Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/08/17
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
190.104.171.7 20:28, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: accident? no reason given and I can't see any reason to delete this file. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:16, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
This is a logo, and not the uploaders own work Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:37, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-trivial logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims. Appears to be a scan from a newspaper (note the raster). —LX (talk, contribs) 02:01, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Per a similar instance here, as well other of the user's past contributions, which all appear to be invalid. It is doubtful that this is the user's own work, and thus, not free. Their source also does not help to validate their claim. Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:33, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Imho, too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}. BrightRaven (talk) 08:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Own work is unlikely. BrightRaven (talk) 09:24, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
For what it's worth, it's in my own possession of their memorabilia that wasn't already donated to the William R. Downs Papers at Georgetown, but I understand entirely.
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Doubt about authorship, as this page containing the same photo was uploaded already in 2011. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:27, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
A portrait of the uploader? 24.134.91.195 12:35, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Delete, out of COM:SCOPE. --Túrelio (talk) 13:11, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Reproduction of art postcard, claimed as own work. Original sculpture by Abanindranath Tagore (d. 1951), may or may not be in the PD already. Unclear who has shot the original photo of the sculpture. As it's a photo of a 3-dimensional work, it might still be copyrighted. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:19, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Psychonaut as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of a 2006 mural situated inside a chapel. Poland's freedom of panorama does not extend to works displayed indoors.
Converted by me to DR, as depicted had died around year 1200, whereby the original image might be PD already. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:33, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- The style of the artwork is cleary modern rather than medieval. In fact, the artist has signed and dated their work, dating the mural to the year 2006. —Psychonaut (talk)
- O.k., hadn't seen that. Delete. --Túrelio (talk) 20:23, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- O.k., hadn't seen that.
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Arguable spam, no plausible in-scope use. (I speak little Spanish, but I can make sense of enough of it to see that it doesn't counteract my former assertion!) Ubcule (talk) 14:41, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Essay, probably out of scope as image. Some/all of user's other images are spam and/or out-of-scope. Can someone who knows Spanish better please confirm that this should- or shouldn't- be deleted? Thanks. Ubcule (talk) 14:46, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Essay, probably out of scope as image. Some/all of user's other images are spam and/or out-of-scope. Can someone who knows Spanish better please confirm that this should- or shouldn't- be deleted? Thanks. Ubcule (talk) 14:46, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Apparent self-promoted quote (uploader has name attributed to it). Source of central photo is also unclear. Ubcule (talk) 14:48, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope as far as Commons is concerned, not used on user pages either. Ubcule (talk) 15:34, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Corporate logo, not work of uploader. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:54, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
This was created in 2007 for Karjalan Liitto ry [1] and was never the official symbol of Ruskeala. It is not covered by {{PD-Coa-Finland}} and is too recent to be PD by age. Jafeluv (talk) 16:22, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
This was created in 2004 for Karjalan Liitto ry [2] and was never the official symbol of Räisälä. It is not covered by {{PD-Coa-Finland}} and is too recent to be PD by age. Jafeluv (talk) 16:24, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Complex logo, TOO concern. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:27, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
This is a software screenshot Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:31, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
The is a logo, and unlikely to be uploaders own work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:27, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
This is logo artwork, and I have a Threshold of originality concern... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:30, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
© CarmelH All Right Reserved. Rillke(q?) 18:59, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Upload date there was 2010-03-20 // at Commons, it was uploaded on 30 May 2013 -- Rillke(q?) 19:02, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
The person is not notable enough. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:05, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, private image. Aftab1995 (talk) 19:10, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, private image Aftab1995 (talk) 19:11, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation: see https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.496843633697166.1073741832.117778548270345&type=1 Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:16, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
poor quality image serving no reasonable educational purpose, out of scope —SpacemanSpiff 19:23, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio from [3]. Picture was available online at least months before upoladed here [4]. There are more dubious uploads from the same user. Sitacuisses (talk) 19:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio from [5] (published in 2009). "© Knut Vahlensieck _ Ruhr Nachrichten 2006". Another dubious upload from User:DerComputerNoob. Sitacuisses (talk) 19:37, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:22, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, due to low resolution, unencyclopedic mask and missing information about consent. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:28, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, due to low resolution, unencyclopedic mask and watermark and missing information about consent. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:29, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
during last upload this was not own work (see Special:Undelete/File:JPK1.jpg admin link only) JuTa 22:07, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Arijana Rina Tomić.jpg Tomislav Tomić (talk) 19:31, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Keep No reason given. Flickrworker (talk) 21:11, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Actually, unused personal photo, not the best quality and if the uploader himself nominates ... Taivo (talk) 15:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Arijana Rina Tomić Tomislav Tomić (talk) 19:32, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: no reason given. (Also multiple deletion requests for the same image: Troll, vandal, clueless?) -- Tuválkin ✉ 04:49, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Arijana Rina Tomić Tomislav Tomić (talk) 19:36, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: no reason given. (Also multiple deletion requests for the same image: Troll, vandal, clueless?) -- Tuválkin ✉ 04:49, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal picture Lymantria (talk) 12:25, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
arijana tomić Tomislav Tomić (talk) 19:29, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: no reason given. (Also multiple deletion requests for the same image: Troll, vandal, clueless?) -- Tuválkin ✉ 04:49, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Image unused. It depicts a person, which might not be subject of any public interest and as such not be relevant for Wikimedia. Possibly uploaded without knowing the consequences. Deletion request has been submitted by the uploader [6]. Shaqspeare (talk) 14:00, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- I agree that this seems to be a non-notable person (in spite of categorization as press editor — input from someone knowledgeable about the Croatian mediascape sought!), and that the poses may be borderline unflattering. However we cannot be sure if the uploader made the DR intentionally, as reason stated is just the name of the person depicted (as a signature?). Maybe this is a case of a disgruntled hubbie uploading private pictures; the victim then catches his session open and tries to have them deleted — hence the repeated DRs. Cannot be sure — better close these two DRs as malformed and open a new one for all four images, based on non-notability? -- Tuválkin ✉ 15:25, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Actually, unused personal photo, not the best quality and if the uploader himself nominates ... Taivo (talk) 15:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal picture Lymantria (talk) 12:24, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Arijana Tomić Tomislav Tomić (talk) 19:34, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: no reason given. (Also multiple deletion requests for the same image: Troll, vandal, clueless?) -- Tuválkin ✉ 04:49, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Actually, unused personal photo, not the best quality and if the uploader himself nominates ... Taivo (talk) 15:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Arijan Tomić Tomislav Tomić (talk) 19:37, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: no reason given. (Also multiple deletion requests for the same image: Troll, vandal, clueless?) -- Tuválkin ✉ 04:49, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal picture Lymantria (talk) 12:25, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
For the moment it seems to be a fair use file. Propose deletion until OGL can be established. SonofSetanta (talk) 15:57, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not a valid OTRS ticket, non free image Ezarateesteban 16:39, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ubcule as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Only used for declined "article for creation" over two months back Out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:24, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ezarateesteban 17:12, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
The source page listed claims "© All Rights Reserved by Qypchak". There's no indication I can see that it's released under cc-by-sa. – Quadell (talk) 22:46, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Qypchak is my user's name. That's my photo, including Panoramio's image--Qypchak (talk) 08:17, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
- Here's the history, from what I can tell. Qypchak first uploaded this photo to Commons in December of 2007. At the time it was claimed PD-release. Then in March of 2011, he uploaded the same image to Panoramio with the statement "All Rights Reserved by Qypchak". In October of 2011 he changed the license here at Commons to cc-by-sa. Finally, in the last few days, he changed the license at Panoramio to cc-by-nc-nd. This is certainly complicated. – Quadell (talk) 14:41, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: The owner of the copyright may upload the photo in differents sites under differents licenses. So the license here is true Ezarateesteban 17:17, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
existe una nueva version de la fotografia Samycot (talk) 16:39, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request, not in use Ezarateesteban 17:02, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ubcule as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Apparently out-of-scope personal image, minimalist description gives no indication otherwise. Not used on personal page either. INeverCry 17:51, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: personal photo, out of scope Ezarateesteban 17:09, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Probably *not* a copyvio due to being "simple text", but no clear evidence for being in-scope either. Ubcule (talk) 15:43, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not in use, out of scope Ezarateesteban 16:37, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Unclear if this is in-scope and/or a copyright violation? (Google translation: No queda claro si esto es en el alcance y / o una violación de derechos de autor?) Ubcule (talk) 15:38, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not in use, unclear educational purpose Ezarateesteban 16:36, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Superseded by File:Flag of South Korea.svg. It's just a extracted version from the SVG file. – Kwj2772 (msg) 16:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate file Ezarateesteban 17:04, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Definitely non-free. Please see Commons:Deletion policy#Non-free licenses and fair use and Commons:Fair use. Rezonansowy (talk) 15:57, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation Ezarateesteban 16:40, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
This is copyright charcter, and not the uploaders own work as claimed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:10, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation Ezarateesteban 16:41, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Isn't that out of scope? JuTa 16:46, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not in use, who is that person? Ezarateesteban 17:05, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
The file is a duplicate of File:Karte der Reichstagswahlen 1907.svg and there is nothing new in it. Furfur (talk) 16:50, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate file Ezarateesteban 17:06, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Converting to a DR a non standard request made on file talk page which reads:- "This image was intended for a Wikipedia article about Kate Branch, and as the article could not be created, she wants the image deleted. A speedy delete would be appreciated. Thank you." the request was made by an ip KTo288 (talk) 09:03, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Converting to a DR a non standard request made on file talk page reads, This image was intended for a Wikipedia article about Kate Branch, and as the article could not be created, she wants the image deleted. A speedy delete would be appreciated. Thank you., the request was made by an ip 124.170.241.50 21:51, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: As it stands at the moment, the person is not "notable" per the standards on English Wikipedia, and the person is asking for it to be deleted. Instead of getting into COM:IDENT and asking whether consent to publish was granted (being in a private place, etc), let's delete this photo, particularly as it is not in use. russavia (talk) 04:53, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
unused user pic 91.64.241.51 17:41, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ezarateesteban 17:08, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
unused user pic 91.64.241.51 17:42, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ezarateesteban 17:08, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
It is a copy of another image, and it is of poor quality. Gospodar svemira (talk) 17:14, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate file Ezarateesteban 17:07, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Is this image own work as it appears to be? I ask this as another image on the flickr account owner's photostream may be a derivative image. Leoboudv (talk) 04:36, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete The flickruser uploaded also newspapers under cc-by, so the user may not understand the licence at all. The picture could been taken from here: http://www.nlucon.com/2013/05/exclusivo-saiba-quais-artistas-lgbt.html --CennoxX (talk) 20:22, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright status doubtful Lymantria (talk) 12:19, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted character, not nessacrily uploaders own work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:41, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation Ezarateesteban 17:03, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Doubtful copyright status. Scans of photographs of 1940s/1950s, unknown logo. Unlikely own works by the uploader.
