Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/02/08
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 02:05, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope, unused personal image Julo (talk) 11:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Also including: File:Casablanca, Morocco (8141922136).jpg
COM:FOP#Morocco. 84.61.133.236 08:25, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Casablanca russavia (talk) 11:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal drawing, single upload from user, out of COM:PS. Funfood ␌ 10:57, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal drawing Julo (talk) 11:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
je ne suis pas l auteur de la photo Georgiosiravos (talk) 10:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Yann Morning ☼ (talk) 01:29, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
out of scope. Microsoft word file format (.doc) is not allowed. McZusatz (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by McZusatz Morning ☼ (talk) 01:29, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope: non notable person. BrightRaven (talk) 17:56, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Rusavia Morning ☼ (talk) 01:30, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope: non notable people BrightRaven (talk) 17:58, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Rusavia Morning ☼ (talk) 01:30, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
We have the Palestinian flag in SVG, no need for this. Fry1989 eh? 23:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Rusavia Morning ☼ (talk) 01:30, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
No FoP for sculptures in the USA Morning ☼ (talk) 04:42, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I uploaded it and thought it was Skagway in Canada, oops. Change to speedy if that is easier.--Canoe1967 (talk) 07:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Delete Statue is in Alaska. --Leoboudv (talk) 03:20, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Morocco. 84.61.133.236 11:45, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: As per nom, no FOP in Morocco russavia (talk) 13:57, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Copyright vio. Rapsar (talk) 23:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 18:26, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
I don't want to see this picture of me on the internet Anonyams (talk) 00:57, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Note, I have added a speedy deletion tag to this, as it seems to fall squarely under Commons:Deletion policy#Privacy. Storkk (talk) 16:29, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:00, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 01:46, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Out of project scope, unused. Not educational. -- Magister Mathematicae 04:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Out of project scope. ALE! ¿…? 08:55, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:39, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned, no useful description, appears to be a personal photo, out of scope. Dcoetzee (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:40, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gerry_roger.jpg Aldercass (talk) 15:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:41, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Mis-licensed. This is a TV screen grab Andy Dingley (talk) 15:43, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 17:41, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Mis-licensed. This is a TV screen grab Andy Dingley (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Per above. The locomotive character from the series "Chuggington" aired on Disney Junior. Fma12 (talk) 23:25, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 17:41, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:43, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:46, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio: http://cronicasmacaenses.com/2012/11/17/felipe-nasr-comenta-o-circuito-da-guia-em-macau/ Cs-wolves(talk) 23:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 17:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
copyvio: http://gridreversal.wordpress.com/2011/09/05/felipe-nasr-2011-british-f3-champion/ Cs-wolves(talk) 23:45, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 17:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
This file, since the target page was deleted in an AfD, is not used anywhere. Is this file out of scope? Francisco (talk) 00:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Possibly the one deleted at w:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 January 16#File:RamDarbarOrchha.jpg. In either case, the age of the mural is unknown. Stefan4 (talk) 01:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Possibly the one deleted at w:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 January 16#File:RamDarbarOrchhaThumb.jpg. In either case, the age of the mural is unknown. Stefan4 (talk) 01:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Orphan image was uploaded for the sole purpose to POV push on en. WP as seen: w:Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wyndham Bonnet Creek Premiere Resort and here. Not only was this uploaded with malicious intent, it has no true encyclopedic value. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Side note, the uploader (and his sockpuppets at EN.WP) have been blocked as vandalism only accounts. Thought I would list that information here as this photo is part of that vandalism. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 04:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Orphan image was uploaded for the sole purpose to POV push on en. WP as seen: w:Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wyndham Bonnet Creek Premiere Resort and here. Not only was this uploaded with malicious intent, it has no true encyclopedic value. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Side note, the uploader (and his sockpuppets at EN.WP) have been blocked as vandalism only accounts. Thought I would list that information here as this photo is part of that vandalism. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 04:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Orphan image was uploaded for the sole purpose to POV push on en. WP as seen: w:Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wyndham Bonnet Creek Premiere Resort and here. Not only was this uploaded with malicious intent, it has no true encyclopedic value. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Side note, the uploader (and his sockpuppets at EN.WP) have been blocked as vandalism only accounts. Thought I would list that information here as this photo is part of that vandalism. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 04:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Orphan image was uploaded for the sole purpose to POV push on en. WP as seen: w:Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wyndham Bonnet Creek Premiere Resort and here. Not only was this uploaded with malicious intent, it has no true encyclopedic value. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Side note, the uploader (and his sockpuppets at EN.WP) have been blocked as vandalism only accounts. Thought I would list that information here as this photo is part of that vandalism. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 04:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Orphan image was uploaded for the sole purpose to POV push on en. WP as seen: w:Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wyndham Bonnet Creek Premiere Resort and here. Not only was this uploaded with malicious intent, it has no true encyclopedic value. