Jump to content

Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/04/01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 1st, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cristo_del_Petrolero.png Barranqueño 18:58, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:06, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ES UN ERROR CHUY LOPEZ 63 (talk) 17:18, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy closed: DR opened by mistake or vandalical. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:51, 7 March 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

aparecen mis datos en google imagenes a poner la palabra dalthack Dalthack 77 (talk) 00:38, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy closed. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:42, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

maik new phase MAIK GARCIA (talk) 17:18, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 18:37, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

雑誌のスキャン画像 http://blog-imgs-77.fc2.com/u/m/e/umetaiko072/sss_20150205183651bad.jpg 螺旋 (talk) 14:04, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 18:58, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.novacrystallis.com/2015/02/a-look-at-the-concept-art-behind-final-fantasy-xvs-modern-city/からの転載 螺旋 (talk) 14:07, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation JuTa 19:22, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not Ellen Pao, with sexually derogatory gesture Dai Pritchard (talk) 14:49, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The gesture is not in the least bit sexually derogatory. How offensive your misguided comment is. Portraying me as a common pervert and vandal. Pathetic, for someone that sits on their high-horse making sure facts are true you have failed to do any research on the gesture. It is merely the sign used in a common game among youths. http://www.circlegame.org/index.htm carltg9

@Carltg9: Why is this file named "File:EllenPao.jpg" with a description that says "Ellen Pao at Reddit headquarters" when that's not even remotely what it depicts? Why not "File:Circle game hand sign.jpg" with a description that gives info about the game and sign? INeverCry 03:34, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I see from w:List_of_school_pranks#Circle_game that this is listed as a prank/bullying tactic hand sign. The current name and description are inappropriate, and I can see why anyone would see it as something immature or derogatory. I think the response to this deletion request is out of line considering. You're not looking too credible at this point Carltg9. If you're here to play games, you'll find yourself blocked pretty quickly. I'm closing this as speedy keep in order to rename it without a redirect and change the description so as to avoid offense especially since Ellen Pao is widely known person. INeverCry 04:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of KamiasHA

[edit]

Based on the file format used, the quality of the images shown, and having similar upload patterns to other users, such as ForwardGWR, I have reason to believe that this user has taken screenshots of official Iglesia ni Cristo videos and posted them as their own work. --wL <speak·creatively> 05:30, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:00, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falta de parcialidade Arcanji (talk) 18:18, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Album cover. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 23:50, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: {{Speedy}} -- blatant copyvio, taken from TipAdvisor.com .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from YouTube Secondarywaltz (talk) 15:39, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copright violation JuTa 08:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gallery is blanked and the images were deleted as non free. Not needed. Reguyla (talk) 17:35, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: empty gallery. JuTa 07:08, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like it should be a category but was created accidentally as an article. Reguyla (talk) 17:38, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree; please delete it. As you surmised, I accidentally created it as an article (my bad--sorry!). Lambtron (talk) 17:51, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . JuTa 07:24, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

--Benutzerwunsch Kemuer (talk) 19:34, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . JuTa 07:45, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falta de parcialidade Arcanji (talk) 18:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:EugeneZelenko. JuTa 19:13, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use at this point in time, and out of scope, in my opinion. Please read Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful before challenging. Dontreader (talk) 03:03, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploaded by vandal user on es.wp Rastrojo (DES) 17:36, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 23:22, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hammou bakkass (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mhamzaayub (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:27, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:28, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 23:30, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - photo of a map/drawing that looks very new INeverCry 23:44, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - looks to be a scan or photo of an illustration - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 23:47, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agreed. Note that this uploader has uploaded many problem images. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:31, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:53, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Image à caractère personnel, sans valeur pédagogique. CRH (talk) 04:54, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:53, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Image à caractère personnel, sans valeur pédagogique. CRH (talk) 04:57, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Image à caractère personnel, sans valeur pédagogique. CRH (talk) 04:56, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:57, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Image à caractère personnel, sans valeur encyclopédique. CRH (talk) 04:58, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are a lot of photographs in this file. It looks like a newspaper publication. Lot of doubt about this being the work of a single author. Vera (talk) 22:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:31, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:38, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:29, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