- File:The first batch of Artyomovsk sparkling wine 54г.jpg
- File:Artomovsk 1950h.jpg
- File:GERB AW exept.jpg
A.Savin 08:07, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Buystagram (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement of company with questionable notability. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Criistorres (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Josenid panameña.jpg
- File:Josenid gallardo.jpg
- File:Josenid Adamaris Quintero Gallardo.jpg
- File:Josenid quintero.jpg
- File:Josenid Adamaris.jpg
- File:Josenid.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Historical photos of unclear origins and copyrights status and Commons:Derivative works from sport club logos.
- File:Juniorii.jpg
- File:Echipele de juniori.jpg
- File:Istorie.jpg
- File:Universitatea Craiova - Fc Kaiserslautern.jpg
- File:Universitatea Craiova - Benfica.jpg
- File:Infiintare + Palmares.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Enciclofurgo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: 4 cameras for 5 photos. Other uploads are also problematic: historical images and maps claimed to be own work.
- File:Vinagreta de pularda victor gutierrez.JPG
- File:El chef Víctor Gutiérrez.JPG
- File:Villa giralda estoril accidente 29.03.1956.jpg
- File:Fronton salinas de leniz leintz-gatzaga pi π.jpg
- File:Puente nogueroll arija ivan varona.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fotostudio Style IN (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement of company with questionable notability. Not used.
- File:Eingang vom Fotostudio.jpg
- File:Eingang Fotostudio.jpg
- File:Innenansicht Fotostudio.jpg
- File:Werbeschild Fotostudio.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Looks like set of advertisement. Some of photos are Commons:Derivative works from book pages.
- File:Biscuit cream caki.JPG
- File:کیک کوچک کاکائویی 2.JPG
- File:کیک کوچک کاکائویی.JPG
- File:Coffee cake with honey cream.JPG
- File:Vanila swirl bread.JPG
- File:ماکت 1آبیاری.JPG
- File:ماکت آبیاری به روش تشتکی.JPG
- File:موس انار.jpg
- File:کیک آجیل یلدا.jpg
- File:ژله 2چند رنگ.JPG
- File:ژله 1چند رنگ.JPG
- File:ژله چند رنگ.JPG
- File:Condensed milk bread.JPG
- File:Quik mix butter cake.JPG
- File:Curry bread.JPG
- File:Peach jam bread.JPG
- File:Sandwich buns.JPG
- File:کیک فرشته 1.JPG
- File:چیپس سیب زمینی با مایکروویو.JPG
- File:نان بادام زمینی.JPG
- File:کیک فرشته.JPG
- File:شیرینی قیفی ساده.JPG
- File:سالاد الویه.JPG
- File:ترایفل و پارفه.JPG
- File:کیک شکلاتی با مایکروویو.JPG
- File:دسر شکلات سفید.JPG
- File:افطار 2.JPG
- File:نان شیپوری.JPG
- File:نان قیفی 1.JPG
- File:نان خامه ای.JPG
- File:شیر کورن فلکس با بستنی.JPG
- File:مکرود.JPG
- File:افطار.JPG
- File:نان تون ماهی 1.JPG
- File:نان تون ماهی.JPG
- File:کیک یخچالی.JPG
- File:مافین باقلوا.JPG
- File:نان برگردان گردویی.JPG
- File:نان برگردان گردویی1.JPG
- File:شیک انبه.JPG
- File:مافین 1.JPG
- File:مافین.JPG
- File:کیک بستنی.JPG
- File:کیک09.JPG
- File:کیک 435.JPG
- File:Milk bread.JPG
- File:نان ها.JPG
- File:Coffee cookie bread.JPG
- File:Tabriz chocolate mouse.jpg
- File:Cramble cake (2).JPG
- File:Casterd.JPG
- File:Tuna fish salad.JPG
- File:Masala tea.JPG
- File:سالاد.JPG
- File:ناهار.JPG
- File:زنبور.JPG
- File:خورش بادنجان.JPG
- File:تسی.JPG
- File:شکلات.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Looks like collection of advertisement, not own work. Reuploaded after previous deletion.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Advertisement and postcards of unclear origins and copyrights status. Also out of Commons:Project scope. Similar images were deleted several times in past.
- File:Hy postcards.JPG
- File:Malaysian bookmark.JPG
- File:Happy birthday cupcake postcards.JPG
- File:Klcc 2 postcards.JPG
- File:Klcc postcards.JPG
- File:Have a sweet birthdat postcards.JPG
- File:Selamat hari raya aidilfit postcards.JPG
- File:3 cupcakes postcards.JPG
- File:Sweetest mom ever postcards.JPG
- File:Happy birthday kids postcards.JPG
- File:کیک کاکائو.JPG
- File:نان ها نان کشمشی نان مربایی.JPG
- File:Pan pan.JPG
- File:Bread bread.JPG
- File:Cake cake.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Looks like collection of promo photos, not own work.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Not sure about Saif Himself.JPG, but PEEKAY.jpg is an obvious screenshot, with multiple copies on the Internet. Thus
- Delete PEEKAY.jpg - no evidence whatsoever that uploader holds copyright. Materialscientist (talk) 03:07, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vaibhaavupadhyay (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Vaibhav upadhyay and lucky.jpg
- File:Vaibhav upadhyay on floor.jpg
- File:Vaibhav upadhyay first photo.jpg
- File:Vaibhav upadhyay and abdul majid raini.jpg
- File:Vaibhav upadhyay and abdul.jpg
- File:Vaibhaav upadhyay.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
What new could be added to collection of human genitalia images?
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Status unclear. Fry1989 eh? 01:08, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete This is a clearly copyright violation, see logo on club's website. Fma12 (talk) 20:28, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation Steinsplitter (talk) 06:56, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
imho relatively 'bad quality', no location, no 'educational use' and not in use, i.e. imho "out of scope". btw: imho authorship not clear, please have a look to the others uploads by user thx, Roland zh 20:03, 17 August 2013 (UTC) Roland zh 20:03, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Poor quality of image Balablitz (talk) 02:42, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
I uploaded this image, but missed the description and title for other shrine. さぱしあ (talk) 11:15, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: That’s not a good reason for deletion: Rename and/or recategorize and/or improve the description, just dont delete a good photo. -- Tuválkin ✉ 04:56, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason Steinsplitter (talk) 06:57, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Per this DR, I have preformed the overwrite. Fry1989 eh? 00:27, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Status unclear. Fry1989 eh? 01:08, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Status unclear. Fry1989 eh? 01:09, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Logo of football club Unión Española (See logo on official web). Fma12 (talk) 20:29, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:18, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
It's my work and I want it deleted. Uploaded better photo Robin Dearest (talk) 01:10, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
File:Alexandre Belliard lors du pré-lancement de son album "Légende d'un peuple, volume 3" à Rimouski- 2013-08-03 06-33.jpg
[edit]Duplicate with watermark of File:Alexandre_Belliard.jpg. Upload error confirmed by the author. Louperivois Ψ @ 03:19, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:18, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Es existiert eine neuere Version Manfred Roettle (talk) 03:53, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Es existiert eine neuere Version Manfred Roettle (talk) 03:54, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:44, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Es existiert eine neuere Version Manfred Roettle (talk) 03:55, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:44, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Es existiert eine neuere Version Manfred Roettle (talk) 03:56, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Uploader request. Cobija (talk) 04:43, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
svg version available Perumalism Chat 07:13, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Svg version available Perumalism Chat 07:18, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Non-free gravestone in Italy. Even if it would be anonymous, less than 70 years have passed since it was created. Eleassar (t/p) 07:58, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:44, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
I can't see any OTRS here so I guess that's copyvio; anyway, this uploader has already had some warnings. 164.126.126.222 09:06, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:44, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted image. No permission by the copyright holder, the TATA Group 91.57.89.61 11:14, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
I think its not own work 217.246.223.10 11:43, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
copy of file:Leibfriedscher Garten, 001.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 13:47, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:45, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
copy of file:Leibfriedscher Garten, 002.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 13:47, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:45, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Translation of Category:Theodore Kaczynski's manifest. (No original on commons). This CC-Licence doesn't allow commercial copies. 24.134.91.195 13:50, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
svg version availabe Perumalism Chat 14:19, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:44, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Make the file name available for the correct file. Wrong file was uploaded and then moved. Luen (talk) 14:43, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:44, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Can someone please determine whether this is- or isn't- in scope? Thank you. (Please also view user's other uploads if possible). Ubcule (talk) 14:49, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Apparent self-promotion. Can someone who speaks Spanish better please confirm this (or otherwise)? Thank you. Ubcule (talk) 14:51, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:44, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Borderline out-of-scope. Possible uncredited clip-art image? Can someone who speaks Spanish better than me please confirm this? Thank you. Ubcule (talk) 14:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Questionable if in-scope, and possible self-promotion (please view in context of user's other uploads). Ubcule (talk) 14:53, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Make the file name available for the correct file. Wrong file was uploaded and then moved. Luen (talk) 14:56, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:44, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Make the file name available for the correct file. Wrong file was uploaded and then moved. Luen (talk) 14:56, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:44, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Unclear if this is in scope or not. The text may have made sense in context of other slides in series, but as an isolated slide, this has limited utility. Ubcule (talk) 14:59, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
This was never the official coat of arms of Hiitola [7][8], and as an unofficial symbol it is not covered by {{PD-Coa-Finland}}. Jafeluv (talk) 16:18, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Tagged as self-created, but sourced to Facebook with an author which does not match the uploader. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:19, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:45, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
This was never the official coat of arms of Kaukola [9], and as an unofficial symbol it is not covered by {{PD-Coa-Finland}}. Jafeluv (talk) 16:20, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Interns at a company probably don't own the copyright to their logo. The only question is whether it passes threshhold of originality. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:27, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:44, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Uploader is featured in the image (accdg to title), release from photographer is required —SpacemanSpiff 19:19, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
No reasonable educational purpose, so out of scope. Also, the uploader scanned a photograph, so release from photographer is required. —SpacemanSpiff 19:20, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:44, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
I want to discuss whether this image meets COM:DM Ryūkotsusei (talk) 19:49, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thats not looking like own work of the uploader like stated. JuTa 20:25, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
