Commons:Deletion requests/2026/04/25
April 25
[edit]This file is a screenshot of a news article published by Sinar Harian, featuring copyrighted content including images of Malaysian political figures such as Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad. It is incorrectly claimed as "own work" and released under CC0, which is invalid. ~2026-25120-29 (talk) 00:52, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
This file appears to be a reproduction of a newspaper page from Sinar Harian dated 7 December 2006. Newspaper content is copyrighted and not in the public domain in Malaysia. Although the uploader claims “own work” and releases it under CC0, this is invalid because they do not own the copyright of the original newspaper layout, text, and images. Simply photographing or scanning a newspaper does not transfer copyright. Malaysia does not have a general rule placing government or published media works into the public domain (unlike some countries such as Indonesia). Therefore, this image remains protected. Additionally, even historically significant periods (e.g., during the era of Mahathir Mohamad) do not affect copyright status—copyright law still applies regardless of political context or age of publication. Conclusion: This file is a clear copyright violation and should be deleted per Commons policy ~2026-25120-29 (talk) 00:57, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
I am the subject of this photo and I request its removal. I do not consent to its use Valkyrielaison (talk) 00:58, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Speedy delete per COM:PERSONAL Evelino Ucelo (talk) 12:02, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment File currently in use; has been on Commons since 2008. Questions: Do we have alternative free licensed photo of this notable person? @Valkyrielaison: can you confirm per COM:VRT that you are the subject of the photo? Would you be willing to arrange to have a photo you like better to be shared under a free license? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:17, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
This file is a reproduction of a newspaper page (likely from Sinar Harian / Harian Metro), which is a copyrighted work. The uploader is unlikely to be the original copyright holder and therefore cannot validly release it under CC0. Malaysian copyright law does not place newspaper content in the public domain. Even if the content involves public figures such as Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, the copyright remains with the publisher. Therefore, the license claim is invalid and the file should be deleted. ~2026-25120-29 (talk) 01:03, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- speedy keep Commons:de minimis. A pinwheel? Seriously? Barely even a central focus of the image. Just crop the sign out if it's really that necessary. Kingofthedead (talk) 08:15, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Keep per COM:De minimis. Nvss132 (talk) 18:13, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- keep Commons:de minimis. The rendering takes up a tiny portion of the image and plays very little role in the overall scene. Kingofthedead (talk) 08:15, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- keep Commons:de minimis, there is barely any original art here. if absolutely necessary, can blur the img. Kingofthedead (talk) 08:14, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- keep Commons:de minimis Kingofthedead (talk) 08:14, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- I disagree. Two billboards are very prominent in the photo, and nothing left after blurring/removing them. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:02, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Weak keep likely De minimis SomeFancyUsername (talk) 08:00, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- keep Commons:de minimis Kingofthedead (talk) 08:14, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Finland A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- It's AI, it cannot be copyrighted. AFeatherlessBipehead (talk) 18:03, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- I was the photographer, and that is also my understanding of AI works. I don't think anything else in the picture is potentially problematic, either. If someone is concerned about other products in the background (which I would argue are de minimis) then the picture could simply be cropped smaller. Moonreach (talk) 20:43, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Delete per COM:DW. This is from a temporary exhibition at outdoor event venue. Mzaki (talk) 05:47, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:DW. This is from a temporary exhibition at outdoor event venue. Mzaki (talk) 05:48, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:DW. This is from a temporary exhibition at outdoor event venue. Mzaki (talk) 05:47, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:DW. This is from a shop interior. Mzaki (talk) 04:33, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Section 62 of the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 is broader than the corresponding provisions in many other countries, and allows photographers to take pictures of
buildings, and
sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship (if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public).
This is a picture of a building with a permanently situated mural in a public place. Not trying to argue, just not sure how this violates the law. — Preceding unsigned comment added by McCIrishman (talk • contribs) 15:11, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Section 62 of the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 is broader than the corresponding provisions in many other countries, and allows photographers to take pictures of buildings, and sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship (if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public).
This is a picture of a building with a permanently situated mural in a public place. Unclear how this violates the law to me but I will delete if that is the case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by McCIrishman (talk • contribs) 18:08, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Section 62 of the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 is broader than the corresponding provisions in many other countries, and allows photographers to take pictures of buildings, and sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship (if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public).
