Jump to content

Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2009/12/15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 15th, 2009
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Passeig_de_Gràcia_Barcelona.jpg

[edit]

Failed flickr review twice. Once was within only 4 months of upload. No evidence this photo was ever free--ie. without a Non-Commercial restriction. Leoboudv (talk) 01:30, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by User:MBisanz. Sv1xv (talk) 04:35, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Sarah Marie Jones

[edit]

To keep it short: There is no use of these images. They can hardly be used for educational purpose; furthermore we have enough images in that style in our stock so we don't need 100 more of them. I guess that that kind of images are better off at flickr or something the like
--D-Kuru (talk) 03:09, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I see no reason to delete. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:12, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete There's no educational use here.--Prosfilaes (talk) 15:07, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep A number of these are artistically composed and well photographed, and some show no genitalia. Hardly blurry cel-phone genitalia snapshots which I generally support deleting. (Note: I have added a notice to the user's talk page alerting them to this discussion about deleting all their images.) Infrogmation (talk) 20:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. 2 deleted though (1 without a license, 1 duplicate) --:bdk: 00:00, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:David_Boreanaz_Purple_Bandana.jpg

[edit]

No useful educational purpose. SchuminWeb (talk) 03:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete could even be attack image. -- Deadstar (msg) 09:29, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Out of COM:SCOPE. Sv1xv (talk) 04:40, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bandera_del_Batallón_de_San_Blas.jpg

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete template. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 04:15, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept {{PD-Coa-Mexico}}. Sv1xv (talk) 04:39, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bandera_de_Guadalajara.jpg

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete template. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 04:16, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Bidgee (talk) 12:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bandeira_de_Curitiba.png

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete template. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 04:19, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Bidgee (talk) 12:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Antiguo_egipto_imperios_antiguo_y_nuevo.jpg

[edit]

There is no year of publication, so trying to find out if the image is PD will be very hard. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 04:25, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Have you even tried? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:19, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Question huh? Killiondude (talk) 07:28, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator is happily pressing the deletion button today, but makes no other effort at all. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, see user talk message here. –blurpeace (talk) 04:09, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've been away from the computer during christmas time, as Blurpeace says, there's no problem with removing this file. Actually, I should have proposed it for removal myself, for the image comes from a photocopy a teacher gave us while studying my career. So, I'm not even sure what its original source is. Excuse me and thank you for your maintenance labour!

Kind regards, --RedTony (talk) 16:21, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Azuebar_Alto_Palancia_cv.png

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 04:34, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Same for all files in Category:Maps of municipalities of Alto Palancia:
-- Common Good (talk) 20:51, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, without proper sourcing, there is no way to confirm these files are legitimately in the public domain. –blurpeace (talk) 06:27, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Barracas_Alto_Palancia_cv.png

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 04:39, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Azuebar Alto Palancia cv.png -- Common Good (talk) 20:53, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

deleted by Blurpeace --:bdk: 00:06, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bejis_Alto_Palancia_cv.png

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Azuebar Alto Palancia cv.png -- Common Good (talk) 20:53, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. –blurpeace (talk) 06:24, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Belgium_Brugge_tzand.jpg

[edit]

No assertion of who took the photo. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:03, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Clarified all information in standard template--LimoWreck (talk) 17:44, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 18:54, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Belgrade_1789.jpg

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. However, the year alone could make it PD. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:03, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Caption in the figure indicates a source. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:24, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep keep sourced Gwynhaden (talk) 15:56, 21 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Kept. Bidgee (talk) 12:49, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Benafer_Alto_Palancia_cv.png

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:08, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Azuebar Alto Palancia cv.png -- Common Good (talk) 20:53, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by User:Blurpeace -- Common Good (talk) 20:04, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Block_diagram.png

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:23, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Fix the tag. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:42, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. PD-ineligible --:bdk: 00:11, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bollard.jpg

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Own work, fix the tag. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:40, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 09:12, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brazil_Rio_Grande_do_Norte.png

[edit]

No indication of author. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:13, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Ask on the portuguese wikipedia if you want to know. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:04, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep - ineligible work. This request seems to be rather unwise. Julo (talk) 19:35, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The image is not a copyvio and it is a nice map Gwynhaden (talk) 21:27, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. ZooFari 08:57, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Argonne_logo.png