This file uploded by me has a bad quality. A better file of the same theme was uploded by me here. -Krepideia judica causam tuam 22:23, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Very different files. Both are probably useful. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:10, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Roland zh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: imho authorship not clear [see metadata] and not in use, Roland zh 18:54, 6 August 2013 (UTC) INeverCry 03:48, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: There is nothing in the metadata that suggests to me that this is not own work. The uploader has uploaded several files from the same camera. I would not expect a two week old file to be in use yet, and "not in use" is not a reason to delete. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Roland zh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: imho authorship not clear [see metadata] and not in use, Roland zh 18:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC) INeverCry 03:49, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Comment Tineye: 29 results --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:50, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- None of them is an exact match. → Keep -- Rillke(q?) 12:05, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- None of them is an exact match. →
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Roland zh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: imho authorship not clear [see metadata] and not in use, Roland zh 18:54, 6 August 2013 (UTC) INeverCry 03:50, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Roland zh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: imho authorship not clear [see metadata] and not in use, Roland zh 18:53, 6 August 2013 (UTC) INeverCry 03:51, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Roland zh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: imho authorship not clear [see metadata] and not in use, Roland zh 18:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC) INeverCry 03:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Roland zh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: imho authorship not clear [see metadata] and not in use, Roland zh 18:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC) INeverCry 03:54, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Roland zh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: imho authorship not clear [see metadata] and not in use, Roland zh 18:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC) INeverCry 03:55, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Roland zh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: imho authorship not clear [see metadata] and not in use, Roland zh 18:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC) INeverCry 03:56, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Roland zh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: imho authorship not clear [see metadata] and not in use, Roland zh 18:56, 6 August 2013 (UTC) INeverCry 03:59, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Roland zh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: imho authorship not clear [see metadata] and not in use, Roland zh 18:56, 6 August 2013 (UTC) INeverCry 04:00, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Uploader claims to use a cloud service which automatically reduces the size so we can explain the metadata. In this case however, it is difficult to assess whether the file shows a digitally altered digi-cam shot or something else (e.g. a photo of a physical photo). -- Rillke(q?) 07:24, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Rillke, I uploaded the file that contains meta data. However I processed it for antique look using GIMP/Iphoto. I am wondering if it does provide enough evidence to ascertain that the photo indeed was mine [owing to its antique looks]. Do you want me to upload the original photo [unprocessed] and then revert to the photo I like to keep ? In general what is the best way to upload such photos [processed for antique looks] ?
Keep -- uploader has established authorship; it's clearly the same photo. Lx 121 (talk) 08:46, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Artist Joan Fuster Bonnin died 1943. This will become public domain 2024 (80 years p.m.a in Spain). JuTa 05:25, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
this picture is a Can Prunera Museum of de Soller (Mallorca) is a Public Museum. Is a Picture from free access. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.43.49.220 (talk • contribs) 2013-08-17T10:19:53 (UTC)
this picture is a Can Prunera Museum of de Soller (Mallorca) is a Public Museum. Is a Picture from free access.
- I'm sorry but there is no so called "freedom of panorama" in Spain indoors (only outoors). Compare COM:FOP#Spain. regards --JuTa 18:56, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- NOTE: There is no publication or creation date given and I was unable to find one via Google. I'm setting the undeletion date to 2039 in case the artist painted it in the last year of his life. The title is either "Sa Foradada" or "Costa Mallorquina".
Own work unlikely, since the picture was probably taken in the 1920's. No particular reason to think it is in the PD either. BrightRaven (talk) 08:44, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
You are right. The person who took this photo is most probably dead by now, either way I have the family permission to put this photo on Wikipedia. I don't know much about copyright and all that, but didn't find one that suited my situation and since I have the family/community permission just used that one. --Bricking (talk) 14:50, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- The only person who can grant such a permission is the person who took the photograph or his/her heirs. The permission of the family is irrelevant. BrightRaven (talk) 16:44, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- How's so? The person who took the photograph was paid to do that, taking personal portraits of Barros Basto and its family. All photos belong to the family and some are in the synagogue museum. So no, the photograph has nothing to do with the photograph. It's ridiculous to claim such. If you take a photo for your id or something similar the right to that photo are yours or the photograph? It is yours of course. --Bricking (talk) 21:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Of course not. The copyright belongs to the author of the artwork. See COM:L. BrightRaven (talk) 08:08, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- For an old image like that, if the author is unknown, maybe this licence could apply, but on the condition that the image was published more than 70 years ago and the name of the author was never disclosed. BrightRaven (talk) 08:31, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- Regarding copyright laws it could so in the USA, but in Portugal a photographer paid to take portraits of people have no right to said photograph. The person who took this is most likely dead either way the family who paid him has the photos and are the ones who matter legally. This picture wasn't published 70 years ago as again it was in the family possession. Wikimedia hasn't thought out that people acquire or have copyright of photos, video, etc, by other ways. Not every country functions in the legal sense as America.--Bricking (talk) 12:09, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- Wikimedia Commons is highly aware of the copyright legislation in various countries, including Portugal. Please see Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Portugal. The fact is that the general rule in all countries, including Portugal, is: you need the author's authorization to publish a work of art. In the case of Portugal, the copyright law is very explicit: "Aquele que subsidie ou financie por qualquer forma, total ou parcialmente, a preparação, conclusão, divulgação de uma obra não adquire, por esse facto, sobre esta, salvo convenção escrita em contrário, qualquer dos poderes incluídos no direito de autor" (Art. 13 of the copyright law). BrightRaven (talk) 12:28, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- As I said before, this isn't a work of art, it is a personal photograph of Barros Basto. That said copyright doesn't apply.--Bricking (talk) 13:35, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- Please read the copyright law: "As criações intelectuais do domínio literário, científico e artístico, quaisquer que sejam o género, a forma de expressão, o mérito, o modo de comunicação e o objectivo, compreendem nomeadamente: [...] Obras fotográficas ou produzidas por qualquer processo análogos aos da fotografia; [...]" (Art. 2, § 1). BrightRaven (talk) 13:46, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- This whole discussion is becoming ridiculous as you clearly aren't able to understand simple things. This photograph was paid and as such the rights to it belong to the family. If you think they aren't you can go to a lawyer and ask yourself. I will no longer participate in this charade.--Bricking (talk) 01:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
- Please read the copyright law: "As criações intelectuais do domínio literário, científico e artístico, quaisquer que sejam o género, a forma de expressão, o mérito, o modo de comunicação e o objectivo, compreendem nomeadamente: [...] Obras fotográficas ou produzidas por qualquer processo análogos aos da fotografia; [...]" (Art. 2, § 1). BrightRaven (talk) 13:46, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- As I said before, this isn't a work of art, it is a personal photograph of Barros Basto. That said copyright doesn't apply.--Bricking (talk) 13:35, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- Wikimedia Commons is highly aware of the copyright legislation in various countries, including Portugal. Please see Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Portugal. The fact is that the general rule in all countries, including Portugal, is: you need the author's authorization to publish a work of art. In the case of Portugal, the copyright law is very explicit: "Aquele que subsidie ou financie por qualquer forma, total ou parcialmente, a preparação, conclusão, divulgação de uma obra não adquire, por esse facto, sobre esta, salvo convenção escrita em contrário, qualquer dos poderes incluídos no direito de autor" (Art. 13 of the copyright law). BrightRaven (talk) 12:28, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- Regarding copyright laws it could so in the USA, but in Portugal a photographer paid to take portraits of people have no right to said photograph. The person who took this is most likely dead either way the family who paid him has the photos and are the ones who matter legally. This picture wasn't published 70 years ago as again it was in the family possession. Wikimedia hasn't thought out that people acquire or have copyright of photos, video, etc, by other ways. Not every country functions in the legal sense as America.--Bricking (talk) 12:09, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- For an old image like that, if the author is unknown, maybe this licence could apply, but on the condition that the image was published more than 70 years ago and the name of the author was never disclosed. BrightRaven (talk) 08:31, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- Of course not. The copyright belongs to the author of the artwork. See COM:L. BrightRaven (talk) 08:08, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- How's so? The person who took the photograph was paid to do that, taking personal portraits of Barros Basto and its family. All photos belong to the family and some are in the synagogue museum. So no, the photograph has nothing to do with the photograph. It's ridiculous to claim such. If you take a photo for your id or something similar the right to that photo are yours or the photograph? It is yours of course. --Bricking (talk) 21:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: For someone who says "I don't know much about copyright and all that" and has 24 edits on Commons, Bricking claims a lot of expertise. In fact, BrightRaven is correct. The copyright belongs to the photographer's heirs. And, perhaps more important, "the family permission to put this photo on Wikipedia" would not be sufficient even if they do own the copyright. Commons and Wikipedia require permission for all use, not just WP. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:22, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Metadata indicates this photo was taken with an Iphone 4 in 1944. Seems unlikely, then, that the uploader actually created this image. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:16, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
This picture is a personal pictures of my grand-father. This is a personal contribution effectively scanned with an iPhone in order to developed the wikipedia article of my grand-father.