This is a picture of a building with a permanently situated mural in a public place. Unclear how this violates the law to me but I will delete if that is the case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by McCIrishman (talk • contribs) 18:09, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Section 62 of the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 is broader than the corresponding provisions in many other countries, and allows photographers to take pictures of buildings, and sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship (if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public).
This is a picture of a building with a permanently situated mural in a public place. Unclear how this violates the law to me but I will delete if that is the case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by McCIrishman (talk • contribs) 18:08, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Clear copyright violation. The file is a reproduction of a photograph published in Berita Harian (1985). The uploader does not hold the copyright and cannot dedicate it to the public domain (CC0). Malaysian copyright law does not grant public domain status to newspaper works merely due to age; works from the 1980s, including those from the era of Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, remain protected. ~2026-25120-29 (talk) 03:48, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Per COM:SIG UK A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
This file has an unclear copyright status. While it may be in the public domain in Malaysia (published in 1963), there is no evidence of U.S. public domain status. As it originates from a newspaper (Berita Harian), copyright renewal in the United States is possible, meaning it may still be protected. Commons requires free status in both the source country and the United States. ~2026-25120-29 (talk) 04:19, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Why do we have a gallery for a single photo of a not super notable man? PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:42, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Potential Flickrwashing / copyright violation. The file came from https://greekreporter.com/2021/08/15/agia-pelagia-the-vision-leading-to-the-panagia-celebration-on-tinos/, where in turn it is attributed to https://www.flickr.com/people/34823437@N04. The signature in the bottom right (better resolution here, ΕΡΓΟΝ Ι.Μ.ΚΟΙΜ. ΘΕΟΤΟΚΟΥ ΘΡΑΚΟΜΑΚΕΔΟΝωΝ ͵ΑϠϞΗʹ) indicates in Greek numerals that this is a modern 1998 icon from the Kimiseos Theotokou Monastery in Thrakomakedones. If assuming anonymous authorship, this icon will only enter public domain in 2069, unless permission is obtained from the painter. HyperGaruda (talk) 06:08, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
That image of the second death star is property of lucasfilm (see https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/File:DeathStar2.jpg ) Anonymsiy (talk) 06:25, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Speedy delete based on work from Star Wars Evelino Ucelo (talk) 12:27, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 23:59, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Clear COPYVIO PolarManne (talk) 21:00, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope: this image of a person was generated or modified using AI. AI images of identifiable people are generally not permitted on Commons. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph of a notable individual, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 06:55, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope: this image of a person was generated or modified using AI. AI images of identifiable people are generally not permitted on Commons. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph of a notable individual, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 06:58, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused AI-generated Venn diagrams.
Omphalographer (talk) 06:59, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Side note: This illustrates how AI image generation progresses vs. 2025 Claude model generated image, especially in the context of diagrams; Using the same prompt: File:Spacemen-cowboys-venn-alt.svg. Dwxn (talk) 09:54, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
This file is claimed as own work, but appears to be a professional or official portrait. No evidence is provided that the uploader is the photographer or copyright holder. The uploader has a pattern of questionable authorship claims in other uploads. Deletion requested pending proof of permission. ~2026-25120-29 (talk) 07:00, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO France. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 19:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: AI-generated infographic; the images in this collage are all fictitious, including ones which are implied to represent real people or events. Omphalographer (talk) 07:02, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Weak keep I think that this infographic is about concepts rather than real people, but I am not sure about usefulness of generated infographics. Evelino Ucelo (talk) 10:44, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Delete Fails COM:AIIP because of the inclusion of real people. Also, why can't the uploader make a collage out of the many real, relevant actual photos already on Commons? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:24, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope: this image of a person was generated or modified using AI. AI images of identifiable people are generally not permitted on Commons. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph of a notable individual, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 07:05, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Delete as copyvio. See [1]. I think someone just downloaded that, used Apple Cleanup to clean it up, and uploaded it as own work. — Rhododendrites talk | 17:07, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope: this image of a person was generated or modified using AI. AI images of identifiable people are generally not permitted on Commons. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph of a notable individual, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 07:07, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
license laundering
