Surgical procedure | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
Osteoarthritis care | Â | Â |
Low morbidity, low complication rate | Less predictable outcome | |
| Â | Joint preserving | Â |
| Â | Simple rehabilitation | Â |
Humeral head resurfacing with biologic interposition [21–23] | Avoids glenoid prosthesis | Mixed results |
| Â | Obviates concerns over glenoid loosening over time | Less predictable pain relief |
| Â | Theoretically, preserves bone stock for future reconstructive options | Revision surgery in event of failure |
Avoids glenoid prosthesis | Less predictable pain relief | |
| Â | Obviates concerns over glenoid loosening over time | Increased time to maximal improvement |
| Â | Shorter operation room time | Lower survival rate |
| Â | Â | Risk of glenoid bone loss over time |
| Â | Â | Revision surgery in event of failure |
Predictable pain relief | Risk of glenoid loosening | |
| Â | Predictable functional improvement | Â |
| Â | Proven longevity | Â |
Joint preserving | No long-term outcome result | |
| Â | Avoids or postpones arthroplasty procedure | Indicated in limited population, that is, young individuals with isolated defects |
Rotator cuff disease care | Â | Â |
Favorable long-term outcome | Long recovery | |
| Â | Restores normal anatomy | Tendon healing unpredictable |
| Â | Pain relief | Â |
| Â | Theoretically, protective against further degenerative changes in muscle and tendon | Â |
Indicated primarily for irreparable tear | Less predictable results | |
| Â | Pain relief | Further degenerative changes to bone and soft tissue structures possible |
| Â | Lower morbidity than muscle transfer or arthroplasty | Â |
Muscle transfer [97] | Salvage procedure for irreparable cuff | Limited indications |
| Â | Potentially restores strength | Mixed results |
| Â | Pain relief | Long recovery period |
Salvage procedure for irreparable tear | Higher morbidity and complication rate | |
| Â | Pain relief | Limited indications, that is, older patients |
| Â | Restores function | Â |