--Lbrisard (talk) 21:28, 17 August 2013 (UTC)lbrisard
Deleted: It is unlikely that the subject or his family would own the copyright in this photo -- that almost certainly rests with the photographer or his heirs. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:25, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
"This photo is my property, I am holder of copyright" (talk to me)--Lbrisard (talk) 16:35, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
As above, metadata indicates iPhone camera in 1944, which suggests that something's off. Uploader is certainly not the original creator, as the author of this work died in 2001 (per the other upload, listed above). (ESkog)(Talk) 16:18, 17 August 2013 (UTC) This picture is a personal pictures of my grand-father. This is a personal contribution effectively scanned with an iPhone in order to developed the wikipedia article of my grand-father.--Lbrisard (talk) 21:31, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:25, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Looks like an Iphone picture of an older photograph; copyright would still rest with whoever actually created that older photograph, depending on creation date/source nation. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:21, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
This is a personal contribution. This picture is a personal source of my grand-father in order to complete his wikipedia file.--Lbrisard (talk) 21:33, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:25, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Logo - Threhsold of orignality concern. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:18, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep too simple. Fry1989 eh? 05:39, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:25, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio notice removed under "PD logo" ("simple shapes and text" rationale) by User:Hedwig in Washington. I believe that (at minimum) the design of the graphic element goes quite clearly beyond the (generally) overused composite of "simple shapes" reasoning. Ubcule (talk) 20:30, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with the nominator. I had tagged for speedy deletion based on the same logic, and the fact that the uploader did not provide evidence that s/he was the owner of the copyright with rights to release the image. WikiDan61 (talk) 12:39, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Yes more than "simple shapes" LGA talkedits 20:37, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted by User:Fastily Dschwen (talk) 17:05, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. No evidence of license to reproduce the text of the marker nor the photograph displayed on the marker. — Ipoellet (talk) f.k.a. Werewombat 20:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- It's always hard to decide when photos of publicly dislayed markers and signs are usable in Wikipedia (e.g. photos shown in the Historical marker article and the "Category:Historical markers in the United States" gallary. Doubt if people got permission to reproduce the text in all those photos. On the other hand, its not worth contesting so I'm ok with this photo being deleted.--Orygun (talk) 07:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: As you say, they're a problem, We certainly have many that should be deleted. On the other hand, most such markers do not have notice or registration, so, if erected before 1989, they're all right. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:32, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
"Copyvio" was removed claiming the "simple shapes and text" rationale. I believe that this is (at best) a borderline case. Ubcule (talk) 20:26, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Question While this is free in the US what are the laws in El Salvador relating to threshold of originality ? LGA talkedits 20:45, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 08:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=533246940019283&set=a.151272558216725.28652.129531920390789&type=1&permPage=1 posted: 2012-11-20 // http://www.georgianjews.org/stat.php?id=903&lang=gr posted 2012-11-21 in higher resolution Rillke(q?) 19:13, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- It seems that an OTRS request is pending so please don't delete until completed but feel invited to comment. -- Rillke(q?) 21:36, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: otrs pending then FASTILY 08:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, also containing sexist descriptions.
- File:Wandelende vrouwen in de polder.JPG
- File:Female walking in Holland.JPG
- File:Jogging walking females.JPG
- File:Jogging women in Holland.JPG
- File:Wandelende jonge vrouw.JPG
- File:Begin vierdaagse Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Defecate sick and constipated woman.jpg
- File:Moeder en dochter tijdens het vliegerfestival.JPG
- File:Mother and daughter with a kite in Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Walking old woman in Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Three walking first aid women in Holland.JPG
- File:Mother and daughter with a kite.JPG
- File:Wandelende vrouw.JPG
- File:Vliegerfestival in Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Woman and a dog.JPG
- File:Urinating dog.JPG <-- this could stay. --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- File:Defecating dog.JPG
- File:Squatting female.JPG
- File:Jogging and running female in Holland.JPG
- File:Running and jogging woman in the Netherlands.JPG
- File:Two sitting females on a bench.JPG
- File:Two walking old women.JPG
- File:Two walking females in Holland.JPG
- File:Mother and daughter walking.JPG
- File:Walking woman in Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Walking young woman in Holland.JPG
- File:Walking woman with her child.JPG
- File:Walking woman and her little daughter.JPG
- File:Walking woman and her daughter in Holland.JPG
- File:Walking woman 2.JPG
- File:Walking mother with her daughters.JPG
- File:Walking female with dogs in Holland.JPG
- File:Walking female with a dog in Holland.JPG
- File:Walking female in Holland.JPG
- File:Walking female 8.JPG
- File:Walking female 6.JPG
- File:Walking female 3.JPG
- File:Running female in the Netherlands.JPG
- File:Walking old woman in the Netherlands.JPG
- File:Many women have constipation during their pregnancy.jpg
- File:Constipation and pregnancy.jpg
- File:Woman using toiletpaper after defecation.jpg
- File:Constipated cow.JPG
- File:Mother coot and her baby its mother love in the nature.JPG
- File:Veel jonge moeders gaan fiets goed voor de gezondheid en om constipatie te voorkomen.JPG
- File:Two young ducks.JPG
- File:Bewegen zoals fietsen is belangrijk voor iedere vrouw met constipatie ook om constipatie te voorkomen.JPG
- File:A pigeon in the grass.JPG
- File:Urinating cow.JPG
- File:Urinating cow in the field.JPG
- File:Defecate cow in the field.JPG
- File:Sport zoals bewegen is goed voor elke vrouw vooral om constipatie te voorkomen.JPG
- File:Sport like jogging and running important for every woman for her health and to prevent constipation.JPG
- File:Defecate sick woman with diarrhea.jpg
- File:Defecate on the toilet is always privacy.jpg
- File:Jogging and running is good for het digestion of every female and to prevent constipation.JPG
- File:White scarecrows in the field.JPG
- File:Two walking girls with two horses.JPG
- File:Running man in the mallebos.JPG
- File:Woman who only childbirth of her child getting squat.jpg
- File:Defecate and sick woman on the toilet.jpg
- File:Group of defecate women on the latrine.jpg
- File:Walking female with two dogs good for her health and to prevent constipation.JPG
- File:Two defecating girls on the potty.jpg
- File:Defecate lady on the potty.jpg
- File:Defecate female on the toilet.jpg
- File:Flock of coots bilding a nest.jpg
- File:A mother coot with her baby in a nest.jpg
- File:A coot with young coot and lot of eggs.jpg
- File:A coot family on a nest.jpg
- File:Woman who sits on the waterfront.JPG
- File:Fighting coots.JPG
- File:Two fighting black coots in a ditch.JPG
- File:Three walking women good for the health and to prevent constipation.JPG
- File:Women Walking on a hot day good for health and to prevent constipation.JPG
- File:Oude vrouw in klederdracht in Stellendam.jpg
- File:A woman learn calligraphy.jpg
- File:Defecate woman on a simpel toilet.jpg
- File:Standing woman in the grass after walking good for health and to prevent constipation.JPG
- File:Running man.JPG
- File:Wandelen gezond ook om constipatie te voorkomen.JPG
- File:Walking good for health.JPG
- File:Mother gives her daughter to eat.JPG
- File:Fire geese and their family.JPG
- File:Een familie brandganzen.JPG
- File:Defecate girl on the potty.jpg
- File:Defecate girl on the toilet.jpg
- File:Squatting hard labor.jpg
- File:Vrouw wandelt met haar hond goed voor haar gezondheid en om constipatie te voorkomen.JPG
- File:Young woman on a pony.JPG
- File:A flounder in the sand.jpg
- File:Defecating squatting woman in India.jpg
- File:Woman defecating in India with a bottle of water as toiletpaper.jpg
- File:Defecating Inca woman.jpg
- File:Bewegen is goed voor elke vrouw om constipatie te voorkomen.JPG
- File:Running good for the health and to prevent constipation.JPG
- File:Walking is important for every female for her health also to prevent constipation.JPG
- File:Twee wandelende vrouwen uit Azië goed voor de gezondheid en om constipatie te voorkomen.JPG
- File:Sitting woman after walking good for the health.JPG
- File:Two women walking with a group of dogs good for every woman to prevent constipation.JPG
- File:Mother and two daughters and horses.JPG
- File:Two women nordic walking good for health and to prevent constipation.JPG
- File:Walking or jogging with your dog for health and to prevent constipation.JPG
- File:Running and jogging for health.JPG
- File:Swimming fish.JPG
- File:Freshwater mussels in the Netherlands.JPG
- File:Warning sign for cycling in Hollan d.JPG
- File:Neogobius melanostomus on a leg.JPG
- File:Warning sign pole in ground.JPG
- File:Wandelende jonge vrouw wandelen is goed voor de gezondheid en om constipatie te voorkomen.JPG
- File:Hardlopen zoals joggen is goed voor elke vrouw voor haar gezondheid de lijn en om constipatie te voorkomen.JPG
- File:Cycling man and running woman good for fitness for women to prevent constipation.JPG
- File:Many women go running with their kid good example also for their health and to prevent constipation.JPG
- File:For women with age of 40 years and older is running very good for health and to prevent constipation.JPG
- File:Many women go running jogging and walking for health and to prevent constipation.JPG
- File:Zwartbekgrondel in een vlakke hand.JPG
- File:Neogobius melanostomus in the palm of a hand.JPG
- File:Brown slug on a ground.JPG
- File:Moving like running is important for everybody for women for health and to prevent constipation.JPG
- File:Als u een aktieve vakantie wilt is hardlopen een goed voorbereiding.JPG
- File:Als u constipatie heeft is hardlopen erg goed ook om constipatie te voorkomen is hardlopen erg goed.JPG
- File:Sporting woman running is very good to avoid constipation if yout have constipation running is very good.JPG