[edit]

Copyright violation. The colored triangle is unique art, which makes this a copyrightable logo. Multixfer (talk) 07:24, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Per nom., it is not just simple logo. Podzemnik (talk) 09:02, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Russian_Old_Believers_in_Nikolaevsk_AK_USA.jpg

[edit]

The uploader is a bureaucrat on Ukrainian wikipedia but I don't see any evidence this photo was free enough for Commons. I filed another DR here of images by him and they also failed flickr review within months of upload. Same situation as this case sadly. Leoboudv (talk) 07:43, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. The License on Flickr is now "Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic". MGA73 (talk) 22:19, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kaiane_Aldorino.jpg

[edit]

copyvio, AP photo 219.117.219.210 09:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Any source? --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 22:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
see the source description "图片来源: AP"[1]--221.127.248.111 08:30, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Copyvio RedCoat 20:18, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Provawiki525.jpg

[edit]

Unused test image. Out of scope. Pruneautalk 10:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Julo (talk) 19:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jícama.png

[edit]

Unused personal image. Out of scope. Pruneautalk 10:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Julo (talk) 19:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Imagem_4.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal image. Out of scope. Pruneautalk 10:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Poor quality, unused, personal image --> out of scope; Podzemnik (talk) 11:35, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HHC,_3rd_IBCT,_25th_ID_1SG.jpg

[edit]

One already exists. 164.66.192.21 10:50, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Duplicate here: File:First Sergeant Carl E. Howard.jpg. -- Deadstar (msg) 12:23, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Julo (talk) 19:28, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1SG_Howard.jpg

[edit]

This is a duplicate copy. 164.66.192.21 10:54, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Duplicate here: File:First Sergeant Carl E. Howard.jpg -- Deadstar (msg) 12:23, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Julo (talk) 19:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Divine_blackman_working_kitchen.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal (and maybe promotional, according to the description?) image. Out of scope. Pruneautalk 10:54, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Julo (talk) 19:25, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

----

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Semiologie.jpg

[edit]

Scan of a 1967 book cover. Uploader is not copyright holder, although it might qualify as PD-something as there is just text on the cover. -- Deadstar (msg) 14:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Hardly public domain, it is far from being just a plain text. Mormegil (talk) 23:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Minensucher Lindau freigestellt.JPG

[edit]

false title. alredy uploadet again --WerWil (talk) 16:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was the false Name of the Boat. The proper Name is File:Minensucher Weilheim freigestellt.JPG --WerWil (talk) 22:02, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. --:bdk: 17:43, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Natasha.jpg

[edit]

How do we know the uploader owns the rights to this image? It looks like a derivative copy of an image in a blue background. Leoboudv (talk) 05:57, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I think this violates character copyright of the Counter Strike game. (Look at the page where it's used). --Simonxag (talk) 23:56, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per Simonxag. Finn Rindahl (talk) 22:02, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. –Tryphon☂ 10:15, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Natasha.jpg

[edit]

Picture of the user, unused on the WMF project. Only contribution of this account, originally uploaded with a long out-of-scope, promotional text. Eusebius (talk) 16:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. --Podzemnik (talk) 11:37, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:VOC_logo.jpg

[edit]

Recent logo of a still existing organization which consits of more than just text. Robotje (talk) 17:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Funny parody of the old Dutch East India Company emblem, though... AnonMoos (talk) 18:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. no fair use on commons Huib talk 19:09, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TruchetVlakvullingbol.jpg

[edit]

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Kenmayer (talk) 17:49, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That image in *.svg would be better but this image could be used in en:Fractal for example --D-Kuru (talk) 06:50, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. ZooFari 09:04, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BaseballCards1987.jpg

[edit]

Deravative work, Topps owns the copyright to these baseball cards. Delete --Secret (talk) 18:38, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete copyrighted material -- Deadstar (msg) 09:36, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted COM:DW. Sv1xv (talk) 04:54, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mantis_devouring.jpg

[edit]