- File:Handling heatwaves with Vernon and Petunia -HarryPotter.webm
- File:Petunia Dursley in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.jpg
- File:Vernon Dursley in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (cropped).jpg
- File:Vernon Dursley in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.jpg
JaydenChao (talk) 07:15, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Strong keep – Files are sourced from an official franchise account upload and are thus covered by COM:FREEDEPICTION. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 05:27, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
- This is like the Vogue Taiwan situation all over again, Delete as incompatible with commons licensing. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 01:08, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- Keep The uploader is an official Harry Potter channel, which makes the license valid per COM:FREEDEPICTION. @Alachuckthebuck, read that guideline first before arguing about Commons compatibility. Dabmasterars [EN/RU] (talk/uploads) 22:48, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Dabmasterars that same guideline explicitly states that the only reason the star wars video is ok is because it doesn't contain copyrighted characters. JK Rowling still holds copyright on the Harry Potter books and Characters, and I can almost guarantee the licensing agreement between her and Warner Bros. didn't allow them to release media from the movie under a creative commons license as it's a derivative work of a (very much still copyrighted) book. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 01:34, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
- That one is an AI generated video, which are usually public domain with specific exception, such as that of copyrighted characters. This is a different case; while Rowling does indeed own the characters, the publisher has the right to control the depictions of characters, release and license them accordingly (including under Creative Commons). I'm not pulling this information out of my ass either, there have been multiple discussions regarding official YouTube channel uploading under CC BY, with most of these files being kept due to publishers inherently having the right to distribute and license content. Dabmasterars [EN/RU] (talk/uploads) 07:34, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Dabmasterars that same guideline explicitly states that the only reason the star wars video is ok is because it doesn't contain copyrighted characters. JK Rowling still holds copyright on the Harry Potter books and Characters, and I can almost guarantee the licensing agreement between her and Warner Bros. didn't allow them to release media from the movie under a creative commons license as it's a derivative work of a (very much still copyrighted) book. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 01:34, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
- This is like the Vogue Taiwan situation all over again,
https://www.kyodonews.jp/copyright.html 0713jp (talk) 07:38, 25 April 2026 (UTC) https://www.kyodonews.jp/english/copyright.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 0713jp (talk • contribs) 07:43, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Delete The source given is Google, unless we can find a suitable source this has to go.
COM:PERSONAL. A photograph of an insignificant person. Not hosting GAndy (talk) 07:38, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ~2026-25120-29 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation. Photograph of a copyrighted book cover; uploader is not the copyright holder of the cover design.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. IMO, the cover design is too simple and below COM:TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Keep definitely below ToO Evelino Ucelo (talk) 10:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
did not source this file correctly PrimGames (talk) 08:47, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- What do you mean? Is there something that can't be fixed by editing the page? Alenoach (talk) 13:56, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Useless photo, it's not used Alexysun (talk) 09:12, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. Herbert Ortner (talk) 17:00, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
No use in this photo. Alexysun (talk) 09:18, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. Herbert Ortner (talk) 17:01, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Unexplained - has no educational value. Rathfelder (talk) 09:22, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:23, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:23, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Unsure about out-of-scope, but this appears to be a derivative work of a TV show, which may violate COM:TOO. TranqyPoo (talk) 15:26, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:23, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:24, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:25, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:25, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:26, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:26, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Unexplained - has no educational value. Rathfelder (talk) 09:26, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:26, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:26, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:29, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:31, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:34, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:36, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:36, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:41, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:41, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:41, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:42, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Unusable file, per transparent background, as well as an erroneous CoA, due to ermine spots being in front of the bend, which the user corrected (or not), by uploading different versions (COA fr IBR2.svg, COA fr Bréhat.svg, COA fr IBR.svg), instead of overwiting the existing one, which makes currently 5 files for the purpose, so it's definitely not worth correcting this one aka “the unusable”.