- File:Walking young woman with a mobile phone to dial.JPG
- File:Veel jonge vrouwen gaan hardlopen wat goed is tegen constipatie ook bij constipatie is hardlopen erg goed.JPG
- File:A lot of women go walking good for the health and to prevent constipation.JPG
- File:Veel vrouwen wandelen met hun kinderen goed voor de gezondheid en om constipatie te voorkomen.JPG
- File:Walking woman good for the digestion and to prevent constipation.JPG
- File:Veel vrouwen gaan wandelen goed voor de gezondheid en om constipatie te voorkomen.JPG
- File:Nice woman of Bali in Indonesia.jpg
- File:Indian woman of the taquile island on lake titicaca in Peru.jpg
- File:Defecating woman on the toilet.jpg
- File:A lot of clouds.jpg
- File:Indian girl with a young alpaca in Peru.jpg
- File:A dogfish has rolled.jpg
- File:Costumed woman of Greece.jpg
- File:A neogobius melanostomus in hand.JPG
- File:Walking young female with a small black dog.JPG
- File:Ladies go walking that is good for health.JPG
- File:Move as walking with your dog is good for your health and to prevent constipation.JPG
- File:Walking woman with a large poodle much move is important.JPG
- File:The berenplaat.JPG
- File:De zwartbekgrondel heeft ook uitpuilende ogen.JPG
- File:The black spot on the first back is characteristic for the neogobius melanostomus.JPG
- File:A large neogobius melanostomus with background grass.JPG
- File:A neogobius melanostomus in grass.JPG
- File:Very small gudgeon.JPG
- File:Walking lady much move is important for the health of the woman.JPG
- File:A large bream.JPG
- File:A large alver.jpg
- File:Het ophogen van de molen was om windvang te blijven te behouden.jpg
- File:A big bass.JPG
- File:Spotted grouper caught with rod on the read sea in Egypt.jpg
- File:Bream caught in the Netherlands with a rod.jpg
- File:Peter van der Sluijs uit Spijkenisse toen hij ongeveer 12 jaar oud was met een brasem.jpg
- File:Defecating female.jpg
- File:Decefating girl on the toiletbox.jpg
- File:Op de maas varen veel boten met erts ed aan de overkant is Hoogvliet.JPG
- File:What is very great that boat ship with what beside it kontainers shipping is very small in the meuse.JPG
- File:In the Netherlands are different warnings signs for dogs.JPG
- File:Warning sign for dogs in the Netherlands.JPG
- File:Therefore, the volume of music voice on your environment and turn the music off temporarily if necessary on dangerous pieces where you're out running.JPG
- File:Jogging running young female on a cyclingroad.JPG
- File:Old women with costumes in Stellendam.jpg
- File:Shrimp peeling in Stellendam.jpg
- File:Landscape of Ireland.jpg
- File:A hybrid of a silver bream.jpg
- File:A group of people who is learning calligraphy.jpg
- File:A left-handed woman learns calligraphy.jpg
- File:A large blue shark.jpg
- File:Silver bream two pieces.JPG
- File:A large wyting.JPG
- File:A large trisopterus minutes.jpg
- File:A large pouting.JPG
- File:A large garfish.JPG
- File:Laag tij aan de maas en aan de overkant is Hoogvliet.JPG
- File:Opruimplicht ruim de poep van je hond op.JPG
- File:Very large starfish.JPG
- File:Oud huisje in Simonshaven.JPG
- File:Op weg naar het mallebos per paard.JPG
- File:Walking female with a dog walking with dog or children is good for your health.JPG
- File:A bedpan from Holland.jpg
- File:A poorcod.jpg
- File:A large neogobius melanostomus.jpg
- File:Spurdog caught with a rod in Ireland.jpg
- File:Dogfish caught in Ireland.jpg
- File:A large wolhandscrab caught in the Netherlands.jpg
- File:Two walking young woman good for their health.JPG
- File:Het bekende strandje aan de maasbolevair in Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Drukte op de maas de spijkenisserbrug laat veel grote schepen door.JPG
- File:Spijkenisserbrug staat weer eens omhoog voor een groot schip.JPG
- File:Bloem aan de maasbolevair in Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:De maas bij Spijkenisse heeft een mooie omgeving.JPG
- File:Het hart van Simonshaven.JPG
- File:Mooi beeld van Spijkenisse met de molen.JPG
- File:Molen nooitgedacht met het pannekoekenhuis.JPG
- File:Moving like walking is good for every woman.JPG
- File:Moving like walking good for everybody like women.JPG
- File:Feces of a sheep.JPG
- File:Spijkenisse recreatiestad aan de maas.JPG
- File:Running young woman moving like running is important for health.JPG
- File:Spijkenisse heeft veel ruimte voor sporters.JPG
- File:Spijkenisse groeisstad aan de maas.JPG
- File:De bekende bloem van Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Voorzijde van het oude kerkje in Simonshaven.JPG
- File:Moving like jogging and running is important for every young woman.JPG
- File:Het kerkje aan de achterzijde van Simonshaven.JPG
- File:Hardlopen is goed voor elke vrouw voor gezondheid en conditie.JPG
- File:Moving like running is important for every female.JPG
- File:Woman with drop spindle from the Viking period.jpg
- File:Big dab to a fishing rod caught in Ireland.jpg
- File:Snake from Equador.JPG
- File:A white nautilus shell.JPG
- File:A small Tridacna gigas.JPG
- File:A small grey gurnard.JPG
- File:Red gurnard on a stump.JPG
- File:A nice dogfish.JPG
- File:A nice spurdog.JPG
- File:Natuurgebied bij Spijkenisse naast het mallebos.JPG
- File:Head of a sheep.JPG
- File:Urinating sheep with long hair.JPG
- File:Defecating pony.JPG
- File:Squatting defecated sheep.JPG
- File:Running woman in Spijkenisse good for your health.jpg
- File:Water in het mallebos.JPG
- File:Walking female with her daughter.JPG
- File:Defecated cow.JPG
- File:Op de maas varen veel grote boten.JPG
- File:Aan de maas bij Spijkenisse kan je goed wandelen.JPG
- File:Spijkenisse city on the meuse.JPG
- File:The meuse on the other site is Hoogvliet.JPG
- File:The Spijkenisserbridge on the Meuse to hoogvliet.JPG
- File:Walking young female to Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Inham in de maas bij Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Walking black woman.JPG
- File:Walking jogging running young woman on a road.JPG
- File:Female Walking along the meuse.JPG
- File:Pier in the river Meuse at Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:The new bridge at Spijkenisse aan de maas.JPG
- File:Squatting childbirth woman gives birth alone without help.jpg
- File:Walking female in the middle of a large town.JPG
- File:Het nieuwe centru m van Spijkenisse met op de achtergrond de molen nooitgedacht.JPG
- File:Huisje van het oude groentewinkeltje in Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Walking young woman with a small dog on a small road.JPG
- File:Man uit Spijkenisse met klederdracht uit ongeveer 1900.JPG
- File:Portret van een vrouw uit Spijkenisse met klederdracht uit ongeveer 1900 op zondag.JPG
- File:Het mallebos kent veel mooie fietspaden.JPG
- File:Wandelen in het mallebos is gezond.JPG
- File:Two females are walking on a road with grass in a forest.JPG
- File:Walking path between the mallebos and the boezem.JPG
- File:Two cows have a conflict.JPG
- File:Twee koeien aan het vechten.JPG
- File:A lot of mushrooms in the Netherlands.JPG
- File:Ruiterpad voor het mallebos langs de boezem.JPG
- File:Tussen het mallebos en het park vogelezang is een brug.JPG
- File:Large plane in the air.JPG
- File:Snail on a stone.JPG
- File:A slug eating.JPG
- File:Really big slug.JPG
- File:House snail or Gastropodia.JPG
- File:Spotted ray or Aetobatus narinari.jpg
- File:Tremella mushroom.JPG
- File:Head of a garfish.JPG
- File:Hunting boemrang from Australia.JPG
- File:Thornback ray.JPG
- File:A slug in Netherlands.JPG
- File:Yellow mushroom or fungus in the mallebos.JPG
- File:Jogging and running female important for health and fitness.JPG
- File:Het mallebos heeft mooie bomen.JPG
- File:Tussen de twee gedeeltes van het mallebos is een weg voor fietsers bromfietsers hardlopers en wandelaars.JPG
- File:Two defecating females on the latrine in the Roman period.jpg
- File:Births were formerly also called done without help..jpg
- File:Defecated and sick lady.jpg
- File:Defecated women on a latrine in the Roman period.jpg
- File:Defecated woman on a toilet.jpg
- File:Scouting abtenaren met oa de vlaggen en een trompetist tijdens koninginnedag in Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Two officials keep the flag during queensday in Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Burgemeester Salet tijdens konginnedag in Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Burgemeester Salet houdt een toespraak tijdens de opening van koninginnedag.JPG
- File:Restand van de oude brug naast de nieuwe brug van Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Monument van de oude Spijkenisser brug.JPG
- File:Young female on a bike in the polder.JPG
- File:Walking female on a cycleroad in a town.JPG
- File:Feces of a pony.JPG
- File:De polder van Spijkenisse biedt fietsers een mooie omgeving.JPG
- File:A large group walking girls in Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Het centrum van Spijkenisse tijdens koninginnedag.JPG
- File:Walking woman with dog in Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Walking female with a shepard.JPG
- File:Jogging and walking black young female.JPG
- File:Cycling young female on a small road.JPG
- File:Woman walking behind the stroler.JPG
- File:Walking jogging woman on a road with grass.JPG
- File:Two women walking behind the stroller.JPG
- File:Two cycling women a mother and daugther good for health and to prevent constipation.JPG
- File:Two fighting cows.JPG
- File:Two skating women on a small road.JPG
- File:Woman at the roller blading in the vicinity of the mallebos.JPG
Ices2Csharp (talk) 20:41, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete all the creepy stalker images, keep the rest. I don't see any point in us hosting his huge collection of creepy stalker images, especially since half of them have nonsense titles. These are just useless cruft. Kaldari (talk) 03:32, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Well obviously there aresome which don't belong in this DR and should stay, such as File:Warning sign at the meuse side by Spijkenisse.JPG, so this is gonna have to be picked through with a fine comb. I'd also hardly call "Running and jogging is good for every woman for her health and to prevent constipation" sexist, but it's absolutely creepy, so nuke the creepy stalker ones and keep any good ones like that warning sign. Fry1989 eh? 03:47, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- True, it looks like a few of the images are outside the stalker theme. We should probably keep those. I've modified my vote accordingly. That sign photo is hilarious. Kaldari (talk) 04:02, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- I removed File:Warning sign at the meuse side by Spijkenisse.JPG from the nomination. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:10, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- True, it looks like a few of the images are outside the stalker theme. We should probably keep those. I've modified my vote accordingly. That sign photo is hilarious. Kaldari (talk) 04:02, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Well obviously there aresome which don't belong in this DR and should stay, such as File:Warning sign at the meuse side by Spijkenisse.JPG, so this is gonna have to be picked through with a fine comb. I'd also hardly call "Running and jogging is good for every woman for her health and to prevent constipation" sexist, but it's absolutely creepy, so nuke the creepy stalker ones and keep any good ones like that warning sign. Fry1989 eh? 03:47, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Jeez - what a load of... I've just deleted one that is so blurry/pointless that I am happy it is clearly out of scope. I'll trawl through more when I get the time. --Herby talk thyme 08:15, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