Where is the 'Explicit license at Flickr page'? There is nothing there at all on uploading this image to WikiCommons. This needs OTRS permission or a license change but none is forthcoming and the flickr license is 'All Rights Reserved.' So, Commons can't keep this photo, I believe. Leoboudv (talk) 20:44, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Many of the Flickr user's uploads, including the one just before this one, http://www.flickr.com/photos/alvarodriguez/194304045/in/photostream/, and the one right after, http://www.flickr.com/photos/alvarodriguez/222120810/in/photostream/, are CC-by-sa licensed. When the file was uploaded to Commons, FlickreviewR (talk · contribs) did not exist yet. The first FlickreviewR check was not performed until eight months after the file was uploaded here, at which time it failed. Personally, I'm inclined to believe the Commons uploader in this particular case. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep OK. This is reasonable enough. I, the nominator, withdraw my DR here and suggest that this image file be tagged with a "change of license" tag instead. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:23, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Per the above. Bidgee (talk) 00:53, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bendigo_talking_tram.jpg

[edit]

There is no indication of the author or source for this image. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 22:30, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Robert Merkel is likely the copyright owner given the high resolution. It has an obsolete license tag since it was uploaded 4.5 years ago but this can be corrected and is not a good reason for deletion. (like pd-author|Robert Merkel). Images uploaded 4-5 yrs ago did not need a pd-author claim and you are applying today's rules to them...which is quite unreasonable. The photo is certainly in scope too. --Leoboudv (talk) 03:48, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Keep and retag pd-self. -Nard the Bard 00:03, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Tagged with {{Robert Merkel}}. Bidgee (talk) 13:21, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Trailoftears.jpg

[edit]

Maybe public domain for some other reason, but not public domain for the reason selected at the moment as the license. The author Robert Lindneuy (1871-1970) not died >70 years ago. Wrong license or non-free. Martin H. (talk) 22:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. --:bdk: 17:54, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bunun_hunting.jpg

[edit]

scan work from 布農簡介221.127.140.169 02:06, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Killiondude (talk) 03:23, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alabama_map.jpg

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete template. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 04:23, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Source is given, fix the template if you must, not a reason to delete. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:16, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The only thing it says is transwikied from de.wikipedia. Can you see deleted pages on de.wikipedia, because I cannot. If you find something there, let us know. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Look again! /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Perry Castaneda Lib? User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:39, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Keep Gwynhaden (talk) 21:29, 21 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]
 Keep, source is given, with the given source information we can find http://lib.utexas.edu/maps/alabama.html where it is from - first map from the Geological Survey, 1972. Ill give the image a complete workaround on source, description and license. --Martin H. (talk) 12:07, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Martin H. (talk) 12:13, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bobover_Rebbe.jpg

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. The image on en.wikipedia also had no source. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I placed an information template on it and the original upload log. The image was uploaded without source to en.wp, regretably its hard now to find a (web) source for that image, a search only finds images taken from Wikipedia. Looking at the uploaders upload log shows, that he simply forgo to provide any sources with his uploads, questionable why this images where not questioned directly after upload but years later deleted for lack of sourcing. Regretably  Delete, no source. --Martin H. (talk) 12:56, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Killiondude (talk) 03:37, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hodynka.jpg

[edit]

A copyvio: author stated falsely, original author (mentioned in the watermark) did not permit usage (I contacted him personally). ssr (talk) 15:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Killiondude (talk) 03:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PikiWiki_Israel_6232_sister_cities_park_in_rishon_lezion.jpg

[edit]

No FOP for literary works in Israel. Not for maps either. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Killiondude (talk) 03:40, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Zionprime

[edit]

Zionprime uploaded some drawings. The image descriptions say "my novel" and "can be bought at:". I would say out of scope advertising. May can be reuploaded/undeleted when some book has an article in a WMF project. --D-Kuru (talk) 03:41, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I don't see any educational purpose. Seems like autopromotion. Julo (talk) 20:02, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Killiondude (talk) 03:33, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images of DarwinPeacock

[edit]

