for Bridgneman may be: "Why do you try to sell free artwork (free in the country of its origin and in the US) although you cannot name its author?" 37.5.2.252 08:59, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- The UK web page you've given gives no details as to whether it was ever originally published, claims copyright over the image itself under UK law and notes that "The copyright status of this image is either dependent on the territories into which you are publishing or is undetermined due to limited information on the creator. Please contact us if you have any questions." As it stands, the Commons image file has no valid US or UK tag on it. Indeed, an anonymous, unpublished image is protected for 120 years after the date of creation in the US, so would be under copyright in the US until 2034. Hchc2009 (talk) 08:37, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: The author seems to be unknown (english school) at multiple sources where normally attribution to a known author would be likely Basvb (talk) 15:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
As an anonymous work with no evidence of publication with the permission of the creator, it is copyright in the US until 120 years after creation (1914) making the work still in copyright in the US until 2034 Hchc2009 (talk) 22:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- This image has been kept earlier today, however this argument has not fully been explored previously. Another thing: Could you refrain from deleting valid licenses from images which have just been kept per that license simply because you disagree? As you can see in my reasoning in keeping the file basic research has been done and the author being unknown is not by a lack of looking into it. Basvb (talk) 23:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Basvb, this was actually exactly the argument I put above originally on 26 April (!), which you examined yesterday: have a look at the text above ("no valid US tag is provided... an anonymous, unpublished image is protected for 120 years after the date of creation in the US, so would be under copyright in the US until 2034.") To state the obvious, images on the Commons require both a US and UK tag - at the moment the image doesn't have a valid US tag; if the image is anonymous and there is no evidence of it being originally published with the creator's consent, then it is still under copyright in the US.
- In terms of the UK tag, take another look at the tag. You'll see that there's a key phrase in it, which says " If you wish to rely on it, please specify in the image description the research you have carried out to find who the author was." This is an important part of UK copyright law, as someone (e.g. an editor here) using a claim of anonymity in the UK must demonstrate that "the author cannot be ascertained by reasonable enquiry" - for example by conducting research, asking the original source of the image where they acquired it, etc., and showing what steps they took to get to that conclusion (e.g. what were the "multiple sources" checked? Did you email any companies currently offering the image for sale? etc.). This is different (I believe) from the situation in the Netherlands and much of Europe, which doesn't require this to be done..
- The British Academy gives some useful advice here in pleasantly plain English (!) (see here, section 8). They note that "the potential user should be able to demonstrate that serious efforts have been made in good faith to locate and contact the rights owner, including all reasonably available avenues of inquiry, before any use of the work not already permitted by law... may be made." There's a useful list of examples in that section to illustrate what this might mean.
- You've restored the tag, but still haven't provided this information, which is essential for the claim. That's important legally. I've no problem in principle with you adding a UK-anonymous tag to this file, but if you do so, you do need to follow the Commons rules and specify what research you undertook in the image description. Hchc2009 (talk) 03:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy kept deletion requests is not a page where you can continue hammering after it was kept. Multichill (talk) 12:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: source given is labeled " © T.J. Cheng, 2014. Simpl" MGA73 (talk) 07:15, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The photo was uploaded in 2008 so copyright in 2014 does not make sense. I undeleted the file on wts and it was uploaded there by T.J. Cheng. It is the transfer info that is incorrect. I'll fix it. --MGA73 (talk) 07:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Search "Trcheng" and there is a lot of files where the blog is mentioned. For example File:Taipeiview.jpg. --MGA73 (talk) 07:26, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per MGA73's reasoning Basvb (talk) 15:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Poor quality image of mine not in use, File:Say No to Xenophobia 1.jpg is a better version of the same subject. HelenOnline 10:36, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 15:41, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