NUKE all images which have captions or image titles which speculate on the state of the photographed subject's bowels. AnonMoos (talk) 13:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Would this include any of the following? Kramer Associates (talk) 19:47, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- File:Sporting woman running is very good to avoid constipation if yout have constipation running is very good.JPG
- File:Hardlopen zoals joggen is goed voor elke vrouw voor haar gezondheid de lijn en om constipatie te voorkomen.JPG
- File:Vrouw wandelt met haar hond goed voor haar gezondheid en om constipatie te voorkomen.JPG
- File:Constipated cow.JPG
- I have deleted a lot of obvious {{Out of scope}} ones. Needs opinions on whether the current remaining ones are Out of scope or not. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:50, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- When I find a lot of images like File:A coot family on a nest.jpg, File:A coot with young coot and lot of eggs.jpg, File:A dogfish has rolled.jpg marked as "Out of scope, also containing sexist descriptions" I can't help but feel there is an abuse of process going on here. The idea of DRs is to nominate images that one has looked at and decided probably should be deleted, not nominate everything and leave it to other people to sort through the list. A lot of people have no doubt wasted a lot of effort trawling through this long list of bad taste (and apparently creepy stalker) images when really the nominator should have at least looked at every image before nominating. I haven't looked at all the remaining images, but those I have looked at seem fine, so I vote keep the rest for now, until someone finds a specific reason to delete. --Tony Wills (talk) 12:28, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
How can you say this user a >>creepy stalker<<? Is it forbidden to photograph people that are even not identifyable on the images? --79.221.106.19 13:22, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- Agree. These insults are embarrassing. --Trycatch (talk) 13:39, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- It is simply censorship on the basis that the images make people here very worried about the photographer's state of mind. An excessive interest in toilet/constipation/defication is bad enough, but an excessive number of images of young women, probably taken without their knowledge, is a big worry. If there was only the odd image on these subject lines they might be seen as useful. I think people want to encourage the photographer to broaden their photographic subject matter and stop following young women about with a camera ;-). Complain at the administrators notice board, or post undeletion requests if it is important to you. --Tony Wills (talk) 13:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- Per Tony - there is probably quite a lot of the remaining ones that should be kept in practice. However some were simply junk images. Maybe a bit much to nom all the uploads. --Herby talk thyme 13:57, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- I chose this way to avoid wasting hours on this. If administrators agree the remaining files are OK, just keep them and close the DR, no problem. I think the real problematic files are already gone. Ices2Csharp (talk) 18:48, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Not keeping this open any longer. In future, do not mass nominate everything an editor uploads, when half of the files they have uploaded are obviously in scope, and do not fall into the reason for deletion. You use visualfilechange, so group similar files together for review. Do not use the excuse of doing it like this to save yourself "hours", becasuse now I am going to have to waste hours to clean up after a disruptive nomination. russavia (talk) 11:33, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- Well, in fact you just spent 6 minutes on it. This was an exceptional case, for which visual selection wouldn't do. I could have made separate DRs for all of the files that have been deleted, but that would have been far more time consuming, even for closing administrators. I don't know why you call this 'disruptive', do you actually know the meaning of that word? Ices2Csharp (talk) 13:05, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wrong defecation hemorrhoids.jpg, bad quality user artwork with no educational value.
- File:Pregnancy and hemorrhoids.jpg
- File:Vrouw die zit.jpg
- File:Zwangere vrouw met aambeien op toilet.jpg
- File:Woman with cramp and diarrhea on toilet.jpg
- File:Brawl and hairpulling women.jpg
- File:Woman with fast-acting thyroid on toilet.jpg
- File:Two defecated women.jpg
- File:Defecated girl on potty.jpg
- File:Head of woman with long hair.jpg
- File:Female on the toilet.jpg
- File:Woman on toiletbox.jpg
- File:Woman with foodposion.jpg
- File:Two women with long hair.jpg
- File:Two women in conflict.jpg
- File:Cramp woman.jpg
- File:Four women.jpg
- File:Three sitting women.jpg
- File:Egypt woman on toilet .jpg
- File:Woman on the toilet.jpg
- File:Pregnant and hemorrhoids.jpg
- File:Defecated female India.jpg
- File:Sick black woman.jpg
- File:A female brawl.jpg
- File:Women brawl.jpg
- File:Sitting woman with long black hair.jpg
- File:Diarrhea.jpg
- File:Sitting woman in Holland in art.jpg
- File:Seated woman with big dress Holland.jpg
- File:Sitting woman in Holland.jpg
- File:Woman with glasses and ill.jpg
- File:Dutch woman with bag.jpg
- File:Woman on exercise ball backside.jpg
- File:Woman on exercise ball.jpg
- File:Pregnant woman on a exercise ball therapy.jpg
- File:Female in art Holland.jpg
- File:Food poisoning.jpg
- File:Crouching woman with long hair.jpg
- File:Young mother with drinking child.jpg
- File:High pregnant young woman.jpg
- File:Sitting female with a drop spindle.jpg
-mattbuck (Talk) 01:00, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, not the best quality. -- Cirt (talk) 03:43, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Tasteless crap; even some of the (dutch) filenames are disgusting. Just flush. Jahoe (talk) 19:32, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Commons is not DeviantArt - David Gerard (talk) 18:04, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --High Contrast (talk) 12:54, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
NOTE: Previous discussions of files from this uploader have been moved to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Toilet/Archive. (ESkog)(Talk) 19:38, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
A very large number of this user's uploads seem to be outside the Commons:Project scope. In particular, many of these uploads are images of random unidentifed women, mostly from behind. There does not seem to be any conceivable encyclopedic purpose for these images. I've tried to carefully pare the list down to only those which are clearly problematic; there may be more that warrant individual discussion.
- File:Walking female on market in Spijkenisse.jpg
- File:Walking girl with black bag on shoulder.jpg
- File:Wandelende vrouw met honden Nederland.jpg
- File:Crouching and sitting female.jpg
- File:Cycling female near forest.jpg
- File:Jogging female with mobile in hand.jpg
- File:Black mother daughter walking 3.jpg
- File:Twee wandelende donkere vrouwen.jpg
- File:Mallebos heeft mooie ruiterpaden.jpg
- File:Horserijders and walking people.jpg
- File:A drinking female.jpg
- File:Walking couple with black dog.jpg
- File:Buttocks of walking female.jpg
- File:In hand woman with horse.jpg
- File:Cycling blond girl 4.jpg
- File:Billen.jpg
- File:Fietsende vrouw bij mallebos 2.jpg
- File:Walking girl with blond long hair 4.jpg
- File:Buttocks of woman.jpg
- File:Skating black girl.jpg
- File:Ass of a woman.jpg
- File:Cycling old female.jpg
- File:Cycling female with blond hair Holland 3.jpg
- File:Cycling female with bag.jpg
- File:French tourist in Holland mallebos.jpg
- File:Two sitting females 4.jpg
- File:Crouching female on waterside.jpg
- File:Vrouw die loopt in de polder.jpg
- File:Running man and female in Holland 3.jpg
- File:Summer walking of a woman.jpg
- File:Walking sportsfemale.jpg
- File:Fietsende vrouw in de polder.JPG
- File:Two running jogging and walking females 3.JPG
- File:Running woman with red shirt.JPG
- File:Running woman in Spijkenisse 3.JPG
- File:Sitting woman near the waterside.JPG
- File:Walking jogging sportswoman Holland.jpg
- File:Woman fishing in spui Holland.jpg
- File:Woman with fishing rod Holland.jpg
- File:Fietsende dame.jpg
- File:Walking and jogging female 11.jpg
- File:Black and white girl walking.jpg
- File:Meiden die skeeleren 5.jpg
- File:Running female near mallebos.jpg
- File:Roller skating woman 4.jpg
- File:Roller skating woman 3.jpg
- File:Three walking girls with dog 3.jpg
- File:Walking female with her dogs 3.JPG
- File:Cycling female 2.JPG
- File:Walking and jogging female 3.jpg
- File:Running female 8.jpg
- File:Running female 6.jpg
- File:Running blond woman 3.jpg
- File:Cyclist female on road.jpg
- File:Woman running in summer.jpg
- File:Two walking girl one with bike.jpg
- File:Two running women 6.jpg
- File:Skating girl 4.jpg
- File:Running woman on a road 4.jpg
- File:Running woman 7.jpg
- File:Running woman 6.jpg
- File:Oversteken in Spijkenisse.jpg
- File:Walking woman with two wolves dogs.jpg
- File:Running woman with tattoos.jpg
- File:Walking woman and girl and large dog and a small one.jpg
- File:Two walking and jogging females 3.jpg
- File:Standing woman and dog.jpg
- File:Black braided hair female Sri Lanka.JPG
- File:Young female braided hair and bag Sri Lanka.JPG
- File:Fishing female in chair.JPG
- File:Walking woman with brown bag.jpg
- File:Woman running on a road in Spijkenisse.jpg
- File:Cyclist who drinks.jpg
- File:Cycling sportswoman.jpg
- File:Cycling sportsfemale in Holland.jpg
- File:Cycling cyclist.jpg
- File:Twee wandelende vrouwen.JPG
- File:Two sitting females looking dancing.JPG
- File:Two sitting women in Kandy Sri Lanka.JPG
- File:Female with black hair in train Sri Lanka.JPG
- File:Woman bathing in Sri Lanka.JPG
- File:Walking girls with black braided long hair Sri Lanka.JPG
- File:Woman Toilet with toilet paper for the ladies room Sri Lanka.JPG
- File:Three walking girls in Sri Lanka.JPG
- File:Walking woman in Kandy Sri Lanka.jpg
- File:Walking female with long hair Sri Lanka.jpg
- File:Female long black hair Sri Lanka.jpg
- File:Very very long hair Sri Lanka.JPG
- File:Two walking women Sri lanka.JPG
- File:Two sitting girls one with long hair.JPG
- File:Sitting girl long hair Sri Lanka.JPG
- File:Girl braided long hair Sri Lanka.JPG
- File:Female braided long hair Sri Lanka.JPG
- File:Backside flight attentant.JPG