No evidence that these were taken with free software. Name of the application not given. Doubtful the program, or its output, is licensed under Creative Commons. –blurpeace (talk) 05:38, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep But, obviously, this should be a vector image. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please elaborate on your rationale? You didn't give a reason. –blurpeace (talk) 21:52, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What part of the output is the result of creativity on the part of the software authors? You cannot copyright just anything a program outputs, only fixed expression which came with the program in the first place, such as image icons. It doesn't look like it would matter if this was a free or commercial program. And if the user did not control the placement of the points, this may not be copyrightable at all.  Keep from the looks of it. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:45, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep There's no copyrightable part of the program here; just dots and lines connecting them, placed by algorithm. Is it copyrightable by the user? Well, I'm sure that a court wouldn't phrase the question this way, but there's maybe 50 dots there, each one connected or not to one of 49 other dots, which is equivalent, information-wise, to a 50x49 B&W picture, many of which would be clearly copyrightable. (I even cropped out and rescaled an image to 50x39 B&W to make sure that you could have something copyrightable at that size and bit-depth, and, yeah, you can.)--Prosfilaes (talk) 16:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Killiondude (talk) 03:35, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some "own work" images uploaded by User:Bijltjespad

[edit]

And then two that have Italian names/descriptions even though user is Dutch (not in itself a reason, but unusual) and there is no EXIF data on these fairly recent files. User has had one other file deleted as it was from http://www.comune.incisa-valdarno.fi.it/ , perhaps these are from there too.

All of the images user has uploaded have "self" licenses on them, the above are the more obvious "unlikely to be true" ones. Nominating them on basis of incorrect license and no source.

In a related note - There are also images taken from http://www.stationsweb.nl - a private collection of old photographs of railroad stations in the Netherlands. These images have no specific licensing on them, and the website claims none. However, user has uploaded here with a self license which is incorrect, but I'm not sure what it should be. See File:Station Oldenzaal E O.jpg for an example. -- Deadstar (msg) 16:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • If the user really took all these photos, including some taken 99 years ago (how old were you at the time you took these photos, and how old are you now?), U.S. jazz bands of the roaring 1920s, and European concentation camps of World War II, the user no doubt has a long and facinating life, and likely deserves a Wikipedia article themself, once we get some confirmation. Otherwise,  Delete per nom. -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:50, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I think I'd support deletion of all images by this uploader that don't have some sort of independant confirmation of source or status. There are other problems, some not as obvious. For example I see File:Map Kingston 1897.jpg, a 1897 map originally uploaded as "own work" and "PD-Self". It was later changed to "PD-Old", which sounds more plausible-- except for that authorship was changed to someone who died in 1894-- 3 years before the date clearly visible printed on the map. -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, according Map Kingston 1897 it would be possible this map has been outlined in 1894, but printed three years after. Read the title on this map: Engraved for "Stark's History and Guide yo Jamaica". If you are not sure - don't be suspicious too much. Julo (talk) 19:49, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm generally not too suspicious, but when I see a user upload large quantities of copyright violations &/or very dubious claims, my suspicion can grow regarding their other images, and I may not be inclined to just take their word. If "Stark's History..." can be shown to be PD, great, let's add that info to the image description. -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:13, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I admit some old photographs were from the internet: I will change thier license. The photographs from prisoners in Erica were taken by my grandfather, they are even used on another website (www.oudommen.nl) without permission: that site uses everything unless somebody will claim rights.
The pictures in Italy were taken by myself. To use Italian for pictures in Italy seems convenient to me and to Italian users. Bijltjespad (talk) 09:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Can you clearly indicate which pictures you took from the internet, and where you found them? That a website uses images without specific permission does not mean that you can upload them here under any type of license as you do not know the full story. Even if an image is in the Public Domain, having a website referenced helps those looking for more information.
For the images your grandfather took, you can use the license {{PD-Heirs}}. And only for images he created himself.
The above are just a selection of images you uploaded, can you go through the rest of your uploads and address any issues? Please note that if you choose a license that reads "The copyright holder allows the file to be used..." it assumes you are or know who the copyright holder is, and as such it should be mentioned in the description of the image. Kind regards, -- Deadstar (msg) 11:57, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I just found File:Frankie Trumbauer Orchestra.jpg at the PBS.org website where it is credited Image courtesy of Frank Driggs Collection. There is no evidence this is PD or can be on Commons at all. -- Deadstar (msg) 12:04, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've changed some to {{PD-heirs}}, some are own work. The Trumbauer picture is not from the site you mentioned, but you can find more versions on the internet. So that makes it difficult for me to find the right type of license for this file. With kind regards Bijltjespad (talk) 14:21, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Frank Driggs collection is referenced here, this image appears to be from that collection. In short: The collection consists of more than 78,000 jazz-related images. They are "mostly publicity stills and amateur snapshots by friends and acquaintances. Since 1977, he has made most of his living off reproduction fees from the collection, which was recently appraised at $1.5 million". So that file is not freely available. -- Deadstar (msg) 11:04, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. So it's better to delete File:Frankie Trumbauer Orchestra.jpg. I can't find license information for the files from Belgium: file:Florennes Pavillons.jpg, file:Florennes central.jpg and file:Autorail at station Schleif.jpg - are they to be deleted too? 86.94.225.107 15:04, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you can add a source for the files (where you got it from, or for example somewhere else that it states it was taken in 1910 (for example) and perhaps if the author is known), you can more than likely license it with PD-Old or Anonymous-EU. I hope some other admin can review this request. -- Deadstar (msg) 14:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Huib talk 20:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Karabağ.JPG