most likely screenshot from youtube or c&p from anywhere. Has appeared before being uploaded to commons in http://www.tt.com/sport/fussball/9821919-91/abbruch-in-montenegro-russlands-keeper-von-bengalo-verletzt.csp (here as screenshot from youtube) or http://www.bild.de/sport/fussball/igor-akinfeev/torwart-von-pyro-getroffen-spielabbruch-russland-montenegro-40336040.bild.html (as "Foto: Sky"). Colours are not identical, but the shapes. → «« Man77 »» [de] 22:39, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:29, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anujverma3194 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:40, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company INeverCry 22:41, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

supposedly copied from http://news.sportbox.ru/Vidy_sporta/Futbol/euro_cup/spbnews_NI526866_Sbornaja_Rossii_Privychno_trudnyje_rody«« Man77 »» [de] 22:44, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Delafrz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Going by upload descriptions, appears to be attempted publicity for sitar and tambour maker. Blurb in Persian translates (via Google) as "Create professional sitar and tambour [name redacted]" followed by contact details.

Many images are so watermarked as to be useless for general Commons' purposes. Other ones are still bordering on not useful with writing on top of them and lack of meaningful description. It *might* be worth keeping some...?

Ubcule (talk) 22:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 22:47, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer used personal image. Was previously in use at en:User:Mdakramsk, but this was misuse of Wikipedia for personal purposes by non-contributor, so page blanked. Ubcule (talk) 22:52, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does the uploader have permission from the claimed (and watermarked) photographer to license this for free use? Ubcule (talk) 22:54, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:57, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Matiia (talk) 22:58, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:58, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Matiia (talk) 22:59, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, presumably of uploader. Ubcule (talk) 23:01, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant spam. Ubcule (talk) 23:05, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value due to very low quality INeverCry 23:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arpico Latex Foam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Account clearly being used for promotional purposes. While this isn't necessarily 100% at odds with Commons' aim, a lot of these are clearly out of scope (e.g. logos) or very low resolution. At least one of them appears to be a copyvio of a stock photograph (see below). Whether this warrants any of the rest being deleted is open to question.

Ubcule (talk) 23:08, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and/or spam. Ubcule (talk) 23:11, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:20, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant Spam. Ubcule (talk) 23:11, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant spam. Ubcule (talk) 23:12, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and/or spam. Ubcule (talk) 23:12, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant spam. Ubcule (talk) 23:13, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality unused cropped duplicate of File:حمدى بك الهوارى.jpg INeverCry 23:18, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright protected image Abhilashkrishn (talk) 23:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Movie screenshot from this page which says: "all pictures can be used without restrictions." But in a bottom of the page we can see: "All rights reserved." Juggler2005 (talk) 00:39, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - image taken from this site FOX 52 (talk) 00:58, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

uploader does not seem to have any permission (OTRS) from the photographer - FOX 52 (talk) 01:03, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer József Pécsi died in 1956 thus this photo is currently under copyright and not public domain. Norden1990 (talk) 01:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:52, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 03:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 01:43, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted. INeverCry 00:50, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ignis.jpgと同一 螺旋 (talk) 01:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage material, out of scope Motopark (talk) 02:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe that Marco Rambaldi took this picture, based on this image's information: https://www.facebook.com/joebarbieri.official/photos/pb.35162833950.-2207520000.1427858015./10152767914858951/?type=3&theater The problem is that we don't know that he authorized the release of the picture under a free license. Per favore, e' necessario ottenere il permesso formale di Marco Rambaldi. E' facile. Grazie. Dontreader (talk) 03:29, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is a fairly unique design and Tomorrowworld is the copyright holder. It is not, as the uploader claims, "own work" (Dutch: "eigen werk"). ErikvanB (talk) 04:00, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Onclantoine (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted book cover pictures

Motopark (talk) 04:12, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 04:29, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jackson290858 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Found elsewhere on Internet, unlikely own work

UAwiki (talk) 04:32, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A logo of non-notable private education institution, uploaded for advertising. IRTC1015 (talk) 06:17, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