Kontributor 2K (talk) 09:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:47, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:47, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:48, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:48, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
The license applies to the video page, not the user's avatar. Thyj (talk) 10:21, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
This file was uploaded by myself with the wrong CC label and is not on the public domain anymore. It should be deleted as soon as possible. Vigoga 97 (talk) 10:39, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- The photographer ca:Josep Maria Sagarra i Plana died in 1959, so it wouldn't yet be in the public domain in Spain as a work of art. However, as a simple photograph it has been in the public domain since 1955 or earlier. Therefore, Keep and tag it with {{PD-Spain-photo}}. Pere prlpz (talk) 12:31, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you @Pere prlpz! Vigoga 97 (talk) 11:55, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Source website indicates the images are licensed under CC-BY-NC (non-commercial), not released to PD as uploader claimed.
- File:知名影星王引抵臺.jpg
- File:港九地區電影界代表團回國參加金馬獎 (1981年) 01.jpg
- File:港九地區電影界代表團回國參加金馬獎 (1981年).jpg
- File:尤敏抵臺參加第18屆金馬獎.jpg
- File:王引與尤敏返國參加第18屆金馬獎 (1981年).jpg
- File:王引與尤敏返國參加第18屆金馬獎.jpg
- File:港九地區電影界代表團回國參加金馬獎 02.jpg
- File:港九地區電影界代表團回國參加金馬獎 01.jpg
- File:港九地區電影界代表團回國參加金馬獎.jpg
- File:王引獲頒第18屆金馬獎「特別獎」 02.jpg
- File:王引獲頒第18屆金馬獎「特別獎」 01.jpg
- File:王引獲頒第18屆金馬獎「特別獎」 (1981年).jpg
- File:王引獲頒第18屆金馬獎「特別獎」.jpg
- File:第1屆金馬獎最佳童星獎得主費立.jpg
- File:第2屆金馬獎最佳童星獎得主羅宛琳 (1963年).jpg
- File:第2屆金馬獎最佳童星獎得主羅宛琳.jpg
- File:第3屆金馬獎最佳童星獎得主小龍.jpg
- File:第4屆金馬獎最佳童星獎得主謝玲玲.jpg
- File:第5屆金馬獎最佳童星獎得主謝玲玲.jpg
- File:第5屆金馬獎最佳童星獎得主謝玲玲與頒獎人及其他得獎人合影.jpg
- File:第7屆金馬獎最佳童星獎得主吳鳳凰與頒獎者及其他得獎人合影.jpg
- File:第9屆金馬獎最佳童星獎得主游龍.jpg
- File:金馬獎最佳童星獎得主游龍與陳莎莉合影.jpg
- File:第11屆金馬獎最佳童星獎得主湯志偉.jpg
- File:行政院長蔣經國與第11屆金馬獎得主合影 (1973年).jpg
- File:第14屆金馬獎最佳童星獎得主鄔裕康.jpg
- File:第15屆金馬獎最佳童星獎得主黃一龍.jpg
- File:第15屆金馬獎最佳童星獎得主黃一龍與其他得獎人合影.jpg
- File:第16屆金馬獎最佳童星獎得主歐弟.jpg
- File:第17屆金馬獎最佳童星獎得主林小樓.jpg
- File:第19屆金馬獎最佳童星獎得主周品君.jpg
- File:第20屆金馬獎最佳童星獎得主石安妮.jpg
- File:第21屆金馬獎最佳童星獎得主林鼎峰.jpg
Tvpuppy (talk) 18:11, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Info, uploader claimed the author, Central News Agency (CNA), release the images into PD. According to the discussion in the previous DR, the images were initially tagged with PDM but it was changed afterwards. However, CNA is not the author, they only uploaded the images to the source website. The source page has indicated the actual author/photographer’s name in the image description for each image (also seen in the image description in Commons). This means the initial PDM tags were invalid. Tvpuppy (talk) 18:26, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- 如同您所述，原本這批照片都是由持有照片的中央通訊社標記是屬於PDM狀態，但在我上傳到維基共享資源後，中央通訊社才改成CC-BY-NC。如果因為這點而要刪除照片，這部分我沒有異議。 KOKUYO (talk) 05:49, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 10:10, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
https://tcmb.culture.tw/zh-tw/detail?indexCode=Culture_Object&id=622190 -> https://cmsdb.culture.tw/object/DCBB034E-F2F0-4FF7-87AD-659FCEC120B9 -> https://web.archive.org/web/20231124031923/https://cmsdb.culture.tw/object/DCBB034E-F2F0-4FF7-87AD-659FCEC120B9 which shows that as of 20231124031923 this file was provided by 中央通訊社 to 國家文化記憶庫 under cc by nd.