[edit]

According to http://www.nkr.am/en/attributes-of-statehood/31/, the flag is wrong. The white triangle has a seration, like teeth. Our SVG image correctly displays the flag. This is also unused. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 03:25, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 01:42, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Astrakhan_Khanate_map.gif

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 04:31, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 21:26, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bolchowitinow_BI-1.jpg

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:28, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 22:29, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lambert-Constant.jpg

[edit]

The source of this image is unclear (the website only say: source all music guide website), the authorship is unclear and the place of first publication. The image shows an british musician, it is an odd assumption, but given that the author is unknown or NO research is done do find out the photographers name or first publication we must assume Commons:Licensing#United Kingdom: 70 years post mortem autoris. The now selected license with 50 years pma is strange and fails in three points: Author unknown, so how can one say the author is dead now for 50 years, it fails the PD in the US requirement and it fails to provide any evidence that the image was first published in a country with such a short copyrigth expiration time (short in comparison with the UK, linked above). Martin H. (talk) 12:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 22:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cobi-mascot.jpg

[edit]

Author could not be verified Jrobertiko (talk) 14:52, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 22:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bonifica_parmigiana_moglia_-_botte_sprospero.jpg

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:30, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Set looks like own work to me. Ever heard of mass DR? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:35, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I heard but they rarely work. MGA has asked this user a few months ago to relicense the images. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:40, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean "rarely work"? A mass DR for this set of four images would have been a bit more work for you, but it would have saved time for everybody else. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
license changed in PD-self. I've made this photos by myself--Pelodia (talk) 13:30, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Justass (talk) 14:39, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bonifica_parmigiana_moglia_-_canale_di_scolo.JPG

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:31, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Set looks like own work to me. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:34, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep me to Gwynhaden (talk) 15:29, 20 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]
license changed in PD-self. I've made this photos by myself--Pelodia (talk) 13:32, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Justass (talk) 14:45, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bonifica_parmigiana_moglia_-_collettori.jpg

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Set looks like own work to me. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:34, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
license changed in PD-self. I've made this photos by myself--Pelodia (talk) 13:31, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Justass (talk) 14:40, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bonifica_parmigiana_moglia_-_mondine.JPG

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Set looks like own work to me. Ever heard of mass DR? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep C'mon Zscout370. Please cease this mass DR of 2005 images that were legally uploaded with the old deprecated PD license tag before October 2008! This feels more and more like a personal mass DR campaign by you. --Leoboudv (talk) 02:07, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
license changed in PD-self. I've made this photos by myself--Pelodia (talk) 13:32, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Justass (talk) 14:42, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Azawakh_map.png

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 04:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, per nominator. Kameraad Pjotr 09:47, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Battrang.jpg

[edit]

While images being sent to ibiblio should be in the public domain or be under a free license, there is no assertion that any of the images truly are. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 04:42, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: a similar DR to this is Commons:Deletion requests/File:Baotang.jpg. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 04:44, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, iBiblio only accepts PD-images. Kameraad Pjotr 10:01, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Benito_juarez.jpg

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:10, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Fix the tag then. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Gwynhaden (talk) 16:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Deleted, no source, no author, no license. Kameraad Pjotr 19:34, 19 March 2010 (UTC) Kameraad Pjotr 19:34, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bermuda-divmap.png

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:13, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep So fix it. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:59, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, assumed PD-self (AGF). Kameraad Pjotr 19:37, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bernadette_soubirous_2_publicdomain.gif

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:15, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Fix the license tag! /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:57, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The image is ~130 years old.