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Side note, the uploader (and his sockpuppets at EN.WP) have been blocked as vandalism only accounts. Thought I would list that information here as this photo is part of that vandalism. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 04:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Orphan image was uploaded for the sole purpose to POV push on en. WP as seen: w:Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wyndham Bonnet Creek Premiere Resort and here. Not only was this uploaded with malicious intent, it has no true encyclopedic value. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Side note, the uploader (and his sockpuppets at EN.WP) have been blocked as vandalism only accounts. Thought I would list that information here as this photo is part of that vandalism. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 04:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Previously deleted at w:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 December 20#File:Sarah Morris.jpg for having an insufficient OTRS permission. Stefan4 (talk) 01:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Pre-existing SVG at File:British-White-Ensign-1707.svg Fry1989 eh? 02:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Neutral This was an image I transfered out of the move-to-Commons backlog on English Wikipedia. I have no strong feelings to either keep or delete it. Michael Barera (talk) 02:56, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Almost identical to File:Lisboa (P), 2011. (5925867288).jpg. (Which is “better”?) -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:40, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, this was a mistake — these two photos are different enough (notice Waldo stepping off the tram at the right side). -- Tuválkin ✉ 01:30, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. Yann (talk) 18:57, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
The stamp is under copyright still in Turkey. See: Commons:Deletion requests/File:KoreanWarpostalstampTC.jpg. Takabeg (talk) 03:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Source (File:Gara Garayev, Dmitri Shostakovich, Irina Shostakovich.jpg) was deleted. Takabeg (talk) 05:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, but no Freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan and the monument is certainly copyrighted and was erected after 1982. A.Savin 13:09, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:19, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Based on the timestamp and the tags on the Flickr page that this image came from, the filename and the photo description are inaccurate. This photo was actually taken during Super Bowl XLIII in February 2009, not during the power outage during Super Bowl XLVII earlier this week. I'm not sure what it depicts, since the Flickr page does not provide much information, so it may not be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Thoughts? Zzyzx11 (talk) 06:57, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not legitimately in use and falls out of the Scope of Commons. It is a photo of the Super Bowl XLIII halftime show of Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band. I can tell this by zooming on the blue letters under or behind the goalposts its says Bruce Springsteen and its time stamp is Feb 1st 2009 which is the date of Super Bowl XLIII and Bruce Springsteen did do the Super Bowl XLIII halftime show on that date. Its not really good enough to add to that super bowl page.Theworm777 (talk) 00:24, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Rename Thanks for catching the discrepancy. I found it from an article on the outage. I apologize for overlooking the details.Keep. The image has been renamed and caption updated to reflect what we actually know about the image thus far. An inquiry to the photographer might result in more information. While I don't have a specific plan for the image now, someone looking to include pictures related to the game might well appreciate it. -- Ke4roh (talk) 19:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Hoax; see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:List_of_hoaxes_on_Wikipedia#Nagoochee_Frog TenPoundHammer (talk) 07:53, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Kept: In use, no reason to delete. Yann (talk) 19:01, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
No evidence that this photo was release in the public domain. Lpdrew (talk) 08:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
I am filing this DR to Keep this Image. Why? This image was taken on February 2, 2010 and uploaded here at a very high resolution February 3, 2010. Secondly the resolution on Commons is much higher than the one available on flickr So, its most likely own work by uploader as the uploader claims and the uploader and flickr account owner are the same people. Leoboudv (talk) 08:01, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Comment: I should note that this uploader licensed his flickr pictures freely in the past such as this and this image. Today, he has had a change of view and places a non-Commercial restriction but I think its safe to say that the uploader is the flickr account owner here. --Leoboudv (talk) 03:02, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Higher res image here, more than reasonable to assume both users are the same Denniss (talk) 23:20, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Published here before publication at Flickr and the "picture date". I think this is a Flickrwashing. Lymantria (talk) 08:35, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per flickrwash --Leoboudv (talk) 09:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation of the work by a graphist Remi Mathis (talk) 08:50, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small files with no EXIF and own work claims are doubtful. This file should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Takabeg (talk) 09:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small files with no EXIF and own work claims are doubtful. This file should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Takabeg (talk) 09:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small files with no EXIF and self claims are doubtful. This file should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Takabeg (talk) 09:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small files with no EXIF and own work claims are doubtful. This file should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Takabeg (talk) 09:25, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small files with no EXIF and own work claims are doubtful. This file should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Takabeg (talk) 09:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- This picture is personnal work. It's useless and stupid to delete it. --Trbz1461 (talk) 16:42, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small files with no EXIF and own work claims are doubtful. This file should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Takabeg (talk) 09:31, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- This picture is personnal work ! Please do not remove it ! --Trbz1461 (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Old enough. No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 19:03, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small files with no EXIF and own work claims are doubtful. This file should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Takabeg (talk) 09:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Armenia. The Government House of Armenia was designed by Alexander Tamanian (1878-1936) and Gevorg Tamanian (1910-93).