JPEG version of File:GPCR in membrane.png Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 06:22, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file of no use to Commons. OSX (talkcontributions) 07:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file of no use to Commons. OSX (talkcontributions) 07:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal drawing of no use to Commons. OSX (talkcontributions) 07:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file of no use to Commons. OSX (talkcontributions) 07:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file of no use to Commons. OSX (talkcontributions) 07:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file of no use to Commons. OSX (talkcontributions) 07:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file of no use to Commons. OSX (talkcontributions) 07:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, no description. Likely out of scope. Ankry (talk) 07:22, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of scope. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of scope, should be converted to wikitext if notable Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:10, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Why it should be deleted ?

this temple is in existence for the past 15 years since 11th March 2001 in Chennai as per published newspaper reports and television coverage AND YOUTUBE VIDEOS already listed. and photos that have been presented to you. Your representative can personally visit the temple site address at: PALAYATHAMMAN CRICKET GANESHA TEMPLE, ON NEW AAVADI ROAD, NEXT TO RTO (ANNAI SATHYA NAGAR), ANNA NAGAR EAST, CHENNAI - 600 102, TAMILNADU STATE, INDIA. This is a sports temple known to the whole world since 11th March 2001, the date of its creation.

If you google on "CRICKET GANESHA TEMPLE" OR "palayathamman cricket ganesha temple", you will get various sources for confirmation. The media come to this temple for video shoots. We don't solicit any publicity.If your organization is covering important facts and sports temples, this should be the ideal one to be published in your website. Otherwise, tell me why not ...You can't delete anything at somebody's instance..It won't create any trouble. It is there for 15 years. I have represented it again in wiki format. pls do consider quickly. You can also upload my photos as may be appropriate for your article. I have uploaded all photos already for your consideration. You can talk to me directly on the following mobile No: (Removed inappropriate personal information)

K.R.Ramakrishnan Founder Cricket Ganesh Temple Chennai, INDIA. Date: 2nd April 2015 Mobile No: (Removed inappropriate personal information) (for clarifications if any)

Please see Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. If you believe this temple is notable, please create an article about it on Wikipedia. This is out of Commons' scope. Thank you. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:07, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to be a screengrab from https://vimeo.com/22942030 -- Deadstar (msg) 10:16, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like screengrab from https://vimeo.com/22949795 -- Deadstar (msg) 10:17, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screengrab from https://vimeo.com/22966065 (1:25)-- Deadstar (msg) 10:19, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of sope: Unused logo without any indication of what it stands for. A Google image search didn't yield any enlightening results either (but at least it doesn't seem to be a copyright violation). El Grafo (talk) 11:39, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal image with a web adress written over it → out of scope. El Grafo (talk) 11:41, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

de:Benutzer:Flomar BBB Nr6/BBB Blaue Burrrka Buben; no further use WolfgangRieger (talk) 12:23, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? The file has derivative work file:Michel Mohrt redux.jpg. Taivo (talk) 13:49, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart. Should be in SVG. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused plot. Should be in SVG. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability and copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart which should be in SVG. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: text document which should be replaced with wiki-table. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Notice violations, Korea copyright laws violation Ysjbserver (talk) 15:16, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Versehentlich hochgeladen, bitte löschen KHWE2015 (talk) 15:53, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture appears in various sites and there's no OTRS approval for its release Ldorfman (talk) 17:47, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:00, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Presa sport (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images are almost all lowish resolution, a very high proportion have watermarks indicating multiple sources with no obvious (or specified) connection to uploader. Although Google search doesn't come up with matches for all, these are very suspicious. I would assume some or all are copyright violations that don't belong to the uploader.

(The football club logos probably fall above threshold of originality- bear in mind these also have to be free under Romanian law as as well, assuming they're Romanian, but the relevant article doesn't explain Romanian law with respect to that.