Kept, subject died 1879. Kameraad Pjotr 19:40, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Biometrics_error.jpg

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Fix it! /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, assumed PD-self (AGF). Kameraad Pjotr 19:43, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bismarcks_Wappen_.gif

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Well fix it! /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, assumed PD-old. Kameraad Pjotr 19:54, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blocco_di_Cifrazione.png

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Bollocks. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:44, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, assumed PD-self (AGF). Kameraad Pjotr 20:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blocco_di_Decifrazione.png

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep If this is so terribly important to you, why do not you fix it yourself? What are you trying to accomplish here? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:43, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Why don't you fix the license template yourself? Obsolete license templates can be fixed quickly and is not a good ground for deletion if the image is in scope. --Leoboudv (talk) 03:53, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Gwynhaden (talk) 16:09, 21 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Kept, assumed PD-self (AGF). Kameraad Pjotr 20:01, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bonsoo.jpg

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. No indication of source from Simple EN Wikipedia. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Contact an admin on the source wikipedia. Do some work! /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, assumed PD-self (AGF). Kameraad Pjotr 20:11, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BorAsiaThemes.png

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. There is no indication on who made the graphic. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:38, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Fix it yourself! /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, obvious PD-old. Kameraad Pjotr 20:54, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Borgfors_S.katteberg-20t(†).jpg

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:40, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Try to make an effort to fix a license tag if you think that this is so awfully important. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I added in an Information template, and changed the licence to PD-Old as user says it's from the 1920s (of course that doesn't guarantee anything). There might of course be other reasons now to delete. -- Deadstar (msg) 12:28, 15 December 2009 (UTC) Never mind. -- Deadstar (msg) 12:32, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, 1920 is a bit late to assume PD-old. Kameraad Pjotr 20:55, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brune_m.jpg

[edit]

The image no source for a few years, using obsolete license tag. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Obsolete tag" is not equal to "illegal use". This picture of Guillaume Marie Anne Brune (in use in five Wikipedias) seems to be old enough to be not copyrighted, even if we do not know it's author. Using {{Anonymous}} there, would be justifiable. Julo (talk) 20:08, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete How do you know it is an anonymous work, or old enough? It might as well be a scan from a modern book featuring a recent illustration by a living author. The image has no source specified at all! --Mormegil (talk) 23:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, assumed PD-old (AGF). Kameraad Pjotr 20:56, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Full_steaknumbereight.jpg

[edit]

Source website http://www.insides.be/tjear1958/Nieuwsberichten.htm has no rights to the image. As it looks like a promotional shot for a band, I suspect copyvio from elsewhere. -- Deadstar (msg) 09:44, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, copyright violation. Kameraad Pjotr 21:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Promotie Maastricht.jpg

[edit]

One of the subjects on this picture, who originally gave permission, has asked me, the author, to remove the picture. Sander Spek (talk) 15:24, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Public occasion. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 11:07, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, per Pieter Kuiper & file is in use. Kameraad Pjotr 21:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TMP-Sörnäisten_NMKY.jpg

[edit]

Not photograph, but screenshot of a film. A333 (talk) 15:34, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

do not delete; A screen-shot should be assimilated to a photo. --Trainthh (talk) 08:27, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, not a photograph. Kameraad Pjotr 21:06, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:St._Ignatius_College_Prep.jpg

[edit]

Used as the school logo of St. Ignatius College Preparatory School, it hence seems unlikely that this is the work of the uploader. It may well be in the public domain as an old image, but in that case there is no evidence and the wrong tag is being used. Some information about this log from someone familiar with the school may be helpful, I will leave a note on the school article's talk page on the English Wikipedia. I suspected that the logo may have been taken from the school's website, I have not found it there, and tineye produces no results. Camaron · Christopher · talk 22:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, per nominator. Kameraad Pjotr 21:09, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hector_Guimard_Edicule_porte_Dauphine.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in France. Guimard died in 1942. 193.56.37.1 11:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So, you should delete also all this pictures ? [2] --Yelkrokoyade (talk) 12:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Most of the photographs of his work, being of architecture in France, which is not covered by Freedom of Panorama, should also be deleted. --Simonxag (talk) 12:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. The Evil IP address (talk) 11:17, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Biarua.jpg