- File:Erevan - Armenia (2906603237).jpg
- File:Yerewan Place of the Republic 2.jpg
- File:Yerevan by Danghula.JPG
- File:Plaza Republica de noche.JPG
- File:Musical fountains, Yerevan (5052429930).jpg
- File:Republic Square, Yerevan, Armenia.jpg
- File:Yerevan night square1.jpg
- File:Plaza Republica Yeravan 2.JPG
- File:Yerevan square by Rita W.jpg
Takabeg (talk) 11:50, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Qualitätsmängel, verschwommen 84.58.133.101 12:35, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion Morning ☼ (talk) 10:50, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
It looks as if this is the same drawing as here, so I assume that this isn't own work by the uploader as claimed. Stefan4 (talk) 13:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Copyright issues, it belongs to this set of deleted files: Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_of_User:Fz22 but it was missed from deletion then Iaaasi (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
This is a photo of paintings at a museum in Arles. Unfortunately, France doesn't have freedom of panorama for paintings temporarily displayed inside a museum. Stefan4 (talk) 14:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Not two-dimensional at all. PD-art does not apply. FA2010 (talk) 14:43, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
falsche Datei hochgeladen MannheimBusinessSchool (talk) 16:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Morning ☼ (talk) 10:51, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
falsche Datei hochgeladen MannheimBusinessSchool (talk) 16:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Morning ☼ (talk) 10:51, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Copyright vio. Rapsar (talk) 16:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:08, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:49, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:49, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belgium. 84.61.133.236 17:05, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Comment: Should be undeleted with the part of the Atomium cropped away. --84.61.162.86 09:58, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- Why the hell is this deleted? No way COM:FOP has anything to do with this. This should be undeleted.-178.118.104.124 20:52, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Rabe! as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The depicted person wants the deletion, I , as the author of this image, support this wish since there is a more recent and more appropriate portrait photo of this person, e.g. used in his German biography article de:Marcel Hattendorf Yann (talk) 17:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
It is currently in use, so. Yann (talk) 17:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Keep- OK, not in use now. Yann (talk) 10:53, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Please delete, it is a wish of me as the author and a wish of the depicted person. There is a more recent image already uploaded. --Rabe! (talk) 17:54, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- There is no reasonable point not to delete the photograph. It´s a living person and of course we have to pay respect as to her wish.--Mehlauge (talk) 18:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete -- Kilomoto (talk) 08:57, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- I think that we should respect the will of the person depicted. Therefore, Delete. (BTW: The image is not in use.) --ALE! ¿…? 09:19, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
This unit was formed around 1985, so the design of the badge is still protected by Crown Copyright. De728631 (talk) 17:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
It appears this may be mistaken identify, so subject is unknown Sphilbrick (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Undated flag of Brazilian municipality founded in 1986 (see also "1986" in image), failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) prior to 1983." Grabbed from http://www.madalena.ce.gov.br/portal1/municipio/hino_brasao.asp?iIdMun=100123104# = .jpg (last modified: 2012) Gunnex (talk) 20:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- related: File:02 sendbinary (1).jpg (coat of arms).Gunnex (talk) 20:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't notice the year in the flag when I uploaded a bigger version of the the image. I guess we have no choice but deleting it. --Jonund (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nikbot as no license (no license). The uploader added a FAL license afterwards. ut I highly doubt that this is realy own work. JuTa 20:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:16, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
regrettably, Ukraine has no Freedom of Panorama. DS (talk) 22:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- On second thought, I'm not sure this passes the threshold of originality. DS (talk) 22:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Nothing original enough. Yann (talk) 19:17, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Ukraine has no freedom of panorama DS (talk) 22:13, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
I made a mistake Vhorvat (talk) 22:20, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No file uploaded Lymantria (talk) 10:18, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Ukraine has no freedom of panorama; Yevgeny Vuchetich died in 1974, so photos of his Motherland Monument can only be free in 2044 DS (talk) 22:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
ukraine has no freedom of panorama; Yevgeny Vuchetich died in 1974, so this will not be free until 2044 DS (talk) 22:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Ukraine has no freedom of panorama; Yevgeny Vuchetich died in 1974, so photos of his Motherland Monument cannot be free until 2044 DS (talk) 22:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Ukraine has no freedom of panorama; Yevgeny Vuchetich died in 1974, so photos of his Motherland Monument cannot be free until 2044 DS (talk) 22:29, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United StatesRussia A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- (or in Russia, you mean) DS (talk) 05:58, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- yeah, my bad. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as de minimis. The darkness of the image makes this statue not immediately identifiable without the context of the name. Compare the first category of acceptable images under COM:DM. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:57, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. Ruthven (msg) 05:53, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Ukraine has no freedom of panorama; Yevgeny Vuchetich died in 1974, so photos of his Motherland Monument cannot be free until 2044 DS (talk) 22:29, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Ukraine has no freedom of panorama; Yevgeny Vuchetich died in 1974, so photos of his Motherland Monument cannot be free until 2044 DS (talk) 22:29, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Ukraine has no freedom of panorama; Yevgeny Vuchetich died in 1974, so photos of his Motherland Monument cannot be free until 2044 DS (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- I did not know that. If that is true it should obviously be deleted together with all images in Category:Monument to the Motherland, Kiev. Ainali (talk) 07:02, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Seattle City Council ≠ PD-USgov. X-Weinzar (talk) 22:35, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not US GOV PumpkinSky talk 03:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Seattle City Council ≠ PD-USgov. X-Weinzar (talk) 22:35, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not US GOV PumpkinSky talk 03:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Seattle City Council ≠ PD-USgov. X-Weinzar (talk) 22:35, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: not US GOV PumpkinSky talk 03:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. The better version can be found even in a blog. {{PD-self}} claim is doubtful. Takabeg (talk) 23:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:26, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
I am unable to validate the license on Flickr, as the link results in "This member is no longer active on Flickr". The EXIF metadata cites copyright holder as "The Boeing Company 2006". – Wdchk (talk) 23:49, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Boeing Dreamscape was an official stream from Boeing Company as part of the 787 promotions during the 2010 Expo in Shanghai. russavia (talk) 23:51, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Kept: as per russavia. Yann (talk) 19:27, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
No scope, no use. Fry1989 eh? 23:51, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
No scope, no use. Fry1989 eh? 23:51, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
No scope, no use. Fry1989 eh? 23:52, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
No scope, no use. Fry1989 eh? 23:53, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Non-free logo Banfield - Amenazas aquí 15:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Yep, its free. We've created it. D4NiMG (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 07:45, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Needs more work to be done to it. VentiMan (talk) 22:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 07:46, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Derivated work of a non-free free work. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 10:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Perdona pero desconocía eso. Hay una licencia adecuada? Es solo un cartel en la vía pública. --Gastón Cuello (talk) 17:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no Freedom of Panorama in Argenitina for such images. JuTa 00:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hérsonildo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvios.