old version Peter1170 (talk) 11:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: I do not see a reason for deletion. Basvb (talk) 15:40, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Crown copyright according to http://history.wiltshire.gov.uk/community/getimage.php?id=352, no indication of a release into the public domain as claimed or that any other free licence such as {{OGL}} might apply. January (talk) 11:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 15:41, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Web resolution image with no metadata, unclear from the source "With the bands kinds permission on the Dutch leg of their 2012 European tour" whether this is the uploader's own work or not. January (talk) 11:35, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 15:42, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Photo of a photo, who's the author? Did he give permission? Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:38, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 15:42, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation, obviously photo was taken from [4] MBxd1 (talk) 11:57, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Photo commons.wik 3264 × 2098 pixels and photo web site 1000 × 643 pixels.--NGREU (talk) 15:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- This doesn't prove anything. The photo is the same. MBxd1 (talk) 18:06, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: It is more likely that the website took it from Commons given that the user has multiple other images of the same topic, there is exif-data and the quality is better. Basvb (talk) 15:44, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation, obviously photo was taken from [5] MBxd1 (talk) 11:59, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Photo commons.wik 3264 × 2448 pixels and photo web site 1087 × 699 pixels.--NGREU (talk) 15:13, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- This doesn't prove anything. The photo is the same. MBxd1 (talk) 18:05, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: More likely that they took it from Commons Basvb (talk) 15:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
dubious "own" work 37.5.2.252 11:59, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Own work unlikely Basvb (talk) 15:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
no permission 37.5.2.252 12:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 15:47, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Dubious "own" work (6 KB, no metadata) 37.5.2.252 12:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 15:47, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete A good search of the Flickr users photostream does not find this image. A similar artists impression of the building is found but is not free. Ww2censor (talk) 12:10, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 15:48, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Dubious "own" work (13 KB, no metadata) 37.5.2.252 12:29, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 15:48, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
no permission 37.5.2.252 12:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 15:48, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
This is a copyvio of MChS --> http://ria.ru/spravka/20130506/936074139.html N813PA (talk) 13:29, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 15:49, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
License tag is wrong - we still don't know what stance on copyright the Liberland project has. Anonimski (talk) 14:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 15:49, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
sajilantony Sajilantony (talk) 14:18, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Not in scope Basvb (talk) 15:50, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
© PPP Cell-BHU according to a larger version's caption. FDMS 4 15:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- @FDMS4: Hi! I got the note, not quite sure what it is about though. I helped fix this pic after it had been uploaded by another editor. That is as far as I've been involved. w.carter-Talk 17:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, but unfortunately there is no way (I'm aware of) to suppress the deletion gadget's notification to all user who have uploaded a revision of the nominated file. FDMS 4 18:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Could you please explain why this is nominated for deletion? Is the license wrong? --Educationtemple (talk) 18:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- This page doesn't say that it is copyright of PPP Cell BHU. It just says: Photo and News: PPP Cell BHU. It does not use the word copyright anywhere, then it is not appropriate to assume that it might have been the copyright of PP Cell BHU. Thanks --Educationtemple (talk) 18:25, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- I'd consider it highly unlikely that there has been an explicit transfer of copyrights between the PPP Cell BHU and the "Indian Scholars Congress" (assuming its behind the Flickr account, which is anything but proven). What if not the copyright holder could "Photo:" supposed to be standing for? Re "[if] needed, I will contact Lalji Singh or PPP Cell BHU and request them to send an email to WP": It is, please see COM:OTRS (not a Wikipedia equivalent) for the procedure. FDMS 4 21:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- @FDMS4: The editor Educationtemple who uploaded the file and suggested the emailing, has decided to retire from the Wiki project after a dispute on the Wikipedia. w.carter-Talk 07:30, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- I'd consider it highly unlikely that there has been an explicit transfer of copyrights between the PPP Cell BHU and the "Indian Scholars Congress" (assuming its behind the Flickr account, which is anything but proven). What if not the copyright holder could "Photo:" supposed to be standing for? Re "[if] needed, I will contact Lalji Singh or PPP Cell BHU and request them to send an email to WP": It is, please see COM:OTRS (not a Wikipedia equivalent) for