- File:Crouching female with hat in Bolivia.jpg
- File:Crouching female in Bolivia with white hat.jpg
- File:Crouching woman during event.jpg
- File:Crouching female helping .jpg
- File:Vrouw aan het skeeleren.JPG
- File:Running female white headphone.JPG
- File:Ook veel vrouwen trainen alleen.JPG
- File:Vogelzang en mallebos recreatiegebied.JPG
- File:Many females jogging.JPG
- File:Crouching in Indonesia.jpg
- File:Crouching female early middle ages.jpg
- File:Crouching female and her child standing.jpg
- File:Crouching blond mother with little daughter.jpg
- File:Sitting female in Holland.jpg
- File:Blond woman crouching.jpg
- File:Girl with blond hair and phone.JPG
- File:Moving skating cycling people.JPG
- File:Running sportsfemale.JPG
- File:Two horses three girls.JPG
- File:Three dogs and woman walking.JPG
- File:Blond girl with horses mallebos.JPG
- File:Crouching angling woman.JPG
- File:Angling blond female.JPG
- File:Walking woman tied up hair.JPG
- File:Girls on skates Holland.JPG
- File:Vrouw met lang blond haar.JPG
- File:Blond female with braids.JPG
- File:Woman with blond hair and flag.JPG
- File:Twee joggende damens.JPG
- File:Wandelen joggen in het mallebos.JPG
- File:Recreatie stad Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Walking female with two dogs.JPG
- File:Two horsewomen.JPG
- File:Wandelende dames.JPG
- File:Walking mother and girls.JPG
- File:Walking female in Spijkenisse centre.JPG
- File:Vrouw aan het joggen Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Walking woman puts out about.JPG
- File:Running female with headphone and drinkingbottles.JPG
- File:Eating pony with girl.JPG
- File:In hand horsegirl Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Vrouw die hurkt.JPG
- File:Walking woman with stroller and son.JPG
- File:Fietsende vrouw.JPG
- File:Two sitting black females.JPG
- File:Walking mother with children.JPG
- File:Two rollerskaters in Holland.JPG
- File:Sitting woman and children.JPG
- File:Horseriding mallebos.JPG
- File:Wandelende donkere vrouw.JPG
- File:Wandelen mallebos recreatiegebied.JPG
- File:Horseriding Holland.JPG
- File:Running girls Holland.JPG
- File:Sitting women bench.JPG
- File:Large group running girls.JPG
- File:Backside dressed Spanisch army.JPG
- File:Mother and daughter horseriding.JPG
- File:Trimster in Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Walking in Geervliet.JPG
- File:Young female long hair Equador.jpg
- File:Woman with toiletpaper.jpg
- File:Two crouching females Indonesia.jpg
- File:Two crouching girls Nepal.jpg
- File:Sitting women Peru.jpg
- File:Lof of crouching women India.jpg
- File:Three crouching women.jpg
- File:Female long hair Nepal.jpg
- File:Female with blond hair and cap.jpg
- File:Woman with blound hair.JPG
- File:Mother and daughter in Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Crouching woman behind wall Peru.jpg
- File:Running housewife.JPG
- File:Walking woman with a dog.jpg
- File:Fietsende man en hardloopster.JPG
- File:Women are good runners.JPG
- File:Wedstrijdlopers in actie.JPG
- File:Wedstrijdloopster in actie.JPG
(ESkog)(Talk) 17:55, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: Some of these images are perfectly normal — others, along with their titles, are alarmingly creepy. There is no reason to delete the former (and thus this DR has no merit), but crotch shots and candid moments should be deleted on sight. And I hope the local Police was warned about this pervert already, before he does worse than shaming uploads. -- Tuválkin ✉ 05:18, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
| “normal” images |
File:Mallebos heeft mooie ruiterpaden.jpg
File:Horserijders and walking people.jpg
File:French tourist in Holland mallebos.jpg
File:Woman bathing in Sri Lanka.JPG
File:Woman Toilet with toilet paper for the ladies room Sri Lanka.JPG
File:Woman with toiletpaper.jpg
File:Two crouching girls Nepal.jpg
File:Sitting women Peru.jpg
File:Three crouching women.jpg
|
|---|---|
| shots from the back |
File:Walking girl with black bag on shoulder.jpg File:Wandelende vrouw met honden Nederland.jpg File:Cycling female near forest.jpg File:Jogging female with mobile in hand.jpg File:Black mother daughter walking 3.jpg File:Twee wandelende donkere vrouwen.jpg File:Walking couple with black dog.jpg File:In hand woman with horse.jpg File:Cycling blond girl 4.jpg File:Fietsende vrouw bij mallebos 2.jpg File:Walking girl with blond long hair 4.jpg File:Skating black girl.jpg File:Vrouw die loopt in de polder.jpg File:Summer walking of a woman.jpg File:Fietsende vrouw in de polder.JPG File:Running woman with red shirt.JPG File:Running woman in Spijkenisse 3.JPG File:Sitting woman near the waterside.JPG File:Walking jogging sportswoman Holland.jpg File:Woman fishing in spui Holland.jpg File:Woman with fishing rod Holland.jpg File:Black and white girl walking.jpg File:Meiden die skeeleren 5.jpg File:Roller skating woman 3.jpg File:Roller skating woman 4.jpg File:Three walking girls with dog 3.jpg File:Running blond woman 3.jpg File:Woman running in summer.jpg File:Two walking girl one with bike.jpg File:Two running women 6.jpg File:Skating girl 4.jpg File:Running woman on a road 4.jpg File:Running woman 6.jpg File:Running woman 7.jpg File:Oversteken in Spijkenisse.jpg File:Walking woman with two wolves dogs.jpg File:Running woman with tattoos.jpg File:Walking woman and girl and large dog and a small one.jpg File:Standing woman and dog.jpg File:Walking woman with brown bag.jpg File:Woman running on a road in Spijkenisse.jpg File:Cyclist who drinks.jpg File:Cycling sportswoman.jpg File:Cycling cyclist.jpg File:Twee wandelende vrouwen.JPG File:Two sitting women in Kandy Sri Lanka.JPG File:Walking girls with black braided long hair Sri Lanka.JPG File:Three walking girls in Sri Lanka.JPG File:Walking woman in Kandy Sri Lanka.jpg File:Very very long hair Sri Lanka.JPG File:Two walking women Sri lanka.JPG File:Two sitting girls one with long hair.JPG File:Sitting girl long hair Sri Lanka.JPG File:Girl braided long hair Sri Lanka.JPG File:Crouching woman during event.jpg File:Vrouw aan het skeeleren.JPG File:Ook veel vrouwen trainen alleen.JPG File:Vogelzang en mallebos recreatiegebied.JPG File:Crouching blond mother with little daughter.jpg File:Girl with blond hair and phone.JPG File:Moving skating cycling people.JPG File:Two horses three girls.JPG File:Three dogs and woman walking.JPG File:Blond girl with horses mallebos.JPG File:Crouching angling woman.JPG File:Walking woman tied up hair.JPG File:Girls on skates Holland.JPG File:Vrouw met lang blond haar.JPG File:Woman with blond hair and flag.JPG File:Wandelen joggen in het mallebos.JPG File:Recreatie stad Spijkenisse.JPG File:Two horsewomen.JPG File:Vrouw aan het joggen Spijkenisse.JPG File:Walking woman puts out about.JPG File:Eating pony with girl.JPG File:In hand horsegirl Spijkenisse.JPG File:Walking woman with stroller and son.JPG File:Fietsende vrouw.JPG File:Two rollerskaters in Holland.JPG File:Sitting woman and children.JPG File:Horseriding mallebos.JPG File:Wandelende donkere vrouw.JPG File:Wandelen mallebos recreatiegebied.JPG File:Horseriding Holland.JPG File:Running girls Holland.JPG File:Sitting women bench.JPG File:Backside dressed Spanisch army.JPG File:Trimster in Spijkenisse.JPG File:Walking in Geervliet.JPG File:Female long hair Nepal.jpg File:Woman with blound hair.JPG File:Walking woman with a dog.jpg |
| buttocks closeups | |
| candid and/or unflattering poses |
File:Crouching in Indonesia.jpg File:Vrouw die hurkt.JPG File:Crouching woman behind wall Peru.jpg |
| (as above, with objectionable filenames) | |
| “normal” images |
File:Cycling old female.jpg File:Crouching female on waterside.jpg File:Female with black hair in train Sri Lanka.JPG File:Two crouching females Indonesia.jpg File:Women are good runners.JPG |
| shots from the back |
File:Walking female on market in Spijkenisse.jpg
File:Crouching and sitting female.jpg
File:Cycling female with blond hair Holland 3.jpg
File:Cycling female with bag.jpg
File:Running man and female in Holland 3.jpg
File:Walking sportsfemale.jpg
File:Two running jogging and walking females 3.JPG
File:Fietsende dame.jpg
File:Walking and jogging female 11.jpg
File:Running female near mallebos.jpg
File:Walking female with her dogs 3.JPG
File:Cycling female 2.JPG
File:Walking and jogging female 3.jpg
File:Running female 8.jpg
File:Running female 6.jpg
File:Cyclist female on road.jpg
File:Two walking and jogging females 3.jpg
File:Black braided hair female Sri Lanka.JPG
File:Young female braided hair and bag Sri Lanka.JPG
File:Fishing female in chair.JPG
File:Cycling sportsfemale in Holland.jpg
File:Two sitting females looking dancing.JPG
File:Walking female with long hair Sri Lanka.jpg
File:Female long black hair Sri Lanka.jpg
File:Female braided long hair Sri Lanka.JPG
File:Backside flight attentant.JPG
File:Crouching female in Bolivia with white hat.jpg
File:Crouching female with hat in Bolivia.jpg
File:Crouching female helping .jpg
File:Running female white headphone.JPG
File:Many females jogging.JPG
File:Crouching female early middle ages.jpg
File:Crouching female and her child standing.jpg
File:Sitting female in Holland.jpg
File:Blond woman crouching.jpg
File:Running sportsfemale.JPG
File:Angling blond female.JPG
File:Blond female with braids.JPG
File:Twee joggende damens.JPG
File:Walking female with two dogs.JPG
File:Wandelende dames.JPG
File:Walking mother and girls.JPG
File:Walking female in Spijkenisse centre.JPG
File:Running female with headphone and drinkingbottles.JPG
File:Two sitting black females.JPG
File:Walking mother with children.JPG
File:Mother and daughter horseriding.JPG
File:Young female long hair Equador.jpg
|
| buttocks closeups | |
| candid and/or unflattering poses | |
- Comment It's quite interesting how perfectly chosen the files names for the particular fotos are... And I vote to Keep keep at least two fotos File:Large group running girls.JPG and File:Lof of crouching women India.jpg since they seem to cope with all the rules (persons depicted only as a part of situation) and can be even usefull for some Wikipedia articles. Shaqspeare (talk) 11:51, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, with questionable intentions. Two kept per below FASTILY 08:34, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
private artwork, drawings and photoshop art, COM:SCOPE
- File:A childbirth three crouching women.jpg
- File:Urinating woman on a chamberpot.jpg
- File:Patient on the bedpan.jpg
- File:Squatting childbirth.jpg
- File:Crouching urinating female.jpg
- File:A chilbirth position of a female.jpg
- File:Adoring female.jpg
- File:Urinating female.jpg
- File:Woman colored with laugh.JPG
- File:A female.JPG
- File:Plover lays an egg.jpg
- File:Flying eagle in art.jpg
- File:Woman in art with flower.jpg
- File:Art of fireworks.jpg
Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:48, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete this crap please. Weissbier (talk) 09:56, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of COM:SCOPE --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:55, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Hand-drawn images of bad quality mostly about defecation and constipation. In this sole way POV and no educational use. Not the first time subject to deletion.