RoyZuo (talk) 11:03, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- 如同前面所述，原本上傳時是標記PMD，但上傳之後被改為CC-BY-NC。--KOKUYO (talk) 11:21, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Lack of proper permission through OTRS. Таёжный лес (talk) 11:30, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
I love this book, but unfortunately, the image's source and license are obviously invalid. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 11:56, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
صورة لها حقوق يمكن رفعها ضمن الاستعمال العادل Mohammed Qays 🗣 12:09, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 12:28, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by PinkDash as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10. Advertizing is not obvious, file is used in Wikidata. I allow regular deletion discussion. Taivo (talk) 12:44, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:INUSE Evelino Ucelo (talk) 13:25, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Omphalographer as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10. Wikidata has item Q139551833 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q139551833). I create a regular deletion discussion about educational value. Taivo (talk) 12:55, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
I uploaded a new version of this file in a new format (Organigrama Ministerio Transformación Digital (Febrero 2024).pdf). It has better quality. As the original author, I request and recommend its deletion. TheRichic (talk) 13:10, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
This cropped file is no longer needed. The original uncropped image already exists and should be used instead: File:Kawa Abban meeting with Fazil Mirani In Kurdistan Democratic Party 2026.jpg. Please delete this cropped version to avoid duplicate/incorrect use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alan Imar (talk • contribs) 12:32, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Keep, INUSE at en:Deputy Prime Minister of the Kurdistan Region. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:26, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- I request the deletion of this file because I am the person shown in the image and I am the rights holder of the original photo. This file is a cropped/modified version of the original image that was published by me on my own page. I do not consent to the publication, cropping, modification, or reuse of my original photos in this way.
- Please delete this file, as well as any cropped, edited, extracted, or derivative versions based on the original image. Alan Imar (talk) 11:06, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- I request the deletion of this file because I am the person shown in the image and I am the rights holder of the original photo. This file is a cropped/modified version of the original image that was published by me on my own page. I do not consent to the publication, cropping, modification, or reuse of my original photos in this way.
- Please delete this file, as well as any cropped, edited, extracted, or derivative versions based on the original image. Alan Imar (talk) 11:06, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Alan Imar: When you uploaded File:Kawa Abban meeting with Fazil Mirani In Kurdistan Democratic Party 2026.jpg in Special:Permalink/1178111552, you agreed to {{self|cc-zero}}. With the {{Cc-zero}} license that is included, you consented to allow others to "copy, modify, distribute", etc. Modification includes cropping. Mohammed Alan copied the image, modified it by cropping it, and distributed it here according to your consent. Are you withdrawing that consent now? If so, which part or parts? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:35, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- He cropped the photo in half and permanently removed Ambassador Kawa Abban from it, even though the photo was published and announced under his name. He also reposted the cropped photo twice in order to hide the original image and make the edited version appear instead. This appears to be a deliberate act intended to cause offense. I contacted him, but he does not respond, as if the account were fake. Alan Imar (talk) 00:26, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Alan Imar: You may use the full photo on en:Deputy Prime Minister of the Kurdistan Region if you want. Do you know how to do that? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 05:15, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