the procedure. FDMS 4 21:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- This page doesn't say that it is copyright of PPP Cell BHU. It just says: Photo and News: PPP Cell BHU. It does not use the word copyright anywhere, then it is not appropriate to assume that it might have been the copyright of PP Cell BHU. Thanks --Educationtemple (talk) 18:25, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Could you please explain why this is nominated for deletion? Is the license wrong? --Educationtemple (talk) 18:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs permission Basvb (talk) 15:52, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Accidentally uploaded a duplicate of a previous upload, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pumila_novaceki.jpg Mr Fink (talk) 15:58, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: You can use a speedy deletion for this in future cases Basvb (talk) 15:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Vandal use images in ja.wikipedia.org. Also used for similar vandal deleted File:Yumenosuke is our savior.jpg.No other applications, image uploaded for vandal. 螺旋 (talk) 16:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Basvb (talk) 15:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Accidentally I've uploaded same photo second time (File:Ulica Wąska w Krakowie.jpg) Misiek2 (talk) 16:34, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: You can use speedy nominations for own work duplicates Basvb (talk) 15:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
If this is an official logo it is probably copyrighted. If it is not an official logo it is out of scope. MGA73 (talk) 16:53, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 15:54, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
No FOP in Indonesia. — Racconish 📥 17:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative of copyrighted work Basvb (talk) 15:54, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
No FOP in Indonesia — Racconish 📥 17:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative of copyrighted work Basvb (talk) 15:54, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Not acurate anymore. Breadbakersmansion (talk) 12:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: Not a reason to delete. This photo is dated and illustrates the subject as of creation date. -- Tuválkin ✉ 14:50, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 16:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
photo is not relevant anymore (my own work) Breadbakersmansion (talk) 00:15, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Not a reason to delete: Commons is not the uploader’s / creator’s / nominator’s free web hosting service; it having lost personal relevance in face of original intents when uploading is immaterial; this image stays as interesting and in scope as it was before. Nominator’s autorship is also irrelevant for a deletion request, the agreed license being irrevocable and the nature of the image and the history of previous deletion requests suggesting there are no grounds for a courtesy deletion. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept per above, no legitimate reason for deletion offered, previous kept, no evident problem, seems to illustrate relevant categories. -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Relies on a post-mortem period of author but lacks any information about the author. Also appears to be a copyright violation of Life magazine. Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:00, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Personally, I doubt the authorship this user. A similar image is found on the official website [6] royal family may come from them--Murza-Zade (talk) 04:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright status Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, см. http://www.chem.msu.ru/rus/chair/vms/welcome.html Dogad75 (talk) 19:03, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS needed Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thermidorimage (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Thermidorimage (talk · contribs)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom McZusatz (talk) 22:15, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
User page image for es:Usuario:Valentin estevanez navarro. No longer in use and so it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose and therefore out of scope for Commons. – Adrignola talk 15:20, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
out of scope... self promotional picture Jmvkrecords ⚜ Intra talk 21:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Keep Per COM:INUSE: An otherwise non-educational file does not acquire educational purpose solely because it is in use on a user page (the "User:" namespace) of another project, but by custom the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of another project is allowed --Discasto talk 15:22, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: only contribution from this user. No edits since 2011. Thus can be considered unused. McZusatz (talk) 22:12, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
getty images claims the copyright http://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/mehmet-talaat-pacha-turkish-minister-of-internal-nachrichtenfoto/112072799 37.5.2.252 07:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- I can only repeat the original license text when I uploaded the photo from LOC: "This is a press photograph from the George Grantham Bain collection, which was purchased by the Library of Congress in 1948. According to the library, there are no known restrictions on the use of these photos."