- File:Bruna-Marquezine.jpg
- File:Alexandre Neromúsico.jpg
- File:Leticiaspiller-1.jpg
- File:LeticiaSpiller2012.jpg
- File:Juliano-cazarreator.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 00:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:DW.
- File:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles TV and DVD Player.jpg
- File:PS1 Flightstick and Dual Analog set.jpg
- File:Pink Floyd Pulse CD Set - LED Earlier Larger Edition Versus Later Smaller Release.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 02:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 14:49, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shiva Vid Shukla (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal image, out of scope
Morning ☼ (talk) 08:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:37, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shiva Vid Shukla (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:38, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Isuru Anjana Jayasekara. I-A-J-Z (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal image, out of scope
- File:This is oe of my own works.JPG
- File:Siaz9.JPG
- File:SiaZ .jpg
- File:Siaz'.jpg
- File:Siaz.jpg
- File:Siaz VEVO.JPG
- File:SiaZ.jpg
- File:327755 268935296460219 100000312532803 941246 1859122212 o (2).jpg
Morning ☼ (talk) 08:31, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:38, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Files look like not own works. Photos have low resolution, images are old black and white photos or book covers.
- File:Ivan Prihodko semya 2.jpg
- File:Ivan Prihodko kniga 2 2.jpg
- File:Oblochka Prihodko 2.jpg
- File:Oblochka Prihodko.jpg
- File:Ivan Prihodko kniga.jpg
- File:Ivan Prihodko kniga 2.jpg
- File:Prihodko Vladimir 3.jpg
- File:Prihodko Vladimir 2.jpg
- File:Prihodko Vladimir.jpg
- File:Prihodko Ivan 3.JPG
- File:Prihodko vladimir 1.jpg
- File:Prihodko prohodnaya 3.jpg
- File:Prihodko semya 2.jpg
- File:Ivan Prihodko semya.jpg
- File:Ivan Prihodko.JPG
- File:Иван Митрофанович Приходько.jpg
Anatoliy (talk) 16:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sluchajniy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Honda CB1300SF 2011.jpg
- File:2010-honda-cb1300s-c-abs.jpg
- File:Honda CB1300ST 2009.jpg
- File:Honda CB1300SFA 2006.jpg
- File:Honda CB1300SF 2001.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sluchajniy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images taken from internet, creator occasionally credited with no evidence of permission for reuse. Couple of obvious promo shots.
- File:Honda-cb-1300-super-touring-2012.jpeg
- File:Cb1300 2012.jpg
- File:Honda-CB1100-static2.jpg
- File:Honda CB 1300 SF by efsport Racing Products.jpg
- File:Honda CB 1300 by Power Builder 01.jpg
- File:Cb1300rr l.jpg
- File:Honda CB 1300 Super Touring 2012 01.jpg
- File:CB1300 2003.jpg
- File:Gsx1400.jpg
- File:Kawasaki-zrx-1200-s-03.jpg
- File:Yamaha-xjr-1300-ld3.jpg
- File:Cb1300s013.JPG
- File:Honda CB1300 SC40.jpg
- File:CB 1300 FW FX FY(SC40)(import) 98-00 1.jpg
moogsi (blah) 01:20, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Delete Hindustanilanguage (talk) 10:58, 21 February 2013 (UTC).
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Photos uploaded by EllMisterM
[edit]- File:Romarinho.png
- File:Emerson (Corinthians).png
- File:Cassio-Ramos.png
- File:Chicão (Corinthians).png
- File:Douglas (Corinthians).png
- File:Chen-ZhiZhao.PNG
Images in very low quality and resolution, without EXIF. Looks like a screencaps. --Oleola (talk) 16:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RobertoValdésSuárez1996 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted:
Files uploaded by RobertoValdésSuárez1996 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP (considering user´s talk page).
Gunnex (talk) 19:53, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
The file was nominated for speedy deletion with the reason derivative work which uses the copyrighted, non-free, logo of Pirelli , I changed the speedy in a normal DR to get more input. Huib talk 08:54, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete Unlike File:Kit_body_inter0910h.png, which was kept, there's precious little here apart from the logo. I think, effectively, this is a picture of the logo. --Simonxag (talk) 15:38, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- But the logo is {{PD-text}}, so I see no issue here either. Keep. –Tryphon☂ 02:40, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Not only is the logo pure text, it's also barely recognizable in this image: if "effectively, this is a picture of the logo", as Simonxag asserts above, it would seem to be about the worst possible picture of the logo imaginable. This seems definitely de minimis to me. (Also, if the logo were considered significant enough to make this image non-free, it would be more reasonable to replace it with the plain colored bars from one of the earlier versions than to delete the image entirely.) —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 23:37, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept. If someone can copyright a couple pixels we really are in trouble. Rocket000 (talk) 23:57, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Cloudz679 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: unnecessary display of sponsor logos Yann (talk) 16:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with the nominator, but as the previous DR was closed as kept, I reopen the discussion.