Google Romanian translation: (Imaginile sunt aproape toate rezoluție lowish, un procent foarte mare si filigrane indică mai multe surse care nu au legătură evidentă (sau specificat) pentru încărcare. Deși căutare Google nu vine cu meciuri pentru toate, acestea sunt foarte suspicios. Mi-ar asuma o parte sau toate sunt încălcări drepturilor de autor care nu fac parte din încărcat. (Probabil Logo-urile Club de fotbal cădea peste pragul de urs originalitate în minte acestea au, de asemenea, să fie liber în conformitate cu legislația română ca la fel de bine, presupunând că sunt român, dar articolul relevant nu explică legea română cu privire la acest lucru.)

Ubcule (talk) 18:23, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:00, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? This is the uploader's only contribution.

Это рутинное заявление на маленькой фотографии без EXIF-данных. Является ли загрузчик действительно фотографом? Почему фотография такая маленькая? Можете ли загрузить эту фотографию с большими размерами, например, 2000×1500 пикселов? Можете ли загрузить эту фотографию с EXIF-данными? Taivo (talk) 18:28, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:58, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misuse of Commons for solely personal purposes. Although this had been used at en:User:Balram Rajput, user's only contribution there was to edit his user page, i.e. misused as personal web space. That has now been blanked, and this photo (user's only upload) should be deleted for same reason. Ubcule (talk) 18:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dsisamson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spam, out of scope. These are user's two remaining uploads from original three.

Ubcule (talk) 18:32, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie (personal image). Ubcule (talk) 18:59, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:56, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie (personal image). Ubcule (talk) 18:59, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:56, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Helenelarrive (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out-of-scope spam uploads. ("Ajouts hors du champ de mails.")

Ubcule (talk) 19:00, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:56, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 19:03, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:55, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manju9118 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Either copyvios of pre-existing clipart, or out-of-scope logos.

Ubcule (talk) 19:10, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:55, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam and/or out of scope Ubcule (talk) 19:12, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 19:12, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tjygsb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional selfies, i.e. out of scope personal images and/or spam.

Ubcule (talk) 19:13, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nikolajk00 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The larger of the two images (File:ЕКр1 (Тарпан).jpg) gives an arbitrary URL as the source with no indication of permission or ownership. The smaller image is a crop of the larger one, and contradicts the "own work" claim, unless the first really was his/her own work...?

Google Russian translation: (Больше двух изображений дает произвольное URL в качестве источника без указания разрешения или права собственности.Меньше изображение урожай в большую, и противоречит претензии "собственная работа", если первый по-настоящему не был его / ее собственная работа ...?)

Ubcule (talk) 19:17, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:51, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private snapshot -> out of scope. JuTa 19:17, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:49, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 空空035 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out-of-scope spam uploads (see descriptions).

Ubcule (talk) 19:19, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:49, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The painter de:Elisabeth Büchsel died only in 1957. Artsfriends (talk) 19:49, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:45, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most probably copyrighted logo Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 20:20, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joseico23 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, missing or inconsistent EXIF data, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 20:21, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:41, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author listed in the metadata information is different from the supposed author. Secondly, the link provided doesn't state that the image has been licensed under creative commons attribution 3.0 Versace1608 (talk) 21:21, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:40, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