[edit]

While images being sent to ibiblio should be in the public domain or be under a free license, there is no assertion that any of the images truly are. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Battrang.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Baotang.jpg for images with the same issue. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: IMHO, by uploading to that web site (ibiblio), the uploaders complied with the site's instructions, "Please note however that according to sunsite.unc.edu rules, all contributions should either belong to the public domain [or equivalent]", and thus effected their release of rights in much the same manner (if, decidedly, more low-tech one - but their site is a lot older than ours) as Wiki Commons users do when selecting a PD-type license during uploading to Wiki Commons. Vmenkov (talk) 02:28, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, but who says these were public domain in the first place? From making some scans from the ibiblio images we have, we had many that were copyvios from painters and from a variety of sources. Frankly, I do not trust this site. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:01, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, images uploaded at ibiblio are in the Public Domain, if they aren't, they're ibiblio's problem. Kameraad Pjotr 18:14, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Villa_uniforme.JPG

[edit]

The author's name is not given, hence {{PD-old}} cannot apply. I guess it could be a Mexican government work, in which case it would be PD (in the public domain before 2003 as a government work published before 1928). But I'm not entirely certain it can be considered a government work. –Tryphon☂ 08:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The name of the picture is Francisco Villa, was taken in 1914, and it´s property of the Centro de Estudios Superiores Universitarios de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (CESU-UNAM) from the Fondo Gildardo Magaña Cerda. If possible, I ask to for the restitution of Archivo:Joaquín Caamaño.JPG that was deleted, the picture information is this... the name is El General Joaquín Caamaño, and was taken from the book Los Compañeros de Zapata of Valentín López González, the author is unknown but its probably from the year 1914, as most of the pictures in the book.

Kept, {{PD-Mexico}}. Kameraad Pjotr 18:17, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, PD-Mexico has a copyright term of 100 years, not 70. Kameraad Pjotr 18:44, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A_Bucuresti_street_scene_-h.jpg

[edit]

There is no COM:FOP in Romania and the building is the predominant object in the image. But what do you think? Leoboudv (talk) 22:57, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Frankly, I wasn't familiar with COM:FOP. I don't really understand it. I find it deeply, deeply counter-intuitive. The night I uploaded this file, I uploaded several dozen other images from Romania, listed here, with my guess as to how they comply with COM:FOP. If this one doesn't comply probably the rest don't either. I'd appreciate some feedback on the other images. Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 04:24, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, no FOP in Romania, banners are the main problem. Kameraad Pjotr 18:22, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A_Bucuresti_street_scene_-d.jpg

[edit]

There is no COM:FOP in Romania and the building is the predominant object in the image. It occupies more than 50% of the picture. But what do you think here? If you think this can be kept as a street scene in Romania, please say so. Leoboudv (talk) 23:06, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A street view with just an ordinary office building. Unsuitable as an architecture photograph. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:58, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Frankly, I wasn't familiar with COM:FOP. I don't really understand it. I find it deeply, deeply counter-intuitive. The night I uploaded this file, I uploaded several dozen other images from Romania, listed here, with my guess as to how they comply with COM:FOP. If this one doesn't comply probably the rest don't either. I'd appreciate some feedback on the other images. Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 04:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep keep the image although I wouldn't suggest putting it into category:architecture

Gwynhaden (talk) 16:00, 21 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Kept, FOP is not an issue here. Kameraad Pjotr 18:24, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images of Lou72JG

[edit]

I believe that User:Lou72JG's images are all copyvios because he has been verified to have uploaded multiple images in violation of copyright on English Wikipedia and has been the subject of a contributor copyright investigation at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Lou72JG. Notably, he has demonstrated complete disregard for copyright laws and policies. In several cases, he restored images deleted after a listing at the Possibly Unfree Files board (such as en:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 May 12#File:1961OFHSEC.jpg. When he reuploaded the image, two days after it was deleted, he did so with the same fraudulent note: "I created this work entirely by myself." His assertion of copyright ownership is meaningless. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:43, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It prouves nothing but I could find no Version of another source per Google. --Mbdortmund (talk) 21:38, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, per nominator, precautionary principle. Kameraad Pjotr 18:19, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2009/12/15&oldid=56233605"