- To me, this is either out of scope, or a copyvio. If it is acceptable just because it is very small, then it is a kind of fair use rationale, and this is not accepted on Commons. Yann (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- For me it is quite clearly the "Pirelli" logo, which is a copyrighted image and would therefore be "fair-use" which is not allowed on Commons. Looking at the file history I think it would be perfectly acceptable to keep the title as is, revert to a previous logo-free version and delete the version history where the logo exists. Cloudz679 (talk) 23:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- The rationale at this deletion request seems to be adequate in this case. Cloudz679 (talk) 20:15, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- For me it is quite clearly the "Pirelli" logo, which is a copyrighted image and would therefore be "fair-use" which is not allowed on Commons. Looking at the file history I think it would be perfectly acceptable to keep the title as is, revert to a previous logo-free version and delete the version history where the logo exists. Cloudz679 (talk) 23:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep as per the last time, the display of "The Pirelli" and "Nike" logos are de minimis (if they are even eligible for copyright protection in the first place). LightGreenApple talk to me 21:45, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- If the logos are acceptable, I don't see why this should be so small. Yann (talk) 19:10, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Photos uploaded by EllMisterM
[edit]- File:Romarinho.png
- File:Emerson (Corinthians).png
- File:Cassio-Ramos.png
- File:Chicão (Corinthians).png
- File:Douglas (Corinthians).png
- File:Chen-ZhiZhao.PNG
Images in very low quality and resolution, without EXIF. Looks like a screencaps. --Oleola (talk) 16:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RobertoValdésSuárez1996 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted:
Files uploaded by RobertoValdésSuárez1996 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP (considering user´s talk page).
Gunnex (talk) 19:53, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AdeelTariq0 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:43, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Dosquebradas, colombia.jpg
- File:Albania.jpg
- File:Arabia.jpg
- File:Carrefour en la isla Nueva Caledonia.jpg
- File:Local de Carrefour en Argentina.jpg
- File:Carrefour en Qian shan Road, Shushan District, Hefei (China).jpg
- File:Carrefour Wuyi en Changzhou, China.jpg
- File:Franquicia Carrefour City en Francia.jpg
- File:Carrefour Colosseum en Bucarest, Rumania.jpg
- File:Reapertura de Carrefour en Salta, Argentina en 2011.jpg
- File:Incendio en Carrefour Salta (Argentina) en abril de 2011.jpg
- File:Carrefour Planet Paderno Dugnano en Milan, Italia.png
- File:Carrefour en Tahiti, Poliinesia.jpg
- File:Carrefour en East Java. Indonesia.JPG
- File:Carrefour Drive en Francia.jpg
- File:Apertura del primer Carrefour en Irak en abril de 2010.jpg
- File:Carrefour Altos del Prado en Barranquilla, Colombia.jpg
- File:Carrefour Express sucursal Metro 127 en Bogotá, Colombia.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios. Yann (talk) 22:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
(Nomination for Uno card game related material)
Probable copyright violations. User already uploaded File:Master uno.jpg which had a watermark, and upon checking some (such as "uno moo.jpg" and "uno tippo.jpg"), they were in use on Amazon.com. No EXIF details, and given (lack of) quality of user's other obviously "home shot" box shots- which clearly *are* his/her own as they're typical put-on-carpet-and-snapped-with-flash amateur quality- these high-quality ones are near-certain copyvios.
Given the aforementioned watermarked copyvio, these ones do *not* warrant the benefit of the doubt.
- File:UNO Power Grab.jpg
- File:UNO Tippo.jpg
- File:UNO moo.jpg
- File:UNO Dice.jpg
- File:UNO-Roboto.jpg
- File:Uno attack.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 15:31, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
(Further nomination for just about everything else)
Another nomination for this user. In this case, these files were all uploaded *after* a previous Feb 2013 bulk nomination (in that case all the nominated images were deleted due to dubious variance in sizes, EXIF details and styles that pointed towards questionable legitimacy).
This appears to be the same problem. User has already uploaded some "Uno" card game related material (nominated elsewhere) that appears to be near-certain copyvios, including at least one watermarked image.
In this case, the very low-res File:Maxicol.jpg is available at *much* higher resolution here (not guaranteed proof of a copyvio- he/she *may* have intentionally only licensed a low-res version to Commons and used a higher-res version elsewhere- but usually a strong indicator). Aside from the variance in sizes, EXIF et al, there is also the fact that these store shots come from all over the world (including Europe and South America).
Basically, there is no absolute *proof* that the majority of these are copyvios, but given that the user has already uploaded blatant copyvios, already had many uploads deleted for that reason (and long before these ones were uploaded) and been warned beforehand, I think all fall within the "significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file" and should be deleted under the precautionary principle.