- File:Vrouw op een baarstoel in Egypte.jpg
- File:Obstipatie en verstopping bij de vrouw.jpg
- File:Catfight between two women.jpg
- File:Vrouw op het toilet.jpg
- File:Woman with golden earrings Holland.jpg
- File:Formerly there were no toilets, the open air offered plenty of room now even in developing countries, many people have no toilet.jpg
- File:Really pleased with the Indians in America, they were looking for a female-only eg, quiet spot to give birth.jpg
- File:Getting squat gave birth was formerly done much.jpg
- File:If you're at the camp and there is no toilet toilet a hole as first count when you finish your need on the feces throw then again so do not fly ground can.jpg
- File:Sick and constipated women through the ages.jpg
- File:Enkele barenshoudingen door de eeuwen heen.jpg
- File:Defecation women on the toilet throughout history.jpg
- File:Defecation women in History.jpg
- File:Constipated.jpg
- File:Pushing sick and constipated..jpg
- File:Repect for the privacy of every woman..jpg
- File:Fighting coal tit.jpg
- File:Peeing girl on the toilet..jpg
- File:Two girls peeing..jpg
- File:Deadly duel between women..jpg
- File:Urinating girls.jpg
- File:Becareful with hemorrhoids.jpg
- File:Girls in conflict and fighting..jpg
- File:Constipated and sick..jpg
- File:Constipated on the toilet..jpg
- File:Women on the latrine..jpg
- File:Constipated woman on the bedpan..jpg
- File:Squatting birth of a baby alpaca..jpg
- File:Sick nune on the potty..jpg
- File:Sick woman on bucket..jpg
- File:If you used the bedpan decide the position.jpg
- File:Als u de ondersteek gebruikt bepaal zelf de positie..jpg
- File:Sick woman on the latrine..jpg
- File:Deadly catfight..jpg
- File:Catfighting women..jpg
- File:If you use a bedpan the patient must determine its own position..jpg
- File:Het gebruik van de ondersteek in het ziekenhuis..jpg
- File:Using a bedpan in the hospital..jpg
- File:Using a bedpan on a chair..jpg
- File:Constipated bird.jpg
- File:Sick woman on the bedpan..jpg
- File:50% of all women have constipation..jpg
- File:Het gebruik van de ondersteek..jpg
- File:50% of the women have constipation or sometimes constipation..jpg
- File:Woman on a bedpan in hospital..jpg
- File:Lady on a toilet.jpg
Yikrazuul (talk) 11:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete and might we consider some form of sanction? We've stated repeatedly that we don't want this stuff. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:33, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Strongly agree. User Toilet had once a sanction, but this user is not interested in a chang of behaviour (just see the tons of deletion requests so far).
- In addition, what should we do with images like this, this or that violating COM:PEOPLE? Impo this user abuses commons as a sole own FlickR or picassa upload dumb of private images (holidays, vacations,..). --Yikrazuul (talk) 10:26, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. One wonders what is this person doing in their spare time other than uploading stuff to Commons… -- Tuválkin ✉ 17:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep File:Woman with golden earrings Holland.jpg. It is one of the very few drawings in Category:Women with braids, and the only colour drawing.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:36, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete all except File:Woman with golden earrings Holland.jpg. Agree with mattbuck that this user needs sanctions. Does Commons have an equivalent to Wikipedia's topic ban? --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 10:06, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Toilet 6
[edit]Please look at previous deletion requests for this uploader to get an idea of context.
| shots from behind, consent doubtful and encyclopedica value dubious. Some, like the first one, have problematic titles, too. Not exhaustive, there are quite a lot of these from the Rotterdam Marathon, too. |
|
|---|---|
| There are also many pictures of women and children squatting on their heels (and one of a man in the same pose, that I recall). Some, like the ones shown, seem to have little encyclopedic value, while others could be useful but need retitling to reflect what the photo actually shows, apart from the fact the fact that someone is crouching. Many of these and more are in Category:Crouching women. |
|
| There were quite a few shots of young girls with babies which had English and Dutch titles asserting that the girl was the child's mother (and one showing a child walking past someone in a nun's habit, asserting the same). I've requested renaming for most, but these children look so unhappy, I'd suggest that there is a consent concern, and maybe we should just delete them. There are also a lot of assertions of motherhood for women of more plausible ages; not sure what to do with those. |
|
| These are concerning on consent grounds (I've omitted the massage ones that show the photographer). |
|
While we're at it, I second the earlier suggestion that anything with the word "constipated" or similar should be renamed. Even non-human shots like File:Constipated camel..jpg and File:Constipated camel in Morocco.jpg.
Then there are some which appear to be non-consensual long-range shots of open defecation.
- File:Crouching girl in Bolivia.jpg
- File:Girl from Bolivia squatting.jpg is the same image with a slightly different cropping
- File:Sitting bolivian girl.jpg a third cropping of the same image
- File:Young Bolivian girl nl-authorship.jpg and a fourth. Do we have an automated tool for finding these?
- File:Hurken peru 6.jpg a fifth, but apparently she's in Peru, not Bolivia, this time.
And in other images:
- File:Crouching female on field Peru.jpg This is actually a different photo
- File:Crouching woman in art Peru.jpg is a photo
- File:Vrouw in Peru met jurk als toilet en poncho.jpg does not show face
- File:Squatting woman with child in Bolivia.jpg same image as above
- File:Peruvian depriced city area.jpg same location?
- File:Sitting person in a third world country.jpg a third shot apparently from this location.
- File:Crouching woman Bolivia.jpg a fourth. The impression that the photographer was lurking photographing each woman that came along is creepy.
- File:Crouching woman and child Peru.jpg possibly the same location
- File:Crouching woman Peru.jpg subject seems resentful
- File:Indian woman in Peru crouching near her alpacas.jpg possibly
- and possibly these: File:Crouching woman Indonesia in art.jpg File:Old woman crouching in grass.jpg File:Crouching old female Indonesia.jpg
These two (both the same shot) show a girl apparently laughing at the photographer from a small concrete enclosure with half-height walls, described in the metadata as a toilet; she may be washing at a tap? Since the photographer apparently considered this photo sexual, consent is dubious.
There are also photos with other-marking captions, stating that subjects are of a different gender or ethnicity from the photographer and frequently little else. A few examples, some of which may need deleting on other grounds:
- File:Girl and people in church Jerusalem.jpg
- File:Black man are good runners.JPG
- File:Presumably Ethopische monk Israel.JPG
- File:Antje Montero as ladyspeaker.jpg
- File:Ladyspeaker and model during the fashionshow in Spijkenisse.JPG
- File:Blonde mannequin met een ladyspeaker met zijn microfoon Spijkenisse.jpg
- File:Hele lange catwalk op de voorstraat in Spijkenisse met een ladyspeaker.jpg
- File:Dark groom and his bride Kandy Sri Lanka.JPG
- File:Two running women different nationalities.JPG
- File:Donkere vrouw hardlopen marathon.JPG
- File:Two running asian females marathond.JPG
- File:Running asian woman marathon.JPG
- File:Hindustani woman.jpg
- File:Girl and children in Thailand.jpg
- File:Black and white woman running.JPG
- File:Running dark couple marathon.JPG
I am concerned about some of the uploader's attitudes, especially in light of photos showing the photographer teaching.
These images were all uploaded by User:Toilet. I believe they should be deleted, for the same reasons as the precedents for deleting this users' photos. Consent is dubious, legality may be (for instance, in the Netherlands, there is a right to privacy, especially in sexual contexts, againstphotos taken in public places). And the encyclopedic value is pretty low, too.
Apologies for the files I have missed and any I have re-nominated for deletion by mistake. There are lots of other problematic files from this user, I am trying to rename or delreq them all. Any help is very welcome. Frankly, I wish this user had never uploaded anything; the value of the images is offset by the burden on other editors to do all this. HLHJ (talk) 05:11, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment This guy, again. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 11:49, 26 January 2021 (UTC)