presumably grabbed from the web: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=121609786 Albinfo (talk) 21:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grabbed from the web: http://facegram.io/im/search/910898195440577683_234099586 Albinfo (talk) 21:27, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grabbed from the web: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=121609786 Albinfo (talk) 21:28, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grabbed from the web - published e.g. here in 2011: http://www.mycity-military.com/Artiljerija-municija-i-protivoklopna-sredstva/Kineski-VBR-107mm-i-upotreba-na-prostoru-bivse-SFRJ_2.html Albinfo (talk) 21:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.facebook.com/iamzahwa http://www.galafemmeafricaine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/nominees_ecrivains_zahwadjennad.png Lacrymocéphale (talk) 21:46, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As noted in the file description, this design is by Wim van Woerkom. This image infringes on the copyright belong to the artist and cannot be kept on Commons without a license from him. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nicoff is not the creator of this work, but he has only scanned it. Not old enough (1959) for PD. Ras67 (talk) 16:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This a profesional photo, certainly no "selfie" Eingangskontrolle (talk) 16:29, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No "own work", wrong license + copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 16:34, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About the same attitude toward Wikimedia work as her ridiclously over-worded, long-winded, trivia-jammed article on enWP. Embarrassing for her when she was alive and to her memory now that she's died. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:47, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Elephant photo is copyrighted photo on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/nidhingpoothully/434837079/ and File:Lion zoo antwerp 1280.jpg is deleted from Commons. Smooth_O (talk) 18:27, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Okay, if the Antwerp Zoo Lion picture has been deleted from Commons. On the other hand, the elephant photo was most definitely under a Commons-compatible licence back when I used it for this collage. Correct me if I'm wrong, but once granted, Creative Commons licences are non-revocable even if the photographer later changes his mind, right? --Leptictidium (talk) 18:50, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It may have OTRS permission, but it's still out of scope as far as I can tell. Ubcule (talk) 18:36, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of scope? Ubcule (talk) 18:43, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  KeepIn my opinion the project's scope should include both potentially historic images, and sufficient images of items and events that seem mundane. I've written about this before, the surprising lecture I attended decades ago, that opened my mind to the importance of documenting the mundane. The lecturer was a historian, who explained that we knew practically nothing about the lives of ordinary individuals, during the middle ages, as they seemed so ubiquitous, so mundane, no one ever wrote down how they ate, how they dressed, how they lived their lives. However, he had come across a cache of documents. Transcripts from the interrogation sessions when the Inquisition tried to root out a heresy in a rural region. The inquisitors had gone through every detail of the villagers life, in painstaking detail. And, because, uniquely, the inquisitors had recorded the villager's lives in such detail, historian had a better idea of whether the average peasant ever traveled more than five miles from where he or she was born, whether he or she was faithful to their wives, etc.

    In this particular instance we seem to have less than half a dozen images of that rite of passage -- a child's first haircut. That is far from excessive, and the event is, I suggest, in scope. Geo Swan (talk) 16:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boy meets barber.JPG
File:One-year-old gets first haircut IMG 5764.JPG
 I withdraw my nomination Fair point, if it's not something we have a glut of. Ubcule (talk) 18:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:06, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 19:58, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 20:01, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 20:01, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 20:02, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 20:05, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 20:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chalkboardstyle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 20:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Civika (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 20:12, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Norman Munyendo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 20:13, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 20:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 20:15, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mdnghtluv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 20:16, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 20:17, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 20:17, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tempole (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 20:20, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of Soviet artwork, no FoP for sculpture in Russia. A.Savin 20:43, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of Soviet artwork, no FoP for sculpture in Russia. A.Savin 20:44, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Toropchin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 22:28, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No valid UK tag is given; the author is given as Wayne Ray, which is presumably the uploader rather than the photographer involved in the original postcard. No date of death is given for the original photographer to support a life+70 claim. Hchc2009 (talk) 22:34, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(keep)It is part of my Photographic Archives collection. It was in a group of photographs which were from the early 1940's that were donated to me. It's a bloody postcard from the early 1900's?? Post cards are out in the public view all the time. Are you going through all of them on Commons? I can see if it was his original negatives or photos but a published postcard?? WayneRay (talk) 17:15, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There are plenty of images etc. from the early 1900s which are still in copyright in the UK, which is why a valid UK tag is required on images that are uploaded on the Commons. Being used on a postcard doesn't place an image in the Public Domain. Hchc2009 (talk) 17:26, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mtcs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 22:40, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

one of the source images was deleted as copyright violation, so at least this image must be removed Didym (talk) 22:42, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Omarion503 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 22:44, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused transparent svg Didym (talk) 22:46, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Coat of arms (brasão) and flag (bandeira) of Brazilian municipality pt:Muitos Capões emancipated in 1995 (see also http://www.muitoscapoes.rs.cnm.org.br/portal1/municipio/historia.asp?iIdMun=100143249 / IBGE), failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) published or commissioned (...) prior to 1983." No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law. See also (as a working example) File:BrasaoValparaiso.png.