- He cropped the photo in half and permanently removed Ambassador Kawa Abban from it, even though the photo was published and announced under his name. He also reposted the cropped photo twice in order to hide the original image and make the edited version appear instead. This appears to be a deliberate act intended to cause offense. I contacted him, but he does not respond, as if the account were fake. Alan Imar (talk) 00:26, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Alan Imar: When you uploaded File:Kawa Abban meeting with Fazil Mirani In Kurdistan Democratic Party 2026.jpg in Special:Permalink/1178111552, you agreed to {{self|cc-zero}}. With the {{Cc-zero}} license that is included, you consented to allow others to "copy, modify, distribute", etc. Modification includes cropping. Mohammed Alan copied the image, modified it by cropping it, and distributed it here according to your consent. Are you withdrawing that consent now? If so, which part or parts? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:35, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Above TOO. Fair use. ~2026-21135-27 (talk) 13:41, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see this logo is above the TOO, which is in fact pretty high in the US. Fma12 (talk) 18:57, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
The footer of the website states that all content from it is copyrighted, so isn't a free image BrunoGuedes1 (talk) 13:50, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Very likely NETCOPYVIO, as an example see publication six years before https://botana.biz/prepod/dop_obrazovanie/o4i1pxgm.html. Lack of metadata. Таёжный лес (talk) 14:14, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Cropped pixelized photo without metadata, very likely NETCOPYVIO. Таёжный лес (talk) 14:20, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Because another file like this already exists. Daniil Plotnikov 1 (talk) 14:26, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- no valid rationale Adtonko (talk) 19:32, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Very likely NETCOPYVIO, as in three other user's uploads; obviously incorrect date of creation. Таёжный лес (talk) 14:26, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
redrawn picture (https://avatars.mds.yandex.net/i?id=8ce5a9c19e1eb31972b904ee815346ee2b399762-12422010-images-thumbs&n=13, https://img1.liveinternet.ru/images/attach/c/4/79/936/79936887_4684700_y_bd762f52.jpg) Таёжный лес (talk) 14:34, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Autoría falsa. Foto de sus redes. Como indica el nombre, mera captura de pantalla de la misma Lost in subtitles (talk) 14:36, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
AI-created video, possibly with an unfree base. Таёжный лес (talk) 14:37, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
No source could be found in general reference books for these three CoAs, so, unless references are provided, the files are out of scope.
Kontributor 2K (talk) 14:48, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
I uploaded a new version of this file in a new format (Organigrama Ministerio Vivienda (Febrero 2024).pdf). It has better quality. As the original author, I request and recommend its deletion. TheRichic (talk) 15:22, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Not properly licensed (see: https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/pat-mcnally-with-pedro-rodriguez-during-the-monaco-gp-at-news-photo/2160139620) Formula2racer (talk) 15:33, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Withdraw [Keep; upon further examination photograph does appear properly licensed; srv]. Formula2racer (talk) 12:43, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
book not created by uploader TTSolitaire (talk) 15:50, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Not own work. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:05, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- if this was indeed 1910, then it is {{PD-old-auto-expired}} Adtonko (talk) 19:31, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Adtonko: but still not own work — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 19:38, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, that wasn't my point :-) Adtonko (talk) 21:11, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- my mistake, delete it Ruekoltrane (talk) 22:48, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, that wasn't my point :-) Adtonko (talk) 21:11, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Adtonko: but still not own work — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 19:38, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
No evidence for a free license for the photo. The source licenses it under CC BY-NC-SA. Janhrach (talk) 16:10, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- The image is released by British Museum with CC BY-NC-SA.
- However, the depicted object (the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylonian_Map_of_the_World) is dated " after 9th century BC".
- It seems to me that this is a case of "faithful reproductions" of an artistic piece (Commons:Reuse of PD-Art photographs).