IMHO, the user should also be blocked as well.
- File:Carrefour en 2013.jpg
- File:Marocmaxi.jpg
- File:Maxicol.jpg
- File:Brasilatacadao.jpg
- File:Atacadao arg fachada.jpg
- File:Falargen.jpg
- File:Titanfalabe.jpg
- File:Falabella-suba.jpg
- File:FALABELLA PERU.jpg
- File:Falabella cartagena.jpg
- File:Calimaarmeniahc.jpg
- File:Manizales hc.jpg
- File:Carrefour Chipre.jpg
- File:Carrefour Bulgaria.jpg
- File:Carrefour Belgica.jpg
- File:Carrefour Avenida Duarte, Republica Dominicana.jpg
- File:Carrefour en Guyana Francesa.jpg
- File:Carrefour Guadeloupe.png
- File:Carrefour Brasil.jpg
- File:Carrefour en Argentina.jpg
- Compare; this higher resolution (not just upscaled) version of same file. Might not be original source (watermark would had to have been removed), but shows it exists.
- File:Americas easy.jpeg
- File:Avellanedaeasy.jpg
- File:Almagro2easy.jpg
- File:Makrolatam.jpg
- File:Venzmakro.jpg
- File:Makrotunja.jpg
- File:Makropakist.jpg
- File:Makro calisur.jpg
- File:La-polar2CENTROMAYOR.jpg
- File:Sodimac-peru.jpg
- Compare; Higher resolution version
- File:Sodimac1arge.jpg
- File:HC chiloeCHILE.jpg
- File:Cencosud en el mundo.png
Ubcule (talk) 16:05, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheChillFlight (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like collection of promo/fan photos, not own work.
- File:Netsky2012DJ.jpg
- File:Alesso2012.jpg
- File:AxwellPhoto2012.jpg
- File:SteveAngelloPhoto2012.jpg
- File:SebastianIngrossoPhotoshoot2012.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:45, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Argentina viva (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Gimnasio almagro.jpg
- File:Gieco.jpg
- File:Estadio almagro.jpg
- File:Futbol5 almagro.jpg
- File:Nido aguilas.jpg
- File:Plantel almagro2002.jpg
- File:Almagro liga a.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:45, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:45, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eduardoabs (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Ashley Madison Carnaval.jpg
- File:Ashley Madison Logo.jpg
- File:Programa do Pânico.jpg
- File:Eduardo Borges.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Text-only images which could be replaced with math mark-up.
- File:Baby script.png
- File:Sample Eq.png
- File:Global.png
- File:Bigglobal.png
- File:Exfordays.png
- File:Leq.png
- File:Nxxmatrix.png
- File:Kegmatrices.png
- File:Keeq.png
- File:Ke.png
- File:G Matrix.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:54, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gemaylonen11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:54, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Postmarke04 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. No evidence of permission from painter.
- File:Briefträger im Bad.jpg
- File:Briefträger im Atelier.jpg
- File:Besetzt 1947.jpg
- File:Besetzt 1942.jpg
- File:Der Hilfspostbote Säbelbein.jpg
- File:Eisenbahnzug 1843.jpg
- File:Titelseite "Berliner Humor" 1950.jpg
- File:Hier habe ick Steen gekloppt 1953.jpg
- File:Der Ende vom Anfang 1945.jpg
- File:Russischer Soldat 1945.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:57, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Info OTRS permission received.--Wdwd (talk) 18:13, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 5ta Calle producciones (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos and album covers. I think copyrights holder confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:At&t Center san antonio texas.jpg
- File:Karim Zomar Despierta Ep.png
- File:Despierta Ep Karim zomar.png
- File:Karim zomar.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios. Yann (talk) 17:48, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Same file as here but lower quality Teoamez (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 13:51, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
ukraine has no freedom of panorama DS (talk) 22:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 13:52, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nikbot as no license (no license). Is this realy a NASA image? The source page names it "LROC". JuTa 19:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- LROC is an abbreviation for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera and The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) is a NASA robotic spacecraft currently orbiting the Moon on a low 50 km polar mapping orbit. Consequently it is NASA image Андрей Щербаков (talk) 06:50, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- China, India, the European space agency, Japan and the Soviet/Russian pioneers have all sent probes to the moon and taken photographs. Surely this is likely to be a NASA image based solely on availability of images, but it is still not sourced and not a popular easy to find image on the net. Penyulap ☏ 03:59, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing adequate source information FASTILY (TALK) 22:24, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Unlike other dubious sports recognitions such as the Mendoza Line, there are no reputable sources that mentions a Bzdelik Zone. This term (and the graph that demonstrates this term) is obviously a creation of a frustrated fan instead of a respected journalist. Thomsonmg2000 (talk) 15:56, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 22:22, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belgium. 84.61.133.236 17:01, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Parts of Atomium in the foreground might simply be cropped away. --Túrelio (talk) 14:59, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
- Crop out the Atomium and Keep the street scene. 67.87.46.39 19:12, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I'd suggest to crop out the Atomium in such a way that a small part remains visible (de minimis), so the "view from Atomium" part will not be completely lost. Gestumblindi (talk) 02:04, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep What a ridicolius case. Of course this is not a COM:FOP#Belgium-case since the Atomium is not dispict. Only a very small part of it and that's OK according to COM:FOP#Belgium (which is bullshit anyway).--__ wɘster 18:39, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Not a ridiculous case, since most of the atomium is depicted and clearly recognizable (which is what counts), partly as reflection in the sphere at the bottom of the image. Cropping the image seems a good suggestion, but note that the original file will remain accessible through the file's history, so strictly speaking it's not a solution. Also note that the "bullshit"-discussion belongs in Belgian parliament, not here on commons. I'll upload a cropped version and notify the photographer/uploader later today, and hope the file can be kept. Jahoe (talk) 13:43, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Cropped and notified uploader now. Jahoe (talk) 14:15, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ukexpat as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: taken from http://www.kwillis.com/ Yann (talk) 20:51, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Moved from speedy by Yann seeing the comment on the talk page: This image is an image of me, Katherine Willis, and is owned by me, I have copyright rights to it, so it's totally appropriate for me to use it on Wikipedia and for general use. This image does appear on my website, www.kwillis.com, but it is on a number of other sites as well, including IMDb. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravenmcm71 (talk • contribs)