Gunnex (talk) 22:58, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

to bad quality to be of any use WvB77 (talk) 23:27, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is missing evidence of permission. Attempts to tag image as such have been repeatedly reverted. No evidence provided that the uploader took the photo and/or is the copyright owner of the photo. Geniac (talk) 02:05, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete without proper documentation we can't use this image. Dman41689 (talk) 21:52, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Since when do we assume bad faith? There is nothing exceptional about this photo and it belongs to a set of images by the same user of the same type. It isn't professionally shot or anything out of the ordinary, will I need to start providing evidence of every single image I take myself in the future? CFCF (talk) 11:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 13:40, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The description of the photo on flickr says
Português: Foto de Annie Zannetti
English: Photo by Annie Zannetti
I don´t think that flickr´s uploader has the rights about this photo. Rodrigolopes (talk) 02:41, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating:


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ErikvanB as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is a university logo and not own work Effectivelly not own work and the uploader is a blocked user, but bellow the COM:TOO. Amitie 10g (talk) 04:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. Yes, perhaps COM:TOO, but the problem is that the uploader has repeatedly issued licenses pretending to be the maker (making the license invalid in my opinion) and never responds to nominations or warnings. Here is another one, dated the 4th of March, but uploaded today. ErikvanB (talk) 21:38, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The user has been cautioned about his uploads to Commons by an admin on his talk page on nl-wiki. ErikvanB (talk) 21:42, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Below the TOO. A simple change to {{PD-textlogo}} should be enough. Fma12 (talk) 01:45, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 13:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Restulm.jpgと同一。 トレーラーのSS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HvgPzpbLhM 螺旋 (talk) 04:07, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not own work, no permission. Yann (talk) 13:44, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dutlicate file already in commons here File:Machine Gun Kelly.jpg we don't need 2 of them Dman41689 (talk) 19:47, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and copyvio: not properly credited. Yann (talk) 13:49, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 20:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I do not see a reason clear so that the image should be deleted. Roberto Mateos is an actor recognized in the world of soap operas. I hope that there is another more compelling reason for this image to be deleted.
Spanish, No veo un motivo claro para que la imagen sea eliminada, Roberto Mateos es un actor reconocido en el mundo de las telenovelas. Espero que haya un motivo más convincente para que la imagen sea eliminada.--Philip J Fry (talk) 13:30, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 13:50, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. See talk page. Please add a license, and send a permission. See COM:OTRS for details. Yann (talk) 20:38, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Still no license or permission. Yann (talk) 13:50, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo soumise à droit de diffusion. Photo obsolète. Personnel ayant quitté l'entreprise ne souhaitant plus être liée à l'entreprise. Mktbt (talk) 20:47, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Poor quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 13:51, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo obsolète. Diffusion non autorisée en 2009. Fichier privatif à l'entreprise. Mktbt (talk) 20:49, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Too simple to be under copyright. Moreover, it does not need to be the latest version to be hosted at Commons. Fma12 (talk) 01:44, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use, PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 13:51, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Again, doubtful to be own work, and also see the discussion on Commons:Deletion requests/File:LogoVivesMiguelVerkleind.png and the other nominations for deletion so far on User talk:~Miguel~2000~Teirlinck~ ErikvanB (talk) 21:44, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use, PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 13:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly uses non-free logo Achowat (talk) 06:12, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Maserati ? Fma12 (talk) 01:41, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it's a pretty standard barnstar with the Maserati logo just slapped on top. Achowat (talk) 19:13, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So I vote  Delete because the Maserati logo is above the TOO. Fma12 (talk) 14:03, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Same. I vote  Delete and I marked it as a copyvio and is eligible for ***speedy deletion***.