- Keep getty images claims the copyright is not a valid reason for deletion. Many people claim copyright for public domain works, called copyfraud. The laws apply to Gettyimages too. --Ras67 (talk) 11:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Looking at the source image at the LOC it looks like an image from another image. The other image has German typography in the upper right corner. Thus another (German) origin of the image is likely and it could well be that there is a mistake in the claims by the LOC in this case. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 15:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- It's a pseudo anonymous work for the Neue Photographische Gesellschaft, Getty has guaranteed no copyright to this image, what is Apic / contributor? Getty claims copyright for every old image in it's stock, regardless whether the image is in PD. --Ras67 (talk) 17:03, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Looking at the source image at the LOC it looks like an image from another image. The other image has German typography in the upper right corner. Thus another (German) origin of the image is likely and it could well be that there is a mistake in the claims by the LOC in this case. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 15:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Getty images has a substantial history of copyfraud, not sufficient reason to counter the (generally proper) LOC copyright listing. -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 15:31, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- There is an attribution at the bottom of the image, so I'm uncertain that the Flickr user can give a free licence. Ww2censor (talk) 11:58, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible. Yann (talk) 15:38, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- This image looks like a TV screenshot, so I am uncertain if the Flickr user can provide it under a free licence. I think the precautionary principle applies. Ww2censor (talk) 12:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:37, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
And also:
Only (one) userspace usage (which could be substed). FDMS 4 12:24, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:37, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Unknown copyright status – © Shirish Beri & Associates accoding to [1] [2], larger version published here and the copyright is unlikely to have been transferred to the "Indian Scholars Congress" (or the possible Flickrwashing account of the same name). FDMS 4 15:36, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- As long as appropriate copyright license is in place, as is verifiable we should not bother and start doing original research and assuming whether or not display of such copyright claim is legal or not. Why we should imagine that such copyright claim may have not been transferred to the claimant. The image can sustain here as for now. --Educationtemple (talk) 20:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Simply because only a small portion of content (re)publishers understand the implications of a free license, such as that you have to be the copyright holder if you want to release works under one. When there is significant doubt that its stated license is correct, the Commons file should be deleted, see our precautionary principle. Looking at the Flickr user's photostream the license claim hardly appears to be credible, and as there is more credible copyright information available online contradicting it, it should be considered void. FDMS 4 21:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:06, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
File is old and not updated over years — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.76.121.160 (talk • contribs) 2015-04-24T00:00:56 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:10, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
last of movement. Lantus (Diskussion) 17:45, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Redirect deleted. Yann (talk) 16:09, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
doesn't this fall under some category of copyright of the screen? otherwise wouldn't everyone be taking pictures of an actor on screen and posting it? Lady Lotus (talk) 13:37, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:08, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Promo shots uploaded by The Knutz (talk · contributions · Statistics) for pt:The Knutz (Brazilian band) in a row on 26.04.2015 which appear all be taken from official https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Knutz/117748044941412?sk=photos_stream. Examples:
- File:KNUTZ-WOODGOTHIC.jpg (per watermark a work by photographer "Ilka Reico") --> https://www.facebook.com/117748044941412/photos/pb.117748044941412.-2207520000.1430072836./519115888137957/?type=1&theater (2013)
- File:KNUTZ-LOGO.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/117748044941412/photos/pb.117748044941412.-2207520000.1430072834./635377653178446/?type=1&theater (03.2014)
- File:KNUTZ-MEMBERS-2.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/117748044941412/photos/pb.117748044941412.-2207520000.1430072946./490780947638118/?type=1&theater (2013)
- File:KNUTZ-MEMBERS-4.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/117748044941412/photos/pb.117748044941412.-2207520000.1430073401./273961572653391/?type=1&theater (2011), per album a work by photographer "Luana Azevedo"
- File:The Knutz photo - Music to die for.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/117748044941412/photos/pb.117748044941412.-2207520000.1430073401./149661155083434/?type=1&theater (2010)
- File:KNUTZ-HEAVEN-OUTSIDE-THE-MIRROR.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/117748044941412/photos/pb.117748044941412.-2207520000.1430073263./460884407294439/?type=3&theater (2013)
- etc.
Multiple permissions from the original photographers needed.