- In the meanwhile, i propose to clarify this in the license and then see how the process will end. Sette-quattro (talk) 16:21, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Probably not own work — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:11, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
National Cancer Institute would not have owned the copyright to the label, which is beyond the de minimis standard. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:24, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
According to the image's metadata, its a screenshot. That's the original source: Jade's Instagram profile. It's not a free image. BrunoGuedes1 (talk) 16:25, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. If you are trying to create a Wikipedia article, please see it:Aiuto:Aiuto. Omphalographer (talk) 16:44, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- As well as File:Dadagabem Scultrice e la sua Arte.pdf, which appears to be a slightly extended version of the same document. Omphalographer (talk) 22:29, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Neural slop without any educational value. Таёжный лес (talk) 17:04, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Se reemplazó por otra imagen cortada Señore puquina (talk) 17:14, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
redrawn picture (https://avatars.mds.yandex.net/i?id=612f1c7ed4ea6a2d6896195792620fdf_l-9269009-images-thumbs&n=13) Таёжный лес (talk) 17:20, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
File:Young Stan Lee Praga in Moscow vizit pl stlimys Стэн Ли psikh sova crazy owl sport sport.jpg
[edit]Doodle with low value. Partially redrawn (see https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d5/fd/c0/d5fdc096e83583dacafcb4fc4bfde8a6.jpg) Таёжный лес (talk) 17:32, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
I am the original uploader. The subject of the photo and I agree that this specific image is unsuitable and unrepresentative. I have already uploaded a much better, higher-quality, and officially preferred portrait to be used in the article instead. Therefore, this current image is now entirely redundant, and I kindly request its deletion as a courtesy to the subject since a superior alternative is already available. The better version is: File:د. مشعان العتيبي.jpg Elec-kw (talk) 17:37, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
I am the original uploader. The subject of the photo and I agree that this specific image is unsuitable and unrepresentative. I have already uploaded a much better, higher-quality, and officially preferred portrait to be used in the article instead. Therefore, this current image is now entirely redundant, and I kindly request its deletion as a courtesy to the subject since a superior alternative is already available. The better version is: File:د. مشعان العتيبي.jpg Elec-kw (talk) 17:39, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
 | I am looking for help! Ask your question below. You can also look at the Contents, ask at the Help desk, or ask users on the #wikimedia-commons webchat IRC channel. Note to helpers: Once you have offered help, please replace this template with {{Helped}} |
It has been 21 days since I nominated this file for deletion. As the original uploader, I repeat my request: the subject of the photo (my father) found this image unsuitable and has provided a superior professional replacement which is already uploaded and used in the article. There have been no objections in 3 weeks. Please close this request and delete the file. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bo-rakan-kw (talk • contribs) 14:51, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
I am the original uploader. The subject of the photo and I agree that this specific image is unsuitable and unrepresentative. I have already uploaded a much better, higher-quality, and officially preferred portrait to be used in the article instead. Therefore, this current image is now entirely redundant, and I kindly request its deletion as a courtesy to the subject since a superior alternative is already available. The better version is: File:د. مشعان العتيبي.jpg Bo-rakan-kw (talk) 17:41, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Website doesn't publish its images freely Nurken (talk) 17:44, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Electronic-Arts-Logo.svg. PhotographyEdits (talk) 17:56, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- .svg was made from this file. Adtonko (talk) 19:28, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
There already are superior SVG versions available: File:ADR 9A.svg or File:Dangclass9A.svg. This JPG-version is not in use anywhere, so can be deleted. Btrs (talk) 18:09, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
The page seeams like it was done using AI ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ 18:17, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
This is a fictitious flag, designed by the uploader, which the original author has deprecated due to its use of the hammer and sickle. As this flag could potentially mislead readers into believing the hammer and sickle was associated with anarchism, or that it has historically been combined with the circle-A and/or emblazoned on the anarchist flag, I don't think this realistically serves an educational purpose. Due to these reasons, and because it is not in use on any other Wikimedia project, I believe this falls outside of the project scope and am nominating it for deletion. Grnrchst (talk) 18:50, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Keep The image is used on the user's page. The hammer and sickle has also been used by some anarchist movements (see, for example, File:Anarchist-Communist Symbol.jpg or File:Zapatismo Picture Marcos.jpg). Поль Крол Злой Диктатор (talk) 02:45, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- Both of these images are user created, with no evidence of real-world usage. --Grnrchst (talk) 08:18, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- Quote from the description of the first: "It has since been used by a few activist groups, most noteably the Red & Anarchist Action Network". Поль Крол Злой Диктатор (talk) 13:34, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- And provides no evidence of that. --Grnrchst (talk) 14:23, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- Quote from the description of the first: "It has since been used by a few activist groups, most noteably the Red & Anarchist Action Network". Поль Крол Злой Диктатор (talk) 13:34, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- Also worth pointing out that COM:INUSE explicitly excludes cases where an image is in use only on