Deleted: . Krd 11:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artistic type photo but i believe this is out of scope. No educational value as the subject cant be identified Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion Krd 11:11, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Le fichier n'est pas utilisable à des fins éducatives. Sont inclus dans cette catégorie par exemple : Les collections de photos privées - par exemple une photo de vous-même ou de vos amis. Il existe beaucoup d'autres sites sur Internet qui peuvent être utilisés pour héberger vos photos, par exemple Flickr. De telles collections de photos privées ne peuvent pas acquérir un caractère éducatif même si elles sont affichées dans une galerie sur votre page utilisateur Commons ou ailleurs. Thomas1313 (talk) 01:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope, per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:16, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by P199 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Recreation of content previously deleted, see here.
Not the same image, but a possible copyvio as this is small with no EXIF and own work is doubtful since the subject appears to be looking at somebody as they take the photo INeverCry 07:36, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope, per nom. --Krd 11:09, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it any more Subhimasri (talk) 08:08, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Krd 11:10, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CB_building.jpgと同一、グーグルストリートビュー 螺旋 (talk) 14:41, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete As indicated by nom. grabbed from Google Street View. Gunnex (talk) 20:26, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion Krd 11:09, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake logo, there's no references that it was the Partido Nacional logo in 1969 Sfs90 (talk) 20:50, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 21:49, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the given license {{PD-old-70-1923}} seems not to be correct. Its published 1923 and has an unknown author. It might be public domain by other reasons. JuTa 19:29, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

so do not delete--Martin wolf (talk) 22:03, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The fact that is might be PD is not helpful here -- it must be proven beyond a significant doubt. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:13, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mise à jour du logo Saidacha971 (talk) 22:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid reason for deleting. When can have old and new versions. Pleclown (talk) 11:15, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hglmz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 19:17, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 01:26, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hglmz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:58, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, per previous discussion. Additionally:
-- Tuválkin 07:04, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Pleclown (talk) 11:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Page was blanked as an abusive redirect. Not needed. Reguyla (talk) 17:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep I am by no means an expert on taxonomy, but it seems to me that this page, which was created in 2004, is useful, albeit only marginally so, and in no way abusive. Before the blanking, it redirected "Nyctiprogne" to "Chordeilinae", the subfamily which contains Nyctiprogne. Since we have no gallery for Nyctiprogne, that seems to me appropriate.
The page was blanked out of process by User:PurpleHz. I have added back the redirect. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:17, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete It is a taxon name and it has to host a gallery about said genus (of birds). The redirect is of no value in helping to find an image in relation with the genus Nyctiprogne, and is misleading as someone could think that "Nyctiprogne" is a synonym of "Chordeilinae". As of now, the only thing it provides is a blue link which is problematic for people (like me) who watch out the upload of new images throught 'Special:RecentChangesLinked' (see my page: User:PurpleHz/Articles sans image). SO, no reason to keep that page. Regards. PurpleHz (talk) 11:29, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You say:
"The redirect is of no value in helping to find an image in relation with the genus Nyctiprogne"
I disagree strongly. If someone is looking for images of Nyctiprogne, which we don't have, the redirect to the parent makes that very clear. Experienced users find their way around Commons with ease, but we need to remember that Commons is not here for us, it is here for the inexperienced user who needs a particular image. Anything that helps them find their way through our more than 25 million images is to be valued, not discarded.
You also say:
"is misleading as someone could think that "Nyctiprogne" is a synonym of "Chordeilinae""
Not if they can read. "Nyctiprogne" is listed as a genus of "Chordeilinae" at Chordeilinae. The fact that is is a red link makes it clear that we have no images of Nyctiprogne.
.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You wrote:
"The fact that is is a red link makes it clear that we have no images of Nyctiprogne."
You are contradicting yourself here. The category link is red, that's ok, but the gallery link is blue and there is no media of Nyctiprogne available, so that's quite misleading. As you said, the value the red link is to inform people that there is no media available, so why keep that one blue? Of the thousands of bird species which don't have a media available yet on Commons, this one is the only one to be blue (gallery or category). Regards, PurpleHz (talk) 16:32, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Hello Reguyla and User:PurpleHz. We do not create temporary redirects. As this taxon is a valid genus it must either exist and contain a gallery or be deleted.
On wikicommons, in biology pages, redirect mean synonymy or invalidity, not "not yet created because media are missing". Can you imagine how many pages/categories we would have to create ? There are millions of taxons for which we will never have a media.
By the way we don't blank on wikicommons. Just add {{Speedy}}. Cheers Liné1 (talk) 20:57, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Jim. The redirect has been there for more than 10 years. We don't know if any external websites rely on this redirect, but deleting it will only result on broken links elsewhere. Green Giant (talk) 16:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]