Moved from talk page: The image also appears on IMDb: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0932369/ and a number of other sites. I "am" Katherine Willis. I uploaded the photo. I own and have copyright rights to distribute the photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravenmcm71 (talk • contribs)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 22:23, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
The logo's are DW Huib talk 16:34, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Keep, the only logo that could be eligible for copyright is so tiny that I cannot even say what it is (so de minimis surely applies). The Pirelli and Nike logos are ineligible, as well as the Italian flag. –Tryphon☂ 17:53, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete DW. --Simo82 (talk) 11:46, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Keep That is not a logo- it's a small yellow splodge. J Milburn (talk) 21:03, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Keep I'm with the others in that I think it's too small to qualify as copyright-able. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 12:31, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
The file was nominated for speedy deletion with the reason derivative work which uses the copyrighted, non-free, logo of Pirelli , I changed the speedy in a normal DR to get more input. Huib talk 08:54, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - de minimis - Huib talk 08:57, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept. We already discussed this. Not only is it de minimis, but the Pirelli logo is {{PD-textlogo}} anyway. –Tryphon☂ 09:09, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Cloudz679 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: unnecessary display of sponsor logos Yann (talk) 16:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with the nominator, but as the previous DR was closed as kept, I reopen the discussion.
- To me, this is either out of scope, or a copyvio. If it is acceptable just because it is very small, then it is a kind of fair use rationale, and this is not accepted on Commons. Yann (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- For me it is quite clearly the "Pirelli" logo, which is a copyrighted image and would therefore be "fair-use" which is not allowed on Commons. Looking at the file history I think it would be perfectly acceptable to keep the title as is, revert to a previous logo-free version and delete the version history where the logo exists. Cloudz679 (talk) 23:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- The rationale at this deletion request seems to be adequate in this case. Cloudz679 (talk) 20:15, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- For me it is quite clearly the "Pirelli" logo, which is a copyrighted image and would therefore be "fair-use" which is not allowed on Commons. Looking at the file history I think it would be perfectly acceptable to keep the title as is, revert to a previous logo-free version and delete the version history where the logo exists. Cloudz679 (talk) 23:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep as the display of "The Pirelli" and "Nike" logos are de minimis (if they are even eligible for copyright protection in the first place). LightGreenApple talk to me 21:37, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- If the logos are acceptable, I don't see why this should be so small. Yann (talk) 19:10, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- This is also a case of "Not educationally useful" per Deletion Policy - "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality." Cloudz679 (talk) 21:55, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Funfood as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Advertising purpose. Yann (talk) 17:05, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- It seems to me this could be in scope if the copyright status is OK. Yann (talk) 17:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status FASTILY (TALK) 22:23, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Uploader claims to be the copyright holder, however uploader's username (also, en:User:Ulrichbecker on enWiki, who created the article on her) does not match the stated author "Simon Jutras". Confirmation of actual copyright holder's license should be given to OTRS if this is indeed cc-by-sa. Storkk (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Don't delete it. I got the photo from the subject of the article (Madeleine Monette) herself. Simon Jutras is a friend of her's. I willo ask her to get a written permission from him and then figure out how to do this on Commons. (I am not very familiar with these things, since I don't usually create articles on Wiki; but I will figure it out.) User:UlrichBecker
- Hi, Ulrich. It would be great it we could keep the photo! You can see steps needed here. Storkk (talk) 16:05, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 22:24, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted book cover Morning ☼ (talk) 08:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
I picked this part of the large wall of brochures it the travel agency where I work because these are all local companies that have given their premission to publish this image. I can send a confirmation of the email sent to these companies and their reply if needed. Hnefill ☼ (talk) 09:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 22:22, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
This logo may be copyrighted in the US, as the threshold is lower than in Germany. In addition, this image file has likely been created from http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Vorwerk_Logo.svg, though without crediting the author. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 22:22, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
SVG already exists at File:Windows logo - 2012.svg Fry1989 eh? 20:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 22:22, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
User Jacupus
