tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4110180.post7126768729253781378..comments2025-07-21T06:33:41.604-07:00Comments on Tapestry Central: Upcoming Clojure TalksHoward Lewis Shiphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04486596490758986709noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4110180.post-8165364799028583622009-06-10T21:21:18.145-07:002009-06-10T21:21:18.145-07:00nooo please not yet another web framework to consi...nooo please not yet another web framework to consider ;)Chrigelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05227615949751525227noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4110180.post-70528809719751665332009-06-08T05:31:18.959-07:002009-06-08T05:31:18.959-07:00Nope, Tapestry is very stateFUL, Clojure is stateL...Nope, Tapestry is very stateFUL, Clojure is stateLESS. I don't see how you would use them together, except perhaps to dress up Clojure functions as Tapestry IoC services. I have some ideas about a Clojure based web framework, but it's not Tapestry at all ... its a more traditional action/view (not component) framework.Howard Lewis Shiphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04486596490758986709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4110180.post-27776278562602974812009-06-07T23:58:52.281-07:002009-06-07T23:58:52.281-07:00Lot of Clojure theses previous months... Do we hav...Lot of Clojure theses previous months... Do we have to expect a Tapestry4Clojure? :)Robin K.https://www.blogger.com/profile/02953518033709209636noreply@blogger.com