- File:The Knutz - In the beggining.jpg
- File:The Knutz photo - Music to die for.jpg
- File:KNUTZ-MEMBERS-4.jpg
- File:KNUTZ-BRISTOL.jpg
- File:KNUTZ-MEMBERS-3.jpg
- File:KNUTZ-COVER-ART.jpg
- File:KNUTZ-WOODGOTHIC.jpg
- File:KNUTZ-HEAVEN-OUTSIDE-THE-MIRROR.jpg
- File:KNUTZ-MEMBERS-2.jpg
- File:KNUTZ-LOGO.jpg
- File:KNUTZ-LIVE-THE FLEECE-BRISTOL-ENGLAND.jpg
- File:KNUTZ-GHOST-DANCE-PARTY-COVER.jpg
- File:KNUTZ-MEMBERS-1.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 18:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:14, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Simply (very very nearly) exact duplicate of image: Wikipedia-W-bold-in-square.svg ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 21:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Please replace and renominate. Yann (talk) 16:16, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Yann Why not an redirect? There are to much inclusions. ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 19:58, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Milicevic01 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: book cover Didym (talk) 21:49, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible. Yann (talk) 16:17, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
unused, super-framed, there are plenty of alternates Zoupan (talk) 23:55, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Quite good, can be cropped. Yann (talk) 16:18, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Relies on a post-mortem period of author but lacks any information about the author Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:25, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Relies on a post-mortem period of author but lacks any information about the author Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:10, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:25, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Relies on a post-mortem period of author but lacks any information about the author Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:11, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:25, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Relies on a post-mortem period of author but lacks any information about the author Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:25, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Relies on a post-mortem period of author but lacks any information about the author Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:26, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Relies on a post-mortem period of author but lacks any information about the author Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:18, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:26, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Caricatura rafael núñez.jpg
- File:Djahdl.JPG
- File:Escanear20.jpg
- File:Escanear0048.jpg
- File:Escanear0017.jpg
- File:Escanear0015.jpg
- File:Djkjdj.jpg
- File:Escanear0013.jpg
- File:Escanear0.jpg
- File:Escanear0018.jpg
- File:Escanear00.jpg
- File:Escanear9.jpg
- File:Escanear8.jpg
- File:Escanear11.jpg
- File:Escanear5.jpg
- File:Ggsjs.JPG
- File:Escanear4.jpg
- File:Escanear3.jpg
- File:Escanear6.jpg
- File:Escanear0021.jpg
- File:Escanear005.jpg
- File:Dhd.JPG
- File:Escanear0027.jpg
- File:Escanear0030.jpg
- File:Escanear0028.jpg
- File:Escanear0029.jpg
- File:Escanear0031.jpg
- File:San Luis discurso.jpg
- File:Teatro Club.jpg
- File:Voto.jpg
- File:Rafael Núñez jpg.JPG
- File:Cárcano.jpg
- File:Gdjs.JPG
- File:Xcb.JPG
- File:Xcs.JPG
- File:Xcc.JPG
- File:Núñez junto a su eposa.jpg
- File:Núñez junto al ferrocarril.jpg
- File:El Dr. Núñez desde el palco oficial.jpg
- File:Traslado del féretro del Dr. Núñez.jpg
- File:Fallecimiento del Dr. Núñez.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:La tumba cubierta de flores.JPG
- File:El dr. cafferata.JPG
- File:Ataúd en la cripta.JPG
- File:El dr. caballero.JPG
- File:Llegada del cortejo a san jerónimo.JPG
- File:El dr. cárcano.JPG
- File:El final de la calle colón.JPG
- File:Público en la plaza colón.JPG
- File:Paso del féretro por la catedral.JPG
- File:Llegada a la calle colón.JPG
- File:Marcha hacia la necrópolis.JPG
- File:El público espera en la catedral.JPG
- File:El público deja flores.JPG
- File:Flores en la tumba.JPG
- File:Sufragio 1918.JPG
- File:Caricatura Dr. Núñez.JPG
- File:Banquete.JPG
- File:Teatro Club.JPG
- File:Casa Dr. Gutiérrez.JPG
- File:Acto de Proclamación.JPG
- File:Llegada del Príncipe.JPG
- File:Desfile Militar.JPG
- File:Ministro de Hacienda.JPG
- File:Féretro.JPG
- File:Núñez junto al F.C.C..JPG
- File:Traslado del féretro.JPG
- File:El Dr. Núñez junto al Dr. Piñero.JPG
- File:Discurso del Dr. Cárcano.JPG
- File:Núñez en el palco oficial.JPG
- File:Núñez junto a su esposa en Palermo.JPG
- File:Gobernador rafael núñez.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination --Krd 11:27, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Contradictory licensing, has a custom licensing tag stating that it is PD on account of never having been published but also tagged {{PD-US-no notice}} (which requires publication). If it is unpublished it needs confirmation that the photographer died before 1945 per {{PD-US-unpublished}}. January (talk) 10:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:56, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
The uploader clearly did not create the original image Peacemaker67 (talk) 12:53, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Is necessary that the original author upload works to Commons? If the author is death? None of the description contains Own work claiming, but still needs proper authorship. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:40, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- The licensing information is clearly incorrect. The image is very unlikely to be out of copyright, as the author would have to have died 70 years ago. Peacemaker67 (talk) 23:55, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion and the subject died in 1964 so we cannot just assume that the painting is PD due to it's age. Natuur12 (talk) 17:57, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Erreur de téléchargement Andreal90 (talk) 15:30, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Je ne retrouve pas ce fichier sur ma page habituelle Wikimedia Commons et beaucoup d'erreurs de français dans le texte du à la traduction !