user pages, which is the case here. It being used on a single user page isn't justification for keeping the image. --Grnrchst (talk) 17:55, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- Both of these images are user created, with no evidence of real-world usage. --Grnrchst (talk) 08:18, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Source does not indicate the date of the photo. By my URAA math, if the photo was published after 1945 1937 with wartime extension it was subject to US copyright restoration. This seems very probable judging by the apparent age of the subject. Phillipedison1891 (talk) 18:51, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Per COM:HOST. This drawing doesn't seem to have a potential educational use. Issac I Navarro (talk) 18:54, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Keep useful for illustrating fan ponies Dronebogus (talk) 00:40, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BuickCentury04 as Fair use (logo fur) and the most recent rationale was: Description = Logo for the American rock band Lit|Source = Lit Official Site|Article = Lit (band)|Use = Infobox JaydenChao (talk) 18:57, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- It lacked any originality. It just a simple design. Lit and a star. TheGrimeSoul (talk) 19:41, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
The picture in the background is not the own work of the artist, no indication for public domain, see ticket:2026032010006312 Ameisenigel (talk) 19:04, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Not PD until at least 2030 Adtonko (talk) 19:04, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS Issac I Navarro (talk) 19:11, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS Issac I Navarro (talk) 19:14, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Keep pony doll is clearly de min to the drone, which is utilitarian Dronebogus (talk) 10:08, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Text, own upload Issac I Navarro (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Text, own upload Issac I Navarro (talk) 19:24, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Planet image is copyrighted image of mustafar which is property of lucasfilm (see https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/File:Jestefad.png ) Anonymsiy (talk) 19:43, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
There is no information about the photo's publication, and the description states that the author is unknown. If the photo has not been published, it is not available under the PD-Russia license GAndy (talk) 19:45, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
The source is a 2010 book, and the author of the photo is not specified. If there is no information that the photo has not been published before, it is not available under the PD-Russia license GAndy (talk) 19:47, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
The source is a personal archive. If the photo has not been legally published before, it is not available under the PD-Russia license. The copyright term begins to count from the moment of publication GAndy (talk) 19:52, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Simple text table, not in use, out-of-scope Btrs (talk) 20:07, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS Issac I Navarro (talk) 20:28, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Keep de minimis, mostly focused on the speaker Dronebogus (talk) 10:02, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS Issac I Navarro (talk) 20:30, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Polish/Prussian author died in 1956, so undelete at the beginning of next year. Phillipedison1891 (talk) 20:35, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Keep Below COM:TOO Germany. --Rosenzweig τ 08:55, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
- He died on February 14, 1956 - so over 70 years ago Aleksander Durkiewicz (talk) 18:49, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
- In most cases, copyright terms run to the end of the calendar year, so a work doesn't enter the public domain until the next January 1st after it would otherwise be eligible. Phillipedison1891 (talk) 21:29, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Image doesn't fall under any of the PD-Russia paragraphs (author died in 1989) Таёжный лес (talk) 20:37, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS Issac I Navarro (talk) 20:44, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Isn't it a type of pic in pic? Satirdan kahraman (talk) 20:47, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Com:HOST doesn't seem educationally useful Issac I Navarro (talk) 20:54, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
This photo was taken between 1948 and 1964, when the subject occupied the position of "Landrat" in Grafenau. URAA math says the copyright was restored in the US. Phillipedison1891 (talk) 20:58, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Subject died in 1954. Public domain status, especially in the US, entirely depends on the publication date, for which we have no information. Phillipedison1891 (talk) 21:07, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS Issac I Navarro (talk) 22:34, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Keep I think the design is generic and/or utilitarian. Dronebogus (talk) 06:49, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- Keep Largely utilitarian, I don't think two rows of shiny stones are copyrightable. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:47, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
COM:HOST. Not of educational value as far as I can see. Coolgurl5555 (talk) 22:38, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS Issac I Navarro (talk) 22:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- in a previous discussion it was decided to keep the file because is below WP:TOO. --valepert (talk) 11:03, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- Keep Below COM:TOO. (Oinkers42) (talk) 01:13, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
French anonymous photograph, first known publication is in a 1937 newspaper. With Second World War copyright extensions, copyright was barely restored in the US by URAA. Missed it by thaaaat much. Phillipedison1891 (talk) 22:50, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS Issac I Navarro (talk) 22:53, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Comment is a plush smiley above Portugal’s TOO? Because it isn’t above the US’s Dronebogus (talk) 09:53, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS Issac I Navarro (talk) 23:01, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS Issac I Navarro (talk) 23:03, 25 April 2026 (UTC)