[edit]All uploads by this user are blatant copyright violations. No license tag and the pictures are watermarked. Peace out, --84.167.120.5 22:52, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- When creating a deletion request, you need to tag the files and to inform the uploader. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:21, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 21:28, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Lisboa (P), 2011. (5925305973).jpg? Which is “better”? -- Tuválkin ✉ 01:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Image in scope and not a duplicate, but just two versions of the same image. We dont editorialize others projects about version of each image is "best" or "worst". Tm (talk) 20:18, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Almost identical to File:Lisboa (P), 2011. (5925867532).jpg. Which is “best”? -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:38, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Image in scope and not a duplicate, but just two versions of the same image. We dont editorialize others projects about version of each image is "best" or "worst". Tm (talk) 20:18, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Delfort as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyvio from the official logo of the en:Tour de France http://www.letour.fr/le-tour/2013/us/ Yann (talk) 16:13, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- This seems simple. OK or not? Yann (talk) 16:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Tell me if I'm wrong, but the copyrighted logo en:File:Tour de France logo.svg may qualify as fair use: Commons does not accept fair use media files. Where can we use this logo? it:Tour de_Granitas has been deleteted per non-notability... Thanks, --Delfort (talk) 07:59, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- It may be simple enough to be under {{PD-textlogo}}. Yann (talk) 19:08, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Maybe, BTW this file is unnecessary. --Delfort (talk) 23:21, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- It may be simple enough to be under {{PD-textlogo}}. Yann (talk) 19:08, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Tell me if I'm wrong, but the copyrighted logo en:File:Tour de France logo.svg may qualify as fair use: Commons does not accept fair use media files. Where can we use this logo? it:Tour de_Granitas has been deleteted per non-notability... Thanks, --Delfort (talk) 07:59, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
and File:Logo de Carrefour Rusia en 2009.gif
Not own work. Is this simple enough? Yann (talk) 22:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep From my opinion, the logo should not be deleted, but to change its tag to "PD-textlogo". Fma12 (talk) 23:22, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Object was built in 1936, author may not be dead before 1944.
Žiga (talk) 08:32, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete The author was Janez Gregorčič from Slovenska Vas. It is known that he broke his leg in 1962, therefore not eligible for Commons.[1] :) By the way, the correct year is 1945. --Eleassar (t/p) 14:39, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 00:18, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Later deleted:
Already deleted once; per COM:FOP#Slovenia. This hayrack has ornamental elements that make it special compared to other hayracks; that's why it has been described as the "author's achievement of the carpenter Janez Gregorčič... Without ornamental wood cuttings it would have been nothing special" [avtorski dosežek tesarja Janeza Gregorčiča... Brez okrasnih izrezov v lesu ne bi bil nič posebnega.][2] Eleassar (t/p) 10:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Also, File:Bistrica, Šentrupert - kozolec od daleč.jpg. Perhaps we could keep this one as the object of interest was the hayrack in its entirety and its usage, not its front side, which is difficult to see. --Eleassar (t/p) 10:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep It has already been undeleted (see COM:UNDEL arhiche for January 2013).
Furthermore, the hayrack was reportedly built in the first half of 19th century [3][4], so it is highly unlikely that the carpenter passed away after 1945.--Miha (talk) 17:59, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- Another source [5] (however, less reputable as Europeana or state founded DEDI) claims that this same hayrack was built in 20th century... --Miha (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- I really don't want to have incorrect information written in Commons and Wikipedia based on non-reliable sources, and this one is not a reliable academic source like I have cited above.
- The Europeana source is using DEDI as its reference. DEDI actually contains conflicting information: it first mentions the first half of the 19th century, but later states that it was erected in 1936 by the carpenter Janez Gregorčič, which is the correct information.[6]
- The Slovenian Registry of Cultural Heritage also states that the hayrack was built in 1936 by Janez Gregorčič.[7] As stated above, Janez Gregorčič was still alive in the 1960s.[8]
- The undeletion discussion[9] did not consider that the work has been described in reliable sources as an "author's achievement" due to the ornaments on its front side.[10] That's how it surpasses any potential threshold of originality and that's why the first image showing the front side should be deleted in my opinion, whereas the second should probably be kept as the photographer's (mine, actually) interest was elsewhere (the building and its usage). --Eleassar (t/p) 21:55, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- Another source [5] (however, less reputable as Europeana or state founded DEDI) claims that this same hayrack was built in 20th century... --Miha (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- It is questionable on what exactly this "author's achievement" reffers to. If you ask me, not as much to the ornaments themselves or their aestethics, but rather to the achievement in a strict construction sense (i.e. innovative carpeting methods; even nowadays you can hear radio reports that some tunnel will be built using some special Swiss drilling method developed by XY). Nevertheless, I hope we both agree that at least the second picture (File:Bistrica, Šentrupert - kozolec od daleč.jpg) is de minimis (it says hayrack from distance) and the ornaments are not seen in full, and therefore should be kept. --Miha (talk) 09:54, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
- The cited academic paper clearly states: "author's achievement of the carpenter Janez Gregorčič... Without ornamental wood cuttings it would have been nothing special" [avtorski dosežek tesarja Janeza Gregorčiča... Brez okrasnih izrezov v lesu ne bi bil nič posebnega.][11] The second image can be kept in my opinion. --Eleassar (t/p) 14:44, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted. Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons -FASTILY 09:36, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Janez (Janko) Gregorčič died on 20 November 1984. --Eleassar (t/p) 20:00, 10 June 2013 (UTC)