Deleted: Uploader requested Natuur12 (talk) 18:00, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lockon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?s=118016477b6c384fe34ad39ac614f996&p=93921140&postcount=54 Didym (talk) 21:46, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to assume that Universidad EAFIT commited copyfraud Natuur12 (talk) 17:59, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
unused, very blurred, there are plenty of high-quality images of the church found in the category Zoupan (talk) 23:59, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:59, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Substituted by File:Dukatenscheißer0.jpg and File:Dukatenscheißer1.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ogmios (talk • contribs) 2015-04-25T16:27:52 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:16, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
These pictures are derived works of the depicted pieces of art of the Jordan National Gallery of Fine Arts. Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in Jordan. We would need a permission from the respective artists through OTRS to keep these photographs.
- File:Z Old Lweibdeh Amman JO 38.jpg
- File:Z Old Lweibdeh Amman JO 41.jpg
- File:Z Old Lweibdeh Amman JO 44.jpg
AFBorchert (talk) 15:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Jordan has FOP. I Just posted Mardus about his last year, NO FOP in Jordan. This should be corrected asap.--Tarawneh (talk) 14:57, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Having read the discussion, I do not believe that Jordan has FOP, but in any case until we change the Jordanian entry at Commons:FOP, we must rely on it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:14, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Darat Al Funun
[edit]These are pictures of artwork in the gallery Darat Al Funun in Jordan. Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Jordan. Hence we would need either a proof that these pictures are in the public domain or a permission from the respective artists through OTRS.
- File:Amman Darat Al Funoun 1.jpg
- File:Darat Al Funun 048.JPG
- File:Darat Al Funun 049.JPG
- File:Darat Al Funun 051.JPG
- File:Darat Al Funun 052.JPG
- File:Darat Al Funun 054.JPG
- File:Darat Al Funun 055.JPG
- File:Darat Al Funun 056.JPG
- File:Darat Al Funun 057.JPG
- File:Darat Al Funun 058.JPG
- File:Darat Al Funun 059.JPG
- File:Darat Al Funun 060.JPG
- File:Darat Al Funun 061.JPG
- File:Darat Al Funun 062.JPG
- File:Darat Al Funun 063.JPG
- File:Darat Al Funun 064.JPG
- File:Darat Al Funun 68.JPG
- File:Darat Al Funun 69.JPG
- File:Darat Al Funun 70.JPG
- File:Z Darat Al Funoun Amman 1.jpg
AFBorchert (talk) 16:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Jordan has FOP. I Just posted Mardus about his last year, NO FOP in Jordan. This should be corrected asap. --Tarawneh (talk) 14:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Having read the discussion, I do not believe that Jordan has FOP, but in any case until we change the Jordanian entry at Commons:FOP, we must rely on it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:14, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Dar Al-Anda
[edit]These are pictures of artwork in the Jordan gallery Dar Al-Anda. Unfortunately, we have no freedom of panorama in Jordan. Hence we would need a proof that these artworks are in the public domain or a permission from the respective artists through OTRS to keep these photographs.
- File:Dar Al Anda Amman JO 23.JPG
- File:Dar Al Anda Amman JO 24.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 104.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 105.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 107.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 108.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 109.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 114.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 115.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 125.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 126.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 155.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 156.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 157.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 40.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 41.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 42.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 43.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 44.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 45.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 67.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 68.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 69.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 70.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 71.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 72.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 73.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 86.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 87.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 91.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 92.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 93.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 96.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 97.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 98.JPG
- File:DAR ALANDA, Amman 99.JPG
- File:Jabel Weibdeh Dar Anda.JPG
AFBorchert (talk) 16:10, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Actually Jordan has FOP. I Just posted Mardus about his last year, NO FOP in Jordan. This should be corrected asap. --Tarawneh (talk) 14:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Having read the discussion, I do not believe that Jordan has FOP, but in any case until we change the Jordanian entry at Commons:FOP, we must rely on it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:15, 24 May